Language selection

Search

Patent 2315618 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2315618
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE PRODUCTION DE PEROXYDE D'HYDROGENE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C01B 15/029 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • NYSTROM, MATS (Sweden)
  • WANNGARD, JOHAN (Sweden)
  • HERRMANN, WOLFGANG (Sweden)
(73) Owners :
  • AKZO NOBEL N.V. (Netherlands (Kingdom of the))
(71) Applicants :
  • AKZO NOBEL N.V. (Netherlands (Kingdom of the))
(74) Agent: NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L., S.R.L.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2004-02-24
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1998-12-22
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-07-01
Examination requested: 2000-06-20
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/SE1998/002442
(87) International Publication Number: WO1999/032398
(85) National Entry: 2000-06-20

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
97850180.7 European Patent Office (EPO) 1997-12-22

Abstracts

English Abstract




The invention concurs a process of
continuously producing hydrogen perox-
ide by direct reaction between hydrogen
and oxygen in a gaseous reaction mixture
in contact with a catalyst maintained in
a reactor (1), wherein a gaseous reaction
mixture containing hydrogen and oxygen
is supplied to the reactor through an in-
let and hydrogen peroxide enriched gas (3)
is withdrawn from the reactor through an
outlet. According to the invention the tem-
perature difference in the gaseous inaction
mixture in contact with the catalyst be-
tween a position just after the inlet to the
reactor and a position at the outlet of the
reactor is maintained below about 40°C.


French Abstract

L'invention porte sur un procédé de production continu de peroxyde d'hydrogène par réaction directe entre l'hydrogène et l'oxygène dans un mélange réactionnel gazeux en contact avec un catalyseur maintenu dans un réacteur (1). Le mélange réactionnel gazeux contenant l'hydrogène et l'oxygène est amené dans le réacteur par un orifice d'admission, et le gaz (3) enrichi en peroxyde d'hydrogène est retiré du réacteur par un orifice d'évacuation. Selon cette invention, la différence de température du mélange réactionnel gazeux en contact avec le catalyseur entre le moment où ce mélange se trouve juste après l'orifice d'admission au réacteur et le moment où il se trouve au niveau de l'orifice d'évacuation du réacteur est maintenue au-dessous d'environ 40 DEG C.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



9

CLAIMS:

1. A process of continuously producing hydrogen peroxide by direct reaction
between hydrogen and oxygen in a gaseous reaction mixture in contact with a
catalyst
maintained in a reactor, wherein a gaseous reaction mixture containing
hydrogen and
oxygen is supplied to the reactor through an inlet and hydrogen peroxide
enriched gas
is withdrawn from the reactor through an outlet, and comprising a step of
leading
thermal energy produced during the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen from
the
hydrogen peroxide enriched gas at the outlet of the reactor to the reaction
mixture
before it enters or when it just has entered the reactor, and wherein the
temperature
difference in the gaseous reaction mixture in contact with the catalyst
between a
position just after the inlet to the reactor and a position at the outlet of
the reactor is
maintained below about 40°C.

2. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the temperature difference in the
gaseous reaction mixture in contact with the catalyst between a position just
after the
inlet to the reactor and a position at the outlet of the reactor is maintained
below 25°C.

3. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein the temperature difference in the
gaseous reaction mixture in contact with the catalyst between a position just
after the
inlet to the reactor and a position at the outlet of the reactor is maintained
below 15°C.

4. A process as claimed in claim 1, 2 or 3 further comprising the steps of
treating at
least a portion of the hydrogen peroxide enriched gas from the outlet of the
reactor for
recovering hydrogen peroxide, cooling the gas and then recirculating it back
to the
reactor.

5. A process as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3 or 4, wherein in a treatment for
recovering
hydrogen peroxide the total pressure of the gas deviates with less than about
25% from
total pressure of the gas in the reactor.




10

6. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-5, comprising a step of
recirculating
a portion of the hydrogen peroxide enriched gas from the outlet of the reactor
back to
the reactor without recovering hydrogen peroxide therefrom, and thereby
leading
thermal energy back for heating the reaction mixture entering the reactor.

7. A process as claimed in claim 6, comprising a step of mixing hydrogen
peroxide
enriched gas recirculated without recovering hydrogen peroxide therefrom with
cooled
gas from a hydrogen peroxide recovery step to form a reaction mixture and
supplying
that mixture to the reactor.

8. A process as claimed in claim 6 or 7, comprising a step of adding cooled
gas
from a hydrogen peroxide recovery step to the reaction mixture by introducing
it
directly into the reactor at at least one of:
i) one or several feed points along the reactor and
ii) between separate sections of the reactor.

9. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-8, wherein the gaseous reaction
mixture is in contact with a catalyst in the form of a fluidized bed in the
reactor.

10. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-9, wherein the process is
operated
to obtain a hydrogen peroxide enriched gas containing more than 0.2 mol% of
hydrogen peroxide.

11. A process as claimed in any one of the claim 1-11, characterized in that
the
temperature of the reaction mixture in contact with the catalyst is maintained
above
105°C.

12. A process as claimed in claim 11, wherein the temperature of the reaction
mixture is maintained above about 110°C.




11

13. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-12, wherein the temperature of
the
reaction mixture in contact with the catalyst is maintained below about
160°C.

14. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-13, wherein the oxygen
concentration in the reaction mixture is maintained below about 5 mol %.

15. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-14, wherein the hydrogen
concentration in the reaction mixture is maintained below about 5 mol %.

16. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-15, wherein the gaseous
reaction
mixture is in contact with a solid catalyst comprising a catalytically active
material
deposited on a support, wherein the BET area of said support is below about 80
m2 per
ml reactor volume.

17. A process as claimed in claim 16, wherein the BET area of said support is
below
about 20 m2 per ml reactor volume.

18. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-17, wherein the gaseous
reaction
mixture is in contact with a solid catalyst comprising a catalytically active
material
deposited on a support selected from glass, pure silica or pure aluminium
oxide.

19. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-18, wherein the step of
leading
thermal energy produced during the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen from
the
hydrogen peroxide enriched gas at the outlet of the reactor to the reaction
mixture is
before it enters the reactor.

20. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1-18, wherein the step of
leading
thermal energy produced during the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen from
the



12

hydrogen peroxide enriched gas at the outlet of the reactor to the reaction
mixture is
when it just has entered the reactor.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02315618 2000-06-20
WO 99/32398 PCT/SE98/OZ442
1
PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF HYDROOBN PFROXIDE -
The present invention relates to a process of producing hydrogen peroxide by
direct reaction between hydrogen and oxygen in the presence of a catalyst, to
form hy-
drogen peroxide gas, a new catalyst suitable for the process and preparation
thereof.
Production of hydrogen peroxide by direct reaction between hydrogen and oxygen
can be performed by contacting hydrogen and oxygen with a catalyst in an
aqueous reac-
tion medium as described in, for example, the US patents 4881751, 4772458,
5180573,
5128114 and 5338531, as well as J. R. Kosak (DuPont), "A Novel Fxed Bed
Catalyst for
the Direct Combination of HZ and 02 to HsOz", Chem. Ind. (Dekker), 1995, Vol.
82, Ca
talysis of Organic Reactions.
However, the formation of hydrogen peroxide is rather slow and k is hard to
obtain
high concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. These problems aro assumed to be due
to the
fads that only low amounts of the reactants can be dissolved in the reaction
medium and
that the same catalyst that promotes formation of hydrogen peroxide also
catalyses its de-
composition into water and oxygen.
US patent 5500202 discloses production of hydrogen peroxide in a reactor,
wherein hydrogen and oxygen are reacted in a gaseous state at the surface of a
solid
catalyst and the hydrogen peroxide formed is dissolved in a liquid trickling
through the re
actor. However, also in this process only hydrogen peroxide solutions of low
concentration
and low purity can be obtained:
DE patent 558431 discloses produk~ion of hydrogen peroxide from oxygen and
hydrogen in gas phase at a temperature below the freezing point and a pressure
of at least
100 atm. These extreme conditions render the process very expensive
commercially un-
attractive.
CH patent 140403 discloses a similar method but fails to suggest any suitable
temperature, while US 2368640 recommends operation at a temperature between
400 and
650°C.
WO 97132812 discloses production of hydrogen peroxide by contacting hydrogen
and oxygen in gas phase with a catalyst at a temperature up to 100°C
and a pressure up to
100 bar. Although it is possible to achieve a high reaction rate it has,
however, been found
that this process cannot readily be operated under stable conditions,
particularly if it is de-
sirable to obtain hydrogen peroxide at high concentration.
The object of the present invention is to provide a process for production of
hydro
gen peroxide from hydrogen and oxygen which enables operation under stable
conditions
and preferably also formation of the hydrogen peroxide in high concentrations.

CA 02315618 2000-06-20
WO 99/32398 PGT/SE9$/02442
2
It has been found that the reaction beiwasn hydrogen and oxygen is highly exo-
thermic and that the reaction rate increases rapidly with the temperature.
Therefore, it is
very difficult to operate the process under stable conditions and avoid
uncontrolled fluctua-
dons of the reaction, particularly if a high concentration of hydrogen
peroxide is to be ob-
tamed. According to the invention it has been found that stable operation is
possible if the
temperature difference between incoming and outgoing gas from the reactor is
minimised.
Thus, the invention concerns a prowess of continuously producing hydrogen per
oxide by direct reaction between hydrogen and oxygen in a gaseous reaction
mixture in
contact with a catalyst maintained in a reactor wherein, a gaseous reaction
mixture con-
twining hydrogen and oxygen is supplied to the reactor through an inlet and
hydrogen
peroxide enriched gas is withdrawn from the reactor through an outlet. The
temperature
difference in the gaseous reaction mixture in contact with the catalyst
between a position
just after the inlet to the reactor and a position at the outlet of the
reactor is maintained
below about 40°C, preferably below 25°C, most preferably below
15°C. Although it in
principle is possible to operate the reactor under substantially isothermic
conditions, it is
preferred to maintain a temperature of the reaction mixture at the outlet that
is at least
about 2°C, most preferably at least about 5°C higher than the
temperature at the inlet of
the reactor. Suitably the temperature of the reaction mixture is maintained
above the
freezing point of any component therein, most preferably above -10°C.
The pressure is
suitably maintained below 100 bar, preferably from about 3 to about 70 bar,
most pref
erably from about 8 to about 50 bar.
According to the invention it has also been found that unless the temperature
is
suffiaentiy high only very low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide can be
dissolved in the
gas stream and it is then necessary to design the equipment for a very high
gas flow. AI-
though it is possible to operate the process at low temperatures of the
reaction mixture in
contact with the catalyst, for example from about 0 to about 100°C or
from about 20 to
about 80°C, it has been found favourable to maintain a temperature
above 105°C, prefer
ably above 110°C, particularly above 115°C, and most preferably
above 120°C. It has also
surprisingly been found that the selectivity of the reaction is fully
satisfactory also at tem-
peratures above 105°C. For safety reasons the temperature is suitably
maintained below
about 200°C, preferably bel~v about 180°C. It is normally
possible to operate without supp-
lying heat from external souroes but only utilising the heat produced by the
reaction bet-
wean hydrogen and oxygen.
The process is suitably carried out by continuously feeding hydrogen and
oxygen
into a gaseous reaction mixture flowing through the reactor containing a
catalyst and ob-
taining a hydrogen peroxide enriched gas at the outlet of the reactor. The
oxygen may be

CA 02315618 2000-06-20
WO 99/32398 PCT/SE98/02442
3
supplied as substantially pure gas or in the form of an oxygen containing gas
such as air.
Preferably the reacfion mcontains from about 2 to about 97 mot% of oxygen most
preferably from about 4 to about 70 mol%. It has been found that the safety of
the process
increases if the oxygen concentration is maintained below about 5 mol%. High
hydrogen
concentration favours the hydrogen peroxide pnxiuc~tion but may also involve
safety prob-
lems. Therefore, it is pn3ferred to operate at a hydrogen concentration in the
reaction mix-
ture below the detonation limit at about 15 mol°~, and most pn#ened to
operate below the
explosion limit at about 5 mol%. The minimum concentration of hydrogen in the
reaction
mixture in the reactor is suitably about 1 mol°rb, preferably about 2
mol%. If the reaction
mixture runs out of hydrogen there is a risk for oxidation and passivation of
the catalyst.
The Process is Particularly safe if both the hydrogen concentration and the
oxygen corxen-
tration are below about 5 mol%. It is pn~femad to operate so to obtain a
hydrogen peroxide
enriched gas containing more than 0.2 moi%, preferably more than 0.3 mol%,
most pref
erably more than 0.4 mol% of hydrogen peroxide. For safety reasons it is
pn3femed not to
exceed about 5 mol% of hydrogen peroxide in the gas. Preferably the process is
operated
at a limited conversion degn3e of hydrogen in the reactor to obtain a
diftlerence in the per
c~ntage of hydrogen in the reaction mixture at the inlet compared to the
outlet of the reao-
for bek~uv about 0.7 mol%, most pn~ferably below about 0.4 mol°~, but
preferably at least
about 0.01 moi%, most proferably at least about 0.07 mol%. For example, if the
hydrogen
concentration at the inlet of the reactor is 3.50 mol% the concentration at
the outlet is pref
erably from 2.8 to 3.49 mol%, most preferably from 3.1 to 3.43 mol%. In
addition to hydro-
gen, oxygen and hydrogen peroxide the reaction mixture normally contains
nitrogen andlor
other substantially inert gases.
The catalyst is preferably solid and preferably comprises a catalytically
active ma
terial deposited on a support. It may be in the forth of a fixed particle bed,
for example with
an average particle size from about 0.1 to about 10 mm, preferably from about
0.3 to about
5 mm, in the form of sections of monoliths, or as a fluidized bed for example
with an aver
age particle size from about 0.02 to about 1 mm, preferably from about 0.1 to
about 0.5
mm. The particles can be spherical or non-spherical and the size is defined as
the small
est dimension cross the particle. It is also possible to use a catalyst in the
form of a net or
a foil.
The process suitably comprises a step of treating at Isast a portion of the
hydro-
gen peroxide enriched gas from the outlet of the reactor to recover hydrogen
peroxide and
pn3ferably also cool the gas and then nacirarlating ~ back to the reactor. The
total pn3ssure
of the gas during this treatment should preferably deviate with less than
about 25%, most
preferably with less than about 15% from total pressure of the gas in the
reactor which

CA 02315618 2000-06-20
WO 99/32398 PGT/SE98/02441
4
saves energy and irnestment costs for compressing the hydrogen peroxide
enriched gas.
Most preferably the treatment is performed at substantially the same pressurae
as main-
tained in the reactor. The hydrogen peroxide may be rocovered from the gas by
cooling
condensation and/or absorption in any suitable solvent such as water or an
aqueous hy-
drogen peroxide solution. This liquid may contain small amounts of
conventional additives
in order to prevent decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. Preferably the gas is
frosted with
an aqueous medium wherein absorption of hydrogen peroxide and cooling occurs
simulta-
neously. A high degn3e of cooling enables produc~on of more concentrated
hydrogen per
oxide solution and the temperature difference between frosted and untreated
gas is pref
erably from about 20 to about 120'C, most preferably from about 40 to about
100'C. Nor
mally it is possible to obtain an aqueous solution containing up to about 90
weight, pref
erably from about 20 to about 70 weight9~6 of hydrogen peroxide which
eliminates the need
for distillation or other expensive steps of further concentrating the
product.
In on-site production of hydrogen peroxide it is possible dispense with the
above
recovery step and react hydrogen peroxide gas with any suitable agent directly
in a me
dium where it is intended to be used.
It has been found possible to maintain a aufficiendy low temperature
differonce
within the reaction mucture by leading thermal energy produced during the
reaction between
hydrogen and oxygen from the hydr9ogen peroxide enriched gas at the outlet of
the reactor
to the reaction mbchrre before it enters or when it just has enten3d the
reactor. This can be
achieved in several ways as will be described below.
In a preferred embodiment, enabling both stable operation of the process and
pro-
duction of hydrogen peroxide at high concentrations without using equipment of
extremely
large dimensions, the process comprises a step of recirculating a portion of
the hydrogen
peroxide enriched gas from the outlet of the reactor, preferably from about 40
to about
95°~, most preferably from about 80 to about 90°~b, back to the
reactor without recovering
hydrogen peroxide therefrom and preferably without cooling the gas, thereby
leading ther-
mal ener8y produced during the reaction back for heating the reaction mixture
entering the
reactor. The rearculating gas may, if necessary, be cooled with an external
cooling me-
dium, but normally it is preferred just to mix that gas with a portion of or
all the cooled gas
from a hydrogen peroxide recovery step to form a reaction mixture and then
introduce that
mbcture into the reactor. As an alternative or as a complement, cooled gas
from a hydrogen
peroxide recovery step may also be added to the reaction mixture by introduang
it directly
into the reactor at one or several feed points along the reactor andlor
between separate
sections of the reactor. Fresh hydrogen and oxygen or oxygen containing gas
may be

CA 02315618 2000-06-20
WO ~~~~ PGT/SE98/02442
-
added into any of the gas stroams, although addition to the roaction mixturo
jusf before it
enters the roactor is preferrod.
In another embodiment cooling can be arranged by letting the gas pass through
a sequence of modules each comprising a catalyst bed and one or several of the
follow
5 ing functions: cooling zone (diroct or indirect), absorption zone and feed
zone of hydro-
gen and/or oxygen. The latter function serves the purpose of roducing the
total drculation
gas flow. Suitably the number of modules aro from 2 to about 100, proferably
from about
4 to about 15 and the gas from the last module is proferably rocirculated back
to the first
one.
It has also been found that use of a fluidaed bed of catalyst particles
fadlitates
stable operation since part of the heated particles in the fluidized bed aro
rodrculaflng
within the roactor to lead thermal enemy from the hydrogen peroxide enriched
gas at the
outlet to the cooler roacaon mixture dose to the inlet of the roactor. It is
easy to maintain a
substantially uniform temperaturo within the roadion mixture even if the
roacfion mixture
entering the roador is significantly cooler than the reaction mixturo alroady
in contact with
the catalyst. It is possible to operate a fluidized bed at a higher conversion
degree of hy-
drogen than other types of roactors. Proferably the differonae in the
percentage of hydro-
gen in the roaction maturo at the inlet compared to the outlet of the roactor
is from about
0.3 to about 3 mol%, most preferably about 0.6 to about 2 mol%.
Low temperaturo gradients within the roaction mixture can also be achieved in
a
roactor having a fixed catalyst bed made up of particles or secfions of
monoliths if the bed
has suffidenfly high heat conductivity for leading thermal energy back from
the part of the
bed dose to the outlet of the roactor back to the beginning of the bed,
particularly if the re-
actor is comparatively short, for example below about 0.5 m, proferably below
about 0.1 m.
Also these kinds of roadors can be operated at a comparatively high conversion
degree of
hydrogen. Preferably, the difference in the percentage of hydrogen in the
roadion mixture
at the inlet compared to the outlet of such a short roactor is from about 0.3
to about 3
mol°~, most preferably about 0.6 to about 2 mol% comparod to reactor
inlet.
Besides adiabatic operation, cooling can also be achieved by releasing roacdon
heat from the catalyst to the adjacent gas stream or cooling by deposition of
the catalyst
on the wall of a heat transfer surtace, dirodly chilled with a circulating
cooling medium
such as water, e.g. from the other side. This concept offers good temperature
control.
The roactor may, if necessary, comprise means for cooling the gaseous reaction
mixturo with an external cooling medium. It is then preferrod to maintain a
temperaturo dif
feronce between the cooling medium and the reaction macturo below about
40°C, profec

CA 02315618 2000-06-20
WO 99/32398 PCT/SE98/OZ442
6
ably below about 25'C, most pnaferably below about 15'C. If necessary, it is
also possible
to further heat the reaction mixture before it enters the n3ador.
The catalytically active material may comprise one or more pn3cious metals,
pref
erably selected from group Vltl metals or gold, most proferably palladium,
platinum or mix-
tunes thenaof. Most pn3ferably the active material is a mixture of from about
90 to 100 % by
weight of palladium and from 0 to about 10% by weight of plaatinum. The
catalytically active
material may also be a less active material such as nickel, which increases
the selectivity of
the reaction.
It has been found that a low total surface area of the catalyst support
favours the
selectivity of the reaction. Suitably the BET area of the support is below
about 80 mZ per ml
reactor volume, preferably below about 20 m~ per ml reactor volume, most
preferably below
about 5 ms per ml reactor volume, and particularly preferably below about 1 m=
per ml re-
actor volume. It is also suitable to arrange the catalytically active material
without such a
catalyst support. Prefer ed arrangements of the catalytically active material
are in the form
of beds of porous partldes, porous metal foams and wire loth. In crier to
obtain suffi-
aently high pr~odudion the area of the catalytically active material suitably
exceeds about
0.00005 ms, preferably 0.01 m2, prreferabty about 0.2 mz per ml reactor volume
as meas-
ur~ed by chemisorption of carbon monoxide or any other suitable gas. The term
"reactor
vdume" refers to the total volume of the reactor inducting the space occupied
by the cata-
lyat.
A great many materials may be used for the support such as silica, silicate,
alu-
mina, carbon, aluminium silicate such as zeolite, carbonates of alkaline earth
metals such
as magnesium, caldum, barium or strontium, .oxides of magnesium, aluminium,
titanium or
zirconium, or carbides of magnesium, silicon, aluminium, titanium, zirconium,
ceramic ma-
terials or organic polymers. Preferred organic polymers contain hydroxy
groups, carbox-
ylic groups, sulfonic groups, amine groups, quaternary ammonium groups and/or
other
polar groups. Preferred support materials are selected from glass, quartz,
substantially
pure silica or substantially pure aluminium oxide. Low surface area supports
are preferred
such as non-porous beads or materials having a surface area below about 20 m2
per gram,
most preferably below about 5 m2 per gram. If the support is porous it is
preferred that the
pores are fairly large and preferably pores with a diameter exceeding about 10
nm, most
preferably exceeding about 20 nm constitutes more than about 50%, most
preferably about
80°~ of the total pore volume.
The catalyst can be prepared with any known method, such as those descxibed in
EP 878235 and the earlier mentioned US patent 5338531 and J. R. Kosak
(DuPont), 'A

CA 02315618 2000-06-20
WO 99/32398 PCT/SE98/0244Z
7
Novel Fixed Bed Catalyst for the Diroct Combination of H2 and OT to HzOZ",
Chem. Ind.
(Dekker), 1995, Vol. 82, Catalysis of Organic Reactions.
In order to improve the aetecGvity ~ may be favourable to dope the catalyst
surface
with a mineral aad such as HCI, HBr, HI, H,PO,, HzSO, or mixtures thereof and,
if ne~s
sary, continuously add small amourtts of the aad or adds to the gas stroam
flowing into the
reactor, for example in quantifies equal to losses of these additives leaving
the roactor with
the exit gas.
The invention will now be further described in connection to the Figuro
schemati-
cally showing a proferred embodiment.
A gaseous roaction mixturo having a profemed temperature of about 110-130'C, a
profen ed absolute pn~ssuro of about 13-17 bars and proferably comprising
about 40-60
moI% oxygen, about 3-4 mol% hydrogen and about 0.7-1.1 mol% hydrogen peroxide,
the
balance preferably being nitrogen and/or other inert gases, is introduced into
a reactor 1 at
an inlet 2. In the reactor 1 the reaction mixture is contacted with a catalyst
wheroin oxygen
and hydrogen reacts to hydrogen peroxide. At an outlet 3 gas preferably
containing about
0.8-1.2 mol% hydrogen peroxide leaves the roactor 1 and is then divided into
one rearcula-
tion line 4 and one line 5 leading to a combined cooler and absorber 8.
Preferably about 10-
20% of the gas from the roador 1 is transferrod to the absorber 8 in which it
is contacted
with water absorbing the hydrogen peroxide while unroactad hydrogen, oxygen
and inert
gases pass through the absorber 8. An aqueoua solution of hydrogen peroxide is
arculating
through line 7 and a cooler 9. A part of the arculating hydrogen peroxide
solution is with-
drawn as a product 8 while the romaining solution is recinxrlated to the
absorber 6. Fresh
water 10 is supplied at the top of the absorber 6. The gas passing through the
absorber 6 is
preferably cooled therein to about 40-80'C and is then conducted through a
demister 11.
FnaUy the cooled gas is mixed at a mixing point 13 with the gas from the
arculation line 4
and supplied with make up hydrogen 14 and oxygen 15 to form a roac~ion mixturo
which is
introduced into the roactor 1 at the inlet 2. If any inert gas is fed together
with the make up
hydrogen 14 or oxygen 15 a corresponding amount of gas should be withdrawn
through
line 12 situated after the demister 11 but beforo the mixing point 13.
The process is further described through the following Example, which however
does not limit the scope of the invention.
EXAMPLE: A c~atadyst was propared by impregnating glass wool with palladium
chloride and hexachloro platinic aad followed by reduction in hydrogen at
300'C. 50 mg of
the palladium impregnated glass wool was mixed with 250 mg none-impregnated
glass
wool and placed in a cylindrical reactor (6.3 mm inner diameter) to form a 30
mm long fibre
bed supported by a disk with 0.2 Nm openings. A gas mixture of 3 mol%
hydrogen, 50

CA 02315618 2000-06-20
WO 99/31398 PCT/SE98I02442
8 -
mol% oxygen and 47 mol% nitrogen was bubbled through an aqueous bath
containing 1
wt% HzSO, and 20 wt ppm NaBr at 30 N litn3lh and then fed to the reactor. The
gas at
the exit of the reactor was bubbled through an aqueous bath of 1 wt°~
HzSO, to absorb
the hydrogen peroxide therein. After 100 minutes operation at an absolute
prossure of 20
bars and a temperature of about 80-100'C 4.4 mg hydrogen peroxide had formed.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2004-02-24
(86) PCT Filing Date 1998-12-22
(87) PCT Publication Date 1999-07-01
(85) National Entry 2000-06-20
Examination Requested 2000-06-20
(45) Issued 2004-02-24
Deemed Expired 2010-12-22

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $400.00 2000-06-20
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2000-06-20
Application Fee $300.00 2000-06-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2000-12-22 $100.00 2000-06-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2001-12-24 $100.00 2001-11-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2002-12-23 $100.00 2002-11-25
Final Fee $300.00 2003-10-30
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2003-12-22 $150.00 2003-12-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2004-12-22 $200.00 2004-12-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2005-12-22 $200.00 2005-12-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2006-12-22 $200.00 2006-11-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2007-12-24 $200.00 2007-11-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2008-12-22 $250.00 2008-12-01
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
AKZO NOBEL N.V.
Past Owners on Record
HERRMANN, WOLFGANG
NYSTROM, MATS
WANNGARD, JOHAN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2000-06-20 8 495
Representative Drawing 2000-09-19 1 3
Claims 2003-03-31 4 117
Representative Drawing 2003-05-08 1 11
Cover Page 2004-01-23 2 47
Abstract 2000-06-20 1 56
Claims 2000-06-20 2 116
Drawings 2000-06-20 1 28
Cover Page 2000-09-19 1 43
Assignment 2000-06-20 4 179
PCT 2000-06-20 11 361
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-12-19 3 80
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-03-31 8 212
Correspondence 2003-10-30 2 41