Canadian Patents Database / Patent 2704678 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2704678
(54) English Title: METHODS FOR FUEL-EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION OF CARGO BY AIRCRAFT
(54) French Title: PROCEDES DE TRANSPORT DE CHARGEMENT A BON RENDEMENT ENERGETIQUE PAR AVION
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B64C 1/22 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HELOU, ELIE, JR. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • BIOSPHERE AEROSPACE, LLC (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • HELOU, ELIE, JR. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: WILSON LUE LLP
(74) Associate agent: WILSON LUE LLP
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2008-10-07
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2009-05-14
Examination requested: 2013-10-08
(30) Availability of licence: N/A
(30) Language of filing: English

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
11/935,328 United States of America 2007-11-05

English Abstract




A fuel-efficient method for transporting cargo to
a desired location via an aircraft. The method comprises
determining the weight of the cargo capable of being transported in a
single container, selecting a container having a sufficient weight
capacity to support the cargo based on the determined weight of
the cargo, and filing the selected container with the cargo. The
filled container is loaded onto a location on the aircraft beam
relative to the aircraft's CG based on the weight of the filled
container to stay within the acceptable CG range for the aircraft. The
filled containers having the greater weight are positioned on the
beam at or adjacent to the aircraft's CG and the filled containers
having lower weight are positioned farther from the aircraft's
CG. The containers provide strength and rigidity to the beam to
sustain the bending and torsional bads in flight.


French Abstract

L'invention porte sur un procédé à bon rendement énergétique pour transporter un chargement vers une destination souhaitée par avion. Le procédé comprend la détermination du poids du chargement qui peut être transporté dans un seul conteneur, le choix d'un conteneur ayant une capacité en poids suffisante pour supporter le chargement sur la base du poids déterminé du chargement, et le remplissage du conteneur choisi avec le chargement. Le conteneur rempli est chargé sur un emplacement du longeron d'avion par rapport au centre de gravité (CG) de l'avion sur la base du poids du conteneur rempli afin de rester à l'intérieur de la plage de CG acceptable pour l'avion. Les conteneurs remplis ayant le poids le plus élevé sont positionnés sur le longeron ou adjacents au CG de l'avion et les conteneurs remplis ayant des poids inférieurs sont positionnés plus loin du CG de l'avion. Les conteneurs fournissent une résistance et une rigidité au longeron afin de supporter les charges de torsion et de flexion pendant le vol.


Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



13
Claims:

1. A fuel-efficient method for transporting cargo to a desired location
via an aircraft having a forward fuselage, an empennage, wings, and a beam
structure connecting the forward fuselage and the empennage, the aircraft
having
a center of gravity (CG) range acceptable for flight, the method comprising:
determining the weight of the cargo capable of being transported in
a single container;
selecting a container having a sufficient weight capacity to support
the cargo based on the determined weight of the cargo;
filling the selected container with the cargo;
loading the filled container onto a location on the aircraft beam
relative to the aircraft's CG based on the weight of the filled container to
maintain the aircraft CG within the range acceptable for flight;
wherein the filled containers having the higher weight are positioned
on the beam at or adjacent to the aircraft's CG;
wherein filled containers having lower total weight are positioned
farther from the aircraft's CG; and
wherein the filled containers provide strength and rigidity to the
aircraft beam to sustain the bending and torsional loads in flight when it is
loaded onto the aircraft beam.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprises adjusting the CG of the
loaded aircraft by changing the location on the beam where the containers are
placed.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprises providing customized
individual environmental controls to each of the containers.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the environmental controls include
temperature and pressure controls.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein temperature control is provided by a
heating grid contained within the container and an electrical connection from
the
aircraft to the heating grid.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein temperature control is provided by
feeding bleed air from the aircraft engine into the container.



14

7. The method of claim 4, wherein pressure control is provided by
regulating input of bleed air fed from the aircraft engine into the container
and
output of air from the container exit port.
8. The method of claim 1 further comprising coupling together filled
containers having approximately the same total weight before the step of
loading
the filled container onto the aircraft beam.
9. The method of claim 1 further comprising detachably mounting the
containers onto the beam of the aircraft.
10. The method of claim 9 further comprising detachably attaching
together adjacent containers.
11. The method of claim 1 further comprising
determining wind conditions relative to the direction of travel of the
cargo drone aircraft in flight;
adjusting the engine output of the cargo drone aircraft based on the
determined wind conditions;
causing a reduction of the engine output of the cargo drone aircraft
upon determining the existence of a favorable wind condition; and
resuming engine output of the cargo drone aircraft upon determining
the absence of a favorable wind condition.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the favorable wind condition is an
updraft or lift.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the favorable wind condition is a
wind having a direction that is substantially the same as the direction of
travel of
the cargo drone aircraft in flight.
14. The method of claim 11, wherein the favorable wind condition is a
wind having a direction substantially toward the final destination.
15. A fuel-efficient method for flying a cargo drone aircraft having a
forward fuselage, an empennage, wings, and a beam structure connecting the
forward fuselage and the empennage, the method comprising:
determining wind conditions relative to the direction of travel of the
cargo drone aircraft;




adjusting the engine output of the cargo drone aircraft based on the
determined wind condition;
causing a reduction of the engine output of the cargo drone aircraft
upon determining the existence of a favorable wind condition; and
resuming engine output of the cargo drone aircraft upon determining
the absence of a favorable wind condition.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the favorable wind condition is an
updraft or lift.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the favorable wind condition is a
wind having a direction that is substantially the same as the direction of
travel of
the cargo drone aircraft in flight.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein the favorable wind condition is a
wind having a direction substantially toward the final destination.

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
1

Title
METHODS FOR FUEL-EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION OF CARGO BY
AIRCRAFT

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The field of the present invention is cargo aircraft for transporting modular
containers.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Throughout aviation history, there has been a drive to make air
transportation faster, more efficient and more cost effective. The basic
parameters relevant to this objective include aerodynamics, engine efficiency
and
structural weight. Since airplanes are most commonly used for transporting
passengers, these parameters are optimized to provide safe, high-speed travel,
at
the cost of being expensive and providing poorer aerodynamic and fuel
efficiency.
For example, passenger airlines use jet engines which provide much higher
thrust
than propellers and are naturally efficient at higher altitudes, being able to
operate
above 40,000 feet. Jet engines, however, are not as fuel efficient as piston
engines or turboprops. Because aircraft of a size capable of carrying
substantial
cargo have typically been designed first as passenger aircraft, air cargo
systems
remain both expensive and inconvenient.
Another important consideration to air cargo systems is the significant
cargo weight that is added to the aircraft before flight. Adding weight to an
aircraft
negatively impacts the fuel economy. Moreover, the placement of the added
weight relative to the aircraft's center of gravity (CG) is critical to its
flight-
readiness. Each aircraft has a predetermined range of acceptable CG which must
be maintained in order to provide stability and control of the aircraft in
flight. Most
airplanes have a small range of acceptable CG, usually about 20-30% mean
aerodynamic chord (MAC) of an airplane's wing. Thus, the loading and placement
of cargo containers onto the aircraft is significant to its flight-readiness.


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
2

Unfortunately, it is often difficult to accurately determine the placement of
cargo
containers, as they typically come in a wide variety of shapes, sizes and
weight.
The inability of aircraft to participate in intermodal container cargo systems
has been disadvantageous to international commerce. The increasing
globalization of business and communication has given rise to a greater demand
for more rapid international shipping than can be provided by convention
ships.

SUMMARY
The present invention is directed to fuel efficient methods for transporting
cargo to a desired location via an aircraft. Because the aircraft that is used
in
connection with the methods disclosed herein are designed primarily for the
transportation of cargo and not passengers, the aircraft need not be
constrained
by the same safety and speed requirements demanded of passenger airlines. For
example, the aircraft may be a cargo drone. A cargo drone can take-off, fly
and
land without a pilot on board and, instead, may be controlled by a remotely
located command center that is able to track and monitor the path of the cargo
drone by known global positioning satellite (GPS) systems.
Because the cargo drone does not require a pilot or crew on board, flight
times are no longer constrained by considerations of avoiding pilot and crew
fatigue. Thus, a cargo drone can fly at more fuel-efficient low speeds for
long
distances and at lower altitudes. Because speed is no longer a concern, the
cargo drone may utilize a more fuel efficient engine, such as a piston engine
or a
turboprop, and fly at altitudes significantly lower than that required of jet
engine
airlines. The use of a piston or turboprop engine, in turn, allows for the
possibility
of utilizing renewable fuel, such as biodiesel, which is not suitable for use
with jet
engines. The cargo drone may therefore be designed for highly efficient flight
profiles without needing to accommodate a crew and passengers.
Moreover, the drone aircraft may be equipped with the capability of
assessing various weather patterns, to take advantage of these weather
patterns
in modulating the engine output required for flight, thereby providing greater
fuel
efficiency. Accordingly, the drone aircraft may be equipped with sensors which
are capable of determining the wind direction, strength, and speed and adjust


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
3

engine output accordingly. If a favorable wind condition is detected by the
sensors, then the engine output may be reduced or turned off so as to enable
the
cargo drone aircraft to glide. When the favorable wind condition is no longer
detected by the sensors, the engine may resume its normal mode of operating to
power the cargo drone aircraft in flight. Examples of favorable wind
conditions
include an updraft or lift and a wind having a direction and speed
substantially in
the same direction of travel or its final destination. Glider airplanes are
known to
take advantage of upwardly rising air instead of an engine for flight and
certain
glider airplanes are provided with engines which can be started if conditions
no
longer support a soaring flight. However, this method of flying relies on the
existence of a pilot in the aircraft and thus has not been used for drone
aircrafts
used for transporting cargo.
The cargo drone suitable for use in connection with the disclosed methods
are constructed with the minimal structural requirement, including a forward
fuselage, an empennage, a beam structure connecting the forward fuselage to
the
empennage, and wings attached to the beam structure. Cargo drones suitable for
use in connection with the methods are also disclosed in commonly-owned U.S.
Patent No. 7,261,257, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully
set
forth herein. The beam structure is designed to be as light as possible and
the
cargo containers are designed to provide the added strength to the beam
structure to sustain the various forces which are exerted upon the aircraft in
flight.
Additional savings in weight are provided by the methods disclosed herein.
in accordance with one embodiment, a fuel-efficient method for
transporting cargo to a desired location via an aircraft is provided. The
method
comprises determining the weight of the cargo capable of being transported in
a
single container, selecting a container having a sufficient weight capacity to
support the cargo based on the determined weight of the cargo, and filling the
selected container with the cargo.
The filled container is then loaded onto a location on the aircraft beam
relative to the aircraft's CG based on the weight of the filled container to
stay
within the acceptable CG range for the aircraft. The filled containers having
the
greater weight are positioned on the beam at or adjacent to the aircraft's CG
and


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
4

the filled containers having lower weight are positioned farther from the
aircraft's
CO. Once the aircraft is fully loaded, the filled containers provide strength
and
rigidity to the aircraft beam to sustain the bending and torsional loads in
flight
when it is loaded onto the aircraft beam.
In a first aspect of the embodiment, the method further comprises adjusting
the CG of the loaded aircraft by changing the location on the beam where the
containers are placed.
In a second aspect of the embodiment, the method further comprises
providing customized individual environmental controls to each of the
containers.
In a third aspect of the embodiment, the method environmental controls
include temperature and pressure controls.
In a fourth aspect of the embodiment, the temperature control is provided
by a heating grid contained within the container and an electrical connection
from
the aircraft to the heating grid.
In a fifth aspect of the embodiment, the temperature control is provided by
feeding bleed air from the aircraft engine into the container.
In a sixth aspect of the embodiment, pressure control is provided by
regulating input of bleed air fed from the aircraft engine into the container
and
output of. air from the container exit port.
In a seventh aspect of the embodiment, the method further comprises
coupling together filled containers having approximately the same total weight
before the step of loading the filled container onto the aircraft beam.
In an eighth aspect of the embodiment, the method further comprises
detachably mounting the containers onto the beam of the aircraft.
In a ninth aspect of the embodiment, the method further comprises
detachably attaching together adjacent containers.
In a tenth aspect of the embodiment, the method further comprises
determining wind conditions relative to the direction of travel of the cargo
drone
aircraft in flight and adjusting the engine output of the cargo drone aircraft
based
on the determined wind direction and wind speed. Upon determining the
existence of a favorable wind condition, the engine output of the cargo drone


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066

aircraft is reduced. Upon determining the absence of a favorable wind
direction,
the engine output of the cargo drone aircraft is resumed.
In an eleventh aspect of the embodiment, the favorable wind condition is an
updraft or a lift.
5 In a twelfth aspect of the embodiment, the favorable wind condition is a
wind having a direction that is substantially the same as the direction of
travel of
the cargo drone aircraft in flight.
In a thirteenth aspect of the embodiment, the favorable wind condition is a
wind having a direction substantially toward the final destination.
In accordance with another embodiment, a fuel-efficient method for flying a
cargo drone aircraft is provided. The method comprises determining wind
conditions relative to the direction of travel of the cargo drone aircraft,
adjusting
the engine output of the cargo drone aircraft based on the determined wind
direction and wind speed, causing a reduction of the engine output of the
cargo
drone aircraft upon determining the existence of a favorable wind condition,
and
resuming engine output of the cargo drone aircraft upon determining the
absence
of a favorable wind condition.
In first aspect of the embodiment, the favorable wind condition is an updraft
or a lift.
In a second aspect of the embodiment, the favorable wind condition is a
wind having a direction that is substantially the same as the direction of
travel of
the cargo drone aircraft in flight.
In a third aspect of the embodiment, the favorable wind condition is a wind
having a direction substantially toward the final destination.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved
cargo aircraft. Other and further objects and advantages will appear
hereinafter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram showing exemplary steps of the method for
transporting cargo to a desired location via an aircraft.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of cargo container that is used to transport
liquids or other high pressure cargo.


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
6

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of combinations of cargo containers that may
fit within a defined cargo area.
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a cargo drone aircraft.
FIG. 5 is a partial perspective view with portions broken away for clarity of
the aircraft of FIG. 4.
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a cargo drone aircraft
with a ducting system.
FIG. 7 is a perspective view of the ducting system depicted in the cargo
drone aircraft of FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 is illustrates the various forces that act upon an aircraft in flight
and
show the approximate location of the aircraft's CG.
FIG. 9 is a partial side cross-sectional view of a partially loaded aircraft
having a plurality of containers of different weights loaded onto the aircraft
beam.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Figure 1 is a flow diagram showing exemplary steps of a method 100 for
transporting cargo to a desired location via an aircraft. As shown in step
110, the
weight of cargo that is capable of being transported in a single container is
determined. Since containers are available in a number of different standard
sizes, the weight of the cargo to be transported will depend on the size of
the
desired container that will be used to transport it. Intermodal containers,
for
example, are available in a number of standard lengths, such as 20, 40, 45,
48,
and 53 ft, and container capacity is typically measured in twenty-foot
equivalent
units. Because containers are available in a wide range of dimensions, there
is
flexibility with respect to whether and how cargo may be apportioned out among
any number of containers.
Once the total weight of the cargo is determined, a container having the
appropriate maximum weight capacity and environmental controls is selected
112.
Since the containers are customized to accommodate a range of maximum weight
capacities, the strength and weight of each container will depend on the
maximum
weight capacity the container is intended to accommodate. Containers having
higher weight capacities have higher structural strength to support the cargo
load


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
7

and will therefore be heavier than containers having lower weight capacities.
The
ability to adjust the weight of the containers in accordance with the weight
of the
cargo provides a significant advantage of reducing the total weight of the
loaded
aircraft in flight. This, in turn, providing greater fuel efficiency for the
aircraft and
lower operational costs.
The containers may also provide optional environmental controls which
may be required by certain types of cargo. Because the aircraft will be flying
for
extended time periods and at high altitudes, the cargo onboard will likely
experience significant changes in temperature and pressure. Such environmental
changes may be harmful to certain types of cargo, such as live animals,
foodstuffs
and certain chemicals or liquids. Thus, the containers may be equipped with
environmental controls that are selected and customized for the type of cargo
that
the container is carrying.
Figure 2 depicts an embodiment of a container 200 that may be used to
transport liquids or other cargo requiring higher pressurization. The
container 200
generally comprises a rounded inner vessel 205 and an outer support spine 210
which is specially designed to help carry and transfer the normal structural
load.
The rounded inner vessel 205 is shaped and configured to hold the cargo and
maintain the required pressure.
The selected container is then filled with the cargo in accordance with the
container specifications 114. The container specifications may provide
instructions as to how the container may be properly filled, such as the
maximum
weight capacity, proper weight distribution of the cargo within the container,
and
the required volume to which the container must be filled.
Steps 112 through 114 are typically performed at the point of origin for the
cargo. Thus, once the containers are filled with the cargo, they may be
shipped to
assembly facility where the containers are tested and loaded onto the
aircraft.
Once the filled container arrives at the assembly facility, it may be
inspected and
tested to verify its flight-readiness 116. The filled containers may be
subjected to
a shake test to determine if the container was properly loaded. A pressure
test
may be conducted to verify that the container has not been structurally
compromised. A load carrying test may be conducted to verify that the
container


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
8

has the minimum structural integrity. The filled containers may also be
subjected
to x-ray inspection to determine if they contain any contraband or other
illegal
products. If the container does not pass the inspection and testing stage 116,
adjustments may be made to the container at the assembly facility or the
container may be returned to the place where it was originally filled 118.
If the containers pass the inspection and testing stage 116, the containers
may be loaded onto the aircraft individually or they may be coupled together
in
groups to form larger cargo units 120. Coupling containers into larger cargo
units
allows for faster loading of the containers onto the aircraft and reduces the
downtime of a grounded aircraft. The containers may be coupled together in
accordance with their individual total weights -- heavy weight containers
coupled
to other heavy weight containers to form a heavy weight cargo unit and light
weight containers coupled to other light weight containers to form a light
weight
cargo unit. Moreover, cargo containers of different dimensions within a given
weight range may be coupled together in any number of arrangements. Figure 3
illustrates various arrangements of cargo containers 70a-d that may fit within
a
given cargo area 80.
Each cargo unit may be defined by having individual cargo units having a
weight within a predetermined weight range. For example, the weight range for
a
heavy weight cargo unit may be approximately 30,000 to 40,000 Ibs,
approximately 20,000 to 29,999 lbs for a medium weight cargo unit, and
approximately 10,000 to 19,999 lbs for a light weight cargo unit. Larger or
smaller
weight range increments may be provided for the various cargo units depending
on the size of the containers and aircraft capacity.
Referring back to Figure 1, the cargo units may then be arranged and
mounted onto the aircraft relative to the aircraft's center of gravity (CG)
122. With
respect to the types of aircraft that may be used in connection with the
disclosed
methods, figures 4 and 5 illustrate a drone aircraft that is particularly
suitable for
use in connection with the methods.
The drone aircraft generally comprises a forward fuselage 40, an
empennage 42, a beam structure 30 connecting the forward fuselage 40 to the
empennage 42, and wings 50 attached to the beam structure 30. The forward


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
9

fuselage 40 is shown to be that of a drone with no cockpit. Since the Shuttle
SRTM mapping mission, it has been possible to have extended commercial flights
without human intervention. A cargo drone can fly at low speeds for long
distances without concern for crew time and passenger fatigue. The aircraft
can
therefore be designed for highly efficient flight profiles without
accommodation for
crew and passengers.
The details of the beam structure 30 are better illustrated in Figure 5. As
previously discussed above, the cargo containers provide strength to the beam
structure 30. The beam structure 30 is designed to be as light as possible. As
such, the beam structure 30 is capable of supporting takeoff loads, flight
loads
and landing loads of the aircraft when free of cargo. Additionally, the beam
structure 30 must be sufficient to support compression loads upon landing even
when fully loaded. However, the beam structure 30 is not required to fully
sustain
bending and torsional loads in flight, landing and takeoff when a rigid cargo
container or multiple such containers are in place in the aircraft. The
additional
rigidity required is supplied by the cargo containers. To this end, the
containers
are constructed with sufficient structure and rigidity and are securely
mounted to
the beam structure 30 such that bending and torsional forces experienced by
the
beam structure 30 are imposed upon the securely mounted container or
containers.
The beam structure 30 includes a floor 32 which may include rollers and/or
antifriction devices to facilitate longitudinal movement of a cargo container
along
the surface of the floor 32. Restraining flanges 33 run along each
longitudinal
side of the floor 32. In addition to the floor 32, the beam structure 30
includes I-
beams 34 with bulkheads 36, 38 positioned periodically along the beam
structure
and affixed to the floor 32 and the l-beams 34. The beam structure 30
becomes a rigid structure which is preferably sufficient to support the
aircraft in
flight when empty but cannot support the aircraft in flight when loaded.
Corner
elements 64 may also be provided to augment the structural rigidity to the
beam
30 structure 30 and to retain optional fairing panels 66 and 68.
An empennage 42 is attached to the other end of the beam structure 30.
The empennage 42 includes laterally extending horizontal stabilizers 44 with
twin


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066

vertical stabilizers 46 positioned at the outer ends of the horizontal
stabilizers 44.
The empennage 42 may be removed from association with the beam as a unit so
as to provide access to the beam structure 30.
Wings 50 are also structurally associated with the beam structure 30. The
5 wings 50 as well as the beam structure 30 may contain fuel tanks. Landing
gear
52 are provided under the wings 50; and a forward gear 54 is provided under
the
beam structure 30. The wings 50 may be removed from association with the
beam as a unit.
Engines 56 are shown in the embodiment of Figure 1 to be directly
10 mounted to the beam structure 30. The engines 56 may be mounted anywhere
relative to the beam structure 30 so long as the aircraft CG remains within a
range
that is acceptable for flight. The engines 56 may each be removed from
association with the beam as a unit.
Mounts may be provided on the beam structure 30. These mounts may be
bolted or otherwise retained on the floor 32. Further, incremental adjustments
are
preferably provided in order that the mounts can attach to the container or
containers, while accommodating variations in container length and placement.
Such incremental adjustment may be provided by patterns of attachment holes in
the floor 32 to allow for lateral or longitudinal repositioning of the mounts
once the
container or containers are in place. The mounts may be located or
positionable
along the full length of the floor 32 or at incremental positions reflecting
standard
container sizes.
The aircraft may further comprise a ducting system which provides the
customized environmental controls to the containers. Figures 6 and 7 show an
aircraft comprising a ducting system 600 which is configured to provide
customized environmental controls to individual containers via the container
connections 610. The connections 610 may be used to regulate the temperature
and pressure within each container. For example, the connections 610 may
provide pressure and temperature control by providing bleed air from the
engine.
Heat control may also be provided by electrical connections to power heating
elements which may be provided by the containers themselves.


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
11

The cargo containers are arranged on the aircraft beam in accordance with
their weight so as to provide the proper weight distribution to maintain the
aircraft's CG within a range acceptable for flight. Figure 8 shows the
approximate
location of an aircraft's CG. Generally, shifting the CG outside of the
acceptable
range, for example, too far forward will make the aircraft behave as if it is
nose
heavy and too far backward will make the aircraft behave tail heavy. Figure 8
also shows the various forces that act upon an aircraft in flight. A drag
force 800
is exerts a force upon the aircraft in a direction opposite of its direction
of travel
and is caused by the outside geometry of the aircraft. A thrust force 802 is
provided by the engine which also causes a moment arm depending on where the
center of thrust is located. An upward force or lift 804 is provided by the
aerodynamic center (AC) of the wing, whereas a corresponding downward force
806 is exerted by the total weight of the aircraft. As can be shown, an
aircraft's
flight efficiency may be increased by decreasing weight carried by the
aircraft
which, in turn, decreases the downward force exerted on the aircraft.
Figure 9 shows a partial side cross-sectional view of a partially loaded
aircraft 900, including the aircraft beam 910, the wings 920 and a plurality
of
containers 930, 932 and 934, each having different weights, loaded on top of
the
beam 910. As can be seen in Figure 9, the arrangement of the containers 930,
932 and 934 on the beam 910 is made relative to the aircraft's center of
gravity
950, with the heaviest container 332 located approximately at the aircraft's
CG
350 and the lightest container 330 located farther from the aircraft's CG. In
general, the heavier the cargo container, the closer it is located to the
aircraft's
CG and the lighter the cargo container, the farther it is displaced from the
aircraft's
CG.
Another reason the placement of the cargo containers on the beam
structure relative to the aircraft CG is that the cargo containers themselves
provides needed strength to the beam structure. The beam structure is designed
to be as light as possible. As such, the beam structure is capable of
supporting
takeoff loads, flight loads and landing loads of the aircraft when free of
cargo.
Additionally, the beam structure must be sufficient to support compression
loads
upon landing even when fully loaded. However, the beam structure is not


CA 02704678 2010-05-04
WO 2009/061576 PCT/US2008/079066
12

required to fully sustain bending and torsional loads in flight, landing and
takeoff
when a rigid cargo container or multiple such containers are in place in the
aircraft. The additional rigidity required is supplied by the rigid cargo
containers.
To this end, the containers are constructed with sufficient structure and
rigidity
and are securely mounted to the beam structure such that bending and torsional
forces experienced by the beam structure 30 are imposed upon the securely
mounted container or containers.
In most airplanes, the bending and torsional forces are greatest at or near
the CG, requiring greater structural strength to be added to the beam. Because
heavier containers will necessarily have a more reinforced structure than the
lighter containers, placement of the heavier containers at the aircraft's CG
will also
provide the structural strength needed for the aircraft beam to withstand the
bending and torsional forces which are exerted upon it.
Thus, improved cargo aircraft have been disclosed. While embodiments
and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be
apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications are possible
without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention,
therefore, is
not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.

A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Admin Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 2008-10-07
(87) PCT Publication Date 2009-05-14
(85) National Entry 2010-05-04
Examination Requested 2013-10-08
Dead Application 2017-02-28

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2013-10-07 FAILURE TO REQUEST EXAMINATION 2013-10-08
2016-02-29 R30(2) - Failure to Respond
2016-10-07 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Filing $400.00 2010-05-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2010-10-07 $100.00 2010-05-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2011-10-07 $100.00 2011-09-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2012-10-09 $100.00 2012-10-03
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2013-10-07 $200.00 2013-09-26
Reinstatement - failure to request examination $200.00 2013-10-08
Request for Examination $800.00 2013-10-08
Registration of Documents $100.00 2013-12-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2014-10-07 $200.00 2014-09-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2015-10-07 $200.00 2015-09-10
Current owners on record shown in alphabetical order.
Current Owners on Record
BIOSPHERE AEROSPACE, LLC
Past owners on record shown in alphabetical order.
Past Owners on Record
HELOU, ELIE, JR.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :




Filter Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)
Document
Description
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd)
Number of pages Size of Image (KB)
Description 2010-05-04 12 708
Drawings 2010-05-04 9 127
Claims 2010-05-04 3 121
Abstract 2010-05-04 1 67
Representative Drawing 2010-06-30 1 15
Cover Page 2010-07-07 2 54
Claims 2015-04-20 3 76
Description 2015-04-20 12 682
PCT 2010-05-04 3 157
Assignment 2010-05-04 3 107
Fees 2012-10-03 1 163
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-10-08 3 80
Assignment 2013-12-19 3 90
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-10-20 3 103
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-10-17 1 43
Correspondence 2014-10-17 1 43
Prosecution-Amendment 2015-04-20 8 270
Prosecution-Amendment 2015-08-27 3 232
Correspondence 2018-02-19 1 33