Language selection

Search

Patent 2760026 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2760026
(54) English Title: IMPROVEMENTS TO PARTICLE DETECTORS
(54) French Title: AMELIORATIONS APPORTEES A DES DETECTEURS DE PARTICULES
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G08B 17/107 (2006.01)
  • G01N 21/53 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KNOX, RON (Australia)
  • BOETTGER, KARL (Australia)
  • AJAY, KEMAL (Australia)
(73) Owners :
  • GARRETT THERMAL SYSTEMS LIMITED (United Kingdom)
(71) Applicants :
  • XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD (Bahamas)
(74) Agent: MACRAE & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2018-03-20
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2010-05-03
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2010-11-04
Examination requested: 2015-04-23
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/AU2010/000511
(87) International Publication Number: WO2010/124347
(85) National Entry: 2011-10-25

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2009901922 Australia 2009-05-01
2009901923 Australia 2009-05-01
2009901924 Australia 2009-05-01
2009901925 Australia 2009-05-01
2009901926 Australia 2009-05-01
2009901927 Australia 2009-05-01

Abstracts

English Abstract





A beam detector (10) including a light source (32), a receiver (34), and a
target (36), acting in co-operation to de-tect
particles in a monitored area (38). The target (36), reflects incident light
(40), resulting in reflected light (32) being returned
to receiver (34). The receiver (34) is a receiver is capable of recording and
reporting light intensity at a plurality of points across
its field of view. In the preferred form the detector (10) emits a first light
beam (3614) in a first wavelength band; a second light
beam (3618) in a second wavelength band; and a third light beam (3616) in a
third wavelength band, wherein the first and second
wavelengths bands are substantially equal and are different to the third
wavelength band.


French Abstract

La présente invention a pour objet un détecteur de faisceau (10) comprenant une source lumineuse (32), un récepteur (34), et une cible (36), agissant en coopération pour détecter des particules dans une zone surveillée (38). La cible (36) réfléchit la lumière incidente (40), ce qui engendre une lumière réfléchie (32) qui est renvoyée vers le récepteur (34). Le récepteur (34) est un récepteur capable d'enregistrer et de rapporter l'intensité lumineuse en une pluralité de points de son champ de vision. Sous la forme préférée, le détecteur (10) émet un premier faisceau lumineux (3614) dans une première bande de longueur d'onde ; un deuxième faisceau lumineux (3618) dans une deuxième bande de longueur d'onde ; et un troisième faisceau lumineux (3616) dans une troisième bande de longueur d'onde, les première et deuxième bandes de longueur d'onde étant sensiblement égales et étant différentes de la troisième bande de longueur d'onde.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


105
CLAIMS
1. A beam detector system configured to detect the presence of particles in
a monitored space, the
beam detector including:
a light source adapted to generate at least one light beam having components
in at least a first
wavelength band and a second wavelength band, wherein the light source is
configured such that the at
least one beam emitted by the light source having a first wavelength band has
a spatial intensity light
profile across the width of the beam that is different to the spatial
intensity profile in the second
wavelength band, and
an image sensor having a field of view being arranged relative to the light
source such that the at
least one beam from the light source is received at the image sensor after the
at least one beam
traverses the monitored space, and to generate output signals representing a
level of received light at
each of the first and second wavelengths within a region or regions within the
field of view of the image
sensor that include the light source,
a processor configured to receive the output signals from the image sensor and
being configured
to determine, at least partly on the basis of a relative reduction in the
received light in the second
wavelength band compared to the first wavelength band, from within the region
or regions, that particles
are impinging on the at least one beam,
wherein the spatial intensity profiles for the components of the beam in the
first wavelength band
and the second wavelength band are such that, in the event the light source
moves out of alignment with
the sensor, the level of light from the region or regions that is received by
the image sensor in the first
wavelength band decreases before the level of light received by the image
sensor in the second
wavelength band, thereby causing a relative change in received light level
that is distinguishable from
said relative reduction in the received light intensity in the second
wavelength band compared to the first
wavelength band caused by particles in the monitored space impinging on the at
least one beam
2 The beam detector of claim 1 wherein the beam width of light in the first
wavelength band is
narrower than the beam width of light in the second wavelength band.
3. The beam detector of claim 1 wherein light in a first wavelength band is
at a longer wavelength
than the second wavelength band.
4 The beam detector of claim 1 wherein the light source includes a
plurality of light emitters, each
emitter being configured to emit light in one of the first and second
wavelength bands.
The beam detector of claim 4 wherein the plurality of light emitters includes
a light emitter
corresponding to one of the first or second wavelength bands arranged to
surround one or more light
emitters corresponding to the other of the first or second wavelength bands

106
6. The beam detector of claim 4 wherein plurality of light emitters
comprise a plurality of
semiconductor dies in a common light emitting diode (LED) package.
7. The beam detector of claim 1 which includes a plurality of light sources
arranged with respect to
the image sensor, such that at least one beam from each light source is
received at the image sensor
after the at least one beam traverses the monitored space.
8. The beam detector of claim 1 wherein the detector is arranged to detect
smoke.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02760026 2016-08-05
= 1
Improvements to particle detectors
Field of the invention
The present invention relates to aspects of particle detectors. By way of
example the embodiments will be
described in relation to beam detectors adapted for detecting smoke. In one
aspect the present invention
relates more generally to battery powered devices, although the illustrative
embodiment will be described
in connection with beam detectors.
Background of the invention
Various methods of detecting particles in air are known. One method involves
projecting a beam across a
monitored area and measuring the attenuation of the beam. Such detectors are
commonly known as
'obscuration detectors', or simply 'beam detectors'.
Some beam detectors employ a co-located transmitter and receiver with a
distant reflector, and others
use a separate transmitter unit and receive a unit located on opposite sides
of the open space being
monitored.
An exemplary, conventional beam detector is shown in figure 1. The detector 10
includes a light source
and detector 12 and a reflector 14 placed either side of a monitored area 16.
Incident light 18 from the
light source and detector 12 are projected toward the reflector 14. The
reflector 14 reflects the incident
light 18 as reflected light 20 back toward the light source and detector 12.
If particulate matter enters the
monitored area 16, it will attenuate the incident light 18 and reflected light
20 and cause the amount of
light received at the light source and detector 12 to diminish. An alternative
beam detector separates the
light source from the detector and omits the reflector and directly
illuminates the detector with the light
source across the monitored area 16. Other geometries are also possible.
Whilst the mechanism of smoke detection used by beam detectors is sound, beam
detectors commonly
suffer from a number of problems.
Firstly, beam detectors may suffer a type I (false positive) error where
foreign objects or other particulate
matter, such as dust, enters the monitored area and obscure the beam. Beam
detectors are generally
unable to distinguish between the obscuration caused by particles of interest
e.g. smoke, and obscuration
which results from the presence of foreign body of no interest e.g. a bug
flying into the beam.
Secondly, beam detectors may require careful alignment at the time of
installation. Such alignment aims
to ensure that in normal conditions, free from particles, light enters the
sensor so as to capture the
majority of the transmitted beam, and to in turn maximise sensitivity to an
obscuration. This calibration

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
2
may be slow and therefore costly to perform. Moreover, it may need to be
repeated as the physical
environment changes, for example because of small movements in the structure
to which a beam
detector is attached. In some cases, if the intensity of incident light on the
detector diminishes quickly this
misalignment may also.cause a false alarm.
The inventors have proposed a system to address some of these drawbacks in
Australian provisional
patent application 2008902909, filed 10 June 2008 in the name of Xtralis
Technologies Ltd and
International Patent application PCT/AU2009/000727. An exemplary embodiment
described therein and
reproduced as figure 2 herein includes a light source 32, a receiver 34, and a
target 36, acting in co-
operation to detect particles in a monitored area 38. The target 36, e.g. a
corner cube reflects incident
light 40, resulting in reflected light 42 being returned to receiver 34. In
the preferred embodiment the
receiver 34 is preferably a video camera or other receiver having an array of
light sensors e.g. one or
more CCD (charge-coupled device) image sensors, or CMOS (complementary metal-
oxide-
semiconductor) image sensors, or indeed any device capable of recording and
reporting light intensity at
a plurality of points across its held of view.
In this system the receiver 34 receives all of the light in its field of view
51, and includes imaging optics to
form an image of a field of its view 51, including the target 36 on its image
sensor. Receiver 34 records
the intensity of light in its field of view, in the form of data representing
the image intensity at a series of
locations throughout the field of view. A portion of this data will
correspond, at least partially, to reflected
light 42. A microcontroller 54 analyses the image data, and determines which
portion of the data provides
the best estimate of reflected light 42. Because the receiver 34 has a wide
field of view and has the ability
to independently measure light at a wide range of points within this field of
view the light source 32 need
not be carefully aligned with target 36, or with receiver 34, since the effect
of a misalignment will simply
be that a different portion of data, corresponding to different pixels within
the view, will be used to
measure the reflected light 42. Accordingly, provided that the field of view
of the receiver includes target
36, one or more regions of interest within the image will include a measured
value for the reflected light
42.
If smoke or other particulate matter enters monitored area 38, it will obscure
or scatter incident light 40 or
reflected light 42. This obscuration or scattering will be detected as a drop
in the intensity for received
reflected light 42 measured in the image region determined by the
microcontroller.
.Pixels falling outside the region selected by the microcontroller, to include
the reflected light 42, can be
ignored as light received by these pixels does not correspond to the reflected
light 42.
Over time, as the building moves or other factors alter the geometry of the
system, the target 36 will still
be in the field of view of the receiver 34 however, the image of the target 36
will appear at a different point
on the image detector of the receiver 34. In order to address this motion, the
microcontroller can be

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
3
adapted to track the image of the target 36 across its light sensor over time
to enable a smoke detection
to be performed on the correct image regions over time.
In some embodiments described therein the target 36 is illuminated at two (or
more) wavelengths X and
X2 e.g. an infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) wavelength which are emitted by
corresponding light sources
(or a common source) along two substantially collinear paths.
The wavelengths are chosen such that they display different behaviour in the
presence of particles to be
detected, e.g. smoke particles. In this way the relative change in the
received light at the two (or more)
wavelengths can be used to give an indication of what has caused attenuation
of the beam.
Furthermore, the applicants earlier application depicts an embodiment capable
of monitoring multiple
targets simultaneously. According to this embodiment, illustrated in figure 3
herein, the detector 51
includes a light source 52, a receiver 54, a first target 56, and a second
target 57 acting in co-operation to
detect smoke in monitored area 58. Target 56 reflects incident light 62,
resulting in reflected light 64
returning to receiver 54. Target 57 reflects incident light 65, resulting in
reflected light 67 returning to
receiver 54. As with the previous embodiment, the receiver 54 communicates the
image data to a
microcontroller 74. Microcontroller 74 analyses the data, and determines which
portion of the data
contains information most strongly related to reflected light 64 and reflected
light 67 respectively. At the
conclusion of this decision process, the microcontroller 74 will have selected
two portions of data,
corresponding to respective individual pixels or respective groups of pixels
read from its image sensor,
that can most reliably be used to measure the intensity of reflected light 64
and reflected light 67
respectively. In this way the system 50 can, by the addition of only an
additional target or light source,
perform the function of two beam detectors.
Using such a system, present inventors have previously proposed a particle
detection system which
addresses the seemingly contradictory requirements of the need for high
sensitivity and the need for a
wide angular range of operation in a beam detection system. However, these
constraints as well as
constraints on the intensity of light sources able to be used as transmitters
mean that there may be a
need to further enhance the particle detection system in these respects.
In beam detectors the transmitted light intensity may be limited. For example,
there may be budgetary
considerations which mean that a relatively low power light emitter must be
selected in the product.
Furthermore, in some cases, a limited electrical power supply is available,
especially if the transmitter unit
is powered by a battery. Eye safety is also a factor in limiting the
transmission power of the light source
as is the potential nuisance effect of visible light from the transmitter. For
any of these reasons, a
relatively low transmitted signal power may be used in a beam detector.
Consequently, the signal to noise
ratio of the system may. be compromised.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
=
4
In order to operate satisfactorily whilst keeping the emitted power as low as
possible it is advantageous,
for sensitivity purposes, that the polar emission pattern of the transmitter
and the viewing angle of the
receiver are kept as narrow as possible. However, for installation and
alignment purposes it is
advantageous that the same angles are kept as broad as possible. Accordingly,
accommodating these
seemingly contradictory requirements of the system can present problems.
A further problem that may arise in such a system is that a reflective surface
may provide one or more
unintended light paths between the transmitter and the receiver, and so
interfere with either the
recognition of the direct light path, or cause uncontrolled and unintended
contributions to the received
signal(s), or both. This effect is exacerbated if the reflective surface is
subject to any changes, such as
movement with temperature or building wind loads; or the movement of people or
vehicles that causes its
reflected contribution US vary over time.
Since beam detector components are often mounted just below a substantially
flat ceiling, this type of
undesired reflection may be common. It has been realised by the inventors that
to cause such an issue,
the finish of the reflective surface does not need to be obviously reflective
or mirror-like, and that even a
common matt-painted surface may provide a relatively strong specular
reflection at the narrow angle of
incidence, such as would typically occur in a beam detector with a long span
mounted near a surface.
While a mirror like, or. gloss finish is the extreme case, even an apparently
rough surface may give
enough specular reflection to create these problems.
Adjacent walls, particularly glazed walls, may also create a similar issue
with the additional complication
that blinds or open-able windows may be used at various times. However, this
issue does not arise as
commonly, since it is rarely required that beams are directed in close
proximity to walls.
For this reason and others, beam detectors typically require careful alignment
at the time of installation.
Such alignment aims td ensure that in normal conditions, free from particles,
light enters the sensor so as
to capture the majority of the transmitted beam, and to in turn maximise
sensitivity to an obscuration. This
calibration may be slow and therefore costly to perform. Moreover, it may need
to be repeated as the
physical environment changes, for example because of small movements in the
structure to which a
beam detector is attached. In some cases, if the intensity of incident light
on the detector diminishes
quickly this misalignment may also cause a false alarm.
Since beam detectors are typically mounted to a wall or like flat surface it
is generally not possible to get
behind the detector in order to use a line of sight type alignment device.
Also, since detectors are usually
mounted at high elevations and in inaccessible locations, the problem of
achieving accurate alignment,
and the difficulties caused by misalignment, are exacerbated.
=

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
As discussed in relation to figure 1, some beam detectors employ a co-located
transmitter and receiver
with a remote reflector. Another arrangement, as illustrated in figure 9, uses
a light source 1102 that is
remote from the receiver 1104. The separate transmitter 1102 may be battery
powered in order to avoid
the requirement for costly wiring. Furthermore, in embodiments that are
powered from the fire alarm loop
5 the detector unit 1104 (or the combined light source and detector 102, of
figure 1,) may also employ a
battery to act as a reserve supply for periods of high power consumption that
exceed a specified limit of
capacity of a wired loop supply.
In order to achieve the 'required service life, and for conformance with
safety requirements, it is desirable
that the battery-powered units should not be powered on during shipping or in
long-term storage.
Conventionally, battery-powered equipment is often activated using a manual
switch, or by removal of an
insulating separator, or by inserting the batteries into the equipment. The
inventors have identified that
these methods have several disadvantages, particularly in the case of beam-
detection systems. The
conventional systems for powering up the battery-powered equipment are not
automatic and, in
consequence, may be overlooked when the beam-detection system is installed. In
beam-detection
systems the wavelengths used for the light source 102 are often invisible to
the human eye. This makes it
difficult to confirm that the light source 102 is active when installed. In
addition, the beam detection
systems are often installed at a significant height, requiring scaffolding or
a cherry-picker to access the
system components. As a result, it is time-consuming and costly to access and
rectify a unit that has
inadvertently been left non-operational.
Some of the conventional techniques of activating battery-powered units also
interfere with the common
requirement that beam:detection systems should avoid arrangements that cause
penetrations through the
main enclosure of the unit. It is often the case that transmitters are
designed to be resistant to the entry of
dust and moisture, and the use of manually-operated switches may makes this
isolation more difficult and
costly to achieve.
A further problem that may arise with beam detectors is that their exposed
optical surfaces may become
contaminated with dirt over time. This can gradually reduce the received
signal with the potential to be
raise a false alarm. Methods to avoid and remove dirt build up on optical
surfaces are known, and
employed particularly commonly in the field of closed circuit TV security
surveillance applications, such as
the use of contamination-resistant coatings on viewing windows, protective
shrouds, wash-wipe
mechanisms and the like.
Also, as described in PCT/AU2008/001697 in the name of Xtralis Technologies
Limited, there are other
mechanical means for cleaning or avoiding dirt build up on optical surfaces,
including methods using
= filtered clean air as a barrier, or electrostatic guard areas to prevent
window contamination. Such

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
6
methods may advantageously be used for beam detectors separately or in
combination with other
aspects of the current invention, and each constitute an aspect of the present
invention.
With the dual wavelength system described in connection with figures 2 and 3 a
variation in the absolute
intensities of received light is tolerated to an extent, because a
differential measure is used to detect
particles in the beam, but relative variation between the wavelengths may
create faults or, worse still,
false alarms; specifically a relative reduction in the received signal from
the UV beam compared to the IR
beam may be mistaken for smoke. Thus any wavelength selective build up of
contaminants on the optical
surfaces can be problematic.
It is a problem in the field of video surveillance, and similar fields which
have remotely located optical
devices (such as cameras), that insects or other foreign bodies may from time
to time land on the
exposed surfaces of the optical components of the system and partly or totally
obscure the field of view of
the optical components. Similar problems may also arise in particle detection
systems like beam
detectors which are exposed to bugs and other foreign bodies'. Accordingly,
there is a need to protect
components of particle detection systems such as a beam detector and thereby
to avoid or minimise false
alarms caused by such circumstances.
As described above, some embodiments of the present invention may include
separate light emitters in
the transmitter which are configured to emit light in different wavelength
bands. Most preferably the light
emitters are LEDs. Over time the output of the LEDs may vary in either
absolute or comparative intensity
or both. With the dual wavelength system variations in absolute intensity can
be tolerated to a certain
extent so long as the relative measure of intensity used by the system for
detecting particles remains
substantially constant. However, relative variations in the output intensities
of the two light emitters may
create faults or false alarms. This is particularly the case when the output
signal from the UV LED
reduces compared to the output of the infrared LED.
It is known to use beam detectors to monitor large areas by using beams over
say, 150 metres long or, in
relatively confined spaces requiring a beam length of eg. only 3 metres. In
conventional beam detector
systems an identical light source and receiver can be used for these two very
different applications,
i.e. 150 metre separation or for 3 metre separation. This is made possible by
either adjusting the gain on
the receiver or turning down the transmitter power according to the separation
between the transmitter
and the receiver.
However, the applicant's previous applications discussed above, and the
example of figure 3 show a
beam detector which may include more than one transmitter for each receiver.
This presents its own
particular problems, in that it is possible to have multiple transmitters set
at vastly different distances from
the receiver. For example, consider a room of the type illustrated in figure
57. This room 5700 is generally
L-shaped and has a receiver 5702 mounted at the external apex of the L-shape.
Three transmitters 5704,

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
7
5706, 5708 are positioned around the room 5700. The first transmitter 5704 is
located along one arm of
the L. A second transmitter 5706 is located in a position 90 from the first
receiver 5704 at the end of the
other arm of the L. A third transmitter 5708 is mounted across the apex of the
L-shape from the receiver
5702. As will be appreciated the distances between the transmitters 5704 5706
and the receiver 5702 are
much longer than the distance between the transmitter 5708 and the receiver
5702. As a result, the level
of light received from each transmitter will be very different. Moreover
transmitter 5708 may be so close to
the receiver that it saturates its light receiving element.
Other disadvantages may also arise, for example, from time to time, an
installer may take advantage of
the reliable performance of beam detectors and install a system outside the
manufacturer's specifications.
For example, although beam detectors are often intended to operate with a
substantial separation
between the transmitter and receiver an installer may extend this distance to
provide a system beyond
that recommended by the manufacturer or allowed by regulations. In some cases
an installer of the
particle detector may not know of the limits of operation of the receiver for
the light source provided
therewith.
In such circumstances.an installed particle detector may operate
satisfactorily at initial installation, but
sometime following installation, cease to operate correctly. This may occur,
for instance where the
particle detector or was initially installed close to, but beyond its design
limits. Over time, changes may
occur to the equipment or environment, which gradually alter the received
signal strength due to reasons
other than the presence of particles in the beam. These changes may be caused
by, for example,
component ageing, gross alignment drift, or contamination of optical surfaces.
Such system drift would
ordinarily be handled by the system if it had been set-up within its design
limits. However, when the
system is set up outside these limits, degradation of performance and the
associated occurrence of fault
conditions may occur prematurely or repeatedly.
Furthermore, it is desirable to be able to calibrate and/or test such a beam
detector by simulating the
presence of smoke using a solid object. Such a test is a requirement of
standards bodies testing for beam
detectors. For example, the European EN 54-12 standard for `Biodetection and
fire alarm systems.
Smoke detectors. Line detectors using an optical light beam'.
In prior art testing methods the testing of beam detectors employs a light
filter that partially obscures the
projected light beam to simulate the effect of smoke. The filters used usually
consist of a mesh of fibres,
or dye-loaded plates or transparencies with printed features which obstruct
all visible and near visible
wavelengths by substantially the same amount in a repeatable fashion. The
present inventors have
realised that this type of filter may not be suitable for use with a beam
detector of the type described
above.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
8
In a preferred embodiment of the system described in Figures 1 to 3, the light
sources are configured to
include a plurality of light emitters, wherein each light emitter is adapted
to generate light in a particular
wavelength band. Moreover, the separate light sources are arranged to emit
light at different times in
order that a monochromatic imaging element may be used. The direct result of
the use of separate light
emitters is that there is some separation between the two light emitters in
the light source, and thus the
light will travel over slightly different, although closely adjacent, beam
paths through the intervening space
between the light source and receiver. This provides a risk that a small
object such as an insect on the
transmitter could affect one light path more than the other and so affect the
reading of the receiver. This
may induce a false alarm or unnecessary fault condition.
Conventional beam detectors require careful alignment at the time of
installation. Such alignment aims to
ensure that in normal conditions, free from particles, light enters the sensor
so as to capture the majority
of the transmitted beam, and to in turn maximise sensitivity to an
obscuration. This calibration may be
slow and therefore costly to perform. Moreover, it may need to be repeated as
the physical environment
changes, for example because of small movements in the structure to which a
beam detector is attached.
As stated above, the inventors have previously proposed a particle detector in
PCT/AU2008/001697, filed
10 June 2009 in the name of Xtralis Technologies Ltd which includes a receiver
which has a light sensor
comprising matrix of light sensor elements, e.g. CCD (charge-coupled device)
image sensor chip, or
CMOS (complementary metal¨oxide-semiconductor) image sensors such as in a
video camera, or other
receiver that is capable of receiving and reporting light intensity at a
plurality of points across its field of
view. Each sensor .element in the receiver produces a signal that is related
to the intensity of the light that
it receives. The signals are transmitted to the controller, where a particle
detection algorithm is applied to
the received image data. Compared to a single-sensor receiver, the receiver in
this particle detector has a
wider field of view but lower noise and has the ability to independently
measure light at a wider range of
points within this field of view.
Because each sensor element has an inherent noise level, the overall signal-to-
noise ratio of the system
can be improved by focusing the target (i.e. beam image) on a single sensor
element. However, this may
not yield optimal results.
The above mentioned type of sensor e.g. CCD's and the like, are sometimes
subject to a phenomenon
created by the image processing algorithm used for the receiver, known as
staircasing, wherein adjacent
pixels or adjacent groups of pixels have significantly different values. The
physical structure of the sensor
also has non-responsive "gaps" between sensor elements that produce no signal.
Because of these
effects, any variation in the alignment of the smoke detector components can
potentially create a large
variation in the measured light intensity level.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
9
For example, because of the small size of the focused target, a very small
movement of the receiver or
the transmitter could cause the target to move onto an entirely different
sensor element with a very
different inherent noise level or response compared to the previous pixel on
which it was focused. It may
also fall into a position, where all, or a non-trivial part, of the received
beam falls into one of the
aforementioned "gaps". The resulting variation in the image intensity as
determined by the controller can
thus potentially cause the controller to falsely detect smoke.
To partly ameliorate this problem, the detector can be adapted to track the
target across the light sensors
over time to enable a smoke detection to be performed on the signals from the
correct sensors over time.
However, to properly determine the image intensity, the controller will be
required to ascertain the
inherent properties of different light sensors used over time. Doing so
requires system resources such as
processing cycles and power. Also it is not always possible for the controller
to make this determination.
In beam detectors an additional problem that may arise is interference from
ambient light within the
volume being monitored. The ambient light can either be from sunlight
illuminating the volume or artificial
lighting used to illuminate the space. Accordingly, beam detectors require
mechanisms for minimising the
impact of this light. This problem is compounded by the conflicting
requirement that the light sources of
the beam detector should be relatively low powered so that they minimise power
consumption, are eye
safe and do not create a visible nuisance. In prior art beam detectors which
use a single wavelength of
light a filter is typically used to reduce the signal from ambient light. In
the case of an infrared beam
detector this is generally a low pass filter that removes substantially all
visible and UV light. However, this
is inappropriate for a multiple wavelength system as described herein.
In the preferred embodiment of the system described above the particle
detector is powered at the
receiver directly from the fire alarm loop. This minimises the installation
costs of the device in that it
obviates the need for dedicated wiring for supplying power or communicating
with the detector. However,
the fire alarm loop usually only provides a very small amount of DC electrical
power for the detector. For
example, an average power consumption of about 50mW may be desirable for such
a detector. However
with current technology the power consumed during video capture and processing
may be far above the
50 mW that is available from the loop. To address this problem a separate
power supply could be used,
but this is costly since standards for fire safety equipment are onerous, e.g.
they require a fully approved
and supervised battery backed supply, and fixed mains wiring.
The limited supply of power also limits the optical power output of the
transmitter. The limited optical
power output in turn limits the signal to noise ratio of the measured signal.
If the signal to noise ratio of
the system degrades too far, the system may experience frequent or continual
false alarms.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
In some systems, the signal to noise ratio can be enhanced by employing long
integration or averaging
times at the receiver. However system response times, which are usually
between 10 and 60 seconds,
must be increased to higher levels if long integration times are used. This is
undesirable.
In addition to using a beam detector for smoke detection it is often desirable
to use other sensor
5 mechanisms for detecting additional or alternative environmental
conditions or hazards, for example CO2
gas detection or temperature detection. The detectors conventionally use a
wired or radio communication
link to signal an alarm' or fault condition to fire alarm control panel or
like monitoring system. As such
these links often add significant cost and potential reliability issues to the
alarm system.
In some systems the present inventors have determined that it can be
beneficial to operate at least some
10 components, and most advantageously the transmitter on a battery. An
exemplary component is
described in the applicant's co-pending patent application no.
PCT/AU2009/000727, filed on 26 June
2008.
However, a problem that can arise in a battery powered component of a particle
detector is that over time,
the batteries of the component will become discharged and the component will
ultimately fail. Such failure
will potentially require an unscheduled maintenance call out for the device to
be repaired and
recommissioned. In a smoke detection application this is particularly
problematic as the equipment is
used in a life-safety role and faults are required to be rapidly remedied. The
problem can be remedied by
performing preventative maintenance but ultimately this may amount to
performing unnecessary servicing
and replacement of units that have a significant amount of battery life
remaining and therefore is costly
and wasteful of materia1s.
Unfortunately, variations in individual battery performance and environmental
conditions make simply
scheduling routine replacement periods unreliable and potentially wasteful.
One apparent solution to the
problem is to equip the component with an indicator of battery state, however
this has a disadvantage of
adding cost, and the indicator itself is power consuming which further reduces
battery life. Moreover, it
requires regular direct inspection of the indicator on the component which, in
the case of a beam detector,
may be particularly inconvenient.
In beam detectors such as that described in relation to figure 3 i.e. where a
plurality of beam detectors
are formed by corresponding transmitter and receiver pairs, such that two or
more beams either intersect
or pass through a common region of air, sufficiently close to each other that
their points of intersection
can be mapped to addresses within the region being monitored, a problem may
arise in that any one of
the subsystems may be affected by environmental conditions or system problems
that do not affect the
other subsystem. Such issues generally force a reduction in achievable
sensitivity or increase the rate of
unwanted false alarms:

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
11
Reference to any prior art in the specification is not, and should not be
taken as, an acknowledgment or
any form of suggestion that this prior art forms part of the common general
knowledge in Australia or any
other jurisdiction or that this prior art could reasonably be expected to be
ascertained, understood and
regarded as relevant by a person skilled in the art.
Summary of the invention
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a beam detector arrangement
comprising a transmitter
adapted to transmit one or more beams of light having a predetermined
characteristic over a field of
illumination and a receiver having a field of view of the receiver and adapted
to receive a beam of light
transmitted by the transmitter;
1 0 the beam detector being installed to protect a monitored volume which
includes a structure
having one or more reflective surfaces within the field of illumination of the
transmitter and the field of
view of the receiver;
the beam detector including a processor adapted to determine whether a light
beam received at
the receiver possesses one or more predetermined light characteristics.
In the event that the one or more characteristics are possessed the processor
can be adapted to
determine that a beam of light from the transmitter is received. In the event
that a received beam does not
possess the one or more characteristics the processor can determine that a
beam of light from the
transmitter is not received. Alternatively the processor can determine that
the beam of light received is a
reflection of the transmitted beam.
The beam detector arrangement can include signalling means adapted to signal a
fault condition in the
event that the processor determines that a beam of light from the transmitter
is not received and/or a
reflected beam is received.
In a second aspect the present invention provides a method for determining
whether a beam of light
received by a receiver of a beam detector is a directly transmitted beam or a
reflected beam. The method
including receiving the beam at a receiver and measuring one or more
predetermined characteristics of
the beam, and depending on the extent to which the predetermined
characteristic is present in the beam
determining if the received beam is a directly transmitted beam or a reflected
beam. In the event that the
one or more characteristics of the received beam do not substantially match
one or more predetermined
characteristics of the transmitted beam the method can include, determining
that the received beam is a
reflection. The beam characteristics can include relative strength of two or
more wavelength components
in the received beam and/or received polarisation characteristics of the beam.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
12
In a further aspect the present invention provides a receiver for a beam
detector, the receiver including
the plurality of image sensors, each image sensor including a plurality of
sensor elements, said image
sensors being arranged to have at least partially overlapping fields of view.
The receiver can additionally
include an optical arrangement adapted to form an image on each of the two
sensors. The receiver can
additionally include image analysis means to analyse an image from more than
one of the plurality of
image sensors to determine an angular position of an image component within
the field of view of a
plurality of the sensors. The image component can be one or more beams
transmitted by a light source of
a beam detector.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a receiver for a beam
detector, the receiver including:
one or more sensors including a plurality of sensor elements to receive a beam
of light from a
transmitter;
processing means in data communication with the one or more sensors to receive
and process
image data therefrom; and
input means adapted to receive an input representative of a number of beams
which are to be
received from one or more transmitters of the beam detector.
Preferably, the input means can include one or more switches (e.g. DIP
switches), or by providing a data
input interface such as a serial port, or the like, over which data may be
provided to the processor means,
or memory associated therewith.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a beam detector including:
one or more light sources
adapted to transmit said beam of light across a region being monitored; one or
more receivers arranged
with respect to the transmitter and the volume being monitored such that light
from the transmitter arrives
at the receiver after traversing at least a part of the volume being
monitored.
In certain embodiments of the present invention the beam detector system may
include one or more light
blocking baffles arranged with respect to the volume being monitored and the
transmitter and/or receiver
such that no reflections from a surface within a field of illumination a light
source and a field of view of a
light receiver of the beam detector arrive at the receiver.
In preferred embodiments of the beam detector the light receiver is made in
accordance with one of the
aspects of the invention described herein.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
13
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the transmitter of the beam
detector is made in
accordance with an embodiment of any one of the aspects of the present
invention.
In one aspect the present invention provides a transmitter for a beam detector
transmitter including one or
more light sources. adapted to generate light in a spatially distinct beam
pattern. Preferably, the spatially
distinguishable beam pattern is not symmetrical in at least one plane. The
spatially distinguishable beam
pattern can include a pattern of individual light beams having distinguishable
characteristics. The
characteristics may be wavelength characteristics, polarisation
characteristics or modulation
characteristics which are distinguishable from each other. Other
characteristics may also be used. For
example, in a preferred form, this distinguishable pattern can include a pair
of distinguishable light beams.
A single light source can be used in some embodiments of the transmitter. In
this case, the image of the
beam which is formed by a receiver must be such that a shape of the light
source is directionally
distinguishable. For example, the image of the light source can be 'L' shaped
such that up and down and
left and right can be distinguished from an image of the light source.
In a beam detector including a transmitter of the above type, the present
invention, in a further aspect,
also provides a method of determining whether a beam received at a receiver is
transmitted by a direct or
reflected path, the method including:
arranging a light source and receiver such that the beam transmitted by the
source is received at
the receiver; and
orienting the light source with respect to an adjacent surface within the
field of illumination of the
light source and field of view of the receiver, such that a direct image of
the light source and reflected
mirror image of the light source from the surface are distinguishable at the
receiver.
This step of aligning can include aligning the light source such that its
image is not symmetrical in the
direct and reflected images.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a method of distinguishing
a directly received beam
from a reflected beam in a beam detector system, the method including
receiving an image containing
two image segments which potentially correspond to beams transmitted by the
particle detector;
determining a brightness of each of the received beams; and
determining that a brightest one of the received beams is the directly
received beam.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
14
In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of
determining which one of a
plurality of received beams is directly received from a light source and which
is received by a reflection
from a surface, the method including:
determining which of the received beams is received at a sensor element of a
light sensor of a
receiver of the beam detector that is furthest perpendicularly from the
reflecting surface; and
designating the determined beam image as the direct beam image.
In a first aspect there is, provided a beam detector including:
=
a light source adapted to transmit a beam of light with a first polarisation
state;
a light receiver adapted to receive light in a second polarisation state and
output a received light
level; and
a controller adapted to analyse the received light level and apply alarm
and/or fault logic and if a
predetermined fault condition exists, to initiate an action.
In one embodiment the first and second polarisation states are parallel.
In another embodiment the first and second polarisation states are offset from
each other. They may be
orthogonal.
The beam detector can include a light source adapted to transmit a second beam
of light with a third
polarisation state. The first and third polarisation states are preferably
different. Most preferably they are
orthogonal. The first and second light sources can be a common light source.
The third and second
polarisation states can be the same.
The beam detector can also include a light receiver adapted to receive light
in a fourth polarisation state.
The second and fourth polarisation states are preferably different. Most
preferably they are orthogonal.
The fourth and first polarisation states can be the same.
One or both of the light receiver or transmitter can include a polarising
filter, or a plurality of
interchangeable filters.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
A component of a beam detector system including:
at least one electro-optical component configured to emit light or receive
light in a first spatial
distribution; and
an optical subsystem arranged with respect to the electro-optical component
such that the first
5 spatial distribution is adjusted to form a second spatial distribution,
wherein
the relative extent of the first spatial distribution along two non-parallel
axes are different
to the relative extent of the second spatial distribution along the same axes.
Preferably the axes are orthogonal to each other. Most preferably one is
interdict to be a vertical axis and
the other a horizontal axis.
1 0 Preferably the second spatial distribution is relatively wider
horizontally than vertically when compared to
the first spatial distribution.
The optical subsystem can include an anamorphic lens, or other 'wide-screen'
optical system.
The electro-optical component can be an image sensor. The electro-optical
component can be a light
emitter e.g. an LED, laser diode.
1 5 A further aspect of the present invention provides a light source for a
beam detector including:
at least a light emitter to generate a beam of light; and
an optical subsystem for controlling the angular dispersion of the beam of
light wherein the optical
subsystem is adapted to shape the beam of light such that it has a larger
angular dispersion along one
axis than another.
Preferably the shape of the beam is wider than it is high. The -beam can be
shaped such that it has a
horizontal angular dispersion of between 5 and 25 degrees. Most preferably it
is between about 10 and
15 degrees.
The vertical dispersion can be between 0 and 10 degrees. Most preferably it is
between about 3 and 5
degrees.
In a yet another aspect the present invention provides a receiver for a beam
detector including:

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
16
a light sensor capable of providing an output representative of a sensed light
level at a plurality of
positions on the sensor; and
an optical subsystem adapted to receive light in a field of view having a
first shape and direct it
onto the light sensor in an image of a second different shape.
Preferably the optical subsystem includes an anamorphic lens. The field of
view of the optical subsystem
is preferably wider in one direction than another. Preferably it is wider than
it is high.
The field of view of the optical subsystem can be defined by a maximum light
acceptance angle in one
direction and a maximum light acceptance angle in another direction.
Preferably the maximum horizontal acceptance angle is 90 degrees or less.
However it could be more in
some cases.
Preferably the maximum vertical acceptance angle is 10 degrees or less.
A further aspect of the invention, in broad outline relates to the set up of
particle detection apparatus
wherein a visual alignment device incorporated with or attached to the
particle detection apparatus is
directed towards a target and is used to accurately align the apparatus at the
time of installation, or when
adjustment of alignment is necessary. The visual alignment device and the
optical elements in the particle
detector will have a fixed alignment relative to each other. The visual
alignment device may comprise a
visual beam generator which projects a visually observable light beam towards
the remote surface, or it
may comprise a video camera which receives an image of the remote surface and
displays the image of
the surface on a display screen.
=
One aspect of the invention provides a component of a smoke detector
comprising:
an optical module including one or more light sources and/or one or more light
receivers;
mounting means for mounting the optical module to a support surface;
an articulated connection located between the mounting means and the optical
module; and
a visual alignment device fixed to move with the optical module for assisting
in aligning the light
source or sources and/or receiver or receivers, relative to a target.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
17
Optionally the visual alignment device comprises one or more sockets in the
optical module in which an
alignment beam generator can be inserted.
The articulated connection may include one or more locking means for locking
the orientation of the
optical module relative to the mounting means. The articulated connection may
comprise a ball and cup
joint, capable of allowing the optical module to be tilted relative to the
mounting means through a
relatively large arc of tilt, the locking means adapted to lock the ball to
the cup in a selected orientation.
The locking means may comprise a screw member which engages in a threaded bore
in the cup and
contacts the surface of the ball to lock the ball and cup together. Optionally
the screw is accessible via the
visual alignment device.
In an alternative configuration of the invention provides a component of a
smoke detector comprising:
an optical module including one or more light sources and/or one or more light
receivers;
fixed mounting 'means for mounting the optical module to a support surface;
an articulated mounting means located between the optical module and one or
more light sources
or light receivers; and
a visual alignment device fixed to move with the light source or sources
and/or receiver or
receivers, to assist in aligning the light source, sources and/or receivers
relative to a target.
Optionally the visual alignment device comprises one or more sockets in the
articulated mounting means
in which an alignment beam generator can be inserted.
The articulated connection may include one or more locking means for locking
the orientation of the
optical module relative to the articulated mounting means. The articulated
connection may comprise a ball
and cup joint, capable of allowing the optical module to be tilted relative to
the mounting means through a
relatively large arc. of tilt, the locking means adapted to lock the ball to
the cup in a selected orientation.
The locking means may comprise a screw member which engages in a threaded bore
in the cup and
contacts the surface of the ball to lock the bail and cup together. Optionally
the screw is accessible via the
visual alignment device. Alternatively a rotatable mount can be used.
The visual alignment device may comprise a laser housed in or mounted on a
cylindrical tube or shaft
sized to be a sliding fit in the beam alignment means. Optionally the laser
forms part of a tool for locking
the articulated connection. The laser may flash to assist in visual
identification.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
18
Alternatively the visual alignment device may comprise a video camera mounted
to move with the
housing, and able to generate an image of the target, the image including
sighting means which, when
aligned with the target will indicate that the optical component is
operationally aligned. The housing may
include a video camera mount which, when the camera is mounted thereto aligns
the camera with the
housing such that the camera has a field of view aligned in a direction in a
known orientation relative to
the light source. Optionally the known orientation is axially aligned with
light emitting from the light source.
The component can be, for example a transmitter, receiver or target for a
particle detector, such as a
beam detector.
Another aspect of the invention provides a method of aligning a component of a
smoke detector
1 0 comprising:
mounting the component in an initial orientation to a support surface, the
component including a
visual alignment device;
determining the orientation of the component by visually observing an output
of the visual
alignment device;
adjusting the orientation of the component by monitoring the visual alignment
device until the
component is in a selected operating orientation; and
fixing the component in said operating orientation.
The method can include removing the visual alignment device from the
component.
The orientation of the component could be determined by observing either of a
position of an alignment
light beam emitted from the visual alignment device at a location remote from
the support surface, or
observing an image of the remote surface generated by a camera of the visual
alignment device.
A further aspect of the invention provides an alignment tool comprising:
a shaft having a handle;
a driver actuatable by the handle;
a visual alignment device in a fixed or known orientation relative to the
driver; and

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
19
a shaft and a handle.
Further there is provided for the visual alignment device to comprise a laser
which is located in a casing,
and for a handle to have a recess therein shaped to receive the casing. The
laser will typically be a
battery powered laser with an on/off switch so that the laser may be switched
off when not in use. The
shaft may be straight or may have an elbow therein, depending on the
configuration of the apparatus with
which the tool is to be used. Alternatively the visual alignment device may
comprise a video camera.
An aspect of the invention provides a visual alignment tool having:
engagement means for engaging with and aligning the visual alignment tool
relative to a particle
detector component; and
visual targeting means for providing a visual indication of the alignment of
the particle detector
component when so engaged.
The visual targeting means may be a camera, but is preferably a means for
projecting visible light. The
visible light could be a simple beam as in a laser pointer, or more complex
patterns such as cross hairs.
The means for projecting may flash to assist in visual identification. The
visual targeting means is
preferably battery powered, and may include an on/off switch so that it may be
switched off when not in
use.
The engagement means is preferably an elongate projection receivable within a
recess within the particle
detector component. Preferably the visual targeting means is coaxially aligned
with the engagement
means.
The visual alignment tool preferably includes an elongate handle and a shaft,
the shaft projecting from an
end of the handle and being coaxially aligned therewith, wherein at least a
portion of the shaft forms the
engagement means. The shaft and recess may be cylindrical and sized for a
sliding fit therebetween.
The visual targeting means is preferably arranged at the other end of the
handle. Optionally the visual
targeting means may be removable from the handle.
The visual alignment tool may include a driver for engaging with and actuating
a locking means of the
particle detector component.
The driver is preferably formed at an end of the shaft distal from the handle
and rotatable about the axis
of the shaft to actuate the locking means. The driver may be, for example, an
Allen key (hex), Phillips

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
head or other propriety shape e.g. a triangle. Ideally the driver is shaped
for engagement with the locking
means in only a single relative rotational orientation, e.g. the drive may be
a non-equilateral triangular
projection receivable in a complementary recess, so that the rotational
orientation of the visual alignment
tool is indicative of the state of the locking means. Visible indicia may be
provided on the tool to aid in
5 said indication.
In this aspect the invention also provides a particle detector component;
the component including a mounting portion, an optical module, and locking
means;
the mounting portion being fixedly attachable to a mounting surface;
the optical module being articulated relative to the mounting portion for
alignment relative to a
10 target and including means for enabling a visual indication of said
alignment; and
the locking means being actuatable to lock the optical module relative to the
mounting portion in a
selected alignment.
The term 'target' as used herein is intended to be interpreted broadly, and
may include an actual target
mounted at the remote location for reflecting the source light back to a
receiver. The target may also
15 however simply refer tO a remote surface if reflected light from that
remote surface is monitored by the
receiver or even a desired point on which a component should be aligned, e.g.
the receiver could be a
target for a light source or vice versa.
The means for enabling a visual indication could be a visual targeting means,
including an electro optical
device such as a camera or laser pointer, but is preferably an engagement
feature for cooperating with a
20 visual alignment tool incorporating visual targeting means.
Preferably the optical module includes an elongate recess forming the
engagement feature. The recess
preferably has at least one open end and is arranged so that the axis of the
recess projects toward the
target when the optical module is in alignment with it. The recess may project
in a direction parallel to a
limit of a field of operation of the optical module or in some other known
physical relationship with the
spatial optical characteristics of the optical module.
The locking means is preferably actuatable by the visual alignment tool. The
locking means preferably
includes a driven member located within the recess and engageable with a
driver of the visual alignment
tool to actuate the locking mechanism. Preferably it is adapted to be
rotationally driven about the axis of
the recess to a selected orientation to actuate with locking means. The driven
member is preferably

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
21
shaped for engagement with the driver of the visual alignment tool in only a
single relative rotational
orientation, e.g. the driver may a non-equilateral triangular projection
receivable in a complementary
recess formed in the driven member, so that the rotational orientation of the
visual alignment tool is
indicative of the state of the locking means. lndicia may be provided on the
component to aid in said
indication.
Preferably one of the optical module and the mounting portion, most preferably
the optical module, is
captured within the other portion, said articulation being effected by a
spherical sliding fit between the
optical module and the mounting portion. The driven member may be a grub screw
within one of the
optical module and mounting portion, and rotatable to engage the other of the
optical module or mounting
portion. But preferably, the optical module includes a, brake shoe and a cam,
wherein the cam is arranged
to be driven by the driven member and in turn drive the brake shoe to,
frictionally or otherwise, engage
the mounting portion and thereby lock the optical module relative to the
mounting portion. The cam may
be attached to the driven member or integrally formed therewith. The braking
shoe may be biased
towards a retracted, non-braking, position.
The optical Module may include a simple optical element, such as a lens or a
mirror. For example, a
mirror alignable for redirecting a beam to or from a fixedly mounting electro-
optical element. In this case
the mirror and electro-optical element may be mounted in a housing.
Preferably the optical module includes an electro-optical element such as a
light emitting element or
elements or light receiver. The electro-optical element could be camera.
Preferably the particle detector component is configured to operatively
connect a circuit, to enable
operation of the electro:optical element, to a power supply when said locking
means is actuated. For this
purpose, a switch may be associated with the driven member. For example, the
driven member may carry
at a point at a radius from its axis a magnet which is arranged to act on a
reed switch when the driven
member is rotated to the selected orientation.
This aspect of the invention also provides a combination of the particle
detector component and the visual
alignment tool, and methods of installing, and aligning, a particle detector
component.
There is provided a method of aligning a particle detector component, the
particle detector component
includes an optical module, a mounting portion and locking means, the method
includes:
articulating the optical module relative to the mounting portion to align a
visual indication of
orientation with a target.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
22
Preferably the method includes actuating the locking means to lock the optical
module in said alignment.
Preferably the method further includes engaging with the optical module of the
particle detector
component a visual alignment tool to provide said visual indication of the
orientation of the optical module;
and,
disengaging said visual alignment tool.
Said actuation preferably includes rotating said visual indication tool, and
most preferably simultaneously
connects an electro-optical component to a power supply.
The method of installing the particle detector component includes:
fixedly mounting a mounting portion of the particle detector component to a
mounting surface;
and
aligning the particle detector component in accordance with the aforedescribed
method.
In a preferred form the step locking the optical module and connecting the
electro-optical component to a
power supply.
In another aspect the invention provides a smoke detector component:
the component including a mounting portion, an optical module, locking means
and activation
means;
the mounting portion being fixedly attachable to a mounting surface;
the optical module including a electro-optical element and being articulated
relative to the
mounting portion for alignment relative to a target;
the locking means being actuatable in response to an installer input to lock
the optical module
relative to the mounting portion in a selected alignment; and
the activation means configured to operatively connect the electro-optical
element to a power
supply in response to said installer input.

=
CA 02760026 2016-08-05
23
In a further aspect the present invention provides, a component of a particle
detector including an electro-
optical component adapted to at least transmit or receive an optical signal
over an angular region, an
optical assembly adapted to redirect an optical signal said optical assembly
an electro-optical component
being mounted relative to each other such that the electro-optical component
receives or transmits optical
signals via the optical assembly, wherein: the orientation of the optical
assembly is adjustable with
respect to the electro-optical component to enable the direction of optical
signals transmitted or received
by the component to be changed.
Preferably the component includes a housing in which the electro-optical
component and optical
assembly are mounted; and an aperture through which an optical signal may
pass.
The mounting means can be adapted to mount the optical assembly rotably with
respect to the housing.
The mounting means is preferably a friction fit with a recess in the housing.
The mounting means
preferably includes an engagement means engagable by a actuating tool to allow
rotation of the optical
assembly. The engagement means can be adapted to engage with an actuating tool
as described herein.
The optical assembly can include a mirror to reflect an optical signal.
The electro-optical component can be a light sensor including a plurality of
sensor elements. The light
sensor is preferably a camera adapted to capture a series of images.
According to an aspect of the invention there is provided a particle detector
assembly comprising a first
module having an actuator and a second module configured to be mounted to the
first module. The
second module comprises electro-optical system for use in a beam-detection
system and a power source
operable to provide electrical power to the electro-optical system. The second
unit also includes a switch
responsive to the actuator. When the second module is mounted to the first
module, the actuator causes
the switch to operatively connect the power source to the electro-optical
system.
In one arrangement the actuator is a magnet, and a reed switch is used to
detect the proximity of the
magnet when the two modules are assembled.
In broad concept, one aspect of this invention, may improve system performance
in cases where
contamination of the optical surface affects both wavelengths by substantially
the same amount. In this
aspect, very gradual reduction of the received signals are compensated by an
increase of the effective
overall receiver gain of both signal channels, using a time constant that is
chosen to be far longer than
might cause a real fire to go undetected; for example a week.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
24
Thus, in one aspect the present invention includes detecting a long time drift
in received light level in a
particle detection system; and increasing gain of a detection circuit to
compensate for the drift. In a
system with multiple illuminations, e.g. at different wavelengths a wavelength
dependent gain increase
can be made.
This concept can be extended such that where the contamination of the optical
surface affects the shorter
wavelength by more than it does the longer wavelength, as may occur when the
contamination consists
largely of very small particles such as are present as a result of smoke
pollution, the very gradual
reduction of the received signals are individually compensated by an increase
of the effective overall
receiver gain of each signal channel separately, again using a time constant
that is chosen to be far
longer than might cause a real fire to go undetected; for example a week.
In a first aspect the present invention provides a light source for use in a
particle detection system, the
light source adapted to transmit: a first light beam in a first wavelength
band; a second light beam in a
second wavelength band; and a third light beam in a third wavelength band,
wherein the first and second
wavelengths bands are substantially equal and are different to the third
wavelength band.
The first and second wavelength bands may be in the ultraviolet portion of the
EM spectrum. The third
wavelength may be in the infrared portion of the EM spectrum.
The location from which the first light beam is transmitted from the light
source may be separated from
the location from which the second light beam is transmitted from the light
source. The separation may be
approximately 50mm.
The light source may further include a first light emitter for emitting the
first and second light beams and a
second light emitter for emitting the third light beam. In this case the light
source may further include a
beam splitter for splitting light emitted from the first light emitter into
the first and second light beams.
Alternatively, the light source may include a first light emitter for emitting
the first light beam, and a
second light emitter for emitting the second light beam, and a third light
emitter for emitting the third light
beam. The first, second and/or third light emitters may be light emitting
diodes.
The light source may further include a controller, the controller configured
to generate the first, second
and third light beams in a repeated sequence. Preferably the repeated sequence
includes the alternate
operation of the first, second and/or third light emitters.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a light source for use in a
particle detection system, the
light source including: a first light emitter for emitting a first beam of
light; a second light emitter for
emitting a second 'beam of light; and an optical system including a
transmission zone from which light

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
from the first and second light emitters is transmitted from the light source,
wherein the optical system is
arranged such that obstruction of the transmission zone by a foreign body
results in a substantially
equivalent obstruction of both the first and second beams of light.
The first and second light emitters can be semiconductor dies. Preferably they
are semiconductor dies
5 housed within a single optical package.
The optical system can further include light directing optics for directing
the first and second beams of
light from the first and second light emitters to the transmission zone.
The light directing optics may be selected from a group including, but not
limited to, a convex lens, a
Fresnel lens, and a mirror. Other optical components or combinations thereof
can be used.
10 The transmission zone is preferably forms at least a part of an
externally accessible optical surface of the
optical system. For example the outside surface of a lens, mirror, window, LED
package or the like.
The optical system may further include beam shaping optics adapted to modify a
beam shape of either or
both of the first and second beams of light.
The beam shaping optics may provide light transmitted from the light source
with a beam divergence of
1 5 approximately 10 degrees.
in this case the beam shaping optics may modify the beam shape of either or
both of the beams to extend
further in one direction than another, e.g. further horizontally than
vertically.
The beam shaping optics can also modify the first and second beams so that
they have a different beam
shape to each other. The beam shaping optics may modify the first beam of
light to have a wider beam
20 shape than the second 'beam of light.
The beam shaping optics may include one or more beam intensity adjusting
elements configured to
adjust the spatial intensity of the beam. Beam intensity adjusting elements
may be selected from a group
including, but not limited to, an optical surface coating, a ground glass
diffuser, and an etched glass
diffuser.
25 The first light emitter may emit an ultraviolet light beam and the
second light emitter may emit an infrared
light beam.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
26
The light directing optics and beam shaping optics can be combined into a
single optical element, or
comprise an optical arrangement with multiple optical elements. The optical
elements can be transmissive
or reflective elements.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a particle detection system
including a light source and
a receiver, the light source as described in any one or more of the above
statements.
A light source for a particle detector, including: one or more light emitters
adapted to generate at least
one light beam having ,a first apparent size from a distant point of view; an
optical system arranged to
receive the at least one light beam and transmit the at least one light beam
and adapted to cause the
transmitted light beam to have a second apparent size larger than the first
apparent size from the distant
point of view.
The optical system preferably includes a beam diffuser. The diffuser can be a
dedicated optical
component (e.g. a piece of etched glass) or formed as a surface treatment on
an optical component that
is used for another purpose.
In another aspect, there is provided, a light source for a particle detector,
including: one or more light
emitters adapted to generate at least one light beam having components in at
least two wavelength
bands, and optionally an optical system through which the one or more beams
pass; the light emitter(s)
and or optical system being configured to cause light in one of the at least
two wavelength bands to have
a spatial intensity profile which is different to light in another of the
wavelength bands.
Preferably the beam width of light in one wavelength band is wider than the
beam width of light in another
wavelength band. Preferably light in a longer wavelength wavelength band has a
narrower beam width
than light shorter wavelength wavelength band. Preferably the longer
wavelength band includes the
infrared or red portion of the EM spectrum. The shorter wavelength band can
include light in the blue,
violet or ultraviolet portion of the EM spectrum.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a light emitter usable
in a particle beam detector, the
light emitter including: housing including a window portion through which
light is emitted; means to
generate light in a plurality of wavelength bands; and a light sensitive
element arranged within the
housing and configured to receive a portion of the light in at least one or
more of the wavelength bands
emitted by the means to generate light; one or more electrical contacts for
enabling electrical connection
between the means to generate light, the light sensitive element and an
electrical circuit.
Preferably the light emitter includes a plurality of light emitting elements
adapted to emit light in a
corresponding wavelength band.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
27
The light sensitive element can be a photo diode or other light sensitive
circuit element.
Most preferably the light emitter elements are LED dies. Preferably the window
portion of the housing can
be adapted to control the shape of a beam of light emitted.
The housing can be an LED package.
In one form the light emitter includes a plurality of light emitters for
emitting light in one or more of the
wavelength bands. The plurality of light emitters can be arranged within the
housing to achieve a
predetermined beam characteristic. In one example, the light emitters
corresponding to one wavelength
band can be arranged to surround one or more light emitters corresponding to
another wavelength band.
In a preferred form the housing can include means to minimise ambient light
arriving at the light sensitive
element. For example, the means can include one or more filters which
attenuate light outside the
wavelength bands emitted by the light emitting elements. Alternatively, it can
include one or more baffles
or walls arranged within the housing such that the light sensitive element is
substantially shielded from
receiving direct light from outside the housing.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a method of determining the
output strength of a light
emitting element of a light source in a particle detector. The method
including illuminating the light
emitting element in accordance with a modulation pattern including "on
periods" in which the light emitter
is emitting light and "off periods" in which no light is emitted by the light
emitter; detecting the output from
the light emitting element in one or more on periods and one or more off
periods; correcting the detected
light output in one or more on periods on the basis of the measured light
level in the one or more off
periods. For example, the correction may including subtracting the off period
measurement from an
adjacent on period measurement. Alternatively, the on or off periods may be
accumulated or averaged
over some predetermined number of corresponding on or off periods to determine
the light output level.
In another aspect the present invention provides a light source for a particle
detector including at least
one light emitter of a type described herein.
The light source can include a modulation circuit component adapted to control
an illumination pattern of
the light source and a feedback circuit component electrically connected to
the light sensitive element and
adapted to receive an input therefrom and output a control signal to the
modulation circuit.
The modulation circuit can be adapted to vary one or more of:
the duration of illumination;

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
28
the intensity of illumination;
the voltage applied to a light emitter; or
the current applied to a light emitter,
on the basis of a level of or variation in the received feedback signal
received.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a method in a light source
of a particle detector, the
method including: illuminating at least light emitter of the light source
according to a first modulation
pattern, the pattern including a plurality of illumination pulses; receiving a
feedback signal; adjusting the
modulation pattern in response to the feedback signal.
The method can include adjusting at least one of:
1 0 the duration of illumination;
the intensity of illumination;
the voltage applied to a light emitter;
the current applied to a light emitter.
Preferably the feedback signal is generated by a light sensitive element
arranged to monitor the light
output at least one light emitting element of the light source.
The feedback signal can be a signal adapted to compensate for a predetermined
characteristic of at least
one light emitter of the light source. The predetermined characteristic can be
a temperature response of a
light emitter.
In an embodiment of the present invention the step of adjusting the modulation
pattern in response to the
feedback signal can include adjusting the modulation pattern to encode data
relating to the output
intensity of at least one light emitter of the light source. For example, one
or more modulation pulses may
be, inserted into, or adjusted in, the modulation pattern to transmit light
emitter output data to a receiver of
the output of light.
In another aspect of the present invention there is provided a component for a
beam detector including:

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
29
a housing having at least one side defining at least one internal volume, the
at least one wall
including an optically transmissive wall portion through which light may pass
into or out of the housing;
an electro-optical system within the internal volume adapted to transmit
and/or receive light
through an optically transmissive wall portion of the housing;
a foreign body detection system adapted to detect a foreign body on or near an
outer surface of
the optically transmissive wall portion, and including a light source adapted
to illuminate the outer surface
and any foreign body on or near the outer surface;
a light receiver to receive light scattered from the foreign body in the event
one is illuminated, and
generate an output signal;
1 0 a
controller adapted to analyse the output signal and apply fault logic to
determine the presence
of a foreign body in the event that one or more criteria are met and take an
action.
The light receiver can be any one of:
a photo diode; and
part of a light sensor array used to detect particles in use.
The light source can be mounted within the internal volume. Alternatively it
can be mounted outside the
housing.
In a first aspect the present invention provides a method, in a particle
detection system comprising one or
more light sources and a receiver arranged so that light from the one or more
light sources traverses an
area to be monitored for particles and is received by the receiver, and a
controller programmed to monitor
for the occurrence of one or more predefined alarm and/or fault conditions
based on at least one received
light intensity threshold; the method including: providing at least one
initial light received intensity
threshold for use by the controller during a commissioning period; and
providing at least one first
operational received light intensity threshold for use during an operational
period following the
commissioning period.
Preferably a received light intensity threshold provided during the
commissioning period includes a
minimum received light intensity threshold, below which a fault condition may
be indicated.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
The received light intensity threshold provided during the operational period
can include a minimum
received light intensity threshold, below which either a fault condition or
alarm condition may be indicated.
The minimum received light intensity threshold in the commissioning period can
be above a minimum
received light intensity threshold during at least a portion of the
operational period.
5 The method can further include: providing at least one second operational
light intensity threshold, after
the passing of a delay period, at least one second operational light intensity
threshold being for use
during at least part of the operational period following the delay period.
The second operational intensity threshold can be based on one or more
measurements of received
intensity during the delay period.
10 This second operational light intensity threshold is preferably higher
than at least one first operational light
intensity threshold. The second operational light intensity threshold can be
lower than at least one initial
light intensity threshold.
The method further include: determining the passing of the delay period. The
step of: determining the
passing of the delay period can be performed automatically by the controller;
and/or upon the receipt of
15 an command signalling the end of the delay period.
If the received light includes a plurality of wavelength components the method
includes; determining the
occurrence of at least one predefined alarm condition based on the received
light intensity at two or more
wavelengths. The method can include, determining the occurrence of one or more
predefined alarm
conditions based on combination of the received light intensity at two or more
wavelengths.
20 The method can further include, initiating the operational period after
the commissioning period. Initiating
the operational period can be performed, automatically, e.g. based in a timer;
or upon the receipt of an
initiation command.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a controller for particle
detection system comprising one
or more light sources and a receiver arranged so that light from the one or
more light sources traverses
25 an area to be monitored for particles and is received by the receiver,
the controller being programmed to
monitor for the occurrence of one or more predefined alarm and/or fault
conditions based on at least one
received light intensity threshold; said controller being adapted to perform a
method as described herein.
The controller can initiate an action upon the occurrence of one or more
predefined alarm and/or fault
conditions. For example the action can be the generation of an alarm or error
signal.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
31
The present invention also provides a particle detection system including such
a controller. The particle
detection system can further includes, a receiver for receiving light; one or
more light sources arranged to
emit light at one or more wavelengths, so that light from the one or more
light sources traverses an area
to be monitored for particles and is received by the receiver. Preferably each
light source is a light
emitting diode. The receiver can include an array of light sensor elements,
e.g. the receiver can be a
video camera.
A further aspect of the present invention can also provide a method of
commissioning and operating a
particle detection system, comprising: arranging one or more light sources and
a receiver so that light
from the one or more light sources traverses an area to be monitored for smoke
before being received by
the receiver; and = performing the method which is an embodiment of the first
aspect of the present
invention.
In a further aspect there is provided a particle detection system for
monitoring a volume, the system
including: at least one transmitter adapted to transmit one or more light
beams; a receiver adapted to
receive said one or more light beams from at least one transmitter after
traversing the volume being
monitored; a controller adapted to determining the presence of particles in
the volume on the basis of the
output of the receiver; and means for determining a light output intensity of
a transmitter for use in particle
detection.
The means for determining a light output intensity of the transmitter are
associated with the transmitter.
The means for determining a light output intensity of the transmitter can
include one or more filters
selectively able to be selectively positioned in a path of a beam of light
emitted by the transmitter. The
transmitter can include mounting means configured to receive one or more
filter elements to enable the
intensity of the light output by the transmitter to be set to a determined
level.
The means for determining a light output intensity of the transmitter can
include electronic control means
adapted to electronically control the light output of the transmitter. The
electronic control means can
include one or more switches able to be manually controlled to select the a
light output intensity for the
transmitter.
The electronic control means may be in data communication with a receiver and
is adapted to receive
control information from the receiver relating to the received light level
form the transmitter, and is
adapted to control the light output of the transmitter in response to said
control information.
The means for determining a light output intensity of a transmitter for use in
particle detection can be
associated with the receiver.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05 .
32
The transmitter can be adapted to transmit a plurality of signals at different
intensity levels. In this case
the means for determining a light output intensity of a transmitter for use in
particle detection can include,
means associated with the receiver to determine the received light intensity
level for the at the plurality of
signals transmitted at different intensity levels and compare the received
light intensity level to one or
more criterion to determine the a light output intensity of the transmitter
for use in particle detection.
The transmitter can be adapted to transmit a repeated pattern of signals
including a plurality of signals at
different intensity levels; and the receiver can be adapted to selectively
receive the one or more signals in
the repeated pattern determined to be used in particle detection.
The transmitter may include means for generating a repeated pattern of signals
including a plurality of
signals configured to produce different received light levels at a receiver of
the detection system.
The particle detection system is most preferably a beam detector.
The repeated pattern of signals can include signals transmitted with different
intensity levels. Te repeated
pattern of signals can include signals of different durations.
In another aspect the present invention provides a transmitter for a particle
detection system, including: at
least one light source to generate a beam of light at least one wavelength; a
housing in which the light
source is mounted; one or more filters selectively mountable with respect to
the light source for selectively
attenuating the beam of light.
The transmitter can includes a power source to powering the at least one light
source.
The transmitter can includes control circuitry to control an illumination
pattern of the at least one light
source.
In yet another aspect the present invention provides a receiver for a particle
detection system: at least
one light sensor for measuring the level of light received from a transmitter
of a particle detection system;
a controller to selectively activate the light sensor to receive signals. The
controller can be adapted to
selectively activate the light sensor to predetermined receive signals
transmitted by a transmitter of a
particle detection system.
The predetermined signals transmitted by a transmitter can be predetermined on
the basis of the
measured level of light received by the sensor in an earlier time period.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
33
The test filter comprising at least one sheet like filter element, and being
configured to transmit light in a
first wavelength band transmitted by the particle detector to a different
extent than light in a second
wavelength band transmitted by the particle detector. Preferably, the test
filter transmits a light in a
shorter wavelength and emitted by the particle detector less than it transmits
light in a longer wavelength
band transmitted by the particle detector.
The test filter may include one or more sheets of filter material.
In one embodiment, a sheet or sheets of filter material may be formed of a
material such that differential
transmission at the two wavelengths is achieved. Alternatively, one or more of
the filter elements can be
treated or impregnated with colour selective transmissive material. The
material in this case can be a dye.
In a preferred form the test filter includes a plurality of filter elements
combined at such a manner to
achieve predetermined transmission characteristic. Preferably, the
transmission characteristics mimic
smoke at a predetermined concentration. The plurality of sheets can be
combined in such a manner to
provide a selectable transmission characteristic.
In one embodiment, a sheet or sheets of substantially transparent material to
which has been added
particles in a predetermined size range corresponding to particles to be
detected by the detector under
test. Most preferably, the particles are between 0.2 and 1.0 micron in
diameter.
In a further embodiment a filter element may have a surface treatment to
create a desired absorption
characteristic. In one form, a filter element can include a textured surface.
The textured surface can be
caused by, for example, mechanical abrasion, particle blasting, chemical or
laser etching.
In an alternative embodiment, third form, surface is printed with
predetermined number of dots
corresponding to the predetermined transmission.
The filter elements may reflect or absorb light which is not transmitted.
However, absorption is typically
more convenient.
In a first aspect present invention provides a receiver in a particle
detector, said receiver including at least
one receiver element adapted to receive light and output a signal indicative
of the received light intensity
at plurality of spatial positions; and an optical system including at least
one wavelength selective element
configured to receive light at a plurality of wavelengths simultaneously and
transmit light in two or more
wavelength bands to the one or more sensor elements such that an output signal
indicative of the
received light intensity in the at least two wavelength bands can be obtained.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
34
In a preferred form the receiver is configured to measure the received light
intensity at a plurality of
spatially separate positions in a plurality of wavelength bands substantially
simultaneously.
In one form of the invention, the wavelength selective element can include a
one or more filter elements
placed in a light path .before the receiver. Most preferably, the filter
element or elements includes a
mosaic dye filter. Alternatively, the wavelength selective element can include
one or more light separating
elements, e.g. prisms, diffraction gratings, or the like. In a further
alternative, the light separation element
can be combined with the light sensor element, and comprise a multi-layered
light sensitive element
wherein respective layers of the light sensitive element are configured to
measure the intensity of light in
a corresponding wavelength band.
1 0 In a particularly preferred form, the wavelength bands of interest
include an infrared band and an
ultraviolet band. In thiS example, the wavelength selective elements can be
adapted to be infrared
selective and ultraviolet selective.
In some embodiments of the present invention the wavelength selective element
may be adapted to split
the incoming beam of light into respective wavelength components and direct
each wavelength
component to a corresponding sensor or subset of elements of a sensor.
In a further aspect the .present invention provides receiver for a beam
detector including filtering means
having multiple passbands. In one form, the filtering means can include a
multiple passband interference
filter. For example, such a filter may be arranged to selectively transmit in
first passband sensor a long
wavelength and one or more harmonics of that wavelength. For example, the
filter can be designed to
transmit substantially all of the light at 800 nanometres and 400 nanometres
while blocking a large
majority of light at other wavelengths. The filtering means can include a
plurality of filters. For example,
the plurality of filters can include more than one interference filter or
plurality of dye filters or the like. Said
plurality filters can be arranged in a predetermined spatial pattern such that
light in different passbands
falls on different portion's of a sensor of the receiver.
In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a projected
beam particle detector including
a receiver of the type described above. Preferably, the particle detector
includes a polychromatic light
source. Most preferably, the light source can be adapted to emit light in a
plurality of wavelength bands
simultaneously. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the light source
includes synchronously operated
monochromatic light sources. However, it may alternatively include a
polychromatic light source. The
polychromatic light source can include xenon flash tube or krypton light
source. Alternatively, the light
emitter may be a combination of a phosphorescent material and light emitter
arranged to illuminate the
phosphorescent material. The light emitter may, for example be an LED.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a transmitter
for a beam detector including a
light source adapted to emit light in a plurality of wavelength bands
corresponding substantially to
respective passbands of filter of the receiver of the beam detector.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a beam detector comprising
at least one receiver and
5 transmitter made in accordance with the foregoing aspects of the
invention.
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a smoke detector
including:
a transmitter adapted to emit a light beam;
a receiver having a light sensor with a plurality of sensor elements, for
detecting the light beam,
each of the sensor elements being adapted to generate an electrical signal
related to the intensity of light
10 impinging upon it;
the transmitter and received being arranged such that at least a portion of a
light beam from the
transmitter is received by the receiver;
a beam diffusing optics located in a path of travel of the light beam to the
receiver, for forming a
diffused image of the light beam on the light sensor, and
15 a controller that processes electrical signals generated by a plurality
of the sensor elements to
determine the intensity of the received beam, and apply alarm and/or fault
logic to the intensity data to
determine if a predetermined condition is fulfilled, and initiate an action if
the predetermined condition is
fulfilled.
The beam diffusing optics can include a lens which focuses the light beam at a
point which is not
20 coincident with the sensor. The beam diffusing optics can optionally
include a diffuser which may be
placed between the transmitter and the light sensors. A diffuser and lens can
be used together.
The diffused image of the beam preferably covers a plurality of sensor
elements on the sensor of the
receiver. For example it can cover between 2 and 100 elements. Preferably it
covers between 4 and 20
sensor elements, although it may be more depending on the size and density of
sensor elements on the
25 sensor. The diffused image of the beam is preferably larger than a
sharply focused image of the beam
would be.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
36
=
The controller is preferably adapted to combine the received signals from a
plurality of sensor elements to
determine the received light level. In one form the measured light level from
a plurality of sensor elements
are added. Prior to adding the signal levels of each contributing sensor
element can be weighted.
The controller may determine a centre-of-signal position corresponding to an
image of a beam on the light
sensors, and weight the signal from each sensor element according to a
distance between each sensor
and the centre-of-signal position.
The transmitter may transmit a beam of light having components in two or more
wavelength bands.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for
detecting smoke, including:
transmitting a light beam from a transmitter toward a receiver having a sensor
comprising multiple
1 0 sensor elements;
arranging a receiver so that it receives the beam;
forming a diffused image of the light beam on the sensor;
generating electrical signals related to the intensity of the received light
level detected by at least
those sensor elements of the multiple sensor elements on which the beam
impinges;
determining the intensity of the received beam based on a plurality of the
signals;
applying an alarm and/or fault logic to the received determined intensity; and
initiating an action if a predetermined alarm and/or fault condition is
determined.
The step of forming a diffused image of the beam optionally comprises
defocusing the light beam such
that it is focused at a position that is not coincident with the light sensor.
Alternatively or additionally, the step of diffusing the beam may include
placing a diffuser between the
transmitter and the sensor.
The step of determining the intensity of the received beam can include
combining a plurality of the
received signals. The signals can be weighted in the combination. For example
the method can include
determining a centre of signal position of the diffused image of the beam and
weighting the signals
according to the distance of their corresponding sensor element from the
centre of signal position.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
=
37
In a first aspect the present invention provides a component for a particle
detection system including, a
first processor adapted to intermittently receive data from an image capture
device and to process said
data; a second processor communicatively coupled with the first processor and
adapted to selectively
activate the first processor.
The second processing device can be additionally configured to perform one or
more of the following
additional functions of the particle detection system, communication with an
external data communication
system connected to the particle detector; control of one or more interface
components of the system;
monitoring of a fault condition of the component, or the like.
Preferably the second processor is of lower power consumption than the first
processor.
The component preferably also includes imaging means to receive one or more
optical signals from a
transmitter associated with the particle detection system.
In a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method in a
particle detection system. The
method includes, monitoring an activation period of a first processor using a
second processor; activating
the first processor in response to a signal from the second processor; and
performing one or more data
processing steps with the first processor.
The method can include deactivating the first processor upon completion of one
or more processing
tasks.
The first processor is preferably adapted to process video data from a
receiver of the particle detection
system.
=
In one aspect the present invention provides a light source for a particle
detector, including:
at least one light emitter for emitting at least one beam of light for
illuminating a part of a region
being monitored;
a battery for supplying electrical power to the light source;
a battery monitor for measuring at least one of the voltage of the battery or
its current output;
a controller configured to, control the illumination of at least one light
emitter of the light source
and to receive at least one of, the voltage of the battery or its current
output, and to determine a valve
indicative of a remaining expected battery life. Preferably, the controller is
adapted, in the event that the
=

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
38
remaining expected battery life is less than a predetermined period of time,
to generate an indication of
the remaining expected battery life.
Preferably the light source includes an environmental monitor to monitor an
environmental factor affecting
the remaining expected battery life, e.g. temperature.
The predetermined period of time is preferably longer than a period between
scheduled, recommended or
mandated servicing intervals for the light source.
In another aspect the present invention provides environmental monitoring
system including:
a beam detector subsystem including at least one transmitter adapted to emit
one or more beams
of light across a region being monitored and at least one receiver, adapted to
receive at least one beam
of light emitted by a transmitter;
at least one additional environmental monitor adapted to sense an
environmental condition
associated with the region being monitored and to communicate an output, via
an optical communication
channel, to a receiver of the beam detector subsystem.
In a preferred form, the optical communications channel can be implemented by
modulating a beam
output by one or more transmitters of the beam detection subsystem.
Alternatively, the optical communications channel can include a light emitter
associated with the one or
more additional environmental monitors and arranged to lie within a field of
view of a receiver of the beam
detector subsystem wherein the light emitter is adapted to be modulated to
communicate a sensed
condition by an associated environmental monitor.
In a particularly preferred form the light receiver of the beam detector
subsystem can include one or more
sensors including a plurality of sensing elements adapted to measure a
received light intensity at a
plurality of spatial positions. Such a system can be used to simultaneously
monitor an optical
communications channel and a particle detection beam of one or more
transmitters of the beam detector
subsystem.
In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided the beam
detection system comprising a
plurality of beam detectors; at least one controller in data communication
with the detectors and receiving
an output from each of said beam detectors. The controller being adapted to
correlate the output of at
least a pair of beam detectors which are spatially substantially spatially
coincident for at least part of their
beam length and in the event that a predetermined correlation condition exists
determining that either

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
=
39
particle detection event or a fault condition has occurred. In one form, the
correlation includes a temporal
correlation. The correlation may include a particle detection level
correlation. In a simple form, the
correlation may simply be performed by comparing whether the particle
detection level of two or more
beam detectors are substantially equal, alternatively, a particle detection
profile for a plurality of beam
detectors may be compared to one another to determine the extent of
correlation between them.
In another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of
operating a particle detection
system including plurality of beam detectors having beams that can
substantially coincident at least one
point. The method including receiving an output from the plurality of beam
detectors, determining if a
correlation condition exists between at least two of the outputs, and if a
predetermined correlation
condition exists; determining either a particle detection event or false alarm
event has occurred according
to predetermined particle detection and/or fault logic. The alarm can include
cross correlating a time
varying particle detection profile of two detectors. It can also or
alternatively include determining a
correlation between a particle detection state i.e. an alarm level or alarm
threshold crossing of the two or
more detectors.
Throughout this specification the term "beam" will be used in reference to the
output of a light emitter
such as an LED. The beam will not necessarily be collimated or confined to a
single direction, but may be
divergent, convergent or of any suitable shape. Similarly, "light" should be
understood to broadly mean
electromagnetic radiation and is not confined to the visible portion of the
electromagnetic spectrum.
In another aspect the present invention provides a particle detection system
including; at least one light
source adapted to illuminate a volume being monitored, said illumination
including a pulse train including
a plurality of pulses, said pulse train being repeated with a first period; a
receiver having a field of view
and being adapted to receive light from at least one light source after said
light has traversed the volume
being monitored and being adapted to generate signals indicative of the
intensity of light received at
regions within the field of view of the receiver, said receiver being
configured to receive light from the at
least one light source in a series defined by an exposure time and receiving
frame rate; a processor
associated with the receiver adapted to process the signals generated by the
receiver, wherein the pulses
with the pulse train emitted within each plurality of pulses has a temporal
position that is related to the
receiving frame rate.
A pulse in the pulse train can preferably have a duration about half the
exposure time. Preferably the
period of repetition of the pulse train is substantially longer than the
period between temporally adjacent
frames. The frame rate is in any one of the following ranges: 100fps-1500fps,
900f ps-1100fps, 500fps to
1200fps. Most preferably the frame rate is about 1000fps.
=

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
The duration of a pulse is preferably between 1 ps and 100ps. Most preferably
the duration of a pulse is
about 50 s.
The exposure time will typically be between 2 and 200p.s. Preferably the
exposure time is about 100 s.
The pulse train can include at least one synchronisation pulse. Preferably it
includes 2. The pulse train
5 can include at least one pulse at a first wavelength, the pulse train can
include at least one pulse at a
second wavelength. The pulse train can include at least one data pulse.
The frame rate and temporal spacing between each of the pulses are selected
such that, in at least a first
time period, there is changing phase difference between them. the frame rate
and temporal spacing
between each of the pulses are selected the temporal spacing between each of
the pulses is such that
10 each of the pulses in a pulse train substantially fall within a
respective exposure.
In another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method in a
particle detection system
including; at least one light source adapted to illuminate a volume being
monitored, a receiver having a
field of view and being adapted to receive light from at least one light
source after said light has traversed
the volume being monitored and being adapted to generate a series of frames
indicative of the intensity of
15 light received at regions within the field of view of the receiver, and
a processor associated with the
receiver adapted to process the signals generated by the receiver, and provide
an output; said method
including: determining a number of light sources from which the receiver is
receiving light.
The method can further include: analysing a plurality of frames output by the
receiver to determine the
number of light sources.
20 The method can further include: operating the receiver at a high frame
rate during the step of determining
the number of light sources; and subsequently operating the receiver at a
second lower frame rate.
The method can further include: analysing a plurality of frames from the
receiver to identify regions having
relatively high variation in received light level between frames to identify
candidate positions within the
field of view of the receiver.
25 The method can further include: comparing the variation in received
light levels for a position between
frames to a threshold.
The method can further include: attempting to synchronise the receiver to a
predetermined transmission
pattern expected from a transmitter for a candidate position, and in the event
synchronisation is
successful determining the candidate position is receiving light from a
transmitter.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
=
41
The method can further include: attempting to synchronise the receiver to a
predetermined transmission
pattern expected from a transmitter for a candidate position, and in the event
synchronisation is
unsuccessful determining the candidate position is not receiving light from a
transmitter.
The step of attempting to synchronise the receiver to a predetermined
transmission pattern can include:
capturing a plurality of at least partial frames including the candidate
location; comparing the received
frames to an expected pattern of received light corresponding to a pulse train
emitted by a transmitter;
attempting to synchronise to the received pattern using a phase locked loop.
The step of comparing the received frames to an expected pattern of received
light corresponding to a
pulse train emitted by a transmitter; can include determining a reference
level of received light
representing a time when no pulse is received for the candidate position;
comparing a light level received
from each pulse to the reference level and if the difference exceeds a
predetermined threshold,
determining a pulse is received.
The step of comparing the received frames to an expected pattern of received
light corresponding to a
pulse train emitted by a transmitter; can includes determining whether a
series of pulses corresponding to
an expected pattern is received.
The method can further include: comparing the determined number of light
sources with a predetermined
number of light sources; and in the event that the determined number does not
match the predetermined
number either: repeating the determining step; or signalling a fault.
In order to more clearly explain each of the aspects of the present invention
and their implementation,
these aspects have each been described in relation to separate embodiments. A
person skilled in the art
will readily understand how to combine two or more of such embodiments into an
implementation of the
invention. Thus it should be understood that the invention disclosed and
defined in this specification
extends to all alternative combinations of two or more of the individual
features and aspects mentioned or
evident from the text or drawings. All of these different combinations
constitute various alternative aspects
of the invention.
Throughout this specification the term "beam" will be used in reference to the
output of a light emitter
such as an LED. The beam will not necessarily be collimated or confined to a
single direction, but may be
divergent, convergent or of any suitable shape. Similarly, "light" should be
understood to broadly mean
electromagnetic radiation and is not confined to the visible portion of the
electromagnetic spectrum.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
42
As used herein, except where the context requires otherwise, the term
'comprise' and variations of the
term, such as 'comprising', 'comprises' and 'comprised', are not intended to
exclude further additives,
components, integers or steps.
Brief description of the drawings
Illustrative embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by
way of non-limiting example
only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 illustrates a conventional beam detector;
Figure 2 illustrates a beam detector capable of implementing an embodiment of
the present invention;
Figure 3 illustrates a beam detector capable of implementing an embodiment of
the present invention;
Figure 4 illustrates a scenario in which a reflection may be caused in a beam
detector;
Figure 5 illustrates a close-up view of a receiver in a beam detector made in
accordance with an
embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 6 illustrates a beam detector set-up made in accordance with another
embodiment of the present
invention;
Figure 7 illustrates beam detector arrangement made in accordance with another
embodiment of the
present invention; .
Figure 8 illustrates another embodiment of the beam detector made in
accordance with the present
invention;
Figure 9 illustrates schematically an embodiment of the present invention in
which the polarisation state
of the transmitter and receiver are aligned;
Figure 10 illustrates schematically an embodiment of the present invention
with orthogonally arranged
polarisation states at the transmitter and receiver;
Figure 11 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention in which two
orthogonally polarised beams
are transmitted to a polarisation sensitive receiver;

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
43
Figure 12 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention with a
transmitter emitting a single polarised
beam to be received by two orthogonally polarised receivers;
Figure 13 illustrates a plan view of a volume monitored by a particle
detection system operating according
to an embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 14 illustrates a cross sectional view through a volume of figure 13
showing the receiver and one
transmitter of that system;
Figure 15 illustrates a schematic view of a receiver used in an example of the
embodiment of the present
invention;
Figure 16 shows a schematic representation of a transmitter used in an
embodiment of the present
1 0 invention;
Figure 17 shows diagrammatically a smoke detector and mounting arrangement
according to the
invention;
Figure 18 shows a cross sectional side view of the smoke detector shown in
figure 17;
Figure 19 shows a side view of another embodiment of smoke detector apparatus
according to the
invention;
Figure 20 shows a plan view of another embodiment of smoke detector apparatus
according to the
invention;
Figure 21 shows a diagrammatic illustration of a further embodiment of smoke
detector apparatus
according to the invention;
Figure 22 shows a cross sectional view through a component of a smoke detector
made in accordance
with an alternative embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 23 is a schematic diagram of a beam-detector assembly having a first
module and a second
module, the assembly being powered up when the two modules are assembled;
Figure 24 is a perspective view of a transmitter, in accordance with an
embodiment of the present
invention;

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
44
Figure 25 is a close up perspective view of the brake shoe and spindle of the
transmitter of figure 24;
Figure 26 is a perspective cutaway view of the transmitter of figure 24;
Figure 27 is a perspective view of a receiver in accordance with an embodiment
of the present invention;
Figure 28 is a close up perspective view of the brake shoe, lever arm and
spindle of the receiver of figure
27;
Figure 29 illustrates a plot of received light at two wavelengths in a beam
detector according to an
embodiment of the preent invention;
Figure 30 shows a plot of the gain and corrected output when implementing a
method according to an
embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 31 shows the received light level in two wavelength bands in an
embodiment of the present
invention; and
Figure 32 shows the corrected output level and adjusted gain levels when
implementing methods
according to an embodiment of the present invention in the conditions
described in figure 31.
Figure 33 illustrates a particle detection system incorporating a light source
in accordance with an
embodiment of the invention;
Figure 34 illustrates the light source of figure 33 when partially obstructed
by a foreign body;
Figure 35 illustrates the light source of figure 33 when obstructed by smoke;
Figure 36 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the light source depicted
in figures 33 to 35;
Figure 37 illustrates a particle detection system incorporating a light source
in accordance with an
alternative embodiment of the invention;
Figure 38 illustrates the light source of figure 37 when partially obstructed
by a foreign body;
Figure 39 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the light source depicted
in figures 37 and 38;
Figure 40 illustrates an optical subsystem usable in an embodiment of the
present invention;

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
Figures 41 and 42 illustrate light sources in accordance with further
embodiments of the invention;
Figures 43 and 44 illustrate the effect of modifying the beam width of a light
source used in a particle
detection system; and
Figures 45 and 46 illustrate an advantage of having different spatial profiles
for light in different
5 wavelength bands of emitted light used in a particle detection system;
Figure 47 illustrates a light emitter usable in a first embodiment of the
present invention;
Figure 48 illustrates further detail of light emitter usable in an embodiment
of the present invention;
Figure 49 illustrates a further embodiment of a light emitter usable in an
embodiment of the present
invention;
10 Figure 50 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a circuit usable in
an embodiment of the present
invention;
Figure 51 is a plot illustrating the operation of the circuit of figure 50;
Figure 52 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a second circuit usable in
an embodiment of the
present invention;
15 Figure 53 is a plot illustrating the operation of the circuit of figure
52.
Figure 54 illustrates a schematic representation of a light source of a beam
detector employing an
embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 55 illustrates a schematic representation of a light source of a beam
detector employing an
embodiment of the present invention;
20 Figure 56 illustrates a schematic representation of a light source of a
beam detector employing an
embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 57 illustrates a room in which a particle detection system according to
an embodiment of the
present invention is installed;
=

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
46
Figure 58 shows a flow chart of one embodiment of process that may be
implemented to install a beam
detector operating in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
.
Figure 59 shows a flow. chart of one embodiment of a process that may be
performed by a controller of a
beam detector according to an embodiment of the present invention after
installation;
Figure 60 shows a flow chart of another embodiment of a process that may be
performed by a controller
of a beam detector according to an embodiment of the present invention
following installation;
Figure 61 illustrates schematically part of a transmitter according to an
embodiment of the present
invention;
Figure 62 shows a second embodiment of the transmitter illustrated in figure
61;
Figure 63 illustrates exemplary attenuators able to be used with an embodiment
of the present invention;
Figure 64 is a timing diagram illustrating graph of transmission power and
corresponding receiver state
illustrating another embodiment of the present invention;
- Figure 65 illustrates schematically a particle detection system employing a
test filter in accordance with
an aspect of the present invention;
Figure 66 illustrates an exemplary test filter made in accordance with an
embodiment of the present
invention;
Figure 67 is a plot of the transmission spectrum of a fitter made in
accordance with an embodiment of the
present invention;
Figure 68 to figure 75 illustrates various embodiments of filters made in
accordance with an aspect of the
present invention.
Figure 76 illustrates schematically a particle detection system made in
accordance with an embodiment of
the present invention;
Figure 77 illustrates an exemplary receiver made in accordance with an
embodiment of the present
invention;
Figure 78 illustrates a further illustrative embodiment of a light receiver
according to the present invention;

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
47
Figure 79 illustrates a. further light receiver made in accordance with an
embodiment of the present
invention;
Figure 80 illustrates a fourth embodiment of the light receiver made in
accordance with an embodiment of
the present invention.
Figure 81 is a schematic representation of a beam detector that utilises an
embodiment of the present
invention;
=
Figure 82 is a schematic representation of the beam detector represented in
Figure 81, showing a
different transmitter position;
Figure 83 is a schematic diagram depicting one embodiment of a diffusing
means, of an embodiment of
the present invention where the transmitter is sufficiently far away that the
beam rays entering the lens
are essentially parallel;
Figure 84 is a schematic diagram depicting another embodiment of the diffusing
means of the present
invention;
Figure 85 illustrates a further embodiment of an aspect of the present
invention;
Figures 86 through 89 illustrate multiple wavelength filter arrangements which
are able to be used in an
embodiment of the present invention, such as that illustrated in figure 85.
Figure 90 is a schematic illustration of a fire alarm system which may be
adapted to operate in
accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 91 illustrates a schematic block diagram of a receiver component of
beam detector according to an
embodiment of the present invention; and
Figure 92 illustrates an exemplary pulse train used in an embodiment of the
present invention.
Figure 93 illustrates schematically an environmental monitoring system in
accordance with a first
embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 94 illustrates a second embodiment of an environmental monitoring
system in accordance with a
second embodiment of the present invention;
=

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
48
Figure 95 illustrates schematically a light source able to be used in an
embodiment of the present
invention;
Figure 96 illustrates a system made in accordance with a further embodiment of
the present invention.
Detailed description of the embodiments
Figure 4 illustrates a beam detector of the type described above. The beam
detector 100 includes a
transmitter 102 and a receiver 104. The beam detector 100 is set-up to detect
particles in a volume 101,
which may be a room for example. The transmitter 102 emits a diverging beam of
light over a field of
illumination defined by lines 106. The beam of light includes a direct
illumination path 108 which arrives
without reflection at the receiver 104. Within the field of illumination 106
of the transmitter 102 some rays
will arrive at the receiver 104 by a reflected path, e.g. path 110 which
reflects off the ceiling 112 defining
the volume 101. The present inventors have determined that if certain
conditions are fulfilled, the
presence of the reflected beam 110 can be ignored. For example, if the
received beam satisfies minimum
received intensity requirements; and, in the event that the beam includes
distinguishable characteristics,
e.g. wavelength components and/or polarisation states, that the received beam
possesses the
predetermined characteristics. In some cases it is relevant whether the beam
which is used for detecting
particles is the direct beam 108 or the reflected beam 110, for example, in a
multiple wavelength system,
it may be that the surface finish of the ceiling 112 is such that light in one
wavelength band will be
reflected more completely than light in a second wavelength band. In the event
that these wavelength
bands coincide with wavelength bands transmitted by the transmitter 102 that
are used for particle
detection by the receiver 104, a differential measure of received light
intensity in the two wavelength
bands will behave differently in the reflected light path 110 than in the
direct light path 108. Accordingly, in
this case, it is necessary to correctly identify the direct light path beam
108.
Figure 5 illustrates one mechanism for determining a direct beam from a
reflected beam in such a
system. In figure 5 corresponding features will be numbered with the same
reference numerals as figure
4. Figure 5 illustrates a close-up view of the receiver 104 of the beam
detector 100 showing a reflected
beam 110 and a direct beam 108. Figure 5 also shows the detail of the sensor
200 of receiver 104. In this
embodiment, the likelihood of distinguishing the direct beam 108 from the
reflected beam 110 is improved
by providing the light receiver 104 with a sensor having a high spatial
resolution. As described above, the
sensor 200 of the receiver 104 includes a multiplicity of sensing elements 202
which can independently
detect received light intensity at distinct spatial positions. In figure 5, by
providing a high resolution sensor
200 it can be seen that a group of pixel 208 are illuminated by a direct beam
108 and a separate and
distinct group of sensor elements 210 are illuminated by the received
reflected beam 110. If the sensor
element size was substantially larger it would not be possible to resolve
these two received beams into
distinct groups of sensor elements. In a particularly preferred form, the
spatial resolution of the light
sensor is particularly high in the direction of a plane defined by the direct
beam and the reflected beam.

=
CA 02760026 2016-08-05
49
In most embodiments the controller of the beam detector can be configured to
determine which of the
spots, e.g. 210 or 208 has the highest intensity, and to use the highest
intensity beam for particle
detection. Typically, the brightest received beam will correspond to the
direct ray 108. In an extreme
case, there may be no sufficient discernable difference between intensity of
the two received light beams.
In this case, the beam which arrives at the receiver furthest from the
reflecting surface is preferably
selected as the direct beam as the other beam i.e. a beam nearer the
reflective surface, is more likely to
be the reflected ray.
In one exemplary embodiment, the resolution of the image sensor is 640x480
pixels.
Figure 6 shows a further beam detector installation made in accordance with an
embodiment of the
present invention. In this case, beam detector 300 includes a transmitter 302
and a receiver 304. The
operation of the beam detector is substantially identical to those described
elsewhere herein. However,
the beam detector installation additionally includes two baffles 306 and 308
attached to the reflecting
surface 310. The baffles 306 and 308 extend outwardly from the reflecting
surface 310 towards the direct
beam path 312 and serve to intercept reflected beam paths which could
potentially reach the receiver
304. The number and length of the baffles can be chosen to suit the particular
installation and may be
positioned to extend almost entirely down to the direct beam 312.
Alternatively, if accurate positioning is
possible, a relatively short baffle can be used if an accurate position of the
reflected beam can be
determined. Another option involves a longer baffle having an aperture
accurately positioned so that the
direct beam 312 passes therethrough. As will be appreciated, the same effect
can be achieved by placing
the transmitter and receiver in close proximity to an existing structure which
will act like a baffle, for
example, in a warehouse type installation in which the warehouse has a number
of horizontally extending
ceiling support beams placed beneath the ceiling, the transmitter receiver may
be located slightly below
the beams such that the beams in effect operate as baffles to prevent
interference from reflections off the
ceiling's surface.
Figure 7 illustrates a further embodiment of the present invention. This
embodiment shows a beam
detector set-up 350 comprising a transmitter 354 and a receiver 356. The
transmitter 354 emits a beam or
beams of light over a predetermined illumination field and as discussed with
the previous embodiments,
both direct beams 358 and reflected beams 360 may arrive at the receiver 356.
In this embodiment, the
receiver is configured such that it has a field of view 0 that is relatively
narrow in the direction of the
reflection and as such the receiver 356 is unable to 'see' the reflecting
surface 352. If the receiver 356
cannot see the reflective surface 352, the only light path to the receiver
from the transmitter 354 which will
produce a sufficiently strong signal to be discernable will be the direct beam
358. Similarly, the field of
illumination of the transmitter 354 can be confined such that it does not
illuminate the reflective surface
352. Typically in beam detector installations the reflective surface will be a
ceiling of a room being
monitored. In this case, the field of view of the receiver 356 and/or the
field of illumination of the
transmitter 354 will need to be constrained in the vertical direction.
Suitable fields of view for field of

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
illumination will have an angle of divergence of between 00 and 50. However,
this requirement will differ
depending on the geometry of the system. Clearly a system with a long
distance, say a 100 metres
between the transmitter and the receiver will require a very narrow angle of
beam divergence or viewing
angle to achieve this outcome. However, in an embodiment with only 3 metres
between the transmitter
5 and the receiver a much wider angle of illumination and field of view is
acceptable. Proximity to the
reflective surface will also influence the required angles to achieve the
aforementioned results.
Figure 8 shows a further embodiment of a beam detector made in accordance with
an aspect of the
present invention. In this embodiment, the beam detector 500 includes a
transmitter 502 and a receiver
504. The transmitter 502 includes two light emitters 502A and 502B. Each light
emitter 502A, 502B emits
10 a beam or beams of light over its respective field of illumination and
may direct a direct beam 508 and a
reflected beam 510 which arrive at the receiver 504. The two light emitters
502A and 502B are configured
to be actuated in predetermined illumination sequence such that the source of
a received beam, i.e.
which emitter it came from, can be determined by analysing the light received
at the receiver 504. In this
embodiment, the light which arrives at the receiver 504 via the direct light
path 508 will form an image
15 514A on the receiver sensor (not shown), whereas the light received at
the receiver by the reflected light
path 510 will form an image on the sensor of the receiver 504 such as that
shown at 514E. As will be
appreciated, the image formed on the receiver in the two cases (i.e. direct
and reflected) differ from each
other in that one is a mirror image of the other. The directly formed image
514A preserves the relative
positioning of the two light sources 502A and 502B whereas, in the reflected
image 514E, the positions of
20 these two sources 502A and 502B are flipped in the plane containing the
reflected beam and receiver.
Accordingly, by analysing the received images, it is possible to determine
which pair of received beams
corresponds to the direct beam path 508 and which pair correspond to the
reflected beam path 510. In
other embodiments of the present invention the two light sources 502A and 502B
can be light emitters
with different wavelength or polarisation characteristics, rather than being
illuminated with different
25 modulation patterns.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art any shaped arrangement of
light images on the
transmitter. For example, a two dimensional ray of distinguishable light
emitters can be incorporated into
a transmitter to allow determination of the direct or reflected beams from any
reflective surface in any
orientation with respect to the beam.
30 Turning now to figure 9, a beam detection system 1100 is illustrated.
The beam detection system can be
of any of the types described above and includes a transmitter 1102 and a
receiver 1104. The transmitter
can emit any number of beams of light 1106 in any one or more transmission
bands. The beam or beams
emitted by the transmitter 1102 are received by the receiver 1104. In this
embodiment, the transmitter is
arranged to transmit polarised light (e.g. vertically polarised light). The
receiver 1104 is adapted to receive
35 only light having the same polarisation as that transmitted.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
51
Polarisation of the transmitter can be achieved in a wide variety of ways
including by using an inherently
polarised light source such as a laser diode or by placing a polarising filter
in the beam path of a randomly
(or otherwise) polarised light source. Similarly, the polarisation sensitivity
of the receiver can be
determined by the inherent characteristics of the receiver or by the placement
of one or more polarising
filters before the sensor elements of the receiver.
In this example, nuisance light such as ambient sunlight which is generally
not polarised or is randomly
polarised will be substantially rejected by the receiver, whereas all of the
transmitted beam (less that
proportion extinguished by particles and objects between the transmitter and
receiver) will be received by
the receiver 1104.
Figure 10 illustrates a similar system to the figure 9. The system 1200 in
figure 10 includes a transmitter
1202 which emits a light beam 1206 that is received by the receiver 1204. In
this example, the transmitter
is polarised in a first direction (e.g. vertically polarised) and emits at
least one polarised beam 1206. The
receiver 1204 is arranged to receive light in a polarisation orthogonal to
beam transmitted by the
transmitter 1202. In this case, the receiver 1204 is adapted to receive
horizontally polarised light. Such a
polarisation offset presents a benefit in that large particles, like dust, in
the path of the beam 1206 may be
distinguished from small particles, like smoke. This is because large
particles like dust tend to forward
scatter light with random polarisation and thus increase the cross-polarised
component of light received at
the receiver 1204.
Combinations of the two embodiments described in figures 9 and 10 can be
incorporated into a particle
detection system. Turning firstly to figure lithe system 1300 includes a
transmitter 1302 and a receiver
1304. The transmitter 1302 is adapted to emit light beams 1306A and 1306B. A
first of these two light
beams 1306A is arranged to be emitted with a first polarisation state whereas
the second beam 1306B is
emitted with an orthogonal polarisation state. The receiver 1304 is arranged
to receive light in a single
polarisation only e.g. in the first polarisation state. Accordingly, as will
be appreciated both techniques
described in relation to figures 9 and 10 may be applied in the same receiver.
Preferably, the transmitter
1302 is arranged to generate beams 1306A and 1306B alternately so that the two
polarisation state
beams arrive at different times at the receiver 1304.
An alternate system is illustrated in figure 12. In this system the beam
detector 1400 comprising a
transmitter 1402 and a receiver 1404. The transmitter 1402 is configured to
emit a vertically polarised
beam 1406. The receiver 1404 is adapted to be able to resolve light received
in plurality of polarisation
states e.g. in vertical polarisation state or a horizontal polarisation state.
This can be achieved by having
a plurality of adjacent light receiving elements having different
polarisations which are operated either
concurrently or alternately. In this example, a beam splitting component 1408
is provided prior to the
receiver elements to direct beams to each of the receivers.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
59
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art references the
specification to vertical and horizontal
polarisation have been selected for convenience only and any polarisations may
be used. Moreover, for
convenience of description orthogonal polarisation states have been selected
to illustrate the present
invention. However, the present invention should not be taken as being limited
to polarisation states
which are either aligned or orthogonal to one another. Other angular offsets
between polarisations are
possible. Those skilled in the art will be able to determine the appropriate
calculations to perform to
account for this variation.
=
One way of achieving variation in polarisation states for a receiver or
transmitter is to provide mechanical
means for placing polarising filters in the light path. For example, a
solenoid can be used as an actuator
to move a reciprocating polarising filter into and out of the beam path.
Alternatively a rotating filter
mechanism can be employed which has plurality of differently polarised filters
around a wheel like
structure. By rotating the wheel like structure through the light path
different polarisations can be achieved
over time. Other mechanical arrangements are also possible, for example, the
light emitting element of
the transmitter 402 could be physically rotated about an axis as could the one
or more sensors of the
receiver. Other mechanical arrangements will be apparent to those skilled in
the art.
Figure 13 illustrates a plan view of a room 400A in which is installed a beam
detector system 402A
according to an embodiment of the present invention. The beam detection system
includes a single
receiver 404A configured to monitor eight transmitters 406A, 406B through
406H. Each of the transmitters
406A to 406H is adapted to transmit light with a horizontal angle of
illumination of a degrees. It is also
adapted to transmit light with a vertical angle of illumination of p degrees
as show in figure 14. Similarly
the field of view of the receiver 404A differs in its horizontal and vertical
extent. In this example, the
receiver 404A is adapted to receive light over a viewing angle of Y degrees
and vertical viewing angle of
6 degrees. In a preferred form of the present invention the horizontal angle
of illumination of the
transmitters 406A to 406H is wider than their vertical angle of illumination
p. Similarly, the receiver 1404
has a wider horizontal field of view than it does vertical field of view.
The differential fields of view and fields of illumination of the receiver and
transmitter respectively are
chosen to account for alignment tolerances in the typical installation. For
example, in most installations
such as that illustrated in figure 13 the transmitters 406A through 406H will
typically be installed at the
same height as each other and the receiver 404A will be mounted in a plane
parallel to the transmitters
406A to 406H. Accordingly, when the image of the transmitters 406A through
406H is received on the
light sensor of the receiver 404A they will tend to align on the light sensor.
Accordingly, a relatively narrow
field of view can be tolerated in the vertical direction for the receiver
404A. However, as will be apparent
from figure 4 a very wide horizontal field of view is required by the receiver
404A. Similarly, horizontal
alignment of the transmitters 406A to 406H is more difficult to achieve than
vertical alignment in most
installations. This is typically because the range of movement in the vertical
plane is more limited and

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
=
53
typically walls of a building are relatively parallel in alignment. For this
reason an installer may get away
with mounting the transmitter and receiver such that their field of view is
orthogonal to the plane of the
surface on which they are mounted and this will achieve a suitably accurate
vertical alignment. However,
this may not be the case with horizontal alignment as the angle of
illumination of the light sources and
angle of reception of the light receiver will vary from the orientation of the
surface on which they are
mounted due to the geometry of the system being installed. Thus providing an
ability for horizontal
alignment is necessary and the horizontal field of view of the receiver and
horizontal beam width of the
transmitters is advantageously relatively wide.
For example, a receiver may be adapted such that its horizontal field of view
approaches 90 degrees
while its vertical field of view is only around 10 degrees. Similarly, a
transmitter may be configured such
that its horizontal beam width is around 10 degrees whereas its vertical beam
width may be between 3
and 5 degrees.
In order to achieve different horizontal and vertical beam divergences or
viewing angles either a
transmitter or receiver may be fitted with an optical system including an
anamorphic lens.
Figure 15 illustrates an exemplary configuration of a receiver such as that
described in connection with
figure 13.
The receiver 420 includes a multi segment light sensor 422 which is coupled to
a video readout and
processing subsystem 424. The light receiver 420 includes an optical
arrangement 426 comprising e.g. a
plurality of lenses or other optical components e.g. mirrors, for focusing
received light on the sensor array
422. In a preferred form, the anamorphic lens is arranged to provide a
substantially different horizontal
and vertical field of view for the receiver.
Figure 16 illustrates a transmitter 700 which includes at least one light
emitter 702 adapted to emit one or
more beams of light in one or more wavelength bands. The transmitter 700
includes control circuitry 704
which is powered by a power source 706 which may, for example be a battery.
The light emitter 702 emits
a beam of light 708. This beam of light is shaped into a particular dispersion
pattern or beam shape by an
optical arrangement 710. As described above, the optical arrangement 710 can
include one or more
anamorphic lenses.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art different installations
will have different geometrical
limitations placed on them and requirements. Accordingly, the present
invention should not be considered
as being limited to the case where the beam shape of a transmitter e.g. 406 or
a receiver e.g. 404 is
defined by its vertical or horizontal angles. Rather, the present invention
extends to systems in which
either or both of the beam width of a transmitter or angular extent of a
receiver is different in any two

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
54
directions whether they are orthogonal with each other or not and whether they
are aligned vertically and
horizontally or not.
Irrespective of whether the particle detection system is of the type depicted
in figure 1, figure 2 or figure 3
of the drawings, or of a different type, such as that disclosed in
PCT/AU2004/000637,
PCT/AU2005/001723 or PCT/AU2008/001697 the alignment of the components of the
system, eg a light
source with the target and the reflection of an emitted beam back to the
receiver is important. As
mentioned above, there can be a significant distance between the source and
the target, thus aligning the
light source accurately with the target can be difficult. For this reason it
is preferable that an adjustable
mounting arrangement is provided which allows the direction of the light
source (and/or target ¨ if it is not
retro-reflective) to be varied, both at the time of installation, and in the
event that movement of the light
source and/or the target from its installation position occurs.
Figure 17 depicts one embodiment of an alignment beam arrangement which will
assist in the alignment
of the optical components of a particle detector. The device depicted in
figure 17 is of a type discussed
above with respect to figure 2, but the smoke detector can take various
different forms. As shown, the
smoke detector 2200 includes the light source 2202 and a receiver 2204. In
addition, the smoke detector
2200 includes a visual alignment device 2230 of the type adapted to generate
an alignment beam which
is axially aligned with the light source 2202 but which is visually
observable. The beam will project onto
the target located some distance away from the smoke detector 2200.
The smoke detector 2200 is provided with a mounting means in the form of a
circular plate 2232 which in
use will be mounted by screws or the like to a support surface in order to fix
the smoke detector 2200 at a
appropriate elevation to that support surface. An articulated connection 2234
is provided between the
mounting plate 2232 and the smoke detector 2200. The articulated connection
can take various forms,
which will allow the alignment of the detector to be varied, but being
lockable in the selected orientation. A
friction lock arrangement is possible, or some form of screw tightening
arrangement might be used.
As shown in figure 18, the articulated connection 2234 comprises a cup and
ball 2238, the ball being able
to rotate within the cup. The ball is captively held by the cup so as to allow
the smoke detector 2200 to be
tilted relative to the support plate 2232, thereby allowing the incident light
2210 to be directed precisely to
the target some distance away. A grubscrew 2240 is provided for locking the
ball relative to the cup.
Other forms of locking the ball in the cup are possible, including, for
example a friction fit.
As mentioned, the alignment beam 2242 is used to facilitate the alignment of
the incident light 2210 with
the target. Thus, the alignment beam 2242, which would typically comprise a
laser beam, is parallel to the
incident light 2210. An operator would thus be able to point the alignment
beam 2242 at the target or just
adjacent to the target to thereby ensure that the incident light 2210 (which
is typically not visible) is aimed

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
centrally at the target. Once the incident light 2210 is aimed at the centre
of the target, the grubscrew
2240 will be tightened, thereby locking the ball 2238 within the cup. This
will ensure that the smoke
detector 2200 is optimally aligned and calibration of the system can then take
place in the manner
described herein.
5 Figure 19 of the drawings depicts a manner of securing the smoke detector
2200 in a selected operable
position. In this embodiment, the grubscrew 2240 used for locking the ball
2238 within the cup 2236 is
accessible along a passage 2244 extending through to the front side 2246 of
the detector housing 2200.
The passage 2244 is configured to receive the shaft 2248 of an alignment tool
2250. The alignment tool
2250 has a driver 2252 on one end thereof and a handle 2254 on the other end
thereof. The handle 2254
10 has a recess 2256 in the rear end thereof into which a laser 2258 has
been inserted. The shaft 2248 is a
close sliding fit with the passage 2244 such as when the shaft is located in
the passage 2244 the laser
beam 2242 from the laser 2258 is axially aligned with the light source 2202
and/or receiver 2204, as
discussed above.
In this embodiment the shaft 2248 and the passage 2244 each have a
complementary cylindrical shape.
15 Of course the person skilled in the art will appreciate that other
arrangements are possible, for example
passage 2244 may have a square profile, the side dimension of the square
corresponding to the diameter
of the shaft 2248.
The installer, using the tool 2250 depicted in figure 19, will thus insert the
shaft 2248 into the passage
2244 and then manipulate the housing 2200 whilst observing the visible
alignment beam 2242 at a
20 remote target. When the housing is correctly aligned, the handle 2254
will be rotated with driver head
2252 engaged with the grubscrew 2240 to thereby tighten the grubscrew 2240 and
lock the cup and ball
together. Once locked together in this way, the technician installing the
equipment will check that the
laser beam 2242 which is still correctly aligned with the target, and if so,
will know that the smoke detector
is correctly orientated. Clearly, at any time in the future, such as whenever
the equipment is to be
25 maintained or serviced,, the orientation of the unit can be checked by
simply inserting the shaft of the tool
2250 into the passage 2244 and checking, once again, whether the laser beam
2242 is correctly aligned
with the target on the remote location.
In this embodiment, the driver 2252 is shown as a screw driver head, but
clearly if the grubscrew has
some other form of engagement formation, such as an Allen key socket, then the
driver 2252 will be in
30 the appropriately sized six sided Allen key configuration.
Whilst figure 19 depicts a tool having a laser installed therein for alignment
purposes, it will, of course, be
possible simply to insert a laser 2258 into the passage 2244 to assist with
alignment of the housing
relative to the remote target.

=
CA 02760026 2016-08-05
56
Figures 17 to 19 depict an arrangement in which the beam is aligned parallel
to the incident light beam
but this is not the'only possible arrangement. For example, the housing may
have a plurality of laser
receiving sockets therein angled to the incident beam in a configuration which
assists in the set up and
orientation of the smoke detector relative to a remote target or area of
interest. For example, where the
smoke detector is of the form discussed above with reference to figure 3, then
it may be desirable to have
a laser beam which also indicates the full arc of the light source
illumination. Clearly it would be possible
to include a socket in the housing 2200 at an angle to the incident beam which
will correspond to the full
arc of the light source illumination.
Figure 20 depicts diagrammatically a housing having three sockets 2249, each
of which is adapted to
receive a tool 2250 shown in figure 19 so as to enable the installation
technician to correctly align the
housing for optimal performance. The lateral two sockets 2249 are preferably
aligned relative to the arc of
visible light which the video camera is able to detect, and the central socket
will be used to align the
centre of the video camera with the target 2206 at the remote location.
Figure 21 depicts a further embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment
the visual alignment device
2260 includes a shaft 2262 which in turn is mounted in a socket of the smoke
detector housing 2264 and
will be aligned in fixed orientation to the optical components mounted in the
housing 2264. A video
camera 2266 is mounted in a handle portion 2268 at the end of the shaft 2262.
The video camera will
preferably be battery powered, and is adapted to generate an image of a target
at a location remote from
the housing 2264. The video camera is preferably provided with a telescopic
lens.
The image viewed by the video camera is preferably transmitted wirelessly to a
receiver unit 2270 which
includes a screen 2272 on which the image of the remote target is displayed.
The image may also include
a sighting symbol or device 2274 which may be in the form of cross-hairs, or
some other form of
alignment assisting sighting device, such as a grid pattern or the like.
Clearly, when the housing is moved the field of view of the video camera and
hence image generated via
the video camera will move on the screen, and the technician doing the
alignment of the smoke detector
will be able to correctly orientate the housing by viewing the image on the
screen. Since the video camera
is aligned in a fixed relative alignment to the optical components of the
smoke detector, once the image
on the screen is correctly aligned with the intended target, the technician
will know that the optical
components are correctly aligned. The receiver unit is preferably a hand held,
battery powered computer
device such as a FDA or the like, showing real time images from the camera.
The connection between
the camera and the receiver will preferably be wireless, but could also be via
cable.
The camera may be fitted with a wavelength dependent light filter, at a
wavelength that corresponds to a
light source, such as a LED, or other active or passive light source, mounted
at the target position. The

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
57
target light source may flash, optionally at a specific rate or pattern, so as
to be readily discernable to the
human eye. The pattern of flash may also be identified by software in the
camera and/or the receiver.
The software in the receiver unit and or the camera may include means for
generating an enhanced view
of the target on the display, and may include surrounding images of the room
or surface on which the
target is mounted. The receiver unit and camera combination preferably
includes means for generating
audible sound cues and/or voice instructions to the operator to assist in the
alignment process. These
instructions may be in the nature of instructions on how to move the housing
so as to correctly align with
the target, and could include audible words such as 'up', 'down', 'left',
'right', 'on target', and the like.
It will be appreciated that, with the video camera mounted at the end of the
shaft 2262, a small movement
of the housing about articulated connection2275 will move the video camera at
the end of the shaft
through a relatively wide arc. The shaft thus acts as a lever arm, with the
video camera mounted on the
distal end of the arm. This increases the sensitivity of the alignment
process, so that, provided the video
camera and optical components are in the correct relative alignment, when the
video camera is correctly
aligned with the target the optical components will be precisely aligned in
the intended orientation.
Figure 22 shows an alternative housing configuration for optical components
made in accordance with an
embodiment of the present invention.
In this example the component includes an electro-optical component, such as a
camera or light
source(s) and its associated electronic circuitry and optics 2904. The electro-
optical component 2902 is
mounted in a fixed relationship with respect to the housing 2906 and is
connected via fixed wiring 2908 to
electrical and data connections 2910.
The housing 2906 includes an aperture 2912 through which a beam of light may
enter or exit the housing.
The aperture 2912 may be open or can be closed by a lens or window. The
component also includes an
optical assembly 2914 mounted to the housing 2906. The optical assembly, in
this case, is a mirror
mounted at an angle with respect to the optical axis of the electro-optical
system 2902, 2904. The mirror
is used to redirect an optical signal either to or from the electro-optical
system 2902, 2904 and through
the aperture 2912.
The mirror 2914 is mounted to the housing 2906 via an articulated mounting
means 2916. The articulated
mounting means in this case comprises a rotatable shaft mounted in a rotation
friction bearing 2918
which is captured in a corresponding shaped recess 2920 in the housing 2906.
The articulated mounting
means 2916 includes an engagement means 2922 which can be engaged from the
outside of the housing
2906 using an alignment tool. For example, an alignment tool described in
relation to the previous
embodiments can be used.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
58
In use, a technician installing the optical component uses the fixed mounting
means to attach the housing
in a fixed manner with respect to a mounting surface and then adjusts the
external field of view (or
illumination) of the electro-optical components 2902 by adjusting the
orientation of the mirror 2914 using
an alignment tool. The method of operation of the system is substantially the
same as that described
above except that the articulated connection enables the orientation of the
optical assembly 2914 to be
changed with respect to the electro-optical component which is mounted in a
fixed relationship with the
mounting surface, rather than enabling realignment of the entire housing with
respect to the mounting
surface.
Figure 23 illustrates a beam-detector assembly 2300 which may, for example, be
a light transmitter. The
assembly 2300 is constructed in two modules. Module 2302 is a main enclosure
housing a battery (not
illustrated) and the electro-optical system 2306 for the unit. The electro-
optical system 2306 may be
mounted on a circuit board 2308. Module 2302 also includes a switch 2310 that,
in one arrangement, is
responsive to magnetic fields. An example of such a switch is a reed switch,
which has of a pair of
contacts on ferrous metal reeds positioned in a hermetically sealed glass
envelope. The contacts are
initially separated. In the presence of a magnetic field the switch closes.
Once the magnetic field is
removed, the stiffness of the reeds causes the contacts to separate.
Other switching devices that are sensitive to magnetic fields, such as Hall-
effect devices may also be
used.
Module 2304 is a mounting base, which includes an actuator capable of acting
on the switch 2310. The
actuator may, for example, be a magnet 2312.
The modules 2302 and 2304 are transported and stored separately from one
another or in a package
where the actuator is separated from the switch by sufficient distance to
prevent activation of the switch.
Typically, at installation, the module 2304 is affixed to a wall 2320 or
mounting surface and the module
2302 is then attached to module 2304. It will be appreciated that there are
many arrangements that
enable module 2302 to be easily and securely mounted to module 2304. For
example, module 2304 may
have one or more tracks and, during assembly, the module 2302 may be slid
along the tracks as far as a
stopper. A detent means may be provided to hold the two modules in position.
Such arrangements allow
the two modules to be assembled in a predetermined orientation, thus
positioning the switch 2310 relative
to the magnet 2312.
Only when the modules 2302 and 2304 are assembled is the switch 2310 closed,
permitting significant
power consumption from the battery to begin.
=

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
59
In another arrangement, module 2304 includes a plurality of magnets 2312. The
configuration of magnets
2312 may be used to represent an item of information, such as identifying data
for the module 2304. The
information may include a serial number or a loop address associated with the
location of the module
2304. By providing a pattern of magnets on the base module 2304, the data may
effectively be retained
permanently at the location where module 2304 is attached to the wall 2320.
Thus, even if the module
2302 is replaced, for example after a fault such as a depleted battery, the
identifying data is still present.
The module 2302 may. include a plurality of switches 2310 or sensors sensitive
to the presence of the
magnets 2312 in module 2304. For example, an array or predetermined pattern of
reed switches may be
provided, capable of reading the identification data coded in the pattern of
magnets in module 2304.
In a further arrangement, the pattern of magnets 2312 in module 2304 may be
provided on a removable
device, such as a card. The card with the pattern of magnets may, for example,
be inserted into the
module 2304 when the module is affixed to the wall 2320.
Figures 24 to 26 illustrate an alternative embodiment of the invention. The
transmitter unit 3000 includes
a housing 3200, forming an optical module. The transmitter further includes a
backing plate 3010, rear
casing 3020 and forward casing 3030 which together form a mounting portion
3180.
The backing plate 3010 includes screw holes through which it may be mounted to
a mounting surface
(not shown) such as a wall. The backing plate 3010 is attached to the rear
casing 3020 with a simple,
releasable, snap fit.
The rear casing 3020 and forward casing 3030 together define a partial
spherical cavity in which the
housing 3200 is received. The housing 3200 includes a rear housing 3040 and a
forward housing 3050.
Each of the rear and forward housing 3040, 3050 has a predominantly hollow
hemispherical shell like
form.
The rear housing 3040 has a lip about its outer periphery. The forward housing
3050 a complementary lip
on the interior of its outer periphery. The complementary lips are snap fitted
together to define the
spherical housing 3200. Adjacent this snap fit a small portion of the rear
housing 3040 projects into the
forward housing 3050 and defines an annular step thereabouts.
The outer surface of housing 3200 is predominantly spherical and complementary
to the spherical cavity
defined by the rear casing 3020 and the forward casing 3030. There is a close
sliding fit between the
complementary spherical surfaces so that the housing 3020 may be rotated to a
wide range of
orientations relative to the mounting portion 3180 and loosely frictionally
held in alignment during
installation.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
A forward end of the forward casing 3030 is open to expose the housing 3200.
In this embodiment the
opening in the forward casing 3030 is shaped, and curved, to allow the housing
3200 to be articulated to
a wider range of angles about a vertical axis than about a horizontal axis:
typically such transmitters are
wall mounted close to the ceiling, as are the corresponding receivers, it
follows that generally less
5 adjustment is required about a horizontal axis, i.e. in the up and down
direction.
A forward end of the forward housing 3050 is truncated to define a circular
opening in which a lens 3060
is carried. A circular printed circuit board (PCB) 3070 is centrally mounted
within and spans the housing
3200. The PCB 3070 is parallel to the lens 3060 and seats against the annular
step defined by the rear
housing 3040 projecting into the forward housing 3050.
10 A light source in the form of LED 3080 is centrally mounted on a forward
surface of the PCB 3070 and in
use projects a beam of light e.g. in one or more wavelength bands, the
obscuration of which provides an
indication of the presence of particles. The lens 3060 is arranged to
collimate the beam projected by the
LED 3080. A battery 3090 is carried on a rear face of the PCB 3070.
The illustrated embodiment includes a locking mechanism 3190 including a
spindle 3240, a cam 3100
15 and a brake shoe 3110 illustrated in figure 25. The spindle 3240 has at
its axial mid point an outwardly
projecting collar 3140.
Each of the rear housing 3040 and the forward housing 3050 include a tubular
recess for receiving a
respective portion of the spindle 3240. The collar 3140 is captured between
the rear housing 3040 and
the forward housing 3050 when the rear and forward housings are snap fitted
together. 0-ring seals
20 around the spindle fore and aft of the collar 3140 limit the ingress of
debris into the housing 3200 via the
tubular recesses.
A hexagonal socket 3160 is formed in a forward end face of the spindle 3240. A
cylindrical tubular
passageway 3244 passes through the forward housing 3050 and provides access to
the socket 3160.
The socket 3160 during installation of the transmitter unit receives an Allen
key like fitting from the front of
25 the transmitter unit 3000 via the passage 3244 so that an installer may
rotate the spindle 3240 about its
axis. As will be described, said rotation locks the housing 3200 in a selected
orientation relative to the
mounting portion 3180.
The rear housing 3040. has a rearward aperture in which is carried a brake
shoe 3110. The brake shoe
3110 has an outer surface 3130 which is part spherical and aligned with the
spherical outer surface of the
30 rear housing 3040 when in a retracted 'articulating position'. The brake
shoe 3110 carries a stud 3120 on
each of its sides. The studs 3120 project a short sideways distance, i.e. in
directions perpendicular to the
up and down and fore and aft directions. The studs 3120 are received within
complementary recesses

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
61
(not shown) in the rear housing 3040 and thereby define a pivot about which
the brake shoe 3110 may
rotate through a range of motion. The range of motion is limited by contact
between the braking surface
3130 and the internal spherical surface defined by rear and/or forward casings
3020, 3030, and by
contact with a cam 3100 described below.
As illustrated in figure 25 the brake shoe 3110 includes a central
longitudinal channel separating two wing
portions which each carry a respective stud 3120. The brake shoe 3110 has a
degree of compliance so
that the brake shoe 3110 and the rear casing 3040 may be assembled by
compressing the wing portions,
to reduce the overall dimension across the studs 3120, and fitting the brake
shoe 3110 to the rear casing
3040 so that the studs 3120 are received into the complementary recesses (not
shown) formed in the rear
casing 3040. Once released the wing portions return to their uncompressed
shape so that the studs 3120
snap into the complementary recesses.
The cam 3100 is carried by the spindle 3240. Of course another option would be
for the cam to be
integrally formed with the spindle as illustrated in figure 28. The cam 3100
includes a single lobe and is
arranged to act downwardly on the brake shoe 3110 at a location forwardly
spaced from the studs 3120
(and a pivot axis defined thereby).
During installation of the transmitter 3000, after aligning the housing 3200,
an installer accesses socket
3160 of spindle 3240 via the passage 3244 with an Allen key like tool. Using
the Allen key like tool to
rotate the spindle 3240 rotates the cam 3100, which in turn drives the forward
portions of the brake shoe
3110 downwardly so that the braking surface 3130 frictionally engages the
internal spherical surface
defined by rear and forward casings 3020 and 3030. The alignment of the
housing 3200 relative to the
mounting portion 3180 is thereby locked.
In this embodiment the lens 3060 and LED 3080 are configured to project light
in a direction
perpendicular to the plane of the lens 3060. The passageway 3244 is also
perpendicular to the plane of
the lens 3060. During installation an alignment tool, similar to those
described above, may be used,
wherein the alignment tool has a cylindrical shaft sized for a close sliding
fit with the passage 3244 and
includes a laser pointer arranged to project a beam coaxial with the shaft. In
this embodiment the shaft of
the alignment tool terminates in an Allen key fitting complementary to the
socket 3160. During installation
the tool is inserted into the passage 3244 and engaged with the socket 3160.
When engaged, the
alignment tool can be used as a lever and may be manipulated until its
projected beam is focused on a
target, such as a receiver. The passage 3244 thereby provides a convenient
means for providing a visual
indication of the alignment of the housing 3200. The alignment tool may then
be simply rotated about its
axis to lock the housing 3200 in the correct alignment.
As previously described, it is desirable that the power supply, in this case
the battery 3090, is only
connected (to activate the transmitter) upon installation. The collar 3140 of
spindle 3240 carries at a point

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
62
on its circumference a magnet 3150. The relative position of the magnet 3150
and the lobe of the cam
3100 is selected so that when the brake shoe 3110 is in an advanced,
'braking', position the magnet 3150
interacts with a reed switch (not shown) mounted on a rear face of the PCB
3070 to close the switch and
thereby connect the power supply and activate the transmitter 3000. The
location of the magnet about the
collar 3140 relative to the lobe of the cam 3100 is selected so that when the
brake shoe 3110 is in the
retracted, 'articulation', 'position the magnet 3150 does not act on the reed
switch, so that the reed switch
remains open, and the receiver remains inactive.
The transmitter unit 3000 is simple to install. The transmitter 3000 can be
supplied as a preassembled
unit ¨ with the locking mechanism in the retracted, articulation, position so
that the battery is not
connected and does not run down. The backing plate, which is attached to the
rear casing 3020 with a
simple snap fit is levered off (i.e. unsnapped) and screwed or otherwise
fastened to a wall or other
mounting surface. The.rear casing 3020, and the remainder of the transmitter
3000 attached thereto, is
then simply snapped onto the backing plate. The housing is then aligned using
the aforedescribed
alignment tool and then easily and conveniently locked in said alignment and
activated with a single
motion of the same tool.
Figures 27 and 28 illustrate a further alternative embodiment of the invention
similar to the embodiment
described in figures 24 to 26. Figure 28 is analogous to figure 25 however it
illustrates a receiver 3000'
useable in an embodiment of the present invention. Receiver 3000' includes a
passage 3244' through
which a spindle 3240' May be accessed as in the previous embodiment. This
embodiment differs from the
embodiment of figure 24 in the details of the locking mechanism. The spindle
3240' includes an integrally
formed cam 3100' arranged to act on a pivotally mounted lever arm 3210.
The lever arm 3210 has a length in the sideways direction, i.e. perpendicular
to the up and down and fore
and aft directions. A stud at 3120' projects forwardly from one end of the
lever arm 3210. The stud 3120'
is received within a complementary recess (not shown) defined within the
receiver housing 3200' at which
the lever arm 3210 is pivotally supported within the receiver housing 3200'.
Short studs 3230 project in the fore and aft directions from the other end of
the lever arm 3210. The studs
3230 are coaxially aligned. A brake shoe 3110' including an upwardly
projecting clevis arrangement
embraces the other end of the lever arm and engages with the studs 3230 to
pivotally connect the lever
arm 3210 and brake shoe 3110'. The brake shoe 3110' projects downwardly from
the lever arm 3210,
and has a square cross section and determinates in a part spherical braking
surface 3130'.
The brake shoe 3110'. is seated within and guided by a tubular through hole
(not shown), having a
complementary square profile, within the receiver housing 3200'.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
63
During installation of the receiver 3000' the spindle 3240' is rotated, as in
the previous embodiment. As
the spindle 3240' is rotated the cam 3100' acts to drive the lever arm 3210
downwardly about its pivot
axis (defined by the stud 3120'). The braking shoe 3110' is in turn pushed
downwardly to frictionally
engage an internal surface of the fixed mounting portion.
The lever arm 3210 includes an integrally formed finger 3220 projecting
downwardly, from the end of the
lever arm 3210, at an acute angle from a main body of the arm. The finger 3220
defines a curved path an
outer surface of which is complementary to an interior of the transmitter
housing 3200'. The finger 3220 is
dimensioned to press against said interior and thereby bias the lever arm 3210
to rotate upwardly about
its pivot axis (defined by the stud 3120'). The brake shoe 3110' is thereby
biased against the cam towards
a retracted, non-braking, position.
As noted previously the soiling of optical surfaces over time can cause
problems in beam detectors. To
address this problem the inventors have determined that the system can be
adapted to compensate for
soiling of the optical system over time. Figure 29 illustrates how the true
received light level i.e. the level
of light arriving at the system's receiver or light sensor decreases over
time. Figure 29 shows a plot
between times t1 and t2 of the true light level arriving at a sensor of a beam
detector receiver over time.
As can be seen from the plots the received light level at wavelengths Al and
A2 decrease gradually over
time due to the build up of contamination on the surfaces of the optical
system of the receiver. To
compensate for the loss of sensitivity, in one embodiment of the present
invention, the system gain is
correspondingly increased very slowly over time (as indicated in figure 30)
such that the detected
intensity A1 and A2 remains substantially stable over time.
Figure 31 is similar to that of figure 30 except, as can be seen the
degradation in performance in
wavelength bands Al and A2 are different. In this embodiment, the signal at A2
is more greatly influenced
by the contamination of the optics than that at Al. In such a scenario, a
system which uses a differential,
or relative value between the received signals in two wavelength bands as
likely to go into a false alarm
state as the separation between the received signal at wavelength Al and A2
increases. To address this
problem, the gain is adjusted differently for each wavelength, and as can be
seen when the gains are
adjusted, as in figure 30 the long term average output of the system remains
substantially constant.
In the examples of figure 31 and 32 a smoke event 3500 occurs approximately
midway between times t1
and t2. In this case, because Al effectively operates as a reference
wavelength it undergoes a very minor
drop in intensity whereas the received signal at A2 undergoes a very marked
drop due to A2's tendency to
be more strongly absorbed by small particles. As can be seen, because the
smoke event has such a
short duration in comparison to the compensation being applied to the gains
the long term compensation
for system contamination is not affected by the occurrence of the smoke event
3500 and the smoke event
3500 is also reliably detected by the system.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
64
Referring to figures 33 to 35, a light source 3300 according to an embodiment
of the present invention is
depicted. The light source 3300 includes a housing 3302 with a transmission
zone 3304 through which
light is transmitted from the light source 3300 to a receiver 3306.
The transmission zone 3304 is in this instance located on the exterior of the
housing 3302 and provides
the point at which light from within the housing 3302 is transmitted from the
light source 3300 towards the
receiver 3306. As such, the transmission zone 3304 is accessible from outside
the light source 3300 and
may be affected by dust/dirt build up, insect/bug activity etc. The
transmission zone 3304 may, without
limitation, be any optical surface (or part thereof), and while for
illustration purposes has been depicted as
protruding from the housing 3302 it may, of course, be flush with or recessed
within the walls of the
housing 3302. The transmission zone 3304 may be integral with the housing 3302
or may be a
component part thereof.
In the present embodiment the housing 3302 houses a first light emitter 3308,
a second light emitter 3310
and a third light emitter 3312. Each light emitter 3308 to 3312 is an LED and
emits a beam of light (3314,
3316 and 3318 respectively) which is transmitted through the transmission zone
3304 to the receiver
3306. The first light emitter 3308 and third light emitter 3312 emit
electromagnetic radiation in a first
spectral band, e.g. UV light (i.e. light in the ultraviolet portion of the EM
spectrum) of substantially equal
wavelength, and as such shall be referred to as UV emitters. The second light
emitter 3310 emits EM
radiation in a second spectral band, e.g. IR light (i.e. in the infrared
portion of the EM spectrum) and as
such shall be referred to as a IR emitter. Correspondingly, light beams 3314
and 3318 will be referred to
UV light beams and light beam 3316 will be referred to as a IR light beam.
The light source 3300 also includes a controller 3320 adapted to control
operation of the first, second and
third light emitters 3308 to 3312. The controller may be housed within the
housing 3302 as shown, or may
be remote from the housing and control operation of the light emitters 3308 to
3312 remotely.
As will be appreciated, the specific manner in which the light emitters 3308
to 3312 are operated by the
controller 3320 depends on the programming of the system. In this embodiment
the controller 3320
alternates operation of the light emitters 3308 to 3312 in a repeating
alternating sequence. The
processing of these beams as received by the receiver 3306 is discussed in
further detail below.
The controller may also be adapted to operate one or more of the light
emitters 3308 to 3312 to send a
control signal to the receiver 3306. Such a control signal may indicate status
information regarding the
light source 3300, for example, convey that the light source 3300 is
operational, that the light source 3300
is malfunctioning, and/or that the light source 3300 battery is running out.
The control signal may be
determined by the timing and/or intensity of the light beams 3314, 3316 and/or
3318 as emitted by
respective light emitter 3308 to 3312.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
As can be seen, the UV light emitters 3308 and 3312 are separated from each
other which, in turn, leads
to a separation of the point at which the UV light beams 3314 and 3318 leave
the transmission zone
3304. The separation between the UV light emitters (and UV light beams 3314
and 3318) is of sufficient
distance such that if the transmission zone 3304 is obstructed by a foreign
body 3322 only one of the UV
5 light beams 3314 or 3318 may be obstructed. A separation of approximately
50mm between the first and
third light beams 3314 and 3318 has been found suitable for this purpose.
Thus, this arrangement
effectively provides a redundant light emitter in the UV band.
The term "foreign body" is used here to refer to objects or nuisance particles
larger than dust or smoke
particles or other particles of interest that may be present in the air. As
one example, a foreign body
10 obstructing the transmission zone 3304 may be an insect or bug crawling
over the transmission zone
3304.
Figure 34 shows an example of a single UV light beam 3318 being obstructed,
with the remaining IR light
beam 3314 unobstructed. In this instance the receiver 3306 recognises a fault
condition because it only
received every second expected UV pulse rather than an alarm condition.
15 Should this condition (i.e. the condition where only one of the UV light
beams 3314 or 3318 is being
received at the receiver 3306 or is received at a significantly lower level
than the other due to partial
obstruction) persist for a significant time, e.g. 1 minute, the receiver 3306
may be programmed to
interpret this as an error/malfunction with the light source 3300 and trigger
an appropriate alarm/error
message.
20 In contrast to the obstruction shown in figure 34, figure 35 depicts the
situation where smoke particles
3324 in the air obstruct all three beams 3314 to 3318. In this instance the
smoke 3324 attenuates each of
the light beams 3314 and 3318 to substantially the same extent, and the usual
alarm logic can be applied
to determine whether an alarm or fault condition exists.
Figure 36 provides an alternative to the above embodiment. The light source
3600, similarly to the
25 previous embodiment includes a housing 3602 and a transmission zone (or
window) 3604 through which
beams 3614, 3616 and 3618 are emitted to a receiver 3606. The operation of the
light source 3600 is
controlled by a controller 3620. UV light beams 3614 and 3618 are emitted from
a single UV light emitter
3626. In this case the light source 3600 includes a beam splitter 3628 which
splits the beam from light
source 3626 such that the first and third light beams 3614 and 3618 exit the
transmission zone 3604 at a
30 sufficient distance from each other as described above.
Turning to figures 37 to 40, a further alternative embodiment of a light
source 3700 for use in a particle
detection system is provided. Light source 3700 includes a housing 3702 with a
transmission zone 3704

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
66
through which light is transmitted from the light source 3700 to a receiver
3706. The transmission zone
3704 is as described above in relation to transmission zone 3604, however as
can be seen is much
smaller.
Housing 3702 houses first and second LED light emitters 3708 and 3710. Light
emitter 3708 is a UV light
emitter and emits a UV light beam 3712, while light emitter 3710 is an IR
light emitter and emits IR light
beam 3714. The light source 3700 also includes a controller 3716 adapted to
control operation of the first
and second light emitters 3708 and 3710. The controller may be housed within
the housing 3702 as
shown, or may be remote from the housing and control operation of the light
emitters 3708 and 3710
remotely.
As can be seen, the light source 3700 is configured (as described below) such
that the light beams 3712
and 3714 leave the light source from the transmission zone 3704 along
substantially the same path. Most
preferably they are co-linear. This arrangement provides the feature that if
the transmission zone 3704 is
obstructed by a foreign body 3718 as shown in figure 38 (again, for example,
an insect crawling across
the transmission zone) the UV and IR light beams 3712 and 3714 are obstructed
to a substantially
equivalent degree.
When a foreign body 3718 obstructs the transmission zone 3704 it causes
substantially equal obstruction
to both the first and second beams 3712 and 3714, and the controller
associated with the receiver will
apply alarm and or fault logic to determine the cause of the decreased
received light level. The fault and
alarm logic can be configured to interpret an equivalent and simultaneous drop
in received intensity in the
following manner. In some cases with a small drop in intensity the system may
interpret this as a fault or
obstruction. If the condition persists it can be compensated for in software
or a fault condition raised. With
a large drop in intensity an alarm may be raised, even though the primary
alarm criteria are based on
differential attenuation of the two wavelength bands as described in our co-
pending patent application.
Figures 37 and 38 provide one embodiment of a light source 3700 configured to
provide beams 3712 and
3714 that leave the light source 3726 from the transmission zone 3704 along
substantially co-linear
paths. In this embodiment light beams 3712 and 3714 do not originate from
light sources 3708 and 3710
that are physically proximate, but are brought into proximity with each other
prior to reaching the
transmission zone with light directing optics 3722. Light directing optics
3722 may be any optics suitable
for directing light, such as mirrors, lenses (e.g. convex, concave, Fresnel
lenses) and/or prisms, or a
combination thereof, and may also serve to collimate light beams 3712 and
3714.
Figure 39 provides an alternative embodiment of a light emitter 3724
configured such that the light beams
3712 and 3714 leave the light source from the transmission zone 3726 close
together. In this embodiment
the first and second light emitters 3728 and 3730 are semiconductor dies
housed within a single optical
package 3732 (the transmission zone 3726 being the point at which the emitted
light beams 3712 and

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
67
3714 exit the package 3732). In this embodiment the proximity of light beams
3712 and 3714 is achieved
by the physical proximity of the semiconductor dies 3728 and 3730 within the
package 3732 and the
leasing effect of the package 3732.
This may be achieved by using an LED with multiple semiconductor dies in a
common LED package.
Examples are depicted in Figure 47 to 49. As with typical LED's, the housing
is made of a clear material
and shaped so as to have a lens effect on the emitted light beams that broadly
constrains the beams to a
forward direction.
In a further embodiment, and as shown in figure 41 and 42, the light source
3700 is also provided with
beam shaping optics 4102 for adjusting the shape of light beams emitted from
light emitters 3708 and
1 0 3710. Whilst depicted as a single element in figure 41, the beam
shaping optics 4102 may in practice
(and as shown in figure 42) include a number of beam adjusting elements
serving variously to adjust the
beam width and/or beam shape of light transmitted from the light source 3700
to the receiver 3706.
Light beams 3712 and 3714 (from light emitters 3708 and 3710) pass through the
beam shaping optics
4202 which function to provide an adjusted beam 4104 with desired
characteristics as discussed below.
As will be appreciated a beam will have a spatial intensity profile, or beam
profile, in a direction
transverse to its axis. Using the beam profile a beam width of a light beam
can be defined between two
points of equivalent intensity e.g. between the 3db points either side of a
maxima etc. One common
measurement of beam width is the "full width at half maximum" (FWHM) of the
beam. For example, the
adjusted beam 4204 in figure 42 is shown as having a wide section 4214 in
which the intensity of the
beam 4204 is above the predetermined threshold (depicted in black) fringed by
lighter beam sections
4216 where the intensity of the beam is below the predetermined threshold.
The beam shaping optics 4102 can be chosen to achieve a desired beam profile,
and a collimating
element 4208 serving to collimate light beams 3712 and 3714 into a tighter
beam shape. The collimating
element 4208 may, for example, be a lens such as a Fresnel lens or a convex
lens, or may be a reflector.
The beam adjusting optics can also include a diffusing element 4210, selected
to "flatten" the beam
profile and increase the beam width of the light beams 3712 and 3714. The
diffusing element can be for
example a ground/etched/smoked glass diffuser. The diffusing element 4210 may,
alternatively, be a
coating applied to either the transmission zone 3704 or another beam adjusting
element.
Figure 40 illustrates an exemplary optical element 4000 that shapes and
flattens the beam profile. The
optical element 4000 includes a Fresnel lens 4080 placed back to back with a
multi-element lens 4081.
The Fresnel lens collimates the beam and the multi-element lens 4081
effectively diffuses the beam. In

= CA 02760026 2016-08-05
68
place of the multi-element lens 4081 another diffuser eg. ground, smoked or
etched glass or surface
could be used.
Providing a diffuser on the transmitter is advantageous as the receiver will
"see" an extended spot
corresponding to the light source, rather than a point, which would be
observed without the diffuser.
Consequently, any foreign body (such as an insect) landing on the transmission
zone 3702 will cover a
smaller proportion of the transmission zone and therefore have a
proportionally smaller effect on the total
light received at the receiver 3706. Moreover, in a multiple beam system when
all light emitters (3708 and
3710, i.e. light at both the UV and IR wavelength) are diffused through a
common element any foreign
body (such as an insect) landing on the transmission zone 3702 will effect
each wavelength of the light
(i.e. UV and IR) by substantially the same amount.
Further by providing a greater beam width to the adjusted beam 4204 alignment
of the receiver 3706 with
the light source 3700 is simplified. Figure 43 provides a depiction of a
receiver 4350 receiving a beam
4352 from a light source 4354. By having a wide beam width the rate of change
of intensity across the
beam width (near its centre) is reduced. This means that as alignment of the
beam and receiver drift over
time, the rate of change in received intensity near the centre of the beam,
for small relative movements, is
reduced compared to a beam with a narrow beam width.
In this case the beam width 4356 of the beam 4352 corresponds to about three
sensor elements on the
sensor 4350. If the system is configured to average (or aggregate) output
these three pixels are used to
determine the received beam's strength, a small variation in alignment between
the transmitter and
received will require either the system to accurately track the beam movement
on the sensor's surface or
alternatively cause a large variation in measured signal strength from the
three pixels. This problem's
minimised using a wider beam width as shown in Figure 44. In this system the
beam 4462 emitted by the
light surface 4454 has a width 4456 equal to about the size of 6 sensor
elements on sensor 4450. As will
be appreciated such a system is more tolerant to alignment drift before the
central 3 pixels lie outside the
central high intensity beam region.
The specific properties of the diffuser used and the beam width provided will
depend on the receiver and
light emitters. Using LED's, however a beam width of approximately 10 degrees
has been found to be a
suitable compromise between the preservation of intensity of the adjusted beam
and width, so as to
accommodate for easy alignment of the receiver with the light source and drift
of the receiver and/or light
source.
Referring to figure 42, the profile adjusting element 4212 is selected such
that the beam profile of the
adjusted beam 4204 extends further in the horizontal direction than the
vertical. This serves to maximise
the intensity of the adjusted beam 4204 at the receiver whilst also
accommodating for the fact that
building movement typically introduces more variation in the horizontal plane
than the vertical plane.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
69
The light source can include a wavelength dependent profile adjusting element
4212 for providing a
different intensity profile to beams in different wavelength bands. The beam
adjustment element may
again be a lens, reflector, coating or similar selected to provide the desired
beam profile at each
wavelength is achieved.
, 5 The profile adjusting element 4212 has the effect of producing an adjusted
beam 4204 having a beam
profile in which the beam width of the UV light (originating from the UV
emitter 3708) is wider than the
beam width of IR light (originating from the IR emitter 3710). This is
depicted in figures 45 and 46 where
the light source 4500 transmits a beam 4502 in which the beam width of the UV
light 4504 is wider than
the beam width of the IR light 4506. This has the advantage that in the event
that the light source 4500 or
receiver 4508 moves (e.g. due to building movement) and the alignment
therebetween is disrupted, the
IR light 4506 (having a narrower beam width) will move out of alignment with
the receiver 4508 (i.e.
reducing the amount of IR light received at the receiver) before the UV light
4504 does. This produces a
decrease in IR light intensity at the receiver, followed by a decrease in UV
intensity as alignment become
progressively worse. This is the opposite to the effect seen when smoke enters
the beam, when UV drops
before IR. Hence the misalignment can be distinguished from a smoke event by
the fault/alarm logic of
the controller.
As an alternative to using a profile adjusting element, a light source may be
used with a plurality of UV
light emitters surrounding one or more IR light emitters. In this case as the
alignment of the light source
and receiver is disrupted the receiver will cease to receive IR light before
it ceases to receive the UV light
beam, thereby allowing the receiver to interpret this as a fault rather than
an alarm event.
In some embodiments an exotic intensity profile can be formed, e.g. an
intensity profile having a sinc
function or similar. In this case if a sensor element or group of sensor
elements of the receiver's sensor
detects a variation in received beam intensity that matches the spatial
intensity profile of the transmitted
beam , it can be determined by the controller that the beam is sweeping across
the sensor element or
group of sensor elements. This can be used by fault logic to detect and signal
that the system is drifting
out of alignment and either re-alignment is needed or soon will be needed.
Figure 47 illustrates a light emitter 4740 which may be used in a transmitter
of a beam detector according
to an embodiment of the present invention. The light emitter 4740 includes a
body 4742 in which is
housed one or more light emitting elements (not shown), The emitter 4740
includes a lens or window
portion 4744 through which the beams of light generated by the light emitting
elements are emitted. It also
includes a plurality of leads 4746 for making electrical connection to the
device. Figure 47illustrates a plan
view of the same light emitter 4740. The light emitter 4740 includes a
plurality of light emitting elements
4748, 4750. In this case the light emitter is a LED and the light emitting
elements are two LED dies in the
form of a UV LED die 4748 and an IR LED die 4750 which constitute the light
emitting elements. The
package 4740 also includes a photodiode 4752 within the body 4742. Each of the
light emitting elements

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
4748, 4750 are adapted to emit light through the lens 4744. The photodiode
4752 receives some
proportion of the light emitted by the light emitting elements 4748, 4750 and
generates an electrical signal
which is fed to a feedback circuit. The photodiode output signal is used by
the feedback circuit to adjust
the output of the light emitting elements to maintain correct operation of the
light emitter 4740.
5 Figure 49 illustrates a second embodiment of a light source. In this
example, the light emitter 4955
includes a plurality of light emitting elements arranged in a checkered
pattern. In this case, the light
emitter 4955 includes four UV LED dies 4958 arranged around a central IA LED
die 4960. As described
above, this arrangement may have particular advantages for preventing false
alarms caused by a
misalignment of the light source with its respective receiver. The package
4955 also includes a photo
10 diode 4952.
Figure 50 illustrates a schematic block diagram of circuit for a transmitter
which may be used in an
embodiment of the present invention. The circuit 5000 includes two light
emitters 5002, 5004 which e.g.
correspond to the infrared and UV LED dies as described above. It also
includes a photodiode 5006. As
will be apparent from the above description the LEDs and photodiode 5002,
5004, 5006 may be
15 packaged closely adjacent to each other within a single LED package.
However, they may also be
separately packaged in individual components. The light emitters 5002, 5004
are electrically connected to
a current source 5008 and the photodiode 5006 is electrically connected to a
feedback circuit 5010. The
feedback circuit 5010 is in communication with the current source 5008. In
use, the output from the
photodiode 5006 which represents the output of LEDs 5002, 5004, is passed to
the feedback circuit 5010
20 which in turn controls the output of the current source 5008 to the light
emitters 5002, 5004. As the
received light signal at the photodiode 5006 decreases, for example due to
decreased light output by the
LEDs over time or through decreased light emission of the light emitters 5002,
5004 due to an increase in
temperature, the feedback circuit 5010 will apply an output to the current
source 5008 which causes an
increase in the drive current to the light sources 5002, 5004. In this way,
the light output of the light
25 emitters 5002, 5004 can be maintained at an approximately constant level.
Because the light emitters
may have different characteristics and predetermined illumination
characteristics required for correct
system operation, the output of the two light emitters 5002, 5004 can be
individually controlled and
adjusted. This can be achieved by alternatively pulsing their illumination and
individually determining their
light output using the photodiode 5006. Alternatively, multiple photodiodes
could be used in a manner in
30 which their response is wavelength selective, and tuned to a
corresponding light emitter. For example this
may be achieved by providing different bandpass filters over each of the
photodiodes. In this case, the
light emitters 5002, 5004 can be simultaneously illuminated and their outputs
individually stabilised using
a feedback circuit as described herein. Figure 51 illustrates the feedback
procedure of the circuit of figure
50 in stabilising the light output of one light emitter which is continuously
illuminated. The plot of figure 51
35 includes a first portion 5102 which represents the output of the
photodiode over time and represents a
decrease in light output from the light source over time. This output is fed
into the feedback circuit which

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
71
controls the drive current output by the current source 5008. The decrease in
the photodiode output
causes an increase in the LED output current as shown by plot 5104.
Figure 52 illustrates a second circuit in a schematic block diagram form. In
this example, rather than
controlling the output current of the current source, the duration of output
pulses of the light emitters is
controlled by the feedback circuit. Accordingly, figure 51 includes two light
sources 5202, 5204 each of
which is connected to a current source 5208. The circuit also includes a
photodiode 5206 which is
connected to a feedback circuit 5210. This circuit 5200 additionally includes
a drive pulse modulation
circuit 5212 which controls the timing and duration of the pulses of current
applied to the light emitters
5202, 5204 by the current source 5208. In this example, when a decrease in the
received light level
received by the photodiode 5206 is sensed the feedback circuit 5210 applies a
signal to the modulation
circuit 5212. In response, the modulation circuit 5212 increases the pulse
length produced by the current
source 5208 that is applied to the LEDs.
Figure 53 illustrates the method of operation of the circuit of figure 52. The
top plot illustrates the output of
the photodiode 5302, which as can be seen, generally decreases over time. The
lower plot 5304
illustrates the drive current applied to the light emitters. In this case, the
output current is applied in
square wave pulses e.g. 5306. As the output of the photodiode decreases the
duration of the pulses
increases over time. By adjusting the pulse duration in this manner and
maintaining the current at a
constant level the effective light intensity transmitted by the light
emitters, when integrated over the pulse
length remains substantially constant. Advantageously it also results in more
accurate reception of the
pulses at the receiver since rather than the receiver simply taking a single
sample of the light intensity
within each pulse the receiver can be operated as an integrator and collects
more of the transmitted
signal.
The plots of figures 51 and 53 illustrate the photodiode response and drive
circuit current for a single light
emitting element of the transmitter. A similar plot can be created for the
other (or others) light emitting
elements.
In another embodiment of the present invention open loop control of the LED
intensity may be provided.
For example, this may be achieved at low cost by providing a current drive
circuit that is temperature
stabilised or temperature compensated for the output characteristics of the
LED.
In a further embodiment of the present invention the output of the light
emitting elements may only be
weakly controlled, for example by being driven by a fixed pulse length with a
very simple current control
circuit. In this case, the averaged output intensity which is measured by the
photodiode can be
communicated to the receiver. The receiver can then be configured to
compensate for the changing LED
output in software. In a preferred form the averaged LED output can be
communicated to the receiver
using an optical communications channel or other wireless communications
channel. In a case where an

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
72
optical communications channel is used, this can be implemented by modulating
the output of the light
emitters themselves by inserting or omitting pulses in the sequence of
illumination pulses of one or the
other, or both of the light emitters. This embodiment has the advantage of
requiring only a relatively low
cost transmitter without complex feedback circuitry. It also takes advantage
of the fact that temperature
and age related drift of the light emitter outputs is likely to be relatively
slow so the bandwidth of the
communications only needs to be low.
A further problem that can arise in the methods described above which use one
or more photodiodes to
measure and control the output intensity of the light emitters is that ambient
light may interfere with this
measurement. For example, sunlight may be received by the photodiode and
erroneously increase the
detected output light level of the light emitting element as detected by the
photodiode.
To overcome this problem, in one embodiment, the effective ambient light can
be greatly reduced by
using a band pass filter in conjunction with the photodiode. For example, a
photodiode which only passes
light in a wavelength band emitted by its corresponding light emitter, but
which attenuates all other
wavelengths e.g. those commonly occurring in sunlight can be effectively used.
Similarly, if artificial
lighting such as fluorescent lighting is used, the band pass filter can be
adapted to exclude substantially
all of the artificial light whilst still transmitting light in a wavelength
band transmitted by the corresponding
light emitter.
In an alternative embodiment, light absorbing baffles may be positioned around
the photodiode e.g. in the
LED package such that only light from the light emitting elements can reach
the photodiode. The
photodiode can be shielded from external light by placing a baffle between the
photodiode and the lens of
the LED package.
A further mechanism for correcting for background light levels is to take
measurements from the
photodiode when the light emitters are in 'on' and `off' conditions. In this
case measurements taken during
the 'off' periods, between pulses of the light emitters, represent the
background light. This background
light level can be subtracted from the next (or previous) light level measured
during an `on' period i.e. a
time period in which a light emitter element is illuminated. The background
light level can be averaged
over several 'off' frames and a sliding average of the background level
subtracted from the `on' period
data if smoothing of the background light levels is required. For example,
this may be needed when the
ambient light level varies greatly with a frequency equal to or substantially
equal to the pulse frequency of
the light emitters.
Figure 54 illustrates a light source made in accordance with an embodiment of
the present invention. The
light source 5400 includes a light emitter 5402 electrically connected to a
control circuit 5404 which is
powered by a power source 5406. The light emitter 5402 projects a beam (or
beams) of light through an
optical system 5408 towards a receiver. In some embodiments, the optical
system 5408 may simply be a

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
73
transparent window through which the beam of light is projected in use, but
also may be a more
complicated optical arrangement e.g. including one or more lenses, mirrors or
filters etc. that are adapted
to cause the beam of light emitted by the light source 5402 to take on
particular beam characteristics. As
described above the external surface of the optical component 5408 is prone to
temporary occlusion by
insects or the like on its outer surface.
In order to detect these foreign bodies, the light source 5400 is provided
with a photodiode 5410 or other
light sensitive element .which is connected to the control circuitry 5404. In
use the photo diode 5410 is
arranged such that it will receive scattered light from foreign bodies
occluding at least part of the outer
surface of the optical arrangement 5408. The photo diode 5410 is connected
back to the control circuit
5404 which is adapted to determine based on the integrity of the received
scattered light by photo diode
5410 whether a fault condition exists. For example the control circuit 5404
can include a micro controller
5412 which is programmed with, inter alia, fault logic which compares the
received feedback signal from
the photo diode 5410 to a predetermined threshold and if the received
intensity is above the
predetermined threshold, or some other intensity and/or time based criteria
are met by the feedback
signal, the fault logic can be adapted to trigger a fault response in the
light source 5400. For example, the
microcontroller may cause an illumination pattern of the light emitter 5402 to
change in response to the
fault condition to signal to a receiver of the particle detection system that
a fault condition exists. By
encoding a particular signal in the light emission patent the type of fault
could be signalled back to the
receiver. The fault condition could be communicated by modulating the
amplitude, duration and/or the
timing of the transmitted light pulses in a predetermined fashion. This has
the advantage that no wiring or
other wireless communication systems are required between the transmitter and
receiver of the particle
detection system.
Figures 55 and 56 illustrate alternative embodiments of this aspect of the
present invention, and common
parts have been numbered with common reference numerals.
Turning first to figure 55 which shows second embodiment of a light source
5500 made in accordance
with an embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the light
source 5500 has been
provided with an additional light emitting device 5502. This light emitting
device is placed such that it
illuminates the lens frorn a shallow angle of incidence. This increases the
chance that particles or foreign
bodies which fall on the external surface of the optical component 5408 will
produce a sufficient reflection
to be detected by the photo diode 5410. In this embodiment, the photo diode
can be shielded by a wall or
baffle 5504 to prevent direct illumination of it by the light source 5502.
Figure 56 illustrates a light source 5600. This embodiment differs from the
light sources illustrated in
figures 54 and 55 by the inclusion of an externally mounted light emitter
5602. This light emitter 5602 is
positioned such that it illuminates the outside surface of the optical
component 5408 directly. This may

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
74
have additional advantages in correctly identifying the presence of foreign
bodies such as insects or the
like on the external surface.
In some embodiments of the present invention the light source may be provided
with an internally
mounted feedback photo diode. This feedback photo diode is typically used to
monitor the light output of
the light source or sources and adjust the emission characteristics of the
light source e.g. if a decrease in
received light level is measured. However, the internal photo diode could be
used with embodiments of
this aspect of the invention by applying an upper threshold to its received
signal and if the received light
level is above the upper threshold (and is not the result of an increase in
light output caused by the
controller 5404) this may be determined to be the result of a foreign body on
the external surface of the
optical system 5408.
An embodiment of the present invention may also be able to be used with a
receiver of a particle
detection system. In this embodiment, the receiver can be fitted with a light
emitter such as that in figure
14 and photo diode and be configured to implement the method as described
herein in relation to a light
source. With the receiver, it is clearly advantageous that the transmission of
light within the receiver
housing does not interfere with the particle detection performance of the
system. Accordingly, the light
source 5502 can be selected such that it emits light outside the reception
band of the receiver, or the
receiver can be provided with a band pass filter which excludes the selected
wavelength. Alternatively, if
the light source of the. particle detector is set to flash according to a
predetermined pattern with 'off
periods' between flashes the foreign body detection function can be performed
in these 'off periods. If
foreign body detection in the 'off periods is to be used the light emitter
e.g. emitter 5502, can emit light in
the pass band of the receiver and the main receiver could be used to detect
the presence of foreign
bodies on the external surface of the optical component 5408.
As noted above, it is important for particle detectors to be properly
installed and commissioned. Correct
installation and commissioning ensures reliable and safe operation of the
system. In this regard several
processes that can be used in the set-up and commissioning of a particle
detection system will now be
described.
For the purposes of clarity, the following process description will focus on a
particle detector as described
in relation to Figure 2. However, the process may be implemented using the
implementations described in
relation to Figure 3 and other implementations, which will be apparent to a
person skilled in the relevant
art.
In one embodiment, the process includes two stages, comprising a commissioning
stage and an
operation stage. The commissioning stage is performed on initial installation
of the beam detector,
whereas the operation stage is performed some time after installation.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
A process for commissioning the particle detector is shown in Figure 58. A
technician or other suitable
installer mounts the light source 32, and receiver 34 and target 36 (which is
optional in other geometries)
in appropriate locations spanning an area requiring monitoring for particles
e.g. smoke (step 5801). As
discussed, with the use of a receiver 34 in the form of a video camera or
other suitable device, the
5 process of installation may be easier and quicker.
Following installation, in step 5802, the technician activates the detector by
powering the particle detector.
Initially the detector discovers the presence of light sources within its
field of view to monitor. As
described elsewhere here and in our co-pending application the controller
identifies the relevant portion(s)
of the detector's field of view that represent light from the light source 32
and then measures the strength
10 of the light signal received from the light source 32, in step 5803.
This identification process may be
manual, for example with the technician interfacing a portable computer to the
receiver 34, viewing the
image captured by the camera and indicating using a point and click device or
otherwise the relevant
portions of the field of view. The identification process may instead be
automatic, for example with the
controller 44 programmed to identify the parts of the screen illuminated by
the light source (e.g. UV and/or
15 infrared light in the case that UV and/or ultraviolet light sources are
used).
A detailed description of an exemplary method of target acquisition and timing
discovery can be found
elsewhere herein.
The level of light received from each identified source is compared to a
threshold value to determine if the
received light level is within acceptable limits in step 5804. If the
controller 54 receives light from the light
20 source 32 above a preset threshold, then it causes the particle detector
to indicate acceptable operation
(step 5805). Indication. of the status of the system can comprise constantly
lighting an LED on the
receiver 34, although other notification mechanisms may be used such as making
a sound and/or
transmitting a signal to a PDA or computer in communication with the
controller 44, for viewing by the
technician.
25 The detection system will apply alarm and fault logic to determine
either whether the detection system is
operating correctly or whether particles have been detected. The alarm and
fault logic will include alarm
criteria based on the intensity of light received at the receiver. This
criteria may be based on raw intensity
measurements, differential or comparative values at multiple wavelengths or
rates of change or other
measures known to those skilled in the art. Typically the criteria can be seen
as a comparison of received
30 data to a threshold level. The inventors have realised that since
Installation and commissioning of the
particle detection system is supervised by the technician and during
commissioning the system is not
relied on to provide a particle detection or life safety function, the usual
alarm thresholds may be largely
ignored in the commissioning stage. Thus the thresholds applied during
commissioning stage can be set
very tightly in comparison to one or more of the alarm or fault thresholds
that are applied during the
35 operating stage.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
76
In a preferred form at least one threshold used in the commissioning stage
will be set substantially above
a level that would cause the particle detector to generate an alarm, take
other action indicating that
smoke has been detected or raise a or fault in the operation phase.
For example the acceptable minimum level of light received during the
commissioning stage could be set
20% over a light level- that would cause a fault condition during normal
operation. Such a threshold
requires an installer to ensure that the initial alignment of the system is
highly accurate, the optical
surfaces are clean and in good condition and that the transmission path length
is not outside acceptable
ranges, otherwise the system would not achieve the relatively stringent light
intensity requirements in
place during commissioning.
If during the commissioning stage the controller 44 determines that the
intensity of the light received is
below the preset threshold, then the controller 44 causes the particle
detector to indicate an error (step
5806). This may, for example, comprise flashing an LED or transmitting a
signal to a FDA or computer of
the technician. If the identification of the relevant portions of the field of
view is automatic, the controller
44 may allow a manual identification process to be completed, following which
steps 5802 to 5804 may
be repeated.
On receipt of the error indication, the technician can perform the necessary
action to rectify the problem.
For example the technician can reposition the light source 32, receiver 34
and/or target 36, for example to
reduce the path length between the light source 32 and the receiver 34. Where
a substantial reduction in
path length is required and the initial installation used the target 36, the
technician may remove the target
36 and place the receiver 34 where the target 36 was previously located, to
halve the path length. The
technician could otherwise locate a suitable mid-point on which to mount the
components of the particle
detector.
The controller 44 may be programmed to complete its part of the process shown
in Figure 58
automatically on each power up. Alternatively, the process may be completed
only on command, for
example by the pressing of a button associated with the receiver 34, or on
receipt of a command through
a communication port of the receiver 34.
If the commissioning stage has been successfully completed, the receiver 34 is
in condition to start
operating. Two embodiments of this 'operation stage' are described below, the
first in relation to Figure 59
and the second in relation to Figure 60. During the operation stage, the
receiver 34 measures the
intensity of light received from the light source(s) 32. This data is
processed, and if the signal(s) received
indicates smoke is present in the light path between the light source(s) 32
and the receiver 34, the
controller 44 generates an alarm condition in the particle detector, and/or
communicates a signal to cause
another device (e.g. a fire panel) or system such as an automated evacuation
system, to generate an
alarm.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
77
In the preferred embodiments of the present invention, which operate a
multiple wavelengths, the primary
alarm thresholds are based on a differential measure of received light
intensity at more than one
wavelength, e.g. the ratio or difference between received light intensity at
two wavelength, or rates of
change of such measures. A secondary "fallback" threshold can be set on the
basis of the absolute or
corrected received light intensity at one or more wavelengths independently.
The detection of correct
operation and fault conditions can also be based on both differential or
absolute received light level.
Referring to Figure 59, the controller 44 is programmed to re-check the signal
strength received from the
light source 32, or each light source 32 (if there is more than one) against
an absolute signal strength
threshold. This check may be performed continuously or periodically, for
example, once a day, two or
more times a day, or at a lesser frequency, depending on requirements. The
check may also be
performed on command, for example on receipt of a command to check the signal
strength received at a
communication port of the receiver 34, or on actuation of a button provided in
association with the
receiver 34. If the controller 44 determines in step 5907 that no check is
required, the receiver 34
continues to monitor for smoke in the light path.
If a check is required, then in step 5908 the controller 44 evaluates the
signal strength of the light from the
light source(s) 32 and in step 5909 compares this to a threshold value. This
threshold value may be the
same as that used in step 5803, or may alternatively be another set value,
determined to indicate a
required level of reliability of operation.
In step 5910, the result of the comparison is evaluated and if the threshold
value for minimum required
intensity has not been exceeded, an error is indicated/generated (step 5911),
which error may be the
same as or different to the error indicated in step 5806, depending on the
particular implementation. For
example, the error indicated in step 5911 may be an audible signal generated
at the site of the particle
detector, and/or at a control station, such as a security station for a
building, and/or a remote monitoring
station by communicating the error over a wired and/or wireless public and/or
proprietary network.
If the threshold value for minimum required intensity has been exceeded, then
in step 5912, the particle
detector indicates acceptable operation, which may be indicated in the same
was as described for step
5805.
Referring to Figure 60, 'a flow chart of a process that may be completed by
the controller 44 to implement
an alternative operation stage is shown.
Following commissioning (i.e. following step 5805), the controller 44 in step
6016 determines if a delay
period has expired. This delay period may, for example, be 24 hours, after
which time it would be
expected that the particle detector is operating in a stable condition. Other
non-zero delay periods may be

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
78
=
used in other embodiments. Preferably during the delay period the detector is
not used for essential
particle detection purposes, and is only being monitored for correct
operation.
When the delay period has expired, the controller 44 re-sets its thresholds
(in step 6018). Preferably the
new thresholds to be used are based on either the measured signal strength (or
parameter derived
therefrom) that was measured in (optional step) 6015. Alternatively, it could
be based on a
measurement(s) made .upon the expiry of the delay (step 6017). The operational
threshold intensity could
also have a preset minimum value. Alternatively an acceptable threshold can be
determined by looking at
the performance of the system during the delay period, e.g. by analysing the
variation of received light
intensity at one or more wavelengths during the delay period. For example if
the variation in received light
intensity over the period caused by things other than the impingement of
particles of interest into the
beam (e.g. mounting drift, temperature dependent light output variations of
the light sources etc.) is 2%
then an acceptable minimum received light level could be set at 2% below the
average received light
level, or at some other level. The operational intensity may be a function of
both the measured intensity at
the end of the delay period and a preset minimum value, for example determined
as the average of the
two values. The operational threshold and present minimum value, if any, may
be determined/set
independently for each light path if there is more than one light path.
Next the controller evaluates the intensity of the light received from the
light source(s) 32 (step 6088A)
and compares it to the new operational threshold in step 609A.
Steps 600A to 602A may then proceed as described herein above in relation to
Figure 59, using the
operational threshold value determined in step 689A.
Where there are multiple light sources and/or multiple light paths from a
single light source, the error may
be indicated when the intensity of light received along any one of the
monitored light paths falls below the
threshold. Alternatively, there may be different levels of error condition,
with one level indicating when
light along one of the light paths falls below the threshold and another level
indicating when light alone
more than one or all paths falls below the threshold. The threshold may be
different for each light path,
reflecting for example differences in the intensity of light generated by the
light source 32 for that path.
In the foregoing description, reference has been made to individual light
paths from the light source(s) 32
to the receiver 34. Those skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that
light may be reflected off various
structures, such as a ceiling, and as a result there may be more than one
light path between a light
source and a particular point on a receiver. Implementations where light from
a source is received by the
receiver by multiple paths and where light from one light source is reflected
onto the part of the receiver
receiving light from another light source are intended to be within the scope
of the present invention.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
79
Turning again to Figure 57, in an installation such as this, the difference in
the intensity of light arriving at
the receiver 5702 from the transmitters 5704, 5706, 5708 can be adjusted in an
embodiment of a further
aspect of the invention by applying an optical attenuator to the optical path
of each transmitter in the
system, or at least those transmitters in the system which are located at a
distance likely to cause
saturation of the receiver 5702. Figure 61 shows exemplary housing which may
be used to implement this
mechanism. Figure 61 shows a cross sectional view through a transmitter
housing 6100. Within the
housing there is located a light source such as an LED 6102. This is connected
to appropriate circuitry
(not shown) and is used to generate a beam of light for use in particle
detection. The light emitted by the
light source 6102 may pass through one or more optical elements 6104 for
focusing the beam into an
appropriate shape eg a narrowly diverging column or broad divergent beam, or
some other shape as
discussed herein. The transmitter 6100 additional includes one or more optical
attenuators 6108 for
attenuating the beam emitted from the transmitter 6100. The level of
attenuation can be selected and set
at an appropriate level for the separation between the transmitter and its
corresponding receiver by using
one or more filters 6108 having suitable ???? characteristics. Multiple
filtering elements can be added in
series to achieve the appropriate attenuation level. An example of a system
with multiple filters is shown
in Figure 62. In Figure 62 like components have been numbered to correspond to
Figure 61. In a
preferred embodiment the housing 6106 of the transmitter 6100 can be
configured to have structures
6112 for receiving the filters 6108 (and 6110) in the appropriate position.
Most preferably, the receiving
mechanism enables selectable filters to be attached and removed by the
installer during commissioning
of the system. For example, the housing can include a plurality of grooves,
e.g. grooves 6112, which are
each adapted to receive an individual filter element.
Figure 63 shows three exemplary filter elements which may be used with an
embodiment of the present
invention such as that illustrated in figures 61 or 62. The filters 6300,
6301, 6302 are preferably neutral
density filters and can be made of an attenuating material, such as a plastic
film. Attenuators for different
distances can be made by increasing the level of absorption of the material
e.g. by changing material
properties or increasind thickness of the material.
Preferably each filter has indicia indicating the strength of the filter. For
example, an indication of a
preferred distance or distance range between the transmitter and receiver can
be printed, embossed or
otherwise displayed on the filter. Alternatively, a fractional attenuation
level can be displayed. This
information displayed on the filters can be used by the installers to
determine the appropriate filter or
group of filters to use with a transmitter for the particular system geometry
being installed.
An alternative (or complimentary) embodiment of this aspect of the invention
will now be described. In this
embodiment the system is adapted to enable the receiver to avoid saturation
without the use of a filter,
although filters could be used with this embodiment if necessary. Figure 64 is
a timing diagram illustrating
a second solution to the abovementioned problem according to an aspect of the
present invention.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
In this aspect of the invention a transmitter can be configured to emit a
sequence of pulses of differing
intensity and to repeat this sequence during operation. The receiver can then
determine which of the
received pulses falls within an acceptable light level at the receiver and
from that time forward choose to
receive only those pulses which have an acceptable light level.
5 Turning now to figure 64 the uppermost plot 6400 is a timing diagram
showing the transmission power of
a sequence of pulses emitted by a transmitter over time. The lower plot shows
the reception state of the
receiver. In an initial time period t1 the transmitter cycles through a
sequence of transmission pulses
6404, 6406 and 6408 of progressively increasing transmission power. This
sequence is repeated in time
periods t2 and t3 and continuously thereafter. In the first time period t1 the
receiver does not know which
10 transmission pulse is going to be at the appropriate level so as not to
saturate the receiver but also be
high enough to have adequate signal to noise ratio. Therefore, for time period
t1 the receiver is
continuously in an "on" state and is able to receive each of the transmitted
pulses 6404, 6406 and 6408.
On the basis of measured intensity of the three received pulses the receiver
can determine which pulse
should be received from then on. In this case, the pulse 6408 is determined to
have the correct intensity
15 and the receiver is configured to be activated at times 6410 and 6412 which
correspond to the time of
transmission of pulse 6408 in the successive transmission periods T2 and T3.
As described above the receiver and transmitter are generally not in
communication with each other, and
the transmitter will continue to emit three different level pulses throughout
its operation. Alternatively, in
an embodiment where the receiver may communicate back to the transmitter, the
receiver can signal to
20 the transmitter which of the pulses to continue emitting and which of
the pulses to omit. Such a system
will reduce the power consumption of the transmitter as fewer pulses will be
emitted.
The initial period of monitoring the various transmission pulses may be
extended beyond the single
transmission time period as it may be necessary for the receiver to discover
the pattern of illumination of
the transmitter over several transmission time periods.
25 In a third solution for ameliorating or addressing this problem a
further aspect of the present invention
uses electronic means to control the transmission power of the transmitter. In
this example a DIP switch
can be incorporated into the transmitter which during installation is set to
the appropriate transmission
level by the installer. The setting on the DIP switch can be chosen to either
reduce the current through the
LED and thus dim the LED or reduce the duration of the pulse "on period" to
avoid saturation of the
30 receiver. In this case it may be advantageous to have an installation
mode in which the transmitter emits
light at differing power levels initially. During this period the receiver can
determine the appropriate
transmission level and indicate to the installer the appropriate DIP switch
setting (or settings) to be made
to set the transmission level to the most preferable value. For example, the
receiver may be provided with
a display or other interface that can be used to indicate the DIP switch
settings for the transmitter. It

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
81
should also be appreciated that in a system with a plurality of transmitters
any process can be repeated
for each transmitter.
In a further embodiment of this aspect of the present invention a system
having multiple transmitters may
include transmitters of different types in it. Each transmitter type can be
optimised for use at a particular
distance or range of distances and in this case is up to the installer to
select what type of transmitter
should be installed.
Figure 65 illustrates an embodiment of a particle detection system 6500 being
tested using a test filter
according to an embodiment of another aspect of the present invention. The
particle detection system
6500 includes a light source 6502 a light receiver 6504. The light source 6502
generates one or more
beams of light including light in a first wavelength band 6506 which is in a
wavelength band centred at Al
and a second wavelength band 6508 centred at A2. Preferably, Al is a shorter
wavelength band, for
example in the ultraviolet part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and A2 is a
longer wavelength band e.g.
centred in the near infrared. The light beams 6506 and 6508 pass through a
test filter 6510 which mimics
the effect of smoke on the beam by alternating the beams 6506, 6508. The
operation of the receiver 6504
can then be checked to determine if its behaviour is correct given the extent
of beam attenuation being
caused by test filter 6510. Because the light emitted by light source 6502
includes light in two wavelength
bands Al and A2 the filter 6510 needs absorption characteristics which treat
these two wavelength bands
in an appropriate manner. In a preferred form of particle detector 6500, as
described above, a differential
measure of light intensity in the two wavelength bands Al and A2 (e.g. ratio
of measured intensities at
each wavelength or a rate of change of these values etc.) is used to determine
the presence of particles
of a predetermined size range within the beams 6506 and 6508. Most preferably,
if the ratio of the
received light intensities varies in a predetermined manner then a particle
detection event may be
indicated. Accordingly, in most cases the test filter 6510 does not attenuate
both wavelength bands
evenly but must provide a differential attenuation in the two wavelength bands
Al and A2 to mimic the
effect of smoke. In this example, the test filter 6510 absorbs the shorter
wavelength Al significantly more
than the longer wavelength A2. For example, the test filter can absorb twice
as much of the light in Al as it
does in A2, which may be determined to look like a particular type of
particle.
Thus the test filter characteristics are chosen to set both the ratio of light
transmitted (or attenuated) in
different wavelength bands and to also to vary the absolute level of light
transmitted (attenuated) by the
test filter. These two variables can be adapted to produce a suitable test
filter to mimic different smoke or
particle types as well as different smoke or particle densities.
Figure 66 illustrates a first exemplary test filter comprising three filter
elements 6512, 6514 and 6516. The
test filter 6510 is a generally sheet like material formed by three layers of
filter material. In this example,
the first two filter elements 6512 and 6514 attenuate light in wavelength band
Al and the third filter
element 6516 absorbs light in wavelength band A2. In this example each of the
filter elements 6512 to

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
82
6516 making up the test filter 6510 are configured to provide the same amount
of attenuation of light
passing through it. Accordingly, the test filter 6510 attenuates light in
wavelength band Al twice as
strongly as it does light in wavelength band A2.
Figure 67 illustrates a transmission spectrum for the test filter 6570. As can
be seen, the test filter
transmits substantially all of the light outside wavelength bands Al and A2
but attenuates about twice as
much of the light in wavelength band Al as it does light in wavelength band
A2. In other embodiments
transmission outside wavelength bands Al and A2 can be any level and need not
be uniform over all
wavelengths.
The absorption characteristics described above can be achieved in a wide
variety of ways. Figures 68 to
75 illustrate a range of these techniques. Others may be apparent to those
skilled in the art.
Figure 68 illustrates a filter element. The filter element has a front face
6802 to which is adhered a
plurality of particles having a particle size distribution substantially equal
to the particles to be detected
using the particle detector to be tested using the filter element. Such
particles can be manufactured using
a number of well known processes or selected by filtration and separation from
powder such as
aluminium oxide. Figure 69B illustrates a variant on this mechanism. The
filter element 6900 of figure 15B
includes particles similar to those used in the embodiment of figure 68, but
distributed through the bulk of
the filter element.
Figure 70 shows a filter element 7000 on which one or both surfaces has had a
surface treatment to
cause defects on the surface of the material. Surface defects can be generated
for example by
mechanical abrasion, particle blasting, chemical or laser etching or the like.
Alternatively defects may be
created through the bulk of the filter element in figure 70 using for example
3D laser etching.
Figure 71 and 72 illustrate further surface treatments that can be performed
on filter element 7100, 7200
to achieve predetermined attenuation characteristics. In these examples the
filter element is formed of a
substantially transparent material and is modified by the application of
surface printing. For example, an
inkjet or laser printer can be used to print a pattern on one or both surfaces
of the filter element sheet.
Preferably, a pattern of dots is printed over the entire surface of the filter
element. Most preferably the
dots of a uniform size. are printed at a predetermined separation which is
determined by the level of
attenuation to be achieved by the filter element. Figures 71 and 72 are
substantially identical apart from
the number of dots printed on the filter element. As can be seen, figure 71
has far less dots printed on it
than figure 72 and accordingly will be less absorptive than the filter element
of figure 15E.
Obviously other patterns can be used to achieve a predetermined attenuation.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
83
Figure 73 illustrates a printing pattern which can be implemented on a surface
of a filter element 7300.
This filter element 7300 is printed with two colour printing process and
includes a dot pattern which has
dots of a first colour 7304 and dots of a second colour 7306. As can be seen
there are more dots of
colour 6804 than of colour 6806 and accordingly the filter element will
attenuate more light in one
wavelength band than the other. Alternatively, a dot pattern in one colour,
could be printed on one side of
the filter element and a dot pattern on the other Side can be printed in the
second colour.
Figure 74 illustrates a test filter having a more complex structure. This test
filter element 7408 is made of
five layers 7410 to 7418. Four of the layers 7410 to 7416 attenuate light in
wavelength band Al but are
transmissive to all other wavelength bands, and the last layer 6818 absorbs at
wavelength band A2.
Figure 75 illustrates another test filter. This test filter has a central
portion 7420 which has characteristics
chosen to achieve a predetermined attenuation of light in wavelength bands Al
and A2 but it is laminated
with transparent layer 7422 and 7424 to protect the attenuating layers forming
the core 7420. This can be
particularly advantageous where the attenuating layers use a surface treatment
which may be damaged
by contact with other objects or substances.
In another embodiment one or both of the surfaces of the test filter can be
treated with a plurality of thin
films to create a predetermined wavelength selective attenuation profile.
Moreover, the filter elements can
be reflective rather than absorptive, to achieve the desired attenuation
profile.
Figure 76 illustrates a beam detector 7600 which includes a transmitter or
light source 7602 and receiver
7604. The transmitter 7602 includes one or more light emitters 7606 which are
adapted to generate one
or more beams of light 7608. At least a portion of the one or more beams are
received by the receiver
7604. Preferably, the light emitter 7606 is adapted to simultaneously generate
light within two wavelength
bands centered at different wavelengths )\., and X2 hereinafter termed
"wavelength bands 'Al and X2" for
transmission to the receiver 7604. The receiver 7604 includes a light sensor
7610 which is adapted to
output a signal representing the received light intensity at a plurality of
positions on its surface in the two
wavelength bands. The output in the two wavelength bands is passed to a
controller 7612 which performs
analysis on the output of the light receiver 7604 and applies alarm and/or
fault logic to determine whether
an action needs to be performed in response to the received signal or signals.
The receiver 7604 may
additionally include optical system 7614 for forming an image or otherwise
controlling the received beam
7608.
In an embodiment of the present invention where the light emitter 7606
simultaneously emits in two
wavelength bands X and 22 the sensor 7610 of the receiver 7604 is preferably
adapted to simultaneously
and distinguishably receive light in each of the wavelength bands. In order to
achieve this aim, the
receiver 7604 can be provided with wavelength selective component which is
adapted to split light in

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
84
wavelength band 2 from light and wavelength band2 and differentially direct
them to the sensor 7610 in
a manner which enables the two wavelength components to be separately
measured.
Figure 77 illustrates a first example of a receiver 7750 which enables this
technique to be performed. The
receiver 7750 includes a window 7752 through which a light beam 7754 enters
the receiver 7750. The
window 7752 may be a flat piece of glass or similar or alternatively may be
part of an optical arrangement
(e.g. a lens or series of lenses) adapted to form an image on or near the
light receiver. The receiver 7750
includes a sensor 7756 which includes a plurality of sensor elements 7758. A
wavelength selective
component 7760 is mounted adjacent the front face of the light sensor 7756 and
comprises for example,
a mosaic dye filter. The dye filter 7760 includes a plurality of cells 7762
and 7764. The cells 7762 are
adapted to be transmissive in a first wavelength band X1 and the cells 7764
are adapted to be
transmissive in a second wavelength band 2.2. The combination of mosaic dye
filter 7760 and light sensor
array 7756 enables a first group of sensor elements or pixels of the sensor
7756 to receive light in the first
wavelength band whilst other pixels of the sensor array 7756 simultaneously
receive and record light
intensity use in a second wavelength band 22.
The controller can then be configured to separate the intensity values in one
group (i.e. relating to one
wavelength band) from the other, e.g. the outputs of the sensor elements can
be selectively "read out" to
obtain the two wavelength band signals.
Figure 78 shows an alternative embodiment which achieves a similar result. In
this embodiment the
receiver 7800 is similar to that of figure 77 in that it includes an optical
component 7802 which may
comprise a window or focusing optics through which light enters the receiver
housing 7804. After passing
through the optical component 7802 the beam enters a wavelength selective
prism 7806 which is adapted
to divert light in different directions depending upon the wavelength of the
incident light. Accordingly, light
in wavelength band X," is transmitted into a first beam 7808 whereas light in
wavelength band x2 is
transmitted in a second beam 7810. The beam in wavelength band X1 falls on a
first sensor array 7812
and light in the second wavelength band X2 falls on a second sensor array
7814. As previously described
in relation to earlier embodiments, the sensor arrays 7812 and 7814 are
adapted to record the intensity of
light at a plurality of points on its surface simultaneously.
Figure 79 shows a second embodiment using a prism to split a beam into its
wavelength components. In
this embodiment the receiver 7820 includes a single sensor array 7822 adapted
to receive light via an
optical component 7824 and a beam splitting component 7826. The beam splitting
component is adapted
to split light in a first wavelength band from light in a second wavelength
band and to direct these in
different directions. This embodiment differs to that of figure 78 in that
rather than forming images in each
of the wavelength bands X, and ),..2 on separate sensor arrays the beam
splitting component 7826 is
mounted very close to the sensor array 7822. In this way, as the beam
splitting takes place very close to

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
the surface of the sensor array 7822. Effectively, this provides a separate
wavelength selective beam
splitter for a subset of pixels of the sensor element 7822.
Figure 80 illustrates a further embodiment of the present invention. This
embodiment illustrates a light
receiver 7850 including a housing 7852 in which is mounted a sensor element
7854. Light enters the
5 housing through an optical system 7856 and is transmitted to the light
sensor 7854. In this embodiment,
the sensor 7854 is a multi-layered sensor and includes n sensor layers 7854.1,
7854.2 through 7854.n.
Each sensor layer 7854.1 through 7854.n is adapted to receive light at a
different energy. This energy
separation is achieved by taking advantage of the phenomenon that different
energy photons will
penetrate at different depths into the sensor device 7854. In this case the
sensor device can be a silicon
10 light sensing element. In each layer of the sensor 7854 a spatially
distinct measure of light intensity can
be determined at its corresponding wavelength.
In each of the embodiments described above the signals at a plurality of
wavelengths can be processed
in accordance with the aforementioned methods to produce a particle detection
or fault condition output.
It should be appreciated that although the preferred embodiments were
described in connection with the
15 two wavelength system, three or more wavelengths may be used in some
embodiments.
Figures 81 and 82 show one embodiment of the present invention that includes a
transmitter 8101 for
emitting at least one beam of light 8102, and a receiver 8103 for receiving
the beam. The receiver 8103
has a light sensor having multiple photosensitive elements 8104. An example of
a suitable receiver is a
video imager whose sensors are arranged into a matrix of pixels. Each sensor
element produces an
20 electric signal that is related e.g. proportionally, to the intensity of
the light detected by that sensor.
In Figure 81, the transmitter 8101 is shown as being positioned opposite the
receiver 8103 across a
monitored space 8105. However it should be understood that the transmitter
8101 can be otherwise
located (i.e. not directly aiming the emitted beam toward the receiver 8103)
as long as the emitted beam
8102 crosses the monitored space 8105. The emitted beam 8102 can be directed
toward the receiver
25 8103 by an arrangement such as an optical reflector.
A diffusing means 8106 is provided in the path of the emitted beam 8102, so as
to produce a deliberately
diffused image of the beam on the receiver's sensor 8107A. Signals from the
sensor elements 8104 are
transmitted to a controller 8108, such as a processor.
The controller 8108 combines the signals from at least some of the sensor
elements e.g. only those on
30 which the beam falls, group 8109 to determine the intensity of the received
beam 8107A. Each sensor
element in the CCD 8103 can have a different inherent noise level, and a
different light conversion

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
86
efficiency. Therefore, in its calculations, the controller 8108 takes into
account information regarding the
sensor elements 8109A that are initially in alignment with the beam 8107A.
Based on the determined
intensity, the controller 8108 applies alarm logic and decides whether any
action, such as signalling an
alarm, or dispatching an alert or a message to an administrator or another
user, should be taken. In
previously described systems, the decision has been made based on whether the
determined intensity is
lower than a threshold value that corresponds to a presence of smoke
particles.
In Figure 82, the position of the transmitter 8101 is shown as being slightly
removed from its position as
shown in Figure 81. This change results in a change in the position of the
diffused beam image 8107B,
relative to the receiver 8103. Some of the sensor elements onto which the
diffused beam 8107B is
incident are outside the initial subgroup of sensor elements 8109 whose
signals are initially read by the
controller 8108. The controller 8108 is adapted to track the position of the
image of the beam across the
surface of the sensor 8103 and consequently integrates the received light over
sensors in a new region
8109A. As would be appreciated the group of sensors within the region 8109A is
different to that which
was originally used as group 8109, but the two groups (8109, 8109A) include
the same number of
sensors.
The sensor elements in the new region 8109A theoretically can have a different
inherent signal error than
the sensor elements in the original region 8109. However, this difference is
not significant. In this example
the average inherent noise level of the four newly integrated sensor elements
will be about the same as
that of the four sensor elements that are no longer used. Moreover, the
spacing (i.e. number and size of
gaps) between sensor elements remains substantially constant and thus no
additional light is lost in the
gaps between sensors elements.
This can be contrasted to the case of a sharply focused beam image where the
error related to the
received beam strength will change dramatically as the sharply focused beam
moves from one sensor
element to the next because the two sensors have different light conversion
efficiencies and the
difference is not ameliorated by averaging (as in the case of a more diffused
beam image). Further, as
the focused beam moves from one sensor element to the next it will scan past
the space between the
sensor elements, and there will be an intervening period where a substantial
amount of the beam power
will be lost in the space between the sensors. As described above, these
problems are mitigated by use
of a defocused image.
The following paragraphs describe examples of how the optics (i.e. imaging
system) used in the receiver
can be arranged so as to produce a deliberately defocused target. In this
specification, the term 'diffusing
means' should be read broadly to refer to any arrangement or component that
produces a diffused image
of the beam on the sensor.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
87
In the embodiment illustrated in Figure 83, the diffusing means 8301 includes
a focusing lens 8302 that is
located in the emitted beam's path.
The focusing lens 8302 has an associated focal point 8304. The emitted beam
8303 is either transmitted
directly by the transmitter (not shown) toward the lens 8302 or toward a
reflector (not shown) that reflects
the beam toward the lens 8302. In this embodiment, the relative positions of
the lens 8302 and the sensor
8305 are such that the sensor is displaced from the position where the focused
beam image 8306 is
located. The sensors 8305 therefore receive a beam image that is deliberately
slightly defocused. The
amount of focus and the amount of diffusion are controlled so that the signal
to noise ratio can be
obtained (achieved with a more tightly focused beam) while achieving a system
that is relatively stable
(achieved with a diffused or blurred image) even when there are movements in
the system.
In a further embodiment (Figure 84), the receiver 8310 includes a focusing
lens 8311. The light sensor
8312 is placed at the spot where the focused image is located. The diffusing
means in this embodiment
includes a diffuser 8313 that is placed somewhere between the lens 8311 and
the light sensor 8312 (e.g.
directly over the sensors). The received image is therefore deliberately
blurred. The diffuser 8313 can be
a piece of ground or etched glass or simply comprise an etched face on the
sensor itself.
In some cases, the diffusing means 8313 can be located somewhere in the
emitted beam's path to the
sensor 8312.
In some embodiments the transmitter may output a light beam having components
in two (or more)
wavelength bands, for example infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) light bands,
both emitted along a
substantially collinear Path. The two wavelengths are chosen such that they
display different behaviour in
the presence of particles to be detected, e.g. smoke particles. In this way
the relative change in the
received light at the two (or more) wavelengths can be used to give an
indication of what has caused
attenuation of the beam.
In some embodiments, the receiver may receive multiple beams, or multiple
transmitters may emit beams
to be received. The multiple beams are used together for the purpose of smoke
detection in the
monitored space. As with the previous embodiments, the sensors receive the
beams and send signals to
the controller. The controller analyses the signals, and determines which
portion of the signals contains
information most strongly related to the respective beams. At the conclusion
of this decision process, the
controller will have selected two portions of signals that are produced by
respective individual sensors or
groups of sensors, so the selected signal can most reliably be used to measure
the intensity of beams.
One way of selecting the sensors whose data can be most reliably used is to
view the image generated
by the receiver at the time of commissioning the smoke detector and selecting
the appropriate sensors.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
88
A further mechanism of ensuring that the calculated received beam intensity is
as close to the actual
intensity of the received beam as possible, may be performed by the
controller. The controller may decide
whether to use the value corresponding to a certain sensor element, according
to that element's
contribution to the overall image strength. For example, from the sensor
element outputs, the controller
can determine a 'centre-of-signal' position of the beam. The centre-of-signal
position is analogous to the
centre of mass position, except that instead of mass, it is the signal value
contributed by each pixel (i.e.
sensor element) that is used in the calculation. For example, the following
equation may be used:
Centre-of-signal position vector = {sum of (position vector of each
pixel)*(value of each pixelili{sum of
values from all the pixels}.
After the centre-of-signal position is determined, the controller may weight
the signal contributed to the
received beam intensify value by each sensor element (i.e. corresponding to
the electrical signal
generated by each sensor) according to the distance between that sensor
element and the centre-of-
signal position. In this way, the controller determines the sensor elements
whose signals best represent
the target image and that are least likely to be dropped from subsequent
measurements due to drift in the
beam image's position on the sensor.
Figure 85 illustrates an embodiment of a further aspect of the present
invention. In this embodiment, the
particle detection system 8500 includes a transmitter 8502 and a receiver
8504. The transmitter 8502
includes a light source .or light sources adapted to emit light including
light into wavelength bands X, and
X2. The light source 8502 can include a plurality of light emitting elements
each adapted to emit in a
different wavelength band, or a wide band light source. The transmitter 8502
can additionally include one
or more optical components e.g. 8506 for forming a beam of light of desired
beam profile or dispersion
characteristics. The receiver 8504 can also include a light directing or image
forming optics 8508 which
are adapted to form an image of the beam on a sensor array 8510 of the
receiver 8504. In order to
minimise the interference of ambient light with the receiver 8504 the receiver
8504 is also provided with a
multiple passband filter arrangement 8512. For example, the multiple passband
filter can be an
interference filter which is arranged to selectively transmit light of the
first passband and second
passband corresponding to emission bands of the light source 8502. Most
preferably, the filter
arrangement 8512 is a multiple passband interference filter which has a
passband at a long wavelength
and one or more harmonics of that wavelength. In such an embodiment, the light
source 8502 must be
configured to emit light at similarly related harmonics. For example, a single
interference filter can be
designed to transmit substantially all light at 800 nanometres and also at 400
nanometres while blocking
a large majority of light at other wavelengths. When using such a filter the
light source can be adapted to
emit at 800 nanometres and 400 nanometres.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
89
In a further embodiment of the present invention the filter arrangement 8512
can include more than one
interference filter or dye filter or other similar type of filter used in
parallel. For example, two, or more
filters, corresponding to the number of wavelength bands in which the system
is configured to operate,
may be placed in side by side relationship in the imaging path of the
receiver. Figures 86 to 89 illustrate
examples of such filter arrangements. In this regard, the filter arrangements
of figure 86 to 89 include
portions adapted to transmit light in a first passband indicated by reference
symbol 8602 and shaded
white, and alternate portions shaded grey and indicated with reference numeral
8604, which are adapted
to transmit light in a second passband. Figure 88 is adapted for use in a four
wave length system and
therefore additionally includes portions indicated with reference numeral 8606
and 8608 which are
adapted to transmit light in a third and fourth wavelength bands. In each of
the filter arrangements, the
surface of the filter is approximately equally divided between the different
wavelength components and
thus transmit substantially even amounts of light in each wavelength band to
the receiver. Such an
arrangement has a disadvantage compared to the abovementioned multiple
passband filter arrangement
in that the effective receiver lens diameter is reduced e.g. by approximately
one half for each wavelength
in figures 86, 87 and 89, thus reducing the effective signal strength. However
this is to some extent
compensated for by the fact that the light source LED need not be at harmonics
of each other but can be
selected on other merits such as cost of goods. Moreover, the filters used in
such an arrangement may
be of lower cost and not require such accurate wavelengths centring and
therefore will not be so sensitive
to variations in transmitter output with temperature fluctuation.
Figure 90 illustrates a schematic representation of a fire alarm system in
which an embodiment of the
present invention can be used. The fire alarm system 9000 includes a fire
panel 9010 to which is
connected a fire alarm loop 9012. The fire alarm loop 9012 delivers power and
communication from the
fire panel to various pieces of fire alarm equipment attached to the system
9000. For example, the fire
alarm loop 9012 can be used to communicate with, and power, one or more point
detectors 9014 and
alarm sirens 9016. It can also be used to communicate with one or more
aspirated particle detectors such
as detector 9018. Additionally, a beam detector system 9020 can also be
attached to the fire alarm loop
9012. In the present invention the beam detector system 9020 can be of the
type described above in
relation to any of the embodiments herein and include a receiver 9022 at a
first end and at a transmitter
9024 located remotely to the receiver. Preferably, the transmitter 9024 is a
battery powered device and
does not require power to be drawn from the fire alarm loop 9012.
Alternatively, it can be powered e.g. off
separate mains power or loop. The receiver 9022 is connected to the fire alarm
loop 9012 and draws
power from the loop and communicates with the fire panel 9010 via the loop.
The means of
communication will be known to those skilled in the art and allow the beam
detector 9020 to indicate a fire
or fault condition or other condition back to the fire panel 9010.
The present inventors have realised that since smoke detectors do not need to
respond instantaneously,
acceptable average power consumption could be obtained by activating the video
capture and/or video
processing subsystems of the smoke detector intermittently, interspersed with
periods when processing

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
and capture is suspended. Thus the system can enter a "freeze" state in which
it is designed to consume
very little or no power.
A first way of achieving this solution is to provide the video processing
subsystem of the particle detector
with a simple timer unit which operates to activate the video capture and
processing subsystems
5 intermittently.
However, in the preferred form of the system the transmitter 9024 is not
powered from the loop or other
mains power, but is battery powered and is preferably not connected to the
receiver 9022 or in high
speed communication with it. Consequently the transmitter 9024 must emit light
at only very low duty
cycle to conserve power. In such a system the timing of each transmitted burst
of light may neither, be
10 controlled by the receiver or synchronised with any other receiver which
may also be communicating with
the same transmitter 9022.
Furthermore, during the video processor "freeze" period the receiver 9022 may
still be required to
manage other functions such as servicing polls from the fire alarm loop, or
blinking display LEDs or the
like. Therefore, using a simple timer mechanism to activate the system
processor and awake it from its
15 "freeze" state is not the preferred solution to this problem.
In a preferred form of the present invention the receiver 9022 employs a
secondary processor, having
much lower power consumption than primary processor, which is used to activate
the primary processor
and to deal with other functions that must continue without interruption when
the primary processor is in
its "freeze" state.
20 Figure 91 illustrates a schematic block diagram of a receiver 9100
embodying this aspect of the present
invention.
The receiver 9100 includes an imaging chip 9102 , e.g., a CMOS sensor
manufactured by Aptina Inc, part
number MT9V034, for receiving optical signals from a transmitter 9024.
It may optionally include an optical system 9104 e.g. a focusing lens, such as
a standard 4.5mm, f1.4 c-
25 mount lens, for focusing the received electro magnetic radiation onto
the imaging chip in the desired
manner.
The imaging chip 9102 is in data communication with a controller 9106 which
preferably is an Actel
M1AGL600-V2 field programmable gate array (FPGA), and an associated memory
9108 including a
PC28F256P33 flash ROM for program storage, two IS61LV51216 high-speed RAMs for
image Storage
30 and two CY621777DV30L RAMs for program execution and data storage. The
controller's function is to

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
91
control the image chip 9102 and perform the required sequence of data
manipulations to carry out the
functions required by the detection system. The control means has sundry
additional components as
required for correct operation as well understood by those skilled in digital
electronics design.
A second processor 9112 is also provided. This processor 9112 can be a Texas
Instruments
MSP430F2122 microcontroller or similar, and performs functions such as
checking the health of the
control means and if needed signalling fault to external monitoring equipment
if the control means fails or
if the control means, for any other reason, cannot perform its required tasks.
It is also responsible for the
timely control of power to the control and imaging means in order to minimize
power consumption. This is
performed by processor 9112 de-activating the main processor 9106 when it is
not needed and waking it
up intermittently when it is required.
Processor 9112 is also in data communication with interface means 9114 such as
a display or user
interface and is also connected to the fire alarm loop to enable data
communication with other equipment
connected to the fire alarm loop e.g. a fire panel.
In the preferred embodiment the interface 9114 means is used to notify
external monitoring equipment if
an alarm or fault condition exists. If it is determined by the receiver that a
fault exists, the interface means
notifies this to the monitoring equipment (e.g. fire panel 9010 of figure 3)
by opening a switch thereby
interrupting the current flow out of the aforementioned monitoring equipment.
In the preferred
embodiment the switch is a solid state arrangement employing MOSFET
transistors which has the benefit
of being activated and deactivated with very low power consumption. If it is
determined by the receiver
that an alarm condition exists, the interface means notifies this to the
monitoring equipment by drawing
current in excess of a predetermined threshold value from the monitoring
equipment. In the preferred
embodiment the excess current draw is achieved by the positioning of a bipolar-
transistor, current-limited
shunt across the interface wires from the monitoring equipment. A total
current draw of approximately
50mA is used to signal the alarm condition. In the preferred embodiment, power
for normal operation is
drawn from the connecting wires to the monitoring equipment at a constant
current of 3mA under non-
alarm conditions.
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention the transmitter 9024
includes a controller to control
its illumination pattern, illumination time, sequence and intensity for each
of the light sources, e.g. infra-
red and ultra-violet. For example this could be a Texas Instruments
MSP430F2122 microcontroller. The
microcontroller also detects activation of the device when first installed. In
the preferred embodiment of
the transmitter, the power source is a Lithium Thionyl Chloride battery.
In a preferred form of the present invention, during commissioning of the
system the main processor 9106
can be programmed to discover the illumination pattern of each of the light
sources (eg light source 9024
of figure 3) and over a period of preferably several minutes e.g. 10 minutes,
determine its activation

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
92
pattern. This process can be repeated for all light sources associated with
the receiver. The low power
processor 9112 can use the discovered light source sequencing information to
activate the primary
processor 9106 at the correct time.
As will be appreciated, by using a system of this structure the function of
the system which must operate
at all times can be controlled by the very low power consumption processor 911
2 whilst the highly
intensive processing can be performed intermittently by the main video
processor 9106, and in doing so
the average power cambe maintained at a relatively low level.
The inventors have determined that, there are various and often competing
constraints associated with
practical embodiments that must be dealt with when choosing the illumination
pattern of the transmitter
and corresponding receiver operation to accurately acquire and track a
transmitter output. For example,
in some systems it is desirable to use the rate of change of attenuation to
distinguish fault conditions from
particulate detection events. This complicates the use of long integration
times discussed in the
background. The preferred embodiment uses an integration period of 10 seconds
for normal
measurements, and a shorter integration period of one second is used for rate
of change based fault
detection.
Another constraint on system performance is the scene lighting level. For a
practical system it is usually
necessary to assume the scene may be lit by sunlight for at least part of its
operational life. There may
also be limitations on the ability to use wavelength selective filters on the
camera (e.g. at least cost
limitations). Therefore. it will be necessary to use short exposures to avoid
saturation, and still leave
sufficient head room for the signal. In preferred implementations of the
system the exposure duration is
100us, but the optimum value will depend on the choice of sensor, filter,
lens, worst case scene lighting
and the amount of headroom required for the signal.
A means of synchronising the receiver with the transmitter is also required.
It is preferable to achieve this
without the use of additional hardware such as a radio system. Instead in one
desirable implementation
the synchronisation is performed optically using the same imaging and
processing hardware that is used
for particle detection. However, as a person skilled in the art will
appreciate, the use of the same
hardware for particle detection as for synchronisation links two concerns
within the system, an thereby
imposes a further constraint on the possible solutions.
Another constraint within the system is due to the presence of noise. The
prime noise sources in the
system are camera shot noise and noise from light variations in the scene.
Dark noise is generally not a
significant contribution for systems that must deal with full sunlight. Scene
noise is dealt with very
effectively by the background subtraction method described in our earlier
patent applications. Shot noise
cannot be totally remoVed, as it is fundamental to the quantum detection
process. However, shot noise

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
93
can be reduced by reducing exposure time, and also by summing fewer exposures.
In the preferred
embodiment, substantially all transmitter power is put into very brief
flashes, with a repetition rate that still
allows an adequate system response time.
For example, a flash rate of 1 per second will satisfy the response time
requirement, and a flash duration
of less than lus and an exposure time of 2 us could (in principle) be used. In
practice this would be very
difficult to synchronise. In addition, the transmitter LEDs would need to
handle a very high peak current to
deliver the energy in such a short time, which in turn would increase cost.
Another limitation is the
dynamic range of the sensor. Putting all the power into one flash per second
could result in saturation in
the sensor.
In consideration of the above factors the preferred embodiment uses an
exposure of 100us, a flash
duration of 50ps, and a period of 9000ms. An integration length of 3 samples
is used for rate of change
based fault detection. An integration length of 30 samples is used for smoke
measurements.
To perform the background cancellation techniques, the receiver also needs to
capture images just
before and just after the flash that are used to eliminate the contribution
from the scene. Ideally these "off'
exposures would occur as close to the "on" exposure as possible to optimise
cancellation in the case of a
time varying background. With the receiver system used in the preferred
implementation, the maximum
practical frame rate is 1000fps, so the "off" exposures are spaced lms either
side of the "on" exposure.
In one form, the transmitter optical output consists of a series of short
pulses, with a very low duty cycle.
The pulses are placed to match the frame rate of the imaging system (e.g.
1000fps). Figure 92 shows an
exemplary pulse sequence in relation to the sensor exposures in the receiver.
In this case the transmitter
is adapted to emit light in an IR wavelength band and an fly wavelength band.
This series of pulses is
repeated with a period of 9000ms.
=
In the example, there are 5 pulses, as follows:
= Sync 1 (frame 1) 110 and Sync 2 (frame 2) 112: .Sync pulses are used to
maintain
synchronisation (discussed more fully later) between the transmitter and
receiver. These are
pulses are preferably made in the wavelength band which is most power
efficient. In this case the
IR light source is used because it results in lower power consumption.
Moreover the longer
wavelength is more able to penetrate smoke, so synchronisation can be
maintained in a greater
range of conditions. The Sync pulses are 50ps long.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
94
Ideally each synch pulse is centred in time on the leading (sync 1) and
trailing edges (sync 2) of
the receiver's shutter open period. This makes their received intensity vary
with small
=
synchronisation errors.
= IR (frame 5) 114 and UV (frame 7) 116. The IR and UV pulses are used for
signal level
measurement (and in turn used to measure attenuation and smoke level.). They
are 5046 long,
which allows for up to 25us timing error between transmitter and receiver
without influencing the
received intensity.
=
= Data (frame 9) 118: The data pulse is used to transfer a small amount of
data to the receiver.
The data is encoded by a either transmitting or not transmitting the data
pulse. The data pulse
has reduced amplitude to save power, and is IR for the same reason. They are
501,4s long. This
system provides a 3bps data channel. The data may include serial number, date
of manufacture,
total running time, battery status and fault conditions. Those skilled in the
art would be aware of
many alternative ways to send data in this system. These could include pulse
position encoding,
pulse width encoding, and multi level encoding schemes. Greater data rates
could readily be
achieved, however the simple scheme used in the preferred implementation is
sufficient for the
small amount of data needed.
In Figure 92, the data from the receiver during "off" frames (i.e. frames with
no corresponding transmitter
output) are used for the following purposes:
= Frame 0 & 3 are used for background cancellation of the sync pulses
=
= Frame 4 & 6 are used for background cancellation of the IR pulse
= Frame 6 & 8 are used for background cancellation of the UV pulse
= Frame 8 & 10 are used for background cancellation of the Data pulse
(a) Spatial Search
As described above, the receiver receives each of the transmitted pulses in
the form of one or more
pixels within an image frame.
However, during commissioning when the system commences operation (at least
the first time) the
locations of the transmitter(s) within the image frame must be established.
This could be performed for
example, by a manual process involving an operator inspecting the image, and
programming in the co-

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
ordinates. However, the need for special training, special tools, and long
complex installation processes
for installation is undesirable. In the preferred embodiment determining the
location of the transmitters
within the image frame is automated. The preformed process for locating
transmitters operates as follows:
= The system first captures a number of images at a high frame rate and for
a time sufficient to
5 ensure that transmitter pulses, if the transmitter is within the field of
view of the camera and
pulses are transmitted during the period of capture, will be present in one or
more images.
= The system then subtracts each pair of (temporally) adjacent images, and
takes the modulus of
each pixel and then tests each against a threshold to detect locations of
large variation, at which
a transmitter may be present.
10 = The system then condenses the candidate list of transmitter
locations by merging candidate
points that are adjacent or nearby. (e.g. <3 pixels apart) A centre of gravity
method can be used
to find the centre of a set of candidate points.
= The system then performs a trial synchronisation (using the process
described below) at each of
the candidate centres to verify that the received value at a candidate centre
corresponds to a real
15 transmitter.
= The system then checks that the number of transmitters matches the
expected number of
transmitters. This number may be set by pre-programming the receiver prior to
installation, or by
a switch or switches mounted on, in, or connected to the receiver unit. In the
preferred
implementation, there is a set of configuration DIP Switches incorporated into
the receiver unit
20 and easily accessible only while the system is not mounted to the wall.
The set of transmitter locations within the image is stored in non-volatile
memory. The locations can be
cleared by placing the .receiver into a particular mode, e.g. by setting the
DIP switches to a particular
setting and powering / de-powering the receiver, or by the use of a special
tool, such as a notebook PC.
This is only required if a transmitter is moved from its original location or
the system is to be re-installed
25 elsewhere.
Performance limitations in the imaging system may limit the number of pixels
or lines that can be read out
when operating at a high frame rate. In one implementation, a maximum of 30
lines of 640 pixels can be
read out in lms. Therefore the first few steps of the above method need to be
repeated 16 times to cover
the entire 640*480 image frame. Alternatively, some embodiments employ only
part of the image frame.
30 Similarly, some embodiments use a slower frame rate. However, the
possibility of sensor saturation in

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
96
bright lighting conditions generally limits exposure time, and variations in
background lighting conditions
generally introduce more noise if a lower frame rate is used.
The frame rate must be chosen to ensure that the transmitter pulses do not
always occur in period where
the shutter is closed. For example, if the frame rate is exactly 1000fps, with
an exposure of 100us, and
the transmitter produces pulses on exact 1 ms boundaries, the pulses may all
be generated at times when
the shutter is closed. The receiver frame rate is chosen so that there is a
slight difference causing a
gradual phase shift, ensuring that sooner or later the pulses will fall
sufficiently within a shutter open
period.
In some embodiments, processing speed limitations are managed by not analysing
all of the pixels,
instead only every nth (eg. 4th) horizontal and vertical pixel are subtracted
and checked, reducing
processing effort (eg. by a factor of 16). Provided that the received image
i.e. the image of each
transmitter on the sensor, is spread over a sufficiently larger area (e.g. a
spot having a diameter of 5
pixels), then the transmitter will still be found reliably.
Whenever the system is powered up, either with a known set of transmitter
locations or as a part of the
Spatial Search described above, with a set of candidate locations, a phase
search and lock method is
used to establish initial synchronisation.
The major steps of this method are:
The system captures images at a high frame rate (at least a partial image in
the expected location).
The system waits for the expected pattern of pulses to appear at the candidate
centre locations.
The system uses the time of arrival of a selected pulse within the expected
pattern as a starting phase for
the phase locked loop.
The system waits for stabilisation of the PLL. If no PLL lock is made, then in
the case of testing candidate
locations, the location is marked as spurious, otherwise when re-establishing
synchronisation with a
known transmitter location the receiver can re-try continually and assert a
fault until it is successful.
As with the spatial search, a small offset in the receiver frame rate is used
to cause a gradual phase shift,
ensuring that sooner or later the pulses will fall sufficiently within a
shutter open period.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
97
For each frame, the total intensity is calculated within a small region of the
image centred on the known or
candidate location. This sequence of intensity values is then checked for the
expected pattern from the
transmitter.
The test for the expected pattern operates as follows:
After at least 9 frame intensity values have been collected, they can be
tested for the presence of the
expected transmitter pulse sequence in the following manner.
Given the intensity values I(n), 0 < 17 < N ,
Test for a possible transmitter signal starting with its frame 0 at frame n
received
First, compute an "off frame" reference level
/0= (/õ(// + 0) + I ,(n + 3) + I õ(n + 4) + I õ(n + 6) + I õ(n + 8))/5
{mean of "off frames")
Compute relative intensities
/õ(/ + n =- I + ¨ I õ for 111 = 0 to
Compare with pre - determined thresholds to determine the presence or
absence of a tranmitter pulse in each frame
Found = {(4 + ,1) > I (m)or õ(n + 2) > /0, )} and {Sync 1 or Sync 2 pulse)
+5) /0, ) and {IR pulse)
( I õ(n + 7)> 'ON) and {UV pulse)
(Iõ (n+ 0) < /0õ. ) and {off frame
( õ(n + 3) < ) and {off frame}
(Iõ(n+ 4) < ) and {off frame
( õ(n + 6) < IT) and {off frame)
õ(n +8) < /01õ. ) and {off frame}
Due to the random phase errors, either of the sync pulses may be completely
missing, hence the "or" in
the above expression. Alternatively, the tests for the sync pulses can be
omitted entirely, and the tests for
1 0 the off frames can also be reduced. However, care must be taken to
ensure that the position of the
transmitter pulse sequence is not falsely identified.
Following a positive detection, the time corresponding to the frame n is
recorded in a variable. The
amplitudes of the phase pulses can be used to trim the recorded time value to
more closely represent the

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
98
start of the sequence. This helps reduce the initial phase error that the
phased locked loop has to deal
with, and may not be required if frequency errors are sufficiently small.
In the preferred implementation the image capture rate 1000 fps which matches
the transmitter timing as
previously described. A shutter time of 100ps is used.
This completes the initial synchronisation. The arrival time of the next set
of pulses can now be predicted
by simply adding the known transmitter period to the time recorded in the
previous step.
Although the transmitter period is known to the receiver (300ms in the
preferred implementation), there
will be small errors in the clock frequencies at each end. This will
inevitably cause the transmitted pulses
to become misaligned with the receiver shutter open time. A Phase Locked Loop
system is used to
maintain the correct phase or timing. The PLL concept is well known so will
not be described in detail. In
the preferred implementation the PLL control equations are implemented in
software. The Phase
Comparator function is based on measuring the amplitude of the phase pulses.
These amplitude are
calculated by subtracting the mean of the intensities measured in the nearest
off frames (frames 0 & 3).
The phase error is then computed with the following formula:
iõ (1)¨ iõ (2)
=
c , õ õ T
2Võ (1) + /õ (2)) where T is the width of the phase pulses.
In the case that the phase pulse amplitudes fall below a pre-determined
threshold, the phase error is
assigned a value of zero. This way noisy data is permitted into the PLL, and
in practice the system is able
to maintain adequate synchronisation for at least a few minutes. Therefore,
high smoke levels do not
cause a synchronisation failure before an alarm can be signalled. In the case
of an obstruction, this
feature allows the system to recover rapidly when the blockage is removed.
The PLL control equations include proportional and integral terms. It was not
found necessary to use a
differential term. In the preferred implementation proportional gain and
integrator gains of 0.3 and 0.01
respectively were found to produce acceptable results. In a further variation,
the gains can be set to larger
values initially, and reduced after the phase error is below a pre-determined
threshold, thus reducing
overall lock time for a given loop bandwidth.
Phase error below +/-10 s can be used to indicate phase lock, both for the
purpose of verifying a
candidate transmitter location and also for allowing normal smoke detection
operation to commence.
=

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
99
Figure 93 illustrates an environmental monitoring system 9300 adapted to
monitor a region 9302 within a
room 9304. The environmental monitoring system includes a beam detection
subsystem 9306 which
includes a receiver 9308 and four transmitters 9310, 9312, 9314, 9316. The
beam detection subsystem
operates in accordance with an embodiment of any one of the systems described
above.
The environmental monitoring system 9300 additionally includes four additional
environmental monitors
9318, 9320, 9322, 9324. Each of the additional environmental monitors 9318 to
9324 may be of the same
type but alternatively each may be of a different type i.e. sense a different
environmental condition or the
same condition by a different mechanism. The environmental monitors can
include, for example, carbon
dioxide, carbon monoxide, temperature, flame, other gas sensors or the like.
Each of the additional
environmental monitors 9318 to 9324 is connected by a communications channel.
to a nearby transmitter
of the beam detection subsystem. For example, the additional environmental
monitor 9318 is connected
via wire 9326 to corresponding transmitter 9310 of the beam detection
subsystem 9306. Similarly,
environmental monitor 9320 is in data communication with transmitter 9312,
environmental monitor 9322
is data communication with transmitter 9314 and the environmental monitor 9324
is in data
communication with transmitter 9316. The data communications channel between
each environmental
monitor and its respective transmitter may be hard wired connection or may be
via a wireless connection
e.g. radio, optical etc. communications link. In most embodiments the
communications link need only be
unidirectional, however it may in some embodiments be bidirectional. In the
unidirectional case, the
communications channel is adapted such that the environmental monitor can
communicate an alarm
and/or fault condition detected by it, or other output, e.g. a raw or
processed sensor output to the
transmitter of the beam detection subsystem 9606.
=
As will be appreciated the environmental sensors can be housed within the
transmitters rather than
located remotely and connected by a long wire or communications link.
The transmitter of the beam detection subsystem 9306 is adapted to receive
signals from the
environmental monitor and re-transmit these, with or without additional
encoding, via an optical
communications channel, back to the receiver 9308. The optical communications
channel may be
implemented by modulating either the particle detection beam or a secondary
beam transmitted by the
transmitter to the receiver 9308. The communications channel can be
alternately or intermittently
transmitted between pulses of the particle detection beam generated by the
transmitter. Alternatively, it
may be continuously illuminated, possibly simultaneously with a particle
detection beam. In this case, the
wavelength used for the particle detection beam or beams can be different to
that on which the optical
communications channel is implemented.
Using such a system, a network of environmental monitors may be placed around
the region being
monitored 9302, and the environmental conditions sensed by these monitors can
be communicated back
to the receiver of the beam detection subsystem. The receiver 9308 is in data
communication with a fire

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
100
alarm control panel e.g. via a fire alarm loop or proprietary network or other
notification system without
the need for complicated dedicated wiring system between the environmental
monitor network and the
fire alarm system. In a preferred embodiment, a plurality of optical
communications channels can be
differently encoded such that a receiver of the beam detection subsystem can
distinguish each optical
communications channel from each other. For example, each optical
communications channel may be
modulated differently or may be scheduled to operate in a different time
period. Thus effectively a time
division multiplexing arrangement can be implemented for the different optical
communications channels.
Using different wavelengths for each communications channel may also be
possible.
The system also enables the location at which an environmental condition is
detected to be determined
since the receiver 9308 can resolve optical channels from the different
transmitters e.g. based on the
signal received or where on the sensor the signal arrives if the receiver's
sensor is of a multi-sensor
element type. The addressing information or channel information can be passed
to the fire alarm control
panel and the location of the alert be passed to an operator or fire
authority.
In the example of figure 93 each of the transmitters and environmental
monitors are preferably battery
powered to remove any need for wiring.
Figure 94 illustrates a further embodiment of this aspect of the present
invention. In this embodiment, the
environmental monitoring system 9400 includes a beam detection subsystem 9402
as well as an
environmental monitoring subsystem 9404. The beam detection subsystem includes
a receiver 9406 and
a transmitter 9408. The transmitter is adapted to emit one or more beams of
light 9410 which are
received by the receiver 9406. The receiver 9406 has a wide field of view
having edges indicated by lines
9409, 9409B. Within the field of view of the receiver 9406 there are
positioned two environmental
monitors 9412, 9414. Environmental monitors 9412 and 9414 may be of any of the
types described
above, and additionally include a respective light emitter 9416, 9418. The
light emitters 9416, 9418 may
be a low power LED or the like and are used to generate an optical signal
which is received by the
receiver 9406. Each of the LEDs 9416, 9418 can be individually modulated to
communicate an output of
the corresponding environmental monitors 9412, 9414 back to the receiver 9406.
As described in the
previous embodiment, the optical communications channels can be either time
multiplexed or wavelength
multiplexed with each other and with the particle detection beam or beams 9410
emitted by the
transmitter 9408. This embodiment has the additional advantage over that of
figure 93 that there is no
need for any wiring or communications channel between the environmental
monitors 9412 and 9414 and
the particle detection subsystem transmitter 9408. Accordingly installation
costs are minimised.
Figure 95 illustrates a component of a particle detector system. The component
9500 is a light source
which is used to emit one or more beams of light across a volume being
monitored for particles. The light
source 9500 includes one or more light emitters 9502 which are connected to
circuitry 9504 which deliver
power to the light emitters 9502. The operation of the light emitter 9502 is
controlled by a microcontroller

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
101
9506 which causes the light emitters to be illuminated in a predetermined
fashion, e.g. to flash in a
particular sequence. The light source 9500 is powered by a battery 9508. The
output of the battery is
monitored by monitoring component 9510 and the environmental conditions in
which the component is
operating are monitored by the environmental monitor 9512. The environmental
monitor 9512 can be a
temperature sensing device such as a thermocouple. The controller 9506
receives the output of the
battery monitor 9510 and the output of the environmental sensor 9512 and
determines an expected
battery life.
More particularly, the, controller receives signal representing the
temperature of the immediate
surroundings of the battery and the measured output voltage of the battery
9508. The battery output
voltage is compared to a threshold voltage corresponding to the measured
temperature and the
discharge state of the battery 9508 is determined.
In an alternative embodiment, the battery monitor 9510 is adapted to measure
the total current drawn
from the battery. For example, the monitor 9510 can be an ammeter and
determine the level of current
being drawn from the battery. In this case, the controller is adapted to
integrate the measured current
over time and the rernaining available charge is determined. When the
remaining charge available is
calculated to fall below the predetermined threshold an indication can be
generated of the impending
discharged state of the battery.
In a further alternative, an estimate of the total current used can be made.
For example, in a preferred
embodiment the majority of the charge drawn from the battery will be drawn in
pulses which are used for
flashing the light emitters 9502. If the circuitry 9504 operates at a constant
current, which is preferred, the
duration of operation of the LED multiplied by this constant current will
provide a relatively accurate
measurement of the total charge used by the system over time. In a cruder
alternative the typical average
current consumption known to be required by the equipment can be pre-
calculated and the length of time
of operation of the component can be used to determine the total current drawn
from the battery over
time.
In the above embodiments, the environmental conditions, most advantageously
the temperature of the
immediate surroundings of the battery can be monitored over time and this
temperature data can be used
by the controller to produce a more accurate estimate of the remaining charge
available in the battery
9808. As will be appreciated the controller can be adapted to calculate an
estimate of the remaining
battery life available under the prevailing conditions. The remaining time can
be compared to a warning
threshold and if the threshold is exceeded an indication of an approaching
discharged state can be
generated.
In a preferred embodiment the predetermined time threshold at which an
indication of an approaching
discharged state of the battery will be generated, may be selected in order to
allow maintenance

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
102
personnel to receive an indication of the impending discharge of the battery
during a scheduled
maintenance event. If the warning of the impending discharge of the battery
can be given at a sufficiently
early stage, say before the scheduled maintenance event prior to another
scheduled maintenance event
at which the battery will need to be changed then no extra unscheduled
maintenance event will be
required. Moreover, the maintenance personnel can ensure that the required
equipment e.g. specialised
tools and a battery is. obtained prior to the maintenance event at which the
battery will need to be
changed. For example, where a component has a nominal battery life of 5 years
and an annual
maintenance inspection is scheduled, an indication of impending battery
failure can be raised say 13 or
14 months before the nominal end of life. In this way at the inspection
arising about 4 years after
commissioning of the system the maintenance personnel will detect that the
battery will need to be
changed at the following maintenance session (in a year's time) and can plan
to bring a replacement
battery on the next annual visit. It should be understood that to avoid
failure of the system the nominal
battery life is set with a significant safety margin. The time of 13 or 14
months is chosen to allow a
scheduling margin for the two maintenance sessions i.e. the one at which the
maintenance personnel
learns of the battery discharge state, and the next one at which it will be
changed.
In a preferred form of the present invention, when the component being
monitored is a light source of the
particle detector, the light source controller can be adapted to signal the
battery state to the receiver. This
can be done by modulating the amplitude, duration and/or timing of one or more
transmitted light pulses
in a predetermined fashion. The light pulse used for data transmission can be
one of the light pulses used
in particle detection or an additional light pulse added to the sequence of
light pulses produced by the
light source for the purposes of data communication from the light source to
the receiver. As described
above, such a scheme avoids the need for wiring between the units.
Alternatively, the light source may be
fitted with additional low powered LED which can be flashed to indicate to a
person (rather than the
receiver) located remotely from it, the state of its battery.
In a particularly sophisticated embodiment, the controller of the light source
can be adapted to generate a
battery output signal e.g. by modulating a light beam in a particular code,
with which indicates a time until
expected a battery discharge. For example, the output signal can indicate the
number of months until the
battery is expected to be flat. This allows the maintenance personnel to more
accurately schedule the
next scheduled maintenance session, and also determine if the battery will
need to be replaced before
the next scheduled visit. Moreover if an accurate 'time to full discharge' is
known then the light source can
go into a low power mode e.g. in which its duty cycle is reduced from normal
to extend battery life. The
receiver can be programmed to detect this low duty cycle mode and indicate a
fault if a low duty cycle
modulation patterns is observed.
=
Figure 96 illustrates a system according to a further embodiment of the
present invention. In this system
9600 there is provided a first receiver 9602 which is associated with a pair
of transmitters 9604 and 9608.
The first transmitter 9604 transmits a first beam of light 9606, and the
second transmitter 9608 transmits

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
103
corresponding beam of light 9610. Both beams of light are received by the
receiver 9602 and particle
detection decisions can be made in accordance with embodiments of the
invention described herein. The
system 9600 additionally includes a receiver 9612 and associated transmitter
9614 which transmits a
beam of light 9616. The beam 9616 is received by the receiver 9612 which can
be adapted to determine
the presence of particles as described elsewhere herein. The beam detector
arrangement effectively
provides three beam detectors that have beams that are coincident (or
practically coincident) at two
places. Both of the receivers 9602 and 9612 are connected to a controller 9618
which is adapted to apply
fault and/or alarm logic to determine that the fault conditions and/or
particle detection conditions exist. As
will be appreciated, the intersecting beams 9606 and 9616, and 9610 and 9616
enable the system 9600
to determine whether particles have been detected at the points of
intersection of the beams by
correlations the outputs from the receivers 9602 and 9612. Such an arrangement
also enables relatively
advanced processing to be implemented and enables the particle detection
algorithms of each of the
individual beam detectors to differ from that used in a single stand alone
beam detector. For example, a
simple double knock system can be implemented in which at least two of the
beams must detect particles
above a predetermined threshold level before an alarm is raised. In a
preferred form such a system may
reduce overall false alarm rates as a false alarm condition is unlikely to
occur in two different beams.
However, this also permits a lower alarm threshold to be used, thus enabling
faster detection of particles,
without substantially affecting the false alarm rate of the system. In such a
system, the false alarm
probability of the entire system is the same as the product of the individual
false alarm probabilities of the
beams. As will be appreciated, both of the advantages of the above systems can
be obtained to some
extent by setting an alarm threshold which compromises between sensitivity and
false alarm rate
improvement. Moreover, temporal characteristics of the particle detection
outputs of the various beam
detectors can be used to improve particle detection performance or reduce
false alarm occurrences. In
this regard, the time separation between occurrences of suspected smoke events
in each of the beams
can be used to improve probability of early detection without increasing false
alarm. For example, the
time which each of a pair of substantially coincident beams goes into alarm,
can be used to determine
whether the alarm condition is caused by the presence of particles or a false
alarm. If they are
substantially coincident in time then the particle detection event is likely
to be genuine. On the other hand,
if the particle detection event occurs at substantially different times in
each of the beams then this is likely
to indicate a false alarm is present. In sophisticated systems it may be
possible to compare time varying
particle detection profiles from each of the beam detectors to identify
corresponding particle detection
events. For example, this could be done by cross correlating the outputs of a
plurality of substantially
coincident beam detectors within the system. In the event that high cross
correlation between a pair of
outputs is determined this can indicate that the output of each of the beam
detectors are both
experiencing similar conditions e.g. the same particle detection event or same
false alarm event. A
determination as to which type of event it is could be made by analysing the
profiles e.g. a duration of
obscuration; a level of obscuration; rate of change at the outset of
observation etc to determine if the
event is caused by the presence of particles or a foreign body.

CA 02760026 2016-08-05
104
It will be understood that the invention disclosed and defined in this
specification extends to all alternative
combinations of two or more of the individual features mentioned or evident
from the text or drawings. All
of these different combinations constitute various alternative aspects of the
invention.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2018-03-20
(86) PCT Filing Date 2010-05-03
(87) PCT Publication Date 2010-11-04
(85) National Entry 2011-10-25
Examination Requested 2015-04-23
(45) Issued 2018-03-20

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $263.14 was received on 2023-04-19


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if small entity fee 2024-05-03 $125.00
Next Payment if standard fee 2024-05-03 $347.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2011-10-25
Application Fee $400.00 2011-10-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2012-05-03 $100.00 2011-10-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2013-05-03 $100.00 2013-04-02
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2013-12-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2014-05-05 $100.00 2014-04-03
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2015-05-04 $200.00 2015-04-02
Request for Examination $800.00 2015-04-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2016-05-03 $200.00 2016-04-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2017-05-03 $200.00 2017-04-03
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2017-09-13
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2017-09-14
Final Fee $636.00 2018-01-31
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2018-05-03 $200.00 2018-04-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2019-05-03 $200.00 2019-04-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2020-05-04 $250.00 2020-04-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2021-05-03 $255.00 2021-04-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2022-05-03 $254.49 2022-04-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2023-05-03 $263.14 2023-04-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GARRETT THERMAL SYSTEMS LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2011-10-25 1 68
Claims 2011-10-25 31 1,139
Drawings 2011-10-25 50 651
Description 2011-10-25 104 5,705
Representative Drawing 2012-01-11 1 5
Cover Page 2012-01-11 1 41
Claims 2015-04-23 3 102
Drawings 2016-08-05 50 664
Description 2016-08-05 104 5,456
Final Fee 2018-01-31 1 54
Representative Drawing 2018-02-19 1 5
Cover Page 2018-02-19 1 40
PCT 2011-10-25 24 1,363
Assignment 2011-10-25 7 257
Examiner Requisition 2016-10-31 5 222
Assignment 2013-12-17 30 6,992
Correspondence 2016-02-03 10 793
Prosecution-Amendment 2015-04-23 5 166
Prosecution-Amendment 2015-04-23 2 64
Examiner Requisition 2016-02-08 6 341
Amendment 2016-08-05 221 11,229
Amendment 2017-03-31 8 294
Claims 2017-03-31 2 61