Language selection

Search

Patent 1050750 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1050750
(21) Application Number: 1050750
(54) English Title: CROSS-COUNTRY TYPE SKI BOOTS
(54) French Title: BOTTINE DE SKI DE FOND
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A cross-country type ski boot which comprises a boot
upper for receiving a foot therein and being attached to a sole.
The sole has at least a front edge extending beyond a toe
portion of the boot upper to define a front ledge portion. The
boot upper has a reinforcing fabric piece secured on the toe
portion and having a securable free end which extends beyond a
lower end of the toe portion. The securable free end is secured
to the front ledge portion forwardly of the toe portion.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive
property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:-
1. A cross-country type ski boot comprising a boot upper
for receiving a foot therein, said boot upper being attached
to a sole, said sole having at least a front edge extending
beyond a toe portion of said boot upper to define a front ledge
portion, said boot upper having a reinforcing fabric piece
secured on said toe portion and having a securable free end
extending beyond a lower edge of said toe portion, said secur-
able free end being secured to said front ledge portion forwardly
of said toe portion, said front ledge portion being provided
with a horizontal slot in at least a portion thereof aligned
with said securable free end to receive and secure said secur-
able free end therein, said sole being provided with a boot
upper cavity in a top surface thereof, said cavity having a
flat base, an elevated peripheral ledge defined about said
cavity, and said horizontal slot being constituted by slitting
said front ledge portion from a front edge thereof to said
cavity and in horizontal alignment with an upper surface of
said flat base.
2. A ski boot as claimed in claim 1 wherein said toe
portion is formed of an inner fabric layer having a lower edge
thereof inwardly turned and secured on a peripheral marginal
edge of said flat base, an outer fabric piece secured over a
section of said toe portion, said reinforcing fabric piece
being secured between said inner fabric layer and said outer
fabric piece.

3. A ski boot as claimed in Claim 2 wherein said
outer fabric piece is of Y-shape configuration defining a
main body section, two diverging end arms and an opening
between said arms, said diverging end arms having an
attachable free end, each attachable free end being inwardly
turned and secured under said inner fabric layer lower edge
on said peripheral marginal edge of said flat base.
4. A ski boot as claimed in claim 3 wherein said
reinforcing fabric piece is an elongated strip of reinforcing
material, said strip being fastened centrally on said toe
portion in alignment with the central longitudinal axis
of said boot, said strip extending between said two diver-
ging end arms through said opening between said arms.
5. A ski boot as claimed in Claim 4 wherein said re-
inforcing fabric piece is a nylon strip stitched between
said inner fabric layer and said outer fabric piece.
6. A ski boot as claimed in Claim 4 wherein said
opening between said two diverging arms is positioned in a
front portion of said toe portion above said front ledge
of said sole.
7. A ski boot as claimed in Claim 3 wherein said
securable free end of said reinforcing fabric piece is glued
in said horizontal slot.
8. A ski boot as claimed in Claim 7 wherein said
slitted front ledge portion is glued together with said
securable free end in said slot, and fastener elements
extending transversely in said front ledge portion and ex-
tending through said securable free end of said reinforcing
fabric piece.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~L~507S6~
The present invention relates to an improved cross-
country type ski boot construction wherein the toe portion of
the boot is reinforced to prevent the boot upper from detaching
itself from the sole in the front toe portion of the boot.
Various ski boot constructions are known. This in-
vention relates to a specific type of ski boot known as a cross-
country ski boot. This type of ski boot is normally attached
to a ski harness in the toe portion of the boot, only. Con-
ventional types of cro,ss-country ski boot harnesses comprise
pins protruding into the bottom face of the sole in the front
portion thereof with a clamp, spring biased downwardly, on a front
ledge portion of the sole. The front portion of the sole is
secured to the ski to permit the wearer to pivot its foot on ;
the toe portion thereof as he strides on the snow with the skis.
r~hus, the secured front portion of the boot acts as a pivot and
the rear portion of the boot lifts from the top of the ski during
every stride of the skier.
This pivotal action of the ski boot causes the front
toe portion of the boot upper to detach itself from the sole
portion as the front portion of the sole is rigidly secured to
the ski and the wearer's foot e~erts an outward pressure on
the fabric of the boot upper causing it to detach itself in
the front portion thereof.
It is a feature of the present invention to overcome
the above mentioned disadvantage whereby to prevent the front ~-
portion of the boot upper from detaching itself from the sole
of the boot.
It is a further feature of the present invention to
provide a cross-country type ski boot construction having a novel
front portion construction which is a substantial improvement
over prior art cross-country type ski boots.
According to the above features, frorn a broad aspect,

'.

~6~5~75~
the present invention provides a cross-country type ski boot com- - -
prising a boot upper for receiving a foot therein. The boot upper
is attached to a sole which has at least a front edge extending
beyond a toe portion of the boot upper to define a front ledge ;
portion. The boot upper has a reinforcing fabric piece secured
on the toe portion and having a securable free end extending
beyond a lower edge of the toe portion. The securable free end
is secured to the front ledge portion forwardly of the toe
portion, The front ledge portion is provided with a horizontal
slot in at least a portion thereof aligned with the securable
free end to receive and secure the securable free end therein.
The sole is provided w:Lth a boot upper cavity in a top sureace
thereof, with the cavity having a flat base. An elevatecl peri-
pheral ledge defined about the cavity. The horizontal slot is
constituted by sl tting the front ledge portion from a front
edge thereof to the cavity and in horizontal alignment with an
upper surface of the flat base.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention will
now be described with reference to an example as il]ustrated in
the accompanyincJ drawings in which:
FIGURE 1 is a fragmented side view of a cross-country
ski-boot upper constructed in accordance with the invention;
FIGURE 2 is a fragmented section view of the front ;~
portion of a cross-country ski boot of the prior art type,
FIGURE 3 is a view similar to Figure 2 but illustrat-
ing the attachrnent of the reinforcing fabric piece of the present
; invention,
FIGURE 4 is a fragmented plan view of a cross-country
; ski boot sole, and
FIGURE 5 is a fragmented top view of a cross-country
ski boot constructed in accordance with the present invention,
; A
.

~L~15~)7S6~
Referring now to the drawings, there is shown gen-
erally at 10 the cross-country type ski boot of the present
invention. The boot consists essentially of a boot upper 11
secured to a sole 12 of rubber or the like material. As is con-
ventional with ski boots, the sole has a front edge 13 extending
beyond a toe portion 14 of the boot upper 11 to define a front
ledge portion 15 for securement in a ski harness, not shown.
In the prior art, see Figure 2, the ~abric pieces
16 of the toe portion 1~ extend inwardly, as shown at 17, under
- 2a -
, .

--~ :
5q;175~
the boot upper 11 and are secured along a peripheral edge portion
of a cavity 18 provided in the upper face 19 of the sole 12
(see Figure 4). As shown in Figure 2, an inner sole 20 is
positioned inside the boot upper to provide a smooth inner
bottom surface. The inwardly turned edges are normally glued
to the peripheral marginal edge of the cavity 18. Stiches may
also be provided along the inwardly turned marginal edge. With
such prior art boot construction the front ledge portion 15 of
the sole is usually clamped down rigidly and immovably by a
cross-country ski harness (not shown) to provide pivotal move-
ment of the boot from the front clamped portion thereof. During
normal cross-country skiing motion, an ou-tward pressure is
exerted by the foot of the wearer on the top fabric portion of
the ski boot in the direction of arrow 21. I~his constant
motion and pressure causes the front portion 14 of the ski boot
to detach itself from the front marginal edge of the cavity 18
thus destroying the ski boot.
With the present invention, there is provided a re-
inforcing fabric piece 30 secured on the toe portion 14 and
having a securable free end 31 which extends beyond the lower
A edge ~ of the toe portion 14. The securable free end 31 is
secured to the front ledge portion 15 of the sole 12 in the
following manner.
As shown in Figure 4, the sole 12 is provided with a
boot upper cavity 18 which defines a flat base 22. The portion
of the sole about the cavity 18 constitutes an elevated peri-
pheral ledge 23 extending about the cavity. In order to attach
the securable free end 31 and the reinforcing fabric piece 30
to the front ledge portion 15, the front ledge portion 15 is
slit horizontally from a front edge 24 thereof and extending to
the cavity 18. This slit is clearly shown in Figure 3 and id-
entified by numeral 26. The extent of the slit is shown by the
. . . . .

~s~s~ :
dotted lines 25 in Figure 4.
Referring now more specifically to Figures 1 and 3,
it can be seen that the toe portion 14 of the boot 10 is
provided with an inner fabric layer 33 having a lower edge
thereof inwardly turned and secured along the peripheral marginal
edge of the base of the cavity 18, by suitable fastening
means such as glue or stitches. An outer fabric piece 35 is
also secured over a section of the toe portion 14 with the re-
inforcement fabric piece 30 being positioned and secured between
the inner fabric layer 33 and the outer fabric layer 35 by
stitches 41 (see Figure 5). The securable free end 31 o the
reinforcing fabric 30 is positioned in the slot 26 and the slitted
portion of the front edge is then glued back together over the
securable free end 31. Fastener elements 43 (see Figure 5) may
be inserted in the front ledge portion 15 and extend at least
through the securable free end 31 of the reinforcing fabric
piece 30 to provide additional retention.
As seen in Figure 5, the outer fabric piece 35 is
of Y-shape configuration defining a main body section 36,
two diverging end arms 37 and an opening 38 between said arms
37. Each diverging end arms has an attachable free end 39
which is also inwardly turned and secured in the margina:L
edge of the cavity 18 under the lower edge of the fabric
layer 33. As herein shown the reinforcing fabric piece 30 is
an elongated strip of reinforcing nylon material which is
rubber covered. The reinforcing strip 30 is secured centrally
on the toe portion 14 in alignment with the central longitu-
dinal axis 40 of the boot 10. The strip 30 also extends between
the two diverging end arms 37 and is visible from the outside
of the boot in the opening 38 between the arms 37.
It can be seen that with this type of construction of
the toe portion 14 of the ski boot, the clamping pressure applied
:;
~ - 4 -

1~5~75al
on the front ledge portion 15 of the boot maintains the
securable free end 31 of the reinforcing piece 30 in clamping
pressure. Thus, as the boot pivots on the toe portion thereof,
the stress is applied on the reinforcing piece 30 and it maintains ~:
the front portion construction of the boot in solid attachment
with the sole 12. With this type of construction the above
noted defects of the prior art cross-country ski boots has been
overcome.
Pull test experiments have been made with conven-
tional cross-country type ski boots to determine the force
require~ to pull apart the front portion of the s~i boot upper
Erom the sole portion and with conventional ski boots it has
been found that when a boot comes apart with a pull force oE
100 to 125 pounds, the boot is considered acceptable. However, .
with a cross-country ski boot constructed in accordance with the ~ -
present invention, the maximum pull force of 255 pounds of the test
machine was applied to the front portion of the ski boot and
no separation was apparent.
It is within the ambit of the present invention to . .
cover any obvious modifications of the embodiment thereof
described, provided such modifications fall within the monopoly
defined by the appended claims.
.:

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1050750 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1996-03-20
Grant by Issuance 1979-03-20

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
None
Past Owners on Record
CLAUDE E. VILLENEUVE
NORMAND A. BERGERON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1994-04-18 1 19
Abstract 1994-04-18 1 16
Claims 1994-04-18 2 77
Drawings 1994-04-18 1 40
Descriptions 1994-04-18 6 226