Language selection

Search

Patent 1051711 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1051711
(21) Application Number: 1051711
(54) English Title: STABILIZED ICE CREAM
(54) French Title: AGENT STABILISATEUR DE CREME GLACEE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A stabilizer system has been developed that is
particularly useful in ice cream requiring more than usual
stabilization. The system comprises microcrystalline
cellulose with one or more of carboxymethyl cellulose and a
galactomannan gam. A preferred system consists of micro-
crystalline cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose and locust
bean gum or tara gum.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY
OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. An ice cream containing a stabilising system characterised
in that the stabiliser system comprises micro-crystalline cellu-
lose and one or more of carboxymethyl cellulose and galactomannan
gums, when no galactomannan gum is present, the weight ratio of
micro-crystalline cellulose to carboxymethyl cellulose being not
more than 3:1.
2. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
the amount of micro-crystalline cellulose is at least 0.01% weight
of the ice cream.
3. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 2 characterised in that
the amount of micro crystalline cellulose is at least 0.1% by
weight.
4. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 3 characterised in that
the amount of micro-crystalline cellulose is not more than 0.8%
by weight.
5. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 4 characterised in that
the amount of micro-crystalline cellulose is not more than 0.4%
by weight.
6. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 5 characterised in that
the amount of micro-crystalline cellulose is in the range 0.15%
to 0.4% by weight.
7. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 6 characterised in that
the range is 0.15% to 0.25%.
8. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
the amount of total carboxymethyl cellulose (calculated as sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose) and galactomannan gums is not more than
1% by weight of the ice cream.
9. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 8 characterised in that
the amount of total carboxymethyl cellulose and galactomannan
18

gums is not more than 0.5%.
10. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 9 characterised in that
the amount of total carboxymethyl cellulose and galactomannan
gums is in the range of 0.15% to 0.35%.
11. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
the amount of galactomannan gums is not less than 0.01%.
12. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
the amount of galactomannan gums is not less than 0.05%.
13. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
the weight ratio of micro-crystalline cellulose to total
carboxymethyl cellulose (calculated as sodium carboxymethyl
cellulose) and galactomannan gums is in the range 4:1 to 1:4.
14. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 13 characterised in that
the range is 2:1 to 1:3.
15. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
the amount of the stabiliser system is in the range 0.15 to 1.0%.
16. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 15 characterised in that the
range is 0.3 to 0.5%.
17. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
the weight ratio of micro crystalline cellulose to carboxymethyl
cellulose is not more than 3:1.
18. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 17 characterised in that
the weight ratio is in the range 3:1 to 1:2.
19. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
it has a log C as herein defined of less than 2.8 at -20° C.
20. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 19 characterised in that
the log C is less than 2.5 at -20° C.
21. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
it has a log C at -20°C as herein defined of not below 2.3.
19

22. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
it is notionally obtainable by replacing water and sugar in the
formulation of a conventional ice cream by a freezing-point
depressant.
23. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 22 characterised in that
it is notionally obtainable by use of sufficient freezing-point
depressant to depress the log C at -20° C by between 0.25 and 1.
24. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 23 characterised in that
the log C at -20° C is depressed by 0.4 and 0.75.
25. An ice cream as claimed in claim 22 characterised in that
the notional conventional ice cream has a log C at -20° C in the
range 2.9 to 3.7.
26. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 25 characterised in that
the log C is in the range 3.3 to 3.7.
27. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 25 characterised in that
the range is 2.9 to 3.3.
28. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
it contains glycerol or sorbitol as the freezing-point
depressant.
290 An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
it has a melt-down as herein defined of less than 25 ml/hr at
15° C.
30. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 29 characterised in that
the melt-down is between 5 and 20 ml/hr at 15° C.
31. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that
the stabiliser system contains a galactomannan gum.
32. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 31 characterised in that
the galactomannan gum is locust bean gum or tara gum.
33. An ice cream as claimed in any one of Claims 31-32
characterised in that the stabiliser system contains carboxy-
methyl cellulose.

34. An ice cream claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that the
ice cream has a PH in the range 3.0 to 5.2 and sufficiently
below the isoelectric point of any acid precipitatable protein
present in substantial amount that the protein is substantially
uncoagulated.
35. An ice cream claimed in Claim 34 characterised in that
the protein is whey protein.
36. An ice cream as claimed in Claim 35 characterised in that
the whey protein has been purified by reverse osmosis.
37. A stabiliser system containing micro-crystalline cellulose
and carboxymethyl cellulose characterised in that it contains
a galactomannan gum.
38. A stabiliser system as claimed in Claim 37 characterised
in that the galactomannan gum is locust bean gum.
39. A stabiliser system as claimed in Claim 37 characterised
in that the galactomannan gum is tara gum.
40. A stabiliser system as claimed in Claim 37 characterised
in that the weight ratio of micro-crystalline cellulose to total
carboxymethyl cellulose and galactomannan gum is in the range 4:1
to 1:4.
41. A stabiliser system as claimed in Claim 40 characterised
in that the range is 2:1 to 1:3.
21

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~`~ c~731
S~
The invention relates to ice cream and to a st~biliser
*yst~lu iol llse, l`or ins-tancc, ~ ic~ cream.
The way in which ice cream beha~e~ on ex~oPure to nor~al
room temperature is important for -the consumer. I~ ~ product
behaves too atypically, for instance if a product melts too
rapidly or separates into a ~atty phase and a clear aqueous
phase on melting, -then the product will be unacceptable. In
the ice crea~ industry methods have been developed ior
measuring suoh properties, ~or instanee melt-down &nd stand-
up. These are described later.
It is known that such properties can be afieeted by
the use of stab~lisers, o~ten called thickeners. A problem
that arises is that the stabiliser~ deleteriously af~ect
the feel of the ice cream in the mouth; a eloying, ~ummy
or even greasy ~eel can oocur. ~his problem is acute in
ice creams that require more than usual stabilisation.
~hat is desired is a stabiliser system that is good or at
least adequate with respect to all aspects of stability. This
is difficult to achieve ~or normaliee creams and particularly
so for ice creams that require more than usual stabilisation.
A stabiliser ~ystem has now been ~ound that is surprisingly
e~ective in stabilising ice cream without gi~ing
an unacceptable mouth-feel. The stabiliser system i9
microcry~talline cellulose in combination with one or more
o~ carboxymethylcellulose and galaoto~annan gums. PreYerably
the stabiliser system oonslst~ o~ microcrystalline cellulose,
~ carboxymethylcelluloqe and a galactomannan gum. Example3
; ~of galactomannan gums are guar gum, locu~t bean gu~ and tara
gum.
The lnvention there~ore~ provides an ice cream ~ontaining
a stabilising~amount o~ microcrystalline cellulose and one
2 - ~

cQ731
5~ ~3 ~
or luole of c~lrbo.~ymeltlylcclllllose and galactoman~tc~ uu~s,
~alactom~lltlan gum is p~fer.lbl~r pres~ntO
Tho nluoullt of microcrystalline cellulose IS preferably
at least O.Olp, particularly preferably at least O.l~oO
Prefer~bly not more -than 0.8~o will be used~ particularly
prcferably not more than Oo~S/7cost is a factor.
pre~erred range is 0015qo to 004~0, par-ticularly to 0,~/0.
The amolmt o~ total car~o~Yymethyl-cellulose (cQlclllated as
sodium carbo~ymethylcellulose) and galactomannan gums is
pre~erably not more than 15~, particu~arly preferably not
more than 0.5~0 and preferably is in the range OolS~/O to
0035/0. The lo~er limit for carbo~Yyme-thylcellulose is
preferably 0.01%9 The lolrer limit for galactomannQn gu~s,
in particular for locust bean gum, is preferably O.OS,0~
Of course not more than one compone~t should be at or near
their lol~er limits, in any one stabiliser sys-tem.
- The weight ratio of microcrystalli~e cellulose to total
carboxymethylcellulose (calculated as sodium carbox~mæthyl-
cellulose) alld galactomannan gume is pre~erably ill the~ -
range 4:1 to 1:~1, particularly preferabl~ in the ranga 2:1
to 1:3. Total stabliser is preferably in the range 0015
to 1-0~ particularly pre~erably 0.30 to O~S~O The weight
ratio of microcrystalline cellulose to carbo~Ymethylcellulose
is preferably no-t more than 3:1 alld preferably is not less
than 1:2.
As emphasised above the stabilisei- system is particularly
use~ul in ice creams that require more than usual stabilisation
A proble~l~with con~ention~l ice creams is tha-t at deep
,
Xree~e temperatures, eg. -20C, they cannot be served or
eaten as readily as when they are a-t normal eating temp-
eratures, eg. -10 C. The consumer canIIot treat them ~ven
aRpro~imately ln -the normal ma~lner im~ediately whell t~l;en
from the deep ~roeze. In some cases cnnventional icc crea~s
¢annot even be scooped out with a spoon at -20C, i.e. are
::
not, spoon~lble. Re~ormulatibn to ensure that such

~ o~731
~S~73L~
properties, eg. spoonability at deep freeze temperatures
are approxima-tely those expected at normal eating temp-
eratures is comparatively simple. Methods are outlined
later. The dif~iculty is that such reformulation leads
to products that do not have acceptable properties, in
particular stability, a$ normal eating temperature~. It
has 3esmed impussible to get an ice cream that ha~ at both
deep freeze and normal eating temperatures even approxi~ately
the serving and eating properties conventionally e~pected
at normal eating temperatures and that is sufficiently
stable. The present inve~tion provides a stabiliser ~ystem
with which this can be achieved.
It will be appreciated that the product-characteristics
required ~or a conventional ice cream will depend on the
personal tastes oi the consumer and ice creams are formulated
to meet a variety o~ such ta~te~; the ~or~ulation o~ any one
conventional ice cream will depend on the taste~ oi the
consu~er~ concerned. In thi~ context a conventional ice
cream is one prepared by a process involving ~reezing and
hardening to tem-peratures in the order of -20C to -40C.
One important characteristic oi ice cream particularly in
relation to scoopability is the log C, as de~ined later,
o~ the ice crea~. In the UK ~or instance, an ioe crea~
can normally only be called a conventional ice cream i~
its log C at -20C aiter hardening i3 in the range 2.9 to
3.7; usually -the log C oi a UX non dairy ice crea~ at
_20C ai~ter hardening will be in the range 3.3 to 3.7; ~or
a dairy ice cream the range is 2.9 to 3.3. In other
countries values for log C wlll be comparable but can be
different, often higher, a~d indeed even within a country
- 4 -
. , ~

~Q731
~ 5~
various conventional ice creams will vary in -th~ir log C
values (A technique for measuring C~ the penetrometer value,
and hence log C is described la-ter in the speciiication).
Whatever the conventional ice cream used, its properties
at deep-freeze temperatures can be approximated to those
expected at normal ea-ting templerature by adding ~reezing-
poin-t depressants such as monosiaccharides and low molecular-
weight alcohols, preierably polyalcohols and in particular
glyoerol and sorbitol. It has been found that nor~ally
sufiicient oi such freezing-point depressants should be
added to the iormulation oi a co~ventional ice cream, eg.
at expense o~ wa$er, to lower the log C at -20C by between
0.25 and 1, pre~erably by 0.4 to 0.75. ~he notional replace-
men$g eg. o~ ~reezing-point depressant ~or sugar~water, should
be such that the product has the desired (by the consumer)
sweetness as well as the desired log C, or spoonability,
at -2QC.
As indicated above, a problem ~acing ice crea~ manu-
facturers is that in general ice creams ~ormulated to have
the conventional eating temperature properties at -20C, in
particular to be spoonable at -20C, have unacceptably poor
properties, eg. stand-up and meltdown, at nor~al eating
temperatures~ For the ice cream to be spoonable at -20C
it has been found that its log C should preierably be less
than 2.8, particularly pre~erably less tha~ 2.5; a corre-
lation has bee~ iou~d to exist between spoo~ability and
log C.
An e~pecially important aspect oi the present invention
is an improvement in an ice cream whose log C (C being it5
penetrometer value) at -20C has been lowered by between
0.?5 and 1 by use o~ ~reezi~g-point depressants, the improve-
~ent oonsisting o~ the use o~ the stabiliser system o~ ithe
. . - . . . . . .

cQ731
~I:)S~iL7~
present invention.
Microcrystalline cellulose is a well-known industrial product.
Its use at comparatively high levels in low calorie products,
including low-calorie ice creams, is described in sritish patent
specification 961~398. Processes for its preparation are well-
known and are for instance described in US 3,157,518. One
problem with microcrystalline cellulose is its dispersability.
Methods for overcoming this are well-known; a particular technique
involves the use of carboxymethylcellulose. Microcrystalline
cellulose is sold under the trade mark Avicel by FMC Corporation
and a readily dispersible form containing sodium carboxymethyl-
cellulose is sold as Avicel RC-591. It is stated to be a colloi-
dal form of microcrystalline cellulose which has been blended
with sodium carboxymethylcellulose and dried. The amount of
sodium carboxymethylcellulose lS ~ , by weight of micro-
crystalline cellulose. Microcrystalline cellulose is fully
characterised in for instance GB 961,398 and US 3,157,518 but
briefly can be stated to be cellulose crystallite aggregates with
a level-off D.P. Level-off DP is the average level-off degree of
polymerisation measured in accordance with the paper by O.A.
Battista entitled "Hydrolysis and Crystallisation of Cellulose"
Vol. 42 (1950), Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, pages 502
to 507. As stat d in GB 961j398 suitable microcrystalline
celluloses have average level-off DP's in the range 125 to 375,
particularly 200 ~o 300; the particle siæe of the aggregates of
microcrystalline cellulose will usually be in the range 1 to
300 microns.
Galactomannan gums are well-known material and are
~ 6 --

cQ7~'l
~CI 5~7~
- describecl for instance hy 1~l. Glick~tan in "Gum Techno'lo~y
in the Food Industry", ~cademic Press, 1969. Pre~erred
galactomannan gu~s ~or use in -the in~ention are locust bean
gtllU and tara gum. Carboxymethylcelluloses are standa1tl
S industrial products.
In this specification, including the claims, percen-
tages are by weight and in particular are by l~eight o~ ice
cream e~cept l~here the conte~t reqnires otherwiseO
Other than in the use of s~ icie~t ~reezing point
' \ ' ' :
- \ . ~
- \ , - , ' ' :~
\
: , \ ' , ~``
\
''
,
.
': ' \ ~ :. '
\
- 7 -

cQ731
~LC35~7~L
depressant for the preferred aspect of the invention and in
the use o~ a thickening agent compri~ing particular components
no especial insight is required in the formulation or
processing o~ ice creams accord:ing to the invention. Details
o~ conventional ~ormulations and processing conditions for
ice cream can be ~ound in the usual trade publications and
text books. Particularly useful in this respect is
Arbuckle, "Ioe Cream", 1972 ~2nd Edition), AVI Publishing
Corp., Westpoint, Conn.
The invention will now be illustrated further by the
~ollowing examples.
The properties of the stabili~er system are most
surprising when compared with the properties of the separate
componentsO This is illustrated in the examples but it will
be appreciated that the stabiliser system is also useful in
products other than ice cream.
EXAMPLE 1
.
An ice cream was prepared by conventional proces~ing
techniques to the following ~ormulation:
In~redient
Made~up skimmed ~ilk (32.5% solids) 27
Sucrose ~3
~lucose syrup 2
Liquid oil blend 9.5
Monoglyceride emul~i~ier 0.45
Colour and flavour 0.03
( Locust bean gum 0.15
Thick-
ening Avicel RC 591~* 0.2
agents
SQdium carboxymethyl cellulose* 0.15
Salt 0 05
Glycerol 3.0
Water to 100
*Supplied by ICI as powder B600 **trade mark

~ cQ731
~35~
* Supplied by FMC and believed to contain by weight il%
sodium carboxymethyl cellulose.
The presence of the thickening agents can be detected
analytically in such a product. The product itself is an
excellent ice cream resembling conventional UK ice cream in
eating properties but being spoonable at -20C.
E~AMPLE 2
An ice cream mix was prepared frDm the Yollowing
ingredients, in parts by weight:
Palm oil 505
Stearic monoglyoeride 0.15
Spray-dried milk powder 10.0
Sucrose 14.0
Microcry~talline cellulose 0.4
(containing 11~ of sodiam
carboxymeth~lcellulose)
Sodium carboxymeth~loellulose* 0.2
Locust bean gum 0.22
Trisodium citrate 0.3
Water 64
The stearic monoglyceride was di~persed in the p~lm
oil to give a fat pha~e. The ~ilk powder was di3persed in
the water and to the dispersicn waæ added the remaining
ingredients, giving an aqueous pha~e. ~he ~at and aqueous
phase at 65 were mixed, homogenised at a pressure of 2000
psi and the emul~ion ~ormed was pasteurised at 70 ~or 20
minutes and cooled at 5 at which it ~ad pH 605. Aiter
ageing for 2 hour~ at 5C 6 part~ of a concentrated orange
~uice, 0.04 parts of coloaring a~ent, and 3 parts o~ a 33~0 by
weight aqueous solution of citric acid were mi~ed with the
emulsion. The re~ulting emulsion o~ pH 3.5 w~s converted to
~ 5~
*Supplied by ICI as/powder B600
.
_ 9 _
:::

cQ731
" .~
~ L~S~t~
an ice cream by cooling and whipping at -4, and the ice cream
was blast frozen to -20 and stored.
This example shows the use of the stabiliser system in
stabilising an acid ice cream, a type of ice cream that requires
more stabili~ation than an average ice cream.
The stabiliser system is particularly useful in an acid ice
cream, i.e. an ice cream with a pH in the range 3.0 to 5.2. The
pH should, as well as being within this range, preferably be
sufficiently below the isoelectric point of any acid-precipi-
table protein present in substantial amount for that protein tobe present substantially uncoagulated. Alternatively whey
protein preferably purified by reverse 05mosis, can be used;
whey protein is not acid precipitable. Such ice creams axe
described and claimed in our co-pending German OS 2361658, open
for public inspection before June 4, 1975.
EXAMPLES 3~ to 14 and COMPARISONS A TO F
Ice cream mixes were prepared conventionally to the
following formulation. Further details are given in Table 1
immediateIy before claims which also shows results obtained with
ice cream prepared conventionally from the mixtures. A standard
U.K. non-dairy ice cream differs from this formulation in
containing no glycerol and 1.4~ by weight more sugar. 3%
glycerol is roughly equivalent in sweetness to 1.5% sugar.
~Spray dried milk powder 9.5
Sugar 13.5
Maltodextrin 40 DE* (Glucose syrup) 1.7
Palm oil ~ 9.5
Monoglycerdie from palm oil Q.5
Glycerol 3.Q
-- 10 --
'

~ cQ731
~S~
Salt 0~05
Flavour and colour O.1
S-tabiliser~ Table l**
~ater to 100
* DE = dextrose equivalent
** ~he SCMC used was powder B600 supplied by ICI ~imited.
The log C values at -20C o~ Examples 3 to 14 and
Comparisons A to F were in the range 2.S and 2.9 and averaged
2~7. The log C of the standard ice cream mentioned above was
in the ra~ge 3.2 to 3.3.
Test methods
. _ .
Melt-Down Test and Shape Retention
A rectangular block o~ ice cream o~ length 13.6 cm,
height 400 cm and width about 8.8 cm which has been stored
at -20C i9 placed on a wire gauze (10 ~ires per inch) in
a~ atmosphere maintained at 15C. ~rrangements are made
ior collection o~ the liquid drained fro~ the gauze. The
time ~or the collection o~ the iirst 10 ml o~ liquid is
noted. The volume o~ liquid collected i~ each subsequent
10 ~inute period is measured and the slope o~ the ~raph
obtained by plotting volume collected against time i~ taken
as the melt-down ~mls/hr). A~ter 4 hours thawi~g photo-
graphs o~ the residue o~ the brick are take~, and the degree
oi shape retention assessed as bad~ poor~ -fair, good or very
good.
~tability to Temperature ~y~
This was carried out o~ a~ appro~i~ately cuboid ~ gallon
block oi ice cream in a plastic container. A~ter storage in
a deep-~reeze it ~as tra~s~erred to ambient (20C~ ~or 12 hours
and then to~a re~ridgerator at -10~ Next day the block was
subjected to ~urther temperature shock cycling by being taken
,
11

.
c~731
3~5~7~L~
out o~ the re~rigerator and le~t at ambient ~or 1 hour.
~his (each day 1 hour at ambient) was repeated to a total
of six times and then the block was returned to the deep-
~reeze for assessment the next day. ~he total test -took,
allowing ~or a weekend, not more than ten days~ Product
stability was assessed as ~ollows:
Bad : total breakdown
Poor : ~20~o~ product converted to serum
Fair : 5 - 20% of product converted to serum
Good : C 5% 0~ product converted to serum
C and Lo~ C
To determine C and hence log C the iollowing method
is used:
Principle
The hardness o~ ice cream is measure~ by allowing a
standard cone to penetrate a sample ior 15 seconds using a
cone penetrometer. ~he C-value can be calculated ~ro~ the
penetration depth.
~ 7
- 12 -
- . : .~ ,. . .. .

cQ.73~
~53L~
Appara$us:
Ebonite cone
With an apex angle of 40 +10 and the tip blunted by
a few strokes on fine abrasive paper to give a flat
0-3 _0.03 mm in diameter. '~otal weight of cone and
sliding penetrometer shaft 80 +0.3 g.; also additional
weights of 8V +0.3g.
Penetrometer
With a scale calibrated in 0.1 mm., and.
fitted with a lens. The penetrometer made by Sommer
and Runge, Berlin, is reco~mended, parti¢ularly for
static use. The Hutchinson instrumènt c~n al~o be
used; it requires ~o electricity SUpply3 bu$ mu~t be
modi~ied for sati~factory operation. The accuracy o~
pene~rometer timing mechanisms must be checked regularly.
The use of a x3 magni~ication lens o~ about 6 - 8 cm.
diameter fitted to the penetrome$er facilitates the
- setting of the cone tip on the sample surface9 and an
unfocused light limited to the equivalent of a l-watt
2Q bulb at a distance of about 5 cm. (to aYoid heating t~e
sample surface) is also advantageous.
Temperature probe
Reading to within 0,lC. The temperature probe should
have a ste~ about 1 ~m. in dia~eter and about 4 cm.
long. Its accuracy should be checked regularly in
baths of know~ temperaturas.
::
- 13
.

~ c~.73l
1~5~7~:~
Temper~n~ f~cili-les
(a) Room controlled at required temperature ~ 1C;
(b) Gonstant_temperature cabinets, tolerance + 0.2~C.
The forced-draught constant~temperature cabinets
supplied by Zero N~Vo Rotterdam are satisfactory.
Process:
Samplin~
Samples should be convenient size and p~efera~ly with
smooth surface~ to incre~se accuracy.
iO Tempering
2 Days at whatever temperature is required e.g.
- -20C. Measure te~perature aocurately before penetration.
Mea~urement
Where possible, penetrations are made in the
temperature-controlled room, and should be completed
- within two minutes o~ removing -the sample ~rom the constant-
temperature cabinet~
1. Insert ~the temperature probe as near horizoDtally a~
~20 possible ~at a few ~m. below the sa~ple surface; read and
~: note the sa~ple temperature a~ter 30 ~econds. (Reject any
: ~amples di~fering by ~ore than 0.5C fro~ the nominal te~t
- . ~
~: ~ temperature~) -
~ ,
: ~:
~ :
.- .. . . .. , . . . .. ~ ... .

~-~ c~7~1
~L63 5~71~
2. Place the samples on the levelled penetrometer table~
3.~ Set the cone tip accurately on the sample surface~
using a lens and, i~ necessary, oblique lighting.
4. Releaise the arresting device and allow the cone to
penetra-te the sample for 15 seconds.
5 Read and note the penetration depth.
6. Should the penetration depth be less than 72 x 0.1 mm.
(equivalent to a C_value of more than 500 g./cm.2) the
measurement should be repeated with the cone weight
increased by 80 g.
Further 80 g. weights
may be added as necessary to ensure adequate penetration
of the sample and the C-value scale reading corrected--
accordingly.
7. Penetration measurements should not be made within
2 cm. of the sample edge nor within 2.5 cm. o~ each othcr.
Determinations in which air bubbleis~ cracks, etc. inter~ere
should be rejected. -
Calculation of C_va~lues
20 ~ ~he C-value can be calcalated~frbm the penetration
depth using the formu~a: -
~ x F
C~ 6
where C = Yield value or C_value (g.~cm.2)
P =~To~tal welght of cone and sliding stem (gO~ -
; P = Penetration depth (0.1 mm.)
`~ ~ = Factor dependlng on cone angle:
.: . . .
, . . , . , -. i -
',~: . . ,, ' ~ ' ' '

~5~7~ cQ731
Cone an~le K valwe
9670
5840
6~ 281
1~40
* Depending on the likely so~tne~s o~ the product, the cone
weight should be adjusted, e.g.
at -10C use 80 gm
at -15C use 1~0 gm
at -20C ase 240 gm
i.e. it depend~ on temper~ture o~ measure~ent.
C valaes will usually be taken a~ter hardening
conventionally, a9 for inst,ance described on page 4,
lines 18 to 209 and in the standard text-books~ -
It should be noted that an ice cream according to ~he
invention preierably has a mslt-down, determined as described
above, o~ less thMn 25 ~lJhr and particularly pre~erably o~
between S and 20 ml/hr..
It should ~urther be noted that the log C at -20C oi
an ice cream according to the invention should pre~erably
not be less than 2,3.
Further details of suitable ~ircrocrystalline celluloses
a~e available i~ pa~phlets ob$ainable iro~ FMC Corporation,
A~icel Department~ Marcus Hook, Pe~nsyl~a~ia 19061 ~or i~stance
1n Bulletin ~C-16 and pamphlets RC-30 and ~C-34. RC-30
describes use o~ microcrystalline cellulose i~ ~ro~en desserts
and states, inter alia9 that i'It is co~patible with all stabil-
islng systems except:those containing Guary Loc~st Bean, and
Na Alginate",
':
16 _

~[35~7~ .,t',
~ 1--* ~ 1 0 ~
O O~ I~ 1~ ~ S IJ ~D
q ~ 3 ~
P'. E ~
~DX~ noooooooooooo O
g ~O ~ , g l_ ~ ~ O l_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n r~
~ (D ~ o\O D (D
--~ 3 1~ ~
- g ~ ~ *
O O O O o O O O I-- o
O O
_ Q ~ ~1 3
~D 3 Q ~ ~
n m j- i- ~ 3 It lq
- n u~
O D~
~D ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O U~
O Hl O ~ i- ~ i~ O ~ i' ~ i ~ i
~ O C
P' rt It ; i"
O ~ ~ . O
n ~ o o ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ; ~P
~ ~ ~O;
O ~ ~D
j_ X ~ V ~ V V V V V V V
O O O O O O O ~0 ~ O ~ O O O O ~rl O O' !~
' --3
8 ~
o ~ ~ w ~ w w ~ ~ O ~I ~ ~ ~ w w w O a~
~4 ~ n ~o
o ~ ~ p~
H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ O
n ~ rD n n n n ,~ ,q ~ ~n ,~ ~ n ~ n n
~, n ~r n n ~, ~a ~ ~a q Iq ~
n 3 ~ ~ ~ D n ~ n ~a
(D i-- i-- i'
(D (D lq
--17--

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1051711 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2011-07-26
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: First IPC derived 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1996-04-03
Grant by Issuance 1979-04-03

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
UNILEVER LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
DAVID J. FINNEY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1994-04-19 1 26
Claims 1994-04-19 4 163
Abstract 1994-04-19 1 36
Drawings 1994-04-19 1 14
Descriptions 1994-04-19 16 613