Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
lOS6419
1 VEHICLE ROLL-OVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE
The present invention relates generally to roll-over pro-
tect:ive structures for vehicles and nDre particularly to such
structures which are easily manufactured, inexpensive and fail-
ure resistant.
Generally, previous protective structures have been made
with upright supports requiring rigidity-adding longitudinal and
lateral cross members topped by a canopy. Such structures are
shown in the ~.S. Patent 3,787,085 granted to D. H. Bucher, et al
10 on January 22 1974, and the U.S. Patent 3,841,430 granted to
J.H. Babbitt, Jr., et al on October 15, 1974. In some cases since
tubular closed sections members were used, previous structures
required parts to protect agains t corner failures where the up-
right supports were fastened to the cano~y such as disclosed in
the U.S. Patent 3,632,134 granted to J.H. Babbitt, Jr., et al
on January 4, 1972.
Summary of the Invention
It is an object of the present invention to provide an
easily manufactured roll-over protective structure which utilizes
20 a "loose leg" design concept. The loose leg concept substitutes
the vehicle chassis in place of the lower lateral and longitudinal
cross braces currently required in similar protective structures
and thus cuts asse~ly and material costs. Further, since only
the legs are secured to the frame, the structure can easily be
removed from the chassis for servicing of the vehicle.
By virtue of the roll-over protective structure's simple
construction, certain manufacturing freedoms may be utilized in
producing each plate me~ber which makes up the structure. For
example, it is possible to manufacture various size roll-over
30 protective s tnlctures for a wide variety of vehicles with a mini-
mum amount of tooling and low labor costs.
- 1 -
1056a~19
1 The present invention further provides a roll-over protec-
tive structure which utilizes a "reverse loading" design concept
to optimize the structural design. The reverse loading concept
places the maximum and minimum section mDduli of each structure
at the point where the maximum and minimum bending moments, re-
spectively, are likely to occur during a vehicle roll-over. This
maximizes structural strength while minimizing the amount of
material required.
Further, by forming a tripodal configuration from each of the
plate members, the joints may be placed away from the corners of
the structure. Generally, the corners are subject to the highest
stress, and thus, the lack of joints at the corners minimizes the
pOS8 ibility of corner failures.
The above and additional objects and advantages of the
present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the
art from a consideration of the following detailed description
of the preferred embodiments when taken in conjunction with the
accompanying drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the left side of a roll-over
protective structure as shown mounted on a vehicle.
Fig. 2 is a section taken along line 2--2 of Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a perspective view of a roll-over protective
structure of an alternate embodiment.
Fig. 4 is a section taken along line 4--4 of Fig. 3.
Fig. 5 is a perspective view of a roll-over protective struc-
ture of a further alternate embodiment.
Descri~tion of the Prefer ed E~bodiments
Refexring now to Fig. 1, there is shown a vehicle or tractor
designated in its entirety by the reference numeral 10. The trac-
tor 10 includes a longitudinally extending front frame overhanging
a hinge pin area 16 which pi~otally connects the frame 12 to a
1056419
1 longitudinally extending rear frame 14. The front and rear frames
12 and 14 each include conventional transmission, drive, and axle
housings, and each is supported by a pair of dual drive wheels
18 and 20, respectively, rotatably secured thereto for rotation
about the transverse axes of the frames 12 and 14. An operator's
control station, designated in its entirety by the numeral 22,
having a platform 23 is spaced vertically above the overhang of
frame 12.
A roll-over protective structure 24 is secured to the frame
12 by mounting means 26 which will hereinafter be described.
m e structure 24 surrounds the operator's control station 22 to
protect a seated operator in the event of a tractor roll-over.
m e structure 24 includes four substantially identical tri-
podal members 30 each having an upright leg 30U bifurcated at its
upper end into a right and left leg 30L and 30R. The members 30
are preferably blanked from flat metal plate, preferab~y ranging
from .25 inch to .50 inch thick, into substantially Y-shaped con-
figurations. The Y-shaped configurations are then formed in a
forming die to form the tripodal members having an open section,
U-channel cross section as shown in Fig. 2.
The ad~antage of blanking and forming is that different
length, height, and width roll-over protective structures for a
wide variety of different configuration and size vehicles can be
made by merely adding a trimming operation: the same blanking dies
can blank a number of different thicknesses of metal~ the same
forming dies can form the different thicknesses, and the trimming
operation can trim the legs to different lengths.
The structure 24 is unitized by welding together the legs
30R a~d 30L of each tripodal member 30 to the legs 30L and 30R,
respectively, of o~her tripodal me~bers 30 until four tripodal
members form an open-bottom, box-like framework having upright
legs 30U. Welding the ends of the legs together places the rel-
1056419
l atively weak welded joints of the framework away from the bifur-
cations or corners where the loads are generally concentrated
during a tractor roll-over. Further, the open sections permit
large deflections in the corners, both of which minimize the
pos~ibility of corner failures due to fracture or localized
buckling.
At the bottom ends of the four upright legs 30U are the
mounting means 26 which include four conventional, vibration
absorbing, rubber bushings 34 inserted into holes in the upright
legs 30U. Easily removable bolts 36 are inserted through the four
rubber bushings 34 to demountably secure the framework to the
frame 12. When secured, the frame 12 closes off the bottom of
the framework to complete the roll-over protective structure 24.
Thus, the four tripodal members 30 are connected together at the
top only and the legs can be "loose" until the framework is
mounted on the frame 12. Since the conventional lower lateral
and longitudinal cross braces are no longer required, this means
that significant weight and cost reductions are achieved.
A further weight savings and an optimization of design has
been achieved by the application of a "reverse loading" design
concept which is easily applicable to open section structures.
The reverse loading concept assumes the maximum bending moment in
the event of a tractor roll-over to be at the bifurcations or the
top corners of the structure 24 with a steadily decreasing moment
down the upright legs 30U to a minimal moment at the mounting
means 26. m e design concept then generally places the maximum
section moduli of the U-sections at the bifurcations with
steadily decreasing section moduli down the upri~ht legs 30U to
minimum section moduli at the mounting means 26. The section
moduli at the bifurcations of the structure 24 shown in Fig. l
are approximately three times greater than at the bottoms of the
legs 30U. These section moduli do not yield to a uniform stress
1056419
1 distribution in the elastic region during tractor roll-over load-
ing, but do when the structure 24 is loaded into the plastic
range.
Referring now to Fig. 3 there is shown a further alternate
embodiment of a roll-over protective structure 40 which includes
two pairs of different tripodal members 42 and 44. The tripodal
members 42 each have an upright leg 42U bifurcated at its upper
end into a left and right leg 42L and 42R while the tripodal
members 44 each have an irregularly contoured upright leg 42U
bifurcated at its upper end into a right and left legs 44R and
44L. The legs 44U are contoured to provide clearance for tractor
parts such as wheels. The contour can be easily produced Dy an
additional forming operation just before the members are welded
together.
In the alternate embodiment shown in Fig. 3, the blanked Y-
shaped configuration is formed into an open section, right angle
section as shown in Fig. 4. The right angle section provides a
slightly weaker section having smaller section moduli, but permits
mounting auxiliary items, such as glass, in a simple and straight
forward fashion.
Referring now to Fig. 5, therein is shown a further alter-
nate embodiment of the roll-over protective structure generally
designated by 124. The structure 124 is composed of two dif-
ferent box-type frameworks 126 and 128. The framework 12~ is
a weldment of four substantially identical tripodal members 130,
manufactured as previously described above, rigidly mounted on
the framework 128. The framework 128 is a weldment of four sub-
stantially identical tripodal members 132 different from the
tripodal members 130 but manufactured in a similar manner. Each
of the upright legs of the tripodal members 130 is welded to a
corresponding upright leg of the tripodal members 132 to form
a closed box-type structure which is secured to the frame 12
~056419
1 by vertical bolts and bushings (not shown) through the inside
lower portions of the upright legs of the tripodal members 132.
The inward slope of the legs toward the bo~tom of the framework
128 ~provides clearance for tractor parts such as wheels.
While the invention has been described in conjunction with
specific embodiments, it is to be understood that many alterna-
tives, m~difications, and variations will be apparent to those
skilled in the art in light of the aforegoing description. Ac-
cordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modi-
fications, and variations which fall within the spirit and scopeof the appended claims.
