Language selection

Search

Patent 1056687 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1056687
(21) Application Number: 1056687
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF A DISHWASHING DETERGENT
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE FABRICATION D'UN DETERSIF POUR LAVE-VAISSELLE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C11D 3/06 (2006.01)
  • C11D 3/395 (2006.01)
  • C11D 11/00 (2006.01)
  • C11D 17/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • IRVINE, JOHN K. (Canada)
  • MITCHELL, MICHAEL D. (Canada)
  • BERK, GUNTER H. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • CONN CHEM LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • CONN CHEM LIMITED
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1979-06-19
(22) Filed Date: 1976-04-08
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A B S T R A C T
A process for the manufacture of a dishwashing
detergent, containing sodium tripolyphosphate hexahydrate, in-
cluding the steps of:
(a) uniformly distributing an aqueous solution of
alkaline detergent salt onto a mixture of
constituents, including the sodium tripolyphosphate
mixing in a mixing vessel of predetermined volume
to uniformly coat the constituents and essentially
hydrate the sodium tripolyphosphate, the ratio of
the volume of the dry constituents charged into the
mixing vessel prior to the distribution of the
aqueous solution of alkaline detergent salt, to the
volume of the air in the vessel being between about
1:25 and 1:8;
-and-
(b) mixing the formed agglomerate in the vessel to
ventilate it for a predetermined time to the air of
the vessel.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY
OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE:
:
1. An improved process for the agglomerating of a dish-
washing detergent, containing sodium tripolyphosphate hexahydrate,
including the steps of:
(a) uniformly distributing an aqueous solution of
alkaline detergent salt onto a mixture of con-
stituents, including the sodium tripolyphosphate,
mixing in a mixing vessel of predetermined
volume to uniformly coat the constituents and
essentially hydrate the sodium tripolyphosphate,
the ratio of the volume of the dry constituents
charged into the mixing vessel prior to the
distribution of the aqueous solution of alkaline
detergent salt, to the volume of the air in the
vessel being between about 1:25 and about 1:8;
-and-
(b) mixing the formed agglomerate in the vessel to
ventilate it for a predetermined time to the air
of the vessel.
2. The process of Claim 1, wherein the ratio of the volume
of the dry constituents to the volume of air in the vessel is
between about 1:18 and about 1:8.
3. The process of Claim 2, wherein the aqueous solution of
the alkaline detergent salt has an SiO2/Na2O ratio of between
about 2.4:1 and about 3.25:1.
4. The process of Claim 2, wherein a small amount of water
14

is uniformly distributed onto the mixture of constituents prior
to the uniform distribution of the aqueous solution of alkaline
detergent salt to commence the hydration of the sodium tripoly-
phosphate.
5. The process of Claim 4, wherein a small amount of water
is distributed onto the constituents subsequent to the addition
of the aqueous solution of alkaline detergent salt.
6. The process of Claim 3, wherein said alkaline detergent
salt comprises an aqueous solution of sodium silicate.
7. The process of Claim 3, wherein an aqueous solution of
a non-ionic surfactant polyol is uniformly distributed on the
constituents subsequent to the uniform distribution of the
aqueous solution of alkaline detergent salt.
8. The process of Claim 3, wherein an aqueous solution of
a non-ionic surfactant polyol is added and the aqueous solution
of alkaline detergent salt is added in two portions, one portion
prior to the addition of the non-ionic surfactant polyol and
the other subsequent thereto.
9. The process of Claim 8, wherein the alkaline detergent
salt is an aqueous solution of sodium silicate.
10. The process of Claim 4, further including the steps of
granulating the ventilated agglomerate, and conducting the
granulated agglomerate to a sizing operation to obtain fractions
of desirable size and undesirable size, and aging the fraction of

agglomerate of desired size.
11. The process of Claim 10, wherein the agglomerate is
aged for at least 12 hours.
12. The process of Claim 2, wherein the amount of sodium
tripolyphosphate, added, includes a portion of agglomerate of un-
desirable size, resulting from the process of Claim 10.
13. The process of Claim 2, wherein the mixing vessel is
a mixing drum rotatable about its horizontal axis, which drum
is rotated during the agglomerating process and includes a
plurality of flighting on the interior wall in spaced relation
for assisting to mix the constituents.
14. An improved process for the agglomeration of a dish-
washing detergent, including sodium tripolyphosphate as the alkaline
condensed phosphate, including the steps of:
(a) charging dry constituents which form a part of
the finished agglomerate into a mixing vessel of
predetermined volume for the dry mixing of same,
the ratio of the volume of the dry constituents
to the volume of air in the vessel being between
about 1:18 and 1:8;
(b) distributing an aqueous solution of alkaline
detergent salt, having an SiO2/Na2O ratio of
between about 2.4:1 and about 3.25:1, uniformly
on the mixture so as to evenly coat the
constituents and essentially hydrate the sodium
tripolyphosphate, subsequently adding sufficient
16

water if necessary to complete the hydration;
(c) ventilating the agglomerating product and
(d) subsequently sizing and aging the finished product.
15. The process of Claim 14, wherein the ratio of the
volume of the dry constituents added to the vessel to the volume
of air in the vessel is between about 1:18 and about 1:8.
16. The process of Claim 15, wherein a small amount of
water is uniformly distributed onto the constituents prior to the
uniform distribution of the aqueous solution of the alkaline
detergent salt to commence the hydration of the sodium tripoly-
phosphate.
17. The process of Claim 15, wherein the alkaline detergent
salt is an aqueous solution of sodium silicate.
18. The process of Claim 15, wherein an aqueous solution
of a non-ionic surfactant polyol is uniformly distributed on
the constituents subsequent to the uniform distribution of the
alkaline detergent salt.
19. The process of Claim 15 wherein an aqueous solution
of a non-ionic surfactant polyol is added and the aqueous
solution of alkaline detergent salt is added in two portions, one
prior to the addition of the non-ionic surfactant polyol and
the other subsequent thereto.
20. The process of Claim 19, wherein the alkaline detergent
17

salt is an aqueous solution of sodium silicate.
21. The process of claim 15, wherein the step of sizing
the finished product comprises the granulating of the ventilated
agglomerate and conducting the granulated agglomerate to a
sizing operation and to obtain fractions of desirable size
and undesirable size and the step of aging comprises the aging
of the fraction of agglomerate of desirable size.
22. The process of claim 21, wherein the agglomerate is
aged for at least 12 hours.
23. The process of claim 15, wherein the mixing vessel
is a mixing drum rotatable about its horizontal axis which drum
is rotated during the agglomerating process and includes a
plurality of flighting on the interior wall in spaced relation
for assisting to mix the constituents.
24. A process for manufacturing in a single mixing vessel
a free-flowing granular dishwasher detergent of typical compo-
nents including hydrated forms of sodium tripolyphosphate, a
sodium silicate having a weight ratio of SiO2 to Na2O between
approximately 2.4:1 and approximately 3.25:1, chlorinated tri-
sodium phosphates, a non-ionic surfactant and their chemical
equivalents; said process comprising the steps of:
i) mixing in a ventilated mixing vessel, a dry
mixture of sodium tripolyphosphate and
chlorinated trisodium phosphate, the ratio of
the volume of said dry mixture and the volume
of said vessel being between about 1:25 and 1:8;
18

ii) spraying an aqueous solution of selected
silicate at ambient temperature onto said dry
mixture while continuing the mixing to form an
agglomerate of the dry mixture during hydration
of said sodium tripolyphosphate;
iii) spraying onto the formed agglomerate the
non-ionic surfactant at ambient temperature;
iv) coating the treated agglomerate by spraying
onto it further aqueous solution of selected
silicate at ambient temperature; and
v) mixing the coated agglomerate in the vessel
to ventilate it to the air of the vessel while
discharging the coated agglomerate from such
vessel.
25. A process of claim 24 wherein approximately 40% to
50% by weight of sodium tripolyphospate, 30% to 35% by
weight of chlorinated trisodium phosphate and 20% to 30% by
weight in total of sodium silicate are used.
26. A process of claim 25 wherein approximately 3% by
weight of non-ionic surfactant is used.
27. A process of claim 24 comprising the further inter-
vening steps of:
i) (a) after mixing, spraying a minor amount of
water to commence hydration of said sodium
tripolyphosphate; and
iv) (a) after coating, spraying a minor amount of
water to flush out the spraying system used
to spray said silicates.
19

28. A process of claim 24 wherein said volume ratio is
from 1:18 to 1:8.
29. An improved process for the agglomeration of a dish-
washing detergent containing sodium tripolyphosphate as the
alkaline condensed phosphate, including the steps of:
(a) charging the dry constituents including sodium
tripolyphosphate and a chlorinated compound for
enhanced cleaning action, into a horizontally
disposed rotating mixing drum, having a liquid
inlet disposed therein having a plurality of
spray nozzles disposed thereon in spaced relation,
said drum rotating about its horizontal axis and
having a plurality of interior flighting on the
interior wall of the drum, for admixing the
added constituents, the ratio of the volume of
the dry constituents to the volume of air in the
vessel being between about 1:25 and about 1:8;
(b) as the drum continues to rotate, uniformly
spraying:
(i) a small amount of water onto the dry
mixture through the nozzles to commence
the hydration of the sodium tripolyphosphate;
(ii) an aqueous solution of alkaline detergent
salt onto the rotating constituents for
uniform coating thereof;
(iii) an aqueous solution of non-ionic surfac-
tant polyols onto the mixture;

(iv) an aqueous solution of alkaline detergent
salt onto the rotating constituents for
uniform coating thereof;
(v) a small amount of water onto the mixture
to complete the hydration of the sodium
tripolyphosphate and clean the inlet and
spray nozzles of the highly viscous
alkaline detergent salt;
(c) rotating the drum for a predetermined time after
the last addition for the ventillation of the
agglomerate to the air of the drum;
(d) discharging the formed agglomeration from the
drum granulating the agglomerate, sizing the
granulated agglomerate into desirable and undesir-
able fractions of agglomerate and aging the
desirable fraction.
30. The process of claim 29 wherein the ratio of the volume
of dry constituents to the volume of air is between about
1:18 and about 1:8.
31. The process of claim 30, wherein the source of chlorine
was chlorinated trisodium phosphate.
32. The process of claim 30, wherein the aging of the
desirable fraction lasts for at least 12 hours.
21

33. The process of claim 30, wherein the alkaline
detergent salt is an aqueous solution of sodium silicate.
34. The process of claim 31 wherein the ratio of the
volume of the dry constituents to the volume of air is about
1:18.
35. The process of claim 31 wherein the ratio of the
volume of the dry constituents to the volume of air is about
1:8.
36. The process of claim 34 or 35 wherein the desirable
fraction is aged for at least 24 hours.
22

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ ~f56f~ii87
F IE LD OF I NVE N TI ON
This invention relates to an improved process for the
manufacture of dishwashing detergents in agglomerate form.
.
- BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The preferred form of today's dishwashing detergents
is the agglomerate because of its slower rate of solution than
powders in the dishwasher, thereby prolonging the cleaning
action of the detergent throughout the timed dishwashing cycle. ~?
.
Such dishwashing detergents include amoung their aotive ~onstit-
` 10 uents, a source of chlorine for enhanced cleaning action, and an
?: alkaline condensed phosphate and alkaline detergent salt for ~`
.i .
~ dispersion and peptization of the dirt and soil on the dishes. ~ ~
.,. , - . ~ . .
' Where alkaline detergent salt is comprised of liquid silicates,
'~.! the liquid silicates act as the binder for the source o~ chlorine,
?,~ I5 alkaline condensed phosphate and other dry ingredients in the
.j j . .
,.`f agglomerate.
A typical dishwashing agglomerate includes sodium tri-
~;'f polyphosphate as the alkaline condensed phosphate, sodium
silicate added in solution as the alkaline detergent salt and
20 binder, and chlorinated trisodium phosphate as the source of
chlorine in amounts of between 40%-50%, 30~-35~6, and 20%-30
~ respectively. A typical agglomerate is set out below.
'~ f CONSTITUENT ~ BY WEICHT
~, . .. .
~ Sodium Tripolphosphate 42.4
; 3 25 Chlorinated Trisodium Phosphate 21. 2 ~"
~ Sodium Silicate [ 2.4: lSi02/Na20 ] 12.2S
; Sodium Silicate [3.25: 1Si02~Na20 ] 19.00
. :f
.1f Pluronic [ L 62D] * 2.00 ;~
Pluronic [ L 61 ~ * 1.00
30 Water 2.15
"f ` lOO . 00
", -1- ~ ; ~:'
. j. . .

*The pluronics are used as a source of non-ionic sur-
factant polyols which may be replaced with other forms of low
foam non-ionic detergents.
The chlorinated trisodium phosphate is particularly
desirable since it imparts to -the detergent a good buffer
capacity at high alkalinity levels during the wash cycle and per-
mits effectual sheeting action during the rinse cycle to prevent
water spots and streaks.
Insofar as the use of the liquid silicates is concerned,
it is desirable to have an SiO2:Na20 ratio, as great as possible,
for greater scrubbing action by the SiO2 and greater protection
by the colloidal silica of the patterns and overglazes of fine
china against erosion, while at the same time, not too great, so
as to deleteriously prolong the drying time of the formulated
agglomerate, which is caused by having too much SiO2. Therefore,
a delicate balance must be maintained to obtain maximum benefits
from the SiO2 added.
-I It is also desirable to limit the amount of Na20 in
the detergent because it is a major contributor to the causticity
of the detergent and erodes the glaze of fine china.
; Where sodium tripolyphosphate is used, it must be in
.:,
~ its hydrated forml i.e. sodium tripolyphosphate hexahydrate, in
-. the finished detergent product to be useful, so as not to
hydrate in the dishwasher during the wash cycle and thereby gum,
gel or cake in the dishwashing detergent dispenser, clogging same.
Therefore, such hydration must take place either prior to the
sodium tripolyphosphate being incorporated into the detergent
` formulation or during the detergent's formulation. If hydrated
prior to incorporation, the premanufactured sodium tripolyphos-
phate hexahydrate increases the cost of the formulation. If the
: ,
,:~,, .
..... . . . .. , , ~ . . . . . ~ . .. . . .

i6~37
sodium tripolyphosphate is hydra-ted af-ter incorporation into the
formulation, as was usually the method employed in the prior art
formulations, the agglomerate "balled", forming large amorphous~
lumps containing up to about 15~ of the formulated agglomerate,
and to be useful, required crushing.
While the prior art has proposed the controlling of
the water content of the formulation within cer~ain limits to
minimize the "balling" and formulation o the large amorphous
lumps, this method has not been successful.
~ 10 It is therefore, an object of this invention to provide ~-
an improved process for the manufacture of a free flowing, more
uniformly agglomerated dishwashing detergent, utilizing sodium
. tripolyphosphate, whereby the amount of "balling" is reduced to
less than about 2%. .
Further and other objects, advantages and features of ~:
... .
the invention will be realized by those skilled in the art from
the ollowing summary of the invention and detailed description
: thereof.
., : ,.
SUMMAR~ OF rmE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the invention, an improved
process or the agglomerating of a dishwashing detergent
containing sodium tripolyphosphate hexahydrate is provided, in~
~ ! cluding the step of~
.~ (a) uniformly distributing an aqueous solution of ~ ~-
..~
`; 25 alkaline detergent salt onto a mixture of
.. l .
:1 constituents including sodium tripolyphosphate,
being mixed in a mixing vessel of predetermined
volume, to uniformly coat the constituents and
essentially hydrate the sodium tripolyphosphate,
j 30 the ratio of the volume of the dry constituents
:: -3-

37
.
charged into the mixing vessel prior to the
distribution of the aqueous solution of al~aline
detergent salt thereon, to the volume of air in
; the vessel, being between 1:2~ and about 1O8;
-and-
(b) mixing the formed agglomerate in the vessel to
ventilate it to the air of the vessel.
According to another aspect of the invention, an
improved process for the agglomeration of a dishwashing detergent,
including sodium tripolyphosphate hexahydrate is provided, in~
cluding the steps of: ~:
(a) charging dry constituents including sodium tripoly- ~ ;
' phosphate, which are to form part of the finished
ayglomerate into a mixing vessel of predetermined :. .
volume for the dry mixing of same~ the ratio of
. the volume of the dry constituents charged into the :
.~ mixing vessel, to the air in the vessel, being :
:~ between about 1:25 and about 1:8; ~.
.
(b) distributing an aqueous solution of alkaline
detergent salt, having an SiO2/Na20 ratio of : :
between 2.4:1 and about 3.25:1, uniformly on the
mixture so as to evenly coat the constituents and
~ essentially hydrate the sodium tripolyphosphate,
- : subsequently addin~ sufficient water if necessary
to complete the hydration; .` ~
~ (c) ventilating the agglomerate produc~; and : ; .
J (d~ subsequently sizing and aging the finished product.
-~ According to another aspect of the invention, a small
amount of water may be distributed uniformly onto the mixing
; 30 dry ingredients, prior to the addition of the aqueous solution of
: 4
:,

5~ 37
alkaline detergent salt to commence the hydration of the sodium
tripolyphosphate.
According to another aspect of the invention, the ~ ;
i vessel of predetermined volume may comprise a horizontally dis-
posed mixing drum, ro~ated about its horizontal axis, during the
agglomerating process.
According to another aspect of the invention, the
formed agglomerate may be aged for at least about 12 hours.
Preferably, the alkaline detergent salt is a sodium
silicate.
Preferably the volume of the dry ingredient to air
ratio is between about 1:18 and about 1:8. ~;
It is preferable that, where a rotating mixing drum
is used, it be disposed horiæontally and the water and alkaline
detergent salt be uniformly sprayed onto the mixture through a
, plurali-ty of nozzles, directed generally downwardly and disposed ;~
in spaced relation on an inlet, disposed on the horizontal axis ; --
of the drum. ~
... .
~l Insofar as the volume ratio between the dry constituents
and air in the vessel is concerned, the larger the ratio, the greater
, the amount of aeration that takes place, thus removing the need for
~ further drying techniques. However, if the ratio is much more
3 -
than about 1:25, a satisfactory product is not produced. Above
this ratio, there is a physical limitation on the size of the ;
mixer available today for use in the formulation of large batches.
~ With smaller batches employing a known mixing vessel, with a
:' :.
ratlo of much more than about 1:25, the ability to spray the
liquid components is greatly impaired. Insufficient powder
surface is presented to the spray of the liquid for uniform coat-
ing with the result that essentially, the wall of the clrum is
....
- -5-
,,..... .: ~;.. ... . : -

coated. ~ 7
If the ratio is much less than about 1:8, a greater
number of large moist amorphous lumps -tend to be produced and the
formulation does not benefit from sufficient aeration to preclu~de
the necessity for additional drying techniques.
Theoretically to completely hydrate the sodium tri-
polyphosphate used in the typical formulations, an amount of
water e~ual to between about 9.2~ and about 11.5% of the
formulation must be added. This water generally comes from the
aqueous solution of alkaline detergent salts.
While this invention reduces "balling" substantially,
still some lumps do result. However, they are both minimal in
size and number and may be crushed according to known procedures.
..
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED PRO OESS OF THE INVENTION
.. . .
In the description of such preferred process,
reference will be made to the schematic drawings, which illustrate
the various steps of such process in diagrammatic form.
Since the percentage composition of the components of
~ the agglomerates form no part of this invention, they will not
'";`! be referred to in the description of the steps of such process.
Exemplary percentages or amounts of the constituents in tested
formulations manufactured according to such process are listed
;` in the examples following.
; In carrying out such preferred process, a modified
Struthers-Wells mixer was used consisting of a hoxizontally
1; disposed rotatable stainless steel drum, a motor to rotate
;:J the drum about its longitudinally disposed horizontal axis,
flight bars located on the inner wall of the drum for mixing
in~redients charged into the drum, a station~ary
longitudinally extending liquid inlet situtate on the axis of
, ~ .
.
. .

37
rotation of the drum, a plurality of spray nozzles secured to the
: inlet in spaced rela-tion and directed downwardly for the uniform
; spraying of a liquid onto the components previously charged into
the drum for the uniform coating thereof.
For grinding and granulating the agglomerate formed
according to such preferred process, a Sto~es granulator was
employed having a fixed steel mesh screen and a plurality of
steel mesh screen engaging fingers for alternately recipxocally
rotating clockwise and counterclockwise through an arc of a
. 10 circle to force feed the agglomerate through the steel mesh
screen.
., .
PREFERRED PROCESS
.:, . .
. I With reerence to the schematic drawings, anhydrous
sodium tripolyphosphate [Na5P3010] and the source of chlorine,
chlorinated trisodium phosphate [4 (Na3P04.11 H20) NaOCl ] in
produced Eorm, were charged inbo the rotating Struthers-Wells
.~ . mixer l, shown in Schematic a through pivotable hopper 2 and .
.~ rotated to thoroughly mix these constituents. ~ ~
... .
II As the mixer continued to rotate:
(a) a small amount of water was sprayed onto the dry
.~ material mixture through the nozzles of the inlet
.,
~: to commence the hydration of the sodium tripoly-
phosphate, seen in Schematic b;
. ~ .
.~?l (b) an a~ueous solution of alkaline detergent salt was
::i uniformly sprayed onto the rotating material for
:?
.-:j the uniform coating thereof, seen in Schematic c;
(c) non-ionic surfactant polyols or other low foam non-
:..,
ionic detergents in solution were added -to the
~ rotating ingredients, seen in Schematic d;
:' 30 . (d) an aqueous solution of alkaline detergent salt was .
-7-
., .

668'7 ~ ~
again uniformly sprayed onto the rotating material
for the uniform coating thereof, seem in Schematic
e;
-and-
(e) a small amount of water was sprayed onto the mix-
; ing ingredients to complete the hydration of the ,
sodium tripolyphosphate and c:lean the inlet and
spray nozzles of the highly v:iscous alkaline
detergent salt solution, seen in Schematic f.
III The drum was rotated for a predetermined time after the
last addition for the ventilation of the agglomerate, seen in
.. . . .
Schematic g.
IV The formed agglomerate was then discharged from the
`' mixer by means of hopper 2 pivoted into position for discharge into
the Stokes granulator for force feeding by the fingers through the
steel mesh screen, seen in Schematic h.
V The agglomerate was then sized according to size, seen
in Schematic i.
(a) the oversized material, larger than 10 mesh was
returned to the mixer for reprocessing as a per
! cent of the initial sodium tripolyphosphate to be
`1 added;
(b) ti) the agglomerate of the desired size (
between 10 mesh and 60 mesh)~was withdrawn;
; 25 (iij subsequently aged for at least 12 hours in
fiber drums at room temperature and pressure,
See Schematic j ;
(iii) and packaged by methods known in the art;
` (c) the undersized, smaller than 60 mesh, was return-
ed to the mixing drum for reprocessing as a per-
~ centage of the sodium tripolyphosphate to be added.
; -8- -~
:.

~ ~35~137 : ~
The following ingredients comprising the indicated
agglomerated dishwashing detergent were charged into the mixing drum
at the indica~ed ~e accordinq to the ~referred ~rocess described above.
EXAMPLE A
.
6,000 pounds of agglomerated dishwasher detergent were manufactur- -
` ed according to the above process. ,~
.
STEPS ING~EiDIENTSAMQUNT STEPS ~--
Correspond to (~bs.) PERFORhMD ~ -
steps outlined ELAPSED ~-
in Preferred TIME
Process (Nearest
Minute)
I Anhydrous Sodium Tri~
polyphosphate 2544 0
.~ .
Chlorinated Trisodium
$ Phosphate 1272 15
.. . .
Ratio Of Volume Of Dry
i Constituents /Volume
Of Air in Mixing Ves~el
1:18
Mixed 24
II (a) Water 43 27
(b) Sodium Silicate
SiO2/Na20 2.4:1 735 28
`, 20 Sodium Silicate '
SiO2/Na20 3.25:1 600 52
~ (c) Pluronics - L62D 120 ) 68
-~ ~Together~ - L61 60 )
c (d) Sodium Silicate
i SiO2/Na20 3.25:1 - 540 78
., .
(e) Water 86 93
$ 25 III Ventilation of Agglomer~
ate 95
IV Discharged 155
, V Aged : About 24 Hours.
. :
EXAMPLE B
12,000 pounds of agglomerated dishwasher detergent were manufactur-
ed according to the above process.
.. _ 9 _
. . ,
r ~, .

~ ~5~l37
STEPS INGREDIENTS AMOUNT STEPS
Correspond To (lbs.) PERFORMED:
Steps Outlined ELAPSED
in Preferred
(Neare~st
Process
Mlnute )
.
I Anhydrous Sodium Tri-5088 0
- 5 polyphosphate
Chlorinated Trisodium
Phosphate 2544 30
Ratio of Volume of Dry
Constituents:Volume of
Air in Mixing Vessel-
1:18
Mixed 48
; 10 II (a) Water 74 53
- (b) Sodium Silicate ~ ;
Si02/Na20 2.4:1 1470 55
' Sodium Silicate
'! Si02/Na20 3.25:1 1200 103
(c) Pluronics L62D 240 136
L61120
(d) Sodium Silicate
2/Na2 3.25:1 1080 156
(e) Water 184 185
III Ventilation of Agglomerate 190
IV Discharged 310
20 V Aged : About 24 Hours.
` Samples were taken of the agglomerated dishwashing
detergents of Examples A and B, after Step III was carried out,
and tested with the following results.
,
FORMULATION
EXAMPLE A EXAMPLE B
~ Available Chlorine 0.69 ~ 0.61
,,,....................................................................... : .
~i Total Actives 2.80 % 2.81 %
.~
Moisture Content 26.4 % 22.8 %
Bulk Density 0.92 gm/cc 0.87 gm/cc
pH of 1% Solution 10.8 10.85 ~ ~
' ' -10- ~ :.
.: ~
. 1 .

56&j~37
Screen Analysis
on 10 mesh screens 1.4 % 0.3 ~ ',
through 60 mesh
Screens 11.9 % 10.3 ~ ,
,,, 5 Samples of other aggomerated dishwashing detergen~.s
~ manufactured according to such process were taken after Step V
', (b) (i) and samples were tested at intervals for moisture and
~ chlorine content. These samples were then aged 24 hours and again ' ~'
~ ~ .
tested for chlorine content.
10 SAMPIE
ELAPSED TIMEMOISTURE CONTENT (%) CHLORINF(~) CHLORINE
-^ ~Minutes)After 24
Hours (%)
~.~
'~, 0 27.18 .83 .81 '
`'I ,:
,10 22.45 .68 .69
~ .
`~ 15 20 ' 24.3 .71 .75
25.9 .79 .77
. ~ ~
,~ 40 26.6 ' .71 ' .72 '~
~ 50 24.6 .71 .71 ~;~
.,j , . .
'i' 60 25.2 .68 ' .66
,~ 20 Because the manufacturing process is an aggIomeration
process, the results are not uniform, due to the non-uniform
., distribution of the ingredients in the agglomerate. However, the
,~
above results show that the chlorinated ~,risodium ~hos-
~ phate does not degradate. Furthermore, there was caking in the
"''' samples tested prior to aging. However, after the agglomerate
~ was aged, no caking of the cons:tituents was observed.
'~ Samples of the aged agglomerate were packaged and
-~ stored for twenty-four hours (Step V(b) (iii)), four boxes were
'~;, opened and the dishwashing detergent was tested for moisture and
chlorine content. The agglomerate from these boxes had not
.::j
,
~ ' ~
:~ll ' ''

lCi S~137
caked and 10wed freely when poured.
: PACXAGED MATERIAL FROM SAMPLE ~:
:
BOX MOISTURE ( %)CHLORINE ( ~ )
1 26.3 .71 :~
2 26.0 .71
3 26.1 . 73 `
4 24.4 .67 '
The extent of hydration of the sodium tripolyphosphate
in the samples, based upon the amount of hexahydrate present, was
determined for each box by X-ray diffraction measurements. The
samples were compared to a sample containing 30~ sodium tripoly-
phosphate, 50% sodium tripolyphosphate hexahydrate and 20%
chlorinated tripolyphosphate. The results are set out below.
BOX % HEXAHYDRATE OF FINAL AGGLOMERATE
1 48.5 :~
,,
~ 2 56.0 ~-~
,2 3 56.0
:, ,
?~ 4 53.0 . .
As a result of the above tests, it was determined that
'. 20 substantial hydration of the anhydrous sodium tripolyphosphate
used in the samples had taken place.
-1 As a final test, packages of detergent manufactured
; according to such preferred process were given to various house- ~;
-i holds for use in their dishwashers and the comments of the members `
f the households were requested. All commented favourably on
the product.
As many changes could be made in carrying out the
j invention without departing from the scope thereof, it is intended
:~2 that all matter contained within the description of such
, .
preferred process and the general comments related thereto shall
-12-

5~6~37
be interpreted as illustrative of the invention and should not be
', interpreted in a limiting sense.
; ~ .'.
', : '
~ 5 . :
," ~ ~ ~
,~:
. . , ~
"~ 10 .~
,~, , '
,"
.~: 15 ::
.' 20
:
~.::1
,',
.'`d
:'',' ' , :
j 25 . ~ ~
:,~ :
,~ . : ,~:
;- ~ . ~ .
: ~
:,, . :
`~ 30
, ~ .
,1

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1056687 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1996-06-19
Grant by Issuance 1979-06-19

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CONN CHEM LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
GUNTER H. BERK
JOHN K. IRVINE
MICHAEL D. MITCHELL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1994-04-22 1 38
Claims 1994-04-22 9 336
Cover Page 1994-04-22 1 25
Drawings 1994-04-22 1 33
Descriptions 1994-04-22 13 534