Language selection

Search

Patent 1062448 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1062448
(21) Application Number: 1062448
(54) English Title: SPACER FLUID FOR SPACING DRILLING MUDS AND CEMENT AND METHODS OF THEIR USE
(54) French Title: SEPARATEUR FLUIDE POUR SEPARER LES BOUES ET LE CIMENT DE FORAGE, ET MODE D'EMPLOI
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract


Abstract of the Disclosure
A spacer fluid emulsion comprising approximately equal
volume parts of a hydrocarbon oil and fresh water, and con-
taining from about 15 pounds per barrel to about 40 pounds
per barrel of an emulsifier, about 0.5 pounds per barrel to
about 10 pounds per barrel of a strong surfactant-dispersant,
and a weighting material in an amount effective to impart a
density to the spacer fluid of from about 8 pounds per gallon
to about 20 pounds per gallon. The emulsifier used comprises
an oleyl amide, preferably in admixture with oleic acid and
dimerized oleic acid, adsorbed on a solid carrier selected
from the group consisting of lime, as herein defined, and
diatomaceous earth. The surfactant-dispersant preferably
comprises a mixture of about equal weight parts of waste
sulfite liquor, and the reaction product derived from the
reaction of oleyl chloride and n-methyltaurine. The invention
is further directed to methods of using such spacer fluids
between cement and drilling fluids during well completions.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property
or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:-
1. A water-in-oil emulsion spacer fluid composition
comprising:
from about 40 to about 60 parts by volume of a
hydrocarbon oil, from about 40 to about 60 parts by volume
of fresh water having, before inclusion in the spacer fluid
composition, a dissolved chloride salts content of less than
1000 parts per million and a total hardness of less than 500
parts per million;
from about 15 pounds per barrel to about 40 pounds
per barrel of an emulsifier composition comprising:
from about 55 weight percent to about 78 weight
percent of a solid particulate carrier material selected from
the group consisting of lime and diatomaceous earth; and
from about 1 weight percent to about 20 weight
percent of a first oleyl amide containing from about 16 to
about 22 carbon atoms, and adsorbed on the surface of the
solid particulate carrier material; and
from about 0.5 pounds per barrel to about 10 pounds
per barrel of a sulfonated-dispersant composition selected
from the group consisting of sulfonated paraffins, resin acids,
resin soaps, mixtures of a sulfonated lignin with a second
oleyl amide different from said first oleyl amide, and mixtures
thereof.
31

2. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 1,
wherein said emulsifier composition is further characterized
in including up to 30 weight percent dimerized oleic acid;
and
said spacer fluid emulsion composition is further
characterized in including a weighting material in an amount
effective to impart a weight of from about 8 pounds per
gallon to about 20 pounds per gallon to the spacer fluid
emulsion composition.
3. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 1,
wherein said emulsifier composition is further characterized
in including from about 3 weight percent to about 15 weight
percent of oleic acid.
4. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 1,
wherein said spacer fluid composition is further characterized
in including from about 1 weight percent to about 20 weight
percent of a particulated asphalt resin, based on the total
weight of the emulsifier composition included in the spacer
fluid composition.
32

5. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 1,
wherein said spacer fluid composition contains from about 45
to about 55 parts by volume oil, and from about 45 to about
55 parts by volume of fresh water.
6. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 1, 2
or 3, wherein said first oleyl amide is derived from the
reaction of a fatty acid containing from 12 to 18 carbon atoms
with an amine and said second oleyl amide is derived from the
reaction product of oleyl chloride with an amino sulfonic acid
containing from 2 to 5 carbon atoms.
7. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 1,
wherein said first oleyl amide is an oleyl amide produced by
condensing oleic acid with diethanolamine.
8. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 1,
2 or 3, wherein said surfactant-dispersant composition comprises
substantially equal weight parts of waste sulfite liquor and an
oleyl amide derived from the reaction of oleyl chloride with n-
methyltaurine.
9. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 1, 2
or 4, wherein said emulsifier composition contains from about
5 weight percent to about 15 weight percent oleic acid.
10. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 1, 2
or 3, wherein the hydrocarbon oil is diesel oil.
11. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 3,
wherein said oleic acid is undistilled oleic acid, and said
emulsifier composition is further characterized in including
red oil.
33

12. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 7,
wherein said emulsifier composition contains from about 65
to about 70 weight percent of calcium hydroxide as the lime
component thereof, and from about 3 weight percent to about
10 weight percent of said first oleyl amide.
13. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 2,
wherein said emulsifier composition is further characterized
in including from about 3 weight percent to about 15 weight
percent of oleic acid.
14. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 12,
wherein said spacer fluid composition contains from about 45
to about 55 parts by volume of oil and from about 45 to about
55 parts by volume of fresh water.
15. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 13,
wherein said first oleyl amide is an oleyl amide produced by
condensing oleic acid with diethanolamine.
16. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 14,
wherein said emulsifier composition contains about 68.1 weight
percent calcium hydroxide, about 4.9 weight percent of said
first oleyl amide and about 10 weight percent dimerized oleic
acid.
17. A spacer fluid composition as defined in claim 14,
wherein said oil is diesel oil and is present in said spacer
fluid composition in a volume substantially equal to the
volume of fresh water included therein.
18. A method for enhancing the completion of cased bore
holes drilled into the earth using drilling mud comprising:
34

preparing a water-in-oil emulsion spacer fluid
containing from about 40 to about 60 parts by volume of a
hydrocarbon oil and from about 40 to about 60 parts by volume
of fresh water, and further containing from about 15 to about
40 pounds per barrel of an emulsifier composition comprising
from about 55 weight percent to about 78 weight
percent of a solid particulate carrier material selected from
the group consisting of lime and diatomaceous earth; and
from about 1 weight percent to about 20 weight
percent of a first oleyl amide containing from about 16 to
about 22 carbon atoms, and adsorbed on the surface of the solid
particulate carrier material;
incorporating in the spacer fluid, an effective
amount of a viscosity increasing agent and from about 0.5
to about 10 pounds per barrel of a surfactant-dispersant
composition to facilitate addition to the spacer fluid of the
hereinafter described quantity of weight material, said
surfactant-dispersant composition being selected from the group
consisting of sulfonated paraffins, resin acids, resin soaps,
mixtures of a sulfonated lignin with a second oleyl amide
different from said first oleyl amide and mixtures thereof,
selecting a cementing composition for cementing a
casing in the bore hole by placement of the cement in the
annulus around the casing;
adding weighting material to said spacer fluid in a
quantity sufficient to impart a weight to the spacer fluid
which does not exceed the weight of said cementing composition,
and is not less than the weight of the drilling mud used in
drilling the bore hole;
circulating into said annulus in an upward direction
in the bore hole and behind drilling mud in the annulus to

displace the drilling mud, a quantity of said spacer fluid,
followed by a quantity of said cementing composition, so that
said spacer fluid is interposed between the cementing composition
and drilling mud over a sufficient interval to prevent
any intermixing of the cementing composition and drilling mud.
19. The method defined in claim 18, wherein from about
30 to about 50 barrels of said spacer fluid are interposed
between the drilling mud and cementing composition.
20. The method defined in claim 18, wherein said first
oleyl amide comprises an oleyl amide derived from the
condensation of oleic acid with diethanolamine, and wherein
said solid particulate carrier is calcium hydroxide.
21, The method defined in claim 20, wherein said
viscosity increasing agent is dimerized oleic acid, and said
surfactant-dispersant is a mixture of substantially equal
weight parts of waste sulfite liquor and a reaction product
of oleyl chloride with n-methyltaurine.
22. The method defined in claim 18, wherein said
surfactant-dispersant comprises a mixture of waste sulfite
liquor and said second oleyl amide.
23. The method defined in claim 18, 19 or 21, wherein
said viscosity increasing agent is present in an amount
effective to impart a density to the spacer fluid of from
about 8 pounds per gallon to about 20 pounds per gallon.
36

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~L~36Z448
This invention relates to a water-in-oil emulsion spacer
fluid composition and a method of enhancing the completion of -~
cased bore holes drilled into the earth using drillingmuds.
Problems associated with the cementing o~ well casings
and deep liners in a well bore have confronted the oil and gas
industry for many years without optimum solution. Generally,
after completion of drilling of the bore hole, the dril~ing mud
employed is displaced by the cement to be employed in cementing
the casing. The compositions and properties of drilling mud
and cements have varied widely, with the result that the inter-
facial contact between the displacing cement and an incompatible
drilling fluid has often resulted in severely detrimental physical
and chemical interactions which are the gene~is of many of the
problems encountered.
For example, where a high viscosity, high density
drilling fluid is u~ed, the described incompatibility can con- ~f~ . ;~' .
tribute to failure to obtain a satisfactory bond between the
cement and the bore hole. Where a water based drilling fluid is `,~
in use, adequate removal of the mud and mud cake from the bore
hole i9 difficult~ When oil based (invert) drilling fluids are ;`
i.~ .,
used, the incompatibility often results in contamination or i~
intermingling of the mud with the cement, and of the cement with ~ ;
the mud. Extreme viscosities of the mud often arise from such
commingling, cau~ing surge pressures and pumping problems.
,
In some cases this leads to undes1rable formation breahdown.
When the olids are commingled with the cement, premature setting
o the cement i~ oten induced and, conversely, when drilling
fluids are contaminated with solids from the cement slurry, the
properties advantageously characteristic of drilling fluids are
adversely affected. For example, drilling fluids of the invert
emul~ion type (oil base) can be caused to have the emulsion
broken, giving higher viscositie~ and higher pump requirements.
;,
~, - 2 - ~ `
,', ~ '~.

06; :4~8
Becau~e of the described difficulties which arise from
direct displacement of drilling fluid~ with cements in the
utilization of drilling mud slurries and oil well cements when
completing and cementing a well, it has become a frequent
practice to undertake to separate these two incompatible slurries
by positioning a spacer fluid therebetween. Many different types
of spacer fluids have been utilized, and in some instances,
several types o~ spacer fluids are used in a single system for
one displacement job. This requires a considerable amount of
expensive equipment and specialized handling personnel. Various `
types of oleaginous materials have been used for spacer fluids
b~tween cement and oil base muds. Such spacer oils do not allow
the cement to adequately hydrate, and the oil thins the mud.
Further, the oil spacer cannot be weighted up to match the ;;~
density of the mud in order to effect efficient removal thereof.
Moreover, the inability to weight any of the oil type spacer
fluids causes underbalance of the hydrostatic column in the
annulu3 of the well. Generally, it is desirable and advantageous
to have the spacer fluid slightly heavier than the mud that it is
displacing, and the cement slightly heavier than the spacer ~luid,
and this is very difficult to achieve with many types of spacer
fluids which have been used.
In view of the persistence of the described problQms,
one or more of which may be encountered when it is attempted to
use any one of the spacer fluids heretofore proposed, a serious
need continues to exist for a ~ingle, univer~al spacer fluid
that can be employed effectively between any types of mud and
cement ~lurries. Ideally, such univer~al spacer fluid could pre-
ferably be employed without ~ignificant alteration in the ;
j 30 rheological properties of the drilling mud or cement; and without
i, :
, changing the pumping time required on the cement slurries in use.
.', ''" ' ' ' .
,, , ~ . .
. .:

~ ~1)62441~ `
.
By the pre~ent invention, improved, substantially
universal spacer fluid~ are provided having excellent temperature
and pressure stability, and effectively capa~le of spacing cements
from substantially all mud systems employed in the drilling of ;~
oil and gas wells. Thus, the spacer fluids of the invention are
compatible with water base mud 3ystem~ of the ferro-chrome ligno-
sulfonate and polymeric types, and are also compatible with
oil base mud systems in all the weight ranges over which such
~ystems are customarily used. In different terms, the slurry ~ ;
of the in~ention is compatible with substantially all oil-in- ~-
water emulsions, as well as all water-in-oil emulsions. Spacer
; ~ . .
fluids of the invention are compatible with the types of cements
commonly in use for oil well cementing, and do not increase their
visco~ities or change the pumping times required.
It should al3~ be pointed out that while the major
and most frequent use of the slurries of the invention is as
a spacer fluid between aements and drilling mud~, the spacer
f~uids of the invention can also be used between any two drilling
muds where one is being displaced by the other. The spacer
. ~ .
~20 fluids contemplated by the invention can be weighted to any '~
;~
I desired density over a wide range, and can be easily tailored
`~ to have a density between the density of the drilling fluid r~
and the den~ity of the cement slurry in the system in which the
spacer fluid i9 to function.
The spacer fluids of the invention are basically fresh
water-in-oil emulsions containing approximately equal volume
parts of a hydrocarbon oil and water, and further containing
from about 15 pounds per barrel to about 40 pounds per barrel
of an emulsifier, about 0.5 pounds per barrel to about 10
pounds per barrel of a strong surfactant-dispersant, and, in
,j ;,
most usages, a weighting material in an amount effective to
: ' !
., - .
~ _ 4 -
'',:,. ,, ~.:

- 1062~413
impart a density to the spacer fluid of from about 8 pounds
pex gallon to about 20 pounds per gallon. `
In another aspect of the invention there is provided
a method for enhancing the completion of cased bore holes
drilled into the earth using drilling mud which comprises pre-
paring a water-in-oil emul~ion spac~r fluid containing approxi-
mately equal amounts of hydrocarbon oil and fresh water and
further containing the emulsifier, incorporating the surfactant-
dispersant, and preferably a viscosity increasing agent in .:
the spacer fluid: selecting a cementing composition for cement-
ing a casing in the bore hole by placement of the cement in the .
annulus around the casing, preferably adding the weighting ~:
material to the spacer fluid in a quantity sufficient to :
impart a weight to the spacer fluid which does not exceed the
weight of said cem~nting composition, and is not less than the
weight of the drilling mud used in drilling the bore hole,
circulating into the annulus in an upward direction in the bore `.`.
hole and behind drilling mud in the annulus to displace the ;.
drilling mud, a quantity of said spacer fluid, followed by ~ `
: 20 quantity of 3aid cementing composition, so that said spacer `.`
: fluid is interposed between the cementing compositiorl and
drilling mud over a ~ufficient interval to prevent any inter- :
: .
mixing of the cementing Composition and drilling mud.
Turning to a more speciflc de3cription of the ~everal
,,
;. :,: ::
~`'.':
" ' '
~'' ".'.
'i, ' '.
- 5 - ::
';'':~
.

~L0624~8
., . ., - ~
,~j, . ..
.- :
components of the spacer ~luids of the invention, and of the
manner in which such fluids are preferably formulated, the `
water utilized in the spacer fluid is fresh water. This term
- is used in contrast to water having a high dissolved inorganic ,;
5; salts content, and particularly a significant content of
;~ chloride salts. The fresh water of the invention can be de~
fined as water having an overall dissolved chloride salts ~
content of less;than about 1000 ppm, and a total hardness of ~; ;
less than 500 ppm. -;~
;10 The oil utilized in preparing the emulsion is a hydro-
carbon oil which can conveniently be diesel oil, crude oil,
kerosene and various other hydrocarbons or mixtures or hydro-
carbons. Diesel oil constitutes the presently preferred oil
compo~n~
The oil and fresh water are utilized in the spacer fluids
of the invention in volume ratios of from about 40.60 to about
60:40 oil to water. Preerably, from about 45 parts by volume
~;~ to about 55 parts by volume of oil are combined with from
about 55 to abQut 45 parts by volume of water. In general, the ,,~r,, j
most suitable spacer composition for most uses will contain
about equal volumes of water and oil. In any case, the spacer
1uid will be a relatively weak (balanced) water-in-oil ~invert)
emulsipn. In other words, the interfacial tension forces in
~ the emulsion are balanced so that the emulsion can easily ~;0
j 25 flip and become an oil-in-water emulsion to maintain .
: , ' ~ .',',.'''.':,
: ' , :', '
6~
'
.
1, ' . ' ' ,' .': . '

~062448
...
compatibility with a water base mud when it is used adjacent
such drilling muds. The "balance" of the spacer fluid
emulsions of the invention is an important factor in per-
mitting them to be compatible with substantially all drilling
S muds and cements currently in use.
I Where the amount of oil used in the spacer fluid ex~
- ceeds a volume ratio to water of about 1.5:1, we have ob~
; ser~ed that the cement adjace~t the spacer undergoes an
- undesirable reduction in setting time. Where the ratio drops
below about 1:1.5, the ability to maintain the continuity o~
the oil phase is lost, and the fluid becomes an oil-in-water
emulsion. The ability to vary the oil-to-water ratio within
the specified range imparts greater flexibility to the
. , . .
selective tailoring or the viscosity an~ weight o~ the spacer
fluid. In this regard, it should be understood that as the
~` ~ term weight is used in this~application and in the claims, ~i
o~her than where the terminology weight percent or parts by
weight is being employed, it is used as a term o~ art re-
l~ ferring in actuality to a density parameter, usually ex-
pressed in either pounds per barrel, or pounds per gallon.
The emulsifiers utilized in the spacer fluid of the ,~
invention are comprised basically of an oleyl amide absorbed
I on a particulated solid carrier material which is selected from
, the group consisting of lime and diatomaceous earth, or mixtures
1 25 thereof. For the purposes of the present application, and as ~-~
- " ';
.:: - .
'I , , . .~ . , .
, _7_
." ~ . ' .:

62~
used in the claims appended to the specification hereinafter,
the term lime i~ defined to include calcium oxide, calcium
hydroxide, magne~ium oxide or mixtures of these compounds.
The term emul~ifier a~ u~ed herein also is used in a special-
ized sense as including both the solid particulate carrier
material and all the particulate materials adsorbed on the
~urface thereof, even though only one or a few of the latter
material~ may function as an emulsifier per se.
The oleyl amide employed in the emulsifier i~ absorbed
on the ~urface of the particulate substrate carrier material
in an amount ranging from about 1 weight percent to about 20
,
weight percent, ba~ed on the total weight of emulsifier used
in the spacer fluid. Preferably, from about ~ to about 10
weight perce~t of the oleyl amide is employed, with the most
desirable amount of this compound most frequen~ly utiliæed
in the emulsifier being about 4.9 weight percent.
The oleyl amide here referred to is con~idered the
primary emul3ifying component in the composition of the in~
vention, and preferably is derived from reacting a fatty acid
containing from 12 to 18 carbon atom~ with an amine. The
amide reaction product preferably con~ains from about 16 to i
about 22 carbon atoms, and from one to two amide groups. The
mo9t preferred single oleyl amide i9 that which i9 prepared
by condensing oleic acid with diethanolamine.
The oleyl amlde con~tituting the principle cor,ponent of
' "'
, . ~',.
'., ,` .
'
~ - 8 -

~o~z4~
the emulsifier used in the spacer fluid of the invention
functioni~ to reduce the interfacial tension between the oil ~
and water constituting the principle components of the ;
~pacer fluid emulsions, 50 that when the mixture is agitated,
a water-in-oil emulsion is readily produced, and its stability
is maintained over satisfactory periods of time. When less
than about 1 weight percent of the oleyl amide i9 employed,
an unsatisfactory reduction of the interfacial tenslon
re~ults, and it is difficult to obtain complete emulisifi-
10 cation of the spacer fluid composition. The addition of
amounts of oleyl amide exceeding 20 weight percent of the
total weight of the emulsifier, in addition to being un-
economic, creates an exce~sive dispersion of the internal
water phaise in the continuous oil phase of the emulsion. ;
In addition to the oleyl amide, the emulsifiers used i
in the spacer fluid of the present i~vention preferably
also include dimerized oleic acid adsorbed on the parti-
! culate substrate~material, and present in an amount of up to ` ;
~; about 30 weight percent of the to~al weight of the emulsifier.
} ~20 Preferably, from about~5 weight percent to about lS weight
percent is used. The dimerized oleic acid, when employed,
; function3 to increase the viscosity of the spacer fluid,
. .: .. .
J enabling it to be weighted with a variety ~f conventional ;~ `
weighting materials; such as barium ~ulfate, calcium carbonate, ~ ~
l~ iron oxides, lead sulfides and cement solids, for selective ~ ;
',
"~',
,'. : ';'~ .
'. , ' :
., ~, .
.~ ~, . .
~ ' ' . .,,:
,, : ''.
:, _ g ~
. , .

!, ; ;: ~ .
," :
; ~ . ,' ' ' ' '',
.. . , .' ' ,. ,;' ' '
..
1()6Z448
.
. . `,
,..^ ..
! ' '' ' ~
adjustme~ of the weight tdensity) of the spacer over a wide, .
range. When concentrations greater than about 30 weight per- 1;
cent of the dimerized acid are utilized in the emulsifier, t"
the spacer fluid becomes undesirably thick and its viscosity
S increases pump;ng requirements to an undesirable lev~l. For iir;
most wei~hted spacer fluid applications, an amount o~ about ,t,,"
lO weigh~ percent has been found to be optimum.
,'! . :,
It should be pointed out that in relatively low tempera- ~
ture environments of usage, and on occasions when very little ~i
or no we~ighting material is to be added to the spacex fluid,
the dimerized oleic acid can be omitted from the emulsifier ;
:; ,
composition. These occasions are relatively rare, howevex, ~
~ , . . . . .
; ~ and in most instances, the dimerized acid will preferably be
utillæé~
15 ~ Of }esser importance for inclusion in the emulsiier used '
in the~spacer ~luids of the invention, but imparting some de-
sirable properties thereto, is oleic acid. Where oleic acid
is employed, i~ is utilized in a range of from about 3 weight
percent to abou~ 15 weight percent of the total weight of the `~
emulsi~ier. Pre~erably, from about 3 weight percent to about
lO weig;ht percent of the oleic acid is used. The most suitable
amount ïS. a~out 5 weight percent~ The addition of this
. . .: . .
materiaI helps ~o stabilize the spacer fluid emulsion against ;i
t~
breaking upon ~ontact with salt containing subterranean
~aters, and particularly high brine content connate waters. ;;
- . : ' , , ;~?r:
:'.;;~
-10~
~ ~ ,' . ;
~ - , '' " ' ' ' ' . ' ' . ',' ' '
:. ': ' ' ~ , . ' . '~

:1062448
It is also a very useful additive where the cement in use
contain~ significant quantities of sodium chloride.
It should be pointed out that where oleic acid is in-
cluded in the emulsifier composition, economic considerations
will frequently dictate the use of undistilled dark oleic ;~
acid in admixture with red oil, rather than pure oleic acid.
The undistilled dark oleic acid contains about 75% oleic
acid, and lesser amounts of linoleic, linoIenic, palmitoleic,
.
palmitic, myristic, myristoleic and stearic acids. The red
..
oil component of such undistilled dark oleic acid mixture ~ ;
is the residue which is produced in a conventional oleic acid
~":
distillation process, and contains the de~cribed oleic acid,
: " .. ..
a~ well as qu~ntitie~ of the other acids mentioned above,
including a minor amount of some dimerized acids~
An emulsifier which has been found to be particularly
efféctive in the spacer fluids of the invention is comprised
,. .
of powdered slaked lime pre~ent in the emulsifier composition
.
in an amount in the range of from about 55 weight percent to
about 78 weight percent, and having, as the other components
of the emulsifier~adAorbed on the~surface thereof, oleyl
amide, derived from the condensation of oleic acid with di-
ethanolamine, in an amount in the range of from about 3
weight percent to about 10 weight percent and dimerized oleic
acid persent in an amount in the range of from about 8 weight
percent to about I2 weigjht percent. ~ -
,, ~ ...
.~ :,,
,
, . :'"',',
,: .
,, A '
,. "' ''~' ' .
~',: ', ' '
'~ -- 1 1 -- ' .' ' ' ' '
ii r, ,:. .'
. -.

~ \
~6Z44~ , -
..
. ;;, ., "
'The most preferred single emulsifier composition for
use in the s~acer fluids of the Invention consists essentialfly ''
, ' of powdere~ slaked lime in an amount of about 68.1 weight
!~ percentt about 4.9 -weight percent oleyl amide, undistilled ' ''I 5 olçic ac}a ~resent in an amount of about S weight percent~ ~' red oil present in an amount of about 5 weight percent, and
undistilIe* dimerized oleic acid present in an amount of ~ ;
about 10 weIght percent. `
i In or*'er~ in some usages of the spacer fluids, to impart ,`
f lQ fluid loss control to the spacer fluids, it will occasionally ''
l~ be desirab~e to include in the composition, in addition to `'
i the emulsif'ier describedj a conventional particulated'solid
asphaltic resin which is added to the spacer fluid composi- ''
~¦ ' tion in an amount in the range of from abou~ 1 weight percent
' 15 to about 2'0! weight percent, based on the weight of the ' '
' emulsifier added. Usually, from about 10 to about 14 pèrcent
; ' of an asphaItic resin will provide adequate fluid loss control ;~'
?
on the infrequent occasions when this is a problem in the use' 3
of the spacer fluids of the invention. Suitable asphaltic
resins includ'e those which have a melting point between 250F ' '
. .; .
and 40QF. 'They may be kettle bottoms, air blown resins or '~;
l~ naturally~ occurring resins. Where such asphaltic resins are '~
used, as Ittle as about 55 weight percent'of the lime carrier
can be utilized. '
~n ad'd'ition to the emulsifier incorporated in the spacer ~'~
f~ ~
~ ~ ' , '' , ",. `., .

10624~8 : `: . . .. ;
,, ,
fluid of the invention, ana constituted as described abQve,
the spacer. fluid ~urther includes a strong surfactant-aispersa~t
material This co~ponènt of the spacer fluid composi~ion .~;
functions to ~isperse and suspend particulated solid weightins .
materials in the spacer when such are utilized, and also
functions ~o prevent solid components which may enter the i! .
spacer ~luid om either the drilling mud or the cement, . ... :.`
between which it is positioned, from breaking or detrimentally
af~ecti~g the emulsion. A variety of surfactant-dispersan~s
can be used, including sulfonated paraffins, resin acids and
resin soaps (such as disproportionated resin acias derived
from the~ettle bottoms produced in the distillation of tall~
oils, and.the soaps vf such acids), and also mixtures of
sulfonated` lignin with certain particular oleyl amides di~
~: .
fering n.the manner hereinafter described from the oleyl . ~.
amides included in the emulsifier. Such dispersing agen~s are
incorporated in the spacer f1uid iD an amount fxom about 0~5 .
~. : to about 10 pounds per barrel. Preferably, the amount of the
:~ surfactant-dispersant utilized is from about 2 pounds per ~:.
:20 barrel t~ about 8 pounds per barrel. When the most pre~erred . . .
: . ., ~ ;::: .
surfac~an.t-dispersant, hereinafter described, is employed, the
amount utilized in the spacer fluid is most suitably about 4 ~.
pounds per barrel. ;.
T~.e pre~erred sur~actant-dispersant compositions are
those constituted by mixing a sulfonated lignin, such as waste
.: .
~;
: ~ ; . : , , ' '
..,.::
. , ,;
` -13-
; .
.: ,

1~6Z4~ :
sulfite liquors, with an oleyl amide derived from the reaction
of oleyl chloride with an amino ~ulfonic acid containing from
2 to 5 carbon atoms. A surfactant-dispersant which has been
found to be particularly suitable and highly effective in the
spacer fluid compositions, and which constitutes the preferred
dispersing agent for use in accordance with the present in-
vention, is a product prepared by reacting oleyl chloride with
n-methyltaurine, and then mixing this reaction product,
constituting an oleyl amide, with waste sulfite liquor in an
amount in the range of from about 25 weight percent to about
75 weight percent of the sulfite liquor-oleyl amide mixture.
Most suitably, the oleyl amide reaction product and the sulfite
liquor are mixed in substantially equal am~unts. The mixture
as thus formed is spray dried to form a solid, particulate
composition. The term "waste sulfite liquor" is used herein
to mean the waste liquor containing lignin sulfonates produced
. . . .
in the sulfite paper process or kraft lignins which have been
sul~onated,
In addition to unctioning to disper~e and aid,in sus-
pending solid particles which may enter the spacer fluid from
the adjacent cement slurry, or from the drilling mud spaced there- I
,~1 from, the surfactant-dispersant utilized in the spacer fluid
allows such conventional weighting materials as particulated solid
~ quartz, calcite, barite, iron oxide, etc. to be rapidly dispersed
;' in the water-in-oil emulsion constituting the 9pacer fluid.
;: :
. i
.'', .~ ~
.
,,
:, ,,
:
,

6Z4~8
It has been found that the spacer fluids containing the de- -
scribed components (emulsifier and surfactant-dispersant) are
capable of dispersing and suspending weighting materials in an
amount sufficient to impart a weight of from about 8 pounds per ,~ -
.: .:. . .
gallon to about 20 pounds per gallon to the spacer fluid.
In formulating the spacer fluid emulsion of the inven-
tion, the emulsifier material is first added to the oil, A
., :
fluid loss additive, such as the asphaltic resin hPreinbefore
men~ioned, can~be concurrently or later added, if used. After
the solid emulsifier and fluid loss additive materials, if -~
any, hav~ been added to the hydrocarbon oil, the solids are
; thoroughly dispersed in the oil, and the fresh water is then
~ added to the slurry to form a water-in-oil emulsion. After
...
the emulsion has formed, the previously described amount of
the surfactant-dispersant material is added to complete the
spacer fluid, except for the addition of any weighting
materials which will be used. `
The spacer fluids as thus prepared are weaker emulsions,
in general, than the drilling fluids which they function to `
space from various cement compositions. Since the spacer,
t~ougha water-in-oil emulsion, is closely balanced by the
,. .
use of approximately equal amounts of the dispersed and
continuous phase, "the emulsion canrevertto an oil-in-watex ;;~
emulsion if it contains an excessive quantity of water."
;:
In other word9, in the event that a water based drilling mud
. ., .:
:. ::
:; .. ' '
;
~ . . .
~' ;~''"
.~ .
- 15 - ~
. . ..
' ~:

1~6244~ - `
-, .
'. .
is being employed, water from the drilling mud will tend to
overload the water phase in the spacer fluid, causing it to
revert, and become an oil-in-water emulsion. It will thus
maintain its compatibility with the mud, as well as with the
cement. The use of the powerful surfactant-dispersant material
: .:~ , .,
in the spacer fluid permits it to be weighted as may be
desired over a wide range of from about 8 pounds per gallon
to about 20 pounds per gallo~. and ihis ma~erial also
funotions to oil wet any cement solids that may migrate into
~i 10 the spacer fluid from the adjacent cement slurry. Further,
the spacer fluids are compatible with all types of cement
slurries utilized in the cementing of wells upon completion,
and does not increase the viscosity or change the pumping time
of such cements.;
15 ; In use, the spacer fluid of the invention is pumped into
,~ , . : -
a well being completed behind the drilling mud to circulate
the mud out of the well, and is displaced ahead of the cement ~"`
column circulated into the well for cementing purposes. It
will generally be preferred to weight the spacer fluid to a
weight which is slightly heavier than the weight of the
drilling mud that it is displacing, and slightly lighter
than the cement which follows the spacer.
The following examples are presented to further illustrate
and explain the spacer 1uid compositions of the invention, and
the function of certain components thereof. In all of the
-- . .
I ~16- ~
. .
..:
,- ~ . .
~ , ` ' , . :''

: ~ :
10~2448 :::
following examples, reference to the preferred surfactant_
dispersant re~ers to a mixture of equal weight parts of waste
3ulfite liquor and an oleyl amide derived from the reaction
of oleyl chloride with n-methyltaurine.
Example 1
A 21,000 foot well is drilled in a California location,
and has a bottom hole circulating temperature of 310F. In
.
completing the well, the mud used in drilling the well is
. , , .. :
displaced through the annulus between the casing and the well
bore by the use of a spacer fluid interposed between the mud
and the cement following the spacer fluid for purposes of
cementing the casing. The mud employed has a density of 18
pounds per gallon, and is a ligno~ulfonate-containing water
base mud. The cement used is an API Class G cement having a
weight of 14.4 pounds per gallon, and is modified by the
inclusion of small amount~ of sodium chloride, silica flour, ~ ` `
iron oxide and an appropriate retarder.
, . . . .
The spacer~fluid formulated in accordance with the ;;
present invention and used between the cement and mud has a
weight of 18.2 pounds per gallon achieved us~i-ng barium sulfate
as a weighting material. The spacer fluid emulsion contains
water and oil in a 50-S0 volume ratio, and has incorporated
therein, 25 pounds per barrel of an emulsifier which contain~
1 68.1 weight percent of powdered slaked lime having adsorbed on
: , '
its surface, 4.9 weight percent oleyl amide derived from the
~ .
,1 :
, : ' ;': ':
.' :.'~:
,~: ., . :.,
.. . .
/ J '- :
; - 17 -
' .:
., :; . . .

.
~06Z4~8
.
..
condensation of oleie acid with diethanolamine, 5 weight pe~-
cent undist~Iled oleic acid, 5 weight percent red oil, and l;O .. ..
weight percent undistilled dimerized oleic acid. The spacer i
fluid also contains 4 pounds per barrel of the preferred
surfactant-dispersant used in the spacer fluids of the i~ven- `
tion. FinaIly~ the spacer fluid used contains 12 weight
percent o~ an asphaltic resin incorporated to reduce fluid
loss. $
~he mud ~na cement utilized in the California cementing
~.
run ar~ not compatible~. Fifty barrels of the spacer is used
between the mud and cement.
The ¢ritical ~elocities at which the transition fro~
laminar to turbulent flow occurs are measured and evaluated
. .
for the~drïlling mud alone, the spacer fluid alone, a mixture
lS of the spacer fluid and the cement used, and a mixture of $
spacer fl~la and the drilling mud. The temperature at which
the~critical velocity tests are carried out is 200F. The
critical uelocities are measured for various annulus sizes
as determined by the difference in the hole diameter and the
casing outside diameter. The results o these runs are set
forth in Table I~
;' ' , ' , ~.`
- ~ . . . ....
.' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~'
'
ï
- --18-- ~
,
' , ;

:1~62448 :
TABLE I ; ~:
Critical Velocity - Feet per Minute :~
Hole Dia. Minus Casinq 0,D,, Inches .
2 3 4 S 6
Drilling Mud 470 370 320 290 270 250
~ . .- . .
Spacer Fluid 355 230 175 145 125 115 :~
Spacer Fluid ~ 5~O Cement 325 240 205 180 165 150 :
Spacer Fluid ~ 50/O Mud 340 250 210 185 170 155 :
The re~ult~ of the critical velocity m~asurements indicate ;~
that substantially lower critical velocitie~s obtain for mixtures
~ ,. . ,:
~: of the ~pacer fluid with either cement or mud,~than in the case
of the mud alone. There is therefore no detrimental increase
in visco5ity, and a. greater eaqe in achieving turbulent flow
i9 realized where any significant mixing of the spacer fluid ~ :
:. :
with either the mud or the cement occurs.
Example 2
: Certain tests are carried out preliminary to the completion
of a well in East Texas. The well is 9700 ~eet in depth, and ; ~ .
has a bottom hole circulating temperature of 250F. The mud
20 ~ used in~drilling the well: is 14 pound~3 per gallon oil baqe ;: :
: mud, and the API: Class H cement to be u~3ed in completing the
well has à density of 15.8 pounds per gallon. The cement
includes 18 percent _odium chloride, a ~mall amount of a ,:
~: ommeraially available friction reducer and a small amount of . .:
retarder.
A ~pacer fluid con~tituted as described in Example 1, but
~: . - . .
: ,.. .
.: ". ~ '
' :
19 - ,

10~2448 ~ ~
.. . . .
` :
.
. . ; .i. ~
;:
w2ighted by the use of barium sulfate to a weight of 14 ' !;
pounds per gallon, is selected for placement between the mua
and cement. To determine the effects on viscosity whlch
might be expected ~o occur as a result of some contamination
f 5 occurring at the interface between the spacer fluid and the
mud, as well as between the spacer fluid and the ~ement, ~-
,.
several tests are conducted with a Fann VSscosimeter, and the
` ?
resuslts of th~se evaluations are set forth in Table II.
TABLE II
~" O~ntamuniation Tests Percent by Volumie Cbnt~N~ation
1 600/300 Fann R~ng 0 10 20 30 40 _s0
MU~ + C~nent 300+/300+300~/276 300+/300+ 300~/300+ 300+/300+ 300~,~300+`
~5ud ~ SFacer Fluid300+/260300~/210 2~5/177 257/152 202/133 204~
`Cement + Spacer Fluid 63/30 59/33 62/3~ 61/38 58/38 56~36 j
he results appearing in ~Sable II show that the viscosities `~
1 . . . . ......................................... . .
developed in the Fann tests for the type of mixing which can
concei~ably occur~at the interface between the spacer flui~ an~ ~;
mud ar~ much lower than those which would occur, w~thout the use
of the spacer, at the interface between the mud and cement.
' .~.
¦ The same is true of the viscosities developed at the interface
1 20 between the spacer ~luid and the cement, assuming varying
..
! amounts of contamination up to a 50-50 volumetric ratio of
contamination.
~'` ` '"" ''' "~,'
l For the purpose of completing a 20,000 foot well drilled
¦~ 2S in Ok~ahoma, and having a bottom hole circulating temperature' - .,;
,. . . .
-20-
., ~ , . . . ~.. ~
;, ~ , ' . . ' '`
.. . , . , ,~
. ', . . .

~ ~062441~ ~
f 300F, a spacer f~uid, constituted as described in Example
1, is made up in accordance with the present invention for
placement between a water base, ferro chrome-lignosulfonate
drilling mud having a density of 10.7 pounds per gallon, and
a cement having a density of 12.8 pounds per gallon. The
spacer fluid is weighted with barium sulfate to a w~ight of
11.5 pounds per gallon. Fann Visco~imeter tests of the type
described in Example 2 are then carried out to examine the~ ;
effects upon the viscosity of the system of the commingling
or intermixing occurring at the interfaces of the spacer
fluid with the cement and with the mud, as compared to the
viscosity effect resulting from intermingling of the mud with
the cement where no spacer fluid is employed. The results are
set f~rth in Table III
TABLE III
Contamination Tests Percent bY Volume Contamination
600/300 Fann Reading20 30 40 50
Mud + Cement 133/82 156/94 182/109 230/135
Mud + Spacer Fluid97/58 97/58 105/60 lOS/60 ;
Cement + Spacer Fluid 33/22 32/2027/17 26/17
Example 4
An 18,000 foot well ha~ing a bottom hole circulating
temperature of 283F drilled in Louisiana, using an oil base
mud having a density of 17.5 pounds per gallon, is to be
completed w~th an API Class ~I cement having a density of 18.1 ~`
pounds per gallon. The cement contains an iron oxide
. .
,.
, ',';
,
,.~
1'',.
, . .
_ 21 -
,

1~6Z448
.
weightin~ agent, silica flour and a small amount of com-
mercially available retarder.
j A spacer fluid is made up for interposition between the g
cement ~nd mud, and has a weight of 'S.8 pounds per gallon
S achievea by weighting with barium sulfate. The spacer flui~
otherwise has the composition of the spacer fluid referred
to in E~ample 1~ Fann Viscosimeter tests are carried ~ut on
,, ~
the spacer fluid in admixture with both the mud and the
cement~ and the results are compared with Fann viscosity
readings ~arried out on ~arious mixtures of cement and mud,
he results are set forth in Table IV.
TABLE IV
~, .
Contaminaticn Tests Percent by Volume Conta~nation600/300 Fann ReadLng 0 10 20 30 40 50~~
1~ . ,
Cbment ~ Mu~ iOO~/21 293/170 300~/250 300t~243 300~/276 300~/303
M~d + Spacer Fluid 129/73 98/58 94/55 90/51 84/48 8L~45
Cbment ~ SpK~r Fluid 224/132 194~116 116/105 155/100. 137/83 157~93
Example S ~ `
P~ur spacer compositions are made up with.each containing
108 ml. of No.~2 diesel oil and an equal volume of water. Each
composition also contains 1.5 pounds per barrel of oleic acid;
1.5 pounds per barrel of oleyl amide (condensation proauct of
oleic acid and aiethanolamine); 1.5 pounds ber barrel of dimer- ,r,
ized oleic a~,id and 525 pounds per b.nrrel of barium sulfate ar ~i
¦ a weighting material. The amounts and kinds of solid carrier ;~
substrate material in the emulsi~ier composition is varied Ln
2~
I ~ ~ , ; , , r' ' '

624~8
the four compositions, a~ is the amount of surfactant-dispersant. .: .`
These variations in composition are as follows: ~ .
Composition A - 20 lbs/bbl of calcium oxide and four lbs/bbl
. of the preferred dispersant-surfactant herein-
before described,
Composition B - same a~ Composition A, but no lime or other
~olid carrier included; -
' ' :
Composition C - same as Composition B, except that five lbs/bbl ~ '
of the preferred dispersant-surfactant are used; ~ :
10 ~ Composition D - same as Composition A, except that two lbs/bbl
: of sodium hydroxide are used inf~tead of the ..
: aalcium hydroxide.
For the purpose of evaluating viscosities and determining
the voltage breakdown characteristics of the spacer fluid
compo~itions, voltage breakdown and Fann Viscosimeter tests :
are conducted on the Compositions A, B and C. Composition D ~ .
doe~ not make an emulsion, indicating that ~odium hydroxide If`~ :
!: : ~ -,
can not be substituted as a carrier:material for tbe calcium --
hydroxide.: The~resuLt~ of the viscosity and voltage breakdown 1. :
~2~0 ~ test~ are set forth:in Table~V.~
.. ~ : :
.:
' ~ , .
, . .
~.:
'1 ' .:
r
, ': `~;' ' '
., ~ .
~i : . ~, ,
- 23 _ ,

1062448
TPBLE V
co~ osition
A B C
.
Apparent Viscosity 95 150+ 150+
600 Fann Reading 190 300+ . 300+
300 Fann Reading 140 300~ 244
Plastic Viscosity 50 ~- --
Yield Point 90
200 Fann Reading 118 286 207
100 Fann Reading 86 227 163 ,~
6 Fann Reading 31 93 69 ~'
3 Fann Reading 27 49 39
Voltage Breakdown: 70 74 34
The results set forth in Table V show that eliminating the solid
~; carrier (CaOH) results in the ~pacer fluid ~Composition B) having
~: a viscosity which is too high for the spacer fluid to be usable.
The addition of 25 percent more surfactant-dispersant to .
Composition C does not adequately lower the,viscosity to correct
: this problem. ,;
` Example 6 ~
~:. To a blend of:l08 ml. of No, 2 diesel oil and 108 ml. of ,:
fresh water, various of the components of'the spacer fluid
composition of the invention are added, except for the oleyl
.
amide of the emulsifier~ Eight compositions are formulated in
: this way, and their voltage breakdown characteristics then
.
~ .
.
'. ., . ' '' .
,: .... .
r ' .:
'.:",~.' "
;'.';. :
'' " ''. ""',
; - 24 - ..
., ~.~.. ~ .

- ~06244~ ~
determined. Table VI shows the constitution o~ the several
compositions and the voltage breakdowns obtained.
TABLE VI
Component Composit on, lbs/bbl
dimerized oleic acid 2.5' 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.5 1.5 3.5 2.5
asphaltenes --- 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 --- ' ,'' -
, dispersant-surfactant ~ 4.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 8.0 ,'
barite --- --- --- 525 ~ -- 525 ---
' . . ,~ ' ":.,
10 ~ Voltage Breakdewn ** 20 12 50 --- 16 0 --- --- ,-'''
*The solid components are here all added together into '~ '
the diesel oil which is then added to the fresh water.
~ **Compositions 4 and 7 are too thick to accept and `',,~ ~,
s,~ allow mixing in of all the barite. In the case of Composition
8, the emulsion breaks during the adding of the,barite. ' ~" '
~. . ..
The poor rei3ults realized when the oleyl amide emuli3ifying ;
agent, used in the emulsifier, and the solid carrier (lime,
etc.) are omitted demonstrate the,importance of the inclusion ,'
~f these components~
3~ 20 ~ Example~7 ,
A' number of composition3 are~prepared each~containing 151
ml. of No~. 2 diese} oil, lSl ml. of fresh water and 110 pounds ',
~ per barrel of 4.23 gravity barite. The other components of the ''
" compositio~ are varied as follows~
.. ~ $, .
' ' ,r';
~ ~ ', . : i
r i
'1 ~ ' ''
~,i .
i . .
? ~.:
~;~ ,' , ,:
.i' ' ,:

~06;~:~48
,~
:,
- _ Compo~ent _ Com~osition, lbs/bbl
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
oleyl ami~e~ 1~5 ~ 1.5 1O5 --- 1.5 1.5
...
dimerized oIeic acid --- 2.5 --~ 2.5 ~.5 2.5 2.5- oleic acia ~ 2.5 ---- 2.52~5 2.5 2~5
friction reducer --~ --- 2.0 -
: ~ *reac~ïon product of oleic acid and diethanolami~e `
**a ~er~vative of dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid
e Fann Viscosimeter and vo}tage breakdown tests prev~ous~y ~:
descri~e~ are carried out on the eight compositions. The resul~s
.
obtained appear in ~able VII.
. .
TABLE VII ;.:
Composition
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 . :
: . 600 Readin~ 40 174 53 175 58 .80 83 77 ~-.
:: 300 Reading 21165: 27 142 31 50 S9 . 57
~ Plastic VIsc. l9 9 .26 33 27 30 24 ~0 '`$
,. ~ . , `~ :
~ Yield Point 2 156 1 109 4 ~0 35 ~7
: , ;;, , . :
200 Reading 15 158 32 122 27 38 48. 47 ;~ :
100 Readin~ 10 137 23 96 14 2S 35 35 `jfi,
6 Reading 3 24 7 37 3 8 13 1~ ;, .
.,.: ~ .
3 Reading : 2 18 5 32 ~ 5 10 & ~. ..
:~ ' ' , . , ;.,:'~,. `
; Voltaye;Breakdown 72 100100 60 62 100 60 2~ :
The~ data in Table VII demonstrate the need for inClusio~ o~
the dimerïzed oleic acid in the composition in order to achie~
.. ..
. , . . : ~,:: .
- : ~
' . ..",.'".
-26~
,. ,~ . .
:,. `- .: .:
' ~ I, ' ', . ", :' .
,. ;~

6;2441!3
adequate weight supporting capacity (yield point of at least : ~ .
8), but further show that when used alone or at a relatively
high concentration, the dimerized acid tendsto increase the
viscosity of the composition to a higher than optimum level. : :
Example 8 :
Ten pounds per barrel of CaO are added to each of the eight
compositions constituted as described in Example 7. Viscosity
and voltage breakdown tests of the thus modified compositions
yield the following results: ~ .
TABLE VIII .
Composltlon ,.
: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :--
600 Reading 42 115 64~145 60 100 80 92
300 Reading 22 82 37 114 35 70 55 67
Plastic Visc. 20 33 27 31 25 30 25 25
~: Yield Point 2 49 10 83 10 40 30 42
200 Reading 15 72 27 95 25 60 45 55
: 100 Reading 9 64 15 73 17 52 22 40
6 Reading 3 11 4 30 5 14 11 14 , ;
:. 3 Reading 2 7 3 24 4 7 9 11
; ~ 20 - Voltage Brea~down 28 80 0 66 60 52 60 40 ~:
The properties of the spacer fluid emulslons are shown ~.:
~ ~: by the data to be:generally improved by the addition of the
: particular calcium oxide. ~.
Example 9 l!`
Nine spacer fluid compositions are prepared each containing ~, .
', ':
.`:
:. " .
,r
.. ~ . .
'~' ' ' :,
~ ,~
~ - 27 -
'`''' '''" '..

- ~o~;z448 ~
. ,~
equal volumes of No. 2 diesel oil and fresh water, and each~
. containin~ four pounds per barrel of the preferrei surfacta~t- ~
dispersant ta mixture of equal weight parts of waste sulfite `-
liquor an~ the methyl taurine derived oleyl amide). The re- ~,
5maining components of the several compositions are varied ~s s
shown in Table IX, which also shows the.density, in pounds ~.
per gallonrof each of the resulting spacer fluids.
TABLE IX . . - ~:
, ~
ComPosition :.
_ ~~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g .
Diesel No~ Z, ml. 153 121 102 153 121 102 153 121 102;~
Fresh Water, ml. 153 121 102 153 121 102 153 121 1~2;. .
: ~. Emulsifier" lbs/bbl25 25 25 20 20 2Q 15 lS 15 .
~ Barite, lbs/bbl 110 375 537 I10 375 S37 110 .375 ~37
i~ : Density, I~s/gal 10 .15 18 10 15 18 10 15 1
- *The emulsifier used has the following composition~
~ Component ~ Weight Percent . ;~
¦ ~alcium oxide . 56 .~ ;
oleyl amide 4 . .;.
oleic acid 10 `
,~ ~ ''i ! '
dimerized oleic acid 10 ~ . . ~;~. :-
3 ~ . d~ spersant-surfactant . 8 . ~.
! .asphaltenes 12
The ~ann Viscosimeter and voltage breakdown values for the .;
compositions are determined, and are set forth in Table X. : :~
. ,: .
~, ~
;, . , . . .. , ' '': :
-28- i~
'. ~ l ' .,,; '
.: ' ,.,

~06Z4~
.. . . .
. TAB~E X ~.
_ Composition
. 1 2- 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ..
600 Reading 100 140 300f 71 146 282 58 112 300
300.Reading 69 85 190 45 88 162 33 61 171
Plastic Visc. 31 55 -- 26 58 120 25 5}
~- Yield Point 38 30~ -- 19 30 42 8 10 ~ `r ' :
. , ~ , .i
200 Reading 55 62 143 34 64 11624 44 12g .:
100 Readin~ 38 36 84 21 38 66 13 24 75 ;J.
6 Reading : :8 . 6 11 3 4 9 2 3 10
3 Reading~ S ~ 4 8 2 3 61.5 2 5 `;`
Voltage Breakdown 200 124160 200 160124 124 80 82 ;i~.
: In the foregoing discussion and description o the invention, . :
certain preerred embodiments o the invention have been de~
scribed, and illustrative examples of the practice of the in~
vention have been:~set orth in order to guide those skilled in.
the art to an understanding of~the basic principles underlying .: -.
the invention. Certain variations in the manner of using the
spacer fluids of the invention will be perceived and well ~.
understood by those skilled in the art, and certain changes in
the character and amount of components herein described, particu- ...
larly in the working examples, will be apparent to those .j .
knowledgeable in the field to which the invention pertains~ It
is there~ore intended that the spirit and scope of the invention,
as based upon the underlying principles herein enunciated, shall ~
: ' ~., :
2 `i'~;

- ~06Z448
be consi~ered to circumscribe and include all such changes Qnd ,~
j innovations as do not depart from the basic principles of the
~, ~ invention~ except as such scope may be necesarily limited by
the app~naed claims or reasonable eqllivalents thereofO ~.
'..
~ 5
~;. . , ,~"
; , , ' . . : . ."'''~ '
~ ' , , ' ' , ' , . ' ' . ".~`::,'' '.
; . . , .;.
i~ ' ~ . ', i ;,
~ 30~
,1: , :.
r! ` - - ~ f
r ;

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1062448 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2011-07-26
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: First IPC derived 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1996-09-18
Grant by Issuance 1979-09-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HALLIBURTON COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1994-04-27 6 284
Abstract 1994-04-27 1 69
Cover Page 1994-04-27 1 29
Drawings 1994-04-27 1 16
Descriptions 1994-04-27 29 1,414