Language selection

Search

Patent 1074976 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1074976
(21) Application Number: 1074976
(54) English Title: METHOD OF PRODUCING STEEL INGOTS FROM UNKILLED STEEL
(54) French Title: PRODUCTION DE BARRES D'ACIER A PARTIR D'ACIER NON CALME
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
In a known process, unkilled steel is cast into an
ingot mould and after a time the remaining liquid contents
are killed by a deoxidising agent and are homogenised by
injection of a gas. The present invention, which makes it
possible to avoid the use of a hot top in such a process
and to improve yields when slab rolling the ingot, proposes
force-cooling and solidifying of the remaining liquid
contents from the upper surface downwards by means of cooling
fluid applied to the upper surfaces after the homogenisation.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY
OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Method of producing steel ingots in which unkilled
steel is cast into an ingot mould in a single casting operation,
and after a period of time the remaining liquid contents of the
mould are fully killed by the addition of deoxidizing agent and
are subsequently subjected to homogenization by injection of a
gas characterized in that the ingot mould is an uncovered mould
and the contents of the mould are, after the said homogenization,
force-cooled and at least partially solidified from the upper
surface of the steel downwards by means of cooling fluid.
2. Method according to Claim 1, characterized in that
the cooling fluid is a liquid directly applied to the upper sur-
face of the steel.
3. Method according to Claim 2, wherein the said homo-
genization is performed for a period of 20 to 30 seconds by the
injection of air from a lance which is introduced downwardly
into the liquid steel to near the bottom of the ingot mould,
and water is thereafter sprayed onto the upper surface of the
steel for a period of 15 to 30 minutes.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~7~971~;
The invention relates to a method of producing steel
ingots, especially ingots which are to be rolled, to ingots so
produced and to rolled steel product made from the ingots.
In a known process for making ingots, unkilled steel
is cast into an ingot mould in one single casting action, and
after a certain period of time the remaining liquid contents of
the ingot mould are fully killed by the addition of deoxidizing
agent and are subsequently homogenized by the injection of a
gas. In Dutch Patent Application No. 70.12060 (corresponding
to British Patent Specification No. 1,304,826) the predecessors
in law of the present applicants suggested a similar method, in
which however, preference was given to a mode of performance in
which the heat flow away from within the central part of the
mould is reduced by applying an i'nsulating layer (a so-called
"hot-top") locally against the inner side of the ingot mould
and/or by sprinkling an insulating powdery substance on top of
the ingot. By these measures it is intended to keep liquid the
upper portion of the ingot as much as possible over the entire
cross section, in order to counteract the formation of a shrin-
kage cavity. The dirt which is present in the top of the ingot
after solidification (also caused by and coming from the hot
top) must be eliminated from the steel when rolled to slabs,
which affects the yield of slabs rolled from the ingot unsatis-
factorily. Also applying heat insulating material to the top
end of the inner surface of the ingot mould, and the sprinkling
of insulating and/or exothermic substance on top of the ingot
both tend further to increase the cost of making the ingot.
It is an object of the invention at least partially to
eliminate the abov ~entioned drawbacks, and particularly to in-
crease the slab yield while reducing the cost.
According to the invention there is provided a methodof producing steel ingots in which unkilled steel is cast into
an ingot mould in a single casting operation, and after a period
-2-

~107497~i
of time the remaining liquid contents of the mould are fully
killed by the addition of deoxidizing agent and are subsequent-
ly subjected to homogenization by injection of a gas in which
method the ingot mould is an uncovered mould and the contents
of the mould are, after the said homogenization, force-cooled
and at least partially solidified from the upper surface of the
steel downwards by means of cooling fluid. sy an "uncovered"
mould we mean a mould in which special measures to reduce heat
loss at the top, for instance provision of a hot top, are not
taken.
Preferably the cooling fluid is a liquid directly
applied to the upper surface of the steel, e.g. by spraying.
With this new method, it has been found possible to
increase the slab yield in a particular application in the ap-
plicant's works from 81% to 86%.
It is remarked that British Specification No. 1,346,987
shows a method in which an ingot mould is filled by pouring in
one single action without using a hot top, and in which also the
top of the ingot is force-cooled. In that case, however, the
amount of deoxidizing substance added is such that only the
steel in the top of the ingot mould is killed, whereas inten-
tionally the steel in the lower part of the ingot mould is kept
unkilled. The deoxidizing substance supplied is not homogenized
through the melt by the injection of a gas, since it is the spe-
cial intention with this known method that the continuing forma-
tion of gas in the lower part of the ingot ensures that the
ingot solidifies with a convex upper surface because of trapped
gas bubbles. A drawback of this known method is that the de-
oxidizing substance is distributed unequally through the ingot,
with the result that upon rolling materials of different quali-
ties are produced from one and the same ingot.
Preferably in the method of the present invention the
said homogenization is performed for a period of 20 to 30 seconds
--3--

107~976
by the injection of air from a lance which is introduced down-
wardly into the liquid steel to near the bottom of the ingot
mould, and water is thereafter sprayed onto the upper surface
of the steel for a period of 15 to 30 minutes.
An important advantage obtainable with the method of
the invention is that, compared to the known method first de-
scribed above, the cast ingot needs substantially less time for
solidifying in the ingot mould. Also it has been found that the
ingot may be placed in the pit furnace while warmer, and also a
shorter time is required in the pit furnace until it has suffi-
ciently equalized in temperature in order that it may be slab
rolled. These factors can result in substantial savings in
investment in ingot moulds and in costs of pit furnace opera-
tion.
The following comparative example illustrates the
invention.
EXAMPLE
A number of ingots of 20 tons steel each were cast and
subsequently slab rolled by the known method first described a-
bove and by a method embcdying the invention respectively. The
tests were performed with a standard low alloy low carbon un-
killed steel.
According to the known method, this steel was cast in
ingot mould provided with a hot top and was caused to rim
against the mould for 4 minutes. Thereupon a sufficient quanti-
ty of aluminium ribbon was injected into the remaining melt in
order to kill it. By bubbling of air from a pipe which was
moved downwardly to near the bottom of the mould the melt was
homogenized for 24 seconds.
It was found that the ingots cast in this manner had
to cool down for 300 minutes in the mould before the moulds
could be stripped. A further cooling period of 30 minutes was
then necessary before the ingots could be placed in the pit

1074976
furnace. Equalization of temperature for 480 minutes in the
pit furnace was found to be necessary in order that the ingots
could be rolled to slabs. After the slab rolling the slab yield
was found to be 81~.
Steel of the same quality was cast in single and un-
interrupted casting operatings into similar ingot moulds, which
however, were not provided with hot tops. The treatment was
similar to that described above with the exception that after
the injection of aluminium ribbon to fully kill the still-molten
contents and the homogenization, water was sprayed onto the up-
per surface of the steel for 20 minutes to force-cool and at
least partially solidify the melt downwardly. This time it was
found that after a "covered" cooling time of 95 minutes the
ingots could be stripped. After a "naked" cooling time of 65
- minutes these ingots could be placed in pit furnaces in which
after 300 minutes they had sufficiently equalized in temperature
to be rolled into slabs. Twenty of such slab rolled ingots were
found to have a slab yield of 86%, as compared with the 81%
yield of the slab rolled ingots produced according to the known
method.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1074976 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1997-04-08
Grant by Issuance 1980-04-08

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
None
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1994-04-04 1 25
Drawings 1994-04-04 1 5
Abstract 1994-04-04 1 15
Descriptions 1994-04-04 4 147