Language selection

Search

Patent 1106872 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1106872
(21) Application Number: 1106872
(54) English Title: DOCUMENT PROTECTION USING COLORS BELOW CRITICAL DENSITY OF COPIER
(54) French Title: PROTECTION DE DOCUMENTS UTILISANT DES COULEURS AU- DESSOUS DE LA DENSITE CRITIQUE DU COPIEUR
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G03G 21/04 (2006.01)
  • B41M 3/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MCELLIGOTT, MICHAEL J. (United States of America)
  • TKALENKO, VICTOR J., JR. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • DATA BUSINESS FORMS LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: R. WILLIAM WRAY & ASSOCIATES
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1981-08-11
(22) Filed Date: 1978-01-12
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
766,590 (United States of America) 1977-02-08

Abstracts

English Abstract


PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR DOCUMENTS
Abstract of the Invention
A system to protect documents such as negotiable
instruments, title instruments and identification documents.
from illegal copying by color copiers and alteration such
as amount or signature particularly computer printout
documents comprising preprinting a "VOID" pattern over the
amount and/or signature area of the document in solvent
insoluble or color change ink. The VOID is printed with
a camouflage pattern overcoating. The camouflage pattern
overcoating may be a pattern or solid coating. It may
be a coating on the undersurface of the Mylar* film overlay
of the "VOID. Thereafter the disclosure contemplates
adhering the Mylar*film to the document to be protected
over the amount and/or signature area with cold pressure.
Color copying by machine is prevented by the use of colors
in the inks which are below the critical density of the
copier, so as to verify the authenticity of a document
and prevent fraudulent use of a copy.
*Trademark


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. A document for deterring nefarious
reproduction comprising:
a substrate,
a background camouflage printed on said
substrate with a density below the reproduction threshold
density which is reproducible on xerographic color
copier, and
a warning mark on the document which appears to the
copier to have a reproduction density which exceeds the
threshold of reproduction and which when viewed by the
human eye is substantially indistinguishable from the
background camouflage.
2, A document according to claim 1 wherein
the cumulative density of the background camouflage and
the warning mark exceed the reproduction level density
limits.
3. A document according to claim 1 wherein
the warning mark which is applied to the document
has a color density exceeding the reproduction level
density limit, while the background camouflage does not
exceed the reproduction density limitation.
4. A document according to claim 3 wherein
the background and warning mark are in overlay registration.
14

5. A document according to claim 2 wherein
the background and warning mark are in overlay registration.
6. A document according to claim 3 wherein
the background and warning mark are in offset registration.
7. A document according to claim 1 wherein
the density limits are .08 ? .01 Cyan, .12 ? .01 Magenta
and .05 ? .01 Yellow.
8. A document according to claim 1 wherein
one or both of the background or warning mark contain
a sympathetic ink which changes color and increases
color density when subjected to erradicature.
9. A document according to claim 1 wherein
a florescent substance is applied with the warning
mark.

10. A document protection system for
safeguarding instruments and documents against fraudulent
alteration of amount and/or signature and/or nefarious
reproduction comprising:
a document bearing on its surface indicia
including an amount and signature and a pattern of
legible data clearly visible to the unaided eye when
the document is tampered with or fraudulently altered,
and
a transparent film member having a camouflage
pattern and an adhesive coating on a surface bonding
with the instrument,
said film being applied to said document under
cold pressure so that the camouflage pattern completely
obscures the pattern of legible data until the film is
disrupted or removed when the data becomes plainly
visible, signifying fraudulent alteration,
said camouflage being of a color applied in
a density below the reproduction density threshold of
a color copier.
11. A system according to claim 10
characterized in that the transparent film is provided
on the side opposite said camouflage pattern with a
coating having a high coefficient of friction relative
to known writing instruments.
16

12. A system according to claim 10 or 11,
characterized in that besides the camouflage pattern
a colorless fluorescent material is provided.
13. A system according to claim 10,
characterized in that the pattern of legible
data is repeated and is carried out in solvent
insoluble ink, and that the transparent film is insoluble
in solvents and that the coating on said film consists
of a silicone resin plus a catalyst.
14. A system according to claim 13,
characterized in that the film is made of
polyester with a thickness of about 0.025 mm
(0.001 inch) and that the silicone resin catalyst
coating is in the order of 0,001 to 0,01 mm
(0.0005 to 0.005 inch) in thickness.
15. A system according to claim 13,
characterized in that the transparent film
is a MYLAR*film which is bonded to the document
by a layer of adhesive material having a thickness of
0,02 to 0,038 mm (0.0008 to 0.0015 inch) and a high
peel strength, aggressive, solvent and heat resistance
as well as pressure sesitivity.
*Trademark.
17

16. A document for deterring nefarious color
reproduction thereof upon a color copier comprising:
a substrate,
a background camouflage printed on the entire area
of said substrate of a first density, and
a warning mark also printed on said substrate of a
second density such that there exists in the
area of said warning mark an area of a third density which
is comulative of said first and second densities, such that
the third density area is reproduced by a color copying
machine, the camouflage and mark being of densities
which are not reproduced by a color copying machine.
17. A document according to Claim 16 wherein one
or both of the background camouflage and the warning mark
contain a sympathetic ink which changes color and increases
color density when subject to eradicature.
18. A document according to Claim 16 wherein a
fluorescent substance is applied with the warning mark.
18

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


7~
ackground of the_Invention
The prior art has developed according to the
references cited in U. S. Patent 3,802,724 i.ssued April 9,
1974 and assigned to the assignee of this application.
Prior art techniques, for the most part, hav.e
been based upon the utilization of competing chemical
formulat.ions which are or may be employed as either an
overlay on the top surface of the document to be
protected or as an overprinted area on such documents or
in some instances as a chemical wash or bath into which
the entire paper stock is emersed and from which the
- document is thereafter preprinted. None of the kn.own
techniques has direct application to computerized
document protection nor are any of the known prior art
lg systems readily adaptable to document protection of
computer printouts as hereinafter described.
Improvements of U. S. Patent 3,802,724 related
to a combined document using a document protection system
for use with high speed data processing equipment such,
for example, as high speed printers, which produce visibly
legible records from a computer, the document being safe-
guarded by a pattern of legible warni.ng data camouflaged
by a pattern applied to a film covering of the warning
date so that if the covering is altered, the warning data
will appear.
; Since the general quality of printing by such
high speed computer prin-touts is usually fairly poor, it
is a relatively easy matter for the document forger or
check alterer to raise~ change OI` remove and add the
amount and/or signature at will. The same is generally
. ~
.. . ... . .

r ~ 8~J 2
true for the average typewritten document, check, etc.
The printing on these materials is generally so inferior
that alteration by hand of -the amount or signature is
accomplished with ease and efficiency by the individual.
.. .
The system contemplated in U. S. Patent 3,802,724
employs a high tensile strength, transparent material which
i9 pre-cut in the form of a tape which i9 or may be produced
in a relatively large roll. The transparent material is
required to have a friction coefficient sufficient to
avoid marking by known means such, for example, as ball
point pens, crayons, wax pencils, and the like. The tape
i9 provided with a lightly colored camouflage pattern
on one surface which is overcoated with a highly aggressive,
pressure-sensitive, adhesive coating. The opposite surface
of the transparent tape is coated with a curable colorless
silicone resin. The document to which the pressure
sensitized tape i9 to be applied is or may be provided
with a lightly colored, so-called VOID pattern of repeating
symbology such, for example, as the word "void", "fraud",
"cancelled" or some similar designation. Thereafter the
tape with the camouflage protective coating is adhesively
secured over the area containing the void pattern, thus
masking the "void-" pattern from the eye while permitting
any more darkly colored, printed indicia such, for example,
as the number amount in the case of a check or the signature
of the payer of the document to be visibly discernable
through the tape. The document thus protected cannot be
written upon in a protected area with the generally
available writing instruments due to the slipperiness of
the exposed surface provided by the invention. Attempts
..... .. .. . .

372
at complele or ~al~tia' removal of the applied tape res~llt
in damage to the document, e.g. tearing, mutilitation,
holes in the protected area, etc.
Since the advent of quality color xerographic
copiers t such as the Xero~*L-6500 color copier, copies
of documents have posed an ever increasing problem.
The very effective system disclosed-in U. S.
Patent 3,802,724 can be thwarted by making a color copy
of the original and then altering the amount.
In addition, because the systems of color copying
are so effective, criminals having àccess to them may
effectively duplicate negotiable bonds, vehicle registrations
and title to match them to the stolen vehicle, pe~sonal
identification documents, and other like documents. As
the copiér systems proliferate, so does their usage and
the opportunity to make nefariou~ copies.
__f the Invention
It is the principal object of this invention
to thwart nefarious copies of instruments of authentication,
title identification be they bearer negotiable or non-
negotiable, or the like.
The principal protection system of our in~ention
employs a masked warning mark which when copied appears
on the copy due to its effective color density being above
the color reproductive threshold density of the copier.
The mask is of a color density which is below the color
reproductive density of the copier. Any overlay of the
mask and the warning phrase has a color density exceeding
the color reproductive threshold density.
*Trademark
. . .
'

7~:
An additional object of our invention contemplates
chemical color change o~ the warning phrase and/or mask
should chemical bleaching or other alterations be attempted.
Furthermore, the ink may be formulated so as to
bleed upon attempts to chemically alter them.
It is an additional important object, therefore,
of this invention to improve the system disclosed in
U. S. Patent 3,802,724 and provide a protection system to
protect that document against alteration by various well-
known means such as ball point pens, cut and paste of theitem portion of the document, solvent and mechanical
erasure or bleaching of the amount through chemicals, and
yet make them color copier proof.
An additional object of the invention i8 to
provide a document protection system which is adaptable
for use with a high speed apparatus 90 that the item to
be protected may receive the protective element or material
concurrently or simultaneously with the printing of the
amount and signature thereof.
Still another object of the invention is to
provide a relatively simple document protecting means
which may make use of chemical formulations to enhance
protection and yet permits the system to be employed by
means of simple mechanical applicators such as cold pressure
~5 rolls or platens.
It is also an object of the invention to
provide a document protection system which produces
immediately visible evidence of alteration or fraudulent
copying on color copiers regardless of the means used to
make such alterations and which, in the basic preferred

37~
embodiment, permits the additional protection of other
concomitant fraud protection system, both physical and
chemical.
Desc;ription o~ the Drawings
Fig. 1 is a greatly enlarged sectional view in
side elevation of the document protection system as
applied to a conventional check; which may employ our
preferred embodiment;
Fig. 2 is a view of the portion of a camouflage
pattern for use with the present invention; and its
alternative embodiment;
. Fig. 3 is on the same sheet as Figure 1 and is an
isometric view of the tape protecting layered adhesive assembly
in conjunction with a document to be protected;
~ig. 4 is a top plan of a conventional check
illu-~trating the "~OID" pattern arranged over the amount
. .
area of the check; and
Fig. 5 is a view similar to view 4 illustrating
the check protection tape applied over the amount area
iilustrating the complete camouflage of the void pattern
while permitting the amount to be visible through the
tape;
Fig. 6 is a representation of the preferred
embodiment of our invention;
Fig. 7 is an alternative embodiment of our
invention.
.... ... ..
~! , . ~

~G~37~:
Description of the Invention
As is the case of the earlier patented disclosure,
this in~ention is concerned with protection of negotiable
instruments from the hazards of alteration by chemicals,
mechanical cutting pen and ink addition to amounts, and
general eras,ure, obliteration, scuffing and other similar
means of altering or changing numbers has intrigued and
frustrated engineers and laymen alike since the inception
of the use of such instruments. Up until the present time
the skillful forger or document alterer armed with a scant
few chemicals and a reasonable amount of finger dexterity
could alter, change, rearrange, or otherwise make over a
negotiable document into an instrument whose amount and/or
signature had been changed and thereafter pass such
document into the commercial rnoney or banking stream
almo~t at will.
Detection of such alteration varies from
impossible to ridiculously easy depending upon the skill
of the forger. Protection against the known schemes has
run the gamut from chemically compounding various papers
on which the documents are to be preprinted to using
special pens and inks, mechanical checkwriters, special
presses, intricate, large type styles, involved chemical
overlays which were applied to the document both before
and after printing, and certain types of processes more
or less related to the decalcomania art. The present
invention relies for its novelty on none of these and yet
is broadly related to certain of the prior art systems.
In any casa, the present invention in effect avoids the
pitfalls of the prior art while providing an extremely
hig~l degree of pr~tection against alterations and
,, . ~.
,

87~
particularly against reproductions and alterations
using color copiers.
Referr ng to the drawings and first to Fig. 1,
there is shown a portion of a piece of document material,
e.g. check paper, disproportionately enlarged so as to
more clearly make discernible the various elements of
the combination. The check paper 10 which may vary in
thickness from about .0035 to .007 inch may have printed
on the facing surface 12 thereof a printed pattern 14,
e.g. the word "VOID" repeated in multiple lines and
this word or any similar mark may comprise the warning
to at least the cognicenti that its appearance indicates
alteration or forgery. A solvent insoluble substrate
such, for example, as a polyester film base 16 on the
order of .001 inch in thickness is preferably pro~ided
on one surface 18 thereof with a curable silicone resin
plus catalyst coating 20 of .0005 to .00005 inch
thickness. The opposite surface Z2 of the polyester
substrate 16 is provided with a printed, camouflage
pattern 24 which pattern is printed directly on the
film base; and, as will be seen later on herein,
cooperates with the "VOID" pattern printed on the check
in the same color to completely hide or mask the void
pattern. Over the surface of the printed camouflage
pattern 24 there is applied a coating 26 of a high peel
strength, aggressive, solvent and hea~ resistant, pressure
sensitive, adhesive which is approximately .0008 to
.0015 inch in thickness. The ink used to apply the
VOID pattern is solvent insoluble; thus if the adhesive
is dissolved away by a solvent, the pattern of the "VOID"

372
becomes clearly visibly evident and immediately indicates
the fraudulent alteration of the document. In accordance
with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the
camouflage will have a color density which is below the
the color reproductive threshold of the color copier
and a warning mark which is above the color density
threshold of the color copier.
As can be seen from Fig. 1, the polyester
substrate with its multiple layers of material is disposed
with the adhesive coating adjacent the "VOID" pattern
on the check paper.
Fig. 2 is illustrative of one type of camouflage
pattern 24 which may be used with the void pattern 14
of the present invention. Howe~er, it is readily apparent
that other patterns may be used provided the end result
is that the void pattern printed on the check paper is
masked in accordance with our invention thereby 50
that the pattern is invisible to the unaided eye.
This camouflage may be mask marks in registry
for the warning marks or a cover for the warning mark
yet it will be of a density such that it is not a
reproducible density so that it will not be copied when
an attempt is made with a color copier.
Fig. 3 illustrates the manner in which the
check protection system of the present invention can be
employed to protect the amount area of a document, for
example, a negotiable instrument .such as a check. The
layered structure as described in connection with
Fig. 1 is produced in the form of a continuous tape or
band 28 which may be loaded OIItO a supply reel and
,

72
therea-fter fed from the supply reel to the printing
area of the high speed p inter permitting a portion of
the tape to be adherred under cold pressure as by a
rollor and back-up anvil over the amount which has been
printed in the arnount area over the void pattern which
is preprinted on the check structure.
An example of a check structure 10 bearing a
preprinted void pattern 14 is shown in ~ig. ~. This
pattern could also be employed in the signature area
30 and the layered tape construction used in similar
fashion to its use in the amount area.
Fig. 5 illustrates an example of the finally
protected document, in this case a check 10, as it might
appear with the protecting tape 28 adherred over the
amount awaiting the signaturo of the payor with the
"void" pattern camouflaged but with the amount clearly
distinguishable therethrough.
The principal protection system of our
invention employs a masked warning mark or phrase which
when copied appears on the copy due to its effective
color density being above the color reproductive
threshold density of the copier. The mask is of a
color density which is below the color reproductive
density of the copier. Any overlay of the mask and
the warning phrase has a color density exceeding the
color reproductive threshold density. The colGr can be
formulated from standard press inks.
. . .

The thresilold density level for these col~red
inks is: Magenta .12 + .01; Cyan ,08 ~ .01 and Yellow
.05 + 0.01, as read bv a Macbeth densitometer RD517.
Formulations below these densities will not effectively
reproduce on commercial xerographic color copiers such
as the L-6500 even with plctorial screens such as
8R537 (Xero~ . Densities above this level will reproduceO
Thus in accordance with our preferred embodiment,
as seen in Fig. 6, a warning mark "VOID" is laid down
or printed at a density level preferably below the
aforementioned thresholds. T~is warning is overlaid
with our mask which ~ e at a density below the
aforementioned reproductive threshold densities. The
. composite density at those places where the warning mark
is placed is in accordance with our invention above
the aforementioned threshold levels.
Now it should be understood that this invention
and its preferred embodiments are difficult to represent
within the constraints of the Patent Office's pen and
ink drawing requirements.
As illustrated in Fig. 6, the original document
601 has, at least a portion thereof (such as the
amount or signature portion), the warning mark ("VOID"
602) printed in redr This is completely covered with a
red camouflage 603 of a density below the aforesaid
threshold density.
It will be understood that, as may be appreciated
from seeing the drawings that the "VOID" mark is camouflaged
before being copied. After it is copied, as shown in
the Fig. 6 on the L-6500 color copier, 6C4, the "VOID"
*Trademark
11
.. .. . . ~
;~ ,

7Z
mark will be reproduced because the composit~ density
is hi~her at the point where the warning mark 602
appears.
While, due to the styli~ed representation in
Fig~ 6 a solid mark is contemplated, alternate marks
can be made.
Representative of thece alternate embodiments
is Fig. 7. In Fig. 7 the document 701 has the warning
mark 702 and camouflage 703 printed thereon. In this
embodiment circles (which could be dots, squares, lines
or the like) comprise the warning mark 702 and camouflage.
Ihe warning mark is of a higller density than the
surrounding camouflage and in this embodiment the
surrounding camouflage is below the color reproduction
threshold density while the color mask, at least in
composite density if overpainted with the registered
camouflage, is of a density in excess of the threshold
density limits.
- In the preferred embodiment the "~OID" 602
will be printed with a color change ink solution. A
sympathetic ink which turns or gains color and reproductive
intensity when exposed to an eradicator is used in the
marking mark. In the preferred embodiment, this ink
is colorless and may be mixed with the other colored
dies or pigments which form the color of the mark and
also the mask. Examples of sympathetic inks are
"Chlorostain" or liquid (DuPon~ , "Chlorostain" N
(DuPont~, "Chlorostain" WH Liquid (DuPon~), Oxochekh
(Hilton-Davis~.
*Trademark
,
12
~ .... .
' ~

37~2
.
If it is determined that the VOID pattern
exists and an attempt is made to eradicate the pattern
mark, as from the back of the check in Fig. 1-5, with
for instance hypochloride bleach, the ink will darken
indicating a forging attempt.
This color pattern will remain and be even
more readily reproducible as being above the threshold
level of the copies.
~ lorescent inks and other inks used in
conjunction with the threshold level will raise the
security of the system by a cumulative nature.
In cummary we have described a document and
a method of producing it which deters or prevents
counterfeiting utilizing the Xerox*L-6500 Color Copier
or similar machines which possess different color
sensitivity than the human eye. Pastels ~rinted below
a specified critical level (see above limits) will
fail to appear in the copy, while those above the critical
density will appear in the copy.
As a result of the described method of
manufacture of the document the background overprint
or pattern will drop out while the marking phrase or
warning mark will be copied.
It should be understood that the above
description is made by way of example and that various
modifications and rearrangements will occur to those
skilled in the art, both now and in the future, without
departing from the scope of the claims.
* Trademark
13

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1106872 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2011-07-26
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: First IPC derived 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1998-08-11
Grant by Issuance 1981-08-11

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Registration of a document 1998-07-10
Registration of a document 1998-08-10
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DATA BUSINESS FORMS LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
MICHAEL J. MCELLIGOTT
VICTOR J., JR. TKALENKO
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1994-03-18 5 115
Cover Page 1994-03-18 1 11
Drawings 1994-03-18 4 98
Abstract 1994-03-18 1 24
Descriptions 1994-03-18 12 400
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-08-31 1 140
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1998-09-30 1 114