Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
. 1~09819
This application is a division of copending
application No. 294,779 filed January 11, 1978.
The presentinvention relates to a product for charging
a coke oven system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A coke oven is used for making coke from coal.
The crushed coa]. is indirectly heated to generally above
1500F in an oxygen deficient, pressurized atmosphere by
heating the sidewalls of the oven with oil, gas or coal.
Coal tar volatiles are ~riven-off from the coal, leaving
behind coke for use in making iron and steel. The liberated
coal tar volatiles are separate]y collected and distilled
to provide as a by-product a basic raw mat-erial for the
ch~mical industry
One of the problems with coke ovens has been loss
of coal as carryover ~ines. That is, fine coal particles,
in various stages of devolatilization and carbonization,
are emitted from the coke overl through the exit mains
with the volatiles. In a conventional oven, the amount of
carryover fines usually runs between 50 and 100 pounds per
charge. These carryover fines are generally collected in
a dust collector, wet scrubber and pitch trap along with
some coal tar and ash, and disposed of as waste.
Recently, it has been found that the efficiency
of coke ovens can be substantially improved by preheating
the coal. Preheating also permits utilization of lower
~.
llVg8~9
grades of coal and provides an improved coke product. Pre-
heating involves flash heating typically pulverized coal
to about 500F before charging to the coke oven. The coking
can thus be done faster wi~h added production for a given
size coke oven, while producing a stronger more consistent
coke composition from coal blends comprising large portions
of low grade coal. Preheating is credited with providing
greater assurance of complete coking and also reducing air
pol]uting emissions that take place when green coke is
pushed.
The problem is that preheating also causes even
larger losses of coal due to increases in carryover fines.
The grinding of coal to fine particles and the explosive
force exerted on flash heating produce this increased carry-
over. The high and efficient yield of usable coke from
low-grade coal, however, more than offsets the losses in
carryover fines. It has been suggested to use clarifiers
to retrieve coal fines trapped by spray water and recycle
these to the preheater, but this procedure adds to the cost
of installation and operation and still results in loss of
substantial carryover fines.
A compounding problem with coke ovens is air pollu-
tion during charging. It has been estimated that 70 per-
cent of all emissions from a coke oven occur during charging.
A prominent solution for this problem, which has been com~er-
cially used, is pipeline charging. Pipeline charging involves
grinding and screening the coal to form a mass of coal particles.
with a maximum size of 1/4 inch and most under 1/8 inch.
This mass can be pressurized typically by steam and propelled
through pipes to charge the coke oven. The big attraction for
1~)9819
this system is that the coal enters the ovens through a
closed s~ationary network, with little opportunity Eor
dust emissions.
Pipeline charging, however, further increases the
tendency of fine coal particles to carryover to the oven
exhaust system. With preheating, anywhere between 200 and
-; 1000 pounds of carryover fines will typically flow into the
exit mains during a pipeline charge, with the equipment
designed to handle 2000 pounds of carryover fines. See
Iron Age (March 1, 1976) pp. MP-9 to 12. The stringencies
: of recent environmental controls on coke ovens require
these losses be accepted.
The present invention overcomes these difficulties
and disadvantages. It provides a closed coke oven system
where substantially all carryover fines are reclaimed and
recycled to the coke oven with minimum cost in equipment and
operation. The most pertinent art is believed to be the
disclosures of United States Patent Nos. 3,268,071, 3,617,228,
3,637,464, and 3,665,066 and Ganadian J. of Chem. Eng., Vol.
54 February/April 1976, pp. 3-12, which have little or no
relation to the present coke oven system.
: SIJMMARY OF THE INVENTION
.; . _. . . _ . __ _
'
A coke oven system is provided that is an essentially-~ 20 closed system reclaiming virtually all carryover fines at low
cost. Air pollution and effluent emissions are minimized.
The coke oven system comprises a coke oven for con-
verting coal into coke, and preferably preheater means for
preheating the coal to at least about 500F before charging
-4-
11098~9
io t:h(. coke ov~.~n. I~l-ef(~raL~Iy tll~ c~o~] :is ch~r(;ed to the ~okc~ oven
pll~umatically by ~ cl.i.ne charying. ~rhe system ha.s collector means
on ~hc coke oven and prehe.lt:er means, if In~ed, for collectil~lg carry-
over fines from t^he erllissiol-ls ~rom ~ t~ cok/~ oven and preheater.
The collected carryover .fin~s, whicll i.nclude liberated coaJ.
tar volatiles, are preferably bl.eJlC;Cd and mixed to form a mass of
carryover fi.nes with liberated coal tar throughout. Coal fines
feed, which contains coa] tar, in an unliberated state, may be
added to the blend, if desired, to reduce the percentage o~ lib-
erated coal tar in th~ blend and increase the hardness of theagglomerated product. The aqueous mixture is then ci.rculated to
agitator means for agi.tat.ing and agglomerating the collected carry-
over fines.
Theinvention of application No. 294,779 provides a
coke oven system comprising:
A. a coke ovel-l for convert:ing coal :into coke;
B. collector mealls for collecting carryover fines and lib-
erated coal tar from the coke oven; and
C~ agitator means for mixing the carryover fines and lib-
erated coal tar collected from the coke oven with water to forman aqueous mixtur.e, said agitator means also agglomerating the
carryover fines and liberated coal tar collected from the coke oven
to form agglomerates.
The invention of the aforementioned application also con-
templates a method of agglomerating coke oven carryover fines
comprising the steps of:
A. collecting carryover fines and liberated coal tar fromthe coke oven of a coke oven system; and
B. agitating said carryover fines and liberated coal tar of
98~9
the coke oven with water to form an aq~eous mixture and to agglom-
erate the car~yove~ flnes and liberated coal tar in the aqueous
mixture to form agglomerates and the resulting product.
Preferably, agc31Omerat:ioll is performed by first circulating
the blend to mixin~ means for mixing the collected carryover fines
with water to form an aqueous m:ixture. The aqueous miY~tUre is then
circulated to the agi-tator means ancl there agglomerated. The
agglomerated carryover fines are then scparated from the aqueous
mixture by separator means.
By this proce~ure, the agglomerated c~rryover fines can be
used as a separate by-product of the coke overl system. Preferably,
however, the agglornerated carryover fines are circulated to dryer
~eans for conditioning the agglomerate carryover fines for re-
charging to the system. The clried and conditioned agglomerated
carryover fines are thell charged by recycle means to the coke oven
or preheater along with coal feed.
However, this invention is concerned with a product for
charging a coke oven system, said product prepared by:
A. collecting carryover fines and liberated coal tar from a
coke oven system;
B. forming an aqueous mixture consisting essentially of said
- carryover fines, liberated coal tar, and water;
C. agitating said aqueous mixture to agglomerate said carry-
: over fines with said liberated coal tar to from agglomerates;
D. separating said agglomerates from said aqueous mixtureto provide said product.
- 5a -
8~9
0ther details, objects and advanta~es of the
inven~ion will become apparent as the followi.ng description
of the presently preferred embodiments and presently preferred
methods of practicing the same proceed.
BRIEI D~SCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
_ _ __ _
In the accompanying drawings are shown the presently
preferred embodiments of the i.nvention and are illustrated
presently preferred methods of practicing the same, in which:
Figure l is a schematic of a coke oven system
illustrating the present invention; and Figure 2 is a sche-
matic of a coke oven system illustrating the present inven-
tion.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODI~ENTS
Referring to Figure l, a coke oven system is
illustrated. Coal particles 10 preferably of maximum par-
ticle size of l/4 inch and most under l/8 inch are charged
to the system. The coal particles are preferably prepared
by grinding in a rotating cone crusher or the like and wet
screening of coal. Coal particles 10 are typically dried
to a moisture content of about 10 to 15 percent.
Coal particles 10 are charged to preheater 11 where
the coal particles are flash heated to about 500F in about
5 to 8 seconds, preferably with waste gas from the coke oven.
The preheated coal particles 12 are then charged to the coke
oven 13, which is of a standard design. Preferably, the
charging to coke oven 13 is done pneumatically by pipeline
charging. In the coke oven 13 the coal particles are heated
to about 1500 ~o 1850F, driving off the coal tar volatiles
14A and producing furnace or foundry coke 14B, as desired.
1109819
In preheater 11, considerable airborne particulate
emissions are produced due to the extremely rapid and high
temperature heating of the fine coal particles 10. The
moisture content in coal particles lO causes some particles
to virtually explode and fragment during the rapid heating.
The carryover fines 15 are collected from the preheater 11
and circulated to dust collector 16, where the carryover
fines 17 are separated from the gaseous emissions 18. The
separated carryover fines are often referred to as preheat
filter cake and ash pit residues depending on the particular
technique of separation in dust collector 16. Typically,
dust collector 1~ is a series of cyclone separators and
wet scrubbers in combination, where ~he fines from the
cyclones are collected in an ash pit and the fines from the
scrubbers are collected as filter cake.
Similarly, airborne particulate emissions 19
from coke oven 13 are emitted through an exhaust main and
circulated to dust collector 20, wllere carryover fines 21
are collected as filter cake and ash pit residues and sep-
arated from gaseous emissions 22. Again typically, dust
collector 20 is a series of cyclone separators and wet
scrubbers in combination. These carryover fines include
substantial quantities of coal tar ~olatiles liberated
from the coal in the coke oven. Also carryover fines 23,
which include substantial coal tar, are collected from the
pi~ch trap of the coke o~en 13.
Typical compositions of the collected carryover
fines are as follows:
. .
-7- .
~11098~9
~.,
filter _ake ~ pi ch ash
Moisture content* 50.0% 20.0 20.0
Tar
(oil content 25.0% 31.2 41.4
of solids)**
% of ash in solidsb** 17.3% 5.6 6.0
* Moi.sture conten~ is weight % of water of carryover fine
feed.
0 '~ b Weight % of toluene extractable oil on a water free
basis
b*~ Weight % on oil free and water free basis
The carryover fines 17 collected from preheater 11
and the carryaver fines 21 and 23 collected from coke oven 13
are then pumped and blended in a suitable blender 25. The
carryover fines are blended to provide sufficient liberated
coal tar, preferably 3 to 30 percent and most desirably 5 to
20 percent by weight on a wet basis of the carryover fine
feed, to insure effective agglomerating in a later step of
the process. In this connection, it should be noted that
"liberated coal tar" means that the coal tar attains a freed
state, by heating, separate from or along with the coal par-
~icles in various stages of coking.
Sufficient liberated coal tar is present in an
indiscriminate blend of the carryover fines from the coke
oven and preheater, which in a typical system is ~0 percent
from the cyclone separators (i.e. ash pit), 19 percent from
the wet scrubbers (i.e. filter coke) and 1 percent from the
pitch trap. However, if too much liberated coal tar is present
to provide agglomerates of sufficient hardness to withstand
l~g819
recirculation Lo ~he coke oven or preheater, con~rolled
q~ n~i~ies o~ coal part-icles 10~, containillg lln]iberated
coal tar, can be added to reduce the pel-cerltage of liberated
coal t.ar in the blend. Preferably, blender 25 is the feed
p~lmp to mixer 27 (hereafter described) that functions to
transport and homogenize, possibly in controlled proportions,
the separately collected components of carryover fines from
the coke oven and preheater. Because of the consistency of
the collected carryover fines, with liberated coal tar in-
cluded, a pump for viscous materials such as Moyno pump, orscrew-type feeder is preferred for blender 25.
The blended carryover fines 26 are then preferably
mixed and dispersed in water in mixer 27, which for agglomer-
ation of a water dispersion is a high shear mixer. Preferably
the dispersion is between 5 and 40 percent and most desirably
between lS and 25 percent carryover fines in water. In
mixer 27, the dispersion is agitated and agglomerated ~o
agglomerates of less than 1/4 inch and mostly less than 1/8
inch in size. The intensi.ty of mixing and the temperature
in mixer 27 control the residence time required and the size
of the agglomerates. A temperature of about 50C is pre-
ferred in the mixer and a resi.dence time in the order of
5 seconds to 1 minute. Process heat may be provided by the
heat content of the carryover fines, or steam may be injected
to achieve the desired temperature. Experimentation in the
individual system is necessary to optimize the agglomerate
size and hardness. For example, if the agglomerates prove
to be too large at 50C, the temperature could be raised to
reduce the viscosity and in turn the agglomerate size. Altern-
atively, the amount of carryover fines containing small
~09819
quantities of liberated coal tar can be increased in thefeed blend to reduce the a~glomerate size and hardness.
Coal particles lOA can also be and preferably are proportion-
ally added at the blender 25 ~o control agglomerate size and
hardness. If the agglomerates are too small or hard, the
intensity of mixing can be reduced or t~e amount of carry-
over fines containing larger quantities of liberated coal
tar is increased in the feed blend.
Respecting high shear mixer 27, in one desirable
embodiment, a 60 gallon tank with a 14.7 !TP. agitator operat-
ing at 1500 rpm and an impeller diameter of 14 inches
(28 meters/sec. peripheral speed) can be used on a 25 per-
cent carryover slurry. Three turbine impellers mounted at
: different heights on the shaft and 4 or 8 radial baffles
(donut baffles or "stage dividers") can also be used. Such
a mixer vol~lme will provide about 20 seconds residence time,
which for 10 tons per hour processing rate is expected to be
ideal.
After mixer 27, the agglomerated mixture 28 can
be circulated to holding or surge tank 29, which is provided
with agitator 30. An additional residence time of 2 to 5
minutes can thus be imparted to the mixture to finish forming
the agglomerates under a gentler agitation. Depending on
the performance of the high intensity mixer discussed above,
however, the agitated holding tank 29 may not be needed and
the agglomerated mixture 28 can go directly to separator 31.
The agglomerated mixture 31 or 28 is pumped to a
separator 32 which separates the agglomerated carryover
fines from the water by size and/or density. Preferably, a
vibratory dewatering screen, with a suggested mesh size of
-10-
1~098~L9
65 mesll, is used for separcltor 32. A coarser mesh (e.g.
30 mesh) may also be used if there is no objection to some
~ines being recycled with the wa~:er. Alternatively, a sieve
bend of an appropriate mesh size, such as that manufactured
by authority from DSM NV Vederna]dse Staatsmijnen, may be
used for separator 32. Otiler commercially available size
separators such as an elutriator, or cyclone or spiral sep-
arator may also be utilized. Alternatively, the agglomerated
carryover may also be separated in a float-sink tank where
the agglomerates, which tend to float, are skimmed off by
a rotating paddle through an overflow, while the water and
unagglomerated carryover fines, which tend to sink, are
removed through the bottom of separator 32 as an underflow
33 substantially free of carryover fines and agglomerates.
This underflow is recylced to mixer 27 for use in mixing
and agglomerating as above described.
The separated agglomerated carryover fines 34
may then be processed through dewatering means (not shown),
such as a centrifuge, to remove water absorbed on the agglom-
erates. Such separated water is also recirculated back tomixer 27 for reuse. Dewatering apparatus is not, however,
necessary or preferred.
Agglomerated carryover fines 34 may be used as a
separate commercial product. Preferably, however, the
separated agglomerated carryover fines 34 are heated to
500F in dryer 35 and conditioned by oxidation, hydrolysis,
polymerization and the like to a hardened mass. A vibrating,
shallow fluid bed dryer is preferred, such as that manufac-
tured by Jeffrey. Generally, about 25 percent water is the
design load on dryer 35. This is a maximum figure based on
experimentation with a stationary 8-inch sieve screen. With
1~98~9
a vibrating dewatering screen in separator 32, the typical
moisture content in separated agglomerated carryover fines
34 is expected to be on the order oE 10 to 15 percent.
The retention time in dryer 35 is preferably
greater than 30 seconds and up to generally one hour is
contemplated, with the retention time usually on the order
of 5 to 20 minutes. And the heating is not as rapid as in
preheater 11 so that the agglomerated carryover fines are
"conditioned" preparatory for charging to preheater 11 or
alternatively coke oven 13. Such conditioning substantially
hardens the agglomerates and reduces the fragmentation and
carryover emissions for the agglomerates on charging to the
preheater by removing volatiles (primarily water) 37. If
appropriate, the volatiles 37 may be collected and separated
in the dust collector (not shown) and carryover fines 38
circulated to the blender 25. The dried carryover agglom-
erates 36 are then preferably charged to preheater 11 along
~ith coal particles 10, and subsequently processed into
coke in coke oven 13 as above described.
Referring to ~igure 2, an alternative coke oven
system is illustrated in which the agglomeration is performed
under dry conditions. In description of this embodiment, the
components are designated with corresponding prime numbers
to those described in connection with Figure 1 to show sim-
ilarities and differences from the coke oven system and em-
bodied method there described.
Coal particles 10' are prepared as described in
connection with ~igure 1 of the same controlled particle
size. The coal particles are then charged in preheater 11'
and preheated as there described. The preheated coal
-1.2-
- ~1098~
particles 12' are then charged to coke oven 13', where they
~re processed into coal tar volatiles 14A' and furnace or
foundry ~oke 14B' as there described. Carryover fines 17'
and 21' are collected from dust col.lectors 16' and 20', re-
spectively and circulated to a mixer 27' through blender 25',
i.f desired, along with the collection 23' from a pitch trap.
In mixer 27', the carryover fines are agitated,
preferably under fairly gentle conditions, to form agglom-
erates. Mixers particularly suitable for this purpose are
double arm kneader-mixers, pug mills, paddle mixers, dough
mixers and the like.
Generally, the carryover fines will contain too
much liberated coal tar. For this reason, coal particles
lOA' are usually added to the mixer 27' preferably by
mixing with the carryover fines in mi.xer 25'. To provide
good agglomeration, the carryover fi.nes should be preferably
3 to 30 percent and most desirably 5 to 20 percent by
weight of the total material passing through the mixer.
The residence time in rnixer 25' is preferably on the order
of 2 to 15 minutes.
The agglomerated carryover fines 34' are then
circulated to dryer 35', where the agglomerates are pref-
erably heated and conditioned as above described in connec-
tion with Figure 1. The conditioned agglomerated carryover
fines 36' are then preferably recycled to the coke oven
system and preferably preheater ll'.
coke oven system is thus provided ~hich is almost
entirely closed. The atmospheric emissions are minimized,
and no effluent is produced. Conversely, only small amounts
-13-
11~98~
`~.....
of makcup water 39 need he added to the system to maintain
the operation ~here a~p,lomerati.on is prepared in an aqueous
mediuM. In addi.tion, no additional components such as
heat need be ac~decl to the system. And most importantly,
essentially a].l coal charged to the system is processed into
coke witll minimum expense in capital outlay and operation.
~ lile the preferred embodiments of the invention
have been specifically described, it i.s distinctly under-
stood that the invention may be otherwise variously embodied
and used within the scope of the following claims.
1 l~
