Language selection

Search

Patent 1110039 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1110039
(21) Application Number: 1110039
(54) English Title: REDUCTION OF FERRIC CHLORIDE
(54) French Title: REDUCTION DU CHLORURE FERRIQUE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C01G 49/10 (2006.01)
  • C01B 17/45 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CLARKE, JOHN A. (United Kingdom)
  • GABB, PHILIP J. (United Kingdom)
  • HOPKIN, WILLIAM (United Kingdom)
  • LUMSDEN, JOHN (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • MINERAL PROCESS LICENSING CORPORATION B.V.
(71) Applicants :
  • MINERAL PROCESS LICENSING CORPORATION B.V.
(74) Agent: ANDREW M. HASSELLHASSELL, ANDREW M.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1981-10-06
(22) Filed Date: 1979-05-10
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
19988/78 (United Kingdom) 1978-05-16
19989/78 (United Kingdom) 1978-05-16

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT
The invention relates to a method for the
reduction of ferric chloride to produce ferrous chloride.
The method comprises using gaseous sulphur or a gaseous
sulphur chloride in which the atomic ratio of sulphur to
chlorine is more than 1:1 as the reducing agent. The
reaction is conveniently performed in a fluidised bed.
According to a particular aspect, the ferric chloride
reduction forms part of a process for the recovery of
chlorine values from iron chloride by-produced by
industrial processes such as the chlorination of a
titaniferrous or aluminous material.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive
property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A method for the reduction of ferric chloride to
produce ferrous chloride which comprises reacting, at a temper-
ature of between 120°C to 650°C, ferric chloride with a reducing
agent selected from the group of reducing agents consisting of
gaseous sulphur,
a mixture of gaseous sulphur and gaseous sulphur
chloride in which the atomic ratio of total sulphur in said
gaseous sulphur and said gaseous sulphur chloride to the
chlorine in said gaseous sulphur chloride is more than 1:1,
and
gaseous sulphur chloride in which the atomic ratio
of sulphur to chlorine is more than 1:1.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the reducing
agent consists of gaseous sulphur.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the reducing
agent consists of a mixture of gaseous S2Cl2 and gaseous S.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the reaction
is performed in a fluidised bed of ferrous chloride.
5. A method as claimed in claims 2 or 3, wherein the
the reaction is performed in a fluidised bed of ferrous chloride.
6. A method as claimed in claim 1, 2 or 4, wherein the
temperature is between 200°C and 450°C.
7. A method as claimed in claim 1, 2 or 4, wherein the
temperature is between 300°C and 450°C.
8. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the reducing
agent is introduced to a reactor in which the reaction is
performed in the gaseous state.
13

9. A method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the reducing
agent is introduced to a reactor in which the reaction is
performed in the gaseous state.
10. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the gaseous
product of the reaction is condensed and subjected to fractional
distillation to produce chlorine as the overhead product and
a sulphur-rich sulphur chloride as the bottom product.
11. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the gaseous
product of the reaction is condensed and subjected to fractional
distillation to produce chlorine as the overhead product and
a sulphur-rich sulphur chloride as the bottom product.
12. A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the fractional
distillation is performed in two stages comprising a first
stage at atmospheric pressure with an overhead temperature
of between 20°C and 60°C and a bottom temperature of between
140°C and 180°C, whereby a sulphur-rich sulphur chloride bottom
product and a chlorine-rich sulphur chloride overhead product
are obtained and a second stage at substantially 10 atmospheres
pressure with an overhead temperature of between 20°C and
60°C and a bottom temperature of between 160°C and 220°C, where-
by a substantially pure elemental chlorine is produced as overhead
product and a sulphur chloride in which tne atomic ratio of sulpher
to chlorine is approximately equal is produced as bottom product.
13. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the
fractional distillation is performed in two stages comprising
a first stage at atmospheric pressure with an overhead temperature
of between 20°C and 60°C and a bottom temperature of between
140°C and 180°C, whereby a sulphur-rich sulphur chloride bottom
product and a chlorine-rich sulphur chloride overhead product
are obtained and a second stage at substantially 10 atmospheres
pressure with an overhead temperature of between 20°C and 60°C

Claim 13 continued ...
and a bottom temperature of between 160°C and 220°C, whereby
a substantially pure elemental chlorine is produced as overhead
product and a sulphur chloride in which the atomic ratio of
sulphur to chlorine is approximately equal is produced as
bottom product.
14. A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the fractional
distillation is performed in a single stage at a pressure of
about 10 atmospheres with an overhead temperature of between
20°C and 60°C and a bottom temperature of between 200°C and
240°C to produce substantially pure elemental chlorine as
the overhead product and a sulphur-rich sulphur chloride as
the bottom product.
15. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the fractional
distillation is performed in a single stage at a pressure of
about 10 atmospheres with an overhead temperature of between
20°C and 60°C and a bottom temperature of between 200°C and
240°C to produce substantially pure elemental chlorine as the
overhead product and a sulphur-rich sulphur chloride as the
bottom product.
16. A method as claimed in claims 10, 12 or 14, wherein
the reaction temperature is between 200°C and 450°C.
17. A method as claimed in claims 10, 12 or 14, wherein
the reaction temperature is between 300°C and 450°C.
18. A method as claimed in claim 1, which further com-
prises subjecting the ferrous chloride product to an oxidation
reaction with oxygen or an oxygen-containing gas to produce
ferric chloride and ferric oxide and recycling the resulting
ferric chloride to the reduction reaction.

19. A method as claimed in claims 4, 10 or 12, which
further comprises subjecting the ferrous chloride product to
an oxidation reaction with oxygen or an oxygen-containing gas
to produce ferric chloride and ferric oxide and recycling the
resulting ferric chloride to the reduction reaction.
20. A method as claimed in claims 13, 14, or 15, which
further comprises subjecting the ferrous chloride product to
an oxidation reaction with oxygen or an oxygen-containing gas
to produce ferric chloride and ferric oxide and recycling the
resulting ferric chloride to the reduction reaction.
21. A method as claimed in claim 18 wherein the ferric
chloride is derived from an iron chloride by-produced in a
process comprising chlorinating a material selected from the
group of materials comprising titaniferous materials and
aluminous materials.
22. A method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the ferric
chloride is derived directly from an iron chloride by-produced
in a process comprising chlorinating a material selected from
the group of materials comprising titaniferous materials and
aluminous materials.
23. A method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the ferric
chloride is derived indirectly from an iron chloride by-produced
in a process comprising chlorinating a material selected from
the group of materials comprising titaniferous materials and
aluminous materials.
16

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


V39
This invention relates to a method for the
reduction of ferric chloride.
More particularly this invention relates to
a method for the partial dec~lorination of ferric
5 chloride to ferrous chloride in the presence of one
or more suitable reducing agents.
According to a particu]ar aspect of this
invention the partial dechlorination of ferric chloride
is a step in a method for the recovery of the chlorine
10 values from iron chloride obtained as a by-product, for
example, from the chlorination of a titaniferrous material
containing more than 5% by~eight iron oxide such as
ilmenite, or obtained as a by-product from the chlorination
of an aluminous material, such as bauxite.
United States Patent No, 41407ll6 describes a
process ior the recovery of the chlorine values Lrom
iron ch]oride obtained as a by-product from the chlor-
ination of a titaniferrous material cont~ining more than
5% by weight iron oxide which comprises the steps of:
(a) subjecting ferric chloride to partial
dechlorination in the presence of one or more suitable
reducing a~ents to produce ferrous chloride and a chloride
compound;
(~) subjecting ferrous chloride to an oxidation
"~ reaction in the presence of oxygen or a molecular ox~en-

11~0039
containin~ ~as at a temperature between 300C and
1200C to produce ferric chloride and ferric oxide; and
(c) recycling the resulting ferric chloride to
the ~artial dechlorination step (a).
Similar methods for recovering the chlorine
values from iron chloride are disclosed in Canad~an
application No. 327,367 relatin~ to iron chloride by-
produe~d in thc chlorination o~ an aluminolls material
e.g. bauxite.
In those processes, a suitable reducin~
agent for ~age (a) is defined as one which meets t~le
two following conditions: ~irst that it is effective in
dec}llorinating ferric chloride to ferrous chloride;
second, that in reaction wit~ ferric chloride, it produces
15 a chlolide compound which, directly or after further
processin~, is either suitable for recycle to the
chlorination process (if appropriate) or has other
industrial utility.
One such suitable reducin~ agent described
20 in the United States Patent No. 4140746 and
Canadian Application No. 327,367 is sulphur, and the
method o~ usin~ it was summarised in the followin~
equation (1):-
Fe2C16(s) + 2S(l)--~FeC12(s) + S2C12(~)....(1)
5 (where (s) represents solid, (1) represents liquid andtg) r~presents gas).

~0039
--4--
Thus in equation (1) liquid sulphur is
reacted with solid ferric chloride to produce solid
ferroujchloride and gaseous sulphur monochloride.
The method of using sulphur as the reducing
5 agent for ferric chloride, which is summarised in
equation (1), has been established experimentally as
an effective and successful procedure. Howe~er, it
has two major drawbacks. First, it requires that the
ferric chloride produced in the oxi~ation stage (b)
is condensed from the ~as stream, which is a costly
an~ elaborate procedure. Second, the equipment required
for contacting and mixing liquid sulphur with solid
ferric chloride is, again, costly and elaborate.
It has now surprisingly been found that the
15 reaction represented by equation (1) can be carried out
much more conveniently and advantageously using gaseous
sulphur or a gaseous sulphur chloride in which the atomic
ratio of the sulphur to chlorine is more than 1:1.
The fact that this reaction can be successfully
~0 carried out is surprising because the literature sug~ests
that sulphur monochloride is increasingly decomposed
into sulphur and chlorine as its temperature nses, until
at the boiling point of sulphur (444C) it is iully
decomposed. Thus the use of gaseous su]phur or ~aseous
sulphur chloride in which the atomic ratio of sulphur to

ll~Q039
chlorine is more than 1:1 to produce sulphur monochloride
and ferrous chloride by reaction with l'erric chloride
did not appear promising.
Nevertheless, it has been found that sulphur
5 or gaseous sulphur chloride in which the atomic ratio
of sulphur to chlorine is more than 1:1 is an effective
reducin~ agent for ~aseous ferric chloride, particularly
when used in a gas fluidised bed of solid ferrous chlorde.
Thus, the present invention provides a method
10 of reducing ferric chloride to ferrous chloride wherein
ferric chloridc in ~e gaseous or solid statc is partially
dechlorinated in the presence of gaseous sulphur or a
gaseous sulphur chloride in which the atomic ratio of
sulphur to chlorine is more than 1:1 to form ferrous
15 chloride in the solid state in accordance with the following
reaction equations:
Fe2cl6(g/s) + S2(g)--~ 2~eC12(s) ~ S2C12(g) --(2)
2-z~e2C16(g/S) + S5C12(g)--~ 5FeC12(s) + 2-1-S2C12(g)..(3)
In these equations, the second term in equation
2~ (3) represents an example of a sulphur chloride on which
the atomic ratio ~ sulphur to chlorine is more than 1:1.
In practice a ~aseous mixture of S2Cl" and S may be employed
as the sulphur chloride.
The method according to the present invention is
particularly suited to be the partial dechlorination step
(a) of' a method for the recovery of -tlle chlorine values

1110~39
~,
from iron chloride,
Thus the ferric chloride input to the method summarised
in equations (2) ~md (3) preferably deri~es from the
processes disclosed in United States Patent No. 4140746
and Canadian Application No. 327,367. However, the present
invention is not limited to ~erric chloride derive~
from any ~articular source,
The reaction between ~seous sulphur/gaseous
sulphur chloride and ferric chloride is preferably
carrie~ out in a fluidised bed of (product) ferrous
chlori~e, The be~ temperature should be at least
suf~icient to maintain the sulphur or sull)hur chloride
in the gas phase, The actual minimum temperature for
this purpose will vary with the composition of the
source of sulphur values and with thc 4uantity of any
inert ~ases present in thc n~ctor, Thus the overall
temperature limits for the reaction are ~)etween 120C
and 650C, preferably between ~()0C aJId ~50C and more
particularly between 300C and 450C,
Alternatively, a stirred hed ~actor or a rotary
kiln coul(l be used. The reaction is prcferably carried
out continuously,
The sulphur ~alues, either as elemental
sulphur or as a sulphur chloride in which the atomic
ratio of sulphur to chlorine is more than 1:1, are

1~10039
preferably introduced to the reactor as a gas, but
may a1so be introduced as a liqui~l in which case
the liquid is immediately gasified by contact with
the hot reaction bed prior to reaction of the sulphur
chloride with the ferric chloride.
The ferric chloride is preferably introduced
to the reactor as a gas, but may also be introduced
as a solid.
The off-gas from the reactor is preferably
condensed to a liquid and centrifu~ed to remove solid
lO particles (ferric and ferrous chlonde). The resulting
sulphur chloride, which is predominantly S2Cl2, may then
be treated by various methods depending on the industrial
circumstances to the plant. If the ferric chloride feed
to t~le process accordin~ to the invention has been
15 obtained by a sulpho-chlorination process, for example
a bauxitc sulpho-ch10rination process, it is preferred
to recycle the S~C12 to the sulpho-cl-l~rination process.
However, if the ferric chloride feed has been
obtained by a carbo-chlorination process, for example
20 an ilmenite carbo-chlorination, it is preferred to
pass the S2Cl2 to a fractional distillation p~oce~s.
By fractional distillation, chlorine is recovered as the
overhea~ product an(l a sulphur chloride with between
60~/o and 80~o atomic percent sulphur i~ obtained as the

1~10C)39
bottom produet whieh ean then be reeyeled to the
re~uetion proeess aeeording to the invention.
Alternatively, the S2Cl2 obtained from the off-gas
may be reae~ed with earbon disulphide to produee earbon
tetraehloride whieh ean be used either for reeyele to
the earbo-elllorination reaetion or for sale to other
industrial l)rocesses, with the by-product sulphur being
rccyclcd to the re(llletion reaction: or the S2Cl2 product
may be reactc(l with carbon monoxide to produee phosgene
whieh may be recyeled to the earbo-ehlorination reaetion
or ~)assc(l f`or sale to other industrual proeGsses, with
the by-l)roduet sulptlur or sulphur ehloride being
recycle(l to -the reduetion reaction.
Where fraetional distillation is employed,
1~ it is preferred to perform the disti]lation in two
sta~cs. In a first sta~e S2Cl2 is fcd to a first
distillation eolumn whieh operates at atmospherie pressure
with an overhead temperature of between 2~3C an~ 60C
and a bottom temperature of between 140C and 180C
such that there are pro(iuced a swlphur-rich bottom
pro~uct an(l a ehlorine-rich overhead prolluct. The
bottom product which preferably contains between 60
and 8~3% atomie percent of sulphur is recycled for the
reductiorl oL ferric ehloride. In a second stage, the
chlorine-rich sulphur chloride overhead pro(luct

39
g
from the first distillation column is fed to a second
distillation column which is operated at a pressure of
about 10 atmospheres with an overhead temperature of
between 20C and 60C and a bottom temperature of
5 between 160C and 220C. Pure elemental chlorine is
produced as t~ overhead product and a sulphur chloride
in which the atomic ratio of sulphur to chlorine is
approximately equal is produced as the bottom product.
The chlorine overhead product can, for e~ample, be
10 recycled to the chlorination process from which the
ferric chlorisie was ob~ained and the s~lphur chloride
bottom product may be recycled to the first distillation
column.
Instead of the two-sta~e distillation process,
15 just described, a single-sta~e distillation process may
be employed although this is more energy intensive. In
~he sase of a single-sta~e distillation process~ it is
preferred to use an elevated pressure of about 10 atmos-
pheres, with an overhead temperature of bctween 20C
20 and 60C and a bottom temperature between 200C and
'40C to produce the same products as in th~ -two-stage
process.
The ferrous chloride bed overflow from the
25 reduction reactor is preferably converted to ferric
chloride and ferric oxide by reaction with a controlled

~110~!39
--10--
4uantity of oxy~en or air, as disclosed for stage (b)
of the process, described in United States Patent No.
]~l0746 and in Canadian Application No. 327,367
re~,ating to the recovery of-chlorine values from iron
5 ch]oride derived from various sources. The resultin~
iron chloride is preferably recycled to the reduction
reaction which is the subject of this invention.
The i,nvention is further illustrated by the
following Examples:
10 EXAMPLE 1:
A 100 mm diameter bed of ferrous chloride
was fluidised at 380C usin~r a ~as mixture analysing:-
4~/min ferric chloride gas
2 ~min nitrogen
4~/min sulphur chlorine mixture
(atomic ratio sulphur to chlorine:- 2:1)
The ferric chloride and sulphur/chlorine mi~ture
entered the bed t}lrough separate orifices and the off-gas
was found to have reacted completely to give a sulphur
20 monochloride off-gas with ne~ ible reidual ferric
e~llori~e. The ferrous chloride reaction product reported
to the reaction bed.
l~X~MPII~ 2:
The distillation of S2C12 produced according
to the equation (~) was carned out in a 80 mm diameter
~ . .

1110~39
B Inconel column, which was used for ~oth stages as
~et out helow. For convenience, the quantities of
feed material used in each stage were not matched
since the critical constraint was the heat load on
5 the condcnser. Samples were collected for analysis
after three hours runnin~ time, and the results are
~iven below. The theoretical heats (i.e. the heat
input at the ~ottom and the heat load on the condensers)
were up to 50,o greater in practice , at the feed rates
l0 specified.
Sta~e l Sta~e "
Pressure: Atmospheric 10 Atmospheres
Packin~: 1.06 metre~ of Knitmesh 1.G metres of Knitmesh
Multifil packin~ (equiv- Multifil packin~ (equiv-
alent to 20 theoretical ~ent to 30 theoretical
platcs) plates)
Location Centre of Column 60~o of packing below
of Feed and ~0,~ above.
Plate:
Theoretical 47 Kcal/mole/feed l4 Kcal/mole/feed
Heat Input
at Bottom:
lIeat Load on
Condenser: 34 Kcal/mole/feed ~.5 Kcal/mole/feed
Feed Analy~is:
lOO~ S Cl 9O mole' SCl~ l0 mole '~
S Cl,~
Top Product
25 Analysis: 90 mole ~0 SCl2 l lOO~,o Cl (99.7 - 3%)
2 2

1~10039
--12--
_Sta~e l Sta~e 2
Bottom Product
Analysis: 80 mole% S 20 mole % 100~/ S2C12 ( 78- 2~o)
S2C1 2
Reflux Ratio: 5 3
5 Feed Rate &
Temperature: 27 moles/hour at 20C 170 moles/ho~ 20C
Top Production
R~.te & Temp. 22 moles/hour at 50C 76 moles/hour 30C
Bottom Production
Rate & Temp. 25 moles/hour at 160C 93 moles/hour 210C

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1110039 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1998-10-06
Grant by Issuance 1981-10-06

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MINERAL PROCESS LICENSING CORPORATION B.V.
Past Owners on Record
JOHN A. CLARKE
JOHN LUMSDEN
PHILIP J. GABB
WILLIAM HOPKIN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1994-03-24 4 146
Cover Page 1994-03-24 1 11
Abstract 1994-03-24 1 13
Drawings 1994-03-24 1 5
Descriptions 1994-03-24 11 286