Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
BACKGROU~ID OF TE~E INVENTION
This invention relates to a tracking-error correcting
system for use with record medium scanning apparatus and, more
particularly, to such a system wherein the support structure of
a scanning transducer is deflected to change the scanning path of
that transducer so as to bring the scanning path into substantial
coincidence with a record track.
In signal recording and/or reproducing apparatus of the
type having a rotary head assembly which scans successive parallel
tracks on a record medium, signal information generally is recordea
by moving the medium relative to the head assembly and by scanning
the relatively moving medium. Although this general type of apparatus
is useful for recording analog or digital signals representing various
types of information, one particularly advantageous use thereof is
to record video signal information. Accordingly, video signal record-
ers have been developed for use with magnetic tape, magnetic sheets,
magnetic discs, and various other types of record media. While the
following explanation and description ïs applicable to different
types of recording apparatus which use different media, it is
believed that such explanation and description can be significantly
simplified by referring to video signal recorders which us~ magnetic
tape, such as the video tape recorder (VTR).
In a typical VTR, one and preferabl~ two record/playback
heads are mounted on a suitable rotary assembly, and magnetic tape
is helically wrapped about at least a portion of a guide drum within
which are disposed the heads for scanning parallel, slant tracks
across the surface of the tape. During a normal recording mode,
the tape is advanced at a predetermined speed. For purposes of
synchronizing the movement of the tape and the rotary movement of
the heads, servo control circuitry is provided and is responsive to
.',
: -, , - - . ~ .
the l~ertical synchronizing signal normally provided in the video
signal which is recorded. The same synchronization between the
relative movement of thetape with respect to the scanning heads
is achieved during a reproducing operation. Thus, the servo control
circuitry is responsive to control signals which are recorded on the
tape during a recording operation as well as to signals which repre-
sent the position of the rotary heads during the reproducins opera-
tion. These control and position signals serve to adjust the drive
speed of the tape and, in some systems, to adjust the rotary speed
of the heads. By so controlling the relative movement of the tape
with respect to the heads, the heads can scan the same record tracks
during a reproducing operation as were scanned during a recording
operation. Therefore, during normal tape speed, synchronizing cir-
cuitry serves to insure that the scanning path of the heads substan-
tially coincides with the previously recorded record tracks.
Desirably, many VTR systems are provided with modified
reproducing operations, such as "stop," "slow-motion" and "fast-
motion." In these different reproducing modes, the relative speed
of movement between the tape and the scanning heads differs from the
relative speed during recording. Consequently, the scanning path
of the heads no longer coincides with the r~cord tr~ck. Furthermare,
the scanning path is not parallel to the record track during these
different reproducing modes. Rather, the scanning path is inclined,
or angularly dlsposed, with respect to the record track.
Heretofore, it was thought that, for accuracy in recording
and reproducing video signals, the heads should be rigidly mounted
to the rotary assembly. For example, if the rotary assembly is
formed of rotating arms, the heads should be fixed securely to such
arms. In another embodiment, if the rotary assembly is formed of one
of the tape-guide drums, that is, if the guide drum assembly is formed
--2--
.. . . . .. . , .. . ~, :. , ,. :. . . . -
of two face-to-face drums, one of which drums rotates, the heads
should be securely mounted to the rotary drum. Aithough the scan-
ning path of such rigidly mounted heads still will not coincide
with the record tracks during non-normal te.g. "stop," "slow-motion"
or "fast-motion") reproducing modes, it was thought that if the
scanning path could intersect the record track at the approximat~
mid-point of the record track, then noise or crosstalk due to the
non-coincidence of the scanning path and record track could be
minimized. This mid-point intersection generally can be achieved
by suitably positioning, or moving the tape so as to change the
exact position of the scanning path relative to the record tracks
as the heads scan the tape.
It has been proposed in U.S. Patent ~o. 3,787,616 that
a reproducing head can be supported on a leaf assembly that is
formed of piezo-electric sections which are responsive to a voltage
applied thereto so as to bend or deflect, thereby deflecting the
leaf assembly and moving the reproducing head. The purpose of
this patent is to eliminate "jitter"; and to this ef~ect, the lea~
assembly and reproducing head are moved in a direction such that
the head is displaced in the longitudinal direction of the record
track, or tape. There is no recognition of correcting for a devia-
tion between the scanning path and the skewed record track in a
rotary head record/reproduce system such as a VTR.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to
provide an improved tracking-error correcting system which is advan-
tageously used in rotary head recording/reproducing apparatus.
Another object of this invention is to provide a tracking-
error correcting system fox use in a rotary heaa recording/reproducing
a~paratus so as to correct for deviations between the scanning path
of a head and a record track on the record medium.
A further object of this invention is to provide a
tracking-error correcting system for use in rotary head recoraing/
reproducir~g apparatus wherein the scanning path of the rotary head
is adjusted so as to coincide with a previously recorded record track.
An additional object of this invention is to provide a
tracking-error correcting system for use in apparatus wherein a
scanning head traverses a scanning path which deviates from a desired
path, this deviation being corrected by displacing the support member
upon which the head is mounted during a scanning operation.
Yet another object of this invention is ~o provide a
tracking-error correcting system for use in video signal recording/
reproducing apparatus wherein noise or distortion which are pres~nt
during non-normal reproducing modes because of a deviation between
the scanning track of the reproducing transducer and the previously
recorded record track on the record medium is minimized by eliminating
such deviation.
Various other objects, advantages and features of the
present invention will become readily apparent from the ensuing
detailed description, and the novel features will be particularly
pointed out in the appended claims.
SUMMP.RY OF THE I~VENTION
In accordance with this invention, a tracking-error
correcting system is provided for use in apparatus of the type
wherein signal information is recorded in parallel tracks on a
record medium and wherein that record medium is scanned by at least
one transducer whose scanning path may not coincide with the parallel
tracks during some modes of operation. A ramp signal generator gen-
erates a periodic ramp signal of substantiall~y constant amplitude
having a duration e~ual to at least a portion of the time required
for the transducer to traverse its scanning path. The level of the
- 4
' . ` ' `' ' ' " . ' ' ` . `' . ` ' ' ." ' ' " :
~-- - -. :
ramp signal is changed for each scan of the ~ransducer, and
this level-changed ramp signal is used to produce a drive
signal. The transducer is supported on an adjustable support
which is responsive to the drive signal so as to displace
the transducer transversely with respect to the parallel
tracks by an amount determined by the amplitude of the drive
signal. This displacement of the transducer tends to align
its scanning path coincidentally with the parallel tracks.
A detector, responsive to the signals reproduced by the
transducer, detects when the deviation of the scanning path
with respect to thQ parallel tracks has been minimized so as
to p~event further changes in the level of the ramp signal.
At that time, the transducer support is driven to maintain
the scanning path in substantial coincidence with the parallel
tracks.
More particularly, there is provided:
A tracking-error correcting sy5tem for use in
apparatus of the type wherein signals are recorded in parallel
tracks on a record medium, the system comprising:
transducer means for repeatedly scanning said record
medium in successive scanning paths which may not coincide with
said parallel tracks;
ramp signal generating means for generating a periodic
ramp signal of substantially constant amplitude and of a
duration equal to at least a portion of the time required for
said transducer means to traverse each of said scanning path;
level changing means coupled to said ramp signal
generating means for selectively changing the level of said
ramp signal in one direction;
signal level detecting means coupled to said trans-
ducer means for detecting the level of said signal reproduced
by said transducer means during successive scans of said
.~
A -5-
, .. . -
. . . - . ~ - . -,
- . . - . .
.. . . .
record medium;
comparing means for comparing with each other the
detected levels of the signal produced by said transducer means
at locations along the scanning paths thereof at respective
selected times and for controlling said level changing means
in re~ponse to the comparison of said detected levels;
drive signal generating means for generating a drive
signal having a component proportional to the selective
level-changed ramp signal; and
adjustable transducer support means for supporting
said transducer means proximate said record medium and in
scanning relation thereto, said support means receiving
said drive signal and being operative to displace said
transducer means transversely with respect to the direction
along each of said parallel tracks as a function of the
amplitude of said drive signal and thereby align each scanning
path of said transducer means coincidently with one of said
parallel track~.
There is also provided:
A tracking-error correcting system for use in :
video signal recording and/or reproducing apparatus of the
type wherein video signals are recorded in parallel record
tracks on a record medium movable relative to at least one
scanning transducer with at least a field of video information
recorded in each record track, said tracking-error correcting
system being operative to position each of said scanning
transducer along a scanning path made to coincide with a
record track in the event that the relative speed of movement
between the record medium and the transducer during reproducing
differs from said relative speed during recording and comprising:
means for driving said scanning transducer to repeatedly
scan said record medium in successive scanning paths for
~, . . .
y~, -5a-
,
. ' ' ,
reproducing said video signals recorded thereon;
ramp signal generating means for generating a ramp
signal of substantially constant amplitude for each scan of
said record medium by said transducer, said ramp signal
commencing substantially when said transducer commences
~canning;
variable gain amplifying means receiving said ramp
signal for variable amplifying said ramp signal so as to change
the level thereof in one direction;
gain control signal generating means for applying a
changing gain control signal to said variable gain amplifying
means to control the gain thereof, said changing gain control
signal being operative to change the gain of said variable
gain amplifying means for each successive scan of said
transducer;
correcting signal generating means responsive to said
amplified ramp signal for producing a correcting signal
operative to correct for a deviation between the scanning path
of said transducer and a record track;
adjustable support means for supporting said transducer
relative to said record medium as said transducer scans said
record medium, said support means receiving said correcting
signal to displace said transducer in a direction perpendicular
to the longitudinal direction of said track as a function of
the amplitude of said correcting signal so as to align said
scanning path coincidently with said record track; and
detecting means coupled to said transducer and responsive
to the video signals reproduced thereby to detect the deviation
of said scanning path with respect to said record track and to
detect when said scanning path substantially coincides with said
record track so as to terminate the change in said gain control
~' .
-5b-
~; :
.. : . ....... .
signal, whereby the gain of said variable gain ~mplifying means
is maintained at a constant level.
In the tracking-error system, as defined in the
previous paragraph, the system may further comprise:
second ramp signal generating means for generating a
second ramp signal of substantially constant amplitude for
each scan of said record medium by said second transducer,
said second ramp signal commencing substantially when said
second transducer commences scanning;
second variable gain amplifying means receiving said
second ramp signal for variably amplifying said second ramp
Rignal so as to change the level thereof in one dir~ction;
second gain control signal generating means for
applying a second changing gain control signal to said second
variable gain amplifying means to control the gain thereof,
said second changing gain control signal being operative to
change the gain of said second variable gain amplifying means
for each successive scan of said second transducer;
second corre~.ting signal generating means responsive
to said second amplified ramp signal for producing a second
correcting signal operative to correct for a deviation between
the scanning path of said second transducer and a record track;
second adjustable support means for supporting said
second transducer relative to said record medium as said
second transducer scans said record medium, said second
support means receiving said second correcting signal to
displace said second transducer in a direction perpendicular
to the longitudinal direction of said track as a function of
the amplitude o said second correcting signal so as to align.
3Q the scanning path of said second transducer coincidently
with said record track; and
-5c-
,
second detecting means coupled to said second transducer
and responsive to the video signals reproduced thereby to
detect- the deviation of the scanning path of said second
transducer with respect to said record track and to detect when
said C;canning path substantially coincides with said record
track so as to terminate the change in said second gain
control signal, whereby the gain of said second variable gain
amplifying means is maintained at a constant level.
~P~IEF DESCRIPTION OF TH~3 DRA~INGS
The following detailed description, given by way of
example, will best be understood in conjunction with the
accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. lA is a schematic top view of rotary head recording/
reproducing apparatus;
FIG. lB is a schematic side view of the apparatus
shown in FI G . lA;
FIGS. 2A-2D represent parallel tracks on a record
medium and the relative position of a head scanning path with
respect thereto;
FIGS. 3A-3C are schematic side views of a piezo ceramic
support member which can be used with the present invention;
FIG. 4A iS a side view of one embodiment of a head
support assembly which can be used with the present invention;
FIG. 4B is a bottom view of the assembly shown in
FIG. 4A;
FIG. 5 is a partial block, partial schematic diagram
of a tracking-error correcting system;
-Sd-
`~
FIGS. 6A-6s are waveform diagrams which are useful in
unde!rstanding the operation of the system shown in FIG. 5;
FIGS. 7A-7E are waveform diagrams which are useful in
unde!rstanding the operation of the system shown in FIG. 5;
FIGS. 8A-8E are waveform diagrams which are useful in
understanding the operation of the system shown in ~IG. S;
FIGS. 9A-9E are waveform diagrams which are useful in
understanding the operation of the system shown in FIG. 5;
FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment
in accordance with the present invention;
FIGS. llA-llM are waveform diagrams which are useful
in understanding the operation of the system shown in FIG. 10;
FIG. 12 shows a record track on a record medium and
further shows scanning paths which deviate from that track a~d
which are adjusted in accordance with the system shown in FIG. 10;
FIG. 13 is a perspective view of head support structure
which can be used with the'present invention;
FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a damping circuit which
can be used with the assembly shown in FIG. 13; and
FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram of one element shown in
the block diagram of FIG. 14.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The following detailed description, given by way of
example, will best be understood in conjunction with the accompany-
ing drawings. Fo.r the purpose of simplification and to facilitate
an understanding of the present invention, the following description
relates to the environment of a video signal recorder and, more
: particularly, to a VTR. However, the problems to which the present
invention is addressed, and the solution to those problems, as dis-
closed herein, are not limited solely to video signal recording
ap~aratus. Hence, it should be understood that this description
also is applicable to other types of analog signal recGrding devices,
to digital signal recording devices and to other rotary head scanning
appcLratus which can be used for recording, reproducing, or other
purposes.
Turning now to FIG. lA, there is schematically illustrated
a top view of a typical rotary head scanning device, such as a ~TR.
As is conventional, this device is formed with two magnetic record/
playback heads la, lb which are adapted for rotation about a central
axis. A guide drum 2 is adapted to receive a record medium, such as
tape 3, wrapped helically thereabout for at least 180. Heads la and
lb may ~e mounted on diametrically opposed arms which are rotated
so as to scan successive, parallel, skewed tracks across tape 3.
Thus, heads la and lb rotate in the direction indicated by the arrow
while tape 3 is advanced so as to record signal information thereon.
Alternatively, and as shown in FIG. lB, guide drum 2 ma~
be formed of two drums 2a, 2b, disposed in face-to-face configuration
and spaced apart so as to define a scanning gap therebetween. Tape 3
is helically wrapped about a portion of the surface of guide drum 2
so that the record tracks recorded by heads la, 1~ are skewed rela-
tive to the longitudinal axis of the tape. When two heads are used,
it is appreciated that alternate tracks are recorded thereb~. That
is, first head la records one track then head lb records the next
adjacent track, then head la records the following track, and so on.
In the alternative structure of FIG. lB, heads la and lb are mounted
on one of drums 2a, 2b, this drum being rotated relative to the
other drum such that the heads traverse the aforementioned scanning
paths.
--7--
., . , . ............. , , ~ ,: ~ -
: -:
During a signal recording operation and during a "normal"
signal reproducing operation, the relative speed of tape 3 with respect
to heads la and lb is the same. Suitable servo control circuitry
(not shown) generally is provided to account for relatively small
changes in tape-drive and head-drive motor speeds, tape shrinkage,
tape stretching, differences from one apparatus to another, and the
like. To this effect, a head-position generator is pro~ided to
generate pulses when heads la, lb rotate into predetermined position,
such as when head la first contacts tape 3, that is, when this hea~
com~ences its scanning path~ Typically, the head-position generator
is formed of a magnetic element 4 which is secured to the shaft which
rotates heads la, lb so as to rotate with these heads and to pass a
fixedly disposed magnetic pick-up sensor 5 for generating a position
detecting pulse. As is understood, in typical video recording appa-
ratus, each head records a complete field in a respective recordtrack, and these heads are rotated at a speed of 30 rps. Conse-
quently, the position detecting pulses generated by pick-up sensor 5
have a frequency of 30 Hz.
Desirably, the video signal recording/reproducing apparatus
exhibits ~oth a normal reproducing mode and a "non-normal" reproducing
mode. In the former, the record medium is advanced at the same speed
during a reproducing operation as during a recording operation. How-
ever, in the latter, although heads la, lb are rotated at the same
rate as during recording, the speed of the record medium is changed.
Thus, in a non-normal reproducing mode, the relative speed of move-
ment between the record medium and the heads differs from that during
recording. Typical examples of such non-normal reproducing modes are
the "stop" mode wherein the record medium is stopped so that the same
record track is scanned repetitively by the heads; the "slow-motion"
mode wherein the record medium is advanced at a fraction of its normal
-8-
.
speed such that the heads scan substantially the same track a plural
number of times; and the "fast-motion" mode wherein the record medium
is advanced at a much faster speed than during recording. A common
problem in each of these non-normal reproducing modes is that the
scanning path traversed by the heads no longer coincides with the
previously recorded record track. This, of course, is due to the
change in the relative speed of movement of the record medium with
respect to the scanning heads during such non-normal reproducing
mode as compared to the normal recording speed. Because of such
deviation, the heads are not aligned correctly with the record track
and, therefore, may pick up noise from the guard bands separating
successive record tracks or crosstalk from adjacent tracks. ~lthough
this problem is associated with all of the non-normal reproducing
modes, a~ aforesaid, it best can be appreciated by considering the
"stop" mode.
Turning to FIG. 2A, there is shown a plurality of parallel
tracks T which are recorded on tape 3 during a recording operation.
Since tape 3 is advanced in the direction indicated by arrow A, and
since the scanning heads, such as head la, scan across the surface
of tape 3 in the direction indicated by arrow B, it is appreciated
that parallel tracks T are formed which are skewed relative to the
longitudinal axis of the tape. During a normal reproducing operation,
tape 3 once again is moved in the direction of arrow A at the same
speed as during recording. Also, heads la, lb are moved in the
direction B, also at the same speed as during recording. Hence, the
scanning path of, for example, head la during a normal reproducing
mode is the same as the scanning path of that head during a recording
mode. Consequently, the scanning path of head la coincides with tracks J
T, whereby the previously recorded video signals are reproduced
accurately.
. ... . . .. ..
-
.
Let it now be assumed that in a "stop" reproducing mode,
tape 3 is stopped such that head la first contacts the tape at a
location intermediate successive tracks T, as shown in FIG. 2B.
Since tape 3 is stopped, the scanning path traversed by head la
no longer coincides wi~h the parallel tracks, as shown. Accordingly,
in the assumption represented in FIG. 2B, the scanning path i5 in-
clined, or angularly disposed with respect to a record track T
such that only the terminal portion of the scanning path coincides
with the terminal portion of the record track. If tape 3 had stopped
such that the beginning portion of the scanning path coincides with
the beginning portion of record track T, the scanning path, shown
as P2 in FIG. 2C, would deviate from record track T, as shown. Still
further, if tape 3 had stopped such that the central portion of the
scanning path, shown as P3 in FIG. 2D, coincides with the central
portion of record txack T, the deviation between the scanning path
and record track is as represented in that figure. Although heads
la, lb traverse the respective scanning paths Pl, P2 and P3 depending
upon the particular position at which tape 3 is stopped, as shown in
FIGS. 2B, 2C and 2D, respectively, the signals reproduced by the
heads may not be accurate reproductions of the recorded signals
because of the illustrated deviations between the scanning path
and the record tracks. Thus, when one of the heads deviates to one
or the other side of the record track which is to be scanned, noise
or crosstalk signals from the guard band or adiacent track are picked
up and distort the reproduced signals. The purpose of the present
invention is to minimize these deviations. It is thought that if
heads la and lb are mounted on adjustable support members, then the
position of each head relative to a record track T can be changed
while the head scans the tape such that the scanning path thereof
coincides with ~e record track.
--10--
- '~' .' .
In a preferred emb~diment, each adjustable head support
assembly is formed of a piezoelectric member which is responsive to
a voltage applied thereto so as to bend or deflect or in direction
pexpendicular to the surface thereof. A head support assembly con-
sturcted of piezoelectric members is described in U.S. Patent No.
3,787,616.
A head support assembly which can be used with the present
invention is shown schematically in FIGS. 3A-3C. This assembly is
formed of a pair of leaf members 7 and 9, each being constructed
of piezo-ceramic material whose directions of polarization are repre-
sented by arrows C and D, respectively. The opposite surfaces of
piezo-ceramic leaf member 7 are plated with electrodes 6a and 6b r
respectively; and the opposite surfaces of piezo-ceramic member 9
likewise are plated with electrodes 8a and 8b, respectively. If
piezo-ceramic members 7 and 9 overlie each other such that elec-
trodes 6b and 8a are in contact, and if a variable voltage is
applied across the respective members, as sho~n in FIG. 3B, then
piezo-ceramic member 7 tends to expand in its lengthwise direction
while piezo-ceramic member 9 tends to compress. As a result of
these oppositely-acting forces, the head support assembly bends,
or deflects, by an amount which is a function of the strength of
the electric field applied across each member. If the polarit~ of
the electric field is reversed, the direction in which the assem~ly
bends, or deflects, correspondingly is reversed.
If the direction of polarization of the piezo-ceramic
members is made opposite to each other, that is, if electroae 6a of
member 7 now contacts electrode 8a of member 9, the manner in which
voltage is applied to the assembly to effect a displacement thereof
is as shown in FIG. 3C. Hence, a voltage need not be applied
to the electxodes in common contact with each other. Instead, if a
.
--11--
:., ,, :, : . , ~ .
bias voltage is applied to electrode 8b and if a variable voltage
is applied to electrode 6b, then the illustrated assembly will bend
in a downward direction if the variable voltage is less than the
bias voltage, and will bend in an upward direction if the variable
voltage exceeds the bias voltage. For convenience, it is assumed
that the bias voltage has a magnitude Vo/2 while the drive voltage
is variable between 0 and VO.
A practical embodiment of a head support assembly formed
of the leaf members in FIGS. 3A-3C is illustrated in FIGS. ~A and 4B~
which are side and bottom views, respectively. A mounting base 10
receives the piezo-ceramic members which may be secured thereto by
a suitable adhesive 11. The leaf members extend outward from base 10
and magnetic head la or lb is mounted on the free end thereof. Mount-
ing base 10 may be secured to the rotary arms of the rotating assembly
for the magnetic heads or, alternatively, may be secured to , for
example, the bottom surface of guide drum 2a (FIG. lB). In either
event, the leaf members extend in a direction outward from the rotary
axis of the hea&s.
Preferably, damping members 13a and 13b are provided to
damp free or resonant oscillation of the leaf members which may be
caused by the forces exerted in response to the bending voltages
applied to the respective electrodes. For example, these forces may
bend the leaf members from a starting position to an ending position
as the head mounted thereon traverses its scanning path, and then
return the leaf members to their starting position in preparation
for another scan. The damping members are intended to damp oscilla-
tion of the leaf members caused by this bending. Accordingly, damp-
ing members 13a and 13b are attached to tabs 12a and 12b, respectively,
these tabs extending from damping member mounting plate 14 which, as
shown, extends outwardly from mounting base 10. Desirable damping
-12-
act;on is achieved when damping members 13a and 13b are pressea
between the sides of the leaf members and tabs 12a and 12b with
suil~able force to prevent oscillation but not to prevent deflection
of lhe leaf mem~ers in response to the voltage applied thereto. As
also shown, conducting leads are secured to the respective electrodes
of the leaf members for receiving the deflecting voltage.
During the recording operation, heads la and lb should
remain in a normal, undeflected position. Hence, during recording,
a deflecting or drive voltage is not applied to the head support
assembly. However, during a non-normal reproducing mode, it is
preferred that a drive voltage be applied. For example, if the
scanning path relative to a record track corresponds to scanning
path Pl (FIG. 2B), the drive voltage should decrease from a maximum
level at the start of the scanning path to a zero level at the end
of the scanning path. If the scanning path relative to a record
track corresponds to scanning path P2 (FIG. 2C), then the drive
voltage applied to the head support assembly should increase from
a zero level at the start of the scanning path to a maximum level
at the end of the scanning path. If the scanning path relative to
a record track corresponds to scanning path P3 (FIG. 2D), then the
drive voltage should decrease from a maximum level at the start of
the scanning path to a zero level at the mid-point thereo~ and then
increase to a maximum level at the end of the scanning path. A suit-
able drive voltage for deflecting the head support assembly to correct
the scanning path deviations shown in FIGS. 2B-2D should have a ramp
or triangular waveform. For the particular deviation shown in FIG. 2D,
and for piezo-ceramic leaf assembly shown in FIG. 3C, the ramp wave-
form applied as the variable drive voltage V should have a mid-pont
amplitude equal to the bias voltage ~Vo/2).
-13-
, - ~
App~ratus for generating a suitable drive voltage for
application to the piezo-ceramic leaf assembly shown in FIG. 3C for
correcting deviations in the scanning path relati~e to a record track
duriny a non-normal reproducing mode is shown in FIG. 5. The illus-
trated apparatus is comprised of an envelope detector 22 having aninput adapted to receive the signals reproduced by, for example,
head la and applied to input terminal 20. Envelope detector 22 is
coupled to a level discriminator 23 which, in turn, is coupled through
a NAND gate 25 to a monostable multivibrator, or one-shot circuit 26.
Another input of NAND gate 25 is coupled to a monostable multivi~rator
24 whose trigger input is adapted to receive head change-o~er pulses
(to be described) applied to input terminal 21.
Monostable multivibrator 26 is of the re-triggerable type
having a pair of output terminals Q and ~, respectively. These
output terminals are coupled to a bias signal generator 27 which
includes a storage device, shown as capacitor 28, which is adapted
to have a bias signal stored thereacross, which, as will be explained,
determines the intersection of the scanning path traversed by head la
with the approximate mid-point of a record track T. That is, the
bias signal stored across capacitor 28 is controlled to have a value
establishing scanning path P3 shown in FIG. 2D. In particular, bias
signal generator 27 is comprised of a charging circuit formed of tran-
sistor 29 whose collector-emitter circuit is connected in series
between a source of operating voltage Vcc and, through a switching
circuit 31, to capacitor 28; and also a discharging circuit formed
of transistor 30 whose collector-emitter circuit is connected in
series, and through switching circuit 21, between capacitor 28 and
a reference potential, such as ground. The base electrode of tran-
sistor 29 is coupled to output terminal Q of monostable multivibrator
26 and the base electrode of transistor 30 is coupled to output
terminal Q.
The bias signal stored across capacitor 28 is supplied
through an amplifier to a combining circuit 35, such as a mixing
circuit, summing circuit, or the like. Another input to combining
circuit 35 is supplied thereto by a ramp signal generator 37, such
as a triangular wave generator, this generator being coupled to
input terminal 21 and synchronized with the aforementioned head
change-over pulses. As shown, a switching circuit, or gate 38
selectively applies the ramp signal generated by ramp signal gen-
erator 37 to combining circuit 35. The output of this combining
circuit is coupled to an output terminal 39 whereat the deflecting,
or drive voltage is derived.
Switch circuits 31 and 38 are adapted to be actuated
when a particular non-normal reproducing mode is initiated. For
this purpose, each switch circuit includes a control input coupled
lS in common to a monostable multivibrator 32 which, in turn, is
triggered when a switch 33 is closed. As one example thereof,
switch 33 may be closed when a "stop" mode is selected. When mono-
stable multivibrator 32 is triggered, it generates an output pulse
of predetermined duration for closing switch circuit 31 and opening
~0 switch circuit 38 for that duration. At the termination of this
pulse, switch circuit 31 is ope~ed and switch circuit 38 is closed.
The operation of the system illustrated in FIG. 5 will
be described with the assumption that the video recording/reproducing
apparatus is to be operated in its "stop" mode. Thus, movement of
the record medium is stopped and heads la, lb (FIGS. lA, lB~ scan
the record medium. As is now understood, the scanning path traversed
by each head deviates from the previously recorded record track.
Nevertheless, the video signals reproduced by, for example, head la
are applied to input terminal 20. The specific format of these video
æignals forms no part of the present invention, and such signals may
-15-
be frequency-modulated video signals, or chrominance signals,
luminance signals, or composite color tel~vision signals. Envelope
detector 22 produces an output signal proportional to the detected
envelope or signal level of the reproduced video signals. Hence,
if head la passes over a portion of a record track T, the output
of envelope detector 22 is greater than when head la passes over,
for example, a guard band. Level discriminator 23 receives the
output signal from envelope detector 22 and compares this signal
to a threshold level Vt. In one embodiment, if the envelope-detected
signal is less than this threshold level, level discriminator 23
produces a signal of relatively higher magni~ude, such as a binary
"1". Conversely, if the envelope-detected signal level exceeds the
threshold level, level discriminator 23 produces a signal having a
relatively lower magnitude, such as a binary "0".
As mentioned above, head change-over pulses are applied
to input terminal 21. These pulses, shown in FIG. 6A, coincide with
the scanning of the record medium by the respective heads la and lb.
As an example, if a head-position pulse is generated by, for example,
detector 5 (FIG. lB1, this head-position pulse may trigger a mono-
stable multivibrator (not shown) to produce the change-over pulses
SO shown in FIG. 6A. Preferably, this pulse has a 50~ duty cycle
such that the duration of the positive portion is coextensive with
the scanning of the record medium by head la, and the duration of
the negative portion is coextensive with the scanning of the record
medium by head lb. The positive transition of change-over pulses SO
triggers monostable multivibrator 24 to produce an output pulse of
predetermined duration.
The output of level discriminator 23 and the output of
monostable multivibrator 24 both are supplied to NAND gate 25. ~ence,
this NAND gate produces a binary "0" if the output pulse produced by
-16-
monostable multivibrator 24 coincides in time with the binary "1"
produced by the level discriminator when the envelope-detected signal
level is less than the threshold level vt. This binary "O" triggers
monostable multivibrator ~6.
When monostable multivibrator 26 assumes it stable state,
a binary "1" is produced at its Q output, thereby turning on tran-
sistor 29. However, when this monostable multivibrator is triggeredt
it assumes its unstable state and supplies a binary "1" from its Q
output to turn on transistor 30. For a purpose soon to become appar-
ent, monostable multivibrator 26 has a time constant which is greater
than a frame interval, and is retriggerable so as to re-start a
timing operation.
Ramp signal generator 37 is triggered in response to the
positive transition in change-over pulses SO. The ramp signal gen-
erated by generator 37 is o~ constant amplitude. For the purpose of
this description, a "constant amplitude" ramp signal means that the
amplitude of the ramp signal increases continuously and at a constant
rate with no abrupt changes, or steps, in its amplitude. The duration
of this ramp signal is substantially equal to the time ~or head la
to traverse its scanning path. At the conclusion of the duration
of this ramp signal, the signal may return abruptly or rapidly to
its initial level or, alternatively, may gradually return to its
initial level so as to present a complementary ramp waveform. If
it is assumed that the ramp signal has a positive slope, then the
complementary ramp signal will have a negative slope, the two signals
thus forming a triangular waveform. As may be recognized by one of
ordinary skill in the art, ramp signal generator may be of conven-
tional construction and may include one integrating circuit so as
to form a ramp wavefoxm, or two integrating circuits so as to form
3~ a triangular waveform. For the purpose of this discussion, it will
-17-
. .... .........
--
. .... : , . : - . -: : , . : -
be assumed that the ramp signal is of triangular waveform such
as "1 shown in solid lines in FIG. 6.
Accordingly, the deflecting or drive signal applied to
output terminal 39 incluaes the ramp signal component produced by
ramp signal yenerator 37 and a bias signal component, such as the
DC hias signal stored across capacitor 28. These components are
added in combining circuit 35.
If the piezo-ceramic head support assembly corresponds
to the embodiment shown in FIG. 3C, the leaf members bend in one
direction when the drive signal is less than ~e bias voltage VO/Z
and bend in the opposite direction when the drive signal is greater
than this bias voltage. If the bias voltage is equal to the mid-
level amplitude of ramp signal Sl, then the leaf assembly will be
deflected in one direction to a greater extent at the start of this
ramp signal, which deflection is reduced to zero at the mid-point
of the ramp signal ana then gradually increased in the opposite
direction until maximum deflection is reached at the termination
of the ramp signal. Of course, during the negative portion (or
slope) of the ramp signal, the leaf assembly is similarly deflected.
but in the opposite directions. Thus, in order to correct the devia-
tion shown in FIG. 2B, and assuming that the bias voltage VQ/2 is of
the magnitude shown in FIG. 6B, ramp signal S1 should ha~e the wave-
form shown in broken lines in FIG. 6B. This means that head la, for
example, is deflected by a maximum amount at the start of its scanning
path, this deflection decreasing to zero at the end of the scanning
path. Similarly, in order to correct the deviation shown in FIG~ 2C,
ramp signal Sl should have the waveform shown by the one-dot chain
line of FIG. 6B. With this waveform, the deflection of head la in-
creases from a zero level at the start of its scanning path to a
: 30 maximum level at the end of the scanning path. Also, in order to
-lB-
correct the deviation shown in FI~,. 2D, ramp si~nal Sl should
have the waveform shown by solid lines in FIG. 6. With this
wave!form, the deflection of head la decreases from a maximum
leve!l at the start of the scanning path to a zero level at the
mid-point of the scanning path and then increases in the opposite
direction to a maximum level at the end of ~he scanning path. With
waveforms of the type shown in FIG. 6B, the respective scanning
paths of head la, as shown in FIGS. 2B, 2C and 2D, respectively,
are adjusted so as to coincide with record track T. ~f course,
the particular ramp signal waveform is dependent upon the position
at which tape 3 is stopped which, in ~urn, determines the starting
point of the scanning path.
In the foregoin~ description, the particular level of
ramp signal Sl, that is, the respective levels shown by the broken
line, one-dot chain line and solid line waveforms shown in FIG. 6B,
is d~termined by the bias signal stored across capacitor 2~. If it
is assumed that the mid-point or average amplitude of the ramp signal
produced by ramp signal generator 37 is zero, then the addition of
the bias signal to this ramp signal establishes the particular level
of the latter as applied to the piezo-ceramic leaf assembly. That
is, and assuming that the solid horizontal reference line in FIG. 6B
is-equal to a bias signal voltage of Vo/2, the ramp signal Sl will
exhibit the wave~orm shown by the broken line if the bias signal
across capacitor 28 is less than Vo/2, the ramp signal will exhibit
the waveform shown by the solid line if the bias signal across capa-
citor 28 is equal to Vo/2, and the ramp signal will exhibit the wave-
form shown by the one-dot-chain line if the bias signal across capa-
citor 28 is greater than Vo/2.
--19--
The manner in which the bias signal is produced across
capa,citor 28 for each of the scanning path deviation conditions shown
in F'IGS. 2B, 2C and 2D is explained with reference to FIGS. 7, 8 and 9,
respectively. FIG. 7A illustrates the envelope-detected signal produced
by detector 22. As is apparent, the envelope-detected signal level
is less than threshold level Vt at the beginning of the scanning path,
and then, as the scanning path approaches record track T, the envelope-
detected signal level increases. Accordingly, level discriminator 23
produces an output pulse as shown in FIG. 7B. That is t this pulse is
a binary "1" until the envelope-detected signal level exceeds threshold
level Vt. Since a positive transition is present in the change-over
pulses SO at the beginning of the scanning path, monostable multi-
vibrator 24 produces the output pulse shown in FIG. 7C. When the
pulses of FIGS. 7B and 7C are applied to NAND gate 25, the NAND gate
supplies the pulse shown in FIG. 7D to trigger monostable multivibrator
26, as shown in FIG. 7E. Thus, transistor 30 is turned on and tran-
sistor 29 is turned off. If it is assumed that a "stop" mode has
been selected such that switch 33 is close.d and monostable multi-
vibrator 22 is triggered, switch circuit 31 also is clos.ed so that
the voltage which had been stored across capacitor 28 now is dis-
charged through sw.itch 31 and conducting transistor 30. The collector
resistor connected to transistor 30 combines with the capacitance of
capacitor 28 to establish a discharge time constant. Thus, the
bias signal across capacitor 28 is reduced, and this reduced bias sig-
nal is supplied through combining circuit 35 to output terminal 39 asthe drive signal for the piezo-ceramic leaf assembly shown in FIG~ 3C.
As the bias signal across capacitor 28 is reduced, it has
the effect of deflecting the head support assembly such that, when
viewed in FIG. 2B, the scanning path of the head is shifted from right
to left until it obtains the relative position shown, for example, as
scanning path P2 in FIG. 2C. However, so long as the scanning path P
-20-
, .
is such that the envelope-detected signal level produced at the begin-
ning portion of the scannin~ path is less than Vt, retriygerable mono-
stable multivibrator 26 maintains transistor 30 on to continue to
discharge capacitor 28.
When the scanning path of, for example, head la is as repre-
sented by the scanning path P2 in FIG. 2C, the envelope-detected signal
produced by envelope detector 22 appears as shown in FI~. 8A. Since
this envelope-detected signal level remains above threshold level Vt
until the end portion of the scanning path, level discriminator 23
produces the output pulse shown in FIG. 8B. There~ore, NAND gate 25
is not supplied with coinciding pulse signals and, therefore, supplies
a binary "1" to monostable mul~ivibrator 26, this monostable multi
vibrator remaining in its stable state so as to supply a binary "1"
~rom its Q output to transistor 29. This turns on transistor 2~ so as
lS to charge capacitox 28. Hence, the voltage across this capacitor in-
CreaSe5 80 as to increase the bias signal which is supplied through
combining circuit 35 to output terminal 39 as the drive signal for the
piezo-ceramic leaf assembly. As this drive signal now increases, the
head support member is deflected in a direction so as to shift scanning
path P2 from left to right, as viewed in FIG. 2C, tending to return
this scanning path to the path illustrated as Pl in FIG. 2B.
Therefore, as capacitor 28 i5 charged and discharged,
depending upon the relative location of the scanning path (Pl or P2)
with respect to record track T, the average bias signal across capa-
citor 28 tends to deflect the head support member to cause the scanning
path to intersect with the record track at approximately the mid-point
thereof, as shown in FIG. 2D.
If it is assumed that when the "stop" mode is selecte~.,.
tape 3 is stopped such that the scanning path is as represented by
path P3 shown in FIG. 2D, the envelope-detected signal produced by
envelope detector 22 is as shown in FIG. 9A. Since this envelope-
-21-
.
- ~ - :,. . . . .
,
detected signal level exceeds threshold level Vt, level discriminator
23 does not apply a pulse signal to NAND gate 25. Hence, monosta~le
multivibrator 26 remains in its stable state to apply a binary "1"
to transistor 29. Consequently, capacitor 28 is charged in a manner
similar to the charging of capacitor 28 described with respect to
FIGS. 2C and 8. Thus, as the bias signal increases, scanning path
P3 is shifted relative to track T from left to right until the
envelope-detected signal produced by envelope detector 22 is reduced
below threshold level Vt. At that time, monostable multivibrator 26
is triggered so as to turn off transistor 29 and turn on transistor
30. This, in turn, discharges capacitor 28, resulting in a shift
from right to left of the scanning path. Thus, it is appreciated
that scanning path P3 effectively fluctuates about ~he position
shown in FIG. 2D.
In view of the operation described above, it can be seen
that the bias signal across capacitor 28 assumes the level Vo/2,
shown as the solid reference line in FIG. 6B. Thus, because of
this bias signal, which is the only drive signal applied to the
head support assembly when switch 33 is closed and monostable
multivibrator 32 produces its output pulse, the head support
assembly is deflected so as to establish scanning path P3 as shown
in FIG. 2D.
At the conclusion of the pulse produce~ by monostable
multivibrator 32, switch circuit 31 opens and switch circuit 38
closes. Thus, the bias signal is maintained across capacitor 28_
That is, both the charge and discharge paths are disconnected there-
from by the opening of switch 31. At the same time, the closing of
switch 38 supplies the. ramp signal Sl produced by ramp si.gnal gen-
erator 37 to combining circuit 35. This means that the drive signal
now applied to the head support assembly is as shown by the solid
.. . . . : .':
. . ~ . .
. -
lines in FIG. 6s. Consequently, scanning path P3 is ad]usted in
response to this drive signal so as to coincide with record track T.
That is, during the first half of the scanning path, the drive signal
is less than Vo/2 so as to deflect the head support assembly in a
direction which shifts scanning path P3 from right to left as viewed
in FIG. 2D. Also, during the second half of the scanning path, the
drive signal is greater than Vo/2 so as to deflect the head support
assembly in the opposite direction whereby the second half of scan-
ning path P3 is shifted from left to right.
In the system shown in FIG. 5, the amplitude of the ramp
signal produced by ramp signal generator 37 is constant, as shown in
FIG. 6B. This amplitude is selected as a function of the maximum
deviation between the beginning and end portions of scanning path
P3 (FIG. 2D) and track T. It is this amplitude which is needed to
deflect the head support assembly sufficiently so as to bring scan-
ning path P3 into coincidence with track T. However, the piezo-
ceramic material may alter its response to the drive signal appliea
thereto as a function of aging, temperature, and the like. This
means that the ramp signal Sl of constant amplitude may not be suf-
ficient in some instances to adjust the scanning path to coincidewith the record track. Consequently, even with the system sho~n
in FIG. 5, there still is the possibility of a tracking error during
non-normal reproducing modes. Furthermore, there is the possibility
that the bias signal stored across capacitor 28 may not be suffic$ent
to deflect the head support assembly so as to establish scanning
path P3 in the configuration shown in FI~. 2D, that is, wherein this
scanning path intersects record track T at approximately the mid-
point of the record track. Yet another disadvantage of the illustrated
system is that the response time, that is, the time required to correct
for tracking errors, may not be sufficiently fast. That is, the
-23-
. .
. : ~
,
,. ' ' . ' ,
tracking error may be present for a numher of successive scans.
The embodiment shown in FIG. 10 overcomes the aforenotea
disadvantages which may be associated with the system of FIG. 5.
In E~IG. 10, many of the same elements are identified by the same
reference numerals used in FIG. 5. Thus, envelope detector 22,
level discriminator 23, monostable multivibrator 24, NAND gate 25,
monostable multivibrator 26, bias signal generator 27, monostable
multivibrator 32, combining circuit 35, ramp signal generator 37
and switch circuit 36 are substantially similar. In the interest
of simplification, further descript;on of these components is not
provided.
The function of the improved system shown in FIG. 10
is to selectively change the'level of the ramp signal produced by
ramp signal generator 37. As used in this description, to change
the level of the ramp siynal means to increase or decrease the
amplitude of the ramp signal abruptly, or discontinuously, at some
point and, after such level change,' to maintain a constant amplitude
of the ramp signal at the new, or changed level. That i5, by chang-
ing the level of the ramp signal, the difference between the'minimum
and maximum portions thereof is changed. To increase'the'level o~
the ramp signal is to increase this difference; and to decre.ase the
level of the ramp signal is to decrease this difference~ In accord-
ance with the system shown in FIG. 10, the'level of ramp signal S
is selectively changed as a function of the deviation between the
~5 scanning path and the record track. That is, relatively large
changes in the-amplitude of the ramp signal are made when the.
deviation is large, but thes~e changes in the level of the ramp
signal are made smaller as the deviation is reduced. In th.is
manner, tracking errors can be corrected rapidly and accurately
and, moreover, such errors can be corrected even in the event o~
.
-2~1-
.
.
'- ` ' ' . . . ' ', " ' . ' ' " ' ' :' ' ` ~ : ~ , '
~ h~
aging or temperature changes which may affect the piezo-ceramic
leaf assembly.
With specific reference to FIG. 10, the improved
tracking-error correcting system includes sampling circuit 43,
which may comprise a conventional sample-and-hold circuit, a
storage circuit 48, which also may comprise a sample-and-hold
circuit, a comparator 45, a staircase generator ~2 and a level
changing circuit 41. Sampling circuit 43 is adapted to sample
the level of the envelope-detected signal produced by envelope
detector Z2 at a predetermined time, or location along the scan-
nin~ path traversed by head la. Storage circuit 48 is adapted to
store the level sampled by æampling circuit 43, and comparator 45
is adapted to compare a presently sampled envelope-detected signal
level with the immediately preceding sample of the envelope-detected
signal. Accordingly, the signal input of sampling circuit 43 is
coupled to envelope detector 22 and a sampling pulse input terminal
is coupled to a monostable multivibrator 44 for receiving a sampling
pulse S2. The signal input of storage circuit 48 is coupled to an
output of sampling circuit 43, and the storage circui.t also includes
a sample pulse input terminal coupled to a monostable multivibrator
47 for receiving a sampling pulse S3. The signal outputs of sampling
circuit 43 and storage circuit 48 are coupled to respective. ~nputs
of comparator 45. Although FIG. 10 shows a separate signal output
of sampling circuit 43 coupled to the signal input of storage circuit
48, it should be xeadily appreciated that the signal output of this
sampling circuit which is coupled to comparator 45 also may be coupled
to the signal input of storage circuit 48.
Monostable multivibrators 44 and 47 are coupled to input
terminal 21.and are adapted to be triggered to their respective un-
stable states in response to the head change-over pulses S~ whlch
J~ ` ' A
are received at terminal 21. More particularly, monostable multi-
vibrator 44 is triggered by the positive transition in change-over
pulse SO so as to produce a positive samplin~ pulse Sz of predeter-
mined duration. Monostable multivibrator 47 is triggered by the
negative transition in change-over pulse SO and is adapted to produce
sampling pulse S3 of predetermined duration. Monostable multivibrators
44 and 47 also include complementary sampling pulse output terminals
whereat sampling pulses complementary to sampling pulses S2 and S3,
respectively, are produced. These complementary sampling pulses are
represented as pulses S2 and S3, respectively.
Comparator 45 may comprise a conventional amplitude or
level comparing circuit, such as a differential amplifier. As one-
example of the signal produced by comparator 45, if the signal level
sampled by sampling circuit 43 exceeds the signal level stored in
storage circuit 48, a relatively higher signal level, for example,
a binary "1" is produced. Conversely, if the signal level sampled
by sampling circuit 43 is less than the signal level stored in storage
circuit 48, comparator 45 produces a binary "0". The output of com-
parator 45 is coupled to a storage circuit 52 which, for example, may
comprise a sampling circuit of a type similar to sampling circuit 43.
In this regard, complementary sampling pulse S2are applied to a samp-
ling pulse input of storage circuit 52 from monostable multivibrator
44. Storage circuit 52 is coupled to staircase generator 42 so as
to supply a selective enable/inhibit signal to the staircase generator.
That is, if a binary "1" is stored in storage circuit 52, staircase
generator 42 is enabled to continue the production of the staircase
waveform. However, if storage circuit 52 stores a binary ~0", further
operation of staircase generator 42 is inhibited, and the output
level produced thereby is maintained at its output terminal. As
shown, the input of staircase generator 42 is coupled to terminal 21
.
'
and is responsive to the positive transition of chang~-over pulse
SO to increment the output signal produ~ed thereby. That is J at
the beginning of each scanning path traversed by head la, the ampli-
tude of the staircase signal produced by the staircase generator is
increased by a predetermined increment such that, over a period of
time, the staircase waveform is produced having successive step
increases.
The output of staircase generator 42 is coupled through
a non-linear circuit 53 to a control input of level changing circuit
41. The purpose and operation of non-linear circuit 53 will be
described below. As mentioned previously, level changing circuit
41 is adapted to change the level of the ramp signal produced by
ramp signal generator 37. Accordingly, level changing circuit 41
may comprise a gain-controlled amplifier whose gain is detexmined
by the staixcase control signal applied ~o its control input. That
is, the gain of this amplifier will be increased by an amount propor-
tional to each step increase in the amplitude of the staircase signal.
As an alternative, the gain-controlled amplifier may b~ of the type
', whose gain is decreased by an amount proportional to each step in-
crease in the amplitude of the staircase signal. As a further
alternative, level changing circuit 41 may comprise a controllable
attenuator who~e attenuation either is selectiveIy increased or
decreased by an amount proportional to the step increase in the
amplitude of the staircase signal which is applied thereto as a
control signal. Thus, it may be appreciated that if level changing
circuit 41 comprises a gain-controlled amplifier or a controllable,
attenuator, the function of the level changing circuit is to change
the level of the ramp signal in one direction in response to the
control signal applied thereto from staircase generator 42. For
the purpose of this description, a change in the leveI of the ramp
-27-
signal in one direction means that the Level of the ramp signal
is :increased only or, in the alternative, is decreased only in
response to the control signal. Thus, as the amplitude of the
stalrcase signal increases in successive s-teps, the level of the
ramp signal correspondingly increases (or decreases) successively~
The output of level changing circuit 41 is coupled via switch cir-
cuit 38 to combining circuit 35. The switch circuit and combining
circuit shown in FI~. 10 are substantially similar to the respective
circuits described hereinabove with respect to FIG. 5.
Optionally, sampling circuit 43 and storage circuit 48
are provided with respective clear or reset circuits 49 and 51~ The
purpose of these clear circuits is to remove or "erase" the contents
of the sampling circuit and storage circuit in preparation for a
subsequent sampling and storage operation, respectively. Accordingly,
for the embodiments wherein sampling circuit 43 and storage circuit 48
include capacitors across which sampled signal levels are stored,
clear circuits 49 and 51 each may comprise a discharge.'circuit that
is selectively actuated to discharge, or "clear", the storage capacitor.
Clear circuit 49 is actuated in response to complementary s'ampling
? pulse S3, and clear circuit 51 is actuated in response to a sampling
pulse S4. In theillustrated embodiment, sampling pulse S4 is produced
by a monostable multivibrator 50 which is triggered to its unstable
state in response to the negative transition in sampling pulse S2~
Hence, the trigger input of monostable multivibrator 50 is coupled
to the output of monostable multivibrator 44.
The purpose of non-linear circuit 53 is to se.lectively vary
the step increases of the staircase signal produced by staircase gen-
erator 42 as a function of the deviation between the scanning path
traversed by head la and a record track T. That is, the step increases
in the amplitude of the staircase signal preferab:Ly are of greater
-28-
magnitude when the scanning path deviates greatly from the record
track; but the magnitude o~ the step increases is reduced as the
scan,ning path approaches coincidence with the record ~rack. Since
the staircase signal is supplied through non-linear circuit 53 as
the level control signal for level changing circuit 41, this means
that the ramp signal is subjected to a smaller change in level as
the scanning path approaches coincidence with the recora trac~.
Non-linear circuit 53 may comprise a variable gain amplifier having
a gain-controlling input adapted to receive a control signal for
determining the gain thereof, and thus the magnitude of the step
increase ~n the amplitude of the staircase signal. This gain con-
trolling signal is adapted to be produced by a comparator 46, which
may be similar to comparator 45, having a first input coupled to
sampling circuit 43 and a second input coupled to another sampling
circuit 54. Sampling cixcuit 54 may be similar to sampling circuit
43 and is adapted to sample 'che level of the envelope-detected signal
produced by envelope detector 22 when head la reaches the approximate
mid-point of its scanning path. Accordingly, sampling circuit 54
includes a sampling pulse input terminal adapted to receive sampling
pulse S4 produced by monostable multivibrator 50. Preferably, sampling
circuit 54 is energized in response to a positive transition in sampling
pulse S4. A clear circuit 55, similar to aforedescribed clear circuits
49 and 51, is coupled to clear or reset sampling circuit 54, ana is
responsive to sampling pulse S3 produced by monostable multivibrator
47 in order to perform this operation.
As will be appreciated, comparator 46 functions to compare
the level-detected signal at the beginning of the scanning path tra-
versed by head la with the level-detected signal at the mid-point of
the scanning path. These respective level-detected signals will
have approximately the same envelope levels when the scanning path
-29-
of heac1 la is substantially coincident with a record track In
the absence of such coincidence, that is, when the scanning path
deviates from the record track, the output of comparator 46 con-
trols the yain of non-linear circuit 53. Hence, when coincidence
(or substantial coincidence) is attained, the gain of non-linear
circuit 53 is maintained substantially constant.
The selective level-changed ramp signal produced by ramp
signal generator 37 and level changing circuit 41 is combined in~
combining circuit 35 with the DC bias signal produced by bias gen-
erator 27. In a preferred embodiment, separate selective level-
controlled signals are produced for the respective heads la and lb
However, only a single control circuit for producing the DC bias
signal need be provided for both heads. Consequently, separate
combining circUits 3S and 35' are provided for receiving the
~eparate selective level-controlled signals and for combining same
with the commonly produced DC bias signal. It is, therefore, appre- -
ciated that control circuit 40 (FIG. 10) includes circuitry similar
to the above-described circuitry for producing the selective level-
changed ramp signal for adjusting the scanning path of head lb. In
the interest of brevity, further description of control circuit 40
is not provided, especially since such further description merely
would be redundant of the foregoing.
The operation of the tracking-error correcting system
shown in FIG. 10 now will be described in conjunction with FIGS. 11
and 12. It will be appreciated that the following description relates
to adjusting the scanning path traversed by head la; but that this
description is equally applicable to the adjustment of the scanning
path traversed by head lb. Let it be assumed that head la scans
xecord medium 3 during alternate fieId intervals Ta; and that head lb
scans record medium 3 during alternate field intervals Tb. If it is
-30-
further assumed that the video signal recordin~/reproducing apparatus
has parallel tracks T (FIG. 12) recor~.ed thereon ~nd is operated in
the stop mode, then the function of bias generator ~7, as described
previously with respect to FIG. 5, adjusts th~ head support assembly
such that head la traverses scanning path P3 relative to track T.
(FIG. 12). Consequently, the envelope of the video signal reproduced
by head la will appear as shown in FI~. llA. The envelope of this
reproduced signal, as detected by envelope detector 22, initially is
at a relatively low level in view of the large deviation between
the beginning of scanning path P3 and the beginning of record track T,
this envelope then increasing to the level whereat the scanning path
intersects the record track at the substantial mid-point of the latter,
and then the detected envelope decreases as the scanning path again
deviates from the record track.
Change-over pulses SO are applied to terminal 21, and
the positive transition in the change-over pulse triggers monostable
multivibrator 44 to produce sampling pulse S2 (FIG. l.lC) and comple-
mentary sampling pulse S2 (FIG. llG). The negative transition in
the change-over pulse triggers monostable multivibrator 47 to produce
sampling pulse S3 (FIG. llE) at the start of each field Tb, this
monostable multivibrator also producing complementary sampling pulses
S3 (FIG. llF). At the termination of sampling pulse S2, monostable
multivibrator 50 is triggered to produce sampling pulse S4 ~FIG~ llD).
Preferably, sampling pulse S4 is a negative-going pulse, and the
cumulative duration of pulses S2 and S4 is substantially equa.l to
one-half of field interval Ta. Thus, the positive transition in
sampling pulse S4 substantially coincides with the mid-point of the
scanning path traversed by head la.
-31-
~,
Ramp generator 37 is synchronized with change-over
pulses SO to produce a ramp signal of constant amplitude, similar
to the ramp signal shown in FI(,. 6B. The level of this ramp signal
~is selectively changed by level changing circuit 41, and this le~el-
changed ramp signal is supplied through switch circuit 38 to combin-
ing circuit 35 whereat it is combined with the DC bias signal produced
by bias generat~r 27 and supplied as a drive signal to output termi-
nal 39a. Sampling circuit 43 is responsive to sampling pulse S2 to
sample the envelope shown in FIG. llA at the beginning of the scan-
ning path traversed by head la. This sampled level El is stored insampling circuit 43, and at the time defined by sampling pulse S3,
that is, at the completion of fieId Ta (or at the start of field Tb),
the sampled level El is transferred to storage 48. At the next field
interval Ta, sampling circuit 43 is responsive to sampling pulse S2
to sample the level of the envelope-detected signal represented as
E2. Prior to this sampling time, clear circu;t 49 is energized in
response to complementary sampling pulse S3 so as to clear the. residual
contents of sampling circuit 43. Thus, after the enveIc~e-detected
signal is sampled by sampling circuit 43, the sampled level E2 is
stored in sampling circuit 43 and the sample of the envelope-detected
signal at the beginning of the previous scanning path is stored as
signal El in storage circuit 48. These levels are compared by com-
parator 45, and since E2 is greater than El (E2~ El~, the com~arator
produces a binary "1". This binary "1" is stored in storage circuit
52 at the sample time determined by the positive transition ~n com-
plementary sampling pulse S2. Thus, staircase generator 42 is enabled
in response to this stored binary "1" to continue generating the.
staircase signal whose amplitude is increased by a predetermined
increment at the beginning of each field interval Ta~ that is, when
head la commences its scan of record medium 3. If it is assumed
-3~-
that, non-linear circuit 53 is omitted, this step increase in the
amp]!itude of the staircase signal is used to correspondingly change
the gain (or attenuation factor) of level changing circuit 41. Con-
sequently, a corresponding change in the level of the ramp signal
produced by ramp generator 37 is attained. This level-changed ramp
signal, shown in FIG. llH, is supplied through switch circuit 38
to combining circuit 35. It is recalled, from the previous descrip-
tion of FIG. 5, that swi~ch circuit 38 is closed at a predetermined
subsequent time following the actuation of stop switch 33, as deter-
mined by the time constant of monostable multivi~rator 32.
Accordingly, the change in the level of the ramp signaldeflects the head support assembly by a corresponding amount so as
to adjust the scanning path traversed by head la, as shown ~y path P4
in FIG. 12.
Now, the effect of non-linear circuit 53 will be considered.
Sampling circuit 54 is responsive to the positive transiti~n ln sampling
pulse S4 to sample the envelope-detected signal produced by envelope
detector 22. Thus, sampling circu~t 54 produces a sampled level E3
tFIG. llA) when head la arrives at the approximate mid-point of its
scanning path. Sampled level E3 is compared to sampled level E2 by
comparator 46, and the difference between these sampled levels, as
xepresented in FIG. llA, is used to produce a control slgnal fo~
controlling the gain of non-linear c~rcuit 53. Thus,,depending upon
the magnitude of this control signal, that is, dependlng upon the
difference between the sampled levels E3 and E2, the amplitude of
each step increase in the staircase signal is varied non-l~nearly
so as to correspondingly vary the gain (or attenuation~ of level
changing circuit 41. This means that the level of the ramp si~na,l
produced by ramp generator 37 is not necessarily changed in a uniform
manner at the beginning of each field interval Ta. Rather, the change
-33-
in the level of the ramp signal is determined, in part, by the
control signal produced by comparator 46 which, in turn, is repre-
sentative of the deviation between the scanning path traversed by
head la and record track T. Stated otherwise, since sampled level
E3 corresponds to the level of the envelope-detected signal at the
time that head la intersects record track T at the approximate mid-
point of the record track, and since sa~pled level E2 corresponds
to the envelope-detected signal level at the beginning of the scan-
ning path traversed by head la, comparator 46 will produce an output
signal ~hose magnitude is a function of the deviation between the
scanning path and the record track. When the scanning path coincides
with the record track, the sampled envelope-detected level E2 will be
substantially equal to the sampled level E3, and the control signal
produced by comparator 46 will be reduced to a reference level so as
to minimize the gain of non-linear circuit 53. This, in turn, means
that the step increase in the staircase signal produced by staircase
generator 42 also will be a minimum increase.
When head la traverses scanning path P5 (FIG. 12), the
level of the envelope-detected signal, as sampled by sampling circuit
43, will be greater than the prev;ous sample stored in storage cir-
cuit 48. That is, the level of the si:gnal reproduced by head la
at the beginning of scanning path P5 will be graater than the level
of the signal reproduced by head la at the beginning of scanning
path P4. Consequently, comparator 45 produces a binary "1" which
is used as an enabling signal to continue the operation of staircase
generator 42. Since the gain of non-linear circuit 53 has been
reduced to a minimum at this time (E3 = E2 for scanning path P5),
the step increase in the staircase signal is a minimum increase such
that the level of the ramp signal is changed by a corresponding mini-
mum amount. During the next scan of record medium 3 by head la, the
-34-
heacl traverses scanning path P6 (FIG. 12). The level of the signal
reproduced by head la at the beginning of scanning path P6 is equal
to or less than the level of the signal reproduced by head la at
the beginning of the preceding scanning path P5. Hence, comparator
45 now produces a binary "0" which is supplied as an inhibit signal
to staircase generator 42, thereby inhibiting further step increases
in the staircase signal. Consequently, the level of the ramp signa~
produced by ramp generator 37 no longer is changed~ This means that
head la continues to traverse scanning path P6 which is of sufficient
coincidence with track T so as to avoid the reproduction of noise or
crosstalk by head la.
To summarize, the DC bias signal produced by bias generator
27 (described previously with respect to FIG. 5) generally adjusts the
head support assembly so as to bring the scanning path P3 of head la
into position uch that its mid-point intersects track T, as shown
by path P3 in FIG. 12. Then, the level of the ramp signal is changed
as a function of the deviation between the scanning path and record
track T. In accordance with the example described above, the level
of the ramp signal is increased in successive field intervals during
which head la scans record medium 3, until the scanning path coincides
with the record track. This also is represented in FIG. 12 wherein
scanning path P3 is adjusted to path P4, and then to path ~5 until
path P6 is traversed. At that time, that is, when path P6 is traversed
by head la, the level of the ramp signal is maintained at a constant
amplitude. Thus, in accordance with the tracking-error correcting
system shown in FIG. 10, deviations between the scanning p~th traversed
by head la and record track T are corrected rapidly. Furth~rmore,
since the level of the ramp signal is changed as a- function of this
deviation, and also as a function of the inclination between the
scanning path and record track (i.e., as represented by the difference
-35-
... .. ,, .. ~ , .. ...
between sampled level E3 and sampled level E2)~ changes in ambient
temperature which affect the response of the piezo-ceramic leaf
assembly to the ramp waveform drive signal and changes due to the
aging of the leaf assembly, will not prevent -the accurate correction
S of the aforedescribed tracking errors.
Control circuit 40 operates in substantially the same way
as the circuitry shown in FIG. 10 and described above, except that
control circuit 40 generates a drive signal for the support assembly
upon which head lb is supported. Since head lb scans record medium 3
during field intervals Tb, the sampling pulses whîch are producea by
control circuit 40 are similar to the sampling pulses shown in FIGS.
llC-llG, except that they are shifted so as to occur relative to
field interval Tb. These sampling pulses produced by control circuit
40 are shown by the waveforms of FIGS. llI-llM which correspond to
FIGS. llC-llG, respectively.
While a common circuit has been used to produce the DC
bias signal for both of the head support assemblies, which.DC bias
signal may be produced in response to the envelope-aetected level
of the signal reproduced by e.ither head la or head lb, it is preferred
to use separate ramp-drive generators for the respective head support
assemblies. This takes into account any differences between the
responses and other physical parameters of the head support assemblies.
In the head support assembly shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B,
damping members 13a and 13b were provided in order to damp free or
resonant oscillation of each of the leaf assemblies. In an alterna-
tive construction, electrical damping is achieved. One embodiment of
a construction of the head support assembly wherein eIectrical damping
is utilized is shown in the perspective view of FIG. 13. As shown,
the head support assembly is provided with a pair of leaf assemblies
61 and 71. Head la is supported on only one of these leaf a.ssemblies
-36-
61. Leaf ~ssembly 61 and leaf assembly 71 both are constructed o
as t:o be substantially similar to the assembly shown in, for example,
FIG. 3C. Hence, in leaf assembly 61, piezo-ceramic material 62 has
its opposite surfaces plates with electrodes 64 and 65, respectively,
and overlies another piezo-ceramic material 63 whose opposite surface~
also are plated with electrodes 66 and 67, respectively. Leaf assem-
bly 71 is similarly constructed of piezo-ceramic material 72 whose
opposite surfaces are plated with electrodes 74 and 75, respectively,
and which overlies another piezo-ceramic material 73 whose opposite
surfaces are plated with electrodes 76 and 77, respectively. Leaf
assemblies 61 and 71 are supported in side-by-side relation by a
common mounting base 60. Base 60 is affixed either to th~ diametric
arms or to the rotary drum which is used to rotate heads la and lb
~FIGS. lA and lB). Preferably, leaf assemblies 61 and 71 are secured
to each other such that when assembly 61 is deflected by drive si.gnals
applied thereto by the tracking-error correcting system shown in,
for example, FIG. 10, leaf assembly 71 is correspondingly deflected.
Conducting leads are connected to suitable electrodes~ of leaf assembly
71 such that when this assembly is deflected, electrical signals
indicative of such deflecti~n are produced at these conducting leads.
The electrical signa.ls produced by leaf assembly 71 a~e
used by the.circuit shown as the block diagram in FIG. 14.SQ as to
damp resonant oscillations which may be caused in response to the
ramp signal which is applied as a drive signal to leaf assembly 61.
In the damping circuit shown in FIG. 14, an input terminal ~1 is
adapted to receive the ramp drive signal and an ampl.ifier 86 res~onds
to this drive signal so as to apply suitable voltages to the e.lectrodes
of leaf assembly 61 whereby this leaf assembly is correspondingly
deflected. ~nother input terminal 82 is provided to receive the
electrical signal produced by leaf assembly 71 when this leaf assembly
-37-
is deflected by reason of the deflection of leaf assembly 61. Input
term:inal 82 is coupled through an amplifier 83, a phase shifter 84
and a low pass filter 85 to amplifier 86. In the event that leaf
assembly 71 begins to vibrate (so as to commence resonant oscillation),
a signal indicative of such vibration is amplified and phase-shifted
50 as to be supplied through low pass filter 85 as a negative feedback
signal to amplifier 86. That is, this negative feedback signal tends
to reduce the drive signal applied to amplifier 86 from input terminal
81 so as to damp or prevent the resonant oscillation from continuing~
In a preferred embodiment, phase shifter 84 provides a 18Q (or phase
inversion) phase shift.
One embodiment of low pass filter 85 is shown schematically
in FIG. 15 wherein an input resistor 88 is coupled to ground by ~
capacitor 92, the junction ~etween these elements being coupled by
an inductor and then to ground by another capacitor q3, the junction
between this inductor and capacitor being coupled by another inductor
91 to a parallel circuit formed of resistor 89 and capacitor 94, this
parallel circuit also being connected to ground.
The tracking-error correcting system shown in FIG. 10 has
been described for particular use in correcting tracking errors which
occur during the still reproducing mode~ However, it should be readily
appreciatea that the teachings of this invention can be applied to
the other non-normal reproducing modes. That is, even though the
record medium moves at a relativeIy slower rate during the slow
motion reproducing mode and at a relatively faster rate during the
fast motion reproducing mode, tracking errors which will arise during
these reproducing modes can be corrected by the system shown in FIG. 10.
Essentially, during the slow-motion or fast-motion modesr the DC bias
signal produced by, for example, bias generator 27 for the purpose
of adjusting the scanning path traversed by the head so as to intersect
-38-
the record track at its mid-point is not a constant level. Rather,
this DC signal is changed periodically. For example, in the slow-
motion reproducing mode, the record medium typically is advanced at
one-fourth its normal speed. Consequently, the DC bias signal will
appear as a ramp waveform having a duration equal to four scans of
the head. That is, the duration of the ~C signal ramp waveform will
be equal to the four fields during which the head, such as head la,
scans record medium 3. Thus, the mid-point of each of the four
successive scanning paths traversed by head la during the four suc-
cessive scannings of the same record track T will intersect the
central portion of the record track during each of the four scannings.
This ramp signal can be generated as a function between the difference
in phase between the head-position detecting pulse produced by, for
example, detector 5 (FIG. lB) and a control pulse which normally is
recorded along an edge-wise margin of, for example, video tape.
This DC ramp waveform is applied to com~ining circuit 35 (and com-
bining circuit 35') whereat it is combined with the selective level-
changed ramp signal produced by ramp generator 37 and level changing
circuit 41, shown in FIG. 10.
While the foregoing description of the present invention
has discussed various types of video tape recorders, it is readily
apparent that the record medium may take any other aesira~l~ form,
such as a magnetic sheet, or the like. Nevertheless, the principles
discussed hereinabove are applicable for use with such alternative
types of record media. Furthermore, FIGS. 6A and llH have shown
ramp signals having a positive-going waveform during the scannin~
path traversed by the magnetic head. As an alternative, the ramp
waveform may exhibit negative slope. The particular slope of this
ramp signal should be compatible with the response charact~ristics
of the head support assembly. Also, the waveform of the signal
-39-
during the field interval that the head does not scan the record
medium may be a negative-slope ramp signal, as shown in FIG. 6B
and FIG. llH, or any other suitable waveform, as desired. Hence,
the ramp drive signal may exhibit an overall triangular waveform,
a sawtooth waveform, or the like. To avoid initiating unwanted
resonant oscillation, a triangular waveform may be preferred over
a sawtooth waveform. In addition, the duration of the ramp signal,
although shown in FIG. 6B and FIG. llH as ~eing equal to the time ~or
the head to traverse a scanning path completely, may be shortene~ in
some applications. For example, this duration may correspond to one-
half, one-fourth or some other fraction of the scanning path. Also,
while the foregoing description has assumed that a field of video
signals is recorded in track T, it may be appreciated that, if de-
sired, each track may contain a frame of video signals or a multiple
of fields. In that event, change-over pulses SO will have a corre-
sponding frame or multiple-~ield duration. Still further changes
and modifications in form and details will be readily apparent to
one of ordinary skill in the art. Therefore, it is intended that
the appended claims be interpreted as including the foregoing as
well as other such changes and modifications.
-40-
: .: . . , - : :: .... ~: . : - . ... . .
