Language selection

Search

Patent 1116895 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1116895
(21) Application Number: 1116895
(54) English Title: ORTHODONTIC BRACKET
(54) French Title: APPAREIL ORTHODONTIQUE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A61C 7/00 (2006.01)
  • A61C 7/30 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HANSON, GUSTAF H. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • GUSTAF H. HANSON
(71) Applicants :
  • GUSTAF H. HANSON (Canada)
(74) Agent: HIRONS & ROGERSHIRONS & ROGERS,
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-01-26
(22) Filed Date: 1979-02-22
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
886,274 (United States of America) 1978-03-13

Abstracts

English Abstract


Abstract of the Disclosure
A new orthodontic bracket comprises a bracket body (20)
with a mesial-distal slot (42) for the reception of an arch wire
(46 or 80) and a resilient retainer member (48) for retaining the
arch wire in the slot, the retainer member being movable on the
bracket body in the occlusal-gingival directions between s slot-
closed position (e.g. Fig. 5) and a slot-open position (e.g.
Fig. 4). The part (50) of the retainer member which closes
the slot extends into the slot, so that movement of the retainer
member out of the slot-closed position takes place against its
resilience as the opposed embracing retainer parts are moved
apart. Moreover, any force urging the arch wire out of the slot
and contacting it with the retainer urges-the retainer to the
slot-closed position. In the slot-open position the retainer
member can be "parked" on a mesial-distal extending parking
land (70) on the bracket body. A labial-extending gingival step
surface (60) is provided to determine the slot-closed position
and to shield the adjacent bottom edge of the retainer member.
The lingual end (52) of the retainer member protrudes into a
recess (66) in the base, the shape of the recess enabling the
member to be moved from slot-closed to slot-open position by
inserting a sutiable tool into the recess. A new arch wire (80)
for use with such an orthodontic bracket has a convex curved
labial face (82) and a lingual face (88) that is lingually
inclined in the direction from the gingval face to the occlusal
face to form a wedge shaped profile, the wire receiving slot (42)
having a complementary cross-section. Such a wire provides better
control of torque, while at the same time the bracket is usable
with a round arch wire (46).


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property
or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. An orthodontic bracket comprising a bracket body having
lingual, labial, gingival, occlusal, distal and mesial surface
portions and a mesial-distal extending arch wire slot opening to
the labial surface portion, and a retainer member of resilient
material having opposed labial and lingual portions thereof in
embracing sliding engagement with corresponding labial and lingual
body surface portions, the retainer member being movable on the
body between two positions in which the labial side of the slot
is respectively open and closed, the retainer member labial
portion being so shaped that in the slot-closed position it
extends over the body and has its free end protruding into the
arch wire slot so as to engage an arch wire therein and urge it
towards the lingual and occlusal walls of the slot, the movement
of the retainer member away from the slot-closed position toward
the slot-open position taking place against the resilience of the
retainer member owing to movement apart of the said opposed
portions thereof by the interposed engaged part of the bracket
body as the said free end of the protruding labial portion is
moved out of the arch wire slot.
2. A bracket as claimed in claim 1, wherein the said pro-
truding free end of the labial portion of the retainer member pro-
trudes progressively further along its length toward the free end
into the arch wire slot from the occlusal to the gingival direction
for said engagement with an arch wire in the slot, whereby reaction
16

of the arch wire against the said protruding labial portion urges
the retainer member toward the slot-closed position.
3. A bracket as claimed in claim 1, wherein the labial sur-
face portion of the bracket body includes a mesial-distal extend-
ing parking land disposed occlusally of said arch wire slot and
receiving the retainer member labial portion in the slot-open
position and retaining the said member in that position.
4. A bracket as claimed in claim 2, wherein the labial
surface portion of the bracket body includes a mesial-distal
extending parking land disposed occlusally of said arch wire slot
and receiving the retainer member labial portion in the slot-open
position and retaining the said member in that position.
5. A bracket as claimed in claim 2 or 3, wherein the said
parking land is a gingival surface receiving the free end of the
retainer member labial portion in the slot-open position and
retaining the member in that position.
6. A bracket as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3,
wherein the bracket body part not embraced by the retainer member
has an increased labial-gingival dimension adjacent the slot
to provide a gingival surface extending beyond the slot and
engaged by the free end of the retainer member labial portion in
the slot-closed position, the last mentioned bracket body part
shielding the said retainer member free end against snagging.
17

7. A bracket as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3,
wherein the bracket body part not embraced by the retainer member
has a considerably increased labial gingival dimension to provide
adjacent the slot a labially-extending step with a gingival surface
engaged by the free end of the retainer member labial portion in
the slot-closed position to prevent movement of the retainer
member beyond that position, the said gingival surface being
engagable by an arch wire as it is inserted in the slot to guide
the wire into the slot.
8. A bracket as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3,
wherein the part of the bracket body not embraced by the retainer
member has an access recess opening to the lingual and gingival
surfaces, into which recess an end of the retainer member lingual
portion extends, whereby the retainer member can be moved from
slot-closed position to slot-open position by insertion of a tool
into the access recess and engagement thereof with the end of
the retainer member lingual portion.
9. A bracket as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein
the bracket body part embraced by the retainer member is provided
at the junction of the lingual and occlusal surfaces with a
mesial-distal extending passage adapted to receive a retainer
wire.
18

10. A bracket as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, in
combination with a cementing pad attached thereto covering the
lingual surface and providing a respective lingual surface for
reception of cement to fasten the bracket to a tooth surface.
11. A bracket as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, in
combination with a tooth-embracing band to which the bracket
is fixed.
12. A bracket as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein
the part of the retainer member in engagement with the lingual
body surface has a part thereof displaced out of its general
plane and engagable with a cooperating part of the bracket body
to determine the slot-open position of the retainer member.
13. A bracket as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3,
wherein the said mesial-distal arch wire slot has parallel
occlusal and gingival faces and a lingual face that is inclined
lingually in the gingival to occlusal direction, and in combination
with an arch wire which extends mesially-distally through the arch
wire slot and has a labial face that is engaged by the said
protruding labial portion of the retainer member, the said arch
wire having a convex curved labial face, and having a lingual face
that is lingually-inclined in the direction from the gingival face
to the occlusal face at an inclination corresponding to that of the
slot lingual face and so as to form a wedge-shaped profile at the
junction of its lingual and occlusal faces.
19

14. A bracket as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3,
wherein the said mesial-distal arch wire slot has parallel
occlusal and gingival faces and a lingual face that is
inclined lingually in the gingival to occlusal direction, and in
combination with an arch wire which extends mesially-distally
through the arch wire slot and has a labial face that is engaged
by the said protruding labial portion of the retainer member,
the said arch wire having a convex curved labial face, and
having a lingual face that is lingually-inclined in the direction
from the gingival face to the occlusal face at an inclination
corresponding to that of the slot lingual face and so as to form
a wedge-shaped profile at the junction of its lingual and
occlusal faces, and wherein the wire occlusal face is parallel
to the gingival face and longer than the gingival face with the
junction of the occlusal and labial faces extending further in
the labial direction than the junction of the gingival and labial
faces so as to provide said wedge-shaped profile.

15. An orthodontic arch wire for use in combination with an
orthodontic bracket comprising a bracket body having lingual,
labial, gingival, occlusal, distal and mesial surface portions
and a mesial-distal extending arch wire slot opening to the labial
surface portion, and a retainer member of resilient material having
opposed labial and lingual portions thereof in embracing sliding
engagement with corresponding labial and lingual body surface
portions, the retainer member being movable on the body between
two positions in which the labial side of the slot is respectively
open and closed,
the said mesial-distal arch wire slot having parallel
occlusal and gingival faces and a lingual face that 18 inclined
lingually in the gingival to occlusal direction,
the said arch wire having a convex curved labial face,
and having a lingual face that is lingually-inclined in the
direction from the gingival face to the occlusal face at an
inclination corresponding to that of the slot lingual face and
so as to form a wedge-shaped profile at the junction of its
lingual and occlusal faces.
16. An arch wire as claimed in claim 15, wherein the arch wire
occlusal face is parallel to the gingival face and longer than
the gingival face with the junction of the occlusal and labial
faces extending further in the labial direction than the junction
of the gingival and labial faces so as to provide the said wedge-
shaped profile.
21

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


ORTHODONTIC BRACKET AND ARCH ~IRE
The present invention is concerned with improvements
in or relating to orthodontic brackets that are employed in
procedures for applying corrective moving forces to teeth.
The invention is also concerned with improvements in or relating
to arch wires for use with such a bracket.
It is now almost universal practice in orthodontic
procedures that each tooth to be moved has a bracket fastened
thereto, the brackets being connected together by a thin springy
arch wire that applies the required forces thereto. The bracket
is usually fastened to a tooth band that is mounted around the
tooth but increasingly, with the development of suitable cement
systems, the brackets are cemented directly to the tooth surfaces
by means of a bonding pad.
There is disclosed and claimed in my U.S. Patent Serial
No: 3,772,787, issued 20th November 1973, an orthodontic bracket
comprising a bracket body having base, gingival, labial, occlusal,
distal and mesial surface portions and a mesial-distal extending
arch wire slot opening to the labial surface portion; a retainer
member mounted on a bracket ~ody, the retainer member having two
opposed portions thereof in embracing sliding engagement with
corresponding body surface portions with a portion thereof shaped
to extend over the labial surface portion to close the corres-
ponding side of the arch wire slot for retention of the wire
therein, the retainer member being movable with said embracing
sliding engagement on the body between two positions in which the
-- 1 --
, .
. ...

~16~3~35
slot labial side opening is respectively open and closed; and
means for positively retaining the member in at least the said
slot closed position.
It is an object of the present invention to provide
a new orthodontic bracket that is an improvement over that
disclosed in my earlier patent.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided
a new orthodontic bracket comprising a bracket body having lingual,
labial, gingival, occlusal, distal and mesial surface portions
lQ and a mesial-distal extending arch wire slot opening to the labial
surface portion, and a retainer member of resilient material
having opposed labial and lingual portions thereof in embracing
sliding engagement with corresponding labial and lingual body
; surface portions, the retainer member being movable on the body
between two positions in which the labial side of the slot is
respectively open and closed, the retainer member labial portion
being so shaped that in the slot-closed position it extends over
the body and has its free end protruding into the arch wire slot
so as to engage an arch wire therein and urge it towards the
lingual and occlusal walls of the slot, the movement of the
retainer member away from the slot-closed position toward the
slot-open position taking place against the resilience of the
retainer member owing to movement apart of the said opposed
portions thereof by the interposed engaged part of the bracket
body as the said free end of the protruding labial portion is
moved out of the arch wire slot.

The use o~ the brackets of the invention is found to
result in greatly expedited procedures, owing to the elimination
of the previously-used tie wires that must be individually tied
in the mouth and severed. Changes in arch wire are also greatly
expedited, since they require merely the retainer members to be
snapped to the open position, the wire changed, and then the
retainer members to be returned to the closed position, so that
there is a corresponding marked reduction in patient discomfort.
There is also a considerable reduction in the amount of manual
dexterity required of the orthodontist in the performance of
these procedures, the elimination of the need for chair-side
assistance, as well as the considerable saving of time resulting
in greater productivity. A cosmetic advantage is also obtained
in that it has been found the brackets can be made smaller than
hitherto which, together with the elimination of the somewhat
unsightly and potentially uncomfortable tie wires, results in an
improved appearance of the patient.
Particular preferred embodiments of the invention will
now be described, by way of example, with reference to the
accompanying diagrammatic drawings wherein:-
FIGURE 1 is a side elevation with part broken away ofmy prior bracket construction, as shown and claimed in my U.S.
Patent Serial No: 3,772,787,

~16~3~
Figure 2 i5 an exploded perspective view of a bracket
which is a first embodiment of the present invention,
Figure 3 is an exploded view of the bracket body of
the embodiment of Figure 2, together with an attachment pad
employed in securing the bracket to a tooth by cementing,
Figure 4 is a view similar to Figure 2 showing the
bracket assembled and with the retainer member in the slot-open
position,
Figure 5 is a view similar to Figure 4 showing the
retainer member in the slot-closed positisn and with an ar~h
wire fully retained in the slot,
Figure 6 is a view similar to Figure 5, showing the
effect on the retainer member of an arch wire that cannot be
fully retained in the slot as shown in Figure 5,
Figure 7 shows the use of the bracket with a
rectangular arch wire of the invention in the slot,
Figure 8 shows the manner in which the bracket of
the invention is employed with a tie wire when the arch wire
is entirely outside the slot,
Figure 9 is a vertical cross-section taken on the
line 9-9 of Figure 5, with a cementing attachment pad in
positio~,
Figure 10 is the same cross-section as in Fiqure 9.
but with the retainer member in the slot-open position,
Figure 11 is another vertical cross-section of a further
embodiment intended for use with a rectangular cross-section
arch wire of the invention showing in broken lines modification8
-- 4
... .

lJ~16~
made thereto to adapt i~ for moving a tooth to a predeterminte
inclined angle, and illustrating the manner in which it can be
used in combination with an arch wire of circular cross-section.
Figure 12A shows the combination of a bracket of Figure
11 with a new r~ctangular cross-section arch wire of the
invention employed for applying positive torque to a tooth
about the mesial-distal axis,
Figure 12B is similar to Figure 12A and shows the
combination employed when no mesial-distal torque is required,
and Figure 12C is similar to Figures 12A and 12B and showsthe
combination employed for applying negative torque to the tooth
about the mesial-distal axis.
Similar parts are given the same reference number in
all the figures of the drawings.
Each bracket comprises a body 20 which must be mounted on
the respective tooth, either by attaching it to a tooth-
embracing band 21, as shown with the prior art embodLment of
Figure 1, or by cementing it directly to the tooth. Thus, the
body is provided with oppositely-extending flanges 22 so as to
have a sufficiently large lingual surface 24 (Fig. 3) for
secure fastening of the bracket, for example by welding, to the
tooth embracing band, or to a cementing pad 26, illustrated in
Figures 3, 9 and 10. The cementing pad covers the bracket
lingual surface 24 and in turn provides a lingual surface 28
which is formed in some suitable manner, e.g. of foil mesh, or
by having recesses 30 formed therein, to facilitate adherence
of the cement.

For convenience in description the exterior ~urface
of the bracket body 20 is regarded as comprising a labial
surface portion 32, occlusal and gingival surface portions 34
and 36 respectively connected by the labial portion, and two
spaced mesial-distal surface portions 38, also connected by the
labial portion. A lingual surface portion 40 opposite to the
labial portion also joins the occlusal and gingival portions and
the two mesial-distal portions. It will be understood that the
,
body surface may be so smoothly contoured that adjoining surface
portions merge with one another with no specific demarcation
junction between them.
The body is provided with a mesial~distal-extending
slot 42 of rectangular cross-section opening in the labial
surface portion 32 and receiving an arch wire. In the prior
art drawing Figure 1 and in Figures 7 and 12 a rectangular cross-
section arch wire 44 is illustrated, while the wire 46 shown
in Figures 5, 6 and 8 to 11 is of circular cross-section. It
is of course part of the expertise of the orthodontist to
select a wire of appropriate cross-section and dimension from
the many different ones available, depending upon the forces
. that are required to be applied to the tooth to be moved~
Means for retaining the arch wire in the slot, while
permitting relative movements in the required directions
between the bracket and the arch wire, comprise a retainer
member 48 of thin flat resilient material, usually stainless
steel, shaped to embrace the body 20 and to conform closely
while in the slot-closed position with the labial,occlusal and

~ 68 ~ S
lingual portions thereof. For convenience in description the
retainer member will be regarded as comprising opposed labial
and lingual portions 50 and 52 respectively, each in embracing
sliding engagement with the respective bracket body portion,
and a connecting occlusal portion 54. As with the body, these
different portions of the retainer member merge smoothly into
one another with no specific line of demarcation between them.
The retainer member is movable by sliding and embracing movement
on the body between a slot-open position illustrated in Figures
4 and 10 and a slot-closed position illustrated in Figures 5 to
9 and 11. In the prior art Figure 1 the retainer member i8
shown in broken lines in slot-closed position and in ~olid
lines in slot-open position.
In the embodiments illustrated the retainer member
lingual portion 52 is relatively straight and terminates in a
free end 56, while the occlusal portion is approximately semi-
circular. The labial portion 50 immediately adjacent to the
occlusal portion is concave toward the body in conforming
closely thereto as described, while the remaining portion that
terminates in a free end 58 is relatively straight and pro-
trudes deeply into the slot 42. In the slot-closed position
the free end 58 abuts against a long gingival wall 60 of the
slot 42, this long gingival wall being provided by a labially-
extending portion 62 of the body projecting from the body below
the slot on the gingival side thereof. It will be seen that in
the slot-closed position the straight part of the retainer
member labial portion protrudes progressively deeper into the
-- 7

slot in the occlusal to gingival direction, and the extent of
this protrusion is made such that i~ will abut firmly again3t
an arch wire of circular cross-section of diameter for which
the slot is intended. As the result of this relatively deep
protrusion into the slot, any movement of the retainer member
away from the slot-closed position can only take place aga1nst
the resilience of the retainer member, particularly of the
labial and occlusal parts thereof, owing to the need for the
straight labial portion and the opposed lingual portion to
move apart from one another in sliding over the body part
which they embrace.
Therefore, the resilience of the springy material of
the retainer member provides a force at all times urging the
retainer member to move to the slot-closed position, where the
free edge 58 contacts the slot gingival wall 60. The lingual
portion 52 of the retainer member moves in a slot 64 in the
bracket lingual surface, and a recess 66 connecting with the
slot opens to the bracket lingual and gingival surfaces. The
free retainer member end 56 has a part 68 thereof struck out
of its general plane, so that the part cannot enter the slot 64,
but can move freely in the recess 66 during movement of the
member between its two extreme positions. The maximum move-
ment of the retainer member away from slot-closed position is
therefore determined by engagement of the part 68 and the
bracket body at the junction of the recess and the slot. It
will be seen that the retainer member can readily be moved out
of slot-closed position by the orthodontist inserting a simple
- 8

pusher tool into the recess to engage the part 68 and push it
upwards to the maximum extent. The tool can be for example a
plaque scaler, which is always available in a dental operatory.
In the full slot-open posi.tion illustrated by
Figures4 and 10 the labial retainer member free end 58 sits on
a mesial-distal extending so-called "parkingt' land 70. This
land is a discontinuity in the labial surface portion and i8 -
disposed at such an inclination to the remainder of the surface
that any force component caused by the retainer member
resilience and tending to urge the member to the slot-closed
position is not able to move the end off the parking land, 80
that the member is retained sufficiently securely in the slot-
open position. Usually the land will be located to correspond
with the maximum slot-open position set by the part 68, as
described above. It will usually be sufficient to make the
land 70 parallel to the bracket lingual surface for adequate
retention, but as illustrated, the land surface 70 preferably
is.inclined at between 10 and 20, more preferably at about
15,to the parallel position, while the resultant joining
surface 72 will be inclined to conform as closely as possible
to the shape of retainer member in this position; with the
preferred land surface inclinations described above the
inclination of surface 72 will usually be at about 15 to 25
to the paraliel position and opposite to that of the surface
70. The presence of the land 70 and surface 72 is also found
to reduce mechanical interference that otherwise can occur
between the retainer member and the junction of the body labial
'
g

39~
and occlusal surfaces as the retainer member moves between its
slot-open and -closed positions, the member being readily moved
off the parking land to the slot-closed position.
In use the brackets are fastened to the respective
teeth and one end of the arch wire is locked to the end-most
bracket by any suitable means (not illustrated). All the
retainer members are placed in the slot-open position, the
arch wire is inserted into the slots, if possible, and the
retainer members are then moved to the slot-closed positions.
The retainer members are of adequate strength and rigidity
to retain the wire in the slots but permit free movement of the
bracket along the wire and, with circular cross-sections, will
allow various rotations of the bracket relative to the wire.
Any force tending to urge the arch wire out of the slot force~
it against the inclined surface of the inwardly-protruding
part of the retainer member labial portion, resulting in a
force at all times positively urging the retainer member to
move to the slot-closed posLtion, at least considerably
reducing, if not completely eliminating, the possibility that
under the extremely arduous and unpredictable conditions to
which the apparatus is subjected, any of the retainer members
can spring open and allow the arch wire to escape. It has been
found with a particular embodiment that the force required to
open the slot is about 9-10 times the force required to clo~e it.
Referring now to Figures 5, 7, 9 and 10, it will be
seen that a circular cross-section wire of the size intended to
be used in the slot 42 is engaged by the end of the member
- la -

protruding into the slot, while the slot is sufficiently deep
to accommodate a rectangular cross-section wire, so that either
can be employed with the same bracket. Figure 6 illustrates
the fact that the springy retainer member is able to operate
with a wire that is skewed in the slot and partly protruding
therefrom, and will apply a desired rotation force to the
bracket and the tooth, obviating the need in many instances of
the use of a wide double bracket as illustrated in my prior
patent specification.
10The brackets of the invention are particularly suited
for use with rectangular arch wires, in that such a wire is
retained in the slot against rotation about its own longitudinal
axis, and the wire and springy retainer member are able ts
cooperate in applying torgue to the bracket body and thus to
the tooth, extending the nature and type of corrective force
that the orthodontist is able to apply with a single bracket.
: This extended application is facilitated by use of a wire 44
of cross-section as illustrated by Figure 7, which is pxovided
in its labial face closely adjacent to the junction of the
labial and gingival faces with a v-shaped groove constituted
by a "parking land" gingival groove face 76 (Figure 7) and a
connecting labial groove face 78, the latter face conforming
to the shape of the adjacent part of member 50, and into which
groove the retainer member free end 58 can protrude with its
extreme end face but~ing over its entire surface against the
land 76. The groove in the wire provides an improved positive
connection between the wire and the springy retainer member,

895
and thus between the wire and the bracket body, the incllnatlon
of the face 78 assisting in maintaining the retainer member in
the slot-closed position.
The considerable extension of the body part beyond
the slot to provide the gingival slot surface 60 ensures
that the retainer member end 58 is always shielded against the
possibility of snagging, or being snagged, even when the part
50 has been forced away from the body by an arch wire that is
skewed in the slot, as illustrated by Figure 6. Moreover, this
surface facilitates the insertion of a wire into the slot,
since the wire can be moved in the gingival direction to
engage the surface and then slid along the surface into the
slot. Figure 8 illustrated the procedure if the wire cannot
be inserted in the slot of one bracket. Each bracket is
provided with a mesial-distal extending passage 74 of
rectangular cross-section at the junction of the body lingual
and occlusal surface portions, through which passage a tie
wire 76 can be passed to secure the wire to the bracket. The
passage 74 could be of any suitable cross-section if it is
2Q required only to pass a thin tie wire, ~ut it is found
advantageous to make this passage also of rectangular cross-
section so that a rectangular cross-section wire placed therein
is constrained against rotation relative to the bracket. Such
wires can therefore be employed to provide additional corrective
forces.
- 12

~J 16~;15 9~
Pi~Jures 11, 12~-12C show an embodiment of the invention
intended for use with a generally rectangular cross-section
arch wire ~0 of the invention. In order to increase the torque
available by use of this wire its width is made such that, when
fully inserted in the slot 42, there is present some small
lateral displacement of the retainer member away from the bracket
body, so that the spring force of the retainer member is applied
between the wire and the body.
As illustrated, the preferred cross-section of the
wire is with a convex curved labial face 82 and with an occlusal
face 84 longer than the gingival face 86 and a lingual face
88 inclined lingually toward the occlusal fac~, the junction 90
of the occlusal and labial faces e~tending further in the labial
direction than the junction 92 of the gingival and labial
faces. The inclined lingual face cooperates with the occlusal
face so as to form a tapered wedge-shaped profile terminating
in a tip 94 at the junction of the faces. The lingual surface
of the slot 42 is inclined lingually to conform with the
inclination of the lingual face 88. A clearance is provided
between the wire and the slot in the gingival-occlusal direction,
so that the wire is capable of a small degree of rotation in
the s~ot. The clearance also permits the wire to be more
readily inserted into and withdrawn from the slot. Figure 12A
illustrates the manner in which the engagement of the springy
retainer member with the arch wire will apply a positi~e
rotating torque to the bracket 20 and thus to the tooth to which
it is attached, as illustrated by the arrows, while Figure 12C
- 13

~1~9~ ,
illustrates the manner in which this engagement can apply a
negative torque to the bracket and thus to the tooth~ The
effect in ~oth cases is for the wedge-shaped portion of the arch
wire to be moved into snug engagement with the corresponding-
shaped portion of the slot 42.
Figures 11, 12A-12C also illustrate how the bracket
can ~e modified to be used with the rectangular cross-section
arch wire to cause the required tooth movements. Thus the slot
42 can be inclined from the horizontal neutral position shown in
Figure 12B and in solid lines in Figure 11 to any of a number
of inclined positions, clockwise as shown in Figure 12A and
in chain broken lines in Figure 11, or anti-clockwise as shown
in Figure 12C and in broken lines in Figure 11. With the
clockwise-rotated slot of Figure 12A the arch wire will apply
a positive torque to the bracket until the tooth surface is
~ inclined at a predetermined angle to the vertical, while with the
,~ 'anti-clockwise rotated slot of Figures 12C the wire will apply
a negative torque to the bracket. The orthodontist can be
'~ provided with a selection of brackets ,in which the slots are at
different inclinations at predetermined intervals, extending
- over a range of positive angles through zero (neutral) and over
a range of negative angles, the orthodontist selecting the
bracket with the angle required to achieve the desired tooth
orientation.
It will be noted that as the slot is rotated clockwise
from the neutral position of Figure 12B its width is increased,
while its width is decreased upon anti-clockwise rotation to
the negative torque configuration of Figure 12C, this effect
- 14

being progressive with the change in torque angle. If the
lingual wall of the slot 42 were maintained uninclined as shown
in Figures 2-6 and 8-10, then at some rotation of the slot its
width would become such that a circular cross-section arch
wire 46 would be free to move laterally therein, so that it
would not be positively contacted by the retainer 20 to enable
use to be made of the springyness of the retainer member and its
relative sensitivity to lateral displacement. The wedge-shaped
configuration of the occlusal-labial junction permits this
undesirable effect to be avoided, and it is found possible with
all the required bracket configurations to provide for adequate -
engagement between the wire 46 and the retainer 50, the wire
being urged by the retainer into the wedge-shaped portion of
the slot 42.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1116895 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1999-01-26
Grant by Issuance 1982-01-26

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GUSTAF H. HANSON
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1994-01-27 6 181
Cover Page 1994-01-27 1 8
Abstract 1994-01-27 1 38
Drawings 1994-01-27 2 96
Descriptions 1994-01-27 15 515