Language selection

Search

Patent 1117054 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1117054
(21) Application Number: 1117054
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR PREPARING GASOLINE FROM COAL
(54) French Title: METHODE DE PREPARATION D'UN CARBURANT AUTOMOBILE A PARTIR DE LA HOUILLE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10G 1/06 (2006.01)
  • B01J 29/88 (2006.01)
  • C07C 1/04 (2006.01)
  • C10G 3/00 (2006.01)
  • C10J 3/46 (2006.01)
  • C10L 1/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SCHAPER, LAMBERT
  • SIE, SWAN T.
(73) Owners :
  • SHELL CANADA LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • SHELL CANADA LIMITED (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-01-26
(22) Filed Date: 1978-11-29
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
7713271 (Netherlands (Kingdom of the)) 1977-12-01

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Process for preparing gasoline from coal. Coal is
gasified at a temperature of from 1050°C to 2000°C to a mixture
of CO and H2. The mixture is converted to a hydrocarbon mixture
over a catalyst containing a crystalline iron silicate. From
the hydrocarbon mixture isobutane and an aromatic gasoline fraction
are separated. The isobutane is converted by alkylation into a
product from which a gasoline fraction is separated. The two
gasoline fractions are mixed.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
l. A process for preparing liquid hydrocarbons from coal,
characterized in that
(A) the coal is converted into a mixture of carbon
monoxide and hydrogen by gasification at a temperature between
1050°C and 2000°C;
(B) the mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen is con-
verted into an aromatic hydrocarbon mixture using a catalyst con-
taining a crystalline silicate which
(1) is thermally stable to temperatures above 600°C,
(2) after dehydration at 400°C in vacuum, is capable of adsorbing
more than 3% w water at 25°C and saturated water vapour
pressure, and
(3) in dehydrated form, has the following overall composition,
expressed in moles of the oxides
(1.0 + 0.3) (R)2/n 0.[a Fe2O3. b Al2O3. c Ga2O3].
y(d SiO2 + e GeO2), where
R = one or more mono- or bivalent cations,
a ? 0.1,
b ? 0
c ? 0
a + b + c = 1
y ? 10
d ? 0.1
e ? 0
d + e = 1, and
n = the valency of R

(C) from the aromatic hydrocarbon mixture an isobutane-
containing gaseous fraction and an aromatic liquid fraction boiling
in the gasoline range are separated,
(D) the isobutane-containing gaseous fraction is con-
verted by alkylation into a product from which a fraction boiling
in the gasoline range is separated, and
(E) the two fractions boiling in the gasoline range
obtained according to (C) and (D) are mixed.
2. A process according to claim 1 characterized in that the
catalyst used in step (B) contains a crystalline silicate in which,
in the formula which gives the overall composition, c and e are
equal to 0.
3. A process according to claim 1 characterized in that the
catalyst used in step (B) contains a crystalline silicate of which,
in the formula which gives the overall composition, a is equal to 1.
4. A process according to claim 1 characterized in that the
catalyst used in step (B) contains a crystalline silicate of which,
in the formula which gives the overall composition, y is less than
600.
5. A process according to claim 1 characterized in that the
olefins content of the isobutane-containing fraction is increased
before subjecting it to alkylation.
6. A process according to claim 1 characterized in that to
increase the vapour pressure light hydrocarbons, preferably n-
butane or LPG, obtained as by-products of the process, are added to
21

the gasoline obtained by mixing the fractions boiling in the gaso-
line range and prepared according to steps (C) and (D).
7. A process according to claim 6 wherein the light hydro-
carbons used to increase the vapour pressure are n-butane or LPG.
22

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~7~54
PROCESS FOR PREPARING HYDROCARBONS
The invention relates to a process for preparing liquid
hydrocarbons from coal.
Hydrocarbon mixtures boiling in the gasoline range can be
obtained, for instance, by straight-run distillation of crude
S mineral oil, by conver~;on of heavier mineral oil fractions, for
instance, by catalytic cracking, thermal cracking and hydro-
cracking, and by conversion of lighter mineral oil fractions, for
instance by alkylation.
In view of the increasing need of gasoline and the decreas;ng
reserves of mineral oil there is a great interest in processes
having the potentialities of converting carbon-containing
materials not based on mineral oil, such as coal, in an economically
justified way into hydrocarbon mixtures boiling in the gasoline
range.
It is known that carbon-containing materials, such as coal,
can be converted into mixtures of carbon monoxide and hydrogen by
gasification. It is further known that mixtures of carbon monoxide
and hydrogen can be converted into mixtures of hydrocarbons by
contacting the gas mixtures with suitable catalysts. Finally, it
is known that mixtures of paraffins and olefins boiling below
the gasoline range can be converted into hydrocarbon mixtures
boiling in the gasoline range by contacting the mixtures first
mentioned with an alkylation catalyst.
; The Applicant has carried out an investigation to examine
to what extent the three above-mentioned processes can be used

-2~ 7~
~or p~eparing gasoline Erom coal. This investigation has sh~wn
thae ~asoline having a high octane number can be prepared from
coal ~ combining the three above-mentioned processes, provided
~ha~ e following cond;tions are satisfied.
First of all, an aromatic hydrocarbon mixture shou]d
be ?repared from the mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen
obtained by gasification of coal, using a catalyst containing
a crystalline silicate which
a) is rhermally stable to temperatures above 600 C,
b) after dehydration at 400C in vacuum, is capable of
adsorbing more than 3 %w water at 25C and saturated
water vapour pressure, and
c) in dehydrated form, has the following overall composition,
ex?ressed in moles of the ox;des
(1.0 + 0.3)(R)2/nO./ a Fe203-b A1203.c Ga203_7-
Y(d SiO2 + e GeO2), where
R= one or more mono-or bivalent cations,
a ~, 0.1,
b ~ 0,
c ~ 0,
a + b + c= 1,
Y ~, 10,
d 3 0.1,
e ?, 0,
d + e= 1, and
n= the valency of R.
From the aromatic hydrocarbon mixture thus obtained two
fractions should then be separated, viz. an isobutane-containing
gaseous fraction, which is contacted with an alkylation catalyst
and an aromatic liquid fraction boiling in the gasoline range.
Finally, a fraction boiling in the gasoline range i9 separated
from the product obtained in the alkylation, and this fraction
is mixed with the gasoline fraction that was separated from the
reaction product of carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
The present patent application therefore relates to a
process for preparing liquid hydrocarbons from coal, in which

~1~7~54
a) the coal is converted into a mixture of carbon monoxide and
hydrogen by gasification at a temperature of from 1050C to 2000C;
b) the mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen is converted into an
aromatic hydrocarbon mixture using a catalyst which contains a
crystalline silicate, such as defined hereinbefore;
c) from the aromatic hydrocarbon mixture an isobutane-containing
gaseous fraction and an aromatic liquid fraction boiling in the gas-
oline range are separated;
d) the isobutane-containing gaseous fraction is converted by alkyl-
ation into a product from which a fraction boiling in the gasoline
range is separated, and
e) the two fractions boiling in the gasoline range obtained accord-
ing to c) and d) are mixed.
In the first step of the process according to the invention
a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen is prepared by gasification
of coal. This gasification is carried out at a temperature between
1050 and 2000C. As a result of the use of this high temperature
the synthesis gas prepared contains very little methane, if any at
all. In comparison with a process in which in the first step a lower
temperature is used, for instance between 800 and 1000C, the high-
temperature gasification gives a higher yield of CO and H2 per tonne
of coal and a higher gasoline yield per tonne of coal. Because of
the use of a gasification temperature between 1050 and 2000C the
product contains only very small amounts of non-gaseous by-products
such as tar, phenols and condensable hydrocarbons, if any at all.
The absence of these products also leads to a higher yield of CO and
H2 and therefore to a higher gasoline yield than when a lower temp-
erature is used in the gasifi-

:1117054
cation step. In addition, no provisions have to be made to remove
tar, phenols and condensable hydrocarbons from the synthesis gas,
which will promote the economy of the gasoline preparation.
The starting materials in the process according to the
invention may, for instance, be: lignite, bituminous coal, sub-
bituminous coal, anthracite and coke. With a view to achieving
more rapid and complete gasification, it is preferred first to re-
duce the starting material to powder. The gasification is prefer-
ably carried out in the presence of oxygen and steam. It is prefer-
red to choose such an oxygen/steam ratio that per part by volume ofoxygen from 5 to 150%v steam is present. The oxygen used is pre-
ferably preheated before it is contacted with the coal. This pre-
heating can very conveniently be carried out by heat exchange, for
instance, with the hot product gas prepared according to step a) of
the process. By preheating, the oxygen is preferably brought to a
temperature between 200 and 500C. The reactor in which the gasif-
ication is carried out preferably consists of an empty steel vessel
lined with a heat-resistant material. A suitable reactor is de-
scribed in British Patent 1,501,284 and in Canadian Patent 1,069,305.
The high temperature at which the gasification is effected is pro-
duced by the reaction of the coal with oxygen and steam. The mix-
ture to be reacted is preferably introduced into the reactor at
high speed. A suitable linear speed is 10 to 200 m/s. The pressure
at which the gasification is carried out may vary within wide lim-
its. The absolute pressure is preferably 1 to 200 bar. In order
to convert as much as possible of the coal introduced into the
reactor into gas, the coal particles should remain in the reactor
-- 4

1117~54
for some time. It has been found that a residence time of from 0.1
to 12 seconds is sufficient for this purpose. After the coal has
been converted into gas, the reaction product, which consists sub-
stantially of H2, CO, CO2 and H2O, is removed from the reactor.
This gas, which has as a rule a temperature higher than 1000C, may
contain impurities such as ash, carbon-containing solids and hydro-
gen sulphide. To allow the impurities to be removed from the gas,
the latter should first be cooled. This cooling can very suitably
be effected in a boiler, in which steam is formed with the aid of
the waste heat. Although as a rule the solids content of the crude
gas that leaves the boiler is low, a further reduction of the sol-
ids content may nevertheless be desirable, for instance, if the gas
is to be desulphurized. To this end the gas is preferably conducted
through a scrubber where it is washed with water. An apparatus for
this purpose is described in British patent specification 826,209.
Such a washing produces a gas containing hardly any solids any more
and having a temperature between 20 and 80C. The gas may be puri-
fied still further by removal of H2S and, if desired, part of the
CO2. The removal of H2S and CO2 is preferably carried out with the
aid of the ADIP process or the SULFINOL process, which processes
are described in British patent specifications 1,444,963,
1,131,989, 965,358, 957,260 and 972,140.
The mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen prepared
according to the first step of the process according to the in-
vention, is converted in the second step into an aromatic hydro-
carbon mixture using a catalyst which contains a crystalline sili-
cate of a special class. These æeolites effect a high conversion
-- 5

~7Q54
of aliphatic hydrocarbons into aromatic hydrocarbons in commercially
desirable yields and they are in general very active in conversion
reactions in which aromatic hydrocarbons are involved. In the
process according to the invention preference is given to the use
of silicates in which no gallium and germanium are present, in
other words: silicates of which, in the above-mentioned overall
composition, c and e are 0. Such silicates are the subject of
Netherlands published patent application No. 7613957*. Further, in
the process according to the invention preference is given to the
use of silicates of which, in the above-mentioned overall compo-
sition, a is greater than 0.3, and in particular of which a is
greater than 0.5. Particular preference is given to silicates in
which no aluminium is present, in other words: silicates of which,
in the above-mentioned overall composition, b is o. It should be
noted that in the silicates used in the process according to the
invention, y is preferably less than 600 and in particular less than
300. Finally, in the process according to the invention preference
is given to silicates whose X-ray powder diffraction pattern has,
inter alia, the reflections given in Table A of Netherlands patent
application No. 7613957*.
In step b) of the process according to the invention a
mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen should be converted into
*see also U.K. Patent 1,555,928
- 5a -

1~17054
--6--
an aromatic hydrocarbon mixture. Step b) may in itself be earried
out as a one-step or as a two-step process. In the two-step
process the mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen is contacted
in the first step with a catalyst containing one or more metal
components having catalytic activity for the conversion of a
H2/CO mixture into hydrocarbons and/or oxygen-containing hydro-
earbons. In the seeond step the product thus obtained i9 eonverted
into an aromatic hydrocarbon mixture by contacting it under
aromatization conditions with the crystalline silicate. In
the one-step process the mixture of earbon monoxide
and hydrogen is eontaeted with a bifunetional eatalyst whieh
eontains, in addition to the erystalline silieate, one or more
metal eomponents having eatalytie aetivity for the eonversion
of a H2/CO mixture into hydroearbons and/or oxygen-eontaining
hydroearbons. Step b) of the process according to
the invention is preferably carried out as a one-step process.
According to step a) in the proces3 according to the
invention a H2/CO mixture is prepared, whose H2/CO
molar ratio, depending on starting material and reaction conditions~
may vary within wide limits. Before this mixture is further
eonverted aeeording to step b) its H2/CO molar ratio can be
ehanged by adding hydrogen or earbon monoxide. The hydrogen
eontent of the mixture may also be inereased by subjeeting it
to the known water gas shift reaetion.
- 25 As the feed for step b) of the proeess aeeording to the
invention use is preferably made of a gas mixture whose H2/CO
molar ratio is more than 0.4. If the mixture of earbon monoxide
and hydrogen used in the proeess aeeording to the invention as
the feed for step b) has a H2/CO molar ratio of less than 1.0,
step b) is preferably earried out a~ a one-step process by eon-
taeting the gas with a trifunetional eatalyst whieh eontains one
or more metal eomponents having catalytie activity for the eon-
version of a H2/CO mixture into hydroearbons and/or oxygen-eon-
taining hydroearbons, one or more metal eomponents having eatalytie
aetivity for the water gas shift reaetion and the erystalline
silieate. The ratio in whieh the three eatalytie

11~7054
--7--
functions are presene in the catalyst may vary within wide
limits and is chiefly determined by the activity of each of the
catalytic functions. When use is made of a trifunctional catalyst
in step b) of the process according to the invention for conver-
ting a H2/C0 mixture with a H2/C0 molar ratio of less than 1.0,
the object is that of the acyclic hydrocarbons and/or oxygen-con-
taining hydrocarbons formed under the influence of a first catalytic
function, as much as possible is converted under the influence of
a second catalytic function into an aromatic hydrocarbon mixture
substantially boiling in the gasoline range, and that of the water
liberated in the conversion of the mixture of carbon monoxide and
hydrogen into hydrocarbons and/or in the convers;on of oxygen-con-
ta;ning hydrocarbons into an aromatic hydrocarbon mixture, as much
as possible reacts under the inftuence of a third catalytic function
with the carbon monoxide present in an excess amount in the mixture
of carbon monoxide and hydrogen with formation of a mixture of
hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In the composition of an optimum tri-
functional catalyst to be used in step b) of the process according
to the invention, which catalyst contains a given quantity of a first
catalytic function having a given activity, it is therefore possible
to do with ]ess of the other catalytic functions according as these
are more active.
Although the trifunctional catalysts that can be used in step b)
of the process according to the invention are described in this
patent application as catalysts containing one or more metal components
having catalytic activity for the conversion of a H2/CO mixture into
hydrocarbons and/or oxygen-containing hydrocarbons and one
or more metal components having catalytic activity for
the water gas shift reaction, this means in no way that
separate metal components each having in themselves one of the two
catalytic functions should always separately be present in the
catalysts. For, it has been found that metal components and combinations
of metal components having catalytic act;vity for the conversion of
a H2/CO mixture into substant;ally oxygen-containing hydrocarbons
as a rule also have sufficient catalytic activity for the
water gas shift reaction, so that in such a case incorporation
of one metal component or one combination of metal components

1117Q54
into the catalysts will suffice. Examples of such metal components
are the metals chosen from the group formed by the metals zinc,
copper and chromium. When use is made of trifunctional catalysts
containing these metals in step b) of the process according to
the invention, preference is given to catalysts containing
combinations of at least two of these metals, for instance the
combination zinc-copper, zinc-chromium or zinc-copper-chromium.
Particular preference is given to a trifunctional catalyst
containing in addition to the crystalline silicate the metal
combination ~inc-chromium. Metal components and combinations
of metal components having catalytic activity for the
conversion of a H2/CO mixture into substantially hydrocarbons
have as a rule no or insufficient activity for the water gas
shift reaction. When use is made of such metal components or
combinations of metal components in the catalysts, one or more
separate metal components having catalytic activity for the water
gas shift reaction should therefore be incorporated therein.
The trifunctional catalysts which are used in step b) of
the process according to the invention are preferably composed
of two or three separate catalysts, which will for convenience
be designated catalysts X, Y and Z. Catalyst X is the catalyst
containing the metal components having catalytic ~ctivity for
the conversion of a H2/CO mixture into hydrocarbons and/or oxygen-
containing hydrocarbons. Catalyst Y is the crystalline silicate.
Catalyst Z is the catalyst containing the
metal component having catalytic activity for the water gas
shift reaction. As has been explained hereinbefore the use of a
Z-catalyst may be omitted in some cases.
If as the X-catalyst a catalyst is used which is capable
of converting a H2/CO mixture into substantially oxygen-con-
taining hydrocarbons, preference is given to a catalyst which iscapable of converting the H2/CO mixture into substantially
methanol and/or dimethyl ether. For the conversion of a H2/CO mixture
into substantially methanol, catalysts containing the metal combinations
mentioned hereinbefore are very suitable. If desired, the sa;d metal
combinations may be emplaced on a carrier material. By introducing an
acid function into these catalysts, for instance by emplacing the

lll~Q5~
metal combination on an acid carrier, it may be effected that apart
from the conversion of the H2/CO mixture into methanol a consider-
able part of the mixture will be converted into dimethyl ether.
X-catalysts which are capable of converting a H2/CO mix-
ture into substantially hydrocarbons are referred to in the liter-
ature as Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Such catalysts often contain
one or more metals of the iron group or ruthenium together with one
or more promoters to increase the activity and/or selectivity and
sometimes a carrier material such as kieselguhr. They can be pre-
pared by precipitation, melting and by impregnation. The prepar-
ation of the catalysts containing one or more metals of the iron
group, by impregnation, takes place by impregnating a porous carrier
with one or more aqueous solutions of salts of metals of the iron
group and, optionally, of promoters, followed by drying and calcin-
ing the composition. If in step b) of the process according to the
invention use is made of a catalyst combination in which catalyst
X is a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst, it is preferred to choose for this
purpose an iron or cobalt catalyst, in particular such a catalyst
which has been prepared by impregnation. ~ery suitable Fischer-
Tropsch catalysts for use in the catalyst combinations accordingto the Netherlands published patent application No. 76.12460*. The
catalysts concerned contain per 100 pbw carrier 10-75 pbw of one or
more metals of the iron group, together with one or more promoters
in a quantity of 1-50% of the quantity of metals of the iron group
present on the catalyst, which catalysts have such a specific
average pore diameter (p) of at most 10.000 nm and such a specific
average particle diameter (d) of at most 5 mm, that the quotient p/d
*see also Canadian Patent 1,089,495
_ g _
.

11~7Q54
is more than 2 (p in nm and d in mm).
If in step b) of the process according to the invention
the object is to use a catalyst combination of which X is a Fischer-
Tropsch iron catalyst, it is preferred to choose an iron catalyst
containing a promoter combination consisting of an alkali metal, a
metal that is easy to reduce, such as copper or silver and, option-
ally, a metal that is hard to reduce, such as aluminium or zinc. A
very suitable iron catalyst for the present purpose is a catalyst
prepared by impregnation containing iron, potassium and copper on
silica as the carrier. If in step b) of the process according to
the invention the object is to use a catalyst combination of which
X is a Fischer-Tropsch cobalt catalyst, it is preferred to choose
a cobalt catalyst containing a promoter combination consisting of
an alkaline-earth metal and thorium, uranium or cerium. A very
suitable Fischer-Tropsch cobalt catalyst for the present purpose is
a catalyst prepared by impregnation containing cobalt, magnesium
and thorium on silica as the carrier. Other very suitable Fischer-
Tropsch cobalt catalysts prepared by impregnation are catalysts
containing, in addition to cobalt, one of the elements chromium,
titanium, zirconium and zinc on silica as the carrier. If desired,
it is also possible to use in step b) of the process according to
the invention catalyst combinations containing an X-catalyst, which
is capable of converting a H2/CO mixture into a mixture containing
both hydrocarbons and oxygen-containing hydrocarbons in comparable
quantities. As a rule, such a catalyst has sufficient catalytic
activity for the water gas shift reaction, so that the use of a
Z-catalyst in the combination can be omitted. An example of an X-
catalyst of this type is an iron-chromium oxide catalyst. If de-
-- 10 --

1117~54
sired, it is also possible to use in step b) of the process accord-
ing to the invention catalyst combinations containing -two or more
X-catalysts, for instance in addition to a catalyst of the X-type
which is capable of converting a H2/CO mixture into substantially
hydrocarbons, a second catalyst of the X-type which is capable of
converting a H2/CO mixture into substantially oxygen-containing
hydrocarbons.
Z-catalysts which are capable of converting a H2O/CO
mixture into a H2/CO2 mixture are referred to in the literature
as CO-shift catalysts. Such catalysts often contain one or more
metals of the group formed by iron, chromium, copper, zinc, cobalt,
nickel and molybdenum as the catalytically active component, either
as such, or in the form of their oxides or sulphides. Examples of
suitable CO-shift catalysts are the mixed sulphidic catalysts accord-
ing to the Netherlands published patent applications No. 7305340
and No. 7304793 (see also Canadian Patent 1,018,329 and Indian Pat-
ent 140,246) and the spinel catalysts according to the French pub-
lished patent application No. 7633900*. If in step b) of the process
according to the invention use is made of a catalyst combination in
which a Z-catalyst is present, it is preferred to choose a catalyst
which contains both copper and zinc, in particular a catalyst in
which the Cu/Zn atomatic ratio lies between 0.25 and 4Ø
In the trifunctional catalysts the catalysts X, Y and,
optionally, Z may be present as a mixture, in which, in principle,
each particle of catalyst X is surrounded by a number of particles
of catalyst Y and, optionally, catalyst Z and conversely. If the
*see also U.K. Patent 1,536,652
-- 11 --

1~17054
process is carried out with use of a fixed catalyst bed, this bed
may be built up of alternate layers of particles of catalysts X,
Y al~d, optionally, Z. If the two or three catalysts are used as a
mixture, this mixture may be a macromixture or a micromixture. In
the first case the trifunctional catalyst consists of two or three
kinds of macroparticles of which one kind is completely made up of
catalyst X, the second kind completely of catalyst Y and, optionally,
a third kind completely of catalyst Z. In the second case the tri-
functional catalyst consists of one kind of macroparticles, each
macroparticle being made up of a large number of microparticles
of each of the catalysts X, Y and, optionally, Z. ~rifunctional
catalysts in the form of micromixtures may be prepared, for in-
stance, by thoroughly mixing a fine powder of catalyst X with a fine
powder of catalyst Y and, optionally, with a fine powder of cat-
alyst Z and shaping the mixture to larger particles, for instance,
by extruding or pelletizing. In step b) of the process according
to the invention it is preferred to use trifunctional catalysts in
the form of micromixtures. The trifunctional catalysts may also
have been prepared by incorporating the metal components having
catalytic activity for converting a H2/CO mixture into hydrocarbons
and/or oxygen-containing hydrocarbons and, optionally, the metal
components having catalytic activity for the water gas shift re-
action into the crystalline silicate, for instance by impregnation
or by ion exchange.
The crystalline silicates which are used in step b) of
the process according to the invention are usually
- lla -

1117~54
-12-
prepared from an aqueous mixture as the starting msterial which
contains the following compounds in a given ratio: one or more
compounds of an alkali or alkaline-earth metal, one or more
compounds contain;ng a mono-or bivalent organic cation or from
which such a cation i9 formed during the preparation of the
silicate, one or more silicon compounds, one or more iron compounds,
and, optionally, one or more aluminium, gallium and/or germanium
compounds. The preparation is effected by maintain;ng the mixture
at elevated temperature until the silicate has been formed and
then separating the crystals of the silicate from the mother liquor.
The silicates thus prepared contain alkali and/or alkaline-earth
metal ions and mono- and/or bivalent organic cations. Before
being used in step b) of the process according to the invention
at least part of the mono- and/or bivalent organic cations
introduced during the preparation are preferably converted into
hydrogen ions, for instance by calcining and at least part of the
exchangeable mono- and/or bivalent cations introduced during the
preparation are preferably replaced by other ions, in particular
hydrogen ions, ammonium ions and/or ions of the rare-earth metals.
The crystalline silicates used in step b) of the process
according to the invention preferably have an alkali metal
content of less than 1 %w and in particular of less than 0.05 ~w.
If desired, a binder material such as bentonite or kaolin may be
incorporated into the catalysts that are used in step b) of the
process according to the invention.
Step b) of the process accorddng to the invention is preferably
carried out at a temperature of from 200 to 500C and in particular
of from 300 to 450C, a pressure of from 1 to 150 bar and in par-
ticular of from 5 to 100 bar and a space velocity of from 50 to 5000
and in particular of from 300 to 3000 Nl gas/l catatalyst/hour.
Step b) of the process according to the invention can very
suitably be carried out by passing the feed in upward or in
downward direction through a vertically disposed reactor in which
a fixed or a moving bed of the trifunctional catalyst concerned
is present. Step b) of the process may, for instance, be carried out
in the so-called fixed-bed operation, in bunker-flow operation

~17054
or in ebulated-bed operation. It is preferred to use catalyst
part;cles then with a diameter between I and 5 mm. If desired,
step b) of the process may also be carried out in fluidized-
bed operation or with the use of a suspension of the catalyst ;n a
hydrocarbon oil. It is preferred to use catalyst particles then
with a diameter between 10 and 150 f~m.
In the process according to the invention an isobutane-con-
taining gaseous fraction and an aromatic liquid fraction bo;ling
in the gasoline range should be separated from aromatic hydro-
carbon mixture obtained according to step b). It i9 preferred to
separate the reaction mixture originating from step b) in step c)
into a C2 fraction, a propane fraction, an isobutane-containing
fraction, an n-butane fraction and an aromatic liquid fraction
boiling in the gasoline range. The C2 fraction may be used as fuel
gas. If desired, a H2/CO mixture can be separated from the C2 fraction,
which mixture may be recirculated to step b)~ If the hydrocarbon
content of the C2 fraction is sufficiently high, it may be preferred
to subject it, either after removal of a H2/CO mixture from it or
not, to steam reforming in order to prepare additional synthesis
20 gAS, which may be used as feed component for step b). Steam re-
forming of the C2 fraction can very suitably be effected by con-
tacting it together with steam at elevated temperature and
pressure with a nickel-containing catalyst. Water which may be
formed as a by-product in step b) may, if desired, be used in the
process in the steam gasification of the coal and/or in the steam
reforming of the C2 fraction.
In step d) of the process according to the invention the
isobutane-containing gaseous fraction should be converted by
alkylation into a product from whicb a fract;on boiling in the
3~ gasoline range can be separated. This alkylation can very con-
veniently be effected by contacting the fraction with a strong
acid as the catalyst, such as sulphuric acid or hydrofluoric
acid. Since the gaseous part of the reaction product of step b)
usually contains only small amounts of olefins, the isobutane-con-
taining gaseous fraction which is separated from it will oftenhave too low an olefin content to realize a sufficient conversion

11170S4
-14-
of the isobutane present in it by alkylation. It is therefore
preferred to increase the olefin content of the fraction before
subjecting it to alkylation. An increase in the olefin content
of the isobutane-contain;ng fraction can conveniently be effected
by mixing it with an olefin-rich stream which may originate from
an external source or which has been prepared by dehydrogenation of
the paraffins obtained in the process, such as a propane fraction,
an n-butane fraction or an LPG fraction obtained from it by
mixing. Dehydrogenation of these fractions can conven;ently be
effected by contacting them at elevated temperature with a chromium-
containing catalyst. From the product obtained in the alkylation
a fraction boiling in the gasoline range is separated and this
fraction is mixed according to step e) of the process according
to the invention with the aromatic liquid fraction obtained in
step c) and boiling in the gasoline range. The non-converted
isobutane ;s preferably separated from the product obtained in
the alkylation and recirculated to the alkylation reactor. In
order to increase the vapour pressure of the gasoline mixture
thus obtained, light hydrocarbons are preferably added to it.
As light hydrocarbons use can very conveniently be made of
n-butane or LPG, which may be obtained as by-products of the
process.
Two process schemes for the conversion of coal into aromatic
gasoline according to the invention will be explained in more detail
hereinafter with the aid of the figures.
Process scheme I (see Fig. 1)
The process is carried out in an apparatus comprising successively
a gasification section (1), a gas purification section (2), a hydro-
carbon synthesis section (3), the first separation section (4), a
steam reforming section (5), an alkylation section (6) and the
second separation section (7). A mixture of coal (8), oxygen (9
and steam (10) is gasified and the crude gas (11) is purified.
The purified gas (12) is mixed with a synthesis gas (13) reverted
to furtheron and prepared by steam reforming, and the mixture is
converted under the influence of a trifunctional catalyst according
to the invention into an aromatic hydrocarbon mixture (14). This

11~7054
hydrocarbon mixeure is separated into a C2 fraction (15), a propane
fraction (16), an isobutane fraction (17), a n-butane fraction (18)
and an aro~atic gasoline fraction (19). The C2 fraction (15) is
converted by steam reforming into the synthesis gaY (13). The
propane fraction (16) and the n-butane fraction (18) are mixed into
the LPG fraction (20), which is subsequently separated into two
portions (21) and (22) having the same composition. The isobutane
fraction (17) is alkylated together with an olefin stream (23)
originating from an external source and with an isobutane recir-
culation stream (24) reverted to later. From the alkylationproduct (25) the isobutane recirculation stream (24) and a
gasoline fraction (26) are separated. The gasoline fraction (26)
is mixed with the gasoline fraction (19) and with portion (22)
of the LPG fraction (20) into gasoline (27).
Process Scheme II (see Fig. 2)
The process ;s carried out in an apparatus comprising succes-
sively a gasification section (1), a gas purification section (2)9
a hydrocarbon synthesis section (3), the first separation section
(4), a dehydrogenation section (5), an alkylation section (6) and
the second separation section (7). A mixture of coal (8), oxygen
(9) and steam (10) is gasified, the crude gas (11) is purified and
the purified gas (12) i3 converted under the influence of a tri-
functional catalyst according to the invention into an aromatic
hydrocarbon mixture (13). This hydrocarbon mixture is separated
into a C2 fraction (14), a propane fraction (15), an isobutane
fraction (16) a n-butane fraction (17) and an aromatic gasoline
fraction (18). The propane fraction (15) is converted by
dehydrogenation into a mixture of propene and propane (19).
The n-butane fraction (17) is separated into two portions (20)
and (21). The isobutane fraction (16) is alkylated together with
the propane/propene stream (19) and with an isobutane recirculation
stream (22) reverted to later. From the alkylated product (23)a
propane fraction (24), the isobutane recirculation stream (22)
and a gasoline fraction (25) are separated. The propane fraction (24)
is mixed with portion (21) of the n-butane fraction (17) into the
~ 35 LPG fraction (26). The gasoline fraction (25) is mixed with the

1117C~54
gasoline fraction (18) and with portion (20) of n-butane fraction
(17) into the gasoline (27).
The present patent application also comprises an apparatus
for carrying out the process according to the invention as shown
schematically in Figure 2.
The invention will now be further explained with the aid
of the following examples.
Example I
A crystalline iron silicate (silicate A) was prepared as
follows. A mixture of Fe(NO3)3, SiO2, NaNO3 and [(C3H7)4N]OH in
water with the molar composition Na2O. 1.5 [(C3H7)4N~2O. 0.125
Fe2O3. 25 SiO2. 468 H2O was heated for 48 hours in an autoclave
at 150C under autogenous pressure. After the reaction mixture had
cooled down, the silicate formed was filtered off, washed with water
until the pH of the wash water was about 8 and dried for two hours
at 120C. Silicate A thus prepared had the following chemical
composition 0-8 [(C3H7)4N]2 0 3 Na2O 2 3 2
The silicate had an X-ray powder diffraction pattern
substantially as given in Table B of Netherlands published patent
application No. 7613957*. The silicate was thermally stable to
temperatures higher than 900C and was capable, after dehydration
at 400C, of adsorbing in vacuum 7% w water at 25C and saturated
water vapour pressure. With silicate A as the starting material
silicate B was prepared by, successively, calcining silicate A at
500C, boiling with 1.0 molar NH4NO3 solution, washing with water,
boiling again with 1.0 molar NH4NO3 solution and washing, drying
for two hours at 120C and calcining for four hours at 500C.
*see also U.K. Patent 1,555,928
- 16 -

1~17(~
le I I
A catalyst C was prepared by thoroughly mixing equal
parts by weight of the following finely powdered materials
a) a Fe/Cu/K/SiO2 Fischer-Tropsch catalyst prepared by impreg-
nation;
b) silicate B;
- 16a -
ff. ~
..?_ -'

1~70~4
-17-
c) a Cu/~n CO shi~t catalyst.
Catalyst C was extruded to particles having a diameter of
0.15-0.3 mm.
Example III
A catalyst D was prepared by mix;ng a ZnO-Cr203 composition with
siLicate B in a weight ratio of 3:1. Both materials were present in
the catalyst in the form of particles having a diameter of 0.15-0.3 mm.
The ZnO-Cr203 composition used catalyses both the reduction of CO
to methanol and the water gas shift reaction.
Example IV
Bituminous coal was ground to a particle size of less than
120 microns and used as the feed for a high-temperature coal
gasifier. Per gramme of coal 0.9 g oxygen and 0.15 g steam were
added. The coal gasification was effected at a temperature of
1500C, a pressure of 30 bar and a residence time of 0.5 5.
The coal conversion was 99%. The gas obtained had the following
composition
%v
CH4 0.1
CO 64.7
H2 31.8
C02 1.7
The gas further contained about 1.7 %v H20, COS and H2S.
To remove the last-mentioned impurities from the gas, this gas
was passed at about 45C through a mixture of diisopropyl amine,
sulfolane and water. The resulting synthesis gas, of which the
CO¦H2 molar ratio was 2.03, was further purified by passing it
at 200 C over ZnO. The synthesis gas thus purified was used in
Examples V and VI which were carried out according to process
schemes I and II, respectively.
Example V
The synthesis gas prepared according to Example IV was mixed
in a volume ratio of 65:35 with a synthesis gas (II), reverted to
furtheron, obtained by steam reforming, and the mixture was con-
tacted with catalyst C at a temperature of 280C, a pressure of
30 bar and a space velocity of 1000 1.1 .h . The synthesis gas

~117~54
-18-
conversion was 85%. The hydrocarbon mixture obtained had the
~ollowing composition
%w
Cl 10
C2 15
C3 10
n-C4 3
i-C4 4
C5 gasoline 58
The olefin content of both the C3 and the C4 fractions was
less than 1 %w. The reaction product was separated by cooling
into a C2 fract;on tincluding carbon dioxide and unconverted syn-
thesis gas) and a C3 fraction. The C2 fraction was mixed with
25 ~v steam and the mixture was converted into synthesis gas by
contacting it at a temperature of 900C and a pressure of 30 bar
with a Ni-containing catalys~. The product was washed with caustic
solution to remove C02 and the purified synthesis gas (II) was
mixed with the feed gas. The C3 fraction was separated into
a propane fraction, an isobutane fraction, a n-butane fraction
and a C5 gasoline fraction. The propane fraction and the n-butane
fraction were mixed into LPG. The isobutane fraction was mixed
with 80 %v of a C3-C5 olefin mixture originating from an external
source and the mixture was converted by contacting it at 40C with
a HF alkylation catalyst. By recirculation of isobutane a constant
isobutane/olefin ratio of 14 was maintained in the alkylation
reactor. The alkylate which was obtained in 95% yield was mixed with
the gasoline obtained earlier in the process. To bring the vapour
pressure of the mixture to the proper value part of the ~PG was
added to it. The gasoline thus obtained had an octane number
(CRON) of 89.
Example VI
The synthesis gas prepared according to Example IV was
contacted at a temperature of 375C, a pressure of 60 bar and
a space velocity of 275 1.1 .h with catalyst D. The synthesis
gas conversion was 94~. The hydrocarbon mixture obtained had the
following composition:

1117Q54
-19-
~w
Cl 3
C2 6
C3 15
n-C4 5
i-C4 7
C5 gasoline 64
The olefin content of both the C3 and the C4 fractions was
'ess ehan 1 %w. The reaction product was separated by cooling into
a C2 fraction (including carbon dioxide and unconverted synthesis
gas) and a C3 fraction. The C3 fraction was separated into a propane
f-action, an isobutane fraction, a n-butane fract;on and a C5 gasoline
f action mainly consisting of aromatics. The propane fract;on was
converted by dehydrogenation at 600C over a Cr203 catalyst into a
mixture of propane and propene. The conversion from propane into
propene was 32%. The propane/propene mixture thus obtained was mixed
with the isobutane fraction and the mixture was converted by contacting
it at 40C with a HF alkylation catalyst. From the product obtained
in the alkylation a propane fraction, an isobutane fract;on and a
gasoline fraction were separated. By recirculation of isobutane a
constant isobutane/olefin ratio of 14 was maintained. The alkylation
gasoline yield was 95%. The alkylation gasoline was mixed with
the gasoline obtained earlier in the process. To bring the. vapour
pressure of the mixture to the proper value, part of the n-butane
fraction was added. The gasoline thus obtained had an octane
number (CRON) of ~4. The remaining part of the n-butane fraction
obtained from the C3 fraction of the hydrocarbon synthesis
product were mixed with the propane fraction obtained from the
alkylation product, into LPG.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1117054 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2024-01-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1999-01-26
Grant by Issuance 1982-01-26

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SHELL CANADA LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
LAMBERT SCHAPER
SWAN T. SIE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1994-01-27 3 58
Abstract 1994-01-27 1 12
Drawings 1994-01-27 2 22
Cover Page 1994-01-27 1 10
Descriptions 1994-01-27 22 762