Language selection

Search

Patent 1120788 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1120788
(21) Application Number: 1120788
(54) English Title: UNDERWATER CRAFT FOR ACOUSTIC INSPECTION OF PIPELINES FOR LEAKS
(54) French Title: VEHICULE SOUS-MARIN POUR LE CONTROLE ACOUSTIQUE DES PIPELINES AUX FINS DE LA DETECTION DE FUITES
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B63G 08/39 (2006.01)
  • B63C 11/40 (2006.01)
  • G01M 03/24 (2006.01)
  • G01S 03/801 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HOVING, JELTE
  • SLUYTER, EDWARD A.
  • VAN DER OUDERAA, ROBERT H. J.
(73) Owners :
  • SHELL CANADA LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • SHELL CANADA LIMITED (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-03-30
(22) Filed Date: 1978-02-06
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
7702753 (Netherlands (Kingdom of the)) 1977-03-15

Abstracts

English Abstract


K 5396
A B S T R A C T
An underwater craft equipped for inspecting pipelines for
leaks by acoustic means, characterized in that the craft is equipped
with at least two directional hydrophones which are acoustically
accessible from outside and which are aimed at the pipeline from
various positions.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. An underwater craft equipped for inspecting a pipeline for leaks
by acoustic means while the craft is moving along the pipeline, which craft
is equipped with two or more directional hydrophones, said hydrophones being
sound-receiving only and being acoustically accessible from outside the
craft, said hydrophones being adapted to receive acoustical vibrations
emanating directly from a leak and being adapted in use to be aimed at the
pipeline from various positions on the craft.
2. The underwater craft as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least 2 of
said sound-receiving hydrophones are aligned parallel to the longitudinal
axis of the craft and at its underside.
3. The underwater craft as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one
pair of hydrophones is present, the two hydrophones of a pair being arranged
opposite each other in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the
craft, projecting outside the craft to the left and to the right, respective-
ly, and adapted to be aimed at the pipeline.
4. The underwater craft as claimed in claim 3, wherein the distance
between two hydrophones of a pair is 3-5 times the diameter of the pipeline.
5. The underwater craft as claimed in claim 3, wherein at least 2
pairs of hydrophones are present, arranged in two rows on either side of the
craft spaced along the length, each row being parallel to the longitudinal
axis of the craft.
6. The underwater craft as claimed in claim 4, wherein at least 2
pairs of hydrophones are present, arranged in two rows on either side of the
craft spaced along the length, each row being parallel to the longitudinal
axis of the craft.
7. The underwater craft as claimed in claim 3, wherein the craft is
equipped with two fins slanting downwards and carrying the hydrophones that
form pairs.

8. The underwater craft as claimed in claim 4, wherein the craft is
equipped with two fins slanting downwards and carrying the hydrophones that
form pairs.
9. The underwater craft as claimed in claim 5, wherein the craft is
equipped with two fins slanting downwards and carrying the hydrophones that
form pairs.
10. The underwater craft as claimed in any one of the claims 1-3,
wherein all hydrophones are adapted to be directed at the same point or at
the same cross-section of the pipeline.
11. The underwater craft as claimed in any one of the claims 1-3,
wherein the directions of the hydrophones arranged in a row are parallel to
each other.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The invention relates to an underwater craft equipped for inspect-
ing pipelines for leaks by acoustic means.
A leak in a pipeline for gases or liquids, in particular a small
leak, causes a hissing sound. This sound comprises both audible and ultra-
sonic vibrations and it has long been known that acoustic means may be used
in detecting and locating such leaks. In particular for pipelines for
liquids - oil or oil products - use is made of listening and recording
apparatus accommodated in a pig which is carried along by the stream of
matter through the pipeline. However, this method cannot always be used.
In pipelines for the transport of gas it is far more difficult to detect the
sound of a leak inside the pipeline than in a pipeline for liquids. Again,
in the case of pipelines which are connected to producing fields offshore it
is by no means easy to provide facilities for introducing and removing a pig.
Acoustic vibrations, both audible and ultrasonic, are very well
propagated in water and thus the idea of using a craft as the basis for
detection readily suggests itself. This craft may be a surface vessel, a
submarine, or, alter~atively, a manned or unmanned underwater craft towed
by a ship. The certainty of detecting a leak, however, constitutes a problem
and the invention indicates how this can be improved.
The invention therefore provides an underwater craft equipped for
inspecting a pipeline for leaks by acoustic means while the craft is moving
along the pipeline, which craft is equipped with two or more directional
hydrophones, said hydrophones being sound-receiving only and being acoustical-
ly accessible from outside the craft, said hydrophones being adapted to re-
ceive acoustical vibrations emanating directly from a leak and being adapted ;
in use to be aimed at the pipeline from various positions on the craft.

3'7
-- 3
The acoustic equipment may be tuned into a frequency or
frequency range that has been cho~en as being de~initely signi-
ficant for a leak. In addition, acoustic generators which imitate
the sound of a leak may have been installed at various places.
Hereinafter the term source will consi~stently be used to indicate
both leaks and generators.
The underwater craft may be a submarine or a towed underwater
cr~ft, called a fish. The craft follows the pipeline, either
through guidance by a helmsman or automatically, for instance by
means of steering gear magnetically coupled to the steel of the
pipeline.
The hydrophones may be fitted outside the hull of the craft or
inside, but ~till acoustically accessible, for;in~tance via an
opening or via a suitable membrane. Directional sensitivity can
be obtained by placing a hood around the vibration pick-up, which
hood is coated both inside and outside with sound-reflecting material.
This will reduce the influence of interfering sounds and amplify
the reception of source sounds.
The use of at least two hydrophones promotes reliability in
operation. By installing them at various places on the craft, certain
- ~I L6~r~ R~N560
advantages may be achieved. If ~G~hydrophones are ~c~beii-~ in one row
parallel to the longitudinal axis of the craft at its underside, the
signal from a source is detected by all these hydrophones. In addition
to the increased reliability in operation mentioned hereinbefore
25 other advantages may be achieved. All hydrophones may be aimed ~;
roughly at the same point of the pipeline. This increases the
sensitivity of detection by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio,

~ Y'~ ~ 4
. _ _
so that sounds are detected with more certainty. Moreover, the
detectability limit islshifted to include weaker source~. If in
the processing of the signals a correlation technique is applied
the signal from a source is detected as a sharp and high peak,
which increases the advantages mentioned ev~n further.
Another possibility is that the directions of the hydro-
phones arranged in a row are parallel to each other. In thi~ case
a larger area of the pipeline is covered. A source will he observed
for a longer period of time. An advantage is that sounds origin-
ating from an impact or a tap can be recognized as such and areconsequently not erroneously recorded as originating from a
source.
Another possibility is that at least one pair of hydrophones
is presentJ the two hydrophones of a pair being installed opposite
each other in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of
the craft, projecting outside the craft to the left and to the
right, respectively, and aimed at the pipeline. The hydrophones
forming a pair may be positioned on booms. A considerable advantage
of this configuration is that a much larger area o~ the circum-
ference of the pipeline can be monitored directly, the "dark side"is considerably decreased. The distance between the hydrophones
may be 3-5 times the diameter of the pipeline. There may be for
instance 2-5 pairs of hydrophones arranged in two rows on either
side of the craft spaced along the length, each row being parallel
to the longitudinal axis of the craft. These hydrophones may again
0 6 i~ D .~ ~ t 6 ~ 7' î~
be aimed at the pipeline and parallel to each other or roughly
aimed at the same cross-section of the pipeline. The respective
,,

'7~
- 5 --
advantages of the two ways Or positioning are analogous to those
described hereinbefore.
An attractive combination of the various possibilities
I~R~S'I;I~G ~
- mentioned is installati~ of three rows of hydrophones parallel
to the longitudinal axis of the craft, one row centrally at the
underside of the craft, one row projecting to the left and one
row to the right. In this way advantages already described separately
hereinbefore are combined.
The craft may be equipped with two fins slanting downwards9
and carrying the hydrophones that form pairs. This has great con-
structional advantages. Any degree of projection of the hydrophones
can be realized in a robust design and the stability of the craft
is increased.
The equipment for processing the signals received may be composed
of combinations, known in themselves, of selective amplifiers,
detectors, integrators, comparators and indicating/recording
apparatus. Correlators for two or more channels may be present
as well.
The invention will now be further explained with reference
to some ~igures.
Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4 show some variants of an underwater
craft equipped with hydrophones. Figs. 5 and 6 show a hood con-
struction for hydrophones.
In Fig. 1 numeral 1 shows an underwater craft, in this case a
manned submarine. The craft may be 6 m long and 1.5 m wide. In
this example the submarine is at about 3 metres' distance from a
pipeline 2 having a diameter of 0.75 m. Affixed to the bottom of

the submarine are two directional hydrophones 3 and 4, one near
the stem and one near the stern of the submarine. Both hydrophones
are directed perpendicularly downwards and the submarine will
manoeuvre in such a way that the two hydrophones are adapted to be
aimed at pipeline 2. Broken lines 5 indicate the main direction of
sensitivity.
Figure 2 shows a submarine 10 over a pipeline 11, the sub-
marine being equipped with three hydrophones 12, 13 and 14 installed
in one row. These hydrophones are adapted to be aimed at one point
of the pipeline as indicated by broken line 15.
Figure 3 shows a submarine 20 in cross-section over a pipe-
line 21. Hydrophones 24 and 25 are attached to booms 22 and 23 pro-
jecting laterally. This pair of hydrophones is adapted to be aimed
at one and the same cross-section of pipeline 21, as indicated by
broken lines 26 and 27. A large area of the circumference of the
pipeline is thus brought within the more optimum directional sensi-
tivity of the hydrophones.
Figure 4 shows a bottom view of submarine 30. This sub- ;
marine is equipped with fins 31 and 32. Near the edges of these fins
hydrophones 33 and 3~ are located, each time four in a row parallel
to the longitudinal axis of the submarine. A third row of hydro-
phones 35 is affixed to the bottom of the submarine along the `~
centre line. Each pair of hydrophones 33 and 34, one opposite the
other li.e. in this case four pairs)~ is adapted to be aimed at one
and the same cross-section of the pipeline under inves~igation. So, ;~
in this case four pairs aimed at four different cross-sections.
~Iydrophones 35 are also aimed at that pipeline vertically downwards.
Figure 5 shows a cross-section of a hood for a hydrophone.
The hood
- ,~, . . ~:

consists of a basis 40 of strong material, for instance a metal or
a strong construction of reinforced polymeric material. The outside
is covered with a layer 41 of sound-reflecting material and the
inside with a layer 42 of the same material. Such a layer may con-
sist of a thin metal film applied to a layer of ~ound-insulating
material. Vibration-sensitive element 43 is located in a central
position. This may consist of a number of piezoelectric crystals.
If the apex angle of the hood is 90 all the sound waves entering
in the direction of the centre line will impinge on the crystals
in the same phase and thus be converted into a strong electric
signal. The directional sensitivity is then at its maximum in a
beam coinciding with the centre line of the hood, and having a
base equal to the bottom view of the hood.
Fig. 6 shows such a bottom view. The hood is provided with
one or more vents 44.
.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1120788 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1999-03-30
Grant by Issuance 1982-03-30

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SHELL CANADA LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
EDWARD A. SLUYTER
JELTE HOVING
ROBERT H. J. VAN DER OUDERAA
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1994-02-02 1 9
Claims 1994-02-02 2 53
Drawings 1994-02-02 2 27
Descriptions 1994-02-02 6 202