Language selection

Search

Patent 1120982 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1120982
(21) Application Number: 1120982
(54) English Title: WATER LUBRICATED SLEEVE BEARING
(54) French Title: MANCHON ANTIFRICTION LUBRIFIE A L'EAU
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract


Abstract
A sleeve bearing is described which is useful
for carrying the rotating propellor shaft of water craft,
as well as for various industrial purposes. The sleeve
bearing consists of a single homogeneous solid, hard
elastomeric urethane polymer having a Shore D hardness of
at least 60, a compressive modulus of elasticity at a
4% compressive strain of at least 50,000 psi and a dry
dynamic co-efficient of friction against steel of no more
than 0.20. This polymer is machined so as to fit within
a cylindrical housing by means of a forced interference
fit providing sufficient outward radial force by the outer
surface of the sleeve on the housing to retain the bearing
in movement-free fit during the operational life of the
bearing.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive
property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A sleeve bearing mounted in a cylindrical housing
bore, said bearing consisting entirely of a single homo-
geneous solid, hard elastomeric urethane polymer having a
Shore D hardness of at least 60, a compressive modulus of
elasticity at a 4% compressive strain of at least 50,000
psi and a dry dynamic co-efficient of friction against
steel of no more than 0.20, and said bearing being in the
form of a cylindrical sleeve member precisely machined to
a shape corresponding to the cylindrical housing bore
and forced into the cylindrical housing bore by means of
a forced interference fit providing sufficient outward
radial force by the outer machined surface of the sleeve
on the housing to retain the bearing in movement-free fit
during the operational life of the bearing.
2. A sleeve bearing according to claim 1 wherein the
urethane polymer has substantially homogeneously dis-
tributed therethrough a polyethylene wax in an amount up
to 10% by weight.
3. A sleeve bearing according to claim 1 having a Shore
hardness of from 65D to 80D.
4. A sleeve bearing according to claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein
the urethane polymer is the reaction product of a polyether
or a polyester with a polyisocyanate.
5. A sleeve bearing according to claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein
the sleeve is a single unitary cylindrical sleeve.
6. A sleeve bearing according to claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein
the sleeve comprises a plurality of arcuate segments
together forming the sleeve member.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


This invention relates to bearings and, more
~ particularly, to water lubricated sleeve bearings for use
in carrying the rotating propellor shaft of water craft,
as well as for use as water lubricated "steady" bearings
in various industrial applications such as agitator
bearings or vertical pump bearings.
Rubber, in the general sense, possesses excellent
wear resistance when operated against metals under fully
hydrodynamic conditions and consequently resilient rubber
has been employed very successfully for such purposes.
Such rubber bearings are generally made from an oil- `
resistant chloroprene or nitrile polymer with a Shore A
hardness of between 70 and 80. Rubber is bonded to a
carrying shell of bronze, brass or stainless steel and
the latter is secured by mechanical means to the housing
to which it is fitted. In a modifled design the metallic
outer slee~e has been replaced by a non-metallic
phenolic casing as described in U.S. Patent 3,455,613
issued July 15, 1969. This modification was carried out
principally to eliminate electrolysis and facilitate
removal when required. These two disadvantages of metal-
sleeved bearings have also been overcome by provlding the
bearing with an additional sleeve of rubber molded to the
outer surface of the metal element as described in U.S.
Patent 2,839,3~0, issued June 17t 1958.
Rubber bearings must, of necessity, be rather
long in relation to their diameter because the relatively
low modulus of elasticity of rubber used will not permit
unit pressure loadings much in excess of 35 psi (6Kg/cm2).
In most synthetic rubber compounds, in particular those
commonly used in marine bearings, the level of hardness

~
and consequently -the compressive modulus is a fun~tion of
the degree of carbon black or other filler loading in
the rubber. The higher the filler loading, the harder the
rubber and consequently, the higher the modulus. ~ut this
increase also carries an inverse relationship to the
strength of the rubber in terms of tensile strength at
break, ultimate elongation and wear resistance. ~he
designer thus finds himself at cross purposes in the
endeavour to compoùnd an elastomer possessing good load
support and high physical properties.
Problems with conventional rubber bearings also
develop under certain operating conditions where full
hydrodynamic lubrication does not occur. ~he result is
a substantial squeal or howl, which prevents the use of
these bearings in military craft where quiet operation
is a necessity.
Because of the relatively high dry dynamic co-
efficient of friction of conventional rubber against metal,
users are warned not to operate vessels with ~he bearings
in a dry condition. In the inboard stern tube position a
positive flow of water to conventional rubber bearings
is essential to ensure a hydrodynamic film and prevent
high bearing friction, temperature and rapid wear.
It is the principle object of this invention to
provide a bearing capable of overcoming the shortcomings
of conventional composite rubber/metal or rubber/reinforced
plastic bearings.
According to this invention there is provided
a sleeve bearing for mounting in a cylindrical housing
bore in the form of a single homogeneous machinable solid,
hard elastomeric urethane polymer having a Shore D hardness

of at least 60, a compressive modulus of elasticity at a
4% compressive strain of at least 50,000 psi and a dry
dynamic coefficient of friction against steel of no more
than 0.20. This material is machined to very close
tolerances so that it is fitted within the cylindrical
housing bore by means of a forced interference fit
providing sufficient outward radial force by the outer
surface of the sleeve on the housing to retain the bearing
in movement-free fit during the opera-tional life of the
bearing without the necessity of any extra mechanical
fastening devices.
As examples of the urethane polymer that can
be used in this invention there can be mentioned ma-terial~
available from Thomson-Gordon Limited under the trademarks
"Thordon XL" and "Thordon SXL". Of course, the invention
is not restricted to that particular polymer and any solid,
hard elastomeric urekhane polymer meeting the above
requirements can be used. This ma-terial has a very high
compressive modulus of elasticity as compared with rubber
which has a modulus of only in the order of 1,000 psi.
It also has a very low dry dynamic coefficient of friction
against steel as compared with conventional rubbers
which have a typical coefficient of about 0.~ to 0.6.
One of the most important characteristics of this material
in terms of the present invention is its ability to be
machined to very close tolerances such that it can be
fitted within an existing cylindrical housing bore by
means of an interference fit only. In fact, the material
has sufficient strength that it can be driven into the
housing bore by means of a sledge hammer. The si~plicity
of this type of fit has the great advantage of eliminating
the need for set screws,

~.23~
flanges, adhesives or other mechanical fastening devices.
~ The bearing may be in the form of a single
cylindrical member or it may be comprised of a plurality
of arcuate segments together forming a sleeve machined to
fit by interference fit within the cylindxical housing
bore. In assembling the plurality of segments, the last
segment to be inserted acts as a key and it must be driven
in with sufficient force to provide the required inter-
ference fit.
Removal of the be~ring can be facilitated by
providing one or more axially bored and tapped holes
extending into the end of the bearing. Where the bear~ng
is made up of a series of segments, it may be sufficient
to have a bored and tapped hole in only one segment. Then,
for withdrawing the bearing an eye bolt is threaded into
the tapped hole so that the entire bearing or a ~ey
segment can be pulled out when it is desired to remove the
bearing. Corrosion between the housing and the outer
face of the bearing is avoided by the very tight inter-
~0 ference fit and the continued elastomeric flexibility
enables circumferential compression of the bearing during
removal with no danger of damage to the housing.
While L/D ratios of 4:1 are common ~or elastomer
marine bearings, this invention permits the use of ratios
as low as 1.5:1. This smaller ratio permits a much greater
degree of shaft flexibility and/or hull bending. On high
speed hydrofoil vessels, for instance, where three bearing
points could be out of alignment b~ several inches under
flying conditions, short L~D ratios are very desirable.
The bearing must, however, possess su~ficient rigidity
that the de~lection of the elastomer is not excessive.

The bearing of the present invention with several times
the stiffness of conventional bearings permits these
shorter ratios and consequently yreater angular misalign-
ment withoutdangerously high bearing stresses, induced
shaft bending stresses or high wear of the fore and aft
ends of the bearings.
It is often found in practice that bearing housing
bores require re-machining to compensate for corrosion or
other damage. Also, shaft liners may be reduced in
diameter to compensate for wear or other damage. As the
bearings according to the present invention can be machined
from a mill shape, such as a tube or rod, to very precise
dimensions, they can be made to provide a proper inter-
ference fit within housings of any special diameter.
Conventional soft elastomer composite bearings
generate a water film be-tween the shaft and bearing sur-
face when the relative motion of the shaft surface passing
over the bearing surface is sufficient to induce a fluid
wedge. At slow speeds, surface to surface contact occurs
yielding boundary lubrication conditions if not dry run-
ning. The very high unlubricated dynamic coefEicients
of friction of rubber against metal (0.6-0.8) makes
operating under these conditions virtually intolerable.
The bearings of this invention have a very low dry
dynamic coefficient of friction against steel of less than
0.2. Thus, they are inherently self-lubricating and these
very low frictional values permit satisfactory bearing
operation under conditions of very slow operation, starting,
temporary loss of cooling water to an inboard stern tube
bearing, unusually high bearing pressures as a result of
damage, or operating while the vessel is out of water for

inspection purposes. The high resistance to malleable
deformation of -the present bearing permits its operation
under conditions of severe pounding which might be caused
by a bent shaft, propellor or other forces.
Another feature of the bearing of the present
invention which is made from a single homogeneous solid
polymer results from the fact that the total radial wear- -
down allowance is not limited by the thickness of a rubber
lining as in the case of a conventional composite
bearing, but by the total wall thickness which is equal
to one half the difference between the sleeve OD and housing
bore. Normally bearings would be replaced before wearing
to such a major extent, but under difficult conditions
marine bearing~ have been allowed to wear substantially
before repairs were effected. Shaft or shaft liner surface
wear as a result of running against a metallic outer sleeve
can produce costly damage.
Yet another advantage of the homogeneous con-
struction of the present bearing resides in the fact that
regardless of the quality of a mechanical adhesive bond
between two dissimilar materials, such as rubber and
naval brass or other conventionally used composite
materials, failures can occur. The use of a single
homogeneous structure eliminates any possibility of bond
failures.
Certain preferred embodiments of the present
invention are illustrated by the attached drawings in
which;
FIGURE 1 is an isometric view of a bearing
housing with a bearing inserted;
FIGURE 2 is a perspective view of a bearing

segment;
PIGURE 3 is a plan view of a bearing key
segment, and
FIGURE 4 is an end elevation of segment.
As shown in the drawings, a bearing support
(10) has a boring therein to receive a sleeve bearing 11.
While the bearing can be in the form of a unitary cylindrical
sleeve, in the drawings it is illustrated in the form of
a series of segments 12. Each segment has an arcuate
inner face 13, an arcuate outer face 15, ends 14 and -
radial edge faces 20. Axial water channels 16 are provided
extending the length of the bearing and these are conviently
made in the -form of axial recesses 17 at the inner corners
of each segment 12.
To assemble the segmented bearing, all of the
segments except one are placed into position within the
housing bore and then the key segment is forced into the
remaining gap. To assist in the insertion of the key
segment, it is convenient if the axial edges 20 are
provided with chamfers 21 at an angle of about 5 to 10
and extending one or two inches from the inboard end of
the segments. The chamfered end is then inserted into
the remaining slot and then driven all the way into
position~ ~
To facilitate removal of the bearing, one or
more bored and tapped holes 18 are formed into the end
of the bearing. For a segmented bearing as shown in the
drawings, it is sufficient to provide such a tapped hole
in only one segment since, when it is removed, the remaining
segments can all be easily moved by hand. For removal
an eye bolt 19 is turned into the tapped hole.
-- 8

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1120982 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1999-03-30
Grant by Issuance 1982-03-30

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
None
Past Owners on Record
GEORGE A. THOMSON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1994-02-15 1 11
Abstract 1994-02-15 1 21
Claims 1994-02-15 1 38
Drawings 1994-02-15 1 30
Descriptions 1994-02-15 7 269