Language selection

Search

Patent 1123472 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1123472
(21) Application Number: 1123472
(54) English Title: ANTISKID TRACTION DEVICE FOR VEHICLE WHEEL
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF ANTIPATINAGE POUR ROUE DE VEHICULE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E01C 11/24 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MARTIN, REAL (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • REAL MARTIN
(71) Applicants :
  • REAL MARTIN (Canada)
(74) Agent: PIERRE LESPERANCELESPERANCE, PIERRE
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-05-11
(22) Filed Date: 1979-02-26
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08491 (United Kingdom) 1978-03-03

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
An antiskid traction device of the type which is engaged
under a vehicle wheel to provide traction thereto when stuck in a
rut. This traction device is characterized by being constructed to
prevent sinking thereof into the snow or mud under the wheel, and to
prevent throwing thereof by the wheel. This traction device comprises
sections articulated one to another end to end, including a resilient
tongue section adapted to act as a runner or ski under the vehicle wheel,
by an intermediate section or portion engaging in the rut to provide
traction therein, and by a traction section formed of expanded metal
made wider than the tire to bear on the opposite sides of the rut thus
minimizing sinking of the traction device. The expanded metal has
nodal points selectively bent upward and downward to produce traction
projections and wheel guide projections at the top and cleats at the
bottom.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY
OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED, ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS;
1. An antiskid traction device for a vehicle wheel tire
comprising first and second elongated, antiskid traction sections
articulated end to end, and a tongue section protruding from the
outer end of said second antiskid traction section, said three
sections having a common longitudinal axis, said first and second
antiskid traction sections having gripping means protruding from
both main faces thereof, said first antiskid traction section being
relatively wider than said tire, said second antiskid section having
a width nearly equal to, but smaller than, the width of said tire
and intermediate the width of said tongue section and of said first
antiskid traction section, and interposed between the latter and said tongue
section, said tongue section being a strip which is resilient, thin
and flat both longitudinally and transversely, which is substantially
narrower than said tire, has upward projections punched out therein
for tractive engagement of said tire thereon, and being without
projections at its underside, said tongue section having an upwardly-
inclined leading edge and forms a runner element which can be slid
under said tire, said tongue section longitudinally taking the
circumferentially-curved shape of said tire and, when released,
resiliently springing back to its longitudinally flat shape.
2. An antiskid traction device as defined in claim 1, wherein
said first antiskid traction section is made of expanded metal with the
expansion thereof made longitudinally of said section and defines
filaments and nodal points interconnecting said filaments and forming up-
and-down projections on the opposite faces of the first antiskid
traction section, said projections constituting said gripping means.
3. An antiskid traction device as defined in claim 2,
wherein said nodal points include a pair of laterally-opposite outer
rows of nodal points and at least one laterally-intermediate row of
nodal points, and the nodal points in each of said laterally-opposite

rows project alternatively up and down along the corresponding rows
defining downwardly-projecting traction cleats and upwardly projecting
lateral wheel guides operatively guiding the antiskid traction device
laterally upon engagement with the vehicle wheel.
4. An antiskid traction device as defined in claim 3,
wherein the nodal points along said intermediate row alternatively
project upwardly and form tractive projections operatively engaging
the tire.
5. An antiskid traction device as defined in claim 4,
wherein said nodal points comprise three laterally-intermediate rows of
nodal points including said one intermediate row and two other rows
on opposite sides respectively of said one intermediate row.
6. An antiskid traction device as defined in claim 1, 2 or 5,
wherein said second antiskid section is made of expanded metal
with the expansion thereof made longitudinally of said second section
and defines filaments and nodal points interconnecting said filaments
and including a pair of laterally-opposite outer rows of nodal points
and one laterally-intermediate row of nodal points, and the nodal points
in each of the laterally-opposite rows of said second antiskid traction
section project alternatively up and down along the corresponding
rows defining downwardly-projecting traction cleats and upwardly-
projecting tractive projections operatively engaging the tire.
7. An antiskid traction device as defined in claim 1, 2 or
5, wherein said second antiskid traction section is integrally formed
with said tongue section, and has punched-out projections operatively
projecting up and down therefrom and constituting said gripping means.
8. An antiskid traction device as defined in claim 1, 2
or 5, further including a drag section articulated end to end to
the free end of said first antiskid traction section and having
downward projections operatively gripping in the supporting surface upon
pulling action thereon by engagement of the vehicle wheel on said drag
section.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


1~1..2347~
This inuention relat~s to a traction d~vic~ o~ tha typs
which is engaged under a traction whaal of a ushicls to prouide traction
to thc wh~el.
The traction devic~s of the aboua type which haue been
propossd so far are made of aither a sols rigid body or D~ rigid sections
articulatsd end to end. In any case, the rigidity of such traction
devices and othar construction features givs them so~e disadvantages~
In particular, such traction devicss which have been proposad so far
are prone to sink relatively deep into ths snow or ~ud upon passags
and action of the vehicls whsel thereon. This is due for instance to
its construction, to the inclined position of engagsment with ths tira,
and to the width thereof. Such traction devices of the rigid type are
alsD prons to be thrown by the wheel and thus puncturing the gas tank
if it does not sink as aforementioned~ to damage the tira, and to
laterally shift and thus lose most if not all its efficisncy. ~esides~
such prior art traction dsuices are not particularly adaptsd to grip
-~ ..
the surface and provide drag against throwing thereof by tha wheel
in particular on ice.
It is a general object of the present invention to provide
20 an improved traction device of the abovs type. i ;
It is another ganeral objsct of tha present invention to -
provide an antiskid traction device which is relatively not subjact
to sinking into the snow or mud nor to being thrown by tha vehicle wh0el.
It is a further genaral objsct of the prssent invsntion to ~ ;~
prouide an antiskid traction devics which is easy to operatively engage ~ ~;
against tha tire of a wheel and which is adapted to slide like a
runner or ski under the wheel to facilitats gripping o~ the wheel with
the devics when the wheel Ytarts to rotate.
It i3 another gsneral object of the present invention to
provide a traction device which is made of sections articulated ons
to another end to end and including a resilient section to sngage ~ ~
- 2 - ~;

~ ~ ~t A W~;~,
~LJ.~9~ J j
under the vehicle wheel and operatively curve circumferentially around
ths tire of the wheel and thus enhance sliding thereof like a runner
or ski under the wheel.
It is still another object o~ the present invention to
provide a traction device which is particu~arly adapted to produce drag
or to grip the supporting surface and thus reduce the possibility of
the traction device being dangerously thrown by the vèhicle wheel.
It is a further object of the present invention to provi~e
a traction device with outer lateral rows of upward projections to
10 laterally guide the device and oppose lateral shifting thereof from
under the vehicle wheel.
The above and other objects and advantages of the present
invention will be better understood with reference to the following
detailed description of preferred embodiments thereof which are illus-
trated, by way of examples, in the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a side view of a vehicle wheel and an antiskid
traction device according to the present invention in operative position
relative to the wheel;
Figure 2, shown on the second sheet of the drawings, is a plan
2û view of an antiskid traction device according to a first embodiment
of the present invention; `~
Figure 3, shown on the second sheet of the dràwings, is a side
elevation view as seen ~rom the bottom in Figure 2;
Figures 4, 5, and 6, shown on the first sheet of the drawings, ;;;
are cross-sectional views as seen along lines 4-4, 5-5, and 6-6 respect-
ively in Figure 2;
Figures 7 and 7a, shown on the first sheet of the drawings,
are longitudinal sections of two other embodiments of the tongue section
of the antiski traction device of of Figure 2; ;~
Fqgures 8 and 9, shown on the first sheet of the drawings
are a plan view and an elevation view respectively of a portion of an
antiskid traction device according to a second embodiment of the
invention; and
B - 3 ~ i~
. . . ` .. :
,, ~ , . .

347Z
Figures 10 and 11, shown on the second sheet o~ the drawings,
are an elevation view and a plan view respectively o~ a drag section which
may be added to any embodiment of the present invention.
The antiskid traction device of Figures 1 to 6 inclusive
comprises a tongue section 1, an intermediate antiskid traction section
2, and a wider antiski traction section 3.
The tongue section 1 is made of a strip of spring steel to
resilisntly flex circumferentially around the ordinary tire T of
a vehicle wheel W. The tongue section 1 has the longitudinal shape of
a runner or ski including an upwardly-bent outer end 4. The tongue section
is punched to form upward projections 5 which are inwardly directed
to provide grip for the tire T, such that the rotation of tha wheel will
make the tongue section 1 to slide under it drawing the remainder of ;~
the traction device with it. The tongue section 1 is substantially -
narro~er than the ordinary vehicle tire to slide easily under it when
manually pushed. Outer end 4, because it is upwardly bent, prevents
tongue section 1 from being stuck into the snow or ice when manually ~
pushed. The outer snd of section 1 can be made higher, as shown at 4~ in ~-
Figure 4~ in Figure 7, to also provide a tire grip as projections 5.
Said outer end can be simply bevelled, as shown at 4" in Figure 7a.
The intermediate antiskid traction section 2 comprises a
strip of expanded metal having a width slightly less than the width of -
an ordinary tire T to engage in the rut under the wheel. The inter- ~`
mediate antiskid traction section 2 is expanded longitudinally of the
sections 1, 2, and 3 and defines filaments 6 interconnected by three `~
longitudinal rows of nodal points 7 and 8. The nodal points 7,
of laterally-opposite outer rows of nodal points, are alternatively
raised upward and downward with respect to the plane containing central
nodal points 8, respectively forming upward projections to provide
traction to the wheel and downward projections to provide traction in
the snow or on ice. The inner end 9 of the tongue section 1 is looped
around one filament of section 2 to form an articulation between these
two sections. ~ ;
-- 4 --
.

~ ~3~7?
The wider anti~kid traction s~ction 3 i9 also made of
expanded metal and has a width exc~di~g the width of the vehicle
whasl such that the opposite lataral sdgas will bsar Dn th~ oppositH
sidss of tha rut to minimize sinking oF the whole dsuice into the snow
under ths vehicle wh0el~ Th0 section 3 i9 eXpandBd lOn9itlJdinally
of the ssctions 1, 2 and 3 and definss filamsnts 6 interconnsctsd by
fivs longitudinal rows of nodal points 7, ~ and 10. The latsrally
opposits outer rows of nodal points 7 in section 3 are alt~rnatively
raissd upward and downward with respect to tha two rows of nodal
iO point~ 10 which are all at substantially the same laval~ Prsferably
som~ nodal points 7, as indicated at 7~, are bent down further to
provids better snow grip whan the vshicle wsight is smaller~ Most
nodal points 8 of the central row in saction 3 lie in the plane of ~;
nodal points 10 but soms of the~ are raised forming longitudinally ~ ;
spaced upward projections 8I to provide better traction to tha wheel~
as shown in Figurs 4~ A metal clip 11 is clamped around one filamsnt
6 at the other end Df ths section 2 and the last nodal point 8 at one
end of tha section 3 tD hings ths two sections 2 and 3 one to the
other. Thus, the antiskid traction dsvice may bs convsniently
transported in compact position with the sections 1, 2 and 3 folded
bac~ one over another such as for instancs to use lsss space in the ~
trunk of an automobile. Clip 11 is prefsrably formad of a non rssilient ~ ;
metal strip wound on itself at least one turn and a half and then -~
flatten~d as shown in Figure 3, thereby avoiding welding of the ends
of the strip. i;
In Figurss 8 and 9? there is shown an embodiment wnerein
the intermediate section 2 and tongue section 1 are replaced by a
resilient, preferably spring steel, tongue section 12 having a narrower
portion integrally formed with 8 wider portion. The narrowar portion
of the tongue section 12 is made exactly like the afored0scrioed
- 5 - `
.

472
.
: ~`
tongue saction 1 including ths slements 4 and 5. Element 4 can
ba replaced by elemant 41 or 4". Tha widsr portion o~ the tongue
section 12 constitutes an enlargemHnt at tha innar end of the narrower
portion and includes downw~rdly punchsd out elemarlts 13 ~orming cleats
to grip in ths snow, ica, mud or the lika. The widor portion also
includes upwardly punchsd out projections 5 to provide grip ~or the
tire T of tha vehicla whael.
A mstal clip 11 clamps ths outer end of the wider portion
of section 12 to the last nodal point ~ at one end of the saction 3 to
provide articulation between the two sections.
A drag or anchor saction 14~ as shown in Figures 10 and 11
i8 pivotally attached by a bsnt portion 15 to the outer ~nd of the
saction 3, is punched out to form downward projactions 16, and is `
downwardly bent at its trailing end 17 to grip into tha snow, ice or
mud and thus produce a sufficient drag to prevant throwing of tha
antiskid traction d~vic~ by the rotating vehicle wheel W when the
lattar is about to move away from ths device.
:~'
~ ' '' : ~
, ,'
. .
: '''
: .~., .... ~ .
- 6 -
- - ~ .. : . . : . ,., i " , .. , :

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1123472 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 1999-05-11
Grant by Issuance 1982-05-11

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
REAL MARTIN
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1994-02-15 2 87
Drawings 1994-02-15 2 91
Abstract 1994-02-15 1 26
Descriptions 1994-02-15 5 197