Language selection

Search

Patent 1148365 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1148365
(21) Application Number: 1148365
(54) English Title: VAPOURMETALLURGICAL PROCESS FOR THE RECOVERY OF ULTRAPURE COBALT FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE METALLURGIE AUX GAZ POUR LA SEPARATION DU COBALT ULTRAPUR EN PRESENCE DES MELANGES AQUEUX
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22B 23/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ETTEL, VICTOR A. (Canada)
  • HALL, ROTROU A. (Canada)
  • DYMOCK, KENNETH R. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • INCO LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • INCO LIMITED (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1983-06-21
(22) Filed Date: 1980-10-08
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


PC-1196
Abstract of the Disclosure
The invention is directed to the separation of
nickel and cobalt contained in hydrometallurgical by-products
such as hydrates and carbonates occurring in plants adapted
to work up nickel, copper and cobalt ores wherein a slurry
of the initial oxidized material is reduced by hydrogen under
pressure in the presence of cobalt metal. The nickel content
of the slurry is removed by pressure carbonylation and the
remaining solution, after filtration to remove precipitated
impurities, is acidified to produce cobalt hydridocarbonyl
which is removed from the reaction mixture by sparging with
a reducing gas and is collected.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


PC-1196
WE CLAIM:
1. A process for extracting cobalt from an aqueous
basic solution containing cobalt tetracarbonyl anion which
comprises acidifying said solution with a strong acid to
generate a pH of 1.5 or more acid while sparging said solu-
tion with a stream of a gas from the group consisting of
carbon monoxide and hydrogen to volatilize cobalt as cobalt
hydridocarbonyl and separating said cobalt hydrocarbonyl
from said sparge gas stream.
2. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said
cobalt hydridocarbonyl is decomposed to metallic cobalt by
heating at a temperature between 150°C and 300°C.
3. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the
sparge gas is passed at a rate of at least 5 liters per
liter of solution per minute.
4. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the
solution of pH is at least as acid as pH 1.
5. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the
sparge gas comprises carbon monoxide and hydrogen in equal
parts by volume.
11

6. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said
solution, said acid and said sparge gas are fed on a continu-
ous basis to a reactor and spent liquor and a gas stream
containing cobalt hydridocarboyl are removed on a continuous
basis from said reactor.
7. A process for treating a metallurgical by-product
containing nickel and cobalt in oxidized form to recover
nickel and cobalt separately and to reject impurities such
as iron or copper present in said by-product which comprises
slurrying said by-product in water, hydrogen reducing the
nickel and cobalt contents thereof under pressure, pressure
carbonylating said reduced slurry under basic conditions to
volatilize and remove nickel as nickel carbonyl therefrom
and to convert cobalt to cobalt tetracarbonyl anion,
removing solid impurities, acidifying the resulting solution
to pH 1.5 or more acid while sparging said solution with a
reducing gas to volatilize and recover cobalt as cobalt
hydridocarbonyl.
8. A process in accordance with claim 7 wherein said
hydrogen reduction is conducted in the presence of finely-
divided cobalt metal.
9. A process in accordance with claim 7 wherein said
basic conditions are provided by sodium carbonate.
12

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


365
BAC~GROUND OF T~E IMVE~TION
It is known that cobalt occurs in many nickel ores
and other ores as a relatively minor c:onstituent. Because
the chemistry of cobalt and nickel are so similar, the cobalt
is carried along with the nickel through the mill and smelter.
A tendency exists to separate the cobalt from the main stream
of the material going through the refinery after smelting is
complete to provide a metallurgical or hydrometallurgical
by-product relatively rich in cobalt but with other metals
including usually nickel, iron, copper, etc~ being copresent
ther~with. The nature of the hydrometallurgical by-products
tends to be oxidic with the material being in finely divided
hydrous form as a hydrate or a carbonate with considerable
quantities of water, possibly with residual ammonia and other
compounds. Because of the physical nature of the by-products
and the difficulties of separating nickel from cobalt on a
quantitative basis, these materials are difficult to treat
although the materials and problems associated with their
treatment have been recognized in the art. As an example,
the COFFIELD U.S. Patent No. 3,728,104 is directed tG the
exact problem set forth hereinbefore. The solution suggested
by COFFIELD is to convert the nickel content of the material
in slurry form by treatment with a carbon monoxide containing
gas under conditions whereby the nickel is converted to nickel
carbonyl and the cobalt is converted to cobalttetracarbonyl
anion which is thereafter extracted from the aqueous phase
by means of an organic solvent. The potential for formation
~; of cobalt hydridocarbonyl tHCo(CO)4) is recognixed by
COFFIELD but no attempt to utilize this compound as a means
~'
~,

~8~5
for removing cobalt from the mixture is recognized. U.S.
Patents Nos. 4,097,272, 4,148,813, '815 and '816 are
directed to a similar process ~o that of COFFIELD with again
great attention being paid to the make-up of the organic
solvent used to separate cobalt from aqueous mixture. These
prior art processes are said to produce nickel of high
purity but to produce cobalt of "acceptable" purity. It is
pointed out in the art that in order to provide high purity
cobalt in accordance with the tetracarbonyl anion extraction
procedure that foreign anions such as iron and copper should
~e removed from the reaction mixture upstream of the
carbonylation. Canadian Patent No. 986r281 is also known
as disclosing the production of metal hydridocarbonyls from
solid materials contAining iron, cobalt and nickel.
; 15 S~MMAR~ OF TH~ I~VE~TION
The invention provides a process~for the recovery
of nickel and cobalt from oxidic mixtures containing the
same so as to effect the separation of the nickel and cobalt
and to provide nickel and cobalt products of high purity.
The process involves slurrying the initial material which
usually will be a hydrometallurgical by-product in finely
divided oxide, hydrate or carbonate form in water, hydrogen
reducing the nickel and cobalt contents thereof under pres-
sure in the presence of powdered cobalt metal, pressure
carbonylating the reduced slurry under basic conditions to
volatilize and remove nickel as nickel carbonyl therefrom
and to convert cobalt to cobalttetracarbonyl anion, removing
precipitated impurities and then acidifying the resulting
solution with a strong acid to a pH at least as acid as pH
'. '
~ -2-
'
,.

36S
1.5 while sparging the solution with a reducing gas to vol-
atilize and recover cobalt as cobalt hydridocarbonyl. The
volatile cobalt hydridocarbonyl is stripped from the sparge
gas and thereafter decomposed to provide a metallic cobalt
of high purity.
DESCRIPTIOI~ OF PREFE:RRISD EUBODIM~NTS
The process in accordance with the invention
involves treatment of the starting material which will be an
oxidic precipitate usually finely divided and may, for example,
be a mixed nickel/cobalt carbonate or a nickel/cobalt mixture
resulting from the precipitation of cobaltic hydroxide by
means of chlorine. The material is slurried in water in a
solids concentration of about 3~ to about 30% by weight and
pressure reduced with hydrogen at a temperature in a range
lS of about 150C to about 250C and a hydrogen partial pressure
in a range of about 200 to about 1000 pounds per square inch.
Desirably, finely divided cobalt metal is included in the
slurry to act as a catalyst in promoting the reduction of
the nickel and cobalt oxidic or carbonate material. The
benefits of cobalt powder presence during reduction are par-
,j .
ticularly marked when the cobalt and/or the nickel contents
of the material to be treated are in the trivalent form.
The cobalt metal can be obtained from other sources or by
recycle of some of the reduced metal values prior to carbony-
lation. The finely divided cobalt metal improves reaction
kinetics in reduction. After reduction, the slurry is made
basic with a material which preferably is sodium carbonate
and the slurry is then carbonylated with or without the
copresence of hydrogen. A mixture of 1 to 1 volume propor-
-3-
I

8~6~
tions of hydrogen and carbon monoxide is beneficial. Car-
bonylation i5 continued until essentially all the nickel
contained in the slurry is removed as nickel carbonyl.
Concommitantly the reduced cobalt is converted to the form
of a cobalttetracarbonyl anion (Co~CO)4-~. At this point
the slurry may be filtered to remove precipitated impurities
including any copper and iron initially present in the crude
by-product material. A liquor containing ~he cobalt as cobalt-
tetracarbonyl anion and essentially devoid of other metallic
ions results. The solution is then acidified with a strong
acid to a pH at least as acid as pH 1.5 and sparged with a
reducing gas from the group consisting of hydrogen and CO to
remove the cobalt as volatile cobalt hydridocarbonyl.
!: Carbonylation, which may be accomplished using carbon monoxide
alone or diluted up to approximately equal volume parts with
hydrogen is conducted over the carbon monoxide partial pres-
` sure range of about 100 pounds per square inch to about 2000
- pounds per square inch at a temperature in the range of about
~; 50 to 225C. A partial pressure of carbon monoxide on the
order of 500 pounds per square inch is advantageousO
It will be appreciated that the pH of the water
slurry of material initially to be treated will generally be
in the neutral to slightly acid range and that the pH oi the
slurry will generally become more acid as hydrogenation pro-
ceeds. However, if the nature of the starting material is
such that the initial water slurry is on the alkaline side
of pH 7 no untoward effect results. Carbonylation, of course,
is conducted under basic conditions preferably generated
through use of a base such as sodium carbonate. For reasons
:
.
~ I -4-
:
~:

336~
which are not presently understood, sodium carbonate appears
to be a more effective base than does sodium hydroxide.
Carbon monoxide or a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide
are passed through the basic mixture at a sufficient rate
and for a sufficient time to convert essentially all of the
nickel present in the reduced state in the mixture to volatile
nickel tetracarbonyl. The nickel tetracarbonyl product is
carried from the reaction environment by the stream of car-
bonylating gas and is separated therefrom outside the vessel
in which carbonylation is taking place. The evolving gas
mixture is checked for the presence of nickel and when nickel
is no longer detected therein, the carbonylation operation
is regarded as being complete. At this point, the reaction
mixture is filtered, then acidified to a pH to at least as
low as p~l 1.5 with a strong acid which may be for example
sulfuric or hydrochloric acid and sparging with a gas from
the group consisting of hydrogen and carbon monoxide is started
to remove from the reaction mixture cobalt as volatile cobalt
hydridocarbonyL IHCo(CO)~]. The sparge gas should be in the
amount of at least about 5 milliliters per milliliter of
liquor per minute on a carbon monoxide basis. The temperature
of the reaction mixture during the evolution of cobalt hydrido-
carbonyl should be maintained in the range of about 20 to
preferably not more than 55C. The retention time of the
mixture during cobalt evolution should preferably be about 1
hour when the pH is about 0.1 up to about 2 hours when the
pH is about 1. Desirably, the content of electrolytes such ;
as sodium sulfate should be high for example at least about
20 grams per liter during the evolution of cobalt
.
,. . . ~

336~ii
hydridocarbonyl as the presence of a large electrolyte content
in solu~ion increases the ionic strength of the solution and
assists in the removal of the cobalt hydridocarbonyl therefrom.
In this connection, it can be pointed that the cobalt hydrido-
carbonyl is not a strongly polar compound and that increasing
the polarity of the solution appears to create a salting out
effect with respect to cobalt hydridocarbonyl. Sulfates and
phosphates are desirable anions for this purpose.
Some examples will now be given. In the examples,
reduction and carbonylation were performed batchwise at ele-
vated temperature and pressure while evolution of cobalt
hydridocarbonyl was performed continuously at atmospheric
pressure to avoid formation of Co2(Co)g.
` ~XAMPLE I
' ~ 15 Into a single stage reactor provided with a stirring
device, were fed 100 grams of wet cobaltic hydroxide or 44.5g
dry cake analyzing about 54.5~ weight percent cobalt, 1%
nickel, 0.03~ copper and 0.15% iron. The crude cobaltic
hydroxide material was slurried in 1.1 liters of slurry and
80 grams of crude cobalt metal analyzing in weight percent
97.9% cobalt, 1.8~ nickel, 0.05% copper and 0.27% iron and
having a particle size of less than 400 Tyler mesh was also
introduced. The reactor was heated to 180C and hydrogen at
l a partial pressure of 500 pounds per square inch was fed
-~ 25 into the reactor for 13 minutes. At the end of hydrogen
reduction, the slurry pH was 6.3. Analysis confirmed that
more than 99% of the cobalt from the initial cobaltic hydrox-
ide slurry was reported to a crude cobalt meta~. The reaction
mixture resultlng from hydrogenation was then treated at

36~;i
150C with a gaseous mixture of equal volume proportions of
hydrogen and carbon monoxide at a partial pressure of 1000
pounds per square inch in the pre~ence of 110% stoichoimetric
excess of sodium carbonate. A gas containing nickel carbonyl
resulted which was evolved from the reactor. After the com-
pletion of nickel carbonyl evolution, which occurred after
about 240 minutes, the slurry was filtered and washed provid-
ing a copper-iron cake and a clear yellow liquor assaying in
grams per liter, 38.8 cobalt, 0.012 nickel, O.OQ2 copper and
0.022 iron. A portion of the cobalt carbonylate solution
thus produced was diluted to a cobalt content of 28 grams
per liter, was acidified at atmospheric pressure and 22C
with 6 normal hydrochloric acid and sparged with 5.33 milli-
liters of hydrogen per milliliter of solution per minute.
The cobalt-containing liquor, acid and sparge gas were fed
continuously to the bottom of a sealed single stage vessel,
with spent liquor and HCo(CO)4 containing gas being taken
off the top. Cobalt volatilization from the reaction
mixture was checked at pH levels from pH 3 to pH -0.26 with
the results set forth in the following Table I~
TABLE I
% CO volatilizedR.T. (min)
. .
-.26 95.8 60'
0 97.3 77'
1.0 86.9 149'
3.0 45.6 103'
-7-

8365
Example II
A further portion of the basic cobalt carbonylate
solution having a cobalt content of 28 grams per liter was
; treated at 23C in the manner described in Example I with a
6 normal sulfuric acid solution to provide a pH of 1. A
mixture of hydrogen and CO was sparged through the solution
at a rate of 5.33 milliliters per milliliter per minute for
various times. It was found that, at 89 minutes, 74.2% of
the cobalt was volatilized; at 96 minutes, 84% of the cobalt
was volatilized; and at 149 minutes, 86.9~ of the cobalt was
volatilized as cobalt hydridocarbonyl.
'` ,
~ample YII
`~ A cobalt carbonylate basic solution prepared gen-
~ eralIy as in the method set forth in Example I and containing
; 15 80 grams per liter of cobalt was treated at 23~C with 12
normal sulfuric acid to yield a pH of 1. The solution was
sparged with 5 milliliters per milliliter per minute of a 1
to 1 mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide at a retention
time of 83 minutes~ Two tests were conducted, in one of
which the solution also contained 154 grams per liter of
sodium sulfate and in the other of which no sodium sulfate
was present. It was found that, in the retention time
employed, the cobalt carbonylate solution containing sodium
sulfate yielded a 73.2% cobalt volatilization at 83 minutes
whereas the solution containing no sodium sulfate yielded a
volatization of only 47.2% of the cobalt in the same timeO
:` :
8-
,~;
:

33~i5
~ample IV
To illustrate the effect of temperature during the
evolution of cobalt hydridocarbonyl from a basic solution
containing cobalt carbonylate~ i.e., cobalttetracarbonyl
anion, a run was made at a temperature of 90C treating a
basic solution containing 70 grams per liter of cobalt with
a 12 normal sulfuric acid solution to yield a pH of 2. In
90 minutes of sparging with 5 milliliters per milliliter per
minute carbon monoxide, 96% of the cobalt was volatilized
but the formation of insoluble black solids (likely tetra-
cobalt dodecacarbonyl) occurred.
:
Example V
A cobalt carbonylate basic solution containing 25
grams per liter of cobalt was treated in the manner described
in Example I with 3 normal sulfuric acid to pH 1~ I'he solu-
tion was sparged with carbon monoxide at rates of 2, 5 and
lO milliliters per milliliter per minute for 59 minutes
residence time at each sparging rate and it was found that,
respectively, 51.6%, 64% and 83.7% of cobalt was volatilized.
.
~ample VI
A comparison between the use of carbon monoxide
alone and an equal volume of mixture of hydrogen and carbon
monoxide was conducted in the treatment of an 80 grams per
liter cobalt-containing basic solution treated with 12 normal
sulfuric acid to pH 1 using a sparge rate of 10 milllliters
per milliliter per minute as in Example I. It was found
_9_
I

3~
that after 92 minutes using carbon monoxide alone 96% of the
cobalt was volatilized, and after 83 minutes using the mixture
of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, 73.2% of the cobalt was
volatilized indicating a superior result for the use of carbon
monoxide alone as sparge gas.
Cobalt powder produced by the decomposition of
cobalt hydridocarbonyl gas when thermally decomposed in a
temperature range of 150 to 300C was found to yield a cobalt
powder containing as impurities only 30 parts per million of
nickel, 0.4 part per million of iron, and 0~1 parts per
million of copper. The process of the invention provides a
means for separating nickel and cobalt contained in crude
material which heretobefore had been regarded as being diffi-
~` cult to handle. In addition, the process of the invention
affords the means not only of separating the nickel and cobalt
but of providing nickel and cobalt in highly pure form.
Although the present invention has been described
in con~unction with preferred embodiments, it is to be under-
stood that modifications and variations may be resorted to
without departing from the spirit and scope of the inven-
tion, as those skilled in the art will readily understand.
Such modifications and variations are considered to be within
the purview and scope oi the invention and appended claims.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1148365 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2011-07-26
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: First IPC derived 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2000-06-21
Grant by Issuance 1983-06-21

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
INCO LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
KENNETH R. DYMOCK
ROTROU A. HALL
VICTOR A. ETTEL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1994-01-11 1 24
Drawings 1994-01-11 1 22
Claims 1994-01-11 2 63
Abstract 1994-01-11 1 18
Descriptions 1994-01-11 10 401