Language selection

Search

Patent 1151881 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1151881
(21) Application Number: 1151881
(54) English Title: COBALT METAL POWDER BY HYDROGEN REDUCTION
(54) French Title: PRODUCTION DE POUDRE METALLIQUE DU COBALT PAR REDUCTION A L'HYDROGENE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B22F 9/26 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ETTEL, VICTOR A. (Canada)
  • DEVUYST, ERIC A.P. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • INCO LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • INCO LIMITED (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1983-08-16
(22) Filed Date: 1980-08-21
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


Abstract of the Disclosure
Cobalt powder is produced by the elevated
temperature and pressure hydrogen reduction of cobaltous
sulfate solution wherein sodium hydroxide solution is
introduced at a rate which does not exceed the rate of
sulfuric acid generation. The powder after a number of
densifications is of high density, has a good appearance
and may be handled in air without difficulty.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


PC-2120/CAN
WE CLAIM:
1. A process for producing dense cobalt powder of coarse,
relatively uniform particle size which comprises subjecting a
portion of a cobaltous sulfate solution to hydrogen reduction
at a hydrogen partial pressure of at least one megapascal and
a temperature of at least about 180°C in the presence of a
reaction initiator while introducing sodium hydroxide solution
at a rate not substantially exceeding the rate of sulfuric acid
production due to hydrogen reduction, continuing the hydrogen
reduction to reduce substantially all the cobalt content of
said portion with production of end reduction solution and
cobalt powder, repeating said hydrogen reduction cyclically
with fresh successive portions of cobaltous sulfate solution
with each successive reduction being performed in the presence
of substantially all the cobalt powder formed in the previous
cycle to provide a densified cobalt powder product.
2. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said
reduction initiator is fine, discrete cobalt powder having a
particle size not exceeding about 20 microns.
3. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said
cobaltous sulfate solution contains about 50 to about 100
grams per liter of cobalt.
4. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the
pH of the reaction mixture is at least as acid as about pH
4 during reduction.

5. A process in accordance with claim 2 wherein said
cobalt powder has an average particle size in the range of
about 1 to about 5 microns.
6. Cobalt powder of coarse relatively uniform particle
size, having a smooth surface, a density in the range of
about 4.5 to about 5.5 grams per cubic centimeter, with at
least 98% of the particles exceeding 75 microns in size.
7. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the
cobaltous sulfate solution is prepared from an impure cobaltic
hydroxide precipitate by the steps comprising
a. addition of sulfuric acid to provide a pH less
than 1 and aeration to lower the chloride level
to less than 100 ppm
b. addition of methanol to solubilize in excess of
80% of the cobalt and then addition of hydrogen
peroxide to essentially complete the dissolution
of cobalt
c. addition of base to raise the pH to about 5.5
to precipitate iron
d. filtering to obtain a cobaltous sulfate solution
which is further purified by contacting with a
copper-nickel selective ion exchange resin.
21

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


P~ 20/CAN 115~8~
Field of the Invention
-
The invention pertains to the field of producing
cobalt metal powder by hydrogen reduction from a cobalt con-
taining solution.
Background of the Invention
. .
Hydrogen reduced elemental cobalt powder is an
article of commerce. One presently available commercial
product is known to be produced by hydrogen reduction of
aqueous cobalt ammine ammonium sulfate solutions usIng a
catalyst such as a sodium sulfite-sodium cyanide c~talyst.
The nucleation of cobalt powder in t~is system is ~rre~ular,
resulting in production of powder having an apparent density
of 0.6 to 1 gm/cubic centimeter. In order to prov~de a
denser commercial product, repeated densification cycles are
employed which deposit further co~alt upon the initially
formed powder from fresh cob~lt-containin~ solution. In
this manner the particle size is increased suc~ that poss~bly
about 60% of the product will have a greater particle size
than 200 mesh on a Tyler screen scale (75 microns~, and t~e
apparent density of the product increases to approx~matel~
3.~ gm/cubic centimeter. The cobalt bite per reduct~on
cycle is on the order of about 40 gm/l and ~bout 30~ of the
cobalt metal is recycled and redissolved in the reduct~n of
cobaltic ion to cobaltous ion in the feed cobaltic amnine
ammonium sulfate solution. The average hydro~en reduction
cycle is reported to require about 30 minutes. The final
cobalt powder particles have an irregular shape with a rough
pebbly surface. In many instances the powder is a d~rk grey
to black in colo.r. The product produced must ~e handled

carefully and exposure to air is avoided until the powder
product is cool. Drying of the washed cobalt powder ~s
usually conducted in an atmosphere of hydrogen or nitrogen.
It would be desirable to provide a cobalt powder
of uniform coarse particle size having a higher apparent
density than the produst presently available.
Prior Art
Th~ prior art is exemplified by the nickel prefer-
ential reduction scheme which is set forth in a paper ~y
Schaufelberger and Roy entitled "Separation of Copper,
Nickel and Cobalt by Selective Reductions from A~ueous Solution",
Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, London,
Vol. 64, 1954-1955, pages 375-3~3 and in U S. Patents 2,694,005
and 2,694,006. The soluble cobaltic ammine scheme i~ disclosed
in U.S. Patents 2,767,055 and 2,767,054. Another hydrogen
reduction process wherein the leach solution is made alkaline
with ammonia, is described in a paper by Mitchell entitled
"Cobalt Pressure ~eaching and Reduction at ~arfield", which
appeared in Jourhal of Metals, March 1~57 on pages 343-345.
Direct gaseous reduction of cobaltous oxide or hydroxide
aqueous slurries to cobalt metal has been reported in the
literature, for example, Schaufelber~er U.S. Patent 2,805,149
and papers by R. Soubirous et al which appeared in C. R. Acid. Sc.,
Paris, t. 270, pages 1595-1597 and by Dobrokhoto~ et al
which appeared in C~e-tn. Metally, 35, 1962, page 44, In
~ .
many of the processes the starting material is cobaltic
hydroxide which must be converted to the co~altous for~.
The dissolution of cobaltic hydroxide with an organic reductant
such as methanol has been disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,151,258
-- 2 --

11531 88~
and in an article by L. Syper entitled "Oxidation of Some Organ-
ic Compounds by Cobalt (III) Hydroxide", Roczniki Chemii, Vol. 47,
No. 1, pages 43-48, (1973). The use of nucleating ayents in
hydrogen reduction processes is disclosed in U.S. Patents Nos.
2,767,081, 2,767,082 and 2,767,083.
Summary of the Invention
The process of the invention may generally be defined as a
process for producing dense cobalt powder of coarse, relatively
uniform particle size which comprises subjecting a portion of a
cobaltous sulfate solution to hydrogen reduction at a hydrogen '
partial pressure of at least one megapascal and a temperature
of at least about 180C in the presence of a reaction initiator
while introducing sodium hydroxide solution at a rate not sub-
stantially exceeding the rate of sulfuric acid production due
to hydrogen reduction. The hydrogen reduction is continued to
reduce substantially all the cobalt content of said portion with
production of end reduction solution and cobalt powder. The
hydrogen reduction is repeated cyclically with fresh successive
portions of cobaltous sulfate solution and with each successive
reduction being performed in the presence of substantially all
the cobalt powder formed in the previous cycle to provide a
densified cobalt powder product.
The invention includes the product of the process ~ust des-
cribed, namely a cobalt powder of coarse/ relatively uniform
particle size, having a smooth surface and a density in the range
of about 4.5 to about 5.5 grams per cubic centimeter with at
least 98% of the particles exceeding 75 microns in size.
Description of the Drawing
Figure 1 is a photomicrograph taken at 200 diameters of a
fine, commercial cobalt powder of a kind useful as seed particles
1 -,
.. ~

~53~8131
in accordance with the invention;
Figure 2 is a photomicrograph taken at 200 diameters of
a product powder after 2 densifications using the seed powder
of Figure l;
Figure 3 is a photomicrograph taken at 200 diameters of
a product powder in accordance with the invention after 4
densifications starting initially from the seed powder of
Figure l;
-3(a)

~l15~
Figure 4 is a photomicrograph taken at 200 diameters of
a product powder in accordance with the invention a~ter 6
densifications starting initially with the seed powder of
Figure l;
Figure 5 is a photomicrograph taken at 200 diameters of
a cobalt powder obtained as a result of self-nucleation; and
Figure 6 is a photomicrograph taken at 200 diameters of
a product powder obtained after 6 densifications using as
seed powder the powder of Figure 5.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The invention is directed to a method for producing
dense elemental cobalt powder of coarse relatively uniform
particle size and to the product resulting from the method.
The method comprises hydrogen reduction at elevated temperature
and pressure of cobaltous sulfate aqueous solutions. The
steps employed involve heating a feed cobalt sulfate solution
which contains about 50 to ~bout 100 grams per liter of
cobalt in a sealed autoclave to a temperature of at least
about 180C and in the presence of cobalt metal powder which
functions as a seed or initiator, introducing hydrogen into
the autoclave at a partial pressure of at least 1 megapascal,
i.e., at least 150 psi, thereafter introducing a sodium
hydroxide solution into the vessel at a controlled rate
which does not substantially exceed the rate of formation of
sulfuric acid due to the hydrogen reduction of cobal~ sulfate.
This is achieved by maintaining the pH of the solution
during cobalt reduction below about pH 4. The addition of
sodium hydroxide is stopped when about 80% to 95~ of the
-- 4

~l15~88~
cobalt in solution has been reduced. Thereafter, the end
reduction solution from the autoclave is withdrawn and is
replaced with fresh feed cobalt sulfate solution. The
aforementioned steps are then repeated to densify the cobalt
metal powder and until cobalt powder of the desired particle
size is obtained. The seed cobalt powder employed to initiate
the precipitation of cobalt during hydrogen reduction may be
finely divided cobalt powder produced from other sources or
produced by a reaction similar to the foregoing~ For example,
extra fine cobalt powder having a particle size in the range
of 1 to 20 microns, known in the trade as "Afrimet" powder,
may be employed. Alternatively, cobalt powder produced by
the thermal decomposition of cobalt oxalate as for example
by heating cobalt oxalate at 500C under nitrogen for 15
minutes may be employed. Seed powder may be generated by
nucleation using sodium cyanide and sodium sulfide as
nucleating agents in the first hydrogen pressuri~ed batch.
Finally, self-nucleated cobalt powder from the first reduc~
tion liquor may be employed. The respective types of seed
~ cobalt powders have different physical shapes and surface
area per unit weight. The very small needle shape particles
and large surface area which charac-terize the Afrimet cobalt
powder renders it a preferred starting material. Thermally
decomposed cobalt o~alate also produces fine needle shaped
particles. [but not as fine as the Afrimet product] Powder
produced by nucleation with sodium cyanide and sodium sulfide
as catalysts is irregularly shaped and of large particle
size. Self-nucleated cobalt powder is in the form o~ large
porous powders. The finely divided needle-shaped initiating
powders permit densification by growth of individual particles

8~3~
or aggregates of particles during reduction. With the
porous types of cobalt powder seed there is a tendency for
the hydrogen reduced cobalt to deposit in the void space of
the large cobalt seed particles resulting in loss of available
surface area. Such products have lower apparent density
than do products seeded with fine, discrete cobalt powder.
The use of the fine, discrete seed powder having a particle
size of about 1 to 5 microns on the average, e.g., not exceeding
about 2 microns on the average, is thus preferred.
It will be appreciated that one mole of sulfuric
acid is formed for each mole of cobalt sulfate that is
reduced. It is important that the rate of addition of
sodium hydroxide be such that the addition of sodium hydroxide
to neutralize the sulfuric acid formed with the production
of sodium sulfate and water not exceed the rate of formation
of sulfuric acid. If the addition rate of sodium hydroxide
exceeds the rate of formation of sulfuric acid, cobaltous
hydroxide can form which has a tendency to provide self-
nucleated cobalt powder and which interferes with densification
of the cobalt powder already present. A saturated NaOH solu-
tion is used to avoid dilution.
It will be appreciated that in starting with fine,
discrete cobalt powder particles upon which the newly reduced
cobalt is precipitated t hat successive operations whereby
the cobalt powder remains in the autoclave for the treatment
of successive batches of cobalt sulfate solution provide
larger cobalt particles having smooth surfaces and having a
density in the range of about 4.5 to 5.5 grams/cc. At this
density, the cobal~ powder is found to be densified such
that 98% or more of the particles exceed 2Q0 mesh Tyler

~5~8~
screen scale. The particles have a uniform spherical shape
and appear bright to the eye. The product can be washed and
dried in the presence of air. The cobalt bite per reduction
cycle can be as high as 90 grams/liter. The end reduction
liquor contains no ammonium sulfate and the residual dissolved
cobalt can be recovered by simple hydrolysis. The average
reduction cycle duxation can be as low as 30 minutes.
The source of the cobalt sulfate feed solution
treated in accordance with the invention is immaterial.
Desirably the feed solution should be substantially free of
impurities which co-reduce or co-precipitate with cobalt
during hydrogen reduction. Thus the contents of nickel,
copper, iron and lead should be as low as possible. In
addition, species such as chloride ion should be very low,
e.g., less than 100 gpm, since such ions tend to be corrosive
toward the autoclave. In addition~ unsaturated sul~ur
species, i.e., all sulfur compounds except sulfate ~h~ch can
lead to sulfur contamination of the cobalt product, e,g.,
dithionate ion should be removed.
The invention advantageously is applied to the
recovery of cobalt from cobaltic ox~de hydrate obtaIned by
oxidation-precipitation of cobalt from process le~ch solu-
tions using sodium hypochlorite and a ~ase. Treatment o~
cobaltic hydrate to provide cobalt sulfate feed solution
suitable or recovery of a cobalt as cobalt pow~e~ according
to the invention may comprise the following steps:
3~

~15~8~31
l) treat Co(OH) 3 with H2SO4 and water at 60C
for 30 minutes, with suitable agitatian
and aeration to eliminate the soluble Cl
as Cl2 according to the xeaction: ~'
2Co(OH) 3 ~ 6H + 2Cl ~ 2Co ~ C12 * 6H
(The r~action is only favoxable at pH
1.5, preferably pH 0.5-l.O.~
2) add methanol to the dechlorinated slurry
in the presence of suf~'icient ~I2SO4.~ ea~y
ad~d in step 1~ to solubilize the'Co as
Co at 60C, according to the react~on;
6Co~OH)3 ~ 6H2SO4 + CH30H ~ 6CoS04 ~ CO2 ~ 17H
(This reaction however, does not ~o to
completion unless lar~e excesses of ~2SO4
and CH30H are added. In the presence of
the stoichiometric amount ~f ~2S.04 and
1.2 times the ~toichiometric amount of
CH30H, 85 to 90% of the Co is d~.ssolved
(i.e., at least about 80%1 in one'~our
at 60C with a final pH reading of 1.5
to 2Ø
3) add a small amount of H202 to the leach
slurry to complete t~e dissolution of
Co(OH)3 according to the'reaction
2Co(OH) 3 ~ 2H2SO4 ~ H202 ~ 2CoS04 ~ 6H20 ~ 02
Complete dissolution of the CotOH~ 3 iS
obtained by keeping the pH below about
2.5.
4) add 0.5 to 1.0 g/l of BaCOg for precip~-
tation of Pb, at 60~C and pH ~2.5.
5) neutralize the excess H2S04 with'CoCO3
or Na2CO3 to pH 5.5. In thi:s step Fe
and Cll are precipitated as t~eir
hydroxides.
6~ separate the leach liquor fxom th.e
leach residue, containing Pb, Fe ~nd
Cu, by filtration.

~:~Sl~
7) treat the leach solution through a Cu,
Ni selective ion exchange resin (such
as XF-4195--by Dow Chemical Company)
to remove the residual Cu and the
required amount of Ni.
8) recover Co in the elemental form from
the purified leach solution by the
process of the invention.
Some examples will now be given.
Example I
6.3 kg of wet Co(OH) 3 cake analyæing in weight
percent Co 27.6, Ni 0.48, Fe 0.06, Cu 0.Q03, Zn 0.001 and Cl
0.2, were slurried with water and 3 kg of concentrated H2SO4
to a volume of 15 Q. The slurry was heated to 60C and
stirred while air was sparged through it for 30 minutes to
remove the chloride ion content as gaseous chlorine. At
this point the slurry pH was at 0.1 and less than 5~ of the
cobalt in the cake was dissolved.
2G The dechlorinated slurry was then subjected tQ a
reductive leach ~y introducing a pure methanol solut~on into
it at a rate of 600 ml/h for 15 minutes. The prosress of
the leach was followed by monitoring the pX which lncreased
from 0.1 to 1.5 in one hour. ~t p~ 1.5 about 85% of the feed
Co(OH) 3 had been dissolved and further dissolution o~ Co(OH~ 3
was very slow due to lack of ~2S4 and methanol. Complete
reaction with methanol would require not only excess of
methanol, but a large excess of H2SO4 ~p~ ~ 1 in t~e Pnd
dissolution liquor) which ~ust be neu~xalized with ~ase. T~s
operation would be costly.
Methanol was therefoxe substituted by ~2O2 whi~ch
reacts with Co(OH) 3 as a reducing agent belo~ p~ 4. A 30% H202
solution was added into the leach slurry at a rate of 75 ml~h

- 1.15~
for 140 minutes. At this point completion of the leach was
evidenced by a sharp change in color from black to pink.
During the completion of the leach the pH was kept at 1.5 with
H2SO4 when required. This pH is preferred for the subsequent
Pb removal operation. Lead was removed from solution by the
addition of 0.5 g of BaCO3 per liter of solution. Ater 30
minutes at 60C, the solution was neutralized to pH 5.5
using a 100 g/l Co containing CoC03 slurry. After filtration
the liquor was passed through a Ni selective IX resin for Ni
removal. The final purified solution assayed 96 g/l Co and
0.038 g/l Ni, and in mg/l Cu l, Pb ~ 0.3, Fe 1, Zn 5 and Cl
30.
Leach solution prepared in the aforedescribed
manner but assaying 92.2 g/l Co, 1.3 g/l Ni, 0.3 mg/1 Cu, 0.3
mg/l Pb and 0.6 mg/l Fe was treated for cobalt recovery in the
elemental powder form as follows: 0.8 Q of leach solution
and 10 g of fine, discrete Co powder having an apparent density
of 0.6 gm/cc were placed and sealed in a 2 Q capacity Parr
all Ti autoclave provided with a twin pxopellor a~itator
which was rotated in all runs at 1000 rpm. The suspension
was heated to 200C and H2 was admitted to the autoclave at
a partial pressure of 1.3 MPa (total pressure of 3 MPa or
450 psig). A 9.4 N NaOH solution was then pu~ped into the
autoclave at a rate of 150 ml/h for 90 minutes, representin~
an NaOH addition rate of l.l mole per mole of cobalt per
hour. The pH of the solution during NaOH addition ~as
between 2.0 and 3Ø The reduction was continued after NaOH
addition for 20 minutes to ensure complete elimination of
Co(OH) 2 . The end reduction solution was cooled to 80~C and
withdrawn from the autoclave through a carbon f~lter, leaving
-- 10 ~-

~s~
the Co powder inside the autoclave. ~bout 100 ml of end
reduction liquor was left in the autoclave.
0.8 Q of fresh feed CoS04 leach solution was
pumped into the autoclave and the H2 reduction cycle was
repeated as above. After 6 cycles (or densifications), the
total amount of Co powder was washed and dried in air at ~-
room temperature. The final powder contained 97~ cobalt, 2%
nickel, and in ppm ~15 copper, <40 ixon, 14 zinc, 170
sulfur and 590 carbon. Table I illustrates the densification
achieved during the 6 cycles.
TABLE I
Cobalt Powder
,. ~ .
Reduction % Apparent Co ~reduced
Cycle S Density Reduced Cseed
` (g/cm3~ (g~ tg/g~
1 0.058 2.0 56 5.6
2 0.024 4.1 104 10.~
4 0.019 5.~ 20~ 20.9
6 ~.017 5.5 300 30.0
The stxucture of the ~inely-divided cobalt seed
powder employed in t~is Example is shown in F;~gure 1 and o~
the product powder after 2, 4 and 6 densifications is shown
in Figures 2, 3 and 4 all at 200 diameters. The correlation
between density and particle cize is marked.
Example II
The H2 reduction pxocedure used in Ex~mple I was
repeated but using feed leach salution ~ssayLng 85.5 gjl Co,
-- 11 --

1 ~5~
0.13 g/l Ni, 0.2 mg/l Cu, 0.3 mg/l Pb and 0O9 mg/l Fe.
After 8 reduction cycles the cobalt powder was washed and
dried in air. The cobalt powder product contained 99% by
weight cobalt, 0.32% nickel and, in ppm, 7 copper, 20 iron,
< 10 lead, < 5 zinc, 280 sulfur and 630 carbon. Table II
illustrates the densification achieved during the 8 cycles.
TABLE II
Cobalt Powder
Reduction % Apparent Co Creduced
10Cycle S Specific Reduced Cseed
Gravity
(g/cm3) (g) (g/g)
2 0.024 2.35 77.9 7.8
4 0.025 4.59 156.1 15.6
6 0.027 5.48 218.0 21.8
8 0.028 5.50 273.5 27.4
Example III
Leach solution assaying 96 g/l Co, 0.038 g/1 Ni,
0.3 mg/l Cu, 0.2 mg/l Pb, 1.3 mg/l Fe and 5 mg/l Zn was
treated for Co recovery in the elemental powder for~ as
follows: 0.8 Q o leach solution and 40 g of fine, d~screte
cobalt powder (Afrimet) were placed in a 2 ~ capac~ty Parr
Ti autoclave. The suspension was heated wit~ stixr~ng to
200C and H2 was introduced into the vessel at a partial
pressuxe of lo 2 MPa (total pressure of 3 MPa~. ~ 9.4 N NaOH
solution was pumped into the autocla~e at a rate of 780 ml~h
(5.5 moles NaOH per mole of cobalt per hour~ for 18 ~inut~s
- 12 -

ll~lB~3~
and 20 seconds. The pH of the solution during NaOH addition
was between 2 and 3. The reduction was continued thereafter
for another 11 minutes and 40 seconds. (Total time 30
minutes). The end reduction liquor was cooled and withdrawn
from the autoclave through a Ti inlet tube equipped with a
carbon filter. About 100 ml of end reduction liquor and the
reduced Co powder were left in the autoclave.
0.8 Q of fresh feed CoS04 leach solution were
pumped in the autoclave and the H2 reduction cycle ~as
repeated under the conditions mentioned above. After 11
such cycles, the total amount of Co powder ~as withdrawn,
washed and dried in air at room temperature.` T~e powder
contained 99% cobalt and 0.042% nickel, by we~ght, and, in
ppm, 5 copper, 33 iron, 2 lead, 2 zinc and 210 sulfur.
Results are shown in Table III. Again the S
content was decreased and the apparent density of the Co
powder was increased with increasing number of c~cles.
~ABLE III
Co~alt Powder
Co -
20 Reduction %~pparent Co re-duced
Cycle - 5Density Reduced Cseed ~ -
--
1 0.083 0.8 51 1.3
3 0.040 1.9 160 4.
6 0.018 3.8 310 7.8
8 0.026 4.3 420 10.5
11 0.021 ~.7 5~0 14.0
- 13 -

~.~IS~8~L
E~ample IV
Feed CoS04 leach solution prepared by the method
described in Example I and assaying 92 g/l Co, 0.035 g/l Ni,
~ 0.1 mg/l Cu, 1.1 mg/l Fe, < 0.25 mg/l Pb, and 2 mg/l Zn
was treated for Co recovery by ~2 reduction in the following
manner: 0.8 Q of CoSO 4 leach solution and 30 g of Co powder,
made by decomposition of cobalt oxalate crystals at 500C
under N2 atmosphere for 15 minutes, were placed in a 2 Q
capacity Parr Ti autoclave. The suspension was heated to
~ 200C and H2 was introduced into the autoclave at a partial
pressure of 1.3 MPa (total pressure of 3 MPa¦. ~ 9.95 N
NaOH solution was then pumped into the autaclave at a Xate
of 150 ml/h or 90 minutes. The pH of the solution during
NaOH addition was between 2.5 and 3.5. The reduction was
carried out thereafter for another 30-minutes during which
the pH of the solution decreased to 2.5. The end xeduction
liquor was cooled to 80C and wit~drawn from the autoclave
through a Ti inlet tube equipped with a carbon filter. Q.8
Q of fresh CoS04 solution was fed to the autoclave and the H2
reduction cycle was repeated as above 11 times. ~t the end
of 11 cycles, the Co powder was washed and dried in air.
The cobalt powder contained, by weight, ~ cobalt and
0.083% nickel and, in ppm, 12 copper, 32 ~ron, 9 le~dJ 4
zinc and 518 sulfur.
The satisfactory densificat~on ~chieved i5 ~llus-
trated in Table IV.
- 14 -

~lS~
TABLE IV
Cobalt Powder
Reduction % Apparent Co Creduced
Cycle S Density Reduced ~seed
(g/cm3) (g) (y/g)
3 - 3.3 155 5.2
6 - 4.3 271 9.0
ll 0.~5 4.7 518 17.3
In order to illustrate the unsatisfactory results
obtained when sodium hydroxide is introduced during ~eduction
at a rate substantially exceeding the rate of sulfuric acid
production, the following is given:
Example A
Feed CoS04 leach solution assaying 86 g~l Co,
0.046 g/l Ni, 0.3 mg/l Cu, 0.4 mg/l Pb and 2 ~g/l Fe was
treated for Co recovery by H2 reduction in the following
manner: 0.7 Q of CoS04 leach solution and 10 ~ of AfriInet
Co powder were placed in a 2 Q capacity Parr Ti autoclave.
The suspension was heated to 2Q0C and H2 was introduced
into the vessel at a partial pressure of 1.3 Mpa ttot~l
pressure of 3 MPa~. A 10 N NaOH solution was then pu~ped
into the autoclave at a ra.te of 1.44 Q~h ~12 ~oles NaOH pe~
mole of cobalt per hour~ for 7 minutes and 3Q se~onds~ T~e
pH of the solution during NaOH addit~on incre~sed from 2.0
to 7Ø The reduction was carried on thereafter until the
pH in the solution was below about 3. This took about 110
minutes. The end reduction liquor was cooled to 80C and
withdrawn from the autoclave through a Ti inlet tube e~uipped

~:~5~Lt3~31
with a carb~n filter. 0.7 Q of fresh CoS04 solution was fed
into the autoclave and the H2 reduction cycle was repeated
as above 8 times. At the end of 8 cycles, the produced Co
powder was washed and dried in air. The Co powder was light
and porous. About 3% of the Co was plastered onto the
autoclave internals. The powder contained 99% co~alt and
0.05~ nickel and, in ppm, 5 copper, 30 iron, < 5 lead, 6 zinc,
1,000 sulfur and 500 carbon.
Results are shown in Table A. Evidently with a
fast NaOH addition rate and only 10 g of Afrimet seed powder,
the apparent density of the Co powder was much lower than in
the tests descrihed in the preceding examples.
TABLE A
Cobalt Powder
Reduction ~ Apparent Co Creduced
Cycle S DensityReduced Cseed
~g/cm3)- (gl (g/g~ _
-
8 0.10 1.7 413 41.3
Two attempts were made to produc~ a hydrogen-
reduced cobalt powder using self-nucleated seed powder with
unsatisfactory results as set forth in the following Examples
B and C.
Example B
Leach solution assaying 96 g~l Co, 0.038 g/l Ni,
< 0.3 mg/l Cu, < 0.3 mg/l Pb, 1.3 mg/l Fe and 5 mg/l Zn was
treated for cobalt powder recovery as follows: 0.7 Q of
- 16 -

8~
leach solution was sealed in a 2 Q Ti autoclave and heated
to 200C. A lo 3 MPa partial pressure of H2 was admitted to
the autoclave and 0.1 Q of solution containing 20 g/l NaCN
and 2 g/l Na2S was pumped in. This was followed by the
addition of a 9.4 N NaOH solution at a rate of 780 ml~h for
18 minutes and 36 seconds. The reduction was continued
after NaOH addition for about 12 minutes. The autocla-~e
contents were cooled to 80C and the solution was withdrawn
from the vessel through a Ti inlet tube e~uipped with a
carbon filter.
0.7 Q of fresh feed CoS04 leach soluti~n Was
pumped in the autoclave, heated to 200~C and pressurized
with H2 to a total pressure of 3 MPa ~450 psig~. ~ 9.4 N
NaOH solution was pumped in a rate of 780 ml~h for 16 ~inutes
and the reduction was carried out ~or a total time of 30
minutes. After cooling and solution withdra~al, t~e reduction
cycle was repeated 5 times. The pH of the solution during
NaOH addition was be~ween 2.5 and 3O0. After 5 cycles, the
Co powder was washed and dried in air. The powder conta~ned
99% cobalt and 0.05% nickel, by weight, and in ppm, 4 copper,
150 iron, c 10 lead, ~ 10 zinc and 450 sul~ur.
Densification results are shown in Table ~.
TAB~ B
Cobalt Powder
Reduction % ~pparent Co Creduced
Cycle S DensityReduced Cnucleat~d
~g~cm ) (g) ~g/g~
0 (nucleation) - - 63 0
2 0.152 1.15 155 2.46
0.045 2O50 274 4.35

Example C
Leach solution assaying 92 g/l Co, 0.032 g/l Ni,
~ 0.1 mg/l Cu, 1 mg/l Fe, < 0.25 mg/1 Pb and 2 mg/l Zn was
treated for cobalt powder recovery as follows: 0.8 Q of
CoSO~ leach solution was heated in autoclave to 200C and H2
was admitted at 1.3 MPa partial pressure. A 9.4 N NaOH
solution was pumped in at a rate of 1.2 Q/h for 15 minutes
(equivalent to 99% of the Co as Co(OH) 2 ) and the reduGtion
was continued thereafter for another 35 minutes. ~fter
cooling the end reduction liquor was pumped out ~nd 0.8 Q of
fresh feed CoS04 solution was pumped in. After heat~ng to
200C, H2 was admitted at 1.3 MPa partial pressure (3 ~Pa
total pressure) and a 9.4 N NaOH solution was pumped in at
0.7 Q/h for 17 minutes. The reduction was continued thereafter
for 23 minutes. During NaOH addition, the pH of the reduct;on
liquor varied between 2.7 and 3.9. The end reduction liquor
was cooled and removed through a Ti inlet equipped with
carbon filter. After adding 0.8 Q of fresh feed CoS04
solution the reduction cycle was repeated under the same ;
conditions. After 6 cycles, the Co powdex was xemoved,
washed and dried in air. The powder contained 99% cobalt,
0.09% nickel, by weight, and, in ppm, 240 copper, 240 iron,
<10 lead, < 10 zinc, 1000 sulfur.
Densification results are ~iven in Ta~le C.
- 18 -

~L15~L8~
TABLE C
CobalJc Powder
Reduction % Apparent Co Creduced
Cycle S Specific Reduced Cnucleated
Gravity
(~/cm3) (g) (g/g)
0 (nucleation) - - 72 0
3 0.04~ 3.6 220 3.0
6 0.100 3.6 350 5.0
The structure of the seed powder at 200 diameters is
shown in Figure 5. A large amount of void space is evident.
The powder structure obtained after 6 dens~ficat;ons ~s shown
in Figure 6. The powder is still porous and the tendency to
deposit reduced cobalt in t~e void space`of the seed ~articles
is illustrated. The density of the product is notabl~ low.
However, when the porous seed powder of Figure 5 ~s su~ected
to a light grind, as in a ball mill, fine discrete powder
particles are produced which are satisfactory as seed powder
for the production of a dense cobalt powder product after a
number of densifications.
Althou~h the present invention has been described
in conjunction with preferred embodiments, it is to be under~
stood that modifications and variatiOnsmay ~e xesoxted to
without departing from t~e spirit and scope ~f the ~nvention t
as those skilled in the art will readily understand. ~ch
modifications and variations are considered to ~e within t~e
purview and scope of the invention and appended cla~ms.
-- 19 --

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1151881 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2011-07-26
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: First IPC derived 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2000-08-16
Grant by Issuance 1983-08-16

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
INCO LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
ERIC A.P. DEVUYST
VICTOR A. ETTEL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-01-13 2 340
Cover Page 1994-01-13 1 13
Abstract 1994-01-13 1 11
Claims 1994-01-13 2 58
Descriptions 1994-01-13 20 672