Language selection

Search

Patent 1173773 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1173773
(21) Application Number: 1173773
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR MODIFYING COAL TAR MATERIALS
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE MODIFICATION DU BRAI DE HOUILLE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract


PROCESS FOR MODIFYING COAL-TAR MATERIALS
ABSTRACT
The present invention relates to a process for de-
creasing and modifying the quinoline-insoluble content
(Q.I.) of coal-tar materials; and comprises extracting the
coal-tar material with a solvent, where the solvent contains
at least one of n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and the wash oil
fraction of coal-tar distillate. Pitches with a diminished
Q.I. content, lower viscosity and lower average Q.I.
particle size, may be prepared from coal-tar materials which
have been so treated.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
1. A process for decreasing the content of
quinoline-insolubles (Q.I.) in coal-tar material which
comprises: mixing said coal-tar material with a solvent
which contains at least one of n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and
the fraction of a coal-tar distillate which boils between
100 and 350°C; thereby to form a solvent-dissolved fraction
and a solvent-undissolved fraction, separating said
solvent-dissolved fraction from said solvent-undissolved
fraction of said coal-tar material, where said Q.I. is
concentrated in said solvent-undissolved fraction and said
solvent-dissolved fraction comprises coal-tar material with
a decreased Q.I.
2. Process as defined in Claim 1, comprising the ad-
ditional step of distilling said solvent-dissolved fraction
of said coal-tar material so as to obtain a pitch material,
where said pitch material has a lower Q.I. than pitch
material obtained by the distillation of said coal-tar
material.
3. Process as defined in Claim 2 wherein said distil-
lation additionally serves to separate said solvent from
said solvent-dissolved fraction.
4. Process as defined in Claim 3 wherein said sepa-
rated solvent is used in the extraction of additional coal
tar material.
5. Process as defined in Claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein
the ratio of said solvent to said coal-tar material ranges
from about 4:1 to about 1.4.
6. Process as defined in Claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein
said mixing and separation steps are carried out at a tem-
perature in the temperature range of 75 - 95 °C.
7. Process as defined in Claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein
said separation is carried out by filtration of said
- 11 -

mixture.
8. Process as defined in Claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein
said separation is carried out by centrifugation of said
mixture.
9. Process as defined in Claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein
said separation is a gravity separation.
10. A product derived from coal tar material by the
process defined in claims 1, 2 or 3.
- 12 -

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


3~73
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method of modi-
fying coal-tars. More particularly it relates to a method
of decreasing and/or modifying the quinoline insoluble
content therein.
Background of the Invention/Prior Art
Coal-tar is usually obtained as a by-product of
the distillation of coal in coke ovens, e.g. in the manu-
facture of metallurgical coke. It comprises a mixture of a
number of hydrocarbon compounds which can be separated by
distillation of the tar. Pitch, which is the residue in the
still following such a distillation is a viscuous material
which softens and flows when heated. Pitches are conven-
tionally classified according to their softening points and
their solubility in various solvents eg. quinoline, benzene
and dimethylformamide~ The latter characteristic is usually
indicated by the proportion of the pitch which is insoluble
in the solvent eg. the proportion of the pitch which is
quinoline-insoluble (Q.I.) is a widely-used pitch character-
istic.
Much of the Q.I. formation takes place at the hightemperature to which the tar is subjected during coke forma-
tion, and stays in the pitch residue following distilla-
tion. The presence of the Q.I. in the tar or pitch can be
tolerated for a limited number of applications; however, in
most of the uses, the presence of significant amounts of
Q.I. is viewed as an undesirable characteristic of the mate-
rial. The particulate nature of the Q.I. renders difficult
virtually any process which requires the passage of the
pitch through small orifices; eg. penetration of pitch is
rendered difficult. Additionally, should the Q.I. have a
high content of ash-forming impurities, the combustion rate
of the carbon body produced by coking (or otherwise
- 2 -

~ 73~73carbonizing~ the pitch will be significantly increased.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to
provide a process for decreasing and modifying the
quinoline-insoluble content in coal-tar material.
It is also an object of this invention to provide
a process for obtaining pitch material with a diminished
content of quinoline-insoluble materialO
Brief Description of the Invention
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a
process for decreasing and modifying the quinoline-insoluble
content (Q.I.) of coal-tar material comprising: mixing the
coal-tar material with a solvent which contains at least one
of n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and the fraction of a coal-tar
distillate which boils between 100 and 350C, thereby to
form a solvent-dissolved fraction and a solvent-undissolved
fraction of the coal-tar material, separating the two
fractions, where the Q~Io of the coal-tar material is
concentrated in the latter fraction; and the solvent-
dissolved fraction comprises coal-tar material with a
decreased and modified Q.I. Preferably, the process
comprises the additional step of recovering the solvent.
In another aspect, the present invention relates
to the production of pitch material by the distillation of
the aforesaid solvent-dissolved fraction where the pitch has
a reduced and modified Q.I.
Brief Description of the Drawings
: Figure 1 is a schematic flow diagram which
illustrates the steps which an embodiment of this invention
entails.
Figure 2 (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)) are scanning
electron microscope photographs of the insoluble particulate
matter in the tar and pitch respectively.
- 3

~'7~7~3
Detailed Description of the Invention
-
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a
process whereby the content of quinoline-insolubles (Q.I.)
in coal-tar material can be decreased. The coal-tar materi-
al which has been thus treated can be distilled in order to
obtain a pitch having a diminished Q.I. Additionally, the
Q.I. contained in the pitch so obtained will usually have a
size distribution different from a conventionally obtained
pitch having the same Q.I. This latter attribute of the
present invention is referred to as the "modification" of
the Q.I..The present invention additionally relates to a
novel coal tar pitch material having a significantly reduced
viscosity and a lower average particle size.
Broadly, the process of the present invention com-
prises a solvent extraction of coal-tar material in order to
separate the quinoline-soluble from the quinoline-insoluble
components; where the solvent chosen for this procedure con~
tains at least one of n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and the frac-
tion of the coal-tar distillate which boils between 100 and
350C, preferably between 200 and 350C~ In the following,
the latter solvent will be referred to as wash oil, a term
which is widely used in the art. The mixing of coal-tar ma-
terial with the solvent results in the formation of two
fractions which can be subsequently separated, viz. the
solvent-dissolved and that undissolved in the solvent, with
most of the Q.I. being localized in the latter fraction,
while the former fraction comprising the coal-tar material
has a greatly reduced Q.I. These fractions may be separated
by conventional techniques such as filtration, centrifuga-
tion, decantation and the like. The solvent-dissolved frac-
tion of the coal-tar material so treated can be distilled to
separate the various fractions with different boiling points
and obtain a pitch material with a significantly diminished
-- 4 --

73~3
Q.I. The pitch material, thus produced has a number of
characteristics and uses that are associated with a low
Q.I., a substantially reduced viscosity, and a relatively
low average size of particulate matter. The distillation,
which serves to separate the higher boiling components from
the pitch residue, also serves to separate the n-methyl-2-
pyrrolidone from the higher boiling components with which it
distils over. The n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone has a lower boil-
ing point than the light boilers contained in the distillate
and can be separated therefrom. The wash oil fraction of
the distillate can be permitted to distil over with the
n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and can equivalently (individually,
or in combination with the n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone) be used
as a solvent in this solvent extraction process. This will
permit some flexibility in the distillation procedure. The
n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and/or the wash oil fraction which
will be contained in the distillate can then be recycled ~or
use in the extraction of more coal-tar material.
The amount of solvent employed for this extraction
will be partiall~ determined by the viscosity of the resul-
tant coal-tar-solvent mixture required for the separation
technique (and which is also dependent upon the temperature
of this process) and by the amount required to dissolve sub-
stantially all th2 quinoline soluble material. Typically,
the proportion of the solvent in the mixture will usually
range ~rom about 20 to 80% of the mixture, ie. the solvent:
tar ratio will be in the range 1:4 to 4:1.
Turning now to the single figure (Figure 1), we
note that n~methyl-2-pyrrolidone which is introduced via
line 01, can be mixed with recycled solvent which can addi-
tionally contain some light boilers and is introduced to the
mixing tank 10, via line 02 where it is mixed with the
untreated tar which has been introduced to the tank via line
-- 5 --

~.~73773
04, at a temperature high enough to facilitate its handling
and further processing. The mixture then passes via ].ine 06
to the separation step 20 where the solvent-dissolved frac-
tion and the fraction insoluble in the solvent are sep~rat-
ed, possibly by differences in specific gravity or by
filtration, as a result of which the former fraction leaves
this step via line 08 and the latter fraction via line 07.
The former fraction which contains a tar with a depleted
Q.I. can be distilled in the distillation step 30 from which
the n-methyl 2-pyrrolidone and the light boilers come over
as the earlier fr~ctions of the distillate and can be
separated from each other, at separation step 40, if so
desired or recycled via lines 13 and 15 for use as a solvent
in the extraction of subsequent batches of coal-tar
material. The pitch residue obtained from this distillation
via line 09 will have a substantially reduced viscosity, a
lower average particle size of insolubles, in addition to a
reduced Q.I. content.
The advantages accruing to the user of this pro-
cess are many, not the least of which is the extent of the
Q.I. removal from the coal-tar which results from the use of
this process. Some of the other advantageous features of
this process stem from the solvent system used in this pro-
cess viz. the n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and/or the light boil-
ing cut of the tar distillate; in particular, the ease with
which the solvent can be used, recovered, reused; and the
facility with which these operations can be integrated into
a conventional pitch production process.
A surprising outcome of this process is the manner
in which the viscosity of the pitch and the size distribu~
tion of the Q.I~ is affected. The size distribution of a
pitch derived from an unextracted tar, or one extracted with
a solvent different from that of the present invention, is
-- 6 --

" ~73773
often characterized by a greater degree of particulate
agglomeration. The pitch material thus obtained is charac-
terized by a viscosity lower than that of pitches obtained
by the distillation of the untreated coal tar. This is
particularly important where the particulate size of the
pitch is important e.g. in applications such as the
impregnation of prebaked electrodes.
The following examples will serve to illustrate
the invention.
Example 1
This example illustrates how the Q.I. of a conven-
tional coal tar material can be decreased by the present
invention using the light boilers of coal tar distillation
(wash oil) as the solvent.
A sample of coal-tar having a Q.I. of 6.5~, and
representative of the output obtained from steel mills was
mixed with wash oil in a tar to wash oil ratio of 3:2. The
mixture was filtered using a Buchner funnel and No. 1
analytical filter paper with a moderate vacuum being applied
to accelerate the process. The Q.I. of the treated tar
was measured. The filtrate was then distilled under atmo-
spheric pressure, and the Q.I. content of the pitch residue
determined in accordance with ASTM D2318. The experimental
: recults are summarized in Table 1 below. The above proce-
dure was repeated with two other commercially available coal
tar samples having Q.I values of 7.0 and 23.7% respective-
ly. In each of the cases, the Q.I. in the treated tar was a
small fraction of that in the original sample.
A possibly more remarkable outcome which was in-
dicative of the degree to which the process resulted in theQ.I. removal was the low Q.I. content in the pitch residue
as compared to the original tar. This is surprising because
Q.I. is hormally concentrated in the pitch, partly due to a
-- 7 --

3~7~3
large decrease in the volume, and partly due to some crack-
ing which occurs during the distillation. Nonetheless, in
all the cases the Q.I. in the pitch was a small fraction of
that in the tar prior to filtration.
i The above procedure was repeated with the same
three tar samples, but with a tar:solvent ratio of 104. The
experimental results which are qualitatively substantially
the same as the preceding set; are also summarized in Table
1 below.
Table 1
_.~,. . .
, .,
,Q.I. (%)
'Coal Tar.Tar: Solvent'Untreated~ QoI~ (%) 'Q.I.(%)
Sample ' Ratio . Tar ' (Treated Tar) '(Pitch)
1 , 3:2 '6.5 . 0.02 , 0.3
2 J 3:2 '7.0 ' 0.5 . 1.0
1 3 ' 3:2 '23.7 0.7 ~.5
` ' 1 , 1:4 '6.5 ' 0.5 . 0.5
' 2 ' 104 .7.0 ' 0.03 ' O.S g
i 3 i 1:4 j23.7 ~ 0 3 i 3 0
Exam21e 2
This example illustrates the use of n-methyl-2-
pyrrolidone as the solvent in the extraction of the Q.I.
from the tar,
Tar samples identical to those in example 1 were
subjected to essentially the same procedure and tests as~
described above in the preceding Example. The results of
these experimental runs which are summarized in Table 2
below follow essentially the same pattern as in the preced
ing Example. The treated tar has a greatly reduced Q.I.
which is also manifested in the low Q.I. content of the
pitch residue remaining after the distillation of the tar.
-- 8 --

3~7i73
Table 2
,
Q.I. (%) l '
Coal Tar'Tar: Solvent'Untreated' Q.I. (%) 'Q.I.(%).
Sample ' Ratio ' Tar . (Treated Tar) '(Pitch)'
1 : 3:2 . 5.0 0.1 0.7
' 2 ' 3:2 ' 4.2 ' 0.1 . 3.4
. 3 , 3:2 '18.2 ' 0.3 . 4.5
,_ ., .. ._ , . ., . . , ~
1 , 1:4 , 5.0 0~2 , 1.3
2 ' 1:4 , 4.2 ' 0.1 ' 1.8
i 3 i 1:4 j18.2 , 0-03 i 5.1
. . . .
Example 3
This example presents a qualitative comparison of
particle sizes of insolubles in tar which has been extracted
using a conventional solvent (in this case quinoline), and
that which is residual in E~ after an extraction of the
precursor tar according to the present invention.
Figure 2(a) is a scanning electron microscope
(S.B.M.) photograph of residual tar Q.I. following an
extraction using quinoline. Figure 2(b) is a S.E.M. photo-
graph of the insolubles in a pitch prepared from an
identical tar after extraction with n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone.
It will readily moved that typical particle sizes
in the former photograph are greater than about 1 micron,
with sizes of the agglomerated particles ranging up to about
4 microns. The particle sizes in the latter photograph
~Fiyure 2(b)) range from less than about 0.~ microns to
about 0.5 micron, with the larger agglomerates being about 1
micron in size.
The difference in the particle size distribution
is all the more substantial when we note that the particles
in latter photograph include not only the insolubles follow-
ing the extraction of the tar, but additionally include the
"secondary" Q.I. produced during the tar distillation to
produce the pitch, where the original Q.I. is concentrated
and function as nuclei for the growth of Q.I. particles.
_ g _

~73~73
The above described procedure can be subjected to
a great variety of modifications which will be evident to
those skilled in the art and which fall within the scope of
the appended claims.
-- 10 --

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1173773 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2001-09-04
Grant by Issuance 1984-09-04

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
None
Past Owners on Record
HENRY A.F.L. KREMER
SAMUEL CUKIER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-03-21 2 152
Claims 1994-03-21 2 46
Abstract 1994-03-21 1 17
Descriptions 1994-03-21 9 334