Language selection

Search

Patent 1185337 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1185337
(21) Application Number: 1185337
(54) English Title: STABILIZATION OF ALUMINUM ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR FOIL
(54) French Title: STABILISATION DE LA FEUILLE D'ALUMINIUM D'UN CONDENSATEUR ELECTROLYTIQUE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C25D 11/24 (2006.01)
  • C25D 11/12 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BERNARD, WALTER J. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • SPRAGUE ELECTRIC COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • SPRAGUE ELECTRIC COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: HAROLD C. BAKERBAKER, HAROLD C.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1985-04-09
(22) Filed Date: 1984-08-09
Availability of licence: Yes
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
528,183 (United States of America) 1983-08-31

Abstracts

English Abstract


STABILIZATION OF ALUMINUM ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR FOIL
Abstract of the Disclosure
Aluminum electrolytic capacitor foil is stabi-
lized by passing the foil from an anodization step through
a bath containing an aqueous borate solution at a tempera-
ture of at least 80°C and a pH of 8.5 to 9.5. After stabi-
lization, the foil is reanodized.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 7 -
The embodiments of the invention in which an
exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as
follows:
1. A process for stabilizing anodized capacitor foil
comprising passing said foil from an anodization step
through a stabilizing bath containing a borate solution at
a temperature of at least 80°C and at a pH of 8.5 to 9.5
for from 2 to 8 minutes, and reanodizing, the cycle of
said stabilizing and reanodizing being performed at least
twice.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein there are
three of said cycles.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein said
temperature is 90 to 100°C
in said bath.
4. A process according to claim 1 wherein said
solution is a 0.001 to 0.05 M borax solution.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


33~
STABILIZATION ~F ALUMINUM ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR FOIL
This invention relates to the stabilizatlon of
aluminum capaci.tor foil for use in an electrolytic capaci-
tor.
It has been well-documented that aluminum capaci-
tor foil after apparently complete formation of a highvoltage dielectric oxide film evidences instability as
shown by a sudden loss of field strength. This behavior
is most markedly observed when the foil also bears a hy-
drous oxide layer that was formed prior to anodization.
There is general agreement in the electrolytic capacitor
industry that this dielectric instability is caused by the
creation of voids within the formed dielectric oxide layer.
It has been further postulated tha-t oxygen gas is trapped
within these voids and is liberated during the treatment
("depolarization") that brings about a relaxation in the
strength of the dielectric.
Whatever the actual physical mechanism which
may be involved, it is known to remedy the situation by
various so-called depolarizing techniques -- heating,
immersion in hot water with and without various additives,
mechanical flexing, pulsed currents, current reversal,
or a combination of these -- in short, methods which tend
to relax or crack the dielectric barrier layer oxide so
that these voids may be filled with additional dielectric
oxide and thereby impart permanent stability to the oxide
film.

3~
When the anodization electroly-te is of the boric
acid or boric acid/borate type, the resulting oxide film
is attacked by water to form a non-insulating hydrous oxide.
When the anodization electrolyte is of the hydration-inhi-
biting type, e.g., citrate or phosphate, the film is notso readily attacked. This degradation can occur by water
in rinse baths, by the working electrolyte in the final
capacitor, and even by exposure to air, particularly with
borate dielectric films, not just by immersion in hot water.
Thus, one of the prior art stabilization techni-
ques, immersion in hot water, acts to open up the barrier
layer dielectric oxide and expose or heal the voids and
also forms hydrous oxide and/or attacks the dielectric
film. It is desirable to direct the process so that it
will relax or open the dielectric oxide film to permit
stabilization without seriously damaging the dielectric
film.
Various additives have been used in the prior
art in the hot water immersion stage to inhibit formation
of hydrous oxide while permitting stabilization or to
strip excess hydrous oxide from the foil. These additives
have proved beneficial, but more improvement is needed.
In accordance with this invention anodized alu-
minum foil is passed through a bath containing a borate
solution at a temperature of at least 80C and a pH of
8.5 to 9.5. After stabilization, the foil is reanodized.
Aluminum electrolytic capacitor foil is stabi-
lized after anodization by passage through a bath contain-
ing an aqueous borate solution at a temperature of at
least 80C and a pH of 8.5 to 9.5 and then reanodized.
preferably, the bath con-tains 0.001-0.05 moles/liter of
borax, the temperature is 90-100C, and at least two
stabilization cycles are used with three being preferable.
Borax or boric acid at acidic pH controls the
hydration of aluminum foil in aqueous solutions. At pH
8.5-9.5, the borax is more effective than the reaction
with water in opening up the dielectric film. The solu-
tion may form hydrous oxide in the voids which is converted

~ 3
-- 3
to barrier layer oxide in a subsequent re-anodization step.
At this pH, the borax may attack the excess hydrous oxide
present with minimum damage to the barrier layer dielectric
oxide, presumably because of the mildly alkaline conditions.
Whatever happens, a stable dielectric oxide is formed after
reanodization, i.e., the foil displays lower leakage cur-
rents and little change in capacitance. This stability is
tested by immersing the foil in boiling water and measuring
electrical properties in comparison to foil which has not
been so stabilized.
Anodized foil, preferably intermediate to high
voltage foil (200-750V) is stabilized by passing the foil
into a bath containing 0.001-0.05 moles/liter of borax at
a pH of 8.5 to 9.5 and a temperature of 90-100C. The
temperature is chosen to give adeq-uate reactlon time with-
out being unduly long. The residence time in the borax
bath should not be less than two minutes or there is incom-
plete reaction. More than eight minutes is unnecessary as
there is no further benefit in longer times. The actual
time is within this range and depends upon the speed at
which foil transport has been set. The temperature should
be at least 80C as below that temperature the reaction is
too slow to be useful. The pH is critical as at this pH
stabilization occurs without excessive damage to barrier
layer oxide. At least two stabilization-reanodization
cycles are used, with three preferred for best results.
Depolarization of high voltage foil is more
effectively carried out when the medium employed is a hot,
slightly alkaline aqueous solution. However, the pH can-
not be permitted to exceed 9.5 because of the rapid anduncontrollable dissolution of the aluminum oxide film that
may occur under such conditions. For that reason, it is
not feasible to use solutions of sodium hydroxide, potas-
sium hydroxide or the strong bases. Ammonium hydroxide,
a common and inexpensive base, is also not suitable because
of its great volatility and the attendant difficulty in
maintaining a solution of well-controlled composition.

33~
There are a large number of materials, namely
buffered solutions of weak acids, that will perform ade-
quately and whose pH can be easily controlled. Care must
be taken, however, to employ only those which will not be
lnjurious to the electrolytic capacitor constructed from
the foil. It is likely that even after extensive and
careful washing of the foil after complete processi.ng that
trace amounts of the compounds from the bath will persist
in the minute pores and recesses of the etched foil, and
it is naturally desirable that the presence of these
residues be innocuous in regard to capacitor properties
and reliability.
Among the possible acceptable substances that
lend themselves to this application are buffered solutions
of boric acid, phenol, phthalic acid, acetic acid, citric
acid, tartaric acid, and carbonic acid (mixtures of sodium
bicarbonate and sodium carbonate). However, borax is pre-
ferred as it is easy to control the composition and pH of
borax solutions, and it is non-injurious to aluminum foil.
Its anion, borate ion, also is commonly present in anodi-
zing electrolytes and capacitor fill or working electroly-
tes. Therefore, the use of borax reduces the possibility
of anion interference or competing reactions.
Example 1
In the following chart, seven oxide quality deter-
minations were made on high voltage (about 350V) foil, with
"1" being the highest rating. Knee volts and end volts
refer to the voltage from the aging curve where there is
an inflection following a rapid voltage change (knee point)
and final (end)voltage where the curve plateaus out.
Measurements were made both before and after boiling for
five minutes in deionized water. A "boil-build" test was
also performed in which the foil was immersed in boiling
water, re-anodized, and checked for instability, e.g.,
increase in capacitance and loss in dielectric strength.
Except for the "boil-build" test, the tests were run
using a glycol-borate electrolyte. Sample A was anodized
in a phosphate electrolyte, received no borax treatment,

5~3~7
but was boiled and reanodized. Sample BBB was similarly
anodized and was treated and re-anodized three times using
a 0.02-0.03 M borax treating solution at about 92C.
Table 1
Sample A BBB
End volts 5 5 2
Knee volts 5.5 2.5
Time to knee 4 4
End volts (boiled) 7 2
Knee volts (boiled) 6 2
Time to knee (boiled) 5
Boil-build 3
Total 36 14.5
Thus, it can be seen that the borax treatment increases
foil stability dramatically.
Example 2
It has also been shown that dielectric oxide
films prepared in boric acid electrolytes may be similarly
stabilized. In the table below laboratory results are
shown for 1, 2, and 3 treatments. The foil is initially
boiled to form the hydrous oxide layer and anodized to
400V, treated in the borax solution and reanodized, and
treated and reanodized twice more. Sample 1 was treated
with boiling water for 3 minutes while sample 2 was treat-
ed with a O.OlM borax solution for 30 seconds af-ter gas
evolution ("depolarization") occurs. There was an induc-
tion period with the borax solution and this was an easy
way to measure reaction time. Capacitance (Cap) is in
microfarads, dissipation factor (DF) as a percent, and
reform time in seconds, and capacitance and % DF were
measured after each reformation.

~ 3
-- 6 --
Table 2
Reform
Cap % DF Time Cap % DF
Sample 1
initial 4.127 6.6 -- -- --
1st treat 21.6 46.4 228 3.755 8.1
2nd treat 13.2 36.0 60 3.795 8.6
3rd treat 6.25015.2 15 4.134 8.2
Sample 2
initial 4.128 6.6 -- -- --
1st treat 10.5 17.8 74 4.208 6.5
2nd treat 9.7 18.2 29 4.217 6.2
3rd treat 6.88513.3 23 4.227 6.0
Capacitance increase îs a measure of the instabi-
lity of the dielectric oxide. It can be readily seen that
even after one borax treatment, the film is more stable
than with boiling water alone. More than three treatment
steps can be used, but any addltional improvement is slight
so as to make additional stages unjustifiable.
The process will work with less than O.OOlM borax
solution but below this the concentration is difficult to
control, and in very dilute solutions (pH of about 8 or
less) the solution begins to act as a hydration inhibitor
rather than showing the desired stabilization action. More
than 0.05 moles/liter of borax (2% solution) is not needed,and there are indications that more concentrated solutions
attack the dielectric oxide.
The specified pH range corresponds to the desir-
able borax concentrations and is a convenient process con-
trol. The temperature is maintained at 90C at least toprovide a desirable reaction rate. Preferably, it is kept
below 100C to keep the solution from boiling over and
to reduce violent bubbling as the foil enters the solution.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1185337 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2011-07-26
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: First IPC derived 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2004-08-09
Inactive: Reversal of expired status 2002-04-10
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2002-04-09
Grant by Issuance 1985-04-09

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SPRAGUE ELECTRIC COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
WALTER J. BERNARD
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1993-11-15 1 8
Claims 1993-11-15 1 17
Cover Page 1993-11-15 1 15
Drawings 1993-11-15 1 12
Descriptions 1993-11-15 6 231