Language selection

Search

Patent 1193498 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1193498
(21) Application Number: 1193498
(54) English Title: SYNCHRONOUS VIBRATORY IMPACT HAMMER
(54) French Title: MARTEAU VIBRATOIRE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B06B 1/18 (2006.01)
  • B25D 11/06 (2006.01)
  • B25D 17/24 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BOUPLON, EDWARD J. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • ALLIED STEEL & TRACTOR PRODUCTS, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • ALLIED STEEL & TRACTOR PRODUCTS, INC.
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1985-09-17
(22) Filed Date: 1983-02-28
Availability of licence: Yes
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
353,628 (United States of America) 1982-03-01

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A vibratory impact hammer is disclosed having
no mechanical restraints which can absorb energy. The
hammer includes a hammer body assemblage suspended by
rubber mounts for reciprocal axial movement in a support
frame, the rubber mounts providing guiding and damping
action of the assemblage in either direction of axial
movement without extraneous friction forces acting
thereupon, and a pair of synchronously driven eccentric
weights which are arranged to provide vibratory move-
ment of the assemblage.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-7-
The embodiments of the invention in which an
exclusive property or privilege is claimed are
defined as follows:
1. A vibratory impact hammer including a
support frame, a hammer body assemblage suspended within
the support frame by resilient means arranged to provide
guiding and damping action in either direction of axial
movement of the hammer body assemblage, said hammer body
having a given stroke said resilient means being the sole
means engaging the hammer body assemblage so that extra-
neous frictional forces are avoided, vibration drive means
arranged to develop a forcing frequency to vibrate the
hammer body assemblage in an axial direction said forcing
frequency set to lead the vibrated frequency of the
hammer body assemblage by 135°, and a tool reciprocably
mounted in the support frame and positioned to receive
impact blows of the hammer body assemblage when recipro-
cated by the vibration drive means.
2. A vibratory impact hammer according to
claim 1, wherein said resilient means are rubber mounts.
3. A vibratory impact hammer according to
claim 2, wherein said rubber mounts are arranged in pairs,
one above the hammer body assemblage, the other below
the hammer body assemblage.
4. A vibratory impact hammer according to
claim 1, wherein said vibration drive means includes a
driving eccentric weight and a driven eccentric weight,
and a motor means arranged to rotate the weights in syn-
chronism.
5. A vibratory impact hammer according to
claim 4, wherein said eccentric weights are inter-
connected by a gear means.
6. A vibratory impact hammer according to
claim 1, wherein a tool holder is provided for the tool,
which tool holder includes means for removal of the tool
from the hammer.

-8-
7. A vibratory impact hammer according to
claim 1, wherein the stroke of the hammer body assemblage,
is equal to the in the air displacement of the hammer
body assemblage.
8. A vibratory impact hammer according to
claim 7, wherein the stroke of the hammer body assem-
blage is equal to < IMG >, wherein w = unbalanced weight,
v = radius where unbalance is located from the center
of rotation, and W = total weight vibrated.
9. A vibratory impact hammer according to
claim 8, wherein a hammer with a work impact output
of 200 ft.-lbs at 1200 rpm, would have a stroke of
0.4144 inches, and design parameters as follows:
W = 485.52 lbs.
w = 60.69 lbs.
r = 1.6576 inches
wr = 100.59 in lbs.
wr2 = 166.76 in2 lbs.
K = 3400 #/in.
spring rate

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


3~
1--
This invention relatec; to a synchrono~s vibra-
tory hammer employing a driving and a driven eccentric
weight arranged to produce vibratory action which may
be used for impacting a tool upon a work surface.
The art of vibratory hammers, of the type with
which this invention is concerned, is well developed
and many different designs have been proposed and
employed with varying degrees of success. Patent
3r866,693, dated February 18, 1975 to Bernard A. Century,
iO is representative of one such vibratory hammer.
The subject invention has certain elements in
common with the device of the Century patent, however,
it dif~ers in at least one important respect, namely,
it has no mechanical restraints which can absorb energy,
such as would be caused by the guides 186 and 188 of
Centuryls patent. The mechanical restraints in the
Century patent are used to control non-linear motion
of the hammer element being driven by a single eccentric.
The device o~ the subject invention eliminates the need
for such mechanical restraints because of the act that
two eccentrics are used.
The device of the subject invention requires
less maintenance than vibratory hammers having non-
linear impacting vihrations, which not only shake the
hammer supporting mechanism, but are subject to greater
wear and breakage.
A primary ohject of the invention is to provide
a vibratory hammer with improved operating efficiency,
and which minimize.s maintenance costs.
The presenl: invention provides a vibratory im-
pact hammer including a support frame, a hammer body
assemblage suspendecl within the support frame by
resilient means arl-anged to provide guiding and damping
action in either direction of axial movement o~ the
ha~mer body zssemblage, said hamm~r body having a given
'''',~''`'

-- 2
stro~e t the xesilient means being the sole means engaglng
the hammer body assemblage so that extraneous frictional
forces are avoided, vibration dri~e means arranged to de-
velop a forcing frequency to vibrate the hammer body as-
semblage in an axial direction, said forcing frequency setto lead the vibrated ~requency of the hamrner body assem-
blage by 135, and a tool reciprocably mounted in the sup-
port frame and positioned to receive impact blows of the
hammer body assemblage when reciprocated by the vibratory
drive means.
These and further objects and features of the
invention will become more apparent from an understanding
of the following disclosure.
In drawings which illustrate embodiments of the
invention,
Fig. 1 is a side elevation view of a vibratory
hammer embodying the principles of the in~ention;
Fig. 2 is an enlarged section view as seen from
line 2-2 in Fig. l;
Figs. 3, 4 and 5 are cross section views as seen
from lines 3-3, 4-4 and 5-5 respectively in Fig. 2;
Fig. 6 is an exterior view of a hammer body com-
ponent used in the device of Fig. l;
Fig. 7 is an end view of the eccentric weights
mounted on a shaft.
Referring now to Figs. 1 to 5, numeral 1 identi-
fies a vibratory hammer having a support frame consisting
of a pair of side plates 3, which are maintained in par-
allel position by means of tubular space bars 5, welded to
the plates~ as well as a tool holder element 7, similarly
welded thexeto. A hammer body assemblage 9, as shown in
Fig. 6, is suspended between the side plates 3 by resilient
means consisting of four rubber mounts 11 affixed to thc
side plates and the hammex body assemblage by means of
bolts 13 and 15~ As will be apparent, the mounts serve as

- 2a -
the sole guiding and damping mea~ns for the assemblage
when the latter is vibrated duri.ng t~l operation.
"~,

~3~
The hammer body assemblage 9 includes an
eccentric weight chamber 17, shown in Fig. 7~ enclosing
a pair of eccentric weights 19 and-21, mounted upon
shafts 23 supported in roller bearings 25 positioned
in end caps 27 r the latter being secured by bolt means
29 to side members 31 of -the eccentric weight chamber
15 by bolts 32~ Projecting from the top surface of
the eccentric weight chamber 17 and affixed theretol
is an upper axm member 33 adapted to be affixed to the
rubber mounts 11 by the bo]ts 15.
Projecting from the bottom surface of the eccen-
tric weight chamber 7 and aEfixed khereto, is a lower
arm member 35 adapted to be affixed to the rubber mounts
11 by the bolts 15. Brace members 37 are secured to
the sides of the lower arm member 35 and the hammer
body assem~lage 9, to stabilize the arm member. An
hydraulic motor 39, affixed to the end of shaft 23, is
provided to rotate the eccentric weight 19. A pair
of gears 41, mounted upon the shaft 23, ~s arranged to
transmit rotary motion from the shaft which supports
eccentric weight 19, to the sha~t which supports eccen-
tric weight 21, so that both weights are rotated at the
same speed but in opposite directions. Hose means 43
5uppiy pressurized hydraulic fluid to the motor 39
when desired, from a power source, not shown.
At the lower extremity of the arm member 35 is
a striker plake 45 affixed thereto by means of pin 47.
The striker plate is arranged to impact upon a conical
tool 49 mounted in the tool holder element 7 as best
seen in Fig~ 2~ Retaining means, including a key 51
projecting into a slot 53 formed in the tool 49, allow
reciprocal movement of the tool~ The tool slides in
bushi.ngs 55 supported in a bushin~ housing 5?, the
latter positionally maintained against axial movement
hy a tool stop plate 59,affixed to the end of the tool

~3~
holder by means of cap screws 61~
Support means for the vibratory hammer 1, are
provided by a pivotally attached linkage assemblage 63,
which may be operatively positioned by power machinery,
e.g. tractor, not shown.
The desi.gn parameters of a vibratory hammer
built in acco.rdance with the invention disclosed herein,
obviously will vary in accordance with the work impact
output desired.
It is to be recognized -that when a forcing
frequency vibrates a mass at its natural frequency, the
mass of the forcing frequency generator leads the
vibrated mass by 90. When the forcing frequency is
much higher than the natural frequency, the forcing
frequency mass could lead the vibrated mass by 180.
Accordingly, if the leading phase is 135, the vertical
componen-t of centrifugal force of the vibrated mass,
coupled with the stored energy of the rubber mounts,
will produce maximum impacting on the tool 49.
The optimum phase angle of 135 l~) is deter-
mined by the following equation:
2 ~
tan ~ = fn
1 f2
fn
where ~ - phase anqle
~ = damping factor
f = forcing frequency CPM,RAD/SEC
fn = natural frequency

~3~
It can be demonstrated by plottiny frequency
ratio vs. ~ wi.th varying damping factors, that any-
thing less than a critically damped system gives phase
angles of a~proximately 180 at any frequency ratio
greater than 1, hence, critical damping of the system
is essential for optimum operative results. Critical
damping by definition means no over oscillation when
a mass is deflected from its static position and re-
turned to the same static position. Critical damping
is achieved by a preload, in the present vibratory
hammer, by use of the rubber mounts ll.
It is essential, for optimum operation, that
the stroke of the hammer be equal to the -in the air
displacement (S ), which is provided by the following
equation:
S = 2 wr
W
Where w - unbalanced weight
r = radius where unbalanced weight is
located from the center of
rotation
W = total weight vibrated
By application of these formula, a vibratory
hammer in accorclance with the invention will have the
followirlg numeral values, if a work impact output of
200 ft.-lbs. at 1200 rpm is to be achieved:
Stroke 0.4144 inches
Weiyht of hammer body assemblage (9) 485.52 lbs.
w = 60.69 lbs.
r = 1.6576 inches
wr2 - 100.59 in lbs.
wr - 166.76 in2 lbs.
K - 3gO0 #/in.
,. ., ~

--6--
While an embodimenk of the invention has been
illustrated and described in detail to enable any
person skilled in the art, to which it pertains, to
make and use the same, it is expressly understood that
the invention is not limited thereto~ Various changes
in form, design, or arrangement may be made in its
parts without departing from the spirit and scope of
the invention; it is my intention, therefore, to claim
the invention/ not only as shown and described, but
also in all such forms and modifications thereof as
might be reasonably construed to be within the spirit
of the invent.ion and the scope of the appended claims.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1193498 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2003-02-28
Inactive: Reversal of expired status 2002-09-18
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2002-09-17
Grant by Issuance 1985-09-17

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ALLIED STEEL & TRACTOR PRODUCTS, INC.
Past Owners on Record
EDWARD J. BOUPLON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1993-06-16 1 18
Claims 1993-06-16 2 69
Drawings 1993-06-16 4 141
Abstract 1993-06-16 1 15
Descriptions 1993-06-16 7 223