Language selection

Search

Patent 1197408 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1197408
(21) Application Number: 1197408
(54) English Title: LITHOGRAPHIC SUBSTRATE AND ITS PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE
(54) French Title: SUBSTRAT LITHOGRAPHIQUE, ET SA PREPARATION
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G03F 7/004 (2006.01)
  • B41C 1/10 (2006.01)
  • G03F 7/021 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CADWELL, DONALD E. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1985-12-03
(22) Filed Date: 1982-09-15
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


LITHOGRAPHIC SUBSTRATE AND ITS PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE
ABSTRACT
Lithographic printing substrates ordinarily
require a mechanical or chemical graining of aluminum
surfaces. Such substrates are difficult and expensive
to make. It has been found that a lithographically suit-
able substrate on an aluminum surface can be provided by
the firing of at least one monobasic phosphate solution on
substrates having an aluminum surface.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for coating an aluminum or aluminized substrate wherein a
layer comprising at least one monobasic phosphate is applied on at least one alu-
minum surface of the aluminum or aluminized substrate and the monobasic phosphate
is then fired at a temperature of at least 230°C to form a ceramic coating having
a thickness of between 0.2 and 15 micrometers on said aluminum wherein said at
least one surface of said aluminum or aluminized surface has a microscopic, litho-
graphically useful texture in the aluminum and wherein said ceramic coating is
etched after firing.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said monobasic phosphate is monoaluminum
phosphate.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein firing is at a temperature of at least
260°C to form a dehydrated coating.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein firing is at a temperature of at least
280°C to form a dehydrated coating.
5. The process of claim 3 wherein said ceramic coating is a polymorphic
form of aluminum phosphate or mixtures of aluminum phosphate.
6. The process of claim 5 wherein said ceramic coating has a thickness of
between 0.5 and 5 micrometers.
7. An article comprising an aluminum or aluminized substrate bearing on at
least one aluminum or aluminized surface thereof a fired ceramic coating compris-
ing a polymeric form of aluminum phosphate or mixtures of aluminum phosphates,
said coating being substantially free of particulate material, wherein a photo-
sensitive layer is coated on said ceramic layer.
12

8. The article of claim 7 wherein said aluminum or aluminized substrate
has a lithographically useful microscopic texture on said at least one surface
bearing the ceramic coating.
9. The article of claim 8 wherein the ceramic coating has been etched in
an alkaline solution, rinsed and dried.
10. The article of claim 7 wherein said coating is between 0.2 and 15
micrometers and said aluminum is in the form of a film or sheet.
11. The article of claim 7 wherein said coating is between 0.5 and 5 micro-
meters.
12. The article of claim 7, 8 or 9 wherein a photosensitive layer compris-
ing organic polymerizable composition is coated on said ceramic layer.
13. The article of claim 10 or 11 wherein a photosensitive layer comprising
organic polymerizable composition is coated on said ceramic layer.
14. The article of claim 7, 8 or 9 wherein a photosensitive layer compris-
ing an oligomeric diazonium resin is coated on said ceramic layer.
15. The article of claim 10 or 11 wherein a photosensitive layer comprising
an oligomeric diazonium resin is coated on said ceramic layer.
13

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-1- 557-2567
LITIIOG PIIIC SUBSTRATE AND ITS PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE
BACKGR0UND OF T~IE IN~ENTION
Lithographic printing plates have been widely used for many years.
One of -the basic concepts utilized in that technology is the establishment of
differential wettability between areas on the planographic printing surface.
This is most usually effected by providing a substrate having a hydrophilic or
water wettable surface and coating that surface with an imageable and develop-
able (usually light or radiation sensitive) grease sensitive (oleophilic) and
hydrophobic layer. After imaging and developing of this layer, the printing
~o plate variously exposes hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. When the plate
is then wet with water and then coated with grease or oil-based printing inks,
only the hydrophobic areas o:E the image will hold the ink and provide a dark
image when pressed against a receiving surface such as paper.
This lithographic process has been able to provide planographic print-
ing plates which are capable of producing as few as hundreds of copies or as
many as several hundred thousand high quality copies. The desirability of
being able to produce large numbers of copies from a single plate are quite
apparent. Only a single imaging and developing procedure must be performed,
and ~he printing press need not be shut down during operation in order to change
2n plates.
The investigation of means for lengthening the running time of plano-
graphic printing plates has been the focus of many studies and research. It is
also necessary in the provision of more durable plates to nlaintain or improve
such other desirable or essential characteristics of printing plates such as
imaging speed, ease of development, non-polluting chemistry, and shelf life.
Most of the research in providing longer running and ~igher durability plano-
graphic printing plates has centered on the imageable and hydrophobic coa~ing
layer on
X ~7k
3160~ CANlA ~-

~t7~
--2--
the hydrophiLic surface of the substrate. As it is
usually the breakdown o~ this layer which causes failure
o~ the printing plate, the loyic oE that directiorl of
research is ap~arant.
S In general, the subs~rate provided for the
imayeable layer is an alurninum sheet which has been
prepared Eor coating by a variety of cleanin~, rnechanical,
and chemical treatments. For example, an aluminum surface
is usually cleaned to remove oils and other contaminants
~his cleaning is then followed by a rnechanical or electro-
chemical graining process, and finally an anodi~ ny
~rocess.
For example~ U.S~ Patent No. 3,963,59~ discloses
the electrochemical etching of an alurninum substrate ~ith
an aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid and gluconic
acid. This provides a uni~or~nly coarse surface texture to
the aluminu~ substrate. The process of ~hat ~a~ent
~rlnits the use oE lower ~ur~nt densiti~s that were ~oun
to be necessary when using only hydrochloric acid in the
bath. rrhe treatment also complexed dissolved aluminum ancl
other impurities which form in the etching bathO Thix
extended the life of the bath. Desmutting treatlnents were
also shown in combination with tlle electrochemical
etching.
British Paten~ No. 1,439,127 discloses an
anodi~.ing treatment ~or aiuminum substrates in which the
~nodization is performed in an aqueous sulfuric acid bath
~t a tem~erature in excess oE 70C and with an anodi~ing
current density of at least 50 amps/sq. t. This treat-
ment redu~es the length of time in which the anodizing
step is per~orln~d. Other etching solution comi~ositions
and electrical paralneters are dis~losed in U~SO Pa-tents
Nos. 4,072,5~9 and ~,052,275 and French Patent No.
2,322,015.
U.S. Patent ~lo. 3,030,210 and French Patent l~o.
~,025,S50 discloses lithographic plate substrates prepared
by immersion in phosphate-con-taining solutions, rinsing,

7~3
. -3-
and drying. I`he phosphate-containing layer produced by such a metho~ is com-
paratively thin7 soft and hydrated and does not have the intrinsic wear-
resisting properties conferred by firing a ceramic coating a-t elevated tempera-
tures.
After electrochemical or mechanical etching o:f the aluminum surEace,
an anodically oxidizing treatment is usually pe-rformed to render the aluminum
surface both corrosion resistant and wear resistant. This is shown in British
Patent 17~39,127 discussed above and in U.S. Patent No. 4,131,518. In this
la~ter patent, aluminum -Eoil in the form of a continuous web, particularly when
the aluminum carries a polymeric coating on one side thereo~, is anodizin~ so
that energy requirements are reduced and anodizing speeds are increased.
U.S. Patent No. 3,181,461 discloses an anodizing process in which the
sulfuric acid anodi~ing step is followed by treatment with an aqueous solution
of sodium silicate. This treatment seals the pores of the anodic oxide and pro-
vides a hydrophilic, ink~repelling surface ]ayer.
The practice of treating lithographic substrates of aluminum in order
to increase surface areas and enable anodic coatings is well described in the
art such as U.S. Patents ~os. 3,935,080; 3,9~9,591; 3,9807539; and 3,9887217.
Even though anodizing has bacome ~he most common Tneans of providing
an aluminum substrate for durable planographic printing plates7 and even though
some reduction of energy requirements has been made7 the process still requires
large amounts of electrical energy in its operation and also generates efflu-
ents that must be care*ully disposed of to avoid environmental pollution.
A novel method for providing textured surfaces on lithographic print-
ing plate substrates of aluminum was disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,210,18~. A
layer of boehmite (aluminum oxide monohydratè) was produced on the aluminum sub-
strate by bathin~ the aluminum in hot water or steam in the presence of a weak
J~

'7~
organic base. Printing plates using this textured su~strate wer~ shown to pro-
vide increased numbers of copies under comparable condit:ions as compared to
printing plates using mechanically roughened aluminum substrates.
German Patent (Ofenlegungsschrift) 24 3~ 098 discusses -firing a com-
position of aluminum phosphate and silicon carbide particles onto a metal sur-
face of the purpose of increasi.ng i-ts wear resistance. However, the invention
of German Patent 2~ 34 098 is not suitable for use on lithographic plates and
is not performed on aluminum surfaces.
U.S. Patent Nos. 3,871,881 and 3,975,1~7 disclose another method of
enhancing the physical properties o aluminum surfaces. Various types of part-
iculate material are bonded to the surface of the aluminum by an in situ formed
binder of aluminum hydroxyoxide. The enhanced aluminum article is suggested
for use as a substrate for printing plates.
It is disclosed in the description of the present invention that a
novel process for treating lithographic quality aluminum foil can provide a
durable, long-running substrate for lithographic plate constructions. This pro-
cess provides a novel substrate which can be resistant to the chemical action
of printing plate developers and press solvents. The novel substrate also en-
ables the bonding of many photoreactive imaging layers to the treated aluminum
substrate without the need for primers or other adhesion promoting agents.
SU~ARY OF T~IE INVENTION
A process is disclosed for firing a solution of at least one mono-
basic phosphate, preferably monoaluminum phosphate, on a alumi.num substrate or
aluminized surface of a substrate. This process produces an aluminum sheet
bearing a layer o glass or polymorphic forms of aluminum

~i7~
phosphate or mixtures oE aluminum phosphates on at least one surface thereof.
This coated layer has been found to provide an excellent surface Eor adhesion of
organic materials. In particular, -the a].uminum phosphate layer provides excell-
ent adhesion for diazonium resins and photopolymeric compositions used in the
printing art and particularly in the planographic printing artr
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a
process for coa-ting an aluminum or aluminized substra-te wherein a layer compris-
ing at least one monobasic phosphate is applied on at least one aluminum surface
of the aluminum or aluminized substrate and the monobasic phosphate is then fired
at a temperature of at least 230C to form a ceramic coating having a thickness
oE between 0.2 and 15 micrometers on said aluminum wherein said at least one sur-
face of said aluminum or aluminized surface has a microscopic, lithographically
useful texture in the aluminum and wherein said ceramic coating is etched aEter
firing.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided
an article comprising an aluminum or aluminized substrate bearing on at least one
alumi.num or aluminized surface thereof a fired ceramic coating comprising a poly-
meric form of aluminum phosphate or mixtures of aluminum phospha-tes, said coating
being substantially free of particulate material, wherein a pho-tosensitive layer
is coated on said ceramic layer.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The process of forming aluminum phosphate coatings on substrates accor-
ding to -the present invention provides a number of improvements over prior ar-t
processes for producing substrates for pho-toimaging elemen-ts, particularly in -the
continuous manufacture of substrates. No-t only does the coa-ted substra-te of the
present invention have equivalent or improved properties as compared -to materials
of the prior art, b~t also provides significant economic advantages in i-ts manu-
--5--

facture. Apparatus used in the process consists of fewer separate items of equip-
ment, thus requiring a lower capital investment than conven-tional forms of con-
tinuous substrate formation. The significant equipment eliminated includes the
anodizing facili-ty which is itself costly to operate because of high energy re-
quirements and the need for safe effluen-t disposal. Such equipment is desirably
eliminated from a substrate manufacturing line because of associa-ted electrochem-
ical corrosion problems of other equipment on the same produc-tion line.
A coating of a monobasie phosphate solution is applied to a clean a]um-
inum or aluminized surface. Suitable monobasic phosphates include -monoaluminum
phosphate and alkaline earth acid phosphates such as monomagnesium phosphate,
monocalcium phosphate, and mix-tures thereof. This coating is fired at a tempera-
ture of at least 450F (230C), preferably at least 500 or 550F (260 or 290C),
to produee a ceramic coating of a glass or polymorphie form of aluminum phosphate
or mixture of aluminum phosphates. The eeramie surface may be etched to provide
desired
-5a-

7~0~
~5--
texture to the surace. This e-tciling is ~nost conveniently
perforlned for substrates to be used ln liti~o~rapl~ic plates
at the same ti~ne in which silica~in(3 of th~ substrate is
bein~ eefected~ ThiS can be accomplished by using known
alkaline silicate solutions which will etch and deposit a
silicate coating at the salne timeO Where no si:Licatiny is
re~uired or where ~he subsequently applied light sensitive
composition would not be compatible Wit}l a silicate
surface, the etch Inay be performed in al]caline phosphate or
alu~ninate solu~ions, for example. The aluminuln or
alu,ninized substrate shoul~ initially have a texturized
surface so tllat etching of the ceramic coating will restore
the relief provided by the underlying ~exture under ~he
cera,nic coating and provide additional lnicroscopic texture.
This texture from bo~h sources, which is a rnicrQscOpiC
texturing visible by light scattering or under
magniEication, provides a physical structure to ~hich
su~equ~ tly applied ligll~ s,ensitive coatiny com~ositions
may adhere. ~ny o~ the available known proce~ses Eor
~rovi~1inc~ texture to ~he substrate Inay be used, but i~ is
preferred to use rnechanical graining such as slurry brush
yraining.
The post-firing etch Inay remove whatever amount
of the dehydrated ceramic coatin~ is necessary to ~rovide
~he character required in the texture oE the substrate.
As little as five percent and as much as sixty percen~ b~
weight or more of the ceramic coating may have to be
relnoved, but generally ~etween fi~teen and Eifty perce~nt
of the coating is removed, and preerably between twenty-
f ive and Eorty percent is rernoved. The length of tlme of
tlle etch is regulate~ by the temperature ancl p~ of t~le
etchinc3 ~nvironment. Higher temperatures and higher p~l
levels provide ~aster etches. The pH may be controlled ~y
the addition of alkaline llydroxides such as sodium or
potassium hydroxide. ~eplenishing solutions may be added
~urin(~ tile ~ontinuous processing operation ~o replacc? dny
naterial~ such as the alkali component, which i5 depletecl

_~ -7
clurillg the etch. The combined etch and silicatin.~ solu-
tions are generally optimized to emphasi~e the silicatiny
treatment since the silica~e etch has a wider ~erformance
latitude than phosphate or aluminate etchin~ solutions.
The silica~es used for the combined etching and silicating
baths are preferably at the high silica content ent3 of the
sommercially available materials. Such materials as
asi ~ 1", or "S-35~ of the Philadelphia Quartz Co~, or
mixtures of "S-35~ wi-th a fine silica sol (e.y., 'INalcoag
#1115" of l~alco Chemical Co.) are particularly useEul when
diluted ~ith water to give solutions having approxirnately
one percent silica on a dry weight basisO
The texturized substrates produced by the
etchiny of the ceramic coated aluminum or aluminized
substrate may then be coated with a light sensitive
composition. A~ oligomeric diazoni~n resin and/or an
or~anic negative acting pho~osensitive composition may be
desirably applied to the texture~ surface4
The surface p~ovided on the alumin~m substrate
~0 is highly water receptive and has been shown to be at
least as hydrophilic as anodized aluminum. The sur~ce
provides excellent adhesion for polymeric and oligomeric
compositions. The sur~ace has been found to provide
excellent adhesion Eor positive acting photosensi tive
~5 compositions such as those containing diazo oxides and
dia~o sulfides.
The -thickness of tlle ceramic coating can readily
be varied as desired, for example, between 0.2 and 15
mi.crolneters. Pre~erably, for use as a sub~trate for ~lano-
graphic printing plates, the coating layer is between 0~3
al~d 10 microme~ers and more preEerabl~ is between 0.5 and
5 Inicrolneters.
The firing temperatures used in the practice of
the present invention must be higher than 450 or 500F
(230 or 260C) and preferably are at least 5$0~'F (285~)~
Temperatures higher than 700F (370C) do not o~fer any
significant advantages and tend to raise the energy
~ ~rA~

` --8-
requirements of the process. The firing should be performed for a long enough
period of time at these temperatures -to insure substantially complete dehydra-
tion of the dried coating. This may take place in as little as -fifteen seconds
dwell time at the described ~emperatures depending upon the thickness of the
coating and the temperature and other parameters of the firing process. These
temperatures refer to the sur-face temperature of the coating as measured by con-
tacting that surface with the bare junction o-f a thermocouple. The surface tem-
perature may vary quite markedly from the control temperature of various ovens
and so this type of measurement is desirable.
Particulate matter such as magnesium oxide, silica, alumina, chromia,
and ferric oxide may be added to the monobasic phosphata solution with conse-
quent benefits. The addition of some of these ma-terials, such as magnesium
oxide and alumina in particular, provide increased resistance to attack from
basic developers and provide additional qualities to the graininess of the coat-
ing layer. The improvement is the subject matter of assignee's copending
Canadian Patent Application S.N. 411458, filed September 15, 1982 in the name
of L. A. Brey and D. ~. Cadwell~ Flocculation inhibitors such as gluconic acid
may also be added to the slurry, but alkaline dispersants such as alkali phos-
phates are not preferred even though they do not destroy the function of the
presen-t invention.
The process can be readily performed in a continuous manner and has
been Eound to provide satisfactory results when performed in this fashion on a
web.
Lithographically useful composition may~ of course, be coated on the
coated surface. Such compositions would comprise 1) oligomeric diazonium
resins, 2) positive acting diazo oxides or esters, 3) photopolymerizable
organic compositions (particularly such as ethylenically unsaturated materials
in the presence of free radical photoinitiators)~ 4) oligomeric diazonium
X

resin undercoats wih photopolyinerizable oryanic co~posi-
tion overcoats, and 5) any otiler various well known
litho~3raphically useful photosensitive co~positions.
These and other aspects of the present invention
will become apparent from the following examples.
Exam~
A precleaned, ungrained aluminum foil was coated
with a solution of 25 weight percent monoal~ninum
pho.sphate in water and dried above 100C to a coating
thickness of about 3 ~nicro,neter.s. The surface tem~erature
of the coating ~as raised to 550F (260C~ in ninety
seconds in an oven and removed after thirty seconds at
thdt temperature. A positive actiny photosensitive
composition as described in Example 3 of U.S. Patent
4,247,616 was coa~ed on~o the treated surface after
rinsin~ and drying. The composition adhered well to the
~ub.~trate and develo~ed of f cleanly after expoSur~-.
~J~ _ 2
A precleaned~ ungrained aluminum foil was coatecl
~ith a composition comprisin~, b~ weight, 12% alumina
(nominally 0.5 micrometers diameter), 15% monoaluMinum
phosphate, 0.75~ mag~esium oxide ~particle size less than
~5 200 mesh), and 72025~ water. The coating was dried to a
thickness o~ about 3 Tnicro,neters.
The coated fil-ln was placed in an oven and the
surEace temperature of the coating was raise-~ to 550F
(260~C) in thirt~ seconds. Dwell time in the oven was one
and one half minutes. The coated film was cooled, rinsed,
and dried, then rolled u~.
The foil was subse~uently unrolled and coated
with the ~ositive acting photosensitive com~osition of the
previous example. The photosensitive layer adhered well to
the substrate and developed off c-leanly with no undesirable
undercuttin~ of the half tone image.

~7~
--10--
Example 3
The procedure of Example 2 was repeate-~ except
that 1% zillc oxide was used in place of the magnesium oxide
and corre~pondingly less water was used. The coated
aluminu,n was found to be somewhat less resistant to
developer chemicals than the sheek of Example 2, but still
provided excellent adherence to the photosensitive layer
and provided a ~aseful printi~g plake surface.
Example 4
The procedure of Example 2 was repeated, using
the ~ame coating cornposition, but with firing èf~ected at
600F (310C). No differences were observed between the
mechanical or chemical pro~erties o~ the materidls. Both
were presumed to be fully dehydrated.
Example 5
An aluminum foil similar to that of the previous
examples except roughened by a rotary brush Eed with an
abrasive slurry such as pumice, to give a mechenically
a~ra~ed, lithogra~hically use~ul surfa~e texture ~s is
well-known in the art, was coated with a solution of 25
weight percent monoaluminwn phosphate in water, (~ried one
Ininute in still air and 300F, a second minute at 300F in
moving air, and ~ired for one ~ninute during which the
surEace temperature rose to 550F. The coated film was
then immersed 90 seconds in a solukion containing 4O8~ by
weight of "Kasil #l" brand potassium sili~ate solution
(Philadelphia Quartz Co.~, .03~ potassium hydroxide, and
the ~alance water, at ~5Cq The silicate treated Eoil was
rill~cd in a .~pr~y o~ deioni~.ed w~ter [o~ 30 seconds,
dried, and coated with a 12 Inicron nega-tive acting photo-
~olymeric colnposikion having acrylate monQmers and a
photo~ensitizer. Upon ~eing mounted side by-side as a
hal~ plate, the other half being a factory~inade plate oE
thc same photopolymer com~o.sition on standard an3dized
aluminuln, and run ~or thousands of impressions, the

aluminum phosphate coated plate gave at least as many good
impressions beEore showing wear, as the :Eactory-made
anodized plate.
Exalnple 6
A grained aluminum foil prepared, phosphate
coated and fired as .in Example 5, and similarly etched
except in a 5.25 weight percent solution of Philadelphia
Quartz S-35 sodium silicate in water, coated with the same
imageable layer and tested similarlyr also equalled the
performance of the commercial anodized plate.
Example 7
A grained aluminum foil prepared, phosphate
coated and ired as in Example 5, and similarly etched
exce~t in a p~ 10.4 solution of sodium pyrophosphate at
70C, was coated with a positive-working photopolyllleric
c~ln~osition, and tested silnilarly a~ainst a ~actor~made~
pla~e. It gave several times as many copies before
showing wear as the Tartan 25 plate, which i.5 ~rush
~3rained similarly to the experimental plate but is not
hard coated or anodi2ed.
A grained aluminum foil prepared, phosphate
coated and fired as above, was etched as above except in a
~H 10.4 solution of "~alco 68 ~ sodiwn aluminate, mad~ by
the Nalco Chelnical Co~ ancl te.sted simi.l.arly. It yav~
several tilnes as many copies before showing wear as t~le
ac tory-made plate .
t ~'J~ P-~

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1197408 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-09-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-08-01
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-08-01
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2013-08-01
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2002-12-03
Inactive: IPC removed 1989-12-31
Grant by Issuance 1985-12-03

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
DONALD E. CADWELL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1993-07-15 1 13
Cover Page 1993-07-15 1 18
Claims 1993-07-15 2 59
Drawings 1993-07-15 1 9
Descriptions 1993-07-15 12 502