Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
BACKGROUND OF ~HE INVF'NTION
~_
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to alrcraft control
systems and more par-ticularly to a system for the achievement and
maintenance of a desired cruise airspeed ~or the aircraft by a
coordinated control and operation of the aircraft's engine
throttles and its pitch attitude.
2. Descrlption of the Prior Art
The problem of achieving and maintaining a cruise speed which
results in mini~izing the ~uel consumption on modern jet aircraft
is well known and is discussed further in Applicant's assignee's
E.P~O. Application No. 82,306~55.0 entitled "Cruise Speed Control
for Aircraft Pbrformance Management System" published on June 29
1983. As discussed therein, the basic difficulty is that the
optimal cruise speed typically lies in a region of almost neutral
speed stability; that is, large deviations in desired Mach number
can occur at virtually constant engine thrust or engine pressure
ratio (EPR) settings, and conversely, very small chanyes in en~ine
thrust or EPR may result in very large Mach nunber changes.
Many prior art automatic throttle control systems used only a
signal proportional to the difference bè~ween the desired optimal
Mach number speed and the actual Mach number speed to alter the
thrust setting of the en~ine(s). ~oweverS because of the netural
speed stability phenomenon, such systems exhibited oscillatory
speed and throttle control characteristics that adversely affec-ted
fuel consumption and engine life and at the same time were
objectionable to passengers and crew.
3 ~t b 3 t.J~
1 There have been recen-t attempts in the prior art to
overcome the vir-tual neutral speed stability problem at
aircraft cruise speeds. In one attempt, the algebraic sum
of Mach speed error, that is, the difference between the
commanded Mach number speed and the actual Mach number speed,
the integral of Mach error, and the rate of change of actual
Mach number was used to drive the aircraft's autothrottle
system to adjust the thrust or EPR of the engines. In
addition, a signal based orl actual Mach rate, or alternatively,
washed out actual Mach number was supplied to the pitch
channel of the aircraft's autopilot where it was summed with
the altitude hold signal when the autopilot was operating in
its altitude hold mode in an attempt to reduce any detected
Mach rate to zero. A turbulence detector was also used to
override both the throttle control signal and the pitch cross
control signal when the aircraft experienced unsteady
atmospheric disturbances. While some success may have been
achieved with this system, it had at least three basic short-
comings. In the first instance, the reduction of Mach rate
20~ to zero through the pitch autopilot does not ensure that Mach
error is reduced to zero as is desired, it only ensures that
the aircraft is not accelerating or decelerating. Thus,
significant Mach errors due to relatively rapid atmospheric
changes can be maintained until the autothrottles can adjust
the EPR to correct for the error. In the second instance,
there exists no dynamic separation between the pitch autopilot
commands and the autothrottle commands. Any dynamic changes
in actual Mach number due to pitching the aircraft to reduce
the Mach rate signal to zero are directly reflected into the
autothrottle system, resulting in unnecessary and undesirable
throttle activity~ In the third instance, ~he prior art example
has no provision for the timely acquisition of the desired Mach
number should the autothrottle system be e~gaged at a speed
significantly different from the desired speed~
Another prior art approach to the solution of the neutral
speed stability problem is described in the above-referenced
E~P.O. Application Nb. 82.306~S5~0. In this system, a bias signal
is introduced into the pitch autopilot al~itude hold loop that
ter~s to displace the aircraft from its reference altitude by an
amount proportional to the detected Mach error. The resulting
altitude error, ~H, defined as the difference between the
reference altitude and the actual altitude, is used as the input
to an integrator in the autothrottle control loop, the outpu-t of
which is used to adjust the e~gine pressure ratio or thrust.
While this system is generally satisfactory, one of its drawbacks
is that the altitude error ~ H, input to the autothrottle is
affected by factors other than the proportional altitude hold bias
generated by Mach error. Atmospheric disturbances, such as gusts
and generally lon~ term pressure waves, and the initial loss of
altitude in turn can also affect ~ H term, resulting in
unnecessary throttle activity and speed excursions. In addition,
no provision is made for the timely acquisition of the desired
Mach nwmber should the system be er~aged at a Mach number
significantly different from the desired Mach number.
The present invention differs from the first of the above
attempts to solve the neutral speed stability problem in that the
primary pitch control into the aircraft's autopilot is Mach error
instead of Mbch rate or ~ashed out Mach errorr and that the
primary input to the autothrottle system is Mach error which has
been passed through a special isolatiQn filter and summed hnth the
t
integral of Mach error~ This combinat ~n no~ only eliminates the
need for a turbulence detector, but more importantly ser~es to
isolate the dynamics of the automatic pilot pitch axis control
system from the dynamics of the autothrottle control system, thus
minimizing or elminating any cross coupling efects inherent in
the prior art system first described above. In addition,
provisions are made through an independent control to allow for
timely acquisition of the desired Mach number.
The present invention is a significant improvement of the
systern described in E.P.O. Application Nb. 82.30~55.0 in that the
primary input to the autothrottle system is filtered Mach error
plus integrated Mach error instead of integrated altitude error.
m e control system of the present invention eliminates the adverse
effects of atmospheric disturbances and aircraft bank angles on
the autothroktle system, thereby desirably minimizing throttle
act;vity~ In addition, an independent control is used which
allows for the timely acquisition of the desired Mach number.
SUI~RY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a flight control system which
assures the acquisition and maintenance of a uel efficient cruise
speed, usually expressed in Mach number, for modern jet aircraEt,
with a minimum of throttle activity and cross coupling hetween the
aircraft's pitch and theust axes.
Upon initialization of the system, either manually by the
pilot of the aircraft or automatically by the leveling off of the
aircraEt at a selected cruise altitude through the aircraft's
autopilot, the thrust required to maintain the desired Mach number
is computed based on optimum performance data of the aircra~t.
This required thrust may be expressed in terms of engine pressure
ratio (EPR~ or in engine fan speed (Nl), and serves as the
starting point for further control adjustments.
,
1 If, at initiallzation, the value of the signal proportional
to the actual Mach number of the aircraft subtracted from a
signal proportional to the desired Mach number (hereinafter
defined as Mach error), is less than a predetermined level, the
Mach error signal is introduced at an appropriate gain leYel to
the altitude hold control of the aircraft's autopilot. This
causes the aircraft to climb or dive withln predetermined
limits to exchange potential energy for kinetic energy and
thus serves to maintain speed for short term speed perturbations
of the aircraft.
Simultaneously, the Mach error signal is passed through an
isolation filter and gain. ~he output of the filter is summed
with a signal proportional to the integral. of the Mach error
signal to create an incremental thrust control signal which is
added algebraically to the originally computed thrust signal
to thereby maintain the aircraft at the desired Mach number.
The resultant total thrust control signal is converted to an
EPR OR Nl target which.is used by the autothrottle system to
adjus.t the throttles appropriately. Thus, long term errors in
the computed thrust are automatically compensated.
If, at initialization, -the Mach error exceeds a predetermined
value, a separate control is used through suitable switching
logic. The magnitude of the Mach error signal is passed
through a non-linear gain and this signal determines an
increm~ntal EPR or Nl to be summed algebraically with the
target EPR or Nl derived from the computed re~uired thrust.
This total is limited in the throttle servo controls to a value
within the engine operating limits and is then used by the
autothrottle system to adjust the thrust o~ the aircraft. The
resultant increase or decrease in thrust will cause the aircraft
to accelerate or decelerate, respectively, toward the desired
3~
cruise Mach number. As the Mach error is reduced, iOe.,
as the desired Mach number is approached, the incremental
EPR or Nl is decreased toward the original target until, at
a predetermined value of Mach error, control of speed
reverts to the method described previously.
The invention may be summarized according to a
first broad aspect as a speed control system for aircraft
having an automatic throttle control means for controlling
the thrust imparted to the aircraft and having first dyna-
mic response characteristics and an automatic al-titude
control means for controllin~ pitch attitude to maintain a
predetermined altitude and having second dynamic response
characteristics comprising: means providing a speed error
signal proportional to the difference between a reference
speed and the actual speed, means providing an altitude
error signal proportional to the difference between a ref-
erence altitude and the actual altitude, first integrator
means responsive to said speed error signal for controlling
said throttle control means, second integrator means res-
~0 ponsive to said altitude error signal and said speed errorsignal for controlling said altitude control means, and
isolation filter means responsive to said speed error signal
for additionally controlling said throttle control means,
said filter having a frequency response to said speed error
signal such as to minimize inter~erence ~etween said first
and second dynamic response characteristics.
According to a second broad aspect, the
invention is a cruise speed control system for aircraft
comprising: automatic throttle control means having auto-
matic thrust control means for maintaining the speed of the
aircraft at a predetermined reference speed, automatic pilot
means having automatic altitude control means for maintaining
the aircraft at a predetermined alti~ude, means providing
a speed error signal proportional to the difference between
the actual airspeed of the aircraft and said reference speed,
means providing an altitude error signal proportional to the
difference between the actual altitude of the aircraft and
said predetermined altitude, means for supplying said alt-
itude error and said airspeed error signal to said autom-
atic altitude control means, means for integrating said
speed error signal and for supplying the output thereof to
said automatic throttle control means/ isolation filter
means responsive to said speed error signal, and means for
supplyin~ said filtered speed error signal to said automatic
throttle control means, the signal transfer function of said
filter means being such as to compensate for any difference
between the dynamic response characteristics of said auto-
matic throttle control means and said automatic pilot means
to said speed error signal supplied thereto.
BRIEF ~ESCRIPTION OF THE DR~WINGS
Figure 1 is a schematic block diagram illustra-
ting a preferred embodiment of the present invention and
constitutes that apparatus active in a cruise control mode
of a complete aircraft performance management syst~m;
6a
6j~j
E'igure 2 is a graph illustrating the thrust
required to overcome aircraft drag at a desired Mach cruise
speed for a typical jet transport aircraft;
Figure 3 is a graph illustrating the engine
pressure ratio (EPR) required to produce a target thrust
at a desired Mach cruise speed for one engine of a typical
jet transport aircraft~
DESCRIPT~ON OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIr~NT
~ . .
Referring to Figure 1, -the aircraft apparatus involved in
producing or controlling the aerodynamic forces acting on
the aircraft includes an automatic throttle control system
for controlling aircraft thrus-t -through the engines and an
automatic flight control system for controlling the pitch
attitude of the craft through the eleva-tors.
In the illus-trated embodiment, the aircraft is
a typical three turbojet engine transport having convent-
ional three throttle servomotor controls 1, 2, 3 which op-
erate the respective throttle linkages through conventional
noback clutch mechanisms 4, 5, 6 which may be of the type
disclosed in the present inventor's U.S. Patent 3,505,912
assigned to the present assignee. The throttle servos are
each controlled from respecti.ve conventional engine pressure
ratio sensors 7~8,9 via leads 10,
6b
9~
1 11, 12,summin~ junctions 13, 14, 15 and leads 16, 17, 18, the
latter representing EPR error signals which are the difference
between the actual engine EPR'S and the EPR references or EPR
targets computed in computers 19, 20, 21 as will be described
below. Thus, in conventional fashion, the engine throttles are
automatically controlled so as to establish and maintain the
actual engine EPR'S at their desired reference or target EPR.
The autothrottle control system also includes conventional EPR
limits (not shown) which establish the maximum EPR at which the
engines are allowed to operate under existing ambient temperatures,
atmospheric pressure, etc., as established ~y the engine and
aircraft manufacturers. However, EPR settings for cruise are
normally well below these limits. As is well known, EPR provides
a measure of the thrust the engines impart to the aircraft and
this characteristics is described in the present assignee's
U.S. Paten~ 4,110,605.
The automatic flight control system is entirely con-
ven~ional. As is well known, it includes gyroscopic roll, pitch
and yaw references, roll, pitch, and yaw computers and roll, pitch
~and yaw control surface servomotors for controlling -these control
surfaces to in turn control the attitude and flight path of the
aircraftu A typical autopilot is disclosed in the present
assignee's U.S. Patent 2,998,946. For purposes of the present
invention only, the pitch control computer 25 is illustrated and
constitutes a means for controlling the pitch attitude of the
aircraft. As shown in detail in ~he ~eferenced '946 patent, the
autopilot includes an altitude hold mode. In this mode an altitude
deviation sensor supplies an altitude error signal to the autopilot
25 pitch channel, through a displacement path 25a and integral path
25b which pitches the aircraft up or down in order to reduce the
altitude error to zero in conventional fashion.
1 In accordance with the present invention, an optimum
or most economical reference or target Mach number cruise spèed
MTGT is computed by the performance management system Mach
reference computer 26 which target is based on e~isting measurable
and known flight parameters including aircraft weight and drag
characteristics and external parameters including pressure
altitude, air temperature and winds. Various reference cruise
speeds may be conventionally computed depending on desired
over-all economy goals such as maximum cruise speed, economy
cruise speed, maximum range cruise speed and the like.
These various Mach reference speeds and the relationship
of the aircraft and aerodynamic parameters invol~ed in computing
the same are described in Report No. NASA TM-78519 entitled
"Characteristics of Constrained Optimum Trajectories with
Specified Range" by Heintz, Erzberger and Homer Lee, Ames
Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035. Alternatively,
of course, the desired or target Mach cruise speed may be set by
the pilot through a conventional speed set knob and readout.
The Mach reference computer 26 provides three outputs 27, 28, 29,
the high and low limit signals on leads 27 and 29 provide buffet
protection and together with mid-value selector 30 assures that
the control system operates between the high and low limits.
Thus, the output of mid-value selector 30 on lead 31 is the
system Mach target speed and the Mach reference computer 26
and mid-value selector constitute a means for providing on lead
31 a signal representing a reference cruise speed or Mach target
speed, MTGT, for the aircraft.
The Mach target signal on lead 31 is supplied as one
input to the EPR target computers 19, 20 and 21 for each of the
aircraft's engines. The other inputs to each o:f the EPR target
computers is each engine's contribution to the total thrust
re~uired to be imparted to the aircra-ft to overcome the aircraft's
3~3,6:~
dra~ at the reEerence or target Mach number and altitude. The
latter signal is yenerated by the thrust target computer 35 which
is responsive to the Mach target signal on lead 31 and a signal on
lead 36 proportional to the weight of the aircraft as computed by
a weight c~nputer 37. Since -~he actual weight term required by
the thrust target computer 35 is the actual w~ight to pressure
altitude ratio W/ ~ , the pressure altitude factor S is obtained
from conventional air data computer 38 on lead 39 and is supplied
to divider 40 so that the weight signal on lead 36 is the required
W/ S signal for thrust target computer 35.
me weight canuter 37 may be apparatus responsive to the
manifest weight modified by fuel flow in conventional Eashion or
may be of the type disclosed in the above-referenced U.S. Patent
4,110,605. However, a preferred weight computer may be of the
type disclosed in the present inventor's E.P.O. ~pplication
N~ 82~306656.8, published on June 29, 1983 entitled "Enroute
Weight Computer for Aircraft".
The thrust target signal computation may be performed by
entirely conventional analog or digital techniques. Within
the computer 35 is stored the data illustrated graphically in
Figure 2. For example, if a digital camputer is used, this
graphical data is suitably coded and stored in a digital PROM.
me computer 35 receives the MTGT and W~ signals, which signals
are used conventionally to address the PRO~. to determine the
aircraft drag term D/ ~ corresponding thereto~ Since in the
cruise mode~ the thrust must be equal to the drag, the D~ ~ term
is required T/~ for the aircraft to maintain the Mach target
for the existing weight and cruise altitude. For example, if the
desired Mach target is .68 and the existirg aircraft W/S is
400,000 pounds, the required target T/~ is 30,000 pounds. mus,
the output of computer 35 on lead 41 is a signal proportional to
the thrust target (T ~)TGT
1 This signal is divided by the nurnber of engines, in the present
illustration 3, by divider 42 and supplied to EPR computers 19,
20 and 21 through lead 43. I-~ should be recognized that the
PROM data is nominal data derived from flight test of a new
aircraft and engines which data will vary with age. As will be
described below, the present invention provides means for
compensating for any changes in or departures from this nominal
data.
Each of the EPR target computers 19, 20 and 21 are the same
and operate in the same manner as the thrust target computer 35.
Within each EPR target compu-ter is stored the data illustrated
graphically in Figure 3~ Again, if a digital computer is used,
this graphical data, one set for each aircraft engine, is stored
in a digital PROM. Each computer receives the MTGT and (T~S )TGT
signals, which signals are used conventionally to address the
appropriate PROM to determine the corresponding EPR target. For
example, if the desired MTGT is .68 and the total (T/~ )TGT
is 30,000, and assuming all engines are identical, each engine
will ha~e to supply 10,000 pounds and the EPR target for each
~0 engine would be 1.68. Thus, the output signal for each EPR TGT
computer on leads 19', 20' and 211 are supplied to the summing
~unctions 13, 14 and 15 as described above.
Assume that the system is activated either manually or
automatically when the Mach error is less than, say 0 0025M
Under these conditions, switches 50 and 51 will be in the
positions shown in Figure l; that is, switch 50 will be closed
and switch 51 will be open. Assume further that the aircraft
drag is significantly greater than the nominal value. The
computed thrust target on lead 41 will be inadequate to maintain
the desired Mach number and the aircra~t will begin to decelerate
or slow down. The actual Mach number is sensed by Air Data
Computer 38 and isfil ere~ by filter 61 to minimize signal noise.
-10 -
~9~
The filtered Mach si~nal on leacl 57 is subtracted Erom the Mach
~arget on lead 31 at summlng junction 56 providing a Mach errvr
signal ~ M on lead ~5. me Mach error signal is simultaneously
applied to the input of an integrator 52 and an isolation filter
53. Since both the autothrottle servo loop and the autopilot
servo loop includes displacement and integral paths, the filter 53
provides frequency isolation between the pitch axis of the
autopilot and the autothrottle system. The filter 53 also
minimizes the effects of short term gusts and longer term
atmospheric pressure waves, while at the same time allowing
reasonably timely corrections for speed errors. In one typical
application, the isolation Eilter 53 was designed to provide the
following transfer function
e out = _ (e in )
~ (r~ + 1)
me output signal of the integrator on lead 55 is summed with the
output signal of the isolation Eilter on lead ~2 at summing
junction 63, the output signal of which constitutes a signal
corresponding to an incremental thrust required to compensate for
the higher than nominal drag. This incremental thrust signal is
added to the target thrust signal on lead 41 at summing j~mction
49 to determine the total thrust required to maintain the desired
speed. As the additional thrust causes the aircraft to accelerate
toward the desired Mach number, the Mach error will, of course,
decrease toward zero. As zerc error is achieved, the output of
the isolation filter 53 will be zero, but the output signal of the
integrator 52 will maintain a value equal to the incremental
thrust required to maintain the desired Mach number. miS
incremental thrust is a direct mesurement of the actual aircraft
drag minus the nominal drag since in unaccelerated
~i ~
3~
1 cruise flight the thrust of the aircrat must equal the drag.
Thus, -the steady state output signal of the integrator on lead
55 when the desired Mach has been obtained is divided by the
Target thrust on lead 41 to compute a Drag Degradation Ratio
signal on lead 54 which is used as an input to the Mach Ref.
Computer 26 to adjust the Mach Target, thus automatically
compensating for any drag difference due to any engine
degradation over time and/or any changes in the drag
characteristics of the aircraft.
In accordance with the present invention, the Mach error
signal on lead 65 which is essentially a displacement command
signal, is also supplied through a displacement gain 66 to
the autopilot 2S pitch channel, which in cruise is normally
in an altitude hold mode~ In this mode, the altitude hold
sensor 45 (which may be part of the autopilot or part of the
performance management system and controlled by conventional
intersystem switching) provides a signal ~H, on lead 46 to
the autopilot through displacement path 25a and conventional
integral path 25b upon departure from the cruise altitude to
20 . pitch the aircra~t up or down in order to reduce the altitude
error signal to zero and return the aircraft to its reference
cruise altitude in conventional fashion.
A signal proportional to the rate of change of actual Mach
M on lead 68 is derived through a rate taker 57 responsive to
the actual Mach signal on lead 57 and combined at summing
]unction 69 with the Mach error signal on lead 65 and the
xesultant thereof processed through limiter 70 (to protect
against excessive altitude changes) and combined with the
altitude deviation or altitude error signal on lead ~6 at
summing junction 71 and transmitted to the autopilot pitch
~omputer 25.
-12-
l As discussed at the outset, it is a principal object of
the present invention to provide a fuel efficient Mach cruise
control system wherein the corr~anded Mach speed is automatically
maintained with minimum throttle activity. The above-described
cruise speed control system accomplishes this by providing
vernier control of speed through controlling the direction of
the aircraft lift vector and providing vernier control of
altitude by controlling the to~al energy of the aircraft by
adding or subtracting thrust. It will be noted that the
generally short term speed signals ~M and M are controlled
through the control of pitch attitude and that only long term
speed signals MTGT T~ and T/~ are controlled through the
control of the throttles, thus providing the desired accuracy
and minimization of throttle activity.
Accordingly, the operation of the system may be best
understood by first assuming that the aircraft has achieved
the desired or selected cruise altitude, the throttles have been
set to achieve the cruise Mach for the existing aircraft weight
at that altitude and the autopilot has been engaged in the
20 ` altitude hold mode to automatically hold the selected cruise
altitude. Now, assume that a disturbance is encountered
which results in a reduction in the actual Mach speed. This
speed reduction is sensed by the air data computer 38 resulting
in a change in the actual Mach signal on lead 57 thereby
producing a Mach error signal on lead 65. This error signal
hereinabove referred to as an altitude displacem~nt bias signal
is applied to the autopilot as if it were an altitude error
command and in a sense to decrease altitude; that is, to
pitch the craft downward. As a result, the craft ~ends to
increase its speed in order to reduce the Mach error to zero.
As the Mach error is reduced, the pitch cor~mand decreases and
-13-
3~
1 when the Mach error returns -to ~ero, ~h~ pitch command returns
to zero in order to maintain the commanded Mach speed. The
Mach rate term from rate taker 67 provides a damping func-tion
for the speed control-on-pitch control loop. Note that the
Mach error term provides the pitch command function while the
Mach rate term provides the loop damping ~unction and that
neither of these relatively short-term functions reach the
throttle control loop 2 because of isolation filter 53.
The Mach error tends ~ ~e reduced toward zero by the
exchange of potential and kinetic energies through the action
of the speed control-on-pitch loop as described. As a result
of the energy exchange, the aircraft will be displaced from
the reference altitude by an amount proportional to the Mach
error, but limited to a predetermined amount by limit 70.
Should the Mach error persist in the long term, the auto-
throttle loop will alter ~he total thrust of the aircraft
thus reducing the Mach error to zero, and, hence, the altitude
displacement to zero. In accordance with the present
invention, the isolation filter 53 serves to isolate the
20` autothrottle system rom the short term dynamics of the speed
control-on-pitch loop.
Now let us assume that the system is engaged at an actual
Mach number significantly different from the desired Mach
number as sensed by level detector 75 responsive to this
M signal. In this case, switch 50 will be in the opon
position while switch 51 will be in the closed position.
By this means, the Mach error is supplied to the non-linear
gain 72 and creates an incremental EPR or Nl feed forward
command, the magnitude and algebraic sign of which is
dependent upon the magnitude and algebraic sign of the Mach
error. The output of non-linear gain 72 is divided by the
number o~ aircraft engines, as above, and applied to summing
-14-
~L~'3~
1 junctions 13, 14 and 15 through lead 74. By this means, the
outputs on leads 16, 17 and 18 represent either a substantial
increase or decrease in the EPR target for the desired Mach
number dependent on whether the aircraft must accelerate or
decelexate to achieve the desired Mach number. Throttle servos
1, 2 and 3 adjust the engine pressure ratios to achieve the new
target EPR's as explained above. As the aircrat accelerates
or decelerates towards the desired Mach number, non-linear gain
72 adjusts the incremental EPR or ~1 until, when the Mach error
is less than a predetermined amount e.g. 0.0025M, the
incremental EPR or Nl is zero and switches 50 and 51 are returned
to the positions shown on Fiaure 1. At this time, Mach control
is achieved by the appara-tus described previously.
It is significant to note that in the present invention
there are no high frequency or short term signals used as
primary commands to the autothrottle so that all throttle
controls are smooth and immune to atmospheric disturbances.
-15-
