Canadian Patents Database / Patent 1215724 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1215724
(21) Application Number: 468383
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR PRODUCING 4-ALKOXYANILINES
(54) French Title: PREPARATION DE 4-ALCOXYANILINES
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 260/601.2
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C07C 209/36 (2006.01)
  • B01J 23/38 (2006.01)
  • C07C 211/46 (2006.01)
  • C07C 217/84 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • NAGATA, TERUYUKI (Japan)
  • TAMAKI, AKIHIRO (Japan)
  • OHNISHI, HIROKI (Japan)
  • MIZUTA, HIDEKI (Japan)
(73) Owners :
  • MITSUI CHEMICALS, INCORPORATED (Japan)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1986-12-23
(22) Filed Date: 1984-11-22
(30) Availability of licence: N/A
(30) Language of filing: English

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
222,237/83 Japan 1983-11-28

English Abstract



Title of the Invention
PROCESS FOR PRODUCING 4-ALKOXYANILINES
Abstract of the Disclosure
4-Alkoxyanilines are obtained industrially
advantageously by catalytically hydrogenating a nitroben-
zene in the presence of a noble metal catalyst in a
mixed solvent containing a lower aliphatic alcohol,
sulfuric acid, and water or a lower aliphatic carboxylic
acid or both to induce hydrogenation and a Bamberger-
type rearrangement reaction. The mixed solvent contains
at least 10 moles, preferably 30 to 60 moles, of the
lower aliphatic alcohol per mole of the nitrobenzene, 1
to 10 moles, preferably 2 to 7 moles, of sulfuric acid
per mole of the nitrobenzene, and 2 to 30 % by weight,
preferably 3 to 10 % by weight, of water, the lower
aliphatic carboxylic acid or both.


Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 16 -
What is claimed is:
1. A process for producing a 4-alkoxyaniline,
which comprises catalytically hydrogenating a nitroben-
zene represented by the following formula

Image (I)

wherein R represents a hydrogen atom, a halo-
gen atom, a lower alkyl group or a lower
alkoxy group, and n is 1 or 2, provided that
when R is other than hydrogen, it is bonded
to the o-position and/or the m-position to the
nitro group,
in the presence of a noble metal catalyst in a mixed
solvent containing a lower aliphatic alcohol, sulfuric
acid, and water or a lower aliphatic carboxylic acid or
both, said mixed solvent comprising at least 10 moles,
per mole of the nitrobenzene, of the lower aliphatic
alcohol, 1 to 10 moles, per mole of the nitrobenzene, of
sulfuric acid, and 2 to 30 % by weight of water, the
lower aliphatic carboxylic acid or both.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the content of
water, the lower aliphatic alcohol or both in the mixed
solvent is 3 to 10 % by weight.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the content of


- 17 -
the lower aliphatic alcohol in the mixed solvent is 30
to 60 moles per mole of the nitrobenzene.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein the content of
sulfuric acid in the mixed solvent is 2 to 7 per mole of
the nitrobenzene.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein the lower
aliphatic alcohol is methanol.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein the lower
aliphatic carboxylic acid is acetic acid.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein the nitroben-
zene is o-nitrotoluene.

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.

~2~5~724

-- 1 --
This invention relates to a process for produc-
ing 4-alkoxyar.ilines. More specifically, it relates to
an industrially advantageous process for producing
4-alkoxyanilines, which comprises catalytically hydrogen-
ating a nitrobenzene represented by the general formula

N0
~ (R)n (I)

wh~rein R represents a hydrogen atom, a halo-
gen atom, a lower alkyl group or a lower
alkoxy group, and n is 1 or 2, provided that
when R i~ other than hydrogen, it is bonded to
the o-position and/or the m-position to the
nitro group,
in the presence of a noble metal catalyst in a mixed
solvent containing a lower aliphatic alcohol, sulfuric
acid, and water or a lower aliphatic carboxylic acid or
both.
4-Alkoxyanllines are important intermediates
of dyes and medicin~s. In particular, 2-methyl-4-
methoxyani.line is u~eful as an intermediate of fluoran-
0 s~ries black dyes.Previously, the 4-alkoxyanilines have been
produced from nitrobenzenes through a number of steps,
and the total yields of the products and the economy of
the processes practiced have proved to be very unsatis-


~LW
-- 2factory.
In recent years, attempts were made to produce
4-alkoxyanilines in one step from the nitrobenzenes of
the above general formula (I) in the presence of noble
catalysts in a substantially anhydrous mixed solvent
composed of an alcohol and sulfuric acid. For example,
Journal of the Chemical Society of Japan [1979 (11),
page 1532] reported that 2,4-dimethoxyaniline was ob-
tained in a maximum yield of 27.8~ from o-nitroanisole
as a material by adding dimethyl sulfoxide ~DMSO for
short) as a catalyst poison to the reaction system.
Journal of the Chemical Society of Japan ~1980 (2), page
245] states that 2.2% of p-anisidine was obtained from
nitrobenæene, and particularly~ when o-methylnitroben-
zene was used as a starting material, 2-methyl-4
methoxyaniline was obtained in a maximum yield of 70.2%
by adding DMSO ~in the absence of DMS0, the yield was
48.3~). Journal of the Chemical Society of Japan 11982
(7), page 1237], subsequently published, reported that
2,3-dimethyl-p-anisidine, 2,6-dimethyl-p-anisidine,
l-amino-4-methoxy-naphthalene, and 1-amino-2-methyl-4-
methoxy-naphthalene were obtained from the corresponding
nitro compounds in the presence of DMSO in a maximum
yield of 67.4% ~63.7~ in the absence of DMS0), 72.1%
(45.2~ in the absence of DMSO), 68~, and 55~, respective-
lyO Furthermore, it was reported long ago that p-
anisidine was obtained in a yield of about 40% from


phenylhydroxylamine in a mixed solvent of methanol and
sulfuric acid [Ber., 31, 1500 (1898)].
However, processes for producing 4-alkoxy-
anilines in one step by catalytically hydrogenating
nitro compounds in the presence of noble metal catalyst
utilizing the Bamberger-type rearrangement reaction as
described in the above-cited papers in the Journal of
the Chemical Society of Japan generally give low yields,
and cannot be said to be industrially feasible. As an
attempt to improve such processes, there were suggested
processes as described above in which commercially
acceptable yields are obtained by adding DMSO. Since,
however, DMSO is a very strong catalyst poison, the
expensive noble metal catalysts recovered cannot substan-
tially be re-used. Hence, these processes are very
uneconomical for industrial practice.
The present invention provides an industrially
advantageous improved process for producing 4-alkoxy-
anilines from nitrobenzenes by catalytic hydrogenation.
Mvre specifically, this invention provides a process for
producing 4-alkoxyanilines of high purity in high yields
~rom nitrobenzenes, characterized in that the nitroben-
zenes are catalytically hydrogenated in the presence of
a noble metal catalyst in a mixed solvent obtained by
adding a specified amount of water, a lower aliphatic
carboxylic acid, or both instead of DMSO in the conven-
tional processes to a mixture of a lower aliphatic

~5i72~
- 4
alcohol and sulfuric acid.
It has been found surprisingly that according
to the process of this invention, by performing the
reaction in a mixed solvent prepared by adding a prede-
termined amount of water and/or a lower aliphatic carbox-
ylic acid to a mixture of predetermined amounts of
sulfuric acid and a lower aliphatic alcohoL, the final
desired product can be obtained in high yields despite
the complete absence of DMSO, and that the expensive
noble metal catalyst used in the reaction can be re-
peatedly used for the same reaction.
The reaction solvent used in the process of
this invention is a mixed solvent obtained by adding 2
to 30 ~ by weight, preferably 3 to 10 ~ by weight, of
water, a lower aliphatic carboxylic acid or both to a
mixture of a lower aliphatic alcohol and sulfuric acid.
If the content of water and/or the aliphatic carboxylic
acid i~ outside the above-specified range, the produc-
tion o~ 4-hydroxyanilines and/or anilines as by-products
undesirably increases. The content of the lower ali-
phatic alcohol in the mixed solvent is at least 10
moles, preferably 20 to 100 moles, more preferably 30 to
60 moles, per mole of the starting nitrobenzenes. If it
is less than 10 moles, the yield of the desired product
is low. Excessively large amounts make the process
uneconomical. The content of sulfuric acid in the mixed
solvent is 1 to 10 moles, preferably 2 to 7 moles, per

2~

-- 5 --
mole of the starting nitrobenzenes. If the content of
sulfuric acid is outside this range, there is an appreci-
ably increa~ed formation of anilines and/or unknown
tarry components. If the amount of sul~uric acid be-
comes excessively large, the reaction time becomeslonger, and a marked increase in the formation of un-
known tarry components is observed.
The amount of the mixed solvent used should be
selected by considering the optimum concentration of the
starting nitrobenzene charged and the optimum com-
poQition of the mixed solvent which ensure high yields
o~ the final desired product and can avoid the com-
plexity of withdrawal of the product after the reaction.
Usually, the suitable concentration of the nitrobenzene
charged is 5 to 20 % by weighti the suitable concen-
tration oP the lower aliphatic alcohol in the mixed
solvent i~ 70 to 90 ~ by weight and the suitable concen-
tration of sulfuric acid in the solvent is about 5 to 25
% by weight.
In the mixed solvent, water and the lower
aliphatic carboxylic acid may be present singly or in
combination. Accordingly~ the lower aliphatic carbox-
ylic acid may be used as an aqueous solution. When it
is used as an aqueous solution, considerations must be
given so that at least 2 % by weight of the lower ali-
phatic carboxyilc acid is present in the mixed solvent
and water is present in a specified amount. Suitable

L5i~2~

lower aliphatic carboxylic acids are, for example,
acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and valerianic
acid. Acetic acid an propionic acid are preferred among
these carboxylic acids, and acetic acid is especially
preferred.
In the process of this invention, the reaction
temperature is selected within the range from 0 C to
the boiling point of the mixed solvent, preferably from
30 to 60 C.
Reaction presures from atmospheric pressure to
2 kg/cm -G are suitable for practical purposes. High
pressures are unnecessary and rather tend to increase
the amount of by-product anilines.
The noble catalyst that can be used in this
invention includes, for example, platinum, palladium and
a mixture of these. The metal catalyst is used on an
inert solid carrier, and carbon is advantageous as the
carrier. A catalyst containing 1-5% platinum and/or
palladium on activated carbon is preferred. Catalysts
containing 0.1 to 20~ of such metals are feasible in the
process of this invention. It is preferred to use a
supported catalyst in a catalytic amount corresponding
to 0.01 to 0.10 ~ by weight platinum or palladium based
on the nitrobenzene to be reacted.
Examples of the lower aliphatic alcohols are
methanol, ethanol and propanol. Lower aliphatic alco-
hols having up to 3 carbon atoms are advantageous.

~2~7~:~


Methanol is most preferred because it leads to the
formation of the desired product in a particularly high
yield.
The hydrogenation of the nitrobenzene is
carri d out under the foregoing conditions~ and the
desired product can be withdrawn in the following
manner. First, the reaction mixture after the reaction
i8 filtered to recover the catalyst (which is recycled
to the next reaction). Then, the alcohol is evaporated.
1~ The residue, after adding water if required, is neutral-
i~ed to a pH of 7 to 8. The neutralized solution is
extracted with a suitable organic solvent such as ethyl
acetate, benzene or monochlorobenzene. The oily layer
is distilled under reduced pressure to give the 4
alkoxyaniline.
According to the process of this invention,
the 4-alkoxyanilines can be produced in hlgh yields.
Since the process does not at all use a substance which
becomes a catalyst poison in catalytic hydrogenation,
such as DMSO, the expensive noble~ metal catalyst can be
repeatedly used without any consequent decrease in
yield. This is a great industrial advantage. Particu-
larly, in the production of 2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline
from o-nitrotoluene, a high yield can be maintained to
great industrial advantage.
The following examples illustrate the present
invention specifically.

~ ~ 5'7Z~

EXAMPLE 1
A 5 liter glass reactor equipped with a stir-
rer, a thermometer and a hydrogen introducing tube was
charged with 137.1 g ~1.0 mole) of o-nitrotoluene, 264.5
9 (2.6 moles) of 98% sulfuric acid, 68.6 g of distilled
water, 1518.0 9 (47.4 moles) of methanol and 0.41 g of
3% platinum on carbon as a hydrogenation catalyst.
The reaction was carried out at 50 C under
a slightly elevated pressure of 20 to 30 cmH2O while
zdding hydrogen. The reaction required a period of 300
minutes with the absorption of 52.5 liters until its
termination. At this time, the o-nitrotoluene scarcely
remained in the reaction solution.
Subsequently, the reaction solution was filter-
ed to separate the catalyst. Methanol was evaporatedfrom the filtrate, and 500 9 of distilled water was
added. The mixture was neutralized to a pH of 7.2 with
28~ aqueous ammonia. The neutralized solution was
extracted with 200 g of toluene. The toluene layer wa~
~o washed with a dilute aqeuous solution of sodium hy-
droxide, concentrated and distilled under reduced pres-
sure. There were obtained 22.8 g of o-toluidine as an
initial distillate and 96.8 g ~yield 70.0~) of 2-methyl-
4-methoxyaniline ~boiling point 136-138 C/20 mmHg) as
a main distillate. The main distillate was found to
have a purity of 99.2 ~ by gas chromatography.
Elemental analysis of the main distillate for

Lal~724

g

C8 HllN -
C H N
Calculated (~):70.0 8.08 10.2
Found (~): 69.B 7.98 10.3
EXAMPLE 2
The same reactor as used in Example 1 was
charged with 137.1 g (1.0 mole) of o-nitrotoluene, 264.5
g (2.6 moles) of 98% sulfuric acid, 68.6 g of distilled
water, 1518.0 g (47.4 moles) of methanol and 0.86 g
(containing water) of the catalyst recovered from the
process described in Example 1.
The reaction was carried out in the same way
as in Example 1. The reaction required a period of 310
minutes with the absorption of 52.0 liters of water
until its Sermination.
Subsequently, the reaction solution was worked
up in the ~ame way as in Example 1 to give 22.3 g of
o-toluidine and 97.6 g (yield 70.6 %) of 2-methyl-4-
methoxyaniline. ~he 2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline was found
to have a purity of 99.2~ by gas chromatography.
EXAMPLE 3
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 2 was repeated except that the catalyst recovered
from the process of Example 2 was used instead of the
catalyst recovered from the process of Example 1. The
reaction required a period o~ 310 minutes, and 2-methyl-
4-methoxyaniline WAS obtained in a yield of 70.4%.

~Z~'5~2~

-- 10 --
EXAMPLE 4
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 2 was repeated except that the catalyst re-
covered from the process of Example 3 was used instead
of the catalyst recovered from the process of Example 1.
The reaction required a period of 320 minutes, and
2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline was obtained in a yield of
70~7%O
EXAMPLE 5
The same catalytic reduc~ion reaction as in
Example 2 was repeated except that the catalyst re-
covered from the process of Example 4 was used instead
of the catalyst recovered from the process of Example 1.
The reaction required a period of 320 minutes, and
2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline was obtained in a yield of
71.0%~
EXAMPL E_
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 2 was repeated except that 0.13 g of the same
fre~h catalyst as used in Example 1 was added to the
catalyst recovered ~rom the process of Example 5. The
reaction required a period of 290 minutes with the
absorptiQn of 53.5 liters of hydrogen until its termi-
nation. The reaction solution was worked up in the same
way as in Example 1 to give 22.5 g of o-toluidine and
97.5 g (yield 70.7 %) of 2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline. The
2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline was found to have a purity of



99.4% by gas chromatography.
EXAMPLE 7
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 1 was repeated except that 68.6 g (0.5 mole) o~
o-nitrotoluene was used. The reaction required a period
of 220 minutes with the absorption of 26.4 liters of
hydrogen until its termination. The reaction solution
was worked up in the same way as in Example 1 to give
9.6 g of o-toluidine and 52.1 g (yield 75.2%) of 2-
methyl-4-methoxyaniline. The 2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline
was found to have a purity of 99.0 % by gas chromato-
graphy.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 1 was repeated except that distilled water was
not used. The reaction required 1100 minutes with the
absorption of 57.0 liters of hydrogen until its termi-
nation. me reaction solution was worked up in the same
way as in Example 1. There were only obtained 24.3 9 of
o-toluidine and 72.5 g ~yield 52.5 ~) of 2-methy1-4-
methoxyaniline. The 2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline was found
to have a purity oE 99.3% by gas chromatography.
EXAMPLE 8
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 1 was carried out except that o-nitrotoluene was
used in an amount of 68.6 g ~0.5 mole), and 68.6 g of
glacial acetic a~id was used instead of distiiled water.

~ 2~
- 12 -
The reaction required a period of 220 minutes with the
absorption of 26.4 liters of hydrogen until its termi-
nation. The reactlon solution was worked up in the same
way as in Exa~ple 1 to give 9.0 g of o-toluidine and
53.1 g (yield 76.6%) of 2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline. The
2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline was found to have a purity of
99O0% by gas chromatography.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 8 was repeated except that glacial acetic acid
was not fed. The reaction required a period of 1100
minutes with the absorption of 57.0 liters of hydrogen
until its termination. The reaction solution was worked
up in the same way as in Example 1. But there were
obtained only 24.3 g of o-toluidine and 72.5 g ~yield
52.5%) of 2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline. The 2-methyl-4-
methoxyaniline was found to have a purity of 99.3 % by
gas chromatography.
EXAMPLE 9
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 1 was carried out except that 157.6 g (1.0 mole)
of o-chloronitrobenzene was used instead of 137.1 g (1.0
mole) of o-nitrotoluene. The reaction required a period
of 480 minutes with the absorption of 53.0 liters of
hydrogn until its termination. Subsequently, the re-
action solution was worked up in the same way as in
Example 1 to give 8.9 g of o-chloroaniline as an initial

5~

- 13 -
distillate and 102.9 g (yield 65.0%) of 2-chloro-4-
methoxyaniline ~boiling point 141-143 C/20 mmHg) as a
main di~tillate. The main distillate was found to have
a purity of 99.5 % by gas chromatography.
Elemental analysis of the main distilalte for
C7 H8 Cl NO: -
C H N Cl
Calculated (%J: 53.55.12 8.89 22.5
Found (%): 53.1 5.07 8.84 22.2
EXAMLPLE 10
~ he same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 1 was repeated except that 151.2 g (1.0 mole) of
2,6-dimethyl-nitrobenzene was used instead o~ 137.1 9
(loO mole) of o-nitrobenzene. m e reaction xequired a
period of 290 minutes with the absorption of 53.8 liters
of hydogen until its termination. S~bsequently, the
reaction solution was worked up in the same way as in
Example 1 to give 2~.0 g of 2,6-dimethylaniline as an
initial distillate and 108.9 g (yield 71.8 ~) o~ 2,6-
dimethyl-4-methoxyaniline as a main distillate. The
main distillate was found to have a purity of 99.7 % by
gas chromatography.
EXAMPLE 11
The same catalytic reduction reac~ion as in
Example 1 was carried out except tha~ 157.6 g ~1.0 mole)
of o-chloronitrobenzene was u~ed instead of 137.1 g (loO
mole) of o-nitrotoluene and a 50% aqueous solution of

~2~L~7~9~

-- 14 --
acetic acid was used instead of distilled water. The
reaction required a period of 480 minutes with the
abss>rption of 53.0 liters of hydrogen until its termi-
nation. Subsequently, the reaction solution was worked
5 up in the same way as in Example 1 to give 8.5 g of
o-chloroaniline as an initial distillate and 103.7 9
(yield 65.5 %? of 2-chloro-4-methoxyaniline ~boiling
point 141 to 143 C/20 mmHg) as a main distillate.
The main distillate was found to have a purilty of 99.5%
10 by gas chromatography.
Elemental analysis of the main distillate for
C7H8 ClN0:-
C H N Cl
Calculated ~ 53.3 5.12 8.89 22.5
Found ~%)53.2 5.098.8422.2
EXAMPLE 12
The same catalytic xeduc~ion reaction as in
Example 1 was repeated except that propionic acid was
used lnstead o distilled water. The reaction ended in
2~ 320 minutesr The reaction solution was worked up in the
same way as in Example 1 to give 2240 g of o-toluidine
and 98.3 g ~yield 71.1%) of 2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline.
EXAMPLE 13
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 1 wa~ repeated except that the amount of distil-
led water was changed to 264.5 g. The reaction ended in
270 minutez. The reaction solution wa worked up in the


~5~7Z:~

-- 15 --
~ame way as in Example 1 to give 23~1 9 of o~toluidine
and 83.6 9 ~yield 60.5~) of 2-methyl-4-methoxyaniline.
17~6 9 o 2-methyl-4-hydroxyaniline was also ~ormed as a
by- pr odu ct .
EXAMPL E 14
The same catalytic reduction reaction as in
Example 1 was repeated except that the amount of 98~
~uluric acid was changed to lOOû g, or in other words,
a mlxed solverlt composed of 58.796 by weight of methanol,
~o 37.9~ by weight of sulfuric acid and 3O4% by weight of
water was used. The reaction required a period of 1050
minutes until its termination. m e reaction solution
was worked up in the same weay as in Example 1 to give
20~5 g of o-toluidine and 89.9 % (yield 65.04~ of 2
methyl-4-methoxyaniline.

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1215724 was not found.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Admin Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1986-12-23
(22) Filed 1984-11-22
(45) Issued 1986-12-23
Expired 2004-11-22

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1984-11-22
Registration of a document - section 124 $50.00 1998-06-04
Current owners on record shown in alphabetical order.
Current Owners on Record
MITSUI CHEMICALS, INCORPORATED
Past owners on record shown in alphabetical order.
Past Owners on Record
MITSUI TOATSU CHEMICALS, INC.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :




Filter

Document
Description
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd)
Number of pages Size of Image (KB)
Drawings 1993-07-16 1 15
Claims 1993-07-16 2 47
Abstract 1993-07-16 1 21
Cover Page 1993-07-16 1 19
Description 1993-07-16 15 511