Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
96
REINFORCED MICROPOROUS MEMBRANE
BACKGROUhlD OF THE INVENTION
1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to microporous membranes, and
more particularly to reinforced microporous membranes suitable for
the filtr~tion of aqueous fluids, such as biological liquids and high
purity water used in the electronics industry.
2 PRIOR ART
Nylon microporus membranes are well known in the art.
For example, U.S. Patent No. 3,876,738 to Marinaccio et al (1975)
describes a process for preparing nylon microporous membranes by
quenching a solution of a f i Im forming polymer in a non-solvent
system for the polymer. European Patent Application 0 0û5 536 to
Pall et al (1979) describes a similar type nylon membrane and
process.
Other type polymeric microporous membranes, including
nylon, and processes for producing such membranes ore described,
for example, in the following U.S. Patents:
3764~,668 to ~. (~g72);
4~203,847 to Grandine, !! (1980);
4,203~848 llo Grand ne, 11 S1980); and
4,2479498 to astro ( I 98û).
~A~
~2~59~i
--3
Commercially available nylon mlcroporous membranes
are available from Pall Corp., Glencove, New York, under the
trademark ULTIPOR N66. ~nother commercially signiicant r~embrane
made of polyvinylidene fluoride is available frolll Millipore
Corp., Bedford, Massachusetts, under the -trademark DURAPO~E.
m is membrane is probably produced by the aforementioned
Grandine, II patents.
Additionally, the Assignee oE this application
is selling two types of cationically charge modified nylon
microporous membranes under the trademark ZETAPOR. These
membranes are described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 4,473,475
to rnes et al, issued September 25, 1984; and U.S. Patent
No. 4,473,474 to Ostreicher et al, issued September 25, 1984.
Barnes et al describes the use of charge modified membranes
for the filtration of high purity water (18 megohm~centimeter
resistivity) used in the electronics industry; and Ostreicher
et al describes the use of charge modified membranes for -the
filtration of parenteral or body liquids.
Generally, the methods for producing a microporous
membrane include spreading a casting solution on a substrate
to form a thin film thereon, which eventually is formed into
a microporous membrane. For example, the aforementioned
Marinaccio et al process produces a microporous membrane through
-
the quench technique. This technique involves casting or
extruding a solution of a film-forming polymer in a solvent
system, casting the solution on a substrate to form a film
and quenching the film in a bath which includes a non-solvent
for the polymer. The Pall application involves a similar type
process.
` ~L2~1S~
The aforementioned Pall application is the most relevant
known prior art relating to the formation of microporous membranes
into useful laminates for filtration discs, cclrtridges etc. As
described by Pall a polymer solution is cast on a substrate which may
be porovs or non-porous to form a thin microporous membrane on the
substrate. The membrare produced may then be removed from the
substrate, washed and combined, i.e. Iaminated, with another similar
type membrane to form a dual layer membrane. This dual layer
membrane is then dried under restraint forming a membrane having
particle removal characteristics superior to those of the individual
layers. Pal I indicates that the membrane layers c~n have the same or
different porosities, have tapered pores or uniform pores, and be
supported or unsupported. If a membrane layer is supported the
substrate upon which it is cast is not removed from the membrane,
i.e. the substrate is an integral part of the membrane. Such a
substrate is preferably a porous material that is wetted by the
polymer solution so that the solution will penetrate the substrate
during casting and become firmly attached thereto during formation
of the microporous membrane. Pal I states that such supported
membranes have a somewhat higher pressvre drop than unsupported
membranes (i.e. Iower flow rate for a given pressure differential),
and that the increase ;n pressure drop is small if the supporting web
has an open strucfure.
The problems associated with the dual layer type filtrG-
tion membranes of Pall, are comparatively major when one considers
the uses for such membranes (eOg. the filtration of parenteral or body
-- ~2~5~g06
liquids, high purity water, pharmaceuticals, beverages, ~?tC ), the
small pore size of the membranes (i.e., less than about 1.2 microns
and usually aboot .2 microns), the manipulation required to form the
membrane into usable forms, e.g. cartridges, and that preferably the
membrane be useful with either side facing upstream. It has been
found by the Assignee in the production of the commercial forms of
the membranes described in the aforementioned Barnes et al and
Ostreicher et al applications, that a non-reinforced dual layer mem-
brane is generally too fragile, e.g. tends to crack when pleated to
form filtration cartridges and generally c~uses too high a reject rate
for cartridges used as sterilizing filtrafion media. In attempting to
solve this problem by reinforcing the membranes by casting directly
onto a reinforcing web and then laminating the layers together, it
was found that very careful control over the casting conditions had to
be maintained to avoid streaking, non-uniform wetting of the web,
pin-holes, air-bubbles, etc. -More specifically, it was discovered that
air bubbles tended to form in the membrane in the areas of crossover
between the pieces of yarn forming the web, and that such air
bubbles cause objectionable voids or pockets in the final membrane.
In some instances, such air bubbles resulted in an opening through
the membrane which rendered it useless. Additionally, as indicated
in Pall, the pressure drop across the membrane tended to be too high
(or the flow too low).
Additional prior art of interest, none of which solve all of
the above problems, are the following U.S. Patents:
Q6
-6-
2,806,256 and 2,940,871 to Smith-Johannsen ( 1960)
describes producing a microporous film by fusing fine particles of
thermoplastic material while dispersed throughout a vlscous or
continuous inert matrix medium and then dissolving out the inert
mntrix medium. The membrane may be used for f iltration~ The
thermoplastic material may be q polyamide. The dispersion may be
caiendered, knifed7 molded, dip coated, or rol led onto a backing
material to reinforce the film. The backing material is desirably at
least as porous as the microporous film itself.
2,960,462 to Lee et al t 1960) describes the use of
laminated permeation membranes for the separation of organic
chemical mixtures. The laminated membrane cùnsists of a thin layer
or film of a selective membrane material and a thicker film of a
membrane material having a higher permeation rate. The Iqminated
membrane is employed so that the film layer having the higher
permeation rate is in contact with the mixture of the chemicals to be
separated.
3,19û,765 to Yuan (1965) describes, polymeric films ad-
herently united to fibrous substrates. The primary use is as a
substitute leather, although the materials may be used as filters. The
products are produced by applying a layer of a polymer-containing
solution to one or both sides of a flexible porous Fibrous substrate.
The leather when bathed and dried in the manner described therein,
becomes a microporous polymeric layer integrally united to the
fibrous substrate. The sheet material formed has a high permeability
to vqpors and relatively low permeability to liquids, i.e., it is
breatheable yet water repellent.
215~
3,100,721 and 39208,875 to Holden (1965) describes the
manufacture of leather lik0 sheet materials having a microporous/-
durable elastomeric material in superposed adherence with a fabric
or ofher porous fibrous sheet material. The uses for such vapor
permeable sheets are as shoe uppers, upholstery and clothing. The
sheet products are produced by applying a layer of a solution
contqining a polymer to one or both sides of a flexible porous fibrous
substrate.
3,389,045 to Jones et al ( 1968) describes a method of
producing thin thermoplastic films having a multicolored ombre.
Such films are used for decorative cvrtains, wearing apparel, surface
covering for floors, walls, furniture, etc. The process involves the
controlled calendering of several separate thermoplastic materials of
different colors.
3,551,244 to Fores_er et al (1970) describes an ultrathin
polymer film on a support membrane for use as a reverse osmosis
membrane.
3,556,305 to Shorr ~1971 ) describes a reverse osmosis
membrane comprising (a) an anisotropic membrane, (b) n very thin
layer of a film forming adhesive polymer and (c) a very thin diffusive
type membrane film overlying the adhesive polymer.
3,615,024 to Michaels ( 1971~ describes an anisotropic
polymeric membrane which is formed by casting the film on an
impermeable surface, e.g., a glass or metal surface, or a permeable
surface, e.g. paper. Particularly advantageous materials for use are
permeable non-wettable, non-woven sheets, for example, polyolefin
fiber felts.
~L2~ 6
3,679,540 to Zimmerman et al ~ 1972) describes reinforced
microporous films used for sterile packaging, hospital bed sheets, and
pillow liners. The reinforced films are produced by iaminating a
specifically characterized microporous polymer film onto a speci-
fically characterized microporous film. The reinforced film is said to
have increased strength and high permeability.
3,7û9,841 to Quentin (1973) describes sulphonated poly-
arylether-sulphone ion exchange membrane cornbined with q rein-
forcing support.
3,721,596 to Drake (1973) describes an osmotic desalina-
tion membrane produced by immersing an apertured support in a
casting solution and then allowing the film to set.
3,744,642 to Scala et al (1973) describes a desalination
membrane having a membrane layer of polymeric material, e.g.
poiyamide, in contact with a substrate. The membranes produced on
the substrate are generaliy homogenous and between û.l and 1.0 mils
thick. The membrane can coat one or both sides of the substrate and
can be applied continuously. The substrate can be interwoven or
felted fibers of paper7 plastic, glass, etc. The thin polymeric film
which is formed comprises interlocked polymer chains in contact with
each other and which generally extend into the pores within the
substrate.
3,762,566 to Del P ce (1973) describes a supported semi-
permeabie membrane produced by impregnating the surface of a
porous support with a non-solvent for the film forming polymer used
in a subseauently applied casting solution.
~2~ 6
3,912,834 to Imai et al ( 1975) describes a reinforced
ultrafiltration or reverse osmosis membrane. Porous backing
rnaterials ure impregnated prior to coating with a ~ilm forminy
polymer solution~ with a liauid in which the polymer is insoluble to
the extent that at least one of the surfaces of the backing material
has remained substantinlly free from the liquid while other portions,
especiolly the interior thereof become wet. The coating solution of
the film-forming polymer in a volatile solvent is then applied to the
surface of the backing material and the coating layer is then gelled
or otherwise treated to give a selectively permeable membrane on
the backing rnaterial.
39951,815 to Wrasidlo (1976) describes a composite semi-
permeable membrane wherein an ultra thin film is formed in situ
upon a microporous substrate. More specifically, a polysulfone
membrnne is cast on to a tightly woven dacron cloth. This fabric
reinforced po!ysulfone substrate is then presoaked in a cyanoethy-
lated polyethylenimine aqueous solution. The membrane is dried and
disposed upon a glass plate and immersed again in the same aqueous
solution to produce the composite "polyamide membrane."
4,005,012 to Wrasidlo ( 1977) describes a process for
producing a semi-permeable anisotropic membrane useful in reverse
osmosis processes. The membranes are prepared by forming a
polymeric thin film possessing semi-permeable properties, on a
microporous support.
4,026,977 to Bourganel ( 1977~ describes a process for
producing an anisotropic membrane by casting a solution of a
~5~
Io
sulfonated polyaryl ether/sulfone on a support immersiny the support
coated with the layer of polymer in a coagulating bath and then
recovering the resulting membrane. The support can also be covered
with a reinforcement material intended to reinforce the membrcne.
This reinforcement material can consist of a woven fabric, a net or
knitted fabric.
4,061,821 to ~y~ ( 1977) describes a semi--
permeable composite membrane consisting of a porous substance and
a reinforcing material embedded therein. The method of producing
the membrane comprises impregnating the reinforcing material with
a coagulating liqvid. The reinforcing cloth may be polyester. The
semipermeable membrane may be copolymers of acrylonitrile,
cellulose acetate, polyamides, polyurethanes, polysulfones.
4,201,838 to Go!dberg (1980) describes a laminated micro-
porous article consis~ing of at least two layers or plys of thermoset
or thermoplastic microporous material and a polyester non-woven,
heat bonded web. The laminate is particularly useful as a battery
separator.
4,2û7,18~ to Marze describes a screen supported or rein-
forced semi-permeable membrane which is embedded in a flexible
sopport of woven fabric, non-woven fabric or a net. The membrane is
produced by casting a solution of a polymer on the reinforcement
material followed by removal of the solvent, e.g. by evaporation
and/or coagulation.
4,214,994 to Kitano (1980) describes a reverse osmosis
membrane for use to purify sea water into plain water. The mem-
brane comprises a skin layer as an active layer and a gel layer to
~Z~5~
support the skin layer. An improvement of flux, i.e., passing rate of
purified water, is achieved by burying a porous sheet, such as plain
woven cloth or non-woven fabric, in the gel layer.
4,244~817 to Yaginuma ( 1981 ) describes a process for
preparing a semi-permeable membrane comprising coating a thin
polyamine film on a reinforced microporous substrate and then
subsequenfly treating to crosslink the polyamine.
4,277,344 to Cadotte ( 1981 ) describes a process for
making a reverse osmosis membrane by coating a porous support
layer with a polyamine component and then contacting the thus
coated support with the polyacyl halide component to initiate poly-
rner ization .
OBJIECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INYENTION
It is an object of this invention to provide a novel
reinforced laminated filtration membrane and novel process for
producing such membrane.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a
reinforced laminated filtration membrane particularly suitable for
the filtration of biological or parenteral liquids.
It is still a further object of this invention to provide a
reinforced laminated filtration membrane particularly suitable for
the filtration of high purity water for the electronics industry.
It is still another object of this invention to provide a
reinforced laminated membrane which is characterized by
~2~
unexpected high flow rates for a given pressure differential, a highly
uniform surface, durability and flexqbility.
These anci other objects of this invention are attained by
the novel reinforceci lamirlated fiitr~tion membrane of this invention.
The membrane comprises:
cl) a porous reinforcing weh impregnated with a
polymeric microporous inner membrane; and
b) nt least one poiymeric microporous outer membrane
laminated to each side of the impregnated web9 wherein the pore size
of the inner membrane is greater than the pore size of the outer
membranes.
The invention is further directed to a process for
producing the reinforced membrane by impregnating the reinforcing
web with the inner membrane, followed by laminating the outer
membranes to each side of the impregnated web.
The preferred polymeric membranes are nylon having a
pore size of from .ûS to 1.2 microns.
The reinforced laminated filtration membrane of this
invention is preferabiy cationically charge modified. The charge
modified membrane is particularly useful for the filtration of
parenteral or biological liquids and high purity water (at ieast about
18 megohm-centimeter resistivity) for the eiectronics industry.
The FIGURE forming a part of this specification is a
cross-sectional side elevation of a preferred apparatus used for
irnpregnating the reinforcing web with microporous membrane by the
preferred process of this invention.
~s9~
- I 4-
DETAILED DE5CRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The inner and outer membranes of the reinforced
laminqted filtration membrane of this invention are produced from an
organic polymeric microporous membrane. Such membranes are well
known in the urt.
By the use of the term "microporous membrane" as used
herein, it is meant a porous single layer membrane having a pore size
of at least .05 microns or larger or an Initial Bubble Point (IBP), as
that term is used herein, in water of less than 120 psi. A maximum
pore size useful for this invention is about 1.2 microns or an IBP of
greater than about 8 psi. Preferablyg but not necessarily, this
membrane is substantially symmetrical and isotropic. By
"symmetrical" it is meant that the pore structure is substantially the
same on both sides of the membrane. Asymmetric membr~nes, i.e.
membranes having one side formed with a very tight thin layer which
is supported by a much more porous open structure, may also be
utilized in this invention. By the use of the term "isotropic" it is
meant the membrane has a uniform pore structure throughout the
membrane.
Preferably, the microporous membranes are hydrophilic.
By the use of the term "hydrophilic" in describing the membranes, it
is meant a rnembrane which adsorbs or absorbs water. Generaliy,
such hydrophilicity is produced by a sufficient amount of hydroxyl
(OH-), carboxyl (-COOH), amino (-NH2) and/or similar functional
groups on the surface of the membrane. Such groups assist in the
adsorption and/or absorption of the water onto the membrane. Such
hydrophiiicity is particularly useful in the filtration of aqueous fluids.
. .. .
lZ15~ )6
Preferred microporous membranes are those produced
from nylon. The term "nylon" is intended to embrace film forming
polyamide resins including copolymers and terpolymers which include
the recurring amido grouping.
While, generally, the various nylon or polyamide resins are
all copolymers of a diamine and a dicarboxylic acid7 or homopolymers
of a lactam Gnd an amino acid, they vary widely in crystallinity or
solid structure, melting point, and other physical properties.
Preferred nylons for use in this invention are copolymers of hexa-
methylene diamine and adipic acid tnylon 66), copolymers of hexa-
methylene diamine and sebacic acid (nylon 610), and homopolymers of
poly~-caprolactam (nylon 6). Alternatively, these preferred poly-
amide resins have a ratio of methylene (CH2) to amide (NtlCO)
groups within the range about 5:1 to about 8:19 most preferably about
5:1 to about 7:1. Nylon 6 and nylon 66 each have a ratio of 6:1,
whereas nylon 61û has a ratio of 8:1. The nylon polymers are available
in a wide variety of grades, which vary appreciably with respect to
molecular weight, within the range from about IS,OûO to about 42~000
(number average molecular weight) and in other characteristics.
The highly preferred species of the units composing the
polymer chain is potyhexamethylene adipamide, i.e. nylon 66~ and
molecular weights above about 30,ûO0 are preferred. Polymers free
of additives are generally preferred, but the addition of antioxidants
or similar additives may have benefit under some conditions.
Additionally, any of the hydrophilic or hydrophobic type
microporous membranes used in commercially available membranes
~59~
produced by numerous companies7 are potentially suTtable for forminy
into the reinforced larninated microporous filtration membranes of
this invention, for example, Pall Corp.'s ULTIPOR N66 (nylon)~
Millipore's DURAPORE (polyvinylidene fluoride~, Gelman Sciences
Inc.'s METRICEL (esters of ce,lulose, PVC copolymer) TUFFRYN,
TEFLON, VERSAPOR ~acrylic copolymer), Ghia Corp's nylon and
polypropyiene membranes and cellulose acetate/nitrate membranes.
The preferred inner and outer microporous membranes are
produced from nylon by the method disclosed in U.S. Patent No.
3,876,738 to Marinaccio et al. Another rnethod for producing such
membranes is described in European Patent Application No. 0 005 536
to Pall.
Both of these methods for producing nylon microporous
membranes may be described as "quench techniques", i.e. casting or
extruding a solution of a film forming polymer onto a substrate and
quenching the cast film. In the production of the reinforced
laminated membrGne of this invention the inner microporous mem-
brane is Formed on a substrate which is the reinforcing web and the
outer microporous membrane is formed on a substrate which is
nonporous, i~e. a glass plate, stainless steel drum or belt.
Broadly, Marinaccio et al produces microporous mem-
brane by casting or extruding onto a substrate a casting solution of a
film-forming polymer in a solvent system and quenching in a bath
connpr;sed of a nonsolvent system For the polymer. The most
important parameter responsible for development of micropores in
* Trademark
r
i ~ ~
~2~
-17-
the film (e.g. pore size) according to Marinaccio et al, is the solvent
system employed with the polymer and the nonsolvent system used in
quenching the film. The selection of the solvent for the polymer is
determined by the natlJre of the polymer material used ancl can be
empirically determined on the basis of solubility parameters
described in detail in hlarinaccio et al.
The casting solution for forming the preferred nylon
rnicroporous membrane is a nylon polymer in a solvent system for the
poiymer. The solvent system comprises a mixture of at least one
solvent and one nonsolvent for the polymer. The solvents wh;ch can
be used with alcohol soluble nylons include solvents such as lower
alkanols, e.g. methanol, ethanol and butanol, and mixtures thereof. It
is known that nonalcohol soluble nylons will dissolve in solvents of
acids, for example, formic acid, citric acid, acetic acid, maleic qcid
and similar acids. The nylon solutions after formation are diluted
with a nonsolvent for the nylon which is miscible with the nylon
solution. Dilution with non-solvent may, according to Marinaccio et
al, be effected up to the point of incipient precipitation of the nylon.
The nonsolvents are selected on the basis of the nylon solvent
utilized. For example, when water miscible nylon solvents are
employed, water can be the nonsolvent. Generally, the nonsolvent
can be water; methyl formate; aqueous lower alcohols, such as
methanol and ethanol; polyols such as glycerol, glycols9 polyglycols,
and ethers and esters thereof; and mixtures of the aforementioned.
The aforementioned Pall application describes another
similar method which may be used for the conversion of nylon
.. ~.
~ 2~5~
polymer into nylon microporous membrane. Broadly, Pall provides a
process for preparing skinless hydrophilic alcohol-insoluble pol-yamide
resin from a polyamide casting solution. The casting solution is
formed by inducing nucleation of the solution by the controlled
~ddition of a nonsolvent for the polyamide resin to obtain a vi~ible
precipitqte of polyamide resin particles.
The casting solution, e.g. whether that of Marinaccio et al
or ~, is then spread on a substrate, i.e. reinforcing web or non-
porous substrate, to form a thin film thereonO The cast film is then
contacted with a quenching bath comprising q non-solvent system for
the polymer for a time sufficient to form micropores in the film.
The preferred quench bath for forming a nylon microporous mem-
brane comprises a nonsolvent system of methanol and water or
formic acid and water.
These preferred nylon membranes, i.e. described in
Marinaccio et al and Pal 1, are characterized by an isotropic
structure, having a high effective surface area and a fine internal
microstructure of controlled pore dimensions with narrow pore size
distributian and adequate pore volume. For example, a represen-
tative 0.22 micron rated nylon 66 membrane (polyhexamethylene
adipamide) exhibits an Initial Bubble Point (IBP) of about 45 to 5û
psid, a Foam All Over Point (FAOP) of about 50 to 55 psid, provides a
flow of from 7û to 80 ml/min of water ct 5 psid (47 mm. diameter
discs)9 has a surface area (BET9 nitrogen adsorption) of about 13 m 2/g
and q thickness of ~bout 4.5 to 4.75 mils.
~LS~1~6
_ 1 9_
The reinforced laminated filtration membrane of this
invention has as an essential element thereof, a porous reinforcing
web impregnated with a polymeric microporous inner membrane.
Such an impregnated web is preferably producecl, by casting a
sufficient amount of the casting solution onto the porous reinforcing
web to form a web having a co~ting solution thereon. The coated
reinforced web is then contacted with the quenching bath.
The reinforcing web is a porous material which is pre-
ferably wettable by the casting solution to maximize impregnation of
the casting solution during casting and become firmly attached to the
web during precip;tation of the polymeric membrane, e.g. nylon. It
is not essential, however, that the web be wettable by the casting
solution. If the web is not wettable, the casting solution co~ting will
be largely confined to the surface of the web but is nonetheless
adherant thereto due to impregnation of the solution into the web and
adhesion of the membrane to the web.
Such wettable and nonwettable reinforcing webs can, for
example, be made of nonwoven textiles and cloth, as well as netting
of various types, including extruded plastic filament netting, papers
and similar materials. Reinforcing webs which are non-wettable by
the casting solution may be fine-pored non-woven webs made from
fibers such as, polypropylene or polyethylene. Suitable wettable
reinforcing webs include: polyesters, as nonwoven fibrous webs or
woven webs, using monofilQments or multifilament yarn, the mono-
filaments being preferred in terms of open structure and lower
pressure drops; polyamide fiber woven webs, woven and nonwoven
~IL2~S~
-20-
webs of aromatic polyamides, and other relatively polar fibrous
products such as cellulose~ regenerated cellulose, cellulose esters,
cellulose ethers9 glass fiber, and similar materials. Cellulosic and
synthetic fiber filter papers may also be used as the reinforcing web
as well as perforated plastic sheets and open mesh expanded plastics.
If the substrate is relatively coarse or in a very open weave
structure9 even if the fibers are not substantially wetted by the resin
solution, the substrate may nonetheless be impregnated by the
membrane material. Thus such non-wettable materials such as
polypropylene and polyethylene can be impregnated by the membrane
if they have a sufficiently open structure.
More specifically, a preferred reinforcing fiber is a poly-
ester spun bonded non-woven web trademark REEMAY (Grade 2250~
from Du Pont. Other specific reinforcing webs are polyester webs
such as F<EEMAY Grades 2 1 05 and 2 111 , Eaton Dikemann Corp's
HOLLYTE Grades 3251, 3252 and 3257; and polypropylene webs
such as HOLLYTEX Grades 6û01 and 6003, Kendal I Corp's
NOVONETTE Grade SP-160.15, Crown Zellerbach's .75 oz / sq. yd.,
$
I<endall's WEBRIL M1103, and Lutravil Sales Co.'s LUTRASIL 5015,
5020 and 5û30.
A preferred manner of making the impregnated rein-
forcing web is by casting a sufficient amount of the casting solution
onto the porous reinforcing web to form a web having a coating
solution thereon. This coating solution is then calendered, i.e.
pressed, preferably by rollers, into the web under conditions of
temperature, pressure and time sufficient to reduce the viscosity of
.
lZ~aS~6
-2 1 -
the coating solution sufficiently to ensure enhancecl penetration of
the coating solution into the web and to remove substantiqlly all
entrapped air therefrom to thus form a coated web. Such conditions
of temperaturet pressure and time are highly dependant on the type
reinforcing web utilized, the casting solution, type rollers etc. Such
conditions can be readily determined by one skilled in the art by
noting the penetration of the solution into the web, and pin holes and
bubbles in the final coating. The thus coated web is then
subsequently treated by casting a sufficient amount of casting
solution thereon to form a coated web having an additional coating
solution thereon. This so coated web is then quenched in a quenching
bath to form the impregnated web to which the outer membranes are
then subsequently laminated.
A preferred apparatus for producing such an impregnated
reinforcing web is shown in the FIGURE of this specification. In the
apparatus depicted a reinforcing web (lû) is fed by suitable means
between calendering rollers (12 & 14). Surrounding the reinforcing
web (10) above the calendering rollers (12 &14) is first reservoir ~16)
containing casting solution which continuously contacts the rein-
forcing web (lû) and is continuously cqlendered into the web by rollers
(12 & 14)o Feed pipes (18) feed casting solution into reservoir ~16) to
insure that the web (lû) is surrounded with a sufficient quantity of
casting solution. Adjusting screws (2û) adjust the calendering
pressure exerted by rollers (12 & 14) against web (lû).
The thus coated web (10~ then passes through a second
reservoir (21) preferably containing the same casting solution as
~235~
reservoir (16). Feed pipe (22) feeds casting solution into reservoir 121)
to insure that the web (10) is surrounded with a sufFicient quantity of
casting solution. Guide bar (24) guides web (10) so that it conforms to
the contour of casting drum ~26). Guide bar (24) may be adjusted by
adjusting screw (28). The casting solution coats web (lû) which then
passes under casting blade (30). The thickness of the coating on web
(lû) may be adjusted by moving casting blade (30) toward or away
from casting drum (26~ by calibrated push-pull screw (32). The so
coated web then passes through reservoir (34) containing a quench
bath which solidifies the polymer to form micropores in the coating
to thus form the impregnated web.
The preferred manner of utilizing the aforementioned
apparutus for producing the preferred impregnated reinforcing web is
as follows:
Preliminar~g~the Calendering Rollers (!2 & 14).
The calendering rollers (12 & 14) are spaced to provide a
slip fit for the reinforcing web (10). Thus, they are typically opened
to an approximately 1/2 mil greoter gap thun the web thickness. The
web (10) is passed through the rollers (12 & 14) to insure that no
noticeable drag occurs at any point across the width of the rollers (12
& 14). It is desirable not to squeeze the web (10) with the rollers (12
& 14) at this point, since any non-synchronous speed v~riations
between the driven calendering rollers (12 & 14~ and the rotating
casting drum (26) will cause the web (10) to either develop slack or
excess tension between these two points. A sl ip f it between the
rollers (12 & 14) insures that the drum (26) alone will control web
~l2~5S~
speed. It is also desirable to spnce the rollers (12 & 14) at a minirnum
gap for such slip fit, in order to maximize the calendering action by
the rollers to the castina solution and to inswre that no excessive
amount of casting solu~ion is being c~rried from first reservoir (16~
into second reservoir (2i), resulting in an uncontrollecl increase in the
level in reservoir (21)~ Adjustment of the calendering roller gap is
effected by the adjustment of the roller axle supports (not shown in
FIGURE) and the ~djusting screws (20).
Pre!iminary Setting of Guide Bar (24)
The guide bar [24) spacing above the casting drurn (26)
must be set evenly across the web (lû). It is normally set with a bar
(24) to drum (26) spacing equal to the nominal thickness of the web.
At this setting, a slight amount of dray is noticed when the loose web
mGterial is pulled between the bar (24) and drum (26~ with the drum
(26) not rotating. It is desirable to keep this gap at a minimum, as
experience with this system has shown that a smclll increase in the
gap causes a large chan~e in the drum side casting solution coating
thickness on the web. Even at the minimum clearance setting, a
continuousy discrete drum side coating of membrane is effected.
Preliminary Settina~ of the Castin~ Blade (30)
The cqsting blade (3û) has its depth adjusted by calibrated
push-pull screws (32). This blade (3û) controls (a) the overall
thickness of the impregnated reinforcing web, and ~b) the thickness of
the top (quench side) coating of the casting solution on the web. It is
typically set with a blade (3û~ to drum ~26) gap which is several mils
thicker than the nominal web thickness to insure enough free space
~L2~LS~
-24-
for the excess quench side and drum side casting solution to pass
through. When in opercltion, the web (10) is typically bordered on both
edges with an approximately 1" ~2.54 cm) wide bead of membrane.
The most accurcte control of the thickness of the impregnated
reinforcing web is achieved by monitoring the thickness of this bead
for it is insensitive to fluctuations in web thickness7 Bead thickness
is controlled by screws (32) which adjusts the blade gqp.
5ta t-up and Operation of the Web Impre~nating Apparatus
The web impregnqting apparatus is started and operated
in the follow;ng manner. The lead edge of the roll of reinforcing
web, with appropriate back tension applied, is fed in a straight
vertical manner into the apparqtus. The web pqsses between the
calendering rollers (12 & 14) underneath the guide bar (24) ~nd under
the casting blade ~3û). The web is further fed around the drum (26)
and out of the quench b~th reservoir (34) through rinsing zones (not
shown) to a roll t~ke-up (not shown). The reservoir (34) is then filled
with quench bath composition to ~ level about 1/21' (1.27 cm) under the
casting bl~de (30), such that no quench bath fluid penetrates into
reservoir (21). The casting drum (26) qnd calendering rollers (12 &
14) are then rotated to feed the web (lû) through the qpparatus to the
take-up system after the rinse zones. Web tension exiting the quench
zone reservoir (34) qnd running through the rinse zone to the take-up
should be about 5 Ibs across the width of the web. Once smooth and
synchronous running is assured, casting solution is fed into the
calendering roller reservoir (16). When reservoir (16) is filled, the
same casting solution is then fed into second reservoir (21). A
5~
continuous irnpregnation and coating of the web is observed below the
casting blade (30). At this time, the level of the quenching bath
reservoir (34) is raised to a point approximately 1/2" above the level
defined by the point of web (10) passing under the casting blade (30)
bringing the system to the preferred "zero quench" condition.
Without this "zero quench" condition ripple imperfections are noted
to occur transversely across the web ~t regular intervals.
After about 180O of arc travel on the drum (26) the web
(lû) is allowed to peel off of the drum (26) and enter into the rinsing
tank. During start-up operations the impregnated reinforcing web is
checked for the following:
I) Membrane bead thickness and uniformity.
Il) Binding and stalling of the web.
111~ Smoothness and continuity of the drum sidecoating.
IV) Smoothness and continuity of the quench side
coating.
1. With the preferred apparatus9 shown in the FIGURE,
wet nylon membrane bead thickness was found to relate to overall
impregnated web dry sheet thickness. For example, the impregnated
web produced in Example XX showed the following relationship:
Wet Bead Thickness Dry Impregnated
(mils) Web Thickness (mils)
4.5 4.07
5.7 4.47
6.8 4.70
8.0 5.15
Thus the dry impregnated web thickness may be monitored
by measuring the wet bead thickness.
~LZ~5~
-26-
I i. Binding and stal ling of the web may occur at two
places, these being the nip of the calendering rollers (12 ~ 14) and
the nip of the guide bar (24) and drum (26). Such bindiny most often
occurs at the guide bar and drum nip and will require an upwurds
cdjustment of the guide bar (24) to increase the bar to drum yap.
111. Smoothness and continuity of the drum side coating
indicates that an adequate amount of casting solution has been
deposited on the drum side of the web, that the quench bath is
diffusing through the whole structure to completely congeal the
casting solution before its removal from the drum (26), and that the
proper drum surface speed has been chosen for the particular casting
solution, web and impregnated web thickness chosen. A common
imperfection on the drum side coating is a roughness c~used by
unquenched pockets of casting solution being pulled off of the drum
at the release point. These rough areas are f ibrous, stringy
elongations of casting solution which quench as it ;s pulled through
the quenching medium. This condition may be eliminated by several
adjustments, these include:
a) decreasing the overall thickness of the we~ coating
at the casting blade (30); and/or
b) lowering the guide bar (24) closer to the drum (26)
to decrease the drum side coating thickness; and/or
c) decreasing the running speed of the casting9
resulting in a longer casting drum residence time.
IV. Smoothness and continuity of the quench side coqting
indicates that an adequate amount of casting solution is wel I
~2~S~OE;
positioned between the drum surface and the ~uench bath, and thut
the guide bar to drum gap is not so great as to favor a heavy drum
side coating to the exclusion of the quench side coating.
The latter conditinn is a commvnly encountered problem
for the guide bar (24) has proven to be very sensitive, i.e. and easily
jarred from its preliminary setting~ Should the gap become too great,
a condition of quench side "terry clothing" becomes evident. This
condition occurs because an excessive layer of casting solution is
collected underneath the web on the drum side ~usually caused by
virtue of too large a gap between the guide bar and drum) which
develops a high fluid pressure underneath the web at the web's point
of contact with the casting blade (30). This pressure forces the web
to form a nip ~t the blade (30~ through which a quench side coating
cannot pass. The pressure is then relieved after the web passes into
the quench bath fluid, by flowing through the tightly drawn web from
the high pressure drum side to the low pressure quench side. This
pressure differential cnuses the casting solution to move in an uneven
fashion through the web by virtue of the non-uniformity of the web's
porosity. This creates hills and valleys of casting solution on the
quench side of the web, resulting in a material with a surface texture
much like terry cloth.
The "terry clothing" condition moy be eliminated in two
ways: (a) with heavy terry clothing it is necessary to decrease the gap
between the guide bar and the drum; and ~b) with light terry clothing,
it is sometimes possible to simply increase the overall thickness of
the coating at the casting blade (30). This relieves the pressure
~L%~5~
~ 2~--
differential on the drum side of the coating. This method may be the
only recourse against terry clothing when the guide bar gap is so tight
as to border on binding and stalling the web at this nip.
The casting solution levels in the reservoirs (16 & 21) are
independently controlled and require maintenance of constqnt levels.
The second reservoir (21) is ideally ut a constant level throughout
operation. Provisions are made to insure an equal head of casting
solution on the drum side and quench side of the web. Reservoir (16)
has provisions for the same control, however, excellent results have
been obtained using unequal levels of ccsting solution for the quench
side and drum side of the web.
The foregoing procedure and apparatus for forming the
impregnated web substantially eliminates air bubbles, insures com-
plete and uniform impregnation of the web with casting solution and
eliminates substantial deviations in impregnation of the web regard-
less of the degree to which the web can be wetted by the casting
solution.
The formation of the outer microporous membranes can be
accomplished by any of the recognized methods familiar to the art.
The preferred method is casting on a non-porous substrate vsing a
knife edge or doctor blade which controls the thickness of the cast
film. In general9 the films will be cast at thicknesses in the range of
from about I mil to about 20 mils, preferably from about I to about 10
mils (wet thickness). After the polymer solution is cast and
quenched, the outer membrane is removed from the quench bath and
substrate upon which it was cast. After the impregnated web and
outer microporous membranes have been formed they are then
washed.
-29-
The washed outer mernbranes are then laminated to
the washed irnpregnated web by methods well known in -the art,
preferably by passing the -three layers juxtaposed upon each
other through heated r.ollers to heat laminate and dry the
outer mernbranes to the impregnated web. Pre-Ferably such drying
is under restraint to prevent shrinkage. Drying of the n~lnbranes
under restraint is described in the Assignee's U..S. Defensive
Disclosure published under No. T 103601 to Repetti. Generally,
any suitable restraining technique may be used while drying,
such as winding the laminated membrane tightly about a drying
surface, e.g. a drum. Biaxial control is preferred and tensioning
the laminated mernbrane on a stretching frame is considered
the most preferred. Preferably, the restraint imposed affects
no reduction in dimensions. The final dLying and curing tempera-
ture for the reinforced laminated filtration membrane should
be sufficient to dry and cure the mer~branes. Preferably this
temperature is from about 120 C to 140 C for minimization
of drying times without embrittlement or other detrimental
affects to the me~branes. The total thickness of the reinforced
laminated filtration membrane of this invention is preferably
from about 3 mils to about 30 mils and most preferably 3bout
5 to 15 mils thick ~dry thickness).
A critical requirement of this in~ention is that
the pore size of the irmer membrane be greater than the pore
size of the outer mernbranes. This relationship may be
determined for the same type microporous mernbranes by
in~uring that ~he Initial Bubble Point (IBP) ~
~ ,, .
~z~s~
-~o-
of the inner membr~ne is less than the IBP of the outer mernbranes.
ASTM F316-7~ describe the melhods by which the IBP i5 determined
and the calculation of pore size for a membrane.
Such a relationship between the pore size of the inner and
ovter membrGnes increases the f low rate through the reinforced
membrane (for a constant differential pressure) in an unexpected
mcmner. Preferably, the ratio of the pore size of the inner membrane
to the outer membranes is from about 1.5:1 to about 6:! for maxi-
mization of flow rate and bonding between layers. Higher ratios can
be used, however such ratios will have a minimal effect on ~low rate.
Under the same conditions, for the same type membranes this usually
means that the ratio of the IBP of the inner membrane to IBP of the
outer membranes is about 1:1.2 to i:6. Typically, this means that the
outer rnembranes have a pore size of about .2 microns to about .85
microns ond the inner membrane from about .45 microns to about 2.0
microns. A preferred laminatèd membrane has outer membranes of
about .2û microns and an inner membrane of about .65 microns.
Another preferred laminated membrane has outer membranes of
about .45 microns and an inner membrane of about .85 micronsO
Preferably, both outer membranes are of the same pore size although
this is not necessary to achieve most of the benefits of this invention.
The reinforced laminated filtrcltion rnembrane may be
rolled and stored for use under ambient conditions. It will be
understood that the reinforced membrane may be formed into any of
the usual commercial forms~ for example~ discs or pleated cartridges
.~.....
~z~s~
-31-
For so-called sterile filtrations involving biological
liquids, the reinforced laminated filtration membrane is
sanitized or sterilized by àutoclaving or hot water flushing
The reinforced membrane of this invention is resistc~nt to
this type treatment, and retains its integrity in use un~er
such conditions.
The reinforced membrane additionally is easy to
handle and readily formed into convoluted structures, e.g.
pleasted configuration. By reason of its retained flow charac-
teristics it may be employed directly in existing installations,
without pumping modifications.
After formation of the reinforced laminated filtration
membrane of this invention it may be treated in accordance
with U.S. Patent No. 4~473/474 to Ostreicher et al to produce
a cationically charge modified microporous membrane par-ticularly
suitable for the filtration of parenteral or biological liquids;
or in accordance with U.S. Patent No. 4r473~ 475 to Barnes
et al to produce another -type cationically charge modified
microporous membrane particularly suitable for the filtration
of high purity water, i.e. at least lr3 megohm-cm resistivity,
required in the m~nufacture of electronic components.
The reinforced laminated filtration membrane of
this invention is characteri2ed by unexpectedly high flow
rates for a given differential pressure and also characterized
by, durability, strength, uniformity, lack of pin-holes
and bubble defects. The preferred - - -
.~,. ,~.
~z~s~
-32-
membranes may be used with either side of the membrane facing
upstream.
Hoving now gener~l Iy described this invention, 'rhe
invention will become better understood by reference to specific
exomples. These examples are included herein for the purposes of
illustration only and ore not intended to be limiting of the invention,
unless so specified.
~L2~L5~
EXAMPLES
The followiny are the rneasurernent and test procedures
utilized in all the Examples.
Thickn~ss
The dry membrane thickness was measured with a 1/2 inch
(1.27 cm) diameter pl~ten diat indicator thickness gauge. Gauge
accuracy was + 0.00005 inches ~+ .05 mils).
Initial Bubble Point tlBP) cnd Foam-AII-Over
Psint (FAOP) Tes~s
A 47 mm diameter disc of the membrane sample is placed
in a special test holder which seals the edge of the disc. Above the
membrane and directly in contact with its upper f~ce, is a perforated
stainless steel support screen which prevents the membrane from
deforming or rupturing when air pressure is applied to its bottom
face. Above the membrane and support screen, the holder provides
an inch deep cavity into which distilled water is introduced. A
regulated air pressure is increased until a first stream of air bubbles
is emitted by the water wetted membrane into the quiescent pool of
water. The air pressure at which this first stream of a;r bubbles is
emitted is c~lled the Initial Bubble Point ~IBP) - see ASTM F316-70.
Once the Initial Bubble Point pressure has been
determined and recorded, the air pressure is further increased until
the ~ir flow thru the wetted rnembrane sample, as measured by a
flow meter in the line between the regulator and the sample holder,
reaches lû0 cc/min. The air pressure at this flow rate, is called
Foam-AII-Over-Point (FAOP).
~s~
-34-
Flow Rt~te Test
A 47 mm diameter disc of the membrane sample is placed
in a testing housing which allows pressurized water to flow thru the
membrane. Prefiltered water is passed thru the membrane sample at
a pressure differential of 5 psid. A graduated cylinder is used to
measure the volume of water passed by the membrane sample in a
one minute period.
-35-
EXAMPLE I
PREPAF~TION OF OUTER MICROPOROUS MEME~RANES
A representative nylon 66 membrane having a nominal
suface area of about i3 m2/g and a nominal pore size rating of 0.2
microns was prepared by the method of Marinaccio et al, U.S. Pa7ent
No. 3,876,738, utilizing:
I) a casting solution of approximately 16 percent by
weight nylon 66 (Monsanto Vydyne 66B), and the proper
mixture of solvent formic acid and non-solvent methanol
(see Table 1) to produce the desired minimum Initiai
Bubble Point of 42 psi, at the necessary dope mixing
temperature, time, pressure, etc. (as required by the
method of Mnrinaccio);
2) a quench bath composition of 3û% methanol9 2.0%
formic acid and 68% water by weight (regenerated as
required by the method of Knight et al, U.S. Patent No.
3,928,517);
3) a casting speed of 96 inches/min on a 30" diameter
casting drum; and
4) a quench bath temperature of 230C.
The membrane was produced by casting the casting
solution onto the drum just under the surface of the quench bath
approximately 4.5 mils thick as c~st wet, to obtain a dry single layer
of approximately 2.5 mils. thick. Th~ membrane was allowed to
separate from the drum at about 180 of arc from the point of
application and was guided out of the quench bath and into a series of
S~Z~5~0~;
high pvrity water rinsing zones. The wet membrane was then siit
from the cast 40" width down to two 15" widths, and taken up on
separate hollow cores in lengths of 200 feet. These outer membrane
layers may be stored wet in this fashion for several days before
subsequent processing. The Membrane Characteristics for these
layers are obtained after drying a double-layered sample of this
membrane under restraint conditions as required by the method of
Repetti, u.s. Defensive Disclosure T 103601.
~1 .
TABLE I
Cast;ng Solution C:omposition
Nylon 16.06 wt~ %
Formic Acid 77.01 wt. %
Meth~nol 6.93 wt. %
Cast~ Solution Mix~ng Conditions
Temper2ture 300C
Time 5 hrs.
Pressure psig 1~0 psig
Membrane Characteristics
iBP FAOP THICKNESS Q
(psi) . (psi) (mils) (cc!min.)
42.3 5 1 .~ 5.388 1 .3
-38-
XAMPLE 11
PREPARATlOl`i OF OUTER MICROPOROUS MEMBRANES
A representative nylon 66 membrane hcving a nominal
surface pore size rating of 0.45 microns was prepqred by the same
method described in Exampie lo Ch~nges in the casting solution
composition and mixlng conditions are noted in the Table 11.
-
~Z15~
-39-
TABLE 11
_ sting Solution Co m~sition
Nylon 16.15 wt. %
Formic Aoid 77.~5 wt. %
Methanol 6.40 wt. %
Costin~ Solution Mix ng Conditions
Temperature 300C
Time 5.0
Pressure- psig 1.0 psig
Mernbr~ne Char~cteristics
IBP FA ~P T HIC K NESS Q
~psi) ~ mils) (cc/min.)
29.7 34 5.83 170
~ z~s~
-40-
EXAMPLE 1!~
PREPA~ ~A~IES
A representative nylon 66 membrane having a nominal
pore size rating of 0.65 rnicrons was prepared by the same method
described in Example 1, except that the membrane was produced at a
casting surface speed of 30 inches/min, on a casting drum of 12.5
inch diameterO The wet thickness o~ a sheet was 5O5 mils. Changes
in the casting solution composition and mixing conditions are noted in
the Table 111.
~5~6
-4 1 -
TABLE 111
Cas~in~ Solution C:omposition
Nylon 16.00 wt. %
Formic Acid 78.04 wt. %
Methanol 5.96 wt. %
C~sting Solution Mixin~ Conditions
Temperature 300C
Time 3 hrs.
Pressure- psig O.û
Membrane Characteristics
IBP FAOP THICKNESS Q
mils) (cc!min.)
i 6.0 19.5 3.90 620
.. ~
~ZlS5~6
-42-
~a~
PREPARATION OF IMPREGNATED WEB
E~CAMPLE IV
A representative nylon 66 impregnated web with a
microporous membrane having a nominal pore size rating of about .65
microns was produced with a reinforcing web of DuPont Corporation's
REEMAY 2250 polyester spunbonded non-woven (nominal web
thickness of 3.5 nils; sheet weight olF .50 Z/sg. yd., fibier denier of
2.2 and Frazier air flow* of 1100) by the preferred methods and
apparatvs described herein. A casting solution was prepared in the
same manner as described in Example 111.
During the preparation of the impregnated web, the guide
bar gap was slightly less than 3.0 mils, the membrane edge bead
thickness w~s maintained at 5.5 mils and a casting rate of 3û inches
per minute was usedO Several 150 foot rolls of this material were
collected. Performance clata on a single layer of this material
prepared under restrained drying conditions, i.e. see Repetti, is given
in Table IV. Performancs data of this casfing solut;on cast as a
nonreinforced membrane is also included as control data.
*Frazier Air FIQW determined by ASTM D--737-75.
i. . ~.. .
-43-
ln a manner similar to Example IV other type impregnated
webs were produced using the casting solution of Example 111.
Performance data is given in Table IV.
EXAMPLE V.
Reinforcing web: Eaton Dikeman Corp.
HOLLYTEX 3257
Type: Polyester spunbonded and calendered nonwoven
Nominal Web Thickness: 3.0 mils
Sheet weight: I.û0 oz/sq. yd.
Fiber denier: 2.2
Frazier Air Flow: 300
Membrane bead thickness: 5,0 mils
Surface Speed: 30 inches/min.
EXAMPLE Vl
Reinforcing Web: Faton Dikeman Corp.
HOLLYTEX 3251
Type: Polyester spunbonded and caiendered nonwoven
Nominal Web Thickness: 2.0 mils.
Sheet weight: .50 oz/sq. yard
Fiber denier: 2.2
Frazier Air Flow: 540
Membrane Bead Thickness: 4.0 mils
Surface Speed: 18 inches/min.
~s~
-4~-
EXAMPLE V!l
Reinforcing web: Lutravil Sales Co. LUTRASIL 5020
Type~ Polypropylene spunbonded and thermally
point bonded non-woven
Nominal web thickness: 6.5 mils
Sheet weight: .59 Z/sq.yd.
Fiber denier: 1.75
Frazier Air Flow: 981
Membrane bead thickness: 7.0 mils wet
Surface speed: 12 inches/min.
EXAMPLE Vlll
Reinforcing web: Lutravil Sales Co. LUTRASIL 5015
Type: Polypropylene spunbonded and thermally
point bonded non-woven
Nominal Web Thickness: 4.8 mi Is
Sheet weight .44 oz/sq.yd.
Fiber denier 1.75
Fra ier Air Flow 912
Membrane bead thickness: 5.5 mils
Surface speed: 15 inches/min.
. .
t36
-45-
EXAMPLE IX
Reinforcing web: Eaton Dikeman Co. HOLLYTEX 6001
Type: Polypropylene spunbonded, thermally point
bonded and cqlendered non-woven
l~lominal Web Thickness: 2.5 mils
Sheet weight .88 oz/sq.yd.
Fiber denier 1.75
Frazier uir flow 205
Membrane Bead Thickness~ 5.5 mils
Surface speed: 12 inches/min.
z~
x s ~ < < < x
-- ~
~D
n r 11 ;~ r r 3: 1
~ -< D D ~ ~ :t~ ~
O x r r x X ,~, tD
O~ o O ~ ~ ~
C o -- ~ ~ ~ o
0. ~ ~ O ~n ~
o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~
~ _ _ ~ _
o .` ` ~ D ~ ~ 3
o ~ ~ ;~
.- (D r Z
~ 0
0 a~ CO 3 s o
3 u O m ~ ~
o ~ ~ ~
~D Z
3 t~)
o ~ ~ W ~
0 ~ ~'
~,
~ ~ 3
~o ~ ~n ~J7 ~_1
o ~ 3. ~r r~
~D _~ ,
tD
cr
~J7 $' ~ CO ~ --Tl
CO 1::- ~ ~ ~
, ;~
_~
~D
.... .
.
~ -
~2 5~
-47-
EXAMPLES X TO XY
RElhlFC)RCED LAMINATED FILTRATION MEMBRANE
Representative reinforced laminated filtration
membranes of the present invention were made by laminating the
impregnated web of Examples IV to IX to outer microporous
membrunes of û.2 micron rating, such as the material described in
Example 1. In ecch case, a first outer microporous membrane was
brought into contact with the impregnated web in such a manner as
to provide a soaking wet contqct line at the union of the two layers.
A second outer microporous membrane was laid onto the opposite
surface of the ;mpregnated web in a similar manner, using
appropriate spreader rollers and idler rollers. Both the impregnated
web and the two outer microporous membrane layers remqined wet
from the cast-quench-rinse process, and had not taken any manner of
thermal set before such lam;nation. The triple~ yer laminated
membrane then proceeded into the drying zone, which was a teflon
coated steel drum equipped with edge restraining belts on both sides
of the laminated membrane and infrared radient heatçrs spaced at
intervals over the drum circurnference. The laminate was laid onto
the drum surface and under the restraining belts which are arranged
to cover approximately 200 of arc over the three foot diameter
drum This arrangement al lowed the laminate to dry and bond
between layers under two dimensional restraining conditions, i.e.,
restricted stretching and contraction motion in the machine direction
by sheet tension control and restricted contraction control in the web
. ,
-
~15~
-4~-
cross direction by sheet edge restraint. The bank of infrarecl heaters
(S heaters, 15 inches effective width, 650 Watts per unit) was run at
maximum power with the parabolic mirrored heating elements spaced
approximately two inches from the web and drum, and a spacing of at
least seven inches between each element and its neighboring element.
Drum surface speed was varied between 10 and 18 inches per minute
as required to bring the material to as near to 0% moisture as such an
arrangement would allow. This laminate was rolled up in a "bone dry"
condition. This condition was evidenced by the heavy static charge
generated as the material peeled off the drum at a point past the
infrared heater banks and past the release point of the edge
restraining belts. This material was wound onto a hollow core for
storage, and sampled for membrane performance characteristics
listed in Table V. Also listed in Table V, for comparqtive purposes, is
the performance characteristics of the two outer layers laminated
to_ether without reinforcement. This material was then treated with
cation;c charae modifier pursuant to Ostreicher et al or Barnes et al
with no significant changes from the performance data indicated in
Table V.
- ~z~s~
XX X X X X rr
-- = -- ~
~D
r~ ~ r r rn Iv
r ;C 1I r r ~:
~ D D ~ ~ :D Y
~ I ~ ~ u
X r r X X ~ tD ~
t~ O ~ ~ o Z
1~ w ;~1
r ~r~,
~cr ~Z
~D ~D
~n~ ~~n __.1
~ ~ o 3 ~ , tn.
co ~ o _. _ ~3
co o c~
D
~ ~ o C~ ~ ~W ~ ~
~I W ~ 0 ~D
.o ~ .~ ~ ` o ~ 1 3
u~
o ~ ~ 1~ ~
1- ;D
~D
~5~
-50-
Table V indicates ihat the reinforced laminate of this
invention has substantially the same flow as a non-
reinforced double laminate having ~he same outer
membranes.
~s~
-5 1 -
EXAMPLES XVI TO XIX
RE NFORCED LAMINATE:D FILTF~TION MEMBRANE
Representative reinforced lam;nated filtration
membranes of the present invention were mude by laminating the
impregnated web of Examples IV, Vll, Vlll and IX to outer
microporous membrane roll stock of 0.45 micron r~ting, such as the
material detailed in Example 11. Laminations and drying procedures
~ollowed the method of Examples X to XV. The reinforced laminated
membrane performance dqta is listed in Table V19 as wel I as the
double layer non-reinforced outer layer control data.
x X X X Im
tD
I C r 11
~ D D ~
X ~" ~ r Z
r~ r~ v L~ ~ ;O
`o `o ~ ~ 1
r r
~, 3,g 3
`'O ~ ~Z,
n ~ 0
-- ~ ~D
c" ~ 3
O O a~ ~v 1~ ~ ~ c~ Z ¦' r
l~Q 3
D
rn
P
~ ~ ~ r~ ~--
w r~ ~ ~n w 3
~D 3
~O OD ~ ~ ~ D ~ Z
_o o ~
v~ ~v ~ o ~ . 3 6
tD _,
~n
` r~ ~ ~ o
3.~
~D
- ~Z~S~6
EXAMPLE XX
COMPARATIYE EXAMPLE
A casting solution containing 13 wt. % solids (of nylon)
was prepared by the method of Example I to produce a membrane
having a substantially higher than normal IBP w;th the expectation
that the casting solution would display a decreased membrane IBP
when cast into a reinforcina web.
It has been noted that in preparing impregnated webs of
pore sizes less than 0.65 micron and with greater than, say, 20 psi
Initial Bubble Point, q bubble point depression is noticed between the
membrane alone and the impregnated web. That is, the IBP of an
impregnated web is consistently lower than the IBP of a non
reinforced membrane cast from the same casting solution when the
casting solution is of such character as to produce 0.2 and 0.45
micron membranes. This phenomena is not noticed with 0.65 micron
membrane-producing casting solutions. It is necessary, then, to
` formulate a casting solution with a substantially higher IE~P
characteristic than 45 psi in order to obtain 0.2 micron rated
impregnated webs. Although not extensively studied, we have been
able to predict bubble point depressions for given impregnated web.
The casting solution was then cast as a membrane in the
same fashion as Example I to obtain control data, which is noted in
the Table Vll.
~z~s~
~54-
!mpregnated webs having a nominal pore size rating of 0.2
microns was prepared from this casting solution hy the methods and
apparatus of the present invention. The reinforced web was a
calendered non-woven polyester spunbonded scrim, Eaton Dikemann
CorpO's product HOLLYTEX 3257, hqving a nominal sheet thickness of
3.0 mils~ sheet weight of 1.00 oz/sq. yd., fiber denier of 2.2 and
Frazier air flow of 300. The web was slit to 12 3/4" width on a 6û0
ft. roll and mounted over the casting apparatus of Fig. 1. The
braking force on the feed wqs sufficient to provide a sheet back-
tension of 2.0 Ibs~ across the web.
In the present Example, the aforementioned Procedures
for Preliminary Settings and Start-Up were followed. The only
adjustments made to the settings in the course of the run were to
decrease the speed from 30 inches/min to 24 inches/min when the
bead thickness was increased from 5.7 to 6.8 mils wet.
The data in Table Vlll was obtained when the casting
solution described in Table Vll was used to impregnate the
HOLLYTEX 3257 web. The resulting impregnated web was dried in a
restrained condition in a single layer. Double layered material is
shown in Table IX. For comparative purposes the dry double layer
Pall pharmaceutical cartridge's polyester reinforced û.2 micron nylon
membrane data is included in Table Vlll and IX.
-
~z~s~
-55-
TA BLE Vll
CC)N-rROL DATA
Costing Soiution Composition
Nylon 13 wt. %
Formic Acid 78.70 wt. %
Methanol 8.30 wt. %
5~59~,~
Temperature 30C
Time- hrs. 3
Pressure 0.0 psig
Membrane Charac~eristics
IBP FAOP THICK Q
(psi) ~psi3 (mi Is) (cc/min.)
Dry single layer 61.3 76.7 3.07 41.3
Dry~laminated double layer 72 85.7 5.63 18.3
;2~5~
-56-
TABLE Vl l l
Im~egnuted Web Singl0 Layer
Impregnated Wet Membr~ne Dry Single Layer Characteristics
Web Bead Thickness IBP FAOP Thickness Q
(mi!s) _ (psi) (psi) (mils) (cc/min)
A 4.5 28.3 44 4.07 81.7
B 5.7 34.7 52.3 4.47 79.7
C 6.8 31.7 63.3 4O7 63.6
D 8.0 43.7 72 5.15 44.7
When the same impregnated webs ~A-D) were dry-laminated as double
layers~ the following data was obtained:
TABLE IX
Impre~nated Web Double Laye!
Impregnated Dry Double Layer Characteristics
Web IBP FAOPThickness Q
(psi) (psi)(mi Is) (cc/min.)
A 43.3 55.7 7.72 47.3
B 44.3 62.7 8.4 40
C 52.7 66.7 9.43 34
1~) 57.7 72 9.4 29.7
Pall Corp. double 48.8 53.1 11.63 35.8
layer reinforced
~2~S~6
-57-
TABLE X
Nonreinforced Double Layer
IBP FAOP Thickness Q
Sam~e _ (psi) tPSi)(mils) (cc/min.)
.
AMF Cuno ZETAPOR ~P
Double-layer Membrane
nonreinforced 45.2 - 5.09 91.9
Pall Double Layer
Membrane, non-
reinforced 45.9 55.1 5.32 94.7
Of particular importance to this invention is the
comparatively low flow rates of the traditional type of 0.2 micron
rated polyester-reinforced nylon mernbrane exemplified by the Pall
Double Layer reinforced material and the present invention's double
layer reinforced material as typified in Table IX. For a given Initial
Bubble Point that would be considered a sterilizing grade, i.e. 45 psi,
flow rates of non-reinforced nylon membranes are more than double
the flow rates of these reinforced materials.
58-
Additionally, when comparing, for example, a .2 micron
rated, laminated filtration membrane of this invention (exemplified
by Examples X-XV) with the foregoing comparative data (Table Vll-
X) one can see that for substantially the same micron rating, i~e. IBP,
the filtration membrane of this invention (a) permits flow rates
greater than thnt of a single layer of impregnoted reinforcing web,
(b) permits flow rates substantially greater than double layered
impregnated reinforcing web and (c) permits f low rates about
equivalent to double layered non-reinforced membrance.
