Language selection

Search

Patent 1237073 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1237073
(21) Application Number: 1237073
(54) English Title: TOXINS AND ANTIBODIES OF C.DIFFICILE
(54) French Title: TOXINES ET ANTICORPS DE C. DIFFICILE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01N 33/544 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WILKINS, TRACY D. (United States of America)
  • LYERLY, DAVID M. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1988-05-24
(22) Filed Date: 1984-02-29
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


TOXINS AND ANTIBODIES OF C. DIFFICILE
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Mono-specific antibodies for each of toxin A and toxin B of C. difficle are
produced and used in an assay for toxin A and toxin B, respectively. Purified toxin A
of C. difficile is also produced.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS.
1. A composition, comprising:
a solid support sensitized with an antibody specific
for toxins of C. difficile.
2. A composition, comprising:
a solid support sensitized with a mono-specific antibody
for toxin A of C. difficile.
3. A composition, comprising:
a solid support sensitized with a mono-specific antibody
for toxin B of C. difficile.
4. In an assay for toxin A of C. difficile wherein an
analyte containing toxin A is contacted with an antibody,
the improvement comprising:
contacting said analyte with mono-specific antibody for
toxin A of C. difficile to bind only toxin A to said mono-
specific antibody.
5. The process of Claim 4 wherein in the assay antibody
to C. difficile is supported on a solid support, the supported
C. difficile antibody is contacted with analyte to bind
C. difficile antigen to the supported C. difficile antibody
and subsequently the bound antigen is contacted with mono-
specific antibody in a labelled form and the presence of said
toxin is determined by detecting the presence of bound
label.
6. The process of Claim 5 wherein the label is an enzyme
label.
17

7. The process of Claim 6 wherein the enzyme label is
alkaline phosphatase.
8. The process of Claim 4 wherein in the assay antibody
to C. difficile is supported on a solid support, the
supported C. difficile antibody is contacted with analyte
to bind the C. difficile antigen to the C. difficile anti-
body, the antigen is contacted with mono-specific antibody
to bind mono-specific antibody to toxin A of the bound
antigen, subsequently bound mono-specific antibody is con-
tacted with a labelled form of antibody for the mono-specific
antibody, and the presence of said toxin A is determined by
detecting the presence of bound label.
9. The process of Claim 8 wherein the label is an enzyme
label.
10. The process of Claim 9 wherein the enzyme label is
alkaline phosphatase.
11. In an assay for toxin B of C. difficile wherein an
analyte containing toxin B is contacted with an antibody,
the improvement comprising:
contacting said analyte with mono-specific antibody
for toxin B of C. difficile to bind only toxin B to said
mono-specific antibody.
12. The process of Claim 11 wherein in the assay antibody
to C. difficile is supported on a solid support, the supported
C. difficile antibody is contacted with analyte to bind
C. difficile antigen to the supported C. difficile antibody
and subsequently the bound antigen is contacted with mono-
specific antibody in a labelled form and the presence of
18

said toxin is determined by detecting the presence of bound
label.
13. The process of Claim 12 wherein the label is an enzyme
label.
14. The process of Claim 13 wherein the enzyme label is
alkaline phosphatase.
15. The process of Claim 11 wherein in the assay antibody
to C. difficile is supported on a solid support, the supported
C. difficile antibody is contacted with analyte to bind the
C. difficile antigen to the C. difficile antibody, the antigen
is contacted with mono-specific antibody to bind mono-specific
antibody to toxin B of the bound antigen, subsequently
bound mono-specific antibody is contacted with a labelled
form of antibody for the mono-specific antibody, and the
presence of said toxin B is determined by detecting the
presence of bound label.
16. The process of Claim 15 wherein the label is an enzyme
label.
17. The process of Claim 16 wherein the enzyme label is
alkaline phosphatase.
18. In an assay for toxigenic C. difficile wherein an
analyte containing toxigeneic C. difficile is contacted
with an antibody, the improvement comprising:
contacting said analyte with antibody specific for
toxins of C. difficile to bind only C. difficile toxins
to the antibody.
19. The process of Claim 18 wherein in the assay antibody
19

to C. difficile is supported on a solid support, the supported
C. difficile antibody is contacted with analyte to bind
C. difficile antigen to the supported C. difficile antibody
and subsequently the bound antigen is contacted with mono-
specific antibody in a labelled form and the presence of
said toxin is determined by detecting the presence of bound
label.
20. The process of Claim 19 wherein the label is an enzyme
label.
21. The process of Claim 20 wherein the enzyme label is
alkaline phosphatase.
22. The process of Claim 18 wherein in the assay antibody
to C. difficile is supported on a solid support, the supported
C. difficile antibody is contacted with analyte to bind the
C. difficile antigen to the C. difficile antibody, the antigen
is contacted with mono-specific antibody to bind mono-specific
antibody to C. difficile toxins of the bound antigen, sub-
sequently bound mono-specific antibody is contacted with a
labelled form of antibody for the mono-specific antibody,
and the presence of said C. difficile toxins is determined
by detecting the presence of bound label.
23. The process of Claim 22 wherein the label is an enzyme
label.
24. The process of Claim 23 wherein the enzyme label is
alkaline phosphatase.
25. The process for providing antibodies specific for toxins
of C. difficile, comprising:

contacting C. difficile antibody, which includes anti-
bodies specific for toxins of C. difficile, antibody to
non-toxic protein antigen and antibody to non-toxic heat
stable antigen with non-toxic C. difficile protein antigen
to bind antibody to non-toxic protein antigen thereto;
contacting said C difficile antibody free of antibody
to non-toxic protein antigen with a non-toxic heat stable
antigen of C. difficile to bind the antibody for the non-
toxic heat stable antigen thereto; and
recovering antibody specific for toxins of C. difficile.
26. The process of Claim 25 wherein the non-toxic C. difficile
protein antigen is in the form of whole cells of a non-toxic
strain of C. difficile.
27. The process of Claim 26 wherein the non-toxic heat stable
antigen of C. difficile is supported on a solid support.
28. A process for providing mono-specific antibody for
toxin A of C. difficile, comprising:
contacting C. difficile antibody, which includes anti-
bodies specific for toxins of C. difficile, antibody to non-
toxic protein antigen and antibody to non-toxic heat stable
antigen with non-toxic C. difficile protein antigen to bind
antibody to non-toxic protein antigen thereto;
contacting said C. difficile antibody free of antibody
to non-toxic protein antigen with a non-toxic heat stable
antigen of C. difficile to bind the antibody for the non-
toxic heat stable antigen thereto;
recovering antibody specific for toxins of C. difficile;
contacting antibody specific for toxins of C. difficile
21

with toxin A of C. difficile supported on a solid support
to bind mono-specific antibody for toxin A thereto; and
subsequently eluting mono-specific antibody for toxin
A therefrom.
29. The process of Claim 28 wherein the non-toxic C. difficile
protein antigen is in the form of whole cells of a non-toxic
strain of C. difficile.
30. The process of Claim 29 wherein the non-toxic heat stable
antigen of C. difficile is supported on a solid support.
31. process for providing mono-specific antibody for toxin
B of C. difficile, comprising:
contacting C. difficile antibody, which includes anti-
bodies specific for toxins of C. difficile, antibody to non-
toxic protein antigen and antibody to non-toxic heat stable
antigen with non-toxic C. difficile protein antigen to bind
antibody to non-toxic protein antigen there to;
contacting said C. difficile antibody free of antibody
to non-toxic protein antigen with a non-toxic heat stable
antigen of C. difficile to bind the antibody for the non-
toxic heat stable antigen thereto;
recovering antibody specific for toxins of C. difficile;
contacting antibody specific for toxins of C. difficile
with toxin B of C. difficile supported on a solid support to
bind mono-specific antibody for toxin B thereto; and
subsequently eluting mono-specific antibody for toxin
B therefrom.
32. The process of Claim 31 wherein the non toxic C. difficile
protein antigen is in the form of whole cells of a non-toxic
strain of C. difficile.
22

33. The process of Claim 32 wherein the non-toxic heat
stable antigen of C. difficile is supported on a solid
support.
23

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-I '7~
1 This invention relates to a C. di~ficile and more particularly to the production
2 of antibodies to the toxins of C. difficile, purification of the toxins, and the use
3 thereof in an assay for C. diffieile toxins.
4 The anaerobic organism Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is associated with
antibiotic related pseudomembranous colitis and as a result, there have been tests
6 developed to ascertain the presence of C. difficile antigen in specimens of human
7 stool.
8 One such test involves culture of human feces, which requires specialized
9 facilities and a long period-of time. This test also detects strains of C. difficile that
10 do not produce toxins, and thus gives false positive results.
11 Another test involves counter immunoelectrophosesis, however, this test, as
12 currently used, is not sensitive enough to detect toxins and gives a lot of false
13 positives.
14 A further test involves an enzyme immunoassay; however, such test, as
15 currently used, does not differentiate between toxic and non-toxic strains, and as a
16 result, the test may give misleading results.
17 The present invention is directed to antibodies for toxins of C. difficile, toxins
0I C. difficile, and an assay for toxigenic C. diff cule.
19 In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a
20 mono-specific antibody for toxin A of C. difficilet and such mono-specific antibody
22 supported on a solid support.
2 In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a
3 mono-specific antibody for toxin B of C. difficile, and such mono-specific antibody
24 supported on a solid support.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided
27 pure toxin A of C. difficile, and such toxin on a solid support.
28 In accordance with yet another aspeet of the present inventiont there is
29 provided an assay for toxin A of C. difficile which uses mono-specific antibody for
30 toxin A.

3 . 0 73
- 2a -
In another embodiment the lnvention p.rovides the
process for providing antibodies speciEic for toxins
of C. difficile, comprising:
contacting C. difficlle antibody, which includes anti-
bodies specific for toxins of C. difficile, antibody to
non-toxic protein antigen and antibody to non-toxic heat
table antigen with non-toxic C. difficile protein antigen
to bind antibody to non-toxic protein antigen thereto;
contacting said C . dif f icile antibody free of antibody
to non-toxic protein antigen with a non-toxic heat stable
antigen of C. difficile to bind the antibody for the non-
toxic heat stable antigen thereto; and
recovering antibody specific for toxins of C. difficile.

1~3~ 73
1 In accordance with yet a further aspect of the invention, there i9 provided an
2 assay for toxigenic C. difficile.
3 The term "mono-specific antibody for toxin A", as used herein, means an
4 antibody which does not have any determinant sites for antigens of C. difflcile other
than toxin A.
6 The term "mono-specific Mtibody for toxin B", as used herein7 means an
7 antibody which does not have any determinant sites for antigens of C. diff_ile other
8 than toxin B.
g The term mono-specific antibody as used herein includes such antibody in a
mono-clonal form.
11 It is to be understood that the mono-specific antibodies to toxin A and/or toxin
12 B can be produced from an organism other than C. difficile, so long as the antibody
13 does not have a determinant site for another antigen of C. difficile.
14 C. difficile antibody or antibody to C. difficile means antibody which is not
mono-specific, and which therefore is comprised of a mixture of antibodies, which
16 includes antibodies for toxins of C. difficile (antibody for toxin A and antibody for
17 toxin B) and antibodies for non-toxins of C. difficile.
18 Antibody for toxigenic C. difficile or antibody specific for toxins OI C. difficile
19 means antibody which does not have determinant sites for antigens of C. diffi ile
other than toxin A and toxin B (a mixture of antibody specific only for toxin A and
21 antibody specific only for toxin B).
22 Toxin A is the C. difficile toxin that is generally referred to as the enterotoxin.
23 Toxin A has a native molecular weight between 550,000 and 600,000, an isoelectric
24 point of 5.5, contains no detectable carbohydrate or phosphorus and does not exhibit
detectable protease activity. It is inactivated as pH 2.0 and is stable at a pH of 10Ø
26 Toxin A is eluted from DEAE by a buffer containing 0.16;iI NaCl.
27 Toxin B is the C. difficile toxin which is generally referred to as the cytotoxin
28 of C. difficile. Toxin ~3 has a native molecular ~ei"ht between 380,000 and 470~000y
29 an isoelectric point of 3.8; contains no detectable phosphorus, but does contain very

~L~3~70~
1 small amounts of carbohydrate (which may be a contaminant) fund does not exhibit
2 detectable protease activity. Toxin B is inactivated by pH's less than 2.0 and over
3 l0.0, and is eluted from a DEAE column with a salt concentration of 0.41\1.
4 It is to be understood, however, that although toxin A is referred to as the
enterotoxin such toxin A also has cytotoxicity.
6 In accordance with one aspect of the invention, toxin A, which has been
7 partially purified by separation from toxin B, and which still includes some non
8 toxigenic proteins is further purified to produce pure toxin A. In accrodance with
9 this aspect of the invention, the pH and molarity of an aqueous solution of toxin A
10 are adjusted to precipitate toxin A, without precipitating the remaining proteins,
11 whereby pure toxin A is recovered.
12 gore particularly, the pH of the aqueous solution is adjusted to a pEI of less
13 than 6.0 and at which toxin A precipitates without precipitation of other proteins or
14 denaturation of the tOXill, and the molarity of the aqueous solution is adjusted to less
lS than 0.1M and at which toxin A precipitates without precipitation of other proteins.
16 In general the pH is at least 5.0, with the pH preferably being from 5.3 to 5.7, with
17 the best results being achieved at pH 5.5. The molarity of the solution is generally at
18 least 0.001 M, with best results being achieved at 0.01M.
19 T.he molarity and pH may be achieved by using a suitable salt buffer; e g., a
20 sodium acetate buffer. The adjustment OI molarity may be conveniently achieved by
21 dialysis, although other procedures are applicable.
22 The precipitated pure toxin A is recovered from the aqueous solution and may
23 be solublized in water at a buffered pH of about 7.5.
24 The partially purified toxin A, which is purified in accordance with the
25 invention to produce pure toxin A may be recovered by procedures generally known in
26 the art. For example, the supernatent from a cell culture of a toxigenic C. difficile
27 strain is concentrated with an ultrafiltration membrane that retains only large
28 molecules (over 100,000 M.W.) and the retained material is applied to a chromato-
29 graphic column. The column (DEAE) is then eluted with gradients of sodium chloride

~3~70'73
1 (the first gradient is 0.05-0.25 M NaCl with a 0.3 M NaCl wash and the second
2 gradient is 0.3-0.6 NaCl), with the first gradient eluting toxin A and th~3 second
3 gradient toxin B.
4 The term "pure toxin A" as used herein, indicates that the toxin A preparation
is free of contaminating substances (only toxin A is present) when examined by a6 variety of highly resolving techniques known in the art. The term partially purified,
as used herein, indicates that some contaminants, but not all, have been removed.
8 Pure toxin A when prepared by the procedures described above is pure by the criteria
9 of: a single band on acrylamide gel electrophoresis when done with 1~0 ug of protein
per gel rod (Davis, SDS, and gradient gels); a single immunoprecipitin arc on crossed
11 immunoelectrophoresis plates with antisera made to the complete mixture of C.
12 diffi ile antigens, and pure toxin A when injected into animals elicits production of a
13 mono-specific entibody to toxin A.
14 The mono-specific antibody for toxin A of C. difficile and the mono-specific
lS antibody for toxin B of C. difficile may be prepared by several different procedures.
16 In accordance with one procedure, C. difficile culture supernatant fluids
17 produced by a known cultivating procedure are boiled to destroy all heat-labile
18 protein antigens (toxin and non-toxin antigen) and thereby provide material19 containing only the heat-stable antigens of C. difficile. These antigens are then
supported on a first cyanogen bromide activated Sepharose column.
21 Partially purified toxin A and partially purified toxin B, each obtained by
22 elution from a DEAE chromatographic column, as hereinabove described, are coupled
23 to a second and third cyanogen bromide ectivated Sepharose column, respectively.
24 Antibodies to crude C. difficile antigens toxin (such toxin includes both toxin A
and toxin B as well as many other antigens produced by the bacterium ) are produced
26 in a suitable animal; e.g. goats, end the elicited antibody is comprised of an antibody
27 mixture to C. difficile antigens (such antibody mixture includes antibodies for toxin A
28 and toxin B, as well as antibodies to the non-toxin antigens, including antibodies to
29 the heat-stable antigens.) The non-toxin antibodies (except the antibodies to the no

lZ~ D'73
1 toxin heat-stahle antigens) are removed from the antibocly mixture by contact with
2 whole cells of non-toxic strain of C. difEiclle to thereby bind the antibodies to non-
3 toxins except for the antibodies to the nontoxic hea-t-stable antigens.
4 Subsequently, the antibody mixture (which now contains the antibodies for the
5 toxins, and the antibodies to the non-toxic heat-stable antigens) is then applied to
6 the first column on which the heat-stable antigens of C. difficile are supported,
7 whereby the sugar antibodies to the heat-stable antigens become bound.
8 The mixture which is free of antibody against the heat-stable antigens and
9 contains antibodies to toxins A and B is then divided into two parts, with one part
10 being applied to the second column on which pure toxin A is supported, and the other
11 part being applied to the third column on which partially purified toxin B is
12 supported, whereby in the second column, the antibody to toxin A becomes sole
13 tively bound to the supported toxin A and in the third column, the antibody to toxin B
14 becomes selectively bound to the supported toxin B.
The antibodies for toxin A and the antibodies for toxin B are each subsequently
16 eluted from the second and third columns, respectively; e.g., by the use of potasshlm
17 thiocyanate to thereby, respectively, produce mono-specific antibody for toxin A and
18 mono-specific antibody for toxin B.
19 In some cases as hereinafter described, the mixture of antibody for toxin A and
20 antibody for toxin B (after removal OI non-toxic antigens) may be used without
separation into mono-specific antibody for each of the toxins, e.g., in an assay for
2~ toxigenic C difficile.
23 Alternatively, mono-specific antibody to toxin A may be produced by applying
24 the crude C. difficile antibody onto a column support with immobilized pure toxin A.
5 The non toxin A antibodies are removed from the column by extensive washing and
26 the remaining antibodies, which are attached to the toxin A, are eluted with
27 potassium thiocyanate.
28 Alternatively, mono-specific antibody to toxin A may be produced from purified
29 toxin A prepared as hereinabove described, by injecting toxin A (mixed with some

Y ~3'i'~73
1 formaldahyde to decrease toxicity without destroying antigenicity or neutralized with
2 antibody) into a suitable animal; e.g. a goat. The mono-specific antibody to toxin A
3 is then recovered by the procedure described in the preceding paragraph.4 The mon~specific antibodies and the toxins of the present invention may be
supported on a solid support for use in an assay for C. difficile. Alternatively, such
6 antibodies and toxins may be used in such an assay in an unsupported form.
7 In using a solid support, the solid support may be any of a wide variety of solids,
8 and may be ernployed in any one of a wide variety of forms; e.g. plates, trays,
9 particles, tubes, sheets, etc.
As representative examples of suitable supports, there may be mentioned:
11 synthetic polymer supports, such as polystyrene, polypropylene, substituted poly-
12 styrene (e.g. aminated or carboxylated polystyrene), polyacrylamides, polyamides,
13 polyvinylchloride, etc.; glass beads, agarose; etc. The supports may include reactive
14 groups, e.g carboxyl groups, amino groups, etc. to permit direct linking to the
support.
16 The antibodies and toxins of the present invention may be supported on a solid
17 support in a variety of ways; for example, by adsorption, covalent coupling,
18 activation of a suitable support, with protein A, etc.
19 As representative examples of suitable coupling agents there may be me
tioned: dialdehydes; for example glutaraldehyde, succinaldehyde, malonaldehyde~
21 etc.; unsaturated aldehyde, e.g., acrolein, methacrolein, crotonaldehyde, etc.; carbo-
22 diimides, diisocyanates; dimethyladipimate; cyanuric chloride etc. The selection of a
23 suitable coupling agent should be apparent to those skilled in the art from the
24 teachings herein.
Similarly, the antigen may be supported by activation of a suitable support; for26 example, cyanogen bromide activated agarose.
27 In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the antibodies and toxins
28 of the present invention may be used in an assay for either toxin A, or toxin B of C.
29 difficile or for toxigenic C. difficile (both toxin A and toxin B).
3~

I ~,~3~0t` ~;3 !
1 In some ot such assays, one or more of such substances are used in a "labelled"
2 or "tagged" form, and such labels or tag are of a type known in the art for use in
3 assays. Thus, Yor example, the label or tag mny be a radioactive substance, such as
4 radioactive iodine, radioactive cobalt, tritium, etc.; an enzyme; a fluorescent
5 material; a chemiluminescent material, etc.
6 The labels may be added to the various substances by procedures as generally
7 practiced in the art. Similarly, the label or tag may be detected by procedures known
8 in the nrt; for example, counters for radioactive labels, colorimetric detection of
9 enzymes, etc.
The antibodies and toxins of the present invention may be used in supported
11 and/or unsupported form for the assay of C. difficile.
l In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, there is provided an assay
13 for toxin A of C. difficile by use of the mono-specific antibody for toxin A.
14 In accordance with one aspect of this embodiment, antibody to C. difficile is
15 supported on a solid support; for example, a microtiter plate. The supported C.
16 difficile antibody is then contacted with a sample to be analyzed (analyte) such as a
17 dilution of patient feces, and as a result of such contact, any toxin A present in the
18 analyte, as well as other antigens of C. difficile, become bound to the supported C.
19 difficile antibody. Subsequently, the bound analyte portion is contacted with mono-
20 specific antibody for toxin A of C. difficile, Iraised in an animal different than the
21 animal in which C. diifide antibody was raised,) and such mono-specific antibody is
22 only bound by any toxin A present in the bound analyte portion.
23 This mono-specific antibody may itself be labelled with an enzyme, flourescent
24 material, or radioactive material as described previously, and the presence of toxin A
25 can be determined by detecting the presence of this label. Alternatively, the monk
26 specific antibody bound to toxin A can be detected by use of labelled antibody
27 specific for antibody of the animal in which the mon~specific antibody was raised;
28 this binds to the mono-specific antibody attached to toxin A. This method is referred
29 to in the art as a double antibody sandwich form of the ELISA assay.

. 1~,3~0'73
1 The presence of toxin A in the analyte may be determined by its interaction
2 with rnono~specific toxin A antibody in the assay.
3 The above procedure may also be employed for the determination of toxin B in
4 an analyte by use of mono-specific antibody for toxin B in place of mono-specific
antibody for toxin A.
6 In another assay for toxin A of C. difficilel mono-specific antibody for toxin A
7 may be supported on a solid support; for example, a microtiter plate, and the
8 supported mon~specific antibody for toxin A is contacted with analyte suspected of
9 containing toxin A, whereby any toxin A present in the sample (and only toxin A)
becomes bound to the supported mono-specific antibody. The presence and/or
11 amount of bound toxin A may then be determined by contacting the bound toxin A
12 with C. difficile antibody, in labelled form, with such labelled antibody being bound
13 by any bound toxin A. The presence and/or amount of toxin A present in the analyte
14 is then determined by determining the presence andlor amount of the bound labelled
antibody.
16 The above procedure may also be used in an assay for toxin B by substituting
17 mono-specific antibody for toxin B for the mono-specific antibody for toxin A.
18 In accordance with a further assay for toxin A, the analyte col taining or
19 suspected of containing toxin A, is contacted with a solid support, such as amicrotiter tray so that at least the toxin A in the analyte is supported on the solid
21 support. The presence of this toxin A is then detected by mon~specific antibody for
22 toxin A. The supported toxin A selectively binds only the mono-specific antibody for
23 toxin A. Thus, the mono-specific antibody is supported on a solid support through the
24 supported toxin A of the analyte. This antibody can have a label, such as an enzyme
attached, that wiU allow its detection or a labelled antibody can be used that reacts
26 with the antibody bound to the toxin A (sandwich ELISA method). The presence
27 and/or amount of bound labelled antibody is a measure of the presence or amount of
28 toxin A in the analyte.
2g

1In accordarlce with a still further assay, toxin A may be detected by an
2agglutination procedure. According to such procedure, solid particles sensitized with
3mono~specific antibody to toxin A are contacted with analyte containing or suspected
a,of containing toxin A with the presence of toxin A causing agglutination of such
5particles.
6The agglutination assay is also suitable for detecting toxin B by using mono-
7specific antibodies to toxin B in place of the mono-specific antibody to toxin A.
RIn accordance with still another assay, toxin A may be determined by an
inhibition of agglutination procedure by eontacting solid particles sensitized with
10 purified toxin A (or sensitized with crude C. diff_cile toxin, which includes toxin A)
11 with both analyte containing or suspected of containing toxin A, and mono-specific
1 antibody for to2dh A of C. difficile, with the presence of to2~in A in the analyte
13 inhibiting agglutination of the sensiti2ed particles by the mono-specific antibody.
Such procedure may also be employed for determining toxin B by sensitizing the
15 particles with crude toxin and use of mono-specific antibody for toxin B.
16As a further modification, the assay can be directed to determining toxigenic
17C. difficile (toxin A andtor toxin B) by use of antibody for toxigenic C. difficile (a
18mixture of the mono-speeific antibody for toxin A and the mon~specific antibody for
20toxin B which is free of determinant sites for non-toxic antigens). By using a mixture
21of such mono-specific antibodies, it is possible to determine the presence of either
toxin A or toxin B in a sample.
22The present invention will be further described with respect to the following
2~examples; however, the scope of the invention is not to be limited therebyo
EXAMPLE I
25This example is directed to the production of mon~specific antibody for toxin
26A, and mono-specific antibodies for toxin B.
Bacteria and g_owth conditions Two-liter brain heart infusion dialysis tube
28
flasks were inoculated with 0.1 rnl of actively growing cllltures of C. diff_ci1e VPI
29strain 11186 (non-toxigenic) and C. difficile VPI strain 10463 (toxigenic), and the
10.

1 fl&sks were incubated at 37 C for 3 days. The cells were obtained from inside the
2 dialysis sack by centrifugation of the contents (9,000 xg for 15 minutes).
3 Preparation of boiled cell wash BOW - Sepharose, Toxin A - ~oxA) -
4 Sepharose. and Toxin B ~oxB) - Sepharose.
Strain 10463 packed cells (ca. 15 ml obtained from 12 flasks) were washed 3
6 times (30 ml per wash) with 0.1 M NaHC03 -0.5M NaCl, pH 8. Cell washes were
8 pooled and the pool was heated at 100 C for 15 minutes. The precipitated material
g was removed by centriguation (12,000 x g for 30 minutes) and the supernatant fluid
lO (ca. mg. of protein in 90 ml) was added to 60 ml of Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia Fine
ll Chemicals, Uppsala, Sweden) which had been activiated with 18 g of CNBr. The
12 suspension was gently mixed at 4 C overnight and uncoupled materi 1 was removed
by washing the gel with one bed volume of 0.1 M NsHCO3-0.5M N~Cl. Protein
13 analysis of the wash indicated that the gel prepartion contained pa. 0.3 mg of protein
15 per ml gel. The remaining active groups on the Sepharose gel were blocked by adding
16 one bed volume of 1 M ethanolamine, pH 8, and mixing the gel at 4 C overrught. The
17 gel, designated BCW-Sepharose, was washed 4X with alternating volumes ~2 bed
18 volumes per wash) of 0.1 M sodium acetate-0.5 M NaCl, pH 4, and 0.1 M NaHCO3-0.5
l9 M NaCl, pH 8.
Partially purified toxin A and to~nn B were prepared by ion exchange chrom.a-
21 tography on DEAE Sepharose CL-6B (Ph~ramcia Fine Chemicals) us described in
Example II and each preparation was dialyzed overnight Rt 4 C against 0.1 M
22
23 NaHCO3-0~5 M NaCl. Toadn A a 3.3 mg of protein in 20 ml) and toxin B (ca. 1.1
24 mg of protein in 20 ml) were each coupled, as described for BCW-Sepharose~ to 20 ml
25 of Sepharose 4B which had been activiated with 7 g of CNBr. Protein analyses of the
26 washes indicated that ToxA-Sepharose and 'roxB-Sepharose contained 170 ug of
27 protein and 54 ug of protein per ml of gel, respectively.
28 Purification of monospecific antisera against Toxins A and B. oat antiserum
was prepared, as previously described, USillg refrigerated formaldehyde (Ehrich, M.,
29 R. L. Van Tassell, J.l~1. Libbyl and T.D. Wilkins, 1980. Production of Clostridium
*Trade Mark
11.

lZ3'~0'73
1 ¦ difficïle Mntitoxin. Infect. Immun. 28:lQ4l l043~) against A crude O difficile toxin
2 ¦ preparation containing Towns A and B. Antiserum (5 ml) was added to a suspension
3 ¦ of strain 11186 cells (1.5 ml packed cells in 3 ml 0.85','~ NaCl) and the mixture was
4 ¦ gently homogenized with a Potter Elvehjam tissue grinder and then rotated for 2 h at
5 1 room temperature. The cells were subsequently removed by centrifugation (12,000 x
6 1 g for 30min) and the supernatant fluid was passed through a 0.45 um membrane and
7 1 concentrated to lX with a minicon-Bl5 concentrator (Amicon Corp, Lexington,
8 1 Mass.). Strain 11186 ceLI-adsorbed antiserum (4.1 ml) was applied to a column (1.5 by
9 ¦ 31.4 cm) of BCW-Sepharose, and nonadsorbed material was eluted at room tempera-
ture with 2 bed volumes of 0.1 M NaHCO3-0.5 M NaCl, pH 8, at a flow rate of 40
11 ml/h. The eluate was concentrated to lX by ultrafiltration in a stirred ce11 equipped
12 with a PM 10 membrane (Amicon Corp.). The BCW-Sepharose-eluate (4.1 ml) was
13 divided into 2 equal portions which were applied to columns (l by 25 cm) of ToxA-
14 Sepharose and ToxB-Sepharose. Nonadsorbed material was eluted at room tempera-
ture frorn each column with 2 bed volumes of 0.1 M NaHCO3-O.5 M NaCl, pH 8, at a16 flow rate of 40 ml/h. Eluates were concentrated to lX by ultrafiltration.17 Elution of antibodies bound to ToxA-Sepharose and ToxB-Sepharose. Following
18 the elution of nonadsorbed material from ToxA-Sepharose and ToxB-Sepharose, the
19 columns were washed with 0.1 M NaHCO3-0.5 M NaCl., pH 8, until there was no
measurable adsorbance at 280 nm. Antibodies bound to the gels were eluted by
21 applying 5 ml of 3.5 M KSCN, pH 6.8, to each column and washing with 0.1 M
2~ NaHCO3-0.5 M NaCl. Approximately 2 bed volumes were collected from each
23 column. The eluates were dialyzed against 4 l of 0.1 M borate-buffered s~1ine pH 8.5,
24 at 4 C overnight and concentrated to lX by ultrafiltration.
The antibody eluted from the ToxA-Sepharose column is the mono-specific
26 antibody for toxin A of C. difficile and the antibody eluted from the ToxB-Sepharose
27 column is the mono-specific antibody for toxin B of C. dlfficile.
28 Purificatlon of I~G fraction. The eluted antibodies from the ToxA-Sepharose
29 and ToxB-Sepharose column were purified by chromatography on DEAE Affi-Gel Blue

l 70~3
1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Rockville Centre~ NY) as recommended by the manufacturer
2 for the purification of rabbit IgG. Antiserum samples (2 ml) were applied to A column
3 of DEAE Affi-Gel Blue (1 by 31.8 cm) and eluted at a flow rate of 20 mVh. Fractions
4 (2 ml) containing purified IgG were pooled and concentrated to lX by ultrafiltration.
EXAMPLE II
6 This example is directed to production of pure toxin A of C. difficile.
7 Bacteri 1 strain. Clostridium difficile VPI strain 10463 was grown in two liter
8 brain heart infusion (BHI~ dialysis flasks for 72 hours at 37 C. After centrifugation
9 at 80U0 X g for 10 minutes and filtration through a 0.45 um membrane filter
(Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA), the culture supernatant (c.750 ml) was concentrated
11 to 50 ml by ultrafiltration, at 4 C, using an XM-100 membrane filter (Amicon Corp.,
12 Lexington, MA) with a thin channel type concentrator. The retentate was washed
13 with 1500 ml of 50 mM TRIS-HCl buffer, pH 7.5 (4 C) and concentrated to a final
14 volume of 40-50 ml. This removed many small molecular weight contaminants. The
concentrated supernatant was loaded onto a 2.5 by 10 cm DEAE; Sepharose CL-6B
16 column which had been equilibrated with 50mM TRIS-HCl, pH 7.5. After sample
l loading, the column was washed with 200 ml of 50 mM TRIS-HCl, pEI 7.5, containing
18 0.0~ M NaCl. The sample was eluted first with a 300 ml linear NaCl gradient in 50
19 mM TRIS-HCl buffer (0.05-0.25 M NaCl), followed by 150 ml of 50m~ TRIS-HCl, pH
7.5, containing 0.3 M NaCl. A second 300 ml linear gradient (0.3 - 0.6 M NaCl) in the
21 same buffer followed the 0.3 M NaCl wash. The flow rate of the columns was 55-60
22 ml per hr (Gravity) at 4 C. Fractions (4~2 ml) were collected and assayed for
23 cytotoxicity using CHO-Kl cells.
24 The fractions containing the highest cytotoxic titers were pooled, filter
sterilized and stored at 4 C. The toxins that eluted in the first and second NaCl
26 gradients were designated Toxins A and B respectively,- and are partiaIly purified
27 toxins A and B, respectively.
28 Five to ten ml of the toxic fractions from the first DEAE gradient (Toxin A
29 were dialyzed against one liter of 0.01 hi sodium acetate buffer pH 5.5 at 4 C for 18
13.

' ,37073
1 24 hours. The dialysate was centrifuged to recover the precipitate at 169 x g for 10
2 minutes and was then washed with 5 ml of the same acetate buffer and centrifuged
3 again. The precipitate was solubiliæed in 5-10 ml of 50 Mel TRI5-HCl, pH 7.54 containing 0.05 M NaCl and the solution of purified toxin A was filter-sterili~ed and
stored at 4D O
6 EXAMPLE m
7 The following buffers are used in an assay :Eor Toxins A and B.
B Csrbonate buffer (coating buffer)
9 1.59 g N a2CO3
2.93 g NaHCO3
ll 0.20 gNaN3
12 bring to 1 liter with dH20; pH 9.6;
13 store at room temperature (use within 2 weeks)
14 Phosphate-buffered saline - Tween 20 (PBS-T)
8.0 g NaCl
16 0.2 g ~H2PO4
17 2.9 g Na2HOP4 12H2O (2.2 g Na~HOP4 7H2O3
18 0.2 g KCl
19 0.5 ml Tweet 20 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate)
0~2 g NaN3
21 bring to 1 liter with dH2O; pH 7.4;
22 Dietharlolamine buffer (for alkaline phosphatase substrate
23 97 ml diethanolamine
24 800 ml dH2O
0.2 g NaN3
26 100 mg MgC12 6H20
27 titrate to pH 9.8 with 1 M HCI and bring volume to 1 liter with dH20; store in
28 dark bottle at room temperature; for substrate solution, add 1 mg substrate per
29 ml buffer;
*Trade Mark

1~3'7~3
1 Assay for Clostridiwn difficile Toxins A and B
2 1) Add 200 ul of 1/10,0û0 dilution (in carbonate buffer, pH 9.6) of rabbit antiserum
3 (antibody to C. difficile) to each well of a Dynatech Immulon type 2 microtiter plute.
4 Incubate at 4 C overnight.
2) Empty plate and add 200 ul of PBS-T containing 0.5~6 bovine serum albumin to
6 each well. Incubate plate at 37 C for 30 minutes.
7 3) Empty plate and add 200 ul of PBS-T to each well. Incubate plate at room temperature for 5 minutes.
9 4) Empty plate and add 200 ul of sample dilution or toxin dilution (1:2) in PBS-T to
wells. Incubate plate either at 37~ C for 1 hour or at room temperature overnight.
11 5) Empty plate and wash each well 3 times with PBS-T.
12 6) Add 200 ul of 1/1,000 dilution in PBS-T of monospecific antibody for either Toxin
13 A or Toxin B to each well. Incubate plate at 37 C for 1 hour.
14 7) Empty plate and wash each well 3 times with PBS-T.
8) Add 200 ul of 1/800 dilution (in PBS-T) of rabbit antigoat IgG coupled to alkaline
16 phosphatase to each well. Incubate plate at 37C for 1 hour
17 9) Em.pty plate and wash each well 3 times with PBS-T.
18 10) Add 200 ul of ~nitrophenylphosphate (1 mg/ml in diethanolamine buffer) to each
19 well. Incubate plate at room temperature for 1 hour.
11) Add 20 ul of 5 N NaOH to each well to terminate the reaction.
21 12) Mix contents of each well with 0.8 ml dH20 (total volume of assay mixture ca. 1
22 ml) and measure the absorbance at 405 nm.
23 The present invention is particularly advantageous in that it is possible to
24 produce antibodies which are specific for on]y the toxins of C. difficile. As a result,
there is provided an assay which is directed to determining the presence of these
26 toxins, rather than C. difficile, which will reduce or eliminate false positives.
27 furthermore, the present invention offers the advantage OI permitting an assay
28 which can be directed to either of the toxins or both toxins.
291
,.. .

- ` ~,3~73
1 ¦ An assay for the toxins in accordance with the invention is rapid and also less
21 costly than prior assays.
3 1 Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in
4 ¦ light of the above teachings, and, therefore, within the scope of the appended claims,
he invention may be practioed otherwise than as specifically desoribed.
1s
l6
19~
211
22
23
`25
26
28
16.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1237073 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2005-05-24
Grant by Issuance 1988-05-24

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY
Past Owners on Record
DAVID M. LYERLY
TRACY D. WILKINS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1993-09-29 7 193
Cover Page 1993-09-29 1 14
Abstract 1993-09-29 1 12
Drawings 1993-09-29 1 12
Descriptions 1993-09-29 16 693