Language selection

Search

Patent 1273696 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1273696
(21) Application Number: 1273696
(54) English Title: KNEADING APPARATUS FOR BREAD DOUGH AND THE LIKE AND A METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE QUALITY THEREOF DURING KNEADING
(54) French Title: PETRIN MECANIQUE POUR PATE DE BOULANGERIE ET SES ANALOQUES, ET METHODE DE CONTROLE DE LA QUALITE DE LADITE PATE AU COURS DU PETRISSAGE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A21C 1/02 (2006.01)
  • A21C 1/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HAYASHI, TORAHIKO (Japan)
(73) Owners :
  • RHEON AUTOMATIC MACHINERY CO., LTD.
(71) Applicants :
  • RHEON AUTOMATIC MACHINERY CO., LTD. (Japan)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1990-09-04
(22) Filed Date: 1986-10-28
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60-242292 (Japan) 1985-10-29

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT
A KNEADING APPARATUS FOR BREAD DOUGH AND THE
LIKE AND A METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE QUALITY
THEREOF DURING KNEADING
An apparatus and method for controlling the quality of bread
dough is provided. Instruments such as a strain gauge, a
thermometer, a weighing device, and a pH meter are disposed, and
values measured with these instruments are indicated on a display
for monitoring.
By comparing the temperature, weight, and pH values of the
dough and strain caused on an agitator with control values stored
in a computer, undesirable products can be eliminated and dough
temperature can be adjusted during the kneading operation.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims:
1. A kneading apparatus for controlling the quality of bread
dough and the like during kneading, comprising a kneading vessel,
an agitator, measuring instruments consisting of a strain gauge
mounted on said agitator, a thermometer and a pH meter mounted
on the inner surface of said kneading vessel, and a weighing
device mounted relative to said kneading vessel, said measuring
instruments being adapted to begin their measurement as soon as
the kneading begins, and means for displaying the individual
chronologically measured values.
2. A kneading apparatus comprising a kneading vessel, an
agitator, measuring instruments consisting of a strain gauge
mounted on said agitator, a thermometer and a pH meter mounted on
the inner surface of said kneading vessel, a weighing device
mounted relative to said kneading vessel, said measuring
instruments being adapted to begin measurement as soon as the
kneading operation begins, and a computer adapted to store
measurement data, compare individual measured values with control
values to find differences between them and make logical decisions
on the basis of previously stored data, thereby directing the best
rotation speed of the agitator, directing temperature corrections,
indicating charging of any wrong material, and deciding the
duration and end of the kneading operation.
19

3. A method of controlling the quality of bread dough and the
like during kneading, comprising the steps of continuously and
simultaneously measuring chronological changes of the kneading
resistance value, pH value, temperature value, and weight value,
of dough being kneaded, monitoring the thus obtained measurements,
adjusting or changing the kneading conditions as required, and
stopping the kneading operation when it is judged completed.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ ~ 7 3 ~ ~ ~
A KNEADING APPARATUS FOR BREAD DOUGH AND T~IE
LIKE AND A METHOD OF CONTROLLIN~ THE QUALITY
T~!ER~OF DURING KNEADING
Background of the Invention
1. Field of the Inventio_
This invention relates to an apparatus for kneading materials
such as bread dough and the like and a method of controlling the
quality of the materials during kneading, and particularly to an
apparatus and method for kneading bread dough and the like in a
mass production plant where quality control is required.
2. Description o-f Prior Art
To control the quality of bread dough and the like in
kneading, the operator measures physical properties of the dough,
as for instance, its viscosity, temperature, or pH values, as he
feels it necessary to measure them on a case-by-case basis, but
the measuring method has not been organized or systematic, so that
no sufficient control of quality has been available to detect
inferior quality before products are manufactured. The
conventional method fails to provide instantaneous observation of
all required parameters of kneading conditions, so that there have
been occurrences of failure. Furthermore, the inferior quality of
,
.

~ 3 ~ ~
products are often discovered only after they are manufactured,
thereby causing damage.
Japanese Early-Patent Publication No. 2~9333/61 teaches a
method of monitoring changes in kneading resistance using the
trend in the chronological change of electric power values and of
the amplitudes of waves of electric power values and stopping
kneading where measured values reach approximately the highest
point. This method aims only at the change in kneading
resistance, and other parameters, such as the temperature or the
pH value of a product, are disregarded. Therefore, the kneading
operation cannot be efectively controlled.
Summary of the Invention
It is an object of this inve~tion to pro~ide a~ apparatus and
method for controlling the quality of bread dough and the like
that is subjected to kneading.
It is another object of this invention to provide an
apparatus and method for controlling the kneading conditions, as,
for example, the amount of materials to be added in a kneader, the
kneading resistance of the kneader, and the temperature or the pH
value of the dough, during the kneading operation.
It is still another object of this invention to provide an
apparatus and method by which the kneading conditions can be
chronologically displayed so that the operator can take action to
correct irregulari-ties in the kneading operation.

3~
It is a further object of this invention to provide an
apparatus and method by which control values of kneading
conditions are stored in a computer, and the actual values o-f
kneading conditions are compared with the control -values to produce
quality products.
In one aspect of this invention, a kneading apparatus for
controlling the quality of bread dough and the like is provided,
which comprises a kneading vessel, an agitator, measuring
instruments consisting of a strain gauge mounted on said agitator,
a thermome~er and a pH meter mounted on the inner surface of said`
kneading vessel, and a weighing device mounted relative to said
kneading vessel, said measuring instruments being adapted to begin
their measurement as soon as the kneading begins, and means for
displaying the individual chronologically measured values.
In another aspect of this invention, a kneading apparatus is
provided, which comprises a kneading vessel, an agitator,
measur.ing instruments consisting of a strain gauge mounted on said
agitator, a thermometer and a pH meter mounted on the inner
surface of said kneading vessel, a weighing device mounted
relative to said kneading vessel, said measuring instruments being
adapted to begin measurement as soon as the kneading operation
begins~ and a computer adapted to store measurement data, compare
individual measured values with control values to find differences

between them and make Iogical decisions on the basis o~ previously
stored data, thereby directing the best rotation speed of the
agitator, directing temperature corrections, indicating charging
of ~ny wrong material, and deciding the duration and end of the
kneading operat ion .
In still another aspect of this invention, a method of
controlling the quality o-f bread dough and the like during
kneading is provided, which comprises the steps of continuously
and simultaneously measuring chronological changes o~ the kneading
resistance valueg pH value, temperature value, and weight value,
of dough being kneaded, monitoring the thus obtained measurements,
adjusting or changing the kneading conditions as required, and
stopping the kneading operation when it is judged completed.
This invention can instantaneously monitor four parameters,
namely, kneading registance, temperature, pH value, and weight of
dough, thereby adjusting kneading conditions such as kneading
time and angular speed of the drive device, to obtain high quality
bread dough.
Furthermore, a computer provided in the kneading apparatus of
this invention stores chronological control values of strain,
temperature, pH value and weight of the dough, and compares the
measured values with the control values to determine the optimum
kneading time, thereby controlling the quality of the bread dough.
Brief Description of the Drawings

-- 5 --
Fig. 1 is a sch~matic, partially cut away, elevational view
of a first embodiment of this invention.
Fig. 2 is an example o a set of curves plotted on a display
device of the first embodiment of this invention.
Fig. 3 is a schematic partially cut away, elevational view of
a second embodiment of this invention.
Fig. 4 is a curve of strain versus time plotted on a display
device, for determining control values.
Fig. 5 is a curve in which the amplitudes of the strain in
Fig. 4 are symmetrically plotted about a horizontal line.
Fig. 6 is a curve formed by tracing the upper peaks of the
amplitudes of strain in Fig. 5.
Fig. 7 shows curves representing control values of strain.
Description of the Preferred ~mbodiment
The first embodiment of this invention will now be described
by referring to Figs. 1 and 2.
In Fig. 1 a base 2 is provided with a drive device 10 for
rotating an agitator 4, a vessel 16 having a jacket 17, and an
actuating device 27 where a display device 26 is arranged. The
vessel 16 is supported by a bracket 18 which is adapted to
vertically move with a threaded rod 15. The rod 15 is rotatably
mounted on the base 2 and rotated by a handle ~not shown) so as to
vertically move the bracket 18 to adjust the position of the
.

~ 3~
vessel 16. The agitator 4 is fixedly connected to one end of
rotating input shaft 8 which is rotated through a belt 12 by the
drive device 10. In the inner surface of the vessel 16, a sensor
22 of a thermometer and a sensor 24 of a pH meter are provided,
which sensors transmit signals indicative of temperatures and pH
values to a display device 26 through respective amplifiers
accomodated in the actuating device 27. On the surface of the
rotating input shaft 8, a strain gauge 20 is disposed, which
S ,~rc.- ~
transmits signals indicative of the ~t~ of the rotating input
shaft 8 to the display device 26. A weighing device 14 is mounted
on one end of the bracket 18 and senses the weight of the vessel
16 and transmits signals indicative of the weight of the vessel 16
to the display device 26.
When materials, for example, wheat flour and water, are added
from a material tank 30 and a water tank 32, respectively, in the
vessel 16, and the drive device 10 is started, the actuating device
27 is energized. The actuating device 27 causes the sensors 22
and 2~, the strain gauge 20, and the weighing device 1~ to measure
the pH values, temperatures, strain, and weight of the materials
which are to be converted into bread dough. The values measured
are transmitted as electrical signals to the display device 26.
An example of the output, values measured versus time, depicted on
the screen of the display devi.ce 26, is shown in Fig. 2, in which
the line with the reference symbol ~a) represents the

~ 3~
chronological change of the weight of the materials, which weight
is obtained by subtracting the weight tare of the vessel from the
gross weight, the line with the reference symbol (b) represents
the chronological change of the strain of the rotating input shaft
8, ~he line with the reference symbol (c) represents the
chronological change of the temperature of the materials, and the
line with the reference symbol (d) represents the chronological
change of the pH value of the materials.
~ ~e ~ eS
A step-wise climb of line (a) indicates.~hargc~-oE the
materials.
Line (b) indicates the chronological change in the strain
caused on the agitator due to the resistance from the materials
subjected to kneading. When the materials are kneaded, it is
observed that they go through the "pick-up" stage, where the
materials are mixed; the "clean-up" stage, where the materials
start to agglomerate; the "development" stage, where the gluten in
the wheat flour develops and -forms a gel as a whole; and the "let-
down" stage, where the kneading destroys the gel structure.
The kneading of the bread dough is preferably stopped at the
stage of "development." If kneading is stopped before or after
this stage, good quality bread can not be produced.
The strain on the agitator due to kneading is low at the
"pick-up" stage. Very sharp vibrations of the strain value start
.

~ 3~9 ~
to appear on the display device a shor~ time before the start of
the "clean-up" stage. When the kneading reaches the "development"
stage, the strain values are on a relatively smooth plateau. At
the "let-down" stage, the strain value starts to decrease.
The length of time of and the strain values in each stage of
kneading vary depending on the composition of the materials used.
If the strain value starts to decrease earlier than in a standard
time frame, it may indicate an error in the selection of the type
o~ wheat flour and may result in an inferior product. In this
invention, when the data shows that the strain on the agitator is
outside the control value range, the kneading operation may be
stopped at that point.
In this invention, the increase of viscosity due to the
growth of the gluten structure or gel structure in the dough is
sensed as strain which the agitator receives from the dough while
being driven. In this embodiment, the strain is measured by the
strain gauge 20 disposed on the rotating input sha-ft 8. However,
the gauge 20 may also be disposed on any portions of a drive
system for driving the agitator.
Since ~he kneading conditions, the amount of materials~ the
strain, the temperature, and the pH value, are shown on the
display device 26, the operator can stop the kneading operation
when the values shown on the display device are in the desired
range. If abnormal phenomena occur on the display device 7 the

~ ~ ~ 3~
operator can take relevant action. When the weight of the
materials is insufficient, a necessary amount is added.
When the materials are mixed, the temperature rises in most
cases. However, there are cases where the temperature has to be
controlled depending on the type o product~ such as frozen bread
and pastry dough. The chronological change of the temperature in
the kneading of the materials for such products is an important
parameter for the production of good quality products.
If the temperature exceeds a desired value, the vessel is
cooled by introducing a coolant such as water, oil, and gases from
a coolant tank 34 into the jacket 17 of the vessel, until the
temperature decreases to the desired value.
When the temperature is less than the desired value, the
vessel is heated by a heater (not shown), until the temperature
increases to the desired value.
The graph in Fig. 2 contains curves, for the weight, strain,
temperature and the pH value, where the abscissa shows the time
and the ordinate shows those values.
In this embodiment, the necessary conditions for kneading the
dough can be obtained by a simple method and apparatus. According
to this embodiment, it is possible to observe the change in the
physical properties of the dough during the kneading operation and
to assess the quality of the dough product before the completion

~ ~3~
- 10 -
of the kneading operation. It is also possible to change the
kneading conditions before the operation ends to improve the
quality of the kneaded products. The method and apparatus of this
embodiment can avoid the damage caused by the conventional
kneading operation where the inferior quality of the product has
often been discovered only after the forming or baking operation.
The method and apparatus of this embodiment also makes it possible
to control the quality of the product to produce products of
uniform and superior quality.
A second embodiment of this invention will now be described
by referring to Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
In Fig. 3, a kneading apparatus similar to the apparatus
described in the first embodiment is illustrated, and a computer
control device 28 and valve devices 31, 33, and 35 are further
described.
The computer control device 2~ includes the actuating device
27, a storing device 29, and a comparator 25.
In this embodiment, temperature regulators ~not shown) are
provided between the comparator 25 and the valve device 35, and
between the comparator 25 and a heater (not shown) for heating the
dough, to control the temperature of the dough.
These regulators control the temperature of the dough in
accordance with a signal transmitted from the comparator 25.
The storing device 29 is for storing control values of

~ 3~3~
weight, strain, temperature, pH of the dough, a standard kneading
time, and a program to calculate extension or reduction of the
remaining time required for kneading the dough when the strain
measured becomes higher or lower than the range of control values.
The range of control values are generally determined based on
values measured by a number of tests run on the bread dough, to
which values allowance values are added to establish a range of
control values.
The comparator 25 compares the values transmitted from the
measuring devices with the range of control values stored in the
device 29.
When the weight values of the dough is less than the lower
limit of the range of control values, the comparator transmits a
signal to the valve devices 31 or 33 to open the valve or valves
to introduce a material from the material tank 30 or water from
the water tank 32 into the vessel 16 until the measured values
reach the range of control values.
When the temperature of the dough becomes higher than -the
range of control values, the comparator transmits a signal to the
temperature regulator to actuate the valve devices 35 to open the
valve and introduce a coolant from the coolant tank 34 into the
jacket 17 of the vessel 16 until the temperature of the dough
decreases to the range of control values.

;
~ ~ ~3~
When the temperature of the dough is lower than the lower
limit of the range of the control values, the comparator transmits
a signal to the temperature regulator ~o actuate the heater to
heat the vessel until the temperature of the dough increases to
exceed the lower limit of the range of the control values.
When the measured value remains outside the range of control
values for a predetermined time stored in the storing device~ the
comparator transmits a signal to stop the drive device to
eliminate the ma~erial from the kneading vessel.
When the pH value measured deviates from the control values,
the operator can take action to change chemical conditions in the
vessel.
In Fig. ~ there is shown a curve of strain versus time
plotted on a display device, of a typical sample of dough, for
providing a range of control values of strain.
As aforementioned, the kneading process of the dough can be
divided into four stages: the pick-up stage, the clean~up stage,
the development stage, and the let-down stage. The pick-up stage
is fur~her divided into a first pick-up stage and a second pick-up
stage.
In the pick-up stage, the materials added into the vessel are
mixed by the agitator, and the strain on the agitator gradually
increases. The amplitude of the strain measured appears
indistinct in the first pick-up stage, but is clearly visible in

o
- 13 -
the second pick-up stage.
The rise o~ s~rain values is due to the gel ~ormation in the
dough, which gel formation indicates the formation o~ thP
gluten structure.
In the clean-up stage, the magnitude of the strain amplitude
increases considerably. In the development stage, the strain
remains on a plateau while the magnitude of the strain amplitude
decreases visibly~
In the let-down stage, the value of the strain decreases, and
the amplitude of the strain is not observed because the gel formed
in the dough begins to be destroyed.
It is preferable to discontinue the kneading in the
development stage, well in advance of the let-down stage, for
instance, at a point E in the development stage as shown in Pig.
7.
A manner of determining the range of control values of strain
will now be described below.
The pattern of the amplitude of strain in Fig. ~ is modified
to symmetrically depict the amplitude of strain about a horizontal
line and plotted in Fig. 5. Appropriate allowance values are
added to values of each peak of the~ amplitude, and the upper side
peaks of the thus modified values of peaks are traced so as to
give a curve of UP-T as shown in Fig. 6. The reference symbol

7~
1 ~ -
UP-T means the top limit of allowable upper peaks of the amplitude
of strain. The upper peak of amplitude of strain measured must
not exceed the UP-T.
In the storing device 29, values of the UP-T in each stage
are stored at regular intervals. The intervals may be in the
order of a second or a fraction of a second.
H1-a, H2-a, H3-a, and H4-a mean control values of amplitude
of strain at optional times in each stage, which values are to be
compared with the values of measured strain at the corresponding
times. A reference symbol UP-B means the bottom limit of the
upper peak of the amplitude of strain in the clean-up stage.
In this stage, the amplitude of strain must appear
vehemently. Therefore, the values of upper peaks of amplitude of
strain must be between the UP-T and the UP-B.
From the chart representing the amplitude of strain of the
typical sample of dough in Fig. 5, the average values of the
strain at each measuring point are calculated to give a trend line
of the strain, and to which average values appropria~e allowance
values are added so that the range of control values of strain is
obtained. This range is shown by the curves BA-T and BA-B in ~ig.
7. The reference symbol BA-T means a top limit of the range of
allowable strain values, and the BA-B means a bottom limit of the
range of allowable strain values.
Curves UP-T and the UP-B in Fig. 7 are plotted from the chart

- 15
in Fig. 6 to be piled up on curve BA-T.
Similarly a curve LP-T means the top limit o~ allowable lower
peaks and a curve LP-B means the bottom limit of allowable lower
peaks. These curves are plotted to suspend -from curve BA-T.
Reference symbols H1-b, H2-b, H3-b, and H~-b mean control
values of amplitude of strain at the same points as the points
where H1-a~ H2-a, H3-a, and H4-a are indicated, respectively.
The measured values of strain must be between BA-T and BA-B,
and the values of upper peaks of amplitude must be between UP-T
and BA-T in the pick-up stage and the deve]opment stage. The
values of upper peaks of amplitude must be between UP-T and UP-B
in the clean-up stage, and the lower peaks of amplitude must be
between LP-T and LP-B.
When the kneading starts, the comparator begins to compare
the measured values of strain with the control values.
When the measured values are within the range of control
values at each predetermined measuring point, ~he comparator
provides the nex~ control values, and the kneading continues.
If the measured values deviate from the above-mentioned
range of control values, the comparator transmits a signal to stop
the drive device, or calculates a relevant time for subse~uent
kneading based on a logical decision derived from a program stored
in the computer.

.~ 73
- 16 -
The comparator simultaneously compares each time the measured
values, the average value of strain, an upper peak value of
amplitude, and a lower peak value of amplitude, with the control
values.
When the kneading proceeds to point E in the development
stage, the comparator transmits a signal to stop the drive device,
in accordance with a time program stored in the storing device.
In this case the resultant product has a desired quality.
The display device 26 indicates measured values as well as
control values during kneading, but this display device can be
omitted if the kneading is fully automated.
Although the control values for kneading materials are shown
as a standard diagram in Fig. 7, the time required for each stage
varies depending on the kind o-f wheat flour and materials 9 and
their composition.
Further, the temperature, pH value, and the amounts of salt,
sugar, and water, affect the time necessary -for kneading. Namely,
an increase of the temperature and a decrease of the pH value
shorten the time for kneading. An increase of the amount o~ the
salt also shortens the time for kneading. When materials absorb
less water, the time ~or kneading, especially, the time up to the
development stage, is relatively short.
To the contrary, a decrease in the temperature of the
material and an increase in the amount of sugar extend the time
,, , - '

3~
. . ~
for kneading. Further, when the material absorbs much water, the
time for kneading tends to extend.
Therefore, when the strain values measured do not reach the
range of control values at the development stage within the
standard time due to an inadequate formulation, the development
can be promoted by increasing the temperature of the material.
On the contrary, when the measured strain value is within the
range o~ control values, the comparator calculates the relevant
kneading time and transmits a signal to stop the drive of the
kneader.
Thus, the computer compares the individual measured data with
their standard values, to find dif-ferences between them, and makes
logical decisions on the basis o~ previously stored data, thereby
directing the best rotation speed of the agitating rod, directing
a temperature correction that must be timely made to end the
kneading operation at a proper temperature, indicating any
shortage of a material or materials or charging of a wrong
material, directing a charge in the duration of the kneading
operation, deciding the point at which to end the kneading
operation, and directing the kneading operation t o stop.
According to this embodiment, the following technical effects
are obtained:
The kneading conditions are easily monitored with the display

3~
- 18 -
device during kneading, thereby avoiding inadequate weighing o:~
materials, an excessive temperature increase, damage to the gluten
structure, etc.
The kneading operation of the bread dough and the like can be
automatically controlled.
Bread dough having an uni~orm and well-developed gluten
structure is automatically produced.
By the apparatus and method of this invention, described
above, the quality of dough that will be produced can be predicted
during the kneading operation. Therefore, to attain the desired
result, the operator can change or add a material or materials
midway through the kneading operation, or take the necessary
measures to correct an environmental factorg such as the
temperature, thereby preventing rejects. ~urther, on the basis of
stored data, the computer automatically adjusts the rotation speed
of the agitator of the kneading apparatus~ Also, the computer
decides when the kneading operation should end, and then
automatically stops the kneading operation.
.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2005-09-06
Letter Sent 2004-09-07
Grant by Issuance 1990-09-04

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (category 1, 7th anniv.) - standard 1997-09-04 1997-08-20
MF (category 1, 8th anniv.) - standard 1998-09-04 1998-08-19
MF (category 1, 9th anniv.) - standard 1999-09-06 1999-08-18
MF (category 1, 10th anniv.) - standard 2000-09-04 2000-08-16
MF (category 1, 11th anniv.) - standard 2001-09-04 2001-08-17
MF (category 1, 12th anniv.) - standard 2002-09-04 2002-08-16
MF (category 1, 13th anniv.) - standard 2003-09-04 2003-08-21
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
RHEON AUTOMATIC MACHINERY CO., LTD.
Past Owners on Record
TORAHIKO HAYASHI
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1993-10-08 1 16
Drawings 1993-10-08 7 102
Abstract 1993-10-08 1 18
Claims 1993-10-08 2 45
Descriptions 1993-10-08 18 555
Representative drawing 2001-08-30 1 13
Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-11-02 1 173
Fees 1996-08-19 1 71
Fees 1995-08-17 1 70
Fees 1994-08-19 1 68
Fees 1993-08-23 1 60
Fees 1992-07-14 1 29