Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
`~ ~.Z'78~75
- 1 - 6~421-338D
This application is a divisional of Canadian Patent
Application Serial No. 475,896 filed on March 7, 1985.
Background of the Invention
The present invention is directed to a system for
controlling water flow ultrasonically.
Water has taken its place with other commodities as an
object of conservation. Accordingly, numerous devices have been
proposed to aid in the conservation effort. Among the most
important devices for domestic use are those for restricting un-
necessary water flow. For instance, shower heads that decrease
the volume flow of wat~r while increasing its velocity to maintain
the effectiveness of the water flow can reduce water usage during
showers to a fraction of previous levels.
Another cause of wasted water is the flow of waterdurlng periods when it is not actually being used. For instance,
when dishes a~e being rinsed, it is not uncommon for the user to
allow the water to run in a steady stream even though the rinsing
only occurs intermittently. This is largely a result of the
inconvenience of turning the water on and off at frequent
intervals.
Accordingly, devices have been proposed that auto-
matically sense the proximity of an object to a faucet and operate
the faucet in response to the proximity. The intended result is
for the water to flow only when an object is actually below the
faucet. In addition to saving water, such devices eliminate the
need to operate a valve manually. Such an arrangement can be
~1~
::
.~ .
3Q75
- la - 64421-338D
beneficial to people whose hands are full, who are handicapped, or
who, like surgeons, cannot touch non-sterile objects after wash-
ing.
The devices heretofore proposed have employed optical
or electromagnetic sensing means, which, although possibly prac-
ticable, present certain design complexities and practical
difficulties. In the case of the
- . ,
~L;Z7~7~
electron,agnetic devices, there is a lack of directivity
in the sensors, and this presents obvious difficulties in
the dishwashing and rinsing situation. Optical devices,
on the other hand, can be quite directive. But it is
difficult to restrict their sensing ranges to prescribed
distances.
Other problems arise in some types of sensing
arrangements. For instance, when Doppler-type sensors
are used with stainless-steel sinks, flow can be
triggered unnecessarily when shocks and sound from
positions remote from the area of interest propagate into
the target region because of the propagation
characteristics of the stainless-steel sink.
Also, adoption of proximity-sensing devices for
domestic use is inhibited by the need to run wires to the
faucet. Although the power for such devices would
ordinarily be supplied at safe, low voltages, the
association of danger in the mind of the user with the
combination of water and electricity might make him
reluctant to adopt such a device.
It is accordingly an object of the present invention
to provide a means of object sensing that is less prone
to the design and utilization difficulties that beset
optical and electromagnetic devices.
An object of some of the aspects of the present
invention is to avoid difficulties presented by Doppler-
type devices.
An object of other aspects of the present invention
is to avoid the pyschological barrier caused by the use
3D of visible electrical connections.
~7~g)75
- 3 - 64421-338
Summary of the Invention
Various of the foregoing and related objects are
achieved in an ultrasonic flow-control system in which an ultra-
sonic transducer transmits ultrasound into a target region beneath
the outlet of a faucet and detects echoes from objects in the
target region to provide an indication to a control circuit of the
presence of the objects. The control circuit operates an
electrically operable valve in the faucet to control the flow of
water in accordance with whether or not objects are detected in
the target region.
Certain of the objects are achieved in a device that
first determines the distance of a detected object and then com-
pares the detected distance with a previously detected distance to
determine if any motion of the object is occurring. Motion is
thus detected without the difficulties that accompany Doppler-
shift devices. Flow is permitted only if motion of the object has
been detected.
- ~ Other objects are achieved in a device of this type that
includes a small turhine in the water flow and a generator mounted
on the faucet to be driven by the turbine. An energy-storage
device, such as a rechargeable battery, that can be recharged by
the generator is employed to power the control circuitry so that
it requires no external source of power. This eliminates the need
for the electric wires that can present a psychological barrier to
~ the adoption of such devices.
::
~ 7~3~7~i
- 3a - 64421-338D
The invention may be summarized as a flow-control
system comprising:
A. a conduit, aefining a fluid path, for directing
liquid along the fluid path;
B. an electrically operable valve interposed in the
fluid path and operable, by application of control signals there-
to, between an open position, in which it permits fluid flow in
the fluid path, and a closed position, in which it prevents fluid
flow therein;
C. an operational circuit electrically connected for
application of control signals to the valve to control the position
of the valve;
D. a turbine mounted in the fluid path for driving
by fluid flowing in the fluid path; and
:~ E. an electrical generator mechanically connected
'~
~; to the turbine to be driven thereby and electricallv connected to
the operational circuit to power it when the generator is driven
by the turbine.
; Brief Description of the Drawings
.
These and further features and advantages of the pre-
sent invention are described in connection with the accompanying
; drawings, in which:
'
' ,
,
~73~0~5
~IG. 1 is a side elevation of an embodiment of the
present invention; and
FIG. 2 is a largely sectional view of the turbine-
generator portion of the embodiment of FlG. l;
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view taken at line 3-3
of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the control circuitry
of the embodiment of FIG. l; and
FIG. 5 is a flow chart describing the criteria by
which the circuitry of FIG. 4 determines whether the
flow-control valve should be open or closed.
Detailed De6criptlon of the Preferred ~mbodiment
FIG. 1 depicts an ultrasonically-controlled faucet
' 10 having a valve 12 in its water stream that is
controlled by a magnetic actuator 14. The actuator 14 is
of the type that requires power only to change its state;
; no power is needed to keep the valve open or closed. The
state of the valve 12 is controlled by a control circuit
16 powered by a rechargeable nickel-cadmium battery pack
18. The control circuitry 16 is also connected to an
ultrasonic transducer 20 by means of wires concealed in
the faucet. The ultrasonic transducer transmits sound
into a region defined by dashed lines 22. The region
into which the ultrasound is transmitted by the
transducer 20 includes the area into which water normally
flows from the outlet 24 of the faucet 10.
A push button 26 is mounted on the front of the
~; faucet and electrically connec~ed by concealed wires to
the control circuit 16 so that the user can bring the
faucet into operation or turn it off by depressing the
~`~ push button 26. The assembly 10 also includes a
generator 28 that is driven, as will be described in more
:' ~
:::
~' .
7S
de~ail in connection wi~h FIGS. 2 and 3~ to recharge the
battery pack 18.
The assembly 10 is typically employed in a washbasin
having separate manual valves, not shown in the drawings,
for controlling the proportions of hot and cold water.
When the user initially depresses the push button 26 to
; begin operation, water flows for a predetermined duration
that is long enough to allow him to operate the valves
and thereby achieve the proper temperature. The valve
then closes automatically until the ultrasonic transducer
20, which is both a transmitting and receiving
transducer, detects a moving object in its sensing region
22 within a predetermined distance from the faucet. When
such an object is detected, the control circuit 16 opens
the valve and permits water to flow until motion within
the region stops. When motion is no longer detected, the
control circui~ 16 stops flow after a short delay. Thus,
if the user is washing dishes and moves a plate into the
region 22, water will flow to rinse the plate so long as
the plate is in the target region 22 and keeps moving.
Flow will stop a short time after the plate is moved out
of the region.
When the user is finished, he depresses the push
button 26, thereby removing power from the circuitry 16
and preventing the valve from opening in response to the
presence of objects within the sensing region 22.
Furthermore, if the circuitry 16 does not detect any
motion within the sensing region 22 for a predetermined
amount of time, say, five minutes, it turns itself off
automatically, and the subsequent presence of an object
within the sensing region ~2 will no longer cause wa'er
flow unless the push button 26 is again operated. Thi s
prevents the circuit from wasting power when ~he device
~7807$
is left on inadvertently, and it eliminates the danger of
unwanted water flow in an unattended faucet.
As was mentioned above, a generator assembly 28 is
provided so that the flow of water itself recharges the
battery pack 18 and thus eliminates the need to run
external wires to the faucet. Furthermore, the fa~cet is
preferably so constructed that the conventional faucet
can be unscrewed and removed and the faucet 10 of the
present invention installed without connecting any wires.
A generator housing 30 (FIG. 2) encloses a generator
31 driven by a shaft 32 on which is mounted a turbine 34
disposed in the water flow path. An ann~lar shoulder 36
is formed on the upper surface of the faucet, and a
gasket 38 is compressed between a cup-shaped shaft
bearing 40 and the shoulder 36. A second gasket 42 seals
between the annular upper surface of the bearing 40 and
the lower s~rface of the generator housing 30. Bolts 46
and 48 extend from the upper end of the generator housing
30 through holes in the gaskets 38 and 42 and bearing 40
to threadedly engage the annular sho~lder 36, thereby
holding the bearing 30 tightly in place and compressing
the gaskets 38 and 42.
A disk~shaped enlargement 50 of the generator shaft
32 compresses an O-ring 52 between itself and the lower
inner surface 54 of the bearing 40 to seal between the
generator shaft 32 and the opening 56 by which the shaft
32 extends through the lower end of the bearing 40. At
its other end, the generator shaft 32 is held in place by
a bushing 58 supported by a spider 60 formed as part of
the vertical portion of the faucet.
The turbine 34 is disposed in a narrowed region
defined by a thickened portion 62 of the faucet. The
turbine 34 includes four blades 64. Water flow causes
these blades to rotate in the counterclockwise direction,
'
'
~78~7S
- 7 - 6~42l-33~
as seen in FIG. 3, to generate electrical power that is applied to
the battery pack 18 by a charging circuit to recharge the
batteries.
A conceptual block diagram of the control circuit 16 is
presented in FIG. 4, in which the heart of the circuit is depicted
as a microprocessor circuit 66. In addition to a basic micro-
processor, element 66 includes memory and input/output devices of
the type usually used with the microprocessor chosen. The bat~
teries 68 in the battery pack 18 (FIG. 1) are connected to the
microprocessor 66 through the momentary switch 26, which is also
shown in FIG. 1.
A bypass line 70 bypasses the momentary switch 26 and
leads to a latch (not shown) internal to circuit 66 that can be
operated by the microprocessor. This latch is initially open so
that power from batteries 68 is not applied to the remaining
circuitry by way of bypass line 70. Consequently, the circuitry
lS not a drain on the batteries 68. When the momentary switch 26
is operated, the internal latch operates to keep power applied to
~' 20 the circuitry even after the momentary switch 26 opens again. A
subsequent operation of the momentary switch 26 while the internal
latch is closed is interpreted as a command to open the latch, and
power is removed from the circuit. Otherwise, the latch remains
closed, and power continues to be applied to the circuitry, so
long as the valve 12 is operated with some frequency. If the
- valve 12 remains closed for five minutes, though, the latch opens
:
~ again, removing power from the circui~ry so that it is not powered
.:.: :
~ until the pushbutton 26 is again operated.
~ .
~ ' ' ' ' .
,
2~ 75
- ~ - 64~21-338
The ~icroprocessor circuit 66 controls a valve control-
ler 72 that drives the valve actuator and thus changes the state
of the valve 12 in response to commands from the microprocessor
66.
The microprocessor 66 controls operation of the ultra-
sonic transducer 20 by operating an oscillator/amplifier 74, which
is connected to the transducer 20 through a switching network 76.
The lines by which the transducer is driven are the same as those
by which it returns received pulses, and switching circuitry 76 is
controlled by the microprocessor circuit 66, as line 80 suggests,
to switch among the several states. In one state, the switching
circuitry 76 connects the oscillator/amplifier to the ultrasonic
transducer 20 to drive it and thus transmit ultrasound. In the
next state, the switching circuitry 76 disconnects the oscil-
lator/amplifier 74 from the transducer 20 and generally isolates
the transducer 20 from the rest of the circuit. During this time,
the circuitry neither transmits nor "listens" for echoes from
objects in the transducer's sensing region 22. This avoids recep-
~` 20 tion of spurious echoes and ringing signals that are likely to
occur immediately after driving of the transducer 20 stops.
In the third state, the switching network 76 connectsthe transducer 20 to a detection circuit 82 that transmits a sig-
nal to the microprocessor 66 when the transducer 20 produces echo
signals above predetermined threshold levels. As those skilled in
the art will recognize, such circuits typical]y include time-
dependent gain controls to compensate for the high rate of ultra-
sound attenuation in air.
''~
- 9 - 64~21-33~
When the microprocessor initially causes the transducer
20 to transmit an ultrasound pulse, it resets one oE the counters
in a counter circuit 84 and enables it so that it begins counting
in response to pulses from a free-running clock 86. When the
first echo is received, the microprocessor disables the counter so
that it stops counting and retains the current count, which is
proportional to the distance of the transducer 20 from the object
that caused the echo.
FIG. 5 is a conceptual flow diagram illustrating the
criteria by which the control circuit determines when to open and
close the valve.
; The "start" circle 86 represents the point at which the
circuit is turned on by operation of the momentary switch 26. In
response, the circuitry performs initialization routines and opens
the valve 12, as block 88 indicates. Block 90 represents a
~ fourteen-second wait during which the water flows so that the user
; can adjust the temperature. The valve is then closed, as block 92
indicates, and the circuit goes into the closed-valve routine
represented by the rest of the first column of FIG. 5. There is a
half-second delay, represented by block 94, between each pulse
transmission. W~hen a pulse is transmitted, the circuitry measures
the time between the transmission and any resultant echo, as was
explained above. This function is represented by block 96.
The resultant measurement is stored in register A, as
block 98 indicates, and the circuitry then determines whet'ner the
contents of register A are within a range that represents the
farthest d~stance at which the device is designed to respond ~to
~:
B7~
- l~ - 6~2L-33~
the presence of an object. Typically, this distance will be some-
what less than the distance to the bottom of the sink but greater
than the distance at which a dish to be rinsed will ordinarily be
held.
If the distance is not within the predetermined range,
the routine returns to the half-second wait represented by block
94 and repeats the ]oop. If the distance is within the range, the
routine executes a half--second wait and then transmits another
pulse, as blocks 102 and 104 indicate. Block 106 represents the
step of storing the result in a second register, register B, and
decision block 108 represents testing the contents of register B
to determine whether the most recent measured distance is within
the predetermined range. If not, the routine returns to the point
represented by block 102. Otherwise, the contents of registers A
and B are compared, as decision block 110 indicates. The contents
of registers A and B typically represent the measurements from the
two most recent ultrasound pulses. If the decision block 110 has
been reached, the contents of registers A and B are both within
range, and, if they are equal, then the object has not moved dur-
ing the intervening half second by more than a distance that is
less than the system resolution. Of course, it may be desired to
permit more movement than this, and the test would then be whether
the difference be~ween the contents of registers A and B is less
than a predetermined number. However, it may be more convenient
to tailor the system resolution to the predetermined tihresllold for
movement.
~:
, ~ .
~: ,
:;
,,,,,, ~
~;~7~9Q7S
- 1] - 6~4~L-33~
Occasionally, the test represented by block 110 does not
represent the two most recent measurements. For instance, when
the result of the test represented by block 110 is negative, the
routine repeats the loop represented by blocks 102-110, and it
continues in this loop untiL the contents of register B are in
range and different from the contents of register A. Although the
two most recent measurements are not compared, -the test is accept-
able because a positive result of the test represented by block
110 still is an indication that an object is within the target
range and movement has occurred.
If the test represented by block 110 has a positive
resul-t, an index X is set to a value of three, as block 112 indi-
cates, and the valve is opened. The index X is used in providing
the delay bétween a failure to detect motion and the closing of
the valve 12 .
The routine then proceeds to the open-valve portion
depicted in the second column of FIG. 5, as blocks 114 and 116
indicate. Another measurement is then made and the result stored
20 in register A, as blocks 118 and 120 indicate. Block 122 repre-
sents testing the resultant value to determine whether or not it
is in range. The contents of register A are also tested to deter-
mine whether tney differ from the contents currently stored in
register ~, as block 124 indicates. If the result of either of
these tests is neqative, the routine proceeds to the steps
represented by block 126, in which the index X is decremented by
one, and block 128, in which X is tested to determine whe~her or
; not its value is zero. If lts value is zero, then the intended
:
~ 27i~7~
- l2 ~ 21-33~
delav is complete, and the valve is closed, as block g2 indicates.
The program then returns to its closed-valve portion. If the test
represented by block 128 reveals that X is not yet equal to zero,
the routine returns to the step represented by block 116.
If the results of both of t'ne tests represented by
blocks 122 and 124 are positive, then the index X is set equal to
three again, as block 130 indicates, and the system waits a half
second, makes another measurement, and stores the result in regis-
ter B, as blocks 132-136 indicate. The contents of register B are
tested to determine if they are in range and are then compared
with the contents of register A, as blocks 138 and 140 indicate.
If the result of either of these tests is negative, the index X is
decremented by one, as block 126 indicates, and X is again tested
to determine whether or not it is equal to zero, as block 128
indicates.
. ~ Thus, after three successive negative tests to detect
in-range moving objects, the index X will have been decremented to
zero, and the valve will be closed. If the system fails to detect
movement ~or only a second, the valve will remain open if movement
wlthin the range is detected soon t'nereafter. This time delay
associated with the index X eliminates the excessive operation of
the valve 12 that might otherwise occur in response to intermit-
tent movements of dishes in the sensing region 22.
If the results of both of the tests represented by
blocks l38 and 140 are positive, the index X is set eqlial to
three, as block 142 indicates, and the open-valve portion of the
,~
~ routine begins a~ain.
:
,
~z~
- l3 - ~,~421-J3~3
The flow cihart of FIG. 5 does not depict a determination
of whether the valve has been inactive for too long a time. How-
ever, such a routine runs concurrently with the routine of FIG.
5, which is interrupted to cause t'ne system to shut down if the
valve remains closed for more than five minutes. The routine
ernploys a second counter in counter circuit 84. This counter is
reset whenever the valve 12 closes and begins counting when the
valve opens. If the five-minute period mentioned above elapses
without a valve opening, this counter reaches a predetermined
count that causes the microprocessor to release the internal latch
that keeps power applied to the circuit 16. This action turns off
the circuit and prevents any further actuation of the valve 12
until the momentary switch 26 is operated again.
The preferred embodiment of the invention described
above employs both distance and movement criteria to determine
whether or not to open the valve. With a movement criterion' a
stationary object, such as a was'n basin does not cause the faucet
to turn on.~ Of course, a fQrk thàt the~user wants to rinse is
also a stationary object if the ùser is not moving it. However,
there will normally be enough movement of the object to be rinsed
so that the unit will be activated. Additionally~ a user will
quickly becollle accustomed to the fact that some movement is
required in order to activate the devicej and this rnovement
readily beco~es a habit that causes no inconvenience. On the
other han-l, it would be quite inconvenient if the devlce were to
;~ ~ be activated by the mere presence of, say, a stationary wash basin
::
:~
. ~;
~:7~S
- 13a - ~421-33~
or dishes stacked high enough to be within the distance range of
the system.
Witll the motion-detection requirement, there is no abso-
lute necessity for the additional requirement, set out above, that
the echo be caused by an object within a predetermined distance
from the faucet. However, I believe that this range requirement
furtner eliminates possible spurious responses without any
significant reduction in the usefulness of the device.
It should be noted that the preferred embodiment of my
device does not employ the ~requency-change determination used by
Doppler-type devices; instead, it subtracts different measured
times. This is an advantage because a Doppler-type device might
be activated erroneously by running water. Furthermore, vibra-
tions of, for instance, the sink bottom could cause erroneous
operation in sensitive Doppler-type devices because high-frequency
vibrations might cause considerable Doppler-effect frequency
~ .
change despite the undetectably small magnitude of the vibrations.
On the other hand, although the movements of dishes are compara-
tively large in distance, their velocities are not typically great
enough for detection by any but the most sensitive Doppler-effect
~ ~ .
~ devices, and the most sensitive devices are the
:' .
:
~Z~8~75
1~
ones most subject to erroneous operation. Thus,
detecting motion by measuring distance changes rather
than by employing the Doppler effect provides
considerable advantages.
S Many of the advantages of the present invention can be
obtained in embodiments that differ somewhat from the
preferred embodiment illustrated in the drawings. For
instance, although I believe that the provision of a
self-contained power source provides significant
advantages for home use, it might be found that an
external power so~rce is acceptable in public restrooms,
hospital scrub rooms, and industrial locations generally.
Furthermore, although I prefer decision criteria based on
both motion and range, it is clear that many of the
advantages of the invention are afforded even if only the
motion requirement is employed. On the other hand,
although I greatly prefer the motion criterion, simple
proximity can be used as a criterion in some specific-
p~rpose installations in which the presence of an object
in the target region is unlikely to occ~r when water flow
is not desired.
; Thus, the benefits of the present invention can be
obtained in a wide variety of embodiments.
::
.
