Language selection

Search

Patent 1293468 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1293468
(21) Application Number: 1293468
(54) English Title: TREATMENT OF SLOP OILS
(54) French Title: MODE DE TRAITEMENT DE REJETS DE FABRICATION DE PRODUITS PETROLIERS
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10G 33/04 (2006.01)
  • B01D 17/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KESSICK, MICHAEL A. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • ALBERTA ALKALI PETROLEUMS LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • ALBERTA ALKALI PETROLEUMS LIMITED (Canada)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1991-12-24
(22) Filed Date: 1988-10-26
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Slop oils, both refinery and field, are treated to
recover oil therefrom. The water-in-oil emulsion of the
slop oil first is inverted to an oil-in-water emulsion
by contact with a non-ionic surfactant and oil is
removed from the oil-in-water emulsion.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an
exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined
as follows:
1. A method of treatment of slop oil to recover oil
therefrom, which comprises:
contacting said slop oil with at least one non-
ionic surfactant to form an oil-in-water emulsion, and
removing oil from said oil-in-water emulsion.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said oil removal step
includes raising the pH of said oil-in-water emulsion to
about pH 12 to form a coalesced oil phase, and removing
said coalesced oil phase.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein said slop oil
comprises a water-in-oil emulsion having a BS&W content
of about 10 to about 90%.
4. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein said slop
oil comprises refinery slop oil and said refinery slop
oil is contacted with sodium carbonate prior to contact
with said non-ionic surfactant.
5. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein said slop
oil is field slop oil and said field slop oil is diluted
with brine or fresh water prior to contact with said
non-ionic surfactant.
6. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein said slop
oil is refinery slop oil and said refinery slop oil is
contacted with an aqueous sodium carbonate solution at a
temperature above about 80°C.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said oil is removed
from the oil-in-water emulsion by centrifuging said oil-
in-water emulsion to break the emulsion and form a
coalesced oil phase, and separating the coalesced oil
phase.
8. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein said slop
oil is diluted with an aqueous medium in an amount of
about 10 to about 60 wt % of the slop oil during or
prior to said contact with said non-ionic surfactant.
9. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein said non-
ionic surfactant is contacted with said slop oil in the
form of an aqueous solution thereof.

10. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein said non-
ionic surfactant is contacted with said slop oil in the
form of an aqueous solution thereof and said non-ionic
surfactant is an alkyl phenyl polyethoxyethanol
surfactant having a cloud point above about 100°C.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


3~6~1
TREATME~T OF SLOP OIL
~he present invention relates to the treatment of
slop oil for the recovery of oil therefrom.
Refinery slop oil, particularly from heavy oil
refineries, typically comprises desalter cuff and
residue from solvent extraction, in the form of a water-
in-oil emulsion, which may range from 10 to 9~% in BS&W
content. Field slop oil i5 similar but tends to have
less calcium soaps. The aqueous component often is in
the form of brine.
Owing to its high viscosity, high BS&W slop oil
cannot be cleaned by centrifugation, even after addition
of as much as 30~ diluent. The stability of the
emulsion is believed to be caused by a significant
content of calcium and possibly iron soap type
surfactants that are probably calcium and iron salts of
asphaltic acids.
In accordance with the present invention, it has
been found possible to invert the water-in-oil emulsion
of slop oils to an oil-in-water emulsion by contacting
the slop oil with at least one non-ionic surfactant.
~ Once inversion of the emulsion has taken place, oil may
; be recovered from the oil-in-water emulsion, for
example, by centrifugation.
It usually also is desirable to raise the pH of the
emulsion following contact with the non-ionic
surfactant, usually to at least about 12, using any
convenient alkalinating agent, such as aqueous sodium
hydroxide. In this way, solid or semi-solid particles
that stabilize the water droplets in the water-in-oil
emulsion become highly negatively charged and disperse
into the continuous water phase of the inverted
emulsion.
Depending on the source of the slop oil, some
pretreatment may be desirable to promote inversion of
the water-in-oil emulsion. For field slop oils, simple
dilution with brine or water is sufficient and may not
be required for dilute slop oils. For refinery slop
~k
.

3~
oils, treatment with aqueous sodium carbonate solution
prior to contact with the surfactant, usually at
elevated temperature, promotes the inversion.
It is believed that the sodium carbonate reacts
with calcium soaps in the water-in-oil emulsion to form
calcium carbonate and sodium soaps, driven by the low
solubility of calcium carbonate. The sodium soaps so-
formed tend to stabilize oil-in-water emulsions, so that
the system inverts to a water-thin oil-in-water system.
The washing of the slop oil by the sodium carbonate
solution may be effected in any convenient manner, for
example, by simple mixing of the sodium carbonate
solution and then heating the mixture to an ele~ated
temperature. The temperature generally is above about
60C, typically about 80C.
A preferred procedure involves an initial reaction
of sodium carbonate with the slop oil followed by
triggering inversion to the oil-in-water emulsion by
subsequent addition of water containing a small amount
of surfactant.
The lower viscosity which results when the water-
in-oil emulsion inverts to form the oil-in-water
emulsion enables the emulsion to be centrifuged which,
combined with the lesser effectiveness of the sodium
soaps as emulsifiers, results in the emulsion breaking.
The soap-type materials and any clays and minerals are
removed as a solid phase, which may be further processed
by centrifugation, with or without chemical addition, as
required.
The oil phase can be recovered from the agueous
phase such as by skimming, and subjected to further
cleaning, if necessary or desired, or may be returned to
the refinery stream. The aqueous phase may be disposed
of or reused.
As noted earlier, another procedure which can be
used to separate the oil from the oil-in-water emulsion
is to adjust the pH of the emulsion to a highly alkaline
value, typically about 12, and then permit the emulsion
to stand for an extended period for the oil to separate

~ ~93~6~3
out into a discrete layer. Separation of the discrete
oil layer may be speeded up by centrifugation.
The amount of water added to the slop oil, in the
form of aqueous non-ionic surfactant solution and sodium
carbonate solution depends on the water content of the
slop oil itself and may range from about 10 to about 60
wt.% of the 510p oil.
The amount of surfactant required to form the oil-
in-water emulsion in accordance with the invention
varies depending on the sur~actant used and the quantity
of oil present in the slop oil. Typically, about 0.025
wt.% of non-ionic surfactant is sufficient.
Higher molecular weight members of the alkyl phenyl
polyethoxyethanol series of non-ionic surfactants having
a cloud point above 100C are more effective than lower
molecular weight members. Typical examples of useful
non-ionic surfactants are those sold under the
trademarks Triton X-405 and Igepal C0-897.
The invention is illustrated by the following
Examples:
Example l
200 ml of a refinery slop containing about 70% BS&W
was added to 200 ml of water containing 0.4 g of sodium
carbonate and 0.1 g of Triton X-165. On stirring the
mixture at 80C, an oil-in-water emulsion formed in
about 1 minute. The emulsion was stirred for l hour at
80C and then centrifuged at 1900 g for 30 seconds.
A typical 40 ml quantity produced 2.0 ml of solid
phase, 12 ml of an oil phase and 26 ml of an aqueous
phase. The oil phase was formed to have a BS&W content
of less than 25%. Further centrifugation of the oil at
about 60C at 1900 g for 30 seconds after addition of
20% diluent, decreased the BS&W content to less than
1.0%.
Example 2
400 g of refinery slop oil containing about 70%
BS&W was reacted with 40 ml of a 6~ solution of sodium
carbonate for ~ hour at 80~C with stirring. 160 ml of
water containing 0.1 g of Triton X-405 then was added.

~ ~ Z~346~3
Upon stirring, the emulsion inverted to an oil-in-water
one. After a further ~-hour stirring, the oil-in-water
emulsion was centrifuged for 30 seconds at 1900 G,
causing separation of a solids phase. The liquid layer
was decanted from the solids and placed in a containment
; vessel where it further separated into an oil layer and
a water layer. After standing for two hours, the oil
layer was found to have a BS&W content of less than 10%.
Example 3
10The procedure of Example 2 was repeated using
Igepal 897 as the non-ionic surfactant. Following
addition of the Igepal 897, the mixture was stirred for
10 minutes and the pH of the oil-in-water emulsion was
adjusted to about 12 with the addition of sodium
hydroxide and stirred for another 10 minutes.
On quiescent standing at 80 to 90C for twelve
hours, the mixture separated to provide greater than 90%
recovery of a clean oil layer ~less than 0.5% BS&W), a
water layer and a solids layer.
Example 4
200 ml of field slop from a heavy oil recovery
project was inverted to an oil-in-water emulsion by
agitation at 80c with an equal volume of 4% brine
containing O.lg of Igepal CO 8~0 surfactant. The pH of
the system was raised to 12 by addition of sodium
hydroxide and agitation was continued for a further two
minutes. Centrifugation of a sample at l900g for 30
seconds then caused separation of a solid phase and two
clearly defined liquid phases. The upper oil phase was
found to contain less than 0.5% BS&W.
In summary of this disclosure, the present
invention provides a novel method of treatment of slop
oils by treatment with non-ionic surfactants to cause
emulsion inversion, followed by oil r~covery from the
resulting less stable oil-in-water emulsion.
Modifications are possible within the scope of the
invention.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1293468 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2002-12-24
Letter Sent 2001-12-24
Grant by Issuance 1991-12-24

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (category 1, 6th anniv.) - small 1997-12-24 1997-09-19
MF (category 1, 7th anniv.) - small 1998-12-24 1998-09-01
MF (category 1, 8th anniv.) - small 1999-12-24 1999-09-21
MF (category 1, 9th anniv.) - small 2000-12-27 2000-12-13
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ALBERTA ALKALI PETROLEUMS LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
MICHAEL A. KESSICK
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1993-10-26 1 14
Claims 1993-10-26 2 53
Abstract 1993-10-26 1 29
Drawings 1993-10-26 1 16
Descriptions 1993-10-26 4 185
Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-01-21 1 179
Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-01-21 1 179
Fees 2000-12-13 1 52
Fees 1998-09-01 1 57
Fees 1997-09-19 1 58
Fees 1999-09-21 1 51
Fees 1996-09-24 1 49
Fees 1995-11-23 1 43
Fees 1994-09-13 1 27
Fees 1993-07-30 1 32