Language selection

Search

Patent 1295878 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1295878
(21) Application Number: 515415
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR PRODUCING FISH MEAT MATERIAL
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE FABRICATION D'UNE SUBSTANCE DE CHAIR DE POISSON
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 99/104
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A23L 17/00 (2016.01)
  • A22C 25/00 (2006.01)
  • A22C 25/20 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SWAFFORD, TOM C. (United States of America)
  • ZETTERLING, TOMAS (Sweden)
(73) Owners :
  • ALFA-LAVAL FOOD & DAIRY ENGINEERING AB (Sweden)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1992-02-18
(22) Filed Date: 1986-08-06
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
763,617 United States of America 1985-08-08

Abstracts

English Abstract



Abstract

The invention relates to a process for producing a deboned,
water washed fish meat material, more commonly called Surimi.
The raw fish material is headed, gutted and minced to a particle
size of about 3-4 mm. This minced material is then washed and
mixed using in-line mixer means, e.g. a static mixer or a pump,
and is washed and separated by using a centrifugal decanter,
e.g. a centrifugal clarifier having a horizontal axis, to a fish
meat dry solids content of about 20-27 %. This can then be
blended with cryoprotectants and other additives, frozen and
packed.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE
IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A continuous process for producing a deboned, water washed fish meat
material, comprising: mincing headed and gutted fish raw material to a
particle size of about 3-4 mm, mixing and washing the minced material with
water in an in-line mixer means, separating the mixture in a horizontally
disposed centrifugal decanter into a first fraction of fish meat having a dry
solids content of about 10-18% and a second fraction of waste water, and
further dewatering said first fraction of fish meat.
2. The process according to claim 1, further comprising straining said first
fraction of meat in a refiner having holes of about 1/2 to 1 1/2 mm in diameter
to thereby divide said first fraction into a refined fish meat fraction which
passes through the holes and a reject fraction which does not pass the holes,
and further dewatering said refined fish meat fraction to a dry solids content
of about 20-27%.
3. The process according to claim 1, further comprising dewatering the mixture
in the centrifugal decanter until a first fraction of fish meat with a dry
solids content of about 20-27% is obtained, straining said first fraction of
fish meat in a refiner with holes of about 1/2 to 1 1/2 mm in diameter and
blending the refined fish meat fraction with cryoprotectant additives before
storing same.
4. The process according to claim 1, further comprising straining the minced
material in a refiner having holes of about 1/2 to 1 1/2 mm in diameter prior
to the mixing and washing step and dewatering the first fraction of fish meat
obtained from the decanter to a dry solids content of about 22-27% and blending
said further dewatered fish meat with additives before storing.
5. The process according to claim 1, further comprising straining the minced
material in a refiner having holes of about 1/2 to 1 1/2 mm in diameter prior
to the mixing and washing step, separating and dewatering the fish mixture in
the centrifugal decanter into a first fraction of fish meat having a dry solids
content of about 20-27% and blending the said first fraction with additives
before storing the same.
6. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, further
comprising separating said second fraction of waste water in a high speed

- 6 -


centrifugal separator into a third fraction of recovered protein material and a
fourth fraction of waste water and blending said third fraction with said first
fraction of fish meat.
7. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, further
comprising separating said second fraction of waste water in a high speed
centrifugal separator into a third fraction of recovered protein material and a
fourth fraction of waste water and feeding the third fraction to an independent
process line to yield a deboned, water washed fish material.
8. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the
in-line mixer means is a pump.
9. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the
in-line mixer means is a static mixer, comprising a pipe having internal
baffles to create turbulence therein.

- 7 -

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


12~


Process for producin~ fish meat materlal

The present invention relates to a process for produclng a
deboned, water washed, fish material, usually called Surimi.
s




Surimi is a Japanese term for mechanically deboned fish meat
that has been thoroughly washed with water and then mixed wLth
additives, i.e. so-called cryoprotectants, for improved frozen
shelf life.
Surimi is used as an intermediate product for a variety of
fabricated seafoods~ such as flakes and crab legs. The aim of
washing with water is not only to remove fat and undesirable
matter, such a~ blood, plgments and odorous substances, but,
more impor~antly to increaae the concentration oE myoelbrillar
protein (actomyosin) thereby improving gel strength and elas-
ticity, essential properties for Surimi-based products.

Surimi has a great potential as a functional protein ingredient
which can be substituted for a variety of traditional animal
and vegetable proteins. The virtually unlimited resources of
underutilized fish species will ensure a sufficient production
of Surimi at a reasonable cost to meet the need for base
material for Surimi-based products.
In Japan, Surimi has been produced for several hundred years.
Traditionally, Surimi was freshly prepared from fresh fish and
immediately processed into a variety of products.

30 ` The technique evolved around A.D. 1100, when Japanese fishermen
discovered that they could keep the product longer if washed
minced fish was mixed with salt, ground up, and steamed or
broiled. The traditional Surimi production was run on a day-
to-day basis, depending on the supply of fresh fish. Conse-

quently, the Surimi industry could not expand to any great
:; :

:: ~

.

~ Sl~37~3


extent and remained in a limited capacity. However~ in 1959 atechnique to stabilize frozen Surimi was discovered. It was
found that an additive, i.e. a cryoprotectant, kept the Surimi
from freeze denaturation during frozen storage. This discovery
was the starting point for a rapid growth of Surimi production.
For additional information about the development of the conven-
tional process for production of Surimi, see Chong M. ~ee,
Surimi Process Technology , Food Technology, pp. 69-80
(November 1984).
Basically, Surimi is produced by repeatedly washing separated
fish ~eat with chilled water (5-10C) until it becomes odor-
less and colorless - that is to say, until most of the water-
soluble protein is removed. The temperature o~ the wash water is
determined by the species of fish utilized. Warm water fish can
tolerate a higher water temperature than cold water fish wlthout
a reduction in protein functionality. Originally, Suriml was
made in a manual batch process, with at least three washing
steps. Later, a commercial continuous process was developed. See
Fig. 1. The fish is headed, gutted and minced to a particle size
; of about 3-4 mm. The minced fish is mixed with the appropriate
amount of water in a ratio tank, and the mixture is pumped to a
washer, that is to say, a tank with an agitator, and is then
pumped to a rotating screen rinser, which comprises a cylindri-
cal mantle having holes of about l mm diameter. Water is sprayed
from the outside, and a flow of washed fish meat comes out of
the rinser. Water which passes through the holes of the screen
is discharged as waste. Usually there are three sets of washing
tanks and rinsers. The washed fish meat, with a dry solids
:
(D.S.~ content of about 10-18 %, is then refined in a strainer
;having holes of about 1/2-1 1/2 mm, diameter in a cylindrical
mantle. Horizontal shaft rotating blades drive the Incoming fish
meat toward the mantle, and pieces larger than the holes form a
re~ect fraction, whilst the refined fish meat passes through the
holes and is then dewatered in a screw press to a D.S. content



'
:.

,' '

lZ~ 378




of about 20-27 %. Thls dewatered cake is then blended with the
cryoprotectant additive, 4 % sugar, 4 % sorbitol and 0.2 % poly-
phosphates and is then frozen and packed as Surimi product.

This conventional Surimi process i8 still rather old fashioned,
even if it is continuous. There are many drawbacks inherent in
the process. The overall yield of valuable fish protein is qulte
low, as the losses in the rather inefficient washing steps are
large. The amount of water needed for washing is large. The fish
protein is exposed to air for a long time, which results in a
great amount of hydrolysis and deterioratlon of the Eish pro-
tein. The pLant for carrying out the process requires a large
floor area.

Accordingly, there i8 a need ~or an efELcLent process for pro-
ducing Surimi, which overcomes the above mentioned de~iciencies.
It is therefore an ob~ect of the present invention to provide a
continuous process, to produce Surimi in an efficient way, using
smaller amounts of washing water and exposing the fish protein
to air for shorter periods of time. It is a further object of
the present lnvention to provide a compact plant, requiring but
a small amount of floor space, for carrylng out the continuous
process.

In the process of the invention, the minced fish material is
mixed using in-line mixer means, e.g. a static mixer or a pump,
and is washed by using a centrifugal decanter, e.g. a centri-
fugal clarifier having a horizontal axisO The process according
to the invention increases the yield of Surimi by up to 50 %,
requlres the use of 25-50 % less washing water, requires a
shorter amount of time (about 1.5 mlnutes as compared to 15
mlnutes for the conventional process), requires less staff and
less space to perform, requires fewer components and results in
a higher quality product~, havlng hlgher gel-strength, lower
water content and~appearing whiter in color than product
produced by the conventional process.
:
,. ' : ~




--

7~3




The present invention relates to a process for producing a
deboned, water washed fish meat material, more commonly called
Surimi, in which the raw fish material is headed, gut~ed and
minced to a particle size of about 3-4 mm. The minced material
is washed with chilled water tmtil it becomes odorless and
colorless, and the washed material is then dewatered to a fish
meat having a D.S. coatent of about 18-22 %, which could then
be blended with additives such as sugar, sorbitol and poly-
; phosphates, frozen and packed.
10Fig. 1 illustrates a conventional process of making Surimi
(such as that described in the above-cited article from Food
Technology).

Fig. 2 depicts a process according to the invent:Lon wherein
minced fish is mixed with water and washed in ln-line ~ixer
means and separated in a centrlfugal decanter into a first
fraction of fish meat which is strained and further dewatered in
a screw press.
Fig. 3 depicts another process according to the invention where-
in minced fish is mixed with water and washed in in-line mixer
means and separated in a centrifugal decanter into a first frac-
tion of fish meat having a high dry solids conteat of 22-27 %
which is then straiaed.
:
Fig. 4 depicts another process according to the invention where-
in miaced fish is strained to remove bits of bone, tendon, skin
and other impurities, mixed with water and washed in in-line
mixer means and thereafter separated in a centrifugal decanter
:
;~ ~ into a first fraction of fish meat which is further dewatered in
a screw press.
, : :
Fig. 5 depict~ another~process according to the invention where-
in minced fish is strained, mixed with water and washed In in-


.~ :

, .




`

i8~




llne mixer means and separated in a centrifugal decanter into
a first fraction of fish meat having a high dry solids content
of 20-27 ~, to which fraction is added cryoprotectants and other
additives.




According to the invention the improvement over the conventional
process lies firstly in the washing of the minced fish material,
which is carried out by mixing a flow of minced material with
washing water in efficient in-line mixer means, such as a static
mixer (e.g., a pipe provided with internal baffles to create
turbulence) or a pump, and secondly in the dewatering of the
mixture so obtained in a centrifugal decanter with horizontal
axis~ to separate the mixture into a first fractlon of fish rneat
and into a second eraction of waste water, containing i~purltLes
and proteln losses which can be recovered Lf desired.

The second fraction of waste water can be further separated in a
high speed centrifugal clarifier into a third fraction of
recovered protein material and a fourth fraction of waste water.
The third fraction of recovered proteln material can be blended
with the first fractlon of flsh meat or can be handled in an
independent process line to yield a debonedJ wat~r washed fish
meat materlal.


Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1992-02-18
(22) Filed 1986-08-06
(45) Issued 1992-02-18
Expired 2009-02-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1986-08-06
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1988-01-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 2 1994-02-18 $100.00 1994-01-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 3 1995-02-20 $100.00 1995-01-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 4 1996-02-19 $100.00 1996-01-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 5 1997-02-18 $150.00 1997-01-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 6 1998-02-18 $150.00 1998-01-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 7 1999-02-18 $150.00 1999-01-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 8 2000-02-18 $150.00 2000-01-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 9 2001-02-19 $150.00 2001-01-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 10 2002-02-18 $200.00 2002-01-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 11 2003-02-18 $200.00 2003-01-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 12 2004-02-18 $200.00 2003-12-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 13 2005-02-18 $250.00 2005-01-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 14 2006-02-20 $250.00 2006-01-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 15 2007-02-19 $450.00 2007-01-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 16 2008-02-18 $450.00 2008-01-07
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ALFA-LAVAL FOOD & DAIRY ENGINEERING AB
Past Owners on Record
SWAFFORD, TOM C.
ZETTERLING, TOMAS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 2000-08-02 1 11
Description 1993-10-27 5 214
Drawings 1993-10-27 3 91
Claims 1993-10-27 2 79
Abstract 1993-10-27 1 19
Cover Page 1993-10-27 1 18
Fees 1997-01-20 1 69
Fees 1996-01-18 1 70
Fees 1995-01-19 1 70
Fees 1994-01-17 1 65