Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~2~3~i
- 1 - 6~6~ 297V
KNEE PROSTHESIS
Primary total knee ar-throplasty, in which the natural
femoral and tibial condylar bearing surfaces are replaced for the
first time with prosthetic femoral and tibial components, has been
practiced for many years with a high rate of success using a
variety of different designs for -the primary femoral and tibial
components. It is usually preferred, if possible, to preserve the
lateral and media~ collateral ligaments during primary total knee
arthroplasty and implant non-linked femoral and tibial components
10 in order to preserve the stability and freedom of motion of the
repaired joint. Examples of non-linked primary components highly
suitable for use in cases in which the surgeon is able to preserve
functioning lateral and medial collateral ligaments are disclosed
in U.S. Patents 3,728,742, 4,081,866; 4,209,861 and in the co-
pending, commonly assigned Canadian patent Application Serial No.
421,731, filed February 16, 1983, entitled "Bone Prosthesis with
Porous Coating". In a rare number of cases, usually associated
with improper surgical alignment of the primary components or the
development after primary arthroplasty of severe conditions of
arthritis or infection at the knee joint, it may become necessary
to replace the originally implanted primary prosthetic components
with a set of replacement femoral and tibial components, l.e. to
practice revision total knee arthroplasty.
1~;
3~
--2--
Revision total knee arthroplasty necessarily
involve~ the removal of additional bone tissue
(beyond the bone tissue removed for the primaxy
arthroplasty~ from the distal end of the femur
5 (including the posterior region thereof) and the
proximal end of the tibia in the preparation of
these bones for implantation o the revision
components. Prior to the present invention, the
usual practice in cases in which the collateral
ligaments are preserved has been to implant a primary
type of femoral component having a spaced pair of
bearing members as the revision component and to
restore the full natural length of the patient's
leg in extension by utilizing an appropriately-
dimensioned revision tibial component having aspaced pair of bearing members that are much
thicker than those of the replaced primary tibial
component. The ef~ect of this prior art practice
is to shit the transverse joint plane, the horizontal
plane passing through the lateral and medial component
contact areas, in a proximal direction with respect to the
normal anatomical transverse joint plane and to displace
the femoral component anteriorly with respect to the natural
anatomical distal femur. The prosthetic knee joint is
stable in extension but unstable in high flexion,
e.g. 90 flexion, because of the unnatural shortening
of the collateral ligament length in high flexion
resulting from the uncompensated bone removal in the
posterior re~ion of the distal femur effected in
preparation for implantation of the revision femoral
component.
It is an object of the present invention to
provide a method for replacing a previously implanted
total knee prosthesis while retaining the lateral
3~
~3- 64~80-297D
and medial collateral ligaments intact and functional, the
practice of which results in a revised prosthetic knee joint
that is stable in extension and flexion and affords a relative
movement in use between joint components that is similar to that
in the natural human knee.
The invention provides a kit for use in the surgical re-
placement in a patient of a previously implanted knee joint
prosthesis comprising an implanted femoral component and an
implanted tibial component, said kit comprising a plurality of
revision tibial components comprising a spaced pair of bearing
members adapted to fit when implanted against the surgically
prepared proximal tibia and a plurality of revision femoral
components comprising a spaced pair of bearing members adapted
to fit when implanted against the surgica~ly prepared distal
femur, with the bearing members of each of said revision
femoral components being adapted for mutual non-linked articul-
ation with the bearing members of each of said revision tibial
components, and the bearing members of each of said revision
femoral components including a distal portion adapted to contact
an associated revision tibial component bearing member when the
prosthetic knee joint is in extension and a posterior portion
adapted to contact an associated revision tibial component bear-
ing member when the prosthetic knee joint is in flexion, with
the thickness of the bearing members of each of said revision
tibial components being different and with the thickness o~ the
~Z5~l~43~
-~- 64600-297~
poster.ior bearinc3 portions o each of saic1 revlsion femor~l
components being the same and the tllickness oE tlle di~tal bearing
portion~ of each of said revision femoral component~ beillg
diEferent.
3~ J
--5
The various aspects of the present invention will be
described in detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments
thereof. Reference to these embodiments does not limit the scope
of the invention, which is limited only by the scope of the
claims.
In the drawings:
FIGURE l is a schematic plan view taken in an anterior-
posterior plane of an implanted prior art revision knee prosthesis
showing the proximal displacement of the transverse joint plane
ld and the an~erior displacement of the femoral component;
FIGURES 2 and 2A are schematic plan views taken in an
anterior-posterior plane showing how the implantation of the prior
art prosthesis of FIGURE l leads to excessive ligamental la~ity
and joint instability in flexion of the joint;
FIGURES 3 to 5 are side, top and rear elevation views,
respectively, of a revision femoral component suitable for use in
the present invention;
FIGURES 6, 7 and 8 are top, rear and side elevation
views, respectively, of a revision tibial component suitable for
use in the preser.t invention, with FIGURE 7 being partially in
half-section;
FIGURES 9 and 9A (on the first sheet) are schematic
plan views comparable to FIGURES 2 and 2A and showing the benefi-
cial results of the practice of the present invention;
FIGURES 10 to 13 are front, top, side and bottom eleva-
tion views, respectlvely, of a cutting jig suitable for use in the
preparation of the distal end of a femur for the implantation of a
femoral component oE a revision knee prosthesis;
:
3~JI J
--6--
FIGURES 14, 15 and 16 are front, side an~ bottom eleva-
tion views, respectively, of an intramedullary rod adapted for use
with the cutting jig of FIGURES 10 to 13;
FIGURE 17 depicts various anatomical references of
interest (left leg, front view) in relation to the present inven-
tion;
FIGURES 18 to 24 illustrate the preparation of the distal
end of a patient's femur for the implantation of the revision
femoral component of FIGURES 3 to 5;
FIGURES 25 is a perspective view of an implanted revision
knee prosthesis comprising femoral, tibial and patellar components;
and
FIGURES 26 and 27 (on the fifth sheet) are side and top
elevation views, respectively, of a drill guide suitable for use
in the preparation of the distal end of a femur for the implanta-
tion of a femoral component of a revision knee prosthesis.
A prior art revision knee prosthesis is shown schematical-
ly in FIGURE 1. This prosthesis comprises a femoral component 103
secured to the patient's right femur F and a tibial component 105
secured to the patient's right tibia T. The lateral and medial
collateral ligaments of the knee joint of FIGURE 1 have been pre-
served intact and functional. The curved dotted line in FIGURES 1
and 2 represents the shape of the unresected natural femur. Femoral
component 103 and tibial component 105 each comprise a spaced pair
of bearing members adapted for mutual non-linked articulation in
use. As used herein, the term "non-linked" means that the two com~
ponents are capable of being fully separated without having to first
disassemble or deform one or both of the components or mbve the
:~L25~ 3~
-6a-
components into a relative disposition not encountered in the
normal motion of the artificial joint in the patient's body. ~se
of non-linked femoral and tibial components, together with preser-
vation of the collateral ligaments, is usually a preferred course
of action, if feasible, in both primary and revision total knee
arthroplasty in order to permlt natural
3~ ~
--7--
movement of the prosthetic knee joint and prevent
the devèlopment of excessive stresses at prosthesis
~ixation interfaces.
The disad~antages of utilizing a primary type of
femoral component 103 in revision arthroplasty is
clearly shown in FIGS. 1, 2 and 2A. Because of the bone
loss incurred in the preparation of the distal femur
for the implantation of femoral component 103, which
bone loss is not compensated for by the shape of said
femoral component, the implanted component 103 is
shifted proximally (by a distance Dl) and anteriorly
(by a distance D2) with respect to the natural
anatomical distal femur. Accordingly, the transverse
joint plane, which is the horizon~al plane perpendicular
to the plane of FIG. 1 passing through the lateral and
medial contact areas bet~een components 103 and 105, is
displaced proximally with respect to the normal anatomical
transverse joint plane. The natural anatomical length of
the patient's right leg and the natural extended length
and degree of tension of the collateral ligaments is
restored in extension by adjusting the thickness of the
revision tibial component bearing members (see FIG. 2
in which only the medial collateral ligament M is visible).
However, during substantial flexion of the prosthetic joint
25 (to _ ~ 90~ flexion as shown in FIG. 2A), the length of
the ligaments (and thus also their tension) decreases by
a far greater amount tL2) than in the normal anatomic
knee (Ll). This decrease in ligamental length, which
is caused primarily by the bone loss in the distal
posterior femur, can lead to detrimental ligamental
laxity and joint instability in the flexed revised
prosthetic knee joint and further anterior displacement
of the femoral component xelative to the tibia.
Additionally, the fact that the revised knee bends at
a non-anatomical hinge axis places unnecessary stresses
upon ~he tibial and femoral component fixation surfaces
and leads to unnatural relative motion between said
components.
A revision ~emoral component 3 (right knee) suitable
for use in ~he present invention is shown in FIGS. 3 to 5.
Component 3 comprises a spaced pair of bearing members
7 and 9, a portion 11 bridging said ~earing members, and a
fixation post 13 adapted to Eit within the ~emoral intra-
medullary canal. As shown in the top plan view of FIG.
~, lateral bearing member 9 is substantially straight
while medial bearing member 7 is slightly curved to
more readily permit axial rotation of the tibia during
flexion. The lower surfaces o~ bearing members 7 and 9
15 which contact the tibial component 5 in use are sub-
stantially flat when viewed in lateral-medial planes
(see FIG. 5~. The configurations o~ members 7 and 9
in top plan and rear plan views are not critical to
the practice of the present invention.
Bearing members 7 and 9 are substantially
identical as viewed in anterior-posterior planes such
as the plane of FIG. 3, with their lower tibial component-
contacting surfaces shaped in such planes to approximate
the shape of the natural femoral condylar sur~aces.
Each of said members contains a distal portion 15 adapted
to contact the tibial component when the prosthetic
knee joint is in extension and a posterior portion 17
adapted to contact the tibial component when the
prosthetic knee joint is in flexion. Pre~erably, as
shown in FIG. 3, each of bearing members 7 and 9 also
includes an anterior portion 19 adapted to contact a
revision prosthetic patellar component 150 (see
FIG. 25) during use of the prosthetic joint. The
anterior and distal portions 19 and 15 of bearing
members 7 and 9 and bridging portion 11 form together
a track 23 tha~ fits over a cooperating ridge on the
patellar component. Track 23 is slightly angled laterally
from the vertical. As will be explained later in greater
detail, the thickness of distal portion 15 and posterior
portion 17 of bearing members 7 and 9 in anterior-
posterior planes is of great importance in the practice
o~ the present invention. The thickness of distal
bearing portion 15 is measured from horizontal surface
27 downwardly to the tibial component-contacting
surface of the distal bearing portion, while the thick-
ness of posterior bearing portion 17 is measured from
vertical plane P at the posterior edge of surface 27
posteriorly to the tibial component-contacting surface
of the posterior bearing portion.
As is obvious from FIG. 3, it is the lower surfaces
of bearing members 7 and 9 that contact the tibial and
patellar components in use. The upper surfaces of
members 7 and 9 combine with the upper surface of
bridging portion 11 to form a three-planed fixation
surface for component 3 including a posterior planar
surface 25, a distal planar surface 27 and an anterior
planar surface 29. (Note that if component 3 contains
a slot 31 between members 7 and 9 to allow for
preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament, bridging
portion 11 does not contribute to posterior planar
fixation surface 25.) The planes o each of surfaces
25, 27 and 29 are perpendicular to anterior-posterior
planes. Distal fixation surface 27 is horizontal when
the prosthetic knee joint is in extension, and fixation
surfaces 25 and 29 are oriented at obtuse angles,
preferably about 10~.5 and 101~ respectively, with
respect to fixation surface 27. Planar i~ation sur-
faces 25, 27 and 29 are adapted to fit against co-
3~ --
--10--
inc-ding surEaces on the prepared distal femur when
revision femoral component 3 is implanted. Preferably,
a porous coa~ing of the kind disclosed in the above-
mentioned copending Canadian Pa~ent Application Serial No.
421,731 is provided on most or all of surfaces 25, 27
and 29 and the outer surface of fixation post 13, and
the fixation to the femur is accomplished by either
tissue ingrowth or cementation. Note that fixation
post 13 is angled at about 8 from the vertical
in a lateral direction as viewed in the lateral-
medial plane of FIG. 5 and is angled at about 2 1/2
~rom the vertical in an anterior direction as viewed
in the anterior-posterior plane of FIG. 3~
The particular configuration of the revision tibial
component is not critical to the practice of the inven-
tion. One revision tibial component 5 suitable for use
in the present invention, which may be implanted at
either the left or right proximal tibia, is shown in
FIGS. 6 to 8. Alternatively, a primary type of tibial
component such as the one disclosed in the afore-
_ ~ mentioned Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 421,731may be employed. Tibial component 5 is an assembly of a
bearing insert 41 secured to a tibial tray 43 by conven-
tional means, e.g. by snap-fit of tray projections within
resilient insert openings~ The lateral and medial side
parts of insert 41 and the two extensions of tray 43
supporting said two side parts form together the two
identical bearing members 45 and 47 of component 5~ which
are separated by raised central member 49. The upper
surfaces of bearing members 45 and 47 which contact the
femoral bearing members 7 and 9 in use are generally
dish-shaped and both include (as shown in FIGS. 7 and
8) a flat central region 46 removed from the anterior
and posterior peripheries of said upper surfaces.
$i~
Region 46 is horizontal as viawed in lateral-medial
planes (see FIG. 7) and very slightly sloped (preferably
by about 1 to about 2) in a downward/posterior ~ashion
as viewed in anterior-posterior planes (see FIG. 8).
The lower surface 51 of tibial tray 43 is flat and
adapted to fit against a coinciding horizontal surface
on the prepared pro~imal tibia when revision tibial
component 5 is implanted. Tibial tray 43 includes a
fixation peg 53, and a series of slots, e.g. 55,
surrounding peg 53 to faciliate removal of the tibial
component, if necessary (see said copending Canadian
Patent Application Serial No. 421,731). If preserva-
tion of the posterior cruciate ligament is desired,
tibial component 5 is provided with a posterior slot
between bearing members 45 and 47 and underlying the
slot 31 of component 3 at extension of the prosthetic
joint. Preferably, a porous coating of the kind
disclosed in the above-mentioned copending Canadian
Patent Application Serial No. 421,731 is provided on
most or all of surface 51 and the outer surface of
fixation peg 53, and the fixation to the tibia is
accomplished by either tissue ingrowth or cementation.
Femoral component 3 and tibial tray 43 are pre-
ferably made of a corrosion resistant surgical implant
alloy, e.g. titanium or a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy
(e g. Vitallium (Howmedica, Inc.; New York, N.Y.~) and
tibial bearing insert 41 is preferably made of a biologi-
cally compatible high density polymer such as high
molecular weight polyethylene. Preferably, component
3 and tray 43 are made by casting (followed by addition
of the porous coating by sintering) and inSeLt 41 iS made
by machining.
36
~J
-12-
The beneficial results stemming from the practice
of the present invention can be readily understood by
comparing the schematic drawings of FIGS. 2 and 2A
~prior art) and FIGS. 9 and 9A (present invention3,
with further reference to FIG. 3. On the femoral side,
the ultimate goal is to substantially restore the anatomical
geometry of the distal end of the patient's pre-existing
natural femur. In order to compensate for the distal femur
bone loss occuring during the revision arthroplasty, a
revision femoral component 3 is selected in which the
distal bearing portion 15 is thicker (as measured from
horizontal surface 27 downwardly to the tibial component-
contacting surface) than the corresponding distal
bearing portion in the primary femoral component being
replaced and the posterior bearing portion 17 is thicker
tas measured from vertical plane P at the posterior edge
of surface 27 posteriorly to the tibial Gomponent-
contacting surface) than the corresponding posterior
bearing portion in said primary femoral component. The
bearing members of the tibial component 5 will typically
have roughly the same thickness as in the primary tibial
component being replaced, although some increase in
thickness is usually necessary to compensate for the
proximal tibia bone loss involved in the revision
arthroplasty. When components 3 and 5 are properly
selected, the natural anatomical transverse joint plane,
collateral ligament length and collateral ligament
tension and balance are essentially restored in extension
and throughout the full range of intended fl~xion of the
prosthetic joint (typically 0 to 120 of flexion). As
a result, the prosthetic knee joint is stable in
extension and flexion without the relative motion of
the femoral and tibial components being excessively
constrained, the revision prosthetic knee is able to
reproduce the motion of the normal anatomical knee,
and stresses at fixation interfaces are minimized.
3~ J
-13-
In the present application, when it is said that a bear-
ing member or bearing member portion of one prosthetic component
is thicker or has greater thickness than the corresponding mem~er
or portion of another prosthetic component, it is m~ant that -the
bearing member or bearing member portion o~ the one component has
a greater mean thickness tas determined over the full extent of
the member or portion as viewed in anterior/posterior planes~ than
has the corresponding member or portion of the other component.
The thickness of femoral bearing member portions 15 and tibial
1~ bearing members 45 and 47 includes the thickness of any fixation
coatings or layers on surfaces 27 and 51.
In the surgical procedure for implanting the revision
femoral and tibial components according to the present invention,
much of the instrumen-tation disclosed in the co~ending, commonly
assigned Cana~ian Patent Application Serial No. 421,731,filed
February 16, 1983, entitled "Prosthetic Knee Implantation" can be
employed. In addition, instrumentation particularly adapted for
use in revision knee arthroplasty, including the instrumentation
illustrated in FIGURES 10 to 16, 26 and 27 of the present appli-
cation, can also be beneficially utilized.
A revision cutting jig 61 highly suitable for use in the
preparation of the distal end of the right or left femur in
revision arthroplasty is shown in FIGURES 10 to 13. As is best
seen in the side view of FIGURE 12, cutting jig 61 includes a body
portion 63 having substantially the shape of a trapezoidal prism
defined by distal base face 67, proximal base face 62 parallel to
face 67, anterior side cutting face 65 and posterior
,3~
-14-
side cutting ~ace 66. For reasons that will become clear
when the use of cutting jig 61 is described below, cutting
faces 65 and 66 form obtuse angles with distal face
67 and divexge from one another in the proximal direction
(l.e. from face 67 to face 62). Jig 61 also includes
means on proximal ~ace 62, e.g. teeth 141, 142, 143 and
144 projecting from recessed regions on face 62, for
temporarily securing jig 61 to the distal end of the
patient's femur; means within body portion 63, e.g.
dovetail slot 81 open at proximal face 62 and the two
end faces 71 and 72 of body portion 63, for the connection
to said body portion of a cylindrical rod (described
below) adapted to be positioned within the intramedullary
canal of the emur; means, e.g. holes 83 and 85 through
body portion 63, for the releasable attachment o a
distally-extending handle to said body portion; means,
holes 73 and 75 commencing at recessed regions on
anterior cutting face 65 and opening into dovetail slot
81, for the releasable attachment of an anteriorly-extending
pin holder alignment guide to body portion 63; and a
dog-legged tongue 77 extending from anterior cutting
face 65. Note that h~les 73 and 75 are of different
sizes so that the correct position o~ the pin holder
alignment guide on jig 61 cannot be improperly reversed.
Tongue 77 includes two sections 78 and 80, with section
80 extending in the proximal direction to the free end
of tongue 77 being perpendicular to the planes of base
faces 62 and 67. Jig 61 is also provided with a depression
86 in distal face 67 which is adapted to receive a corre-
sponding pin on the distally-extending handle so as to
improve the stability of the attachment o said handle to
jig 61.
A cylindrical intramedullary rod 91 adapted for use
in combination with revision cutting ]ig 61 is shown
in FIGS. 14 to 16. Rod 91 comprises a main cylindrical
~2~ 3~
-15-
body portion 93 adap~ed to be posit.ioned within the
intramedullary canal of the patient's femur, a pair
of flanges 95 and 97 at the distal end of rod 91, and
a reduced portion 99 between fl~nges 35 and 97. Rod
91 is adapted to be connected to cutting jig 61 by sliding
the distal end of rod 91 into dovetail slot 81, with
the two ridge-like projections in slot 81 (see FIGS.
ll and 12) received within reduced portion 99 to prevent
the escape of said distal end through the opening of
slot 81 at face 62 (from right to left in FIG. 12).
When cutting jig 61 and intramedullary rod 91 are
further combined with a pin holder alignment guide,
movement of rod 91 in a lateral or medial direction,
i.e. into or out of the plane of FIG. 12, can be limited
or prevented by assuring that the fixation pegs of the
pin holder alignment guide (which are received within
holes 73 and 75 in body portion 63 when the alignment
guide is attached to jig 61) are long enough to extend
into the dovetail slot 81 and thereby restrict the
movement of flange 95 of rod 91. Note that in the
embodiment of cutting jig 61 shown in FIGS. 10 to 13
recesses 87 and 88 are provided in the distal wall of
slot 81 to accomodate portions of the two pin holder
alignment guide fixation pegs. When the cutting jig
61 and intramedullary rod 91 shown in FIGS. 10 to 16 are
connected as described above, cylindrical body portion
93 of the rod is angled laterally at an angle of about 8
from a direction perpendicular to base face 62 of jig
61 to approximate the natural anatomical femoral ~algus
(note rod 91 shown in phantom in FIG. 10). Intra-
medullary rod 91 may be used in the preparation of
the distal end of either the left or right femur for the
implantation of a femoral component simply by reversing
-16-
the position of its distal end in slot 81.
An intercondylar drill guide 121 comprising a "T-bar"
handle 125 and a body portion 123 with a proximal face 124
is shown in FIGS. 26 and 27. sody portion 123 is provided
with a through bore 122 for the guidance of a drill and a
plurality of through bores, ~ ~ 126 to 129, parallel to
bore 122 for the receipt of a straight alignment pin.
Drill guide 121 also includes means on proximal face 124 for
temporarily securing the drill guide to the distal end
of a patient's femur, e.~. teeth 151 and 152. Preferably,
teeth 151 and 152 are coplanar with bores 122 and 126 to
129. It is also preferred that proximal face 124 not be
flat, but instead sligh~ly rounded transversely to adap~
to the intercondylar notch. Most preferably, proximal
face 124 has a constant radius of curvature from one end
to the other as viewed in transverse cross-sections
through body portion 123 taken perpendicular to the plane
of FIG. 27. Drill guide 121 may also be provided with a
plurality of through bores, e g. 140, to reduce its
weight.
In the preferred surgical procedure for im-
planting revision femoral component 3 and revision
tibial component 5, a number of natural anatomical
landmarks are used as references (see FIG. 17, which
is a front plan view of the left leg in one-legged
stance at extension). The mechanical axis H of the leg
is a straight line through the center of the ankle A,
the center of the knee K and the center of the femoral
head. In normal adult humans, mechanical axis H is
oriented at a 3 angle with respect to vertical axis
V. Transverse joint plane T is a horizontal plane
perpendicular to the plane of FIG. 17 drawn through the
lateral and medial femur/tibia contact areas and the
center of the knee K. Axis S is the axis of the femoral
3~i
-17-
shaft. Axes H, V and S are all in the same lateral-medial
plane. It is necessary in each individual case to
determine the correct femoral valgus for that individual
by measuring the angle between axes H and S by X-ray and
then adding 3 degrees for the inclination of mechanical
axis H to the vertical. In most cases this will give 9
of femoral valgus. A number of basic bone cuts are
required to align and seat revision components 3 and 5.
Accurate alignment is important to insure that
horizontal surfaces 27 and Sl are parallel to the
natural anatomic transverse plane of the knee and
perpendicular to lateral-medial planes (e ~. plane of
FIG. 17). Malalignment can lead to instability,
ligamental unbalance and excessive stresses at fixation
interfaces. As used throughout this application the
terms anterior, posterior, up, down, vertical, horizontal,
etc., which connote a certain direction refer to the
positions of the femoral and tibial components at
extension unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
The incision for revision total knee arthroplasty
is carefully chosen based upon the scars that are
present. Since most prior prostheses will have used
an anterior or parapatella incision, the old scar
should be utilized and the incision extended more
proximally. It is important to mobilize completely
the quadriceps mechanism from the scarred synovium
beore proceeding. It is also important to carry
the incision far enough proximally so that the patella
can be completely dislocated, everted, and the knee
flexed to 90 degrees without putting excessive tension
on the patellar tendon at the tibial tubercle. The
primary component parts which are to be revised are
then removed starting with the femoral component. Care
must be exercised to avoid fracture of residual bone
and to remove as little remaining bone stock as
~2~ J
-18-
possible. High speed cement and metal cutting burrs are helpful.
Often, however, the component parts are loose and can be easily
removed. In the case of metal tibial trays in which the stem is
not loose, the tray around the central stem can be cut with a high-
speed diamond cutting disc. This gives access to the cement-bone
interface of the central peg with minimum tibial bone loss. Follow-
ing the removal of the components, the knee is completely debrided
to include loose cement, cement in keying holes, and the posterior
aspect of the joint.
Next, a number of instruments are assembled for aligning
the distal femoral cut (see FIGURE 18). Intramedullary rod 91,
~hich can ~e positioned relative to the revision cutting jig 61
with either a right or left valgus angle, is passed into the dove-
tail slot 81 in the jig 61. Rod 91 is centered between the two
holes 73 and 75 in the body portion 63 of jig 61. A pin holder
alignment guide of the type disclosed in Canadian Patent 1,195,201
can be beneficially employed in the practice of the present inven-
tion. The unequally-sized fixation pegs 119 and 120 of the pin
holder alignment guide 111 (carrying a straight guide pin 131 at
the proper femoral valgus setting) are inserted into holes 73 and
75 with pin holder 111 extending anteriorly of jig 61. Pegs 119
and 120 of pin holder 111 should embrace flange 95 of intra-
medullary rod 91 when pin holder 111 is fully seated so as to lock
the rod 91 in place. A transverse cutting jig 133 of the ty~e
disclosed in Canadian Patent 1,195,201 is then slid over the
anterior tongue 77 of cutting jig 61 and handle 135, which is used
to control alignment of the jig 61, is then inserted into the
3~
-
--19--
holes 83 and g5 and the depression 86 in the body portion
63 of the cutting jig 61 with the handle extending
distally of jiy 61. Note that the anterior direction
is towards the top of FIG. 18.
With the knee flexed at 90 degrees, a drill hole
(e.~. 5/16 in. diameter) is placed in the center of the
femoral intercondylar notch using the drill guide 121
which references off the anterior femoral cortex
(see FIG. 19). To insure proper alignment of this
drill hole, an axial alignment pin 132 is passed
through one of the parallel bores 126 to 129 in body
portion 123 and under the quadriceps mechanism paralleling
the anterior femur. The anterior-posterior position of
this drill hole i5 not critical to the angular orientation
of the distal femoral cut, but it will be important to
the anterior-posterior position of the femoral component 3.
Next, the assembly shown in exploded view in
FIG. 18 is mounted on the distal end of the femur F
by inserting intramedullary rod 91 through the
previously formed drill hole into the femoral intra-
medullary canal. Cutting jig 61 is pressed forward
until teeth 141, 142, 143 and 144 jusk contact the
distal femoral surface. Cutting jig 61 is then aligned
in an axial rotational aspect by aligning the medial
25 arm 155 and lateral arm 157 of "T-bar" handle 135 to be
parallel to the epicondyles (see FIG. 20).
The pin holder alignment guide 111 is used to
establish proper varus-valgus and flexion-extension
alignments of the cuts at the distal end of the femur
F. Correct axial alignment is achieved when the align-
ment guide pin 131 is parallel to the femoral shaft axis
in both the anterior and la~eral views (see FIGS. 21
and 22). Care must be exercised to be certain that,
while varus-valgus and flexion-extension alignments
are being achieved, axial rotational alignment is not
lost.
~Z~
-20-
With the alignment of cutting jig 61 assured in
all three aspects, cutting jig 61 is locked in place
by tapping teeth 141, 142, 143 and 144 into the distal
end of the femur F. Then, jig 133 is slid proximally
or distally on arm 80 of tongue 77 until it defines
(with its planar distal face) a suitable plane for the
revision distal planar cut ~rotation of jig 133 with
respect to arm 80 is prevented by the shape of arm 80
and the bore in jig 133 receiving it). Jig 133 should
be positioned so that only a~ much bone is resected
to correct the plane of the original distal femoral
cut as necessary (see FIG. 23). It is seldom possible
to cut into virgin bone completely, and under no
circumstances should the cut be made proximal to the
femoral attachment of the collateral ligaments. The
goal is simply to have a properly aligned and
sufficiently stable base to proceed to the next step.
With the level and plane of the distal femoral cut
determined, two ~ 1/8 inch drill pins are passed
through holes 161 and 163 in jig 133, thereby locking
jig 133 onto the distal femur. The cutting jig 61 is
then removed, leaving jig 133 locked onto the femur.
The distal femur is then recut, preferably using a
pistol-grip, end-cutting oscillating saw. It is
important that ~he surgeon pay close attention to
maintaining the saw blade flat against the distal
cutting face 165 of jig 133 in order to achieve a
precise cut. Once the cut has been completed, the
flat surface of any of the cutting jigs can be used
to check that the surface is true. The jig 133 is then
removed. The two e.g. 1/8 inch drill pins are left in
place as additional medial-lateral and rotational
references for positioning jig 61 or making the
~3~3~i
`
-21-
anterior and posterior cuts. These two pins will of
course have to be removed before making the anterior cut.
At this point it should be noted that the surgeon
will advantageously have available a plurality of
femoral components 3 of different sizes, e.g. small,
medium, large, to account for anatomical size
differentials at the distal end of the femur from
patient to patient. At certain fixed sizes, e.g.
medium and large, the surgeon will also advantageously
be provided with a plurality of femoral components 3
of diferent bearing member portion thicknesses, for
reasons to be discussed below. The surgeon will be
provided with a plurality of revision cutting jigs 61
of different sizes, each being adapted for use in the
preparation of the femur for the implantation of one
of the different sizes of revision femoral components
3. The proper size of cutting jig 61 to be used can
usually be selected by eye. In case of doubt, the
larger cutting jig should be used first since it
will then be possible to subsequently recut the distal
femur with the next smaller cutting jig if necessaryO
The revision cutting jig 61, intramedullary rod
91, pin holder alignment guide 111, guide pin 131
and "T-bari' handle 135 (but not jig 133) are reassembled
as shown in FIGS. 18 and 22 and reinserted into the
intramedullary canal. If necessary in a case of severe
bone destruction or abnormality~ a suitable tab (not
shown in the figures) adapted for referencing off the
anterior cortex may be temporarily slipped onto arm 80
to assist in the determination of the proper anterior-
posterior position of jig 61. Arms 155 and 157 of handle
135 are again aligned with the epicondyles and the teeth
on jig 61 are then tapped into the bone until the
proximal face 62 of jig 61 is flush against the
freshly recut distal femur. The proper position
of guide pin 131 in both anterior and lateral views
`J
-22-
should be verified and the pin holder 111, guide pin 131 and
handle 135 then removed. At this point the anterior and posterior
regions of the distal femur are cut, using anterior side and
posterior side cuttiny faces 65 and 66 of cutting jig 61 as guides
(see FI~URE 24). These two bone cuts are then checked for flat-
ness.
The preparation of the proximal end of the patient's
tibia for trial reduction and implantation of a tibial component 5
is a relatively simple matter, involving only a single horizontal
transverse cut across the entire bone. The method and instrumen-
tation described in Canadian Patent 1,195,201 are preferably
employed in preparing the tibia for initial trial reduction wlth
only one significant change. The revision cutting jig 61 is left
in place on the distal femur until the transverse tibial cutting
jig 133 has been locked into place on the tibia and the pin holder
alignment guide 111, guide pins and femoral spacer/tensor jig have
been removed. In use, the femoral spacer/tensor jig fits into
holes 83 and 85 in the body portion of jig 61 rather than into a
pair of holes in the prepared femur.
2~ For use in implantation, the surgeon is preferably pro-
vided with revision femoral components and revision tibial compon-
ents having a plurality of different sizes adapted to match the
different transverse cross-sectional dimensions of the femurs and
tibias of different patients. At each size of tibial component, a
range of bearing member thicknesses (e.q. 10 mm. to 22 mm.) is
available. Additionally, at least at each of certain larger sizes,
femoral components having a plurality of different distal
- ~L2~ J
bearing portion thicknesses (e.g. 11 mm. to 15 mm. maximum thick-
ness td (see FIGURE 3)) and constant posterior bearing portion
thickness (e.g. 18 mm. maximum thickness t ) are available. In
p
all of the revision femoral components, the tibial component-
contacting lower surface of the bearing members is shaped, in the
anterior-posterior aspect, to resemble the shape of the anatomical
femoral condylar surfaces. The surgeon is also provided with a
set of trial femoral components, tibial trays, tibial bearing
inserts and patellar components, having the same dimensions as the
set of components, trays and inserts intended for ultimat~ implan-
tation, for use in trial reductions of the prosthetic joint.
Initial trial reduction is commenced with a tibial
positioning/fixation jig (described in said Canadian Patent
1,195,201) mounted in place on the tibia. If this jig is not
stable, the appropriately-sized hole to receive fixation peg 53 is
cut in the proximal tibia, e.g. with an osteotome, and a trial
tibial tray utilized instead. In general, trial reduction is
carried out in substantially the same manner as described in said
application Serial No. 421,712. However, in the present ~revision)
case, adjustments can be made in the thickness of both the tibial
and emoral bearing members. Such adjustments are continued until
satisfactory ligamental balance is obtained in both extension and
in high flexion. Of course, one important advantage of the
practice of the present invention is that it allows for stable
trial reduction to take place through variation in the thickness of
the femoral component bearing members as well as in the thickness
of the tibial component bearing members.
`^ 12~ 6
-24-
During the initial trial reduction, a variety
of instability problems may be encountered. These
require choices among the components available to
achieve optimal balance of the soft tissue envelope
of the knee. There are basically three possibilities
for flexion and for extension stability: too loose, too
tight or "just right". This gives nine possible
combinations of which only "just right" for stability
in extension and "just right" for stability in flexion
is acceptable. Adjustments for alleviating the problems
associated with the eight other potential conditions
are outlined below for the situation in which a femoral
component size is being used for which the surgeon has
available a plurality of femoral components with the
lS same posterior bearing portion thickness and varying
distal bearing portion thickness:
_ ~2~ J
-25
ADJUSTMENT
FEMORAL TIBIAL
CONDITION SIDE SIDE RATIONALE
(1)
5 ExtensionNothing Thicker Thicker tibial
Too Loose Plateau plateau will
increase stability
Flexlon in both flexion
Too Loose
and extenslon.
(2) _
10 Extension Thicker Thinner Thicker femoral
Too Loose femoral plateau component increases
Flexion component stability in
Too Tight extens ni al owlng
component to loosen
ligaments in flexion.
15 (3)
Extension Thicker Nothing Thicker femoral
Too Loose femoral component increases
component stability in
Flexion extension only.
20 Just Right
)
Extension Thinner Thicker Thinner femoral
Too Tight femoral plateau component reduces
Fl component tension in extension
25 Too Loose or additional permitting use of
femoral thicker plateau to
resection increase stability
in flexion.
(5)
Extension Nothing Thinner Opposite of condition
Too Tight plateau or #1. Thinner tibial
. additional plateau will decrease
35 Flexlon tibial tightness in both
Too Tight resection flexion and extension.
-- ~2~8~3~ ~
ADJUSTMENT
- FEMORAL TIBIAL
CONDITION SIDE SIDE RATIONALE
(6)
5 Extension Thinner Nothing Thinner femoral
Too Tight femoral component will
Flexion component or decrease tightness
additional in extension but not
Just Rlght femoral af~ect stability in
resection flexion.
(7)
Extension Thinner Thicker Same rationale as
Just Right femoral tibial condition #4.
15 Flex on component plateau
femoral
resection
(8)
20 Extension Thicker Thinner Same rationale as
Just Right femoral tibial condition #2.
Flexion component plateau
Too Tight
It must be recognized that the application of any
adjustment may generate another condition which must in
turn be alleviated. However, each adjustment should lead
closer to the desired final result of stability and soft
tissue balance throughout the range of motion. Prior to
component implantation, a final trial reduction using
actual femoral and tibial components and including reduction
of the patella with an actual patellar component should
be performed.
In implanting the selected revision components 3~ 5
and 150 by cementation (component 150 is the revision
patellar component see FIG. 25), the components are
sequentially implanted inserting the tibial component
first, followed by the femoral and patellar components.
Prior to the actual seating of the components, it is
preferred to control bleediny, particularly from those
3~ ~
-27-
areas to which access would be difficult with the
revision knee prosthesis in place. The lateral
geniculate artery in the posterior-lateral corner, the
vessels around the tibial attachment of the posterior
cruciate ligament, and lateral retinacular vessels,
particularly if lateral pa~apatellar release has been
performed, are the most important sources of bleeding.
When one is dealing with a hard cortical shell,
it should be multiply perforated with a small drill bit.
The remaining bone should be meticulously debrided of
all soft tissue, and any remaining cancellous ~one
cleaned with pulsatile lavage to facilitate inter-
digitalization with the cement. Since the tibia often
contains deep holes that must be completely filled with
cement, it is preferred to use low viscosity cement for
the tibial fixation. The apices of these excavations can
be connected to the outside by inserting a 16~gauge needle
into an 1/8 inch drill hole. As the cement is poured
into the tibia, a 20cc syringe attached to the needle
will aspirate air and residual blood which has a
tendency to collect at the bottom of these cavities.
After initial insertion of the tibial component
and removal of excess cement, the tibial component 5
is held in position until the cement has set. The
femoral and patellar components 3 and 150 can be cemented
simultaneously. Regular polymethylmethacrylate cement
may be used for the femur. The cement can be applied to
the bone and prosthesis simultaneously in the early dough
phase. Any posterior cavities can be finger packed, but
the cement should be applied only to the prosthesis on
the posterior planar surface 25. This prevents the cement
from running down into the postexior aspect of the joint.
Once the prosthesis is fully inserted, excess cement is
removed and the knee is fully extended, which locks the
3~
-28-
femoral component in position until the cement is
hardened. The knee is then flexed and any prominent
cement can be removed with an osteotome. The patellar
component is held to the patella with a patellar clamp
until the cement is hardened. The wound is lavaged again
and closed in a routine fashion. A dry, sterile com-
pression dressing may be applied. However, we have
found, particularly in cases with extensive dissection,
that a light compression dressing and immediate post-
operative/ continuous passive motion has been highlyeffective in maintaining good range of movement in the
revised prosthetic joint.
