Language selection

Search

Patent 1315221 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1315221
(21) Application Number: 1315221
(54) English Title: ASSAY FOR AFLATOXINS
(54) French Title: ESSAI POUR LES AFLATOXINES
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C12P 21/08 (2006.01)
  • C12N 5/18 (2006.01)
  • G01N 33/577 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CHU, FUN S.
  • ZHANG, GUANG S.
  • HEFLE, SUSAN L. (SCHUBRING)
(73) Owners :
  • FUN S. CHU
  • GUANG S. ZHANG
  • SUSAN L. (SCHUBRING) HEFLE
  • WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION
(71) Applicants :
  • FUN S. CHU
  • GUANG S. ZHANG
  • SUSAN L. (SCHUBRING) HEFLE
  • WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1993-03-30
(22) Filed Date: 1989-09-26
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
07/350,517 (United States of America) 1989-05-11

Abstracts

English Abstract


Abstract
An immunoassay for aflatoxin is disclosed. It relies on
developing antibodies which recognize both aflatoxin G1 and
B1 with substantially equal affinity. The antibodies are
preferably derived using an aflatoxin B3-HS-BSA conjugate as
an antigen.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive
property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. An assay for the presence of aflatoxin in a sample,
comprising the step of:
using an antibody capable of binding to the afla-
toxin to test for the presence of aflatoxin;
wherein the antibody is of a type that recognizes
both aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin G1, and does so with sub-
stantially equal affinities for both.
2. The assay of claim 1, wherein the antibody also
recognizes aflatoxin B3.
3. An antibody capable of binding to an aflatoxin, the
antibody recognizing both aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin G1, and
the antibody having substantially equal affinity for both.
4. A competitive assay kit comprising:
an antibody capable of binding to an aflatoxin, the
antibody recognizing both aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin G1, and
the antibody having substantially equal affinity for both;
and
a radioactively labelled aflatoxin that the anti-
body will also bind to.
5. An ELISA test kit for aflatoxin comprising:
an antibody capable of binding to an aflatoxin, the
antibody recognizing both aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin G1, and
the antibody having substantially equal affinity for both;
and
-11-

an enzyme linked aflatoxin that the antibody will
bind to.
6. A hybridoma capable of producing antibody that
binds to both aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin G1, said antibody
having substantially equal affinity for both.
7. An assay for the presence of aflatoxin in a sample,
comprising the steps of:
exposing the sample to an antibody capable of bind-
ing to the aflatoxin to test for the presence of aflatoxin;
and
determining the presence or absence of aflatoxin in
the sample;
wherein the antibody is of a type that recognizes
both aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin G1, and does so with sub-
stantially equal affinity for both;
wherein the antibody also recognizes aflatoxin B3
and is of a type that had been produced as a result of an
aflatoxin B3 conjugate with a polypeptide having been used as
an antigen where the polypeptide was linked to an aflatoxin
B3 moiety at the carbon that normally bears the OH group in
aflatoxin B3.
8. The assay of claim 7, wherein the antibody had been
derived from a cell line bearing ATCC designation HB 10106.
9. An antibody capable of binding to an aflatoxin,
wherein:
the antibody is of a type that recognizes both afla-
-12-

toxin B1 and aflatoxin G1, and does so with substantially
equal affinity for both;
wherein the antibody also recognizes aflatoxin B3
and is of a type that has been produced as a result of an
aflatoxin B3 conjugate with a polypeptide having been used as
an antigen where the polypeptide was linked to an aflatoxin
B3 moiety at the carbon that normally bears the OH group in
aflatoxin B3.
10. The antibody of claim 9, wherein the antibody had
been derived from a cell line bearing ATCC designation HB
10106.
-13-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


`- ~31522~
ASSAY FOR AFLATOXINS
This invention relates to an assay for testing for the
presence of aflatoxins. The invention use immunoassay
techniques in simultaneously testing for aflatoxin Bl and
Gl.
Background Of The Invention
Aflatoxins are a group of toxic secondary metabolites
produced by Aspergillus flavu~ and A. ~ara~iticus.
Aflatoxin ~1 (AFB1), the most toxic compound in this series,
has been found to be one of the mo~t poten~ carcinogens
occurring naturally. Another ~revalent aflatoxin, aflatoxin
Gl ("AFGl"), is also carcinoqenic. Because of frequent
contamination of ~FBl and AFGl in agricultural commodities,
aflatoxins are a potential hazard to human and animal
health. There i~, therefore, a need to accurately identify
aflatoxin contaminated food supplie~.
Investigation~ in our laboratory have led to the produc-
tion of specific antibodies against some aflatoxins (e.g.
AFBl), and several immunoassay methods for the analysis of
aflatoxin in different commoditie~ have been developed which
u~e these antibodies. See F. Chu, 47 J. Fd. Prot. 562-569
(1984); F. Chu, in Mycotoxins And Phycotoxins 277-292
(1986); F. Chu, in Modern Method~ In The Analysis And
Structural Elucidation Of Mycotoxins 207-237 (1986).
--1--
~- a

t315221
The degree of cross-reactivity of these antibodies with
various aflatoxins varies considerably. As a result, the
reliability of prior art immunoassays is adversely
affected. For example, if the antibodies used in the
immunoassay are 100% cross-reactive with AFB1, but only 33~
with AFG1 (see F.S. Chu et al., 33 Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
1125-28 (1977)) the presence of ~FG1 in the sample could
result in an inaccurately low "apparent total aflatoxin
level" by these immunoassay methods. Since current govern~
ment safety standards require total aflatoxin levels to be
below certain amounts, this could result in a false
negative. False positives could also result, depending on
the aflatoxin being tested for and the content of the
sample, thereby leading to a waste of food.
Prior art approaches for the preparation of immunogens
for the production of antibodies against aflatoxins can
generally be classified into two groups. In the first
group, aflatoxin is conjugated to a protein carrier through
a carbonyl group at the cyclopentane ring, by making a car-
boxymethyl oxime (CMO) derivative. In the second group,
conjugation is made through the dihydrofuran portion of
molecule by using a hemiacetal-type derivative. The prior
art for the antibodies which were generated by immunization
of animals with the first group of immunogens generally
recognized the dihydrofuran portion of the molecule, wherea~
those generated by the second group of immunogens had a
specificity directed toward the cyclopentane ring. This led
to differences in affinity and antibodies that generally
cannot recognize both AFBl and AFGl.

131522t
Thus, there is a need to obtain an antibody which reacts
with AFGl with about the same affinity as with AFBl.
Summar~ Of The Invention
In one aspect, the invention provides an assay for the
presence of aflatoxin in a sample. One uses an antibody
capable of binding to an aflatoxin to test for the presence
of aflatoxin. The antibody is of a type that recognizes
both AFBl and AFGl, and does so with substantially equal
affinity for both. "Substantially equal affinity" is
intended to mean that the concentration of AFGl needed to
cause 50% inhibition ("I-50") of binding of either
tritiated-AFBl or enzyme-labelled-AFBl (or both) using the
antibody under the radioimmunoassay (RIA~ or enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) conditions specified below is
lS between 50% to 200% of the concentration of AFBl needed to
do so. Preferably, the antibody also binds AFB3 and was
derived by immunizing a rabbit (or other animal) with a
conjugate of AFB3.
In another form, the invention comprises a kit with an
antibody of the above type (e.g. anti-A~B3) together with
either a radioactively labelled aflatoxin that the antibody
will al50 bind to (for RIA) or an enzyme - labelled
aflatoxin (for enzyme immunoassay)~
In yet another form, the invention provides an antibody
of the above type. An immunogen is created by converting an
OH group of AFB3 to a hemi-succislate, and then conjugating
AFB3-HS to BSA. The conjugate is then used to immunize a
rabbit (or other animals) so as to produce polyclonal anti-

-` 1 3 1 5 22 1
bodies of interest. Monoclonal (as opposed to polyclonal)
antibodies can also be ob~ained by immunization of mice with
the AFs3-HS-sSA conjugate.
An objective of the invention therefore includes
providing an immunoassay of the above kind.
Another object is to provide an assay of the above kind
which is simple, relatively inexpensive, and easy to
perform, and which reduces the risk of false positives and
false negatives.
Another objective is to provide antibodies and kits for
conducting assays of the above kind.
Still other objectives and advantages of the present
invention will be apparent from the description which
follows.
Description Of The Drawings
~ better understanding of the present invention will be
accomplished by reference to the drawings. It should be
understood, however, that the drawings and the description
of the preferred embodiments are merely examples of the
invention. They are not intended to represent the full
scope of the invention. Rather, the claims should be looked
to in order to determine the full scope of the invention.
Fig. 1 depicts the chemical structures of aflatoxin B
and Gl; and
Fig. 2 is a schematic depiction of the chemistry
involved in the development of an antigen for the antibodies
of the present invention.

1315221
Description Of The Preferred Embodiments
Materials And Methods
toxins Bl, B2, Gl, G2 were produced by Aspergillus
parasiticus NRRL 2999, and were purified according to the
method of F. Chu, 54 J. Ass. Off. Analyt~ Chem. 1304-1406
(1971). Aflatoxin B3 was either prepared from A.
parasiticus culture according to the method of J. Heathcote
_ al., 25 Tetrahedron 1497-1500 (1969), or prepared from
AFGl according to the method of R. Cole et al., 19 Agri. &
Fd. Chem. 222-223 (1971).
An AFB3 standard was kindly supplied by the National
Peanut Laboratory, USDA. Tritiated AFBl (14 Ci/mmol) was
obtained from Moravek Biochemicals, City of Industry,
California. Bovine serum albumin (BSA, RIA grade) was pur-
chased from Siqma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Missouri). Water
soluble carbodiimide, i.e. l-ethyl-3, 3-dimethylamino-
propyl-carbodiimide (EDPC) and succinic anhydride (SA) were
obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, Wisconsin).
Complete Freund's adjuvant containing Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (H 37 Ra) and incomplete Freund's adjuvant were
obtained from Difco Laboratories (Detroit, Michigan).
Albino rabbits (female) of approximately 2 kg size were
purchased from Smith's Rabbitry (Seymour, Wisconsin). The
health status of the rabbits were analyzed by a swab test.
Rabbits demonstrated to be Pasteurella negative were
selected for immunization. All chemicals and organic
solvents were reagent grade or better.

1 31 5221
Preparation Of Antigen
The method of preparation of the immunogen is schemati-
cally summarized in Fig. 2. Aflatoxin B3 was first con-
verted to the AFB3-hemisuccinate (AFB3-HS) under conditions
partially adapted from those used for the conversion of T-2
toxin to its hemisuccinate in the presence of dimethylamino-
pyridine (DAMP), F. Chu et al., 37 Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
104-108 (1979). Conjugation of AFB3-HS to BSA (or the
enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP) which can be used in an
ELISA) was then carried out in the presence of a water
soluble coupling agent, carbodiimide (E~PC), by procedures
analoyous to those previously described for T-2 toxin in
that same article.
The molar ratio of hapten to carrier protein in the
reaction mixture was 26. After reaction and dialysis to
remove the free AFB3-HS, the molar ratio was found to be
around 10 as determined according to the method of A.
Habeeb, 14 Anal. Biochem. 328-336 (1966).
Production Of Polyclonal Antibody
Immunization schedule and methods of immunization were
essentially the same as those described for T-2 toxin in F.
Chu et al., 37 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 104-108 (1979)
using the multiple injection technique in three rabbits.
The rabbits were each injected intradermally with 500 mg of
the immunogen in 1.0 ml of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer
(pH 7.4) containing 0.85% NaCl (PBS), (emulsified with
2.0 ml of complete Freund's adjuvant~ on the back of each

1315221
rabbit (40 sites) using the multiple-injection technique, F.
Chu et al. 33 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1125-1128 (1977).
For booster injections 500 mg of antigen in 1.0 ml of
PBS and 2.0 ml incomplete Freund's adjuvant was used and the
injection was made in the thighs (4 sites). The collected
antisera were precipitated with (NH4)2SO4 to a final satura-
tion of 33.3% using a 100~ saturated (NH4)2SO4 solution.
Finally, the precipitates were reconstituted to half of the
original volume with distilled water, dialyzed against dis-
tilled water for 0.5 to one hour (membrane cut-off was
10,000 daltons), against 0.01 M PBS overnight at 6C, and
then lyophilized.
Production of Monoclonal Antibody
Monoclonal antibodies were produced by fusion of P3/NS-
1/1-AG4-1 myeloma cells with spleen cells isolated from a
Balb/c mouse that had been immunized with AF33-HS conjugated
to bovine serum albumin (AFB3-HS-BSA). Protorols for the
production and characterization of the monoclonal antibodies
were similar to the procedure our lab recently reported for
the production of monoclonal antibody for T-2 toxin. T. Fan
et al., 54 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2959-2963 (1989).
Applicant has deposited hybridoma H575G4H7, which is
capable of producing such antibody, with the American Type
Culture Collection, Rockville, Maryland, as ATCC No.
HB10106. Samples from the deposit will be made available in
accordance with U.S. patent law requirements upon issuance
of the patent and in accordance with the requirements of any
applicable foreign patent laws. No patent license is
intended by such availability.
--7--

1 3 1 5221
Radioimmunoassay ("RIA")
Protocols for RIA were partially adapted from those
described for AFBl, in which an ammonium sulfate
precipitation method was used to separate the free and bound
toxin. F. Chu et al., 37 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 104-108
(1979). 50 ul of tritiated AFBl (10,000 to 12,000 dpm) (the
hot competitive compound) was incubated with 0.15 ml of
antiserum solution of various dilutions in PBS at room
temperature for 30 minutes and then in a cold room (6C) for
at least one hour, followed by separation of the bound and
free ligand with an ammonium sulfate precipitation method as
described in the prior article. Antibody titer was defined
as the reciprocal of the antiserum volume (in milliliters)
required to give 50% binding of tritiated toxin under the
conditions described.
Protocols for determination of antibody specificity were
essentially the same as for the titer determination, except
that various non-radioactive aflatoxins at concentratior.s
between 0.1-1,000 ng/mL, were added to the reaction mixture
to set up a standard curve. Different derivatives were
first dissolved in methanol and then diluted with Ool M PBS
(pH 7.4). The final volume of the reaction mixture was
0.2 ml, and the final methanol concentration was 5%.
It will be appreciated that in testing aflatoxin levels
in natural samples, the samples can be extracted using pre-
viously published procedures (e.g. El Nakib et al., 64 J.
Ass. Off. ~nal. 1077-1082 (1981)), the e~tract then being
used in place of the knowns, with the resulting radio-
activity being compared to a standard curve.
--8--

~ 31 ~221
Radioactivity was determined in a Beckman Instrument,
Inc. (Fullerton, California) model LS-5801 liquid scintil-
lation spectrometer using 4.5 ml of Aquasol ~New England
Nuclear Corp., Boston, Massachusetts).
Enzyme-linked_Immunosorbent (ELISA) Assay
ELISA assays (e.g. direct and indirect) have been used
for analysis of some mycotoxins. See generally F. Chu,
Mycotoxins And Phycotoxins (1986); F. Chu, 47 J. Fd. Prot.
562-569 (1984), F. Chu et al., 70 J. Assoc. Off. And. 854-
857 (1981) T. Fan et al., 47 J. Fd. Prot. 263-266 (1984).
Both types are competitive assays, and both can readily be
adapted to use this antibody. A direct competitive ELISA
such as the one described for the analysis of aflatoxin B
previously established by our laboratory in F. Chu et al.,
70 J. Assoc. Off. Analy. Chem. 854857 (1987j was adapted to
evaluate cross-reactlvity where AFB3-NS-HRP was used as the
marker enz~me. An ELISA can also be de~eloped using the
monoclonal antibody instead of polyclonal antibodies, and
indirect competitive ELISA (double antibody) and other
standard ELISA techniques can be applied.
General Discussion
A part of the invention is the realization that AFB3 has
structural features common to both Bl and Gl. Another part
of the invention is the realization that a conjugation point
; 25 on B3 can be obtained. Another part of the invention is the
realization that this~point leaves regions of similarity to
_9_

1 31 5221
AFBl and AFGl available for antibody formation. Moreover,
results obtained from the present study indicate that the
antibodies produced by this method have substantially equal
affinity for both aflatoxins Bl and Gl.
The relative cross-reactivity (RCR, A~Bl AFB as 100%) of
the polyclonal antibody with AFBl, AFB2, AFGl, AFG2, and
AFB3, as determined by RIA, are found to be lO0, 7.5, 78.1,
4.6, and 47.2 respectively. The RCR of ~he polyclonal
antibody as determined by ELISA using AFB3-HS-HRP AFB, as
the marker, are found to be 100, 8, 100, 8, and 80,
respectively. Note that in this latter system, the affinity
for AFBl and AFGl is indentical!
With respect to the monoclonal antibodies, competitive
radioimmunoassay using tritiated AFBl as the marker ligand
revealed that two clones produced an antibody that cross-
reacted well with both AFBl and AFGl. The relative cross-
reactivities (RCR) of antibody produced by clone 575B8F12
for AFBl, AFB2, AFGl, and AFG2 were 100, <0.1, 150 and 120
respectively. The RCR of antibody produced by clone 575G4H7
for AFBl, AFB2, AFGl, and AFG2 were 100, 50, 150 and 103,
respectively.
It should be noted that the low cross-reactivity of the
antibodies with AFB2 and AFG2 does not limit the wide use of
these antibodies because AFB2 and AFG2 rarely occur in
agricultural commodities, and because the toxicity and
carcinogenicity of these two are relatively low.
--10--

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1315221 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1996-03-30
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1995-10-01
Letter Sent 1995-03-30
Grant by Issuance 1993-03-30

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
FUN S. CHU
GUANG S. ZHANG
SUSAN L. (SCHUBRING) HEFLE
WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1993-11-10 1 15
Claims 1993-11-10 3 70
Abstract 1993-11-10 1 10
Drawings 1993-11-10 1 19
Descriptions 1993-11-10 10 337
Courtesy - Office Letter 1992-01-27 1 64
PCT Correspondence 1993-01-13 1 31
Prosecution correspondence 1993-01-08 2 41
Prosecution correspondence 1992-05-26 2 85
Examiner Requisition 1992-01-27 1 68