Language selection

Search

Patent 1319772 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1319772
(21) Application Number: 1319772
(54) English Title: ELASTOMER MODIFIED BLOW MOLDABLE POLYESTER
(54) French Title: POLYESTER MOULABLE PAR SOUFFLAGE, MODIFIE PAR UN ELASTOMERE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C8L 67/00 (2006.01)
  • C8L 9/00 (2006.01)
  • C8L 23/16 (2006.01)
  • C8L 31/04 (2006.01)
  • C8L 53/00 (2006.01)
  • C8L 53/02 (2006.01)
  • C8L 67/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SADR, CHANGIZE (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • ABC GROUP
(71) Applicants :
  • ABC GROUP (Canada)
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1993-06-29
(22) Filed Date: 1988-09-13
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
In general, blow moldable or extrusion grade polyesters
are quite expensive. A relatively inexpensive blow moldable
polyester composition can be produced by modifying a low or
injection molding grade of polyester with sufficient elastomer
to reduce the viscosity of the injection molding grade polyester
to a level at which the latter can be blow molded. For example,
a copolyester prepared by transesterification using readily
available starting materials such as dimethyl terephthalate
polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-butanediol can be mixed
with an elastomer selected from the group consisting of
ethylenepropylene diene terpolymer, ethylenepropylene diene
terpolymer in combination with high density polyethylene,
ethylene-vinyl acetate thermoplastic copolymer, and styrene-
ethylene-butylene-styrene block copolymer to yield a relative
inexpensive molding grade polyester composition.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN
EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS
FOLLOWS:
1. A blow moldable polyester composition comprising
a homogeneous mixture of an injection molding grade polyester
and sufficient elastomer to reduce the viscosity of the
injection molding grade polyester to a level at which the
latter can be blow molded.
2. A composition according to claim 1 wherein said
injection molding grade polyester is a copolyester of dimethyl
terephthalate polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-
butanediol, and said elastomer is selected from the group
consisting of ethylenepropylene diene terpolymer,
ethylenepropylene diene terpolymer in combination with high
density polyethylene, ethylene-vinyl acetate thermoplastic
copolymer, and styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene block
copolymer.
3. A blow moldable polyester composition comprising
a homogeneous mixture of from 40 to 60% by weight of an
injection molding grade copolyester of dimethyl terephthalate
polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-butanediol, from 10 to
50% by weight of ethylenepropylene diene terpolymer and from
10 to 30% by weight of ethylene-vinyl acetate thermoplastic
copolymer.
4. A composition according to claim 3, including
from 0 to 6% by weight of calcium carbonate.

5. A blow moldable polyester composition comprising
a homogeneous mixture of from 40 to 50% by weight of an
injection molding grade copolyester of dimethyl terephthalate
polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-butanediol, from 40 to
50% by weight of ethylenepropylene diene terpolymer and from 5
to 20% by weight of an ionomer based on zinc salts of
ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid copolymers.
6. A blow moldable polyester composition comprising
a homogeneous mixture of approximately 40% by weight of an
injection molding grade copolyester of dimethyl terephthalate
polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-butanediol, from 40 to
50% by weight of ethylenepropylene diene terpolymer and from
10 to 20% by weight of an ionomer based on zinc salts of
ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid copolymers.
7. A blow moldable polyester composition comprising
a homogeneous mixture of from 50 to 60% by weight of an
injection molding grade copolyester of dimethyl terephthalate
polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-butanediol, from 20 to
30% by weight of ethylene-vinyl acetate thermoplastic
copolymer, and from 10 to 30% by weight of styrene-ethylene-
butylene-styrene block copolymer of the A-B-A type, where A
represents polystyrene end blocks and B represents a
polyolefin rubber midblock.
8. A blow moldable polyester composition comprising
a homogeneous mixture of approximately 40% by weight of an
injection molding grade polyester, approximately 40% by weight
16

of ethylene-propylene diene terpolymer and approximately 20%
by weight of ethylene-vinyl acetate thermoplastic copolymer.
9. A blow moldable polyester composition comprising
a homogeneous mixture of approximately 40% by weight of an
injection molding grade copolyester of dimethyl terephthalate
polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-butanediol,
approximately 40% by weight of thermoplastic elastomer and
approximately 20% by weight of ethylene-vinyl acetate
thermoplastic copolymer.
17

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ 3 ~ s~
This invention relates to a polyester composition,
and in particular to an elastomer modified polyester composition.
In general, injection molding grades of polyesters
are not blow moldable. slow moldable or extrusion grade polyester
is expensive. Obviously, if blow moldable polyesters can be
rendered extrudable or blow moldable, a substantial cost saving
can be realized.
The object of the present invention is to meet the
above described need by providing a polyester composition including
a low or injecti.on molding grade of polyester which is modified
to be blow moldable.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a blow
moldable composition comprising a homogeneous mixture of an
injection molding gxade polyester and sufficient elastomer to
reduce the viscosity of the injection molding grade polyester
to level at which the latter can be blow molded.
The following is a list of trade marks used in the
detailed description of the invention.
Hytrel is an E.I. duPont de Nemours (hereinafter referred
to simply as duPont) trade mark for a copolyester prepared
by transesterification using readily available starting materials
such as dimethyl terephthalate polytetramethylene ether glycol
and 1,4-butanediol. The polymers are normally synthesized
by conventional equilibrium melt condensation polymerization
in the presence of an ester interchange catalyst. The resulting
products are random block copolymers consisting of crystalline
1,4-butanediol hard segments and amorphous elastomeric poly-
alkylene ether terephthalate soft segments. Hytrel provides
excelIent resistance to non-polar materials such as oils and
-- 1 --
'
'~` -

7 2
hydraulic fluids even at elevated temperatures, and is resistant
to most polar fluids such as acids, bases, amines and glycols
at room temperature. The resistance of Hytrel to hot moist
enviroments is also good. In general, Hytrel is resistant
to the same classes of chemicals and fluids as polyurethanes,
both ester and ether based. However, Hytrel has better high
temperature properties than polyurethanes. Hytrel polyester
elastomers do not contain an extractable plasticizer as do
flexible vinyls, certain grades of nylon and many rubber compounds.
Many fluids and chemi.cals will extract the plasticizer from
these materials, causing a significant increase in stiffness
and volume shrinkage. Hytrel has excellent flexibility at
room temperature and low temperatures, excellent flex crack
resistance, resistance to tear, abrasion and impact, and has
a service temperature of -50 C to 110C.
Lomod B0100 and B0200 are General Electric trade marks
for a polyester.
Admer L2100 is a Mitsui Petrochemical Industries ltd.
trade mark for a maleic anhydride modified polyolefin adhesive.
Surlyn 1705 is a duPont trade mark for an ionomer
based on zinc salts of ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid copolymers.
The zinc ions neutralize from 10 to 90% of the acid groups,
and the remaining unsaturated carboxylic acids can be either
mono or dicarboxylic acids such as acrylic, methacrylic (preferred),
ethacrylic, itaconic, maleic-fumaric acids, hydrogen maleate
-- 2 --
:
.
.

:~ 3 ~ 2
and methyl hydrogen fumarate. Surlyn provides thermal stability,
excellent abrasion and impact resistance. Most ionomers are
insoluble in common organic solvents at room temperature, and
resist a~tack from most mild acids and bases. Outstanding
low temperature flex and impact toughness are characteristic.
The brittleness temperature for the polymers is as low as -110C.
Finally, the change in modulus versus temeprature is relatively
small.
Elvax 265 is an E.I. duPont de Nemours trade mark
for an ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) thermoplastic copolymer
including from 5 - 50~ by weight vinyl acetate in an ethylene
chain. EVA copolymers are polymerized under high pressure
using reactors of the type used to make conventional low density
polyethylene to yield a highly branched, copolymer with acetoxy
groups positioned randomly along the carbon chain. The vinyl
acetate reduces the polymers crystallinity which increases
flexibility, and improves low temperature flexibility, impact
strength, weatherability, and oil and grease resistance.
Nordel 5892 is a du Pont trade mark for ethylenepropylene
diene( EPDM), which is a terpolymer elastomer produced in several
variations, the principle variant being the diene mentioned
above. Dicyclopentadiene, ethylidene norbornene and 1,4-hexadiene
are the types usually selected as the nonconjugated diene component.
The unsaturation remaining after the initial syntheses is utilized
in classical sulfur type vulcanization. Nordel hydrocarbon
'
'
'' . :
~ ' .
- .

~ 3 ~ 2
elastomers are extremely resistant to attack by ozone, oxygen
and weather. Moreover, properly prepared vulcanizates of Nordel
are outstanding in resistance to deterioration by heat, steam
and many chemicals.
Kraton G1650 is a Shell trade mark for styrene-ethylene-
butylene-styrene block copolymer of the A-s-A type, where A
represents polystyrene end blocks and s represents a polyolefin
rubber midblock. Since Kraton G rubbers have a unique olefin
rubber midblock, they are heat and shear stable at processing
temperatures as high as 500F. Finished articles formed of
Kraton G rubbers are highly resistant to ozone attack, oxidation
and degradation from exposure to sunlight. The elastomers provide
excellent resistance to water, acids and bases, and are flexible
at low temperatures.
Kraton G7610X is a Shell trade mark for an experimental
copolymer of the above-described type.
NDG 4167 is a duPont trade mark for a preblended com-
bination of Nordel (EPDM) and high density polyethylene having
outstanding low temperature toughness and high stiffness.
GEOLAST 703-40 is a Monsanto trade mark for a thermo-
plastic elastomer with superior oil resistance and excellent
heat aging.
Several compositions were produced in an effort to
convert high viscosity injection molding grade material to
a lower viscosity material for use in a wide range oE applications
-- 4
: ~
:

7 7 ?J
such as blow molding, extrusion and perhaps injection blow molding.
It has been found that the introduction of an elastomer into
the polyester lowers the melt flow of the material and subsequently
the viscosity. Several of the compositions were tested for
blow moldability by producing parts using conventional blow
molding techniques.
In general terms, the blow molding technique involves
the extrusion of a tubular parison into a mold, closing of the
mold, and blowing of air into the parison to conform the shape
thereof to that of the mold. The temperatures used are dependent
upon the combinations of materials in the parison, and a consideration
of the melt temperatures at lowest possible processing temperature
of the combinations. Some of the compositions were coextruded
into three layer articles by coextruding three thermoplastic
masses through a common extrusion nozzle, each mass being in
the form of a layer, whereby a three layer body is formed. The
three thermoplastic resins are fed from three separate hoppers,
the thickness of each layer varying in accordance with the rate
of revolution and dimensions of the three individual screws
leading from the hoppers. The thickness of each layer can range
from 2 - 98% of the total thickness of the coextrusion. All
of the compositions tested for extrusion and blow molding proved
to be quite successful.
Table 1 below provides three examples of compositions,
which were blow molded using the above described technique at
a melt temperature of 220C.
- 5 -
.:
, .
- . : . .
;

772
TABLE 1
INGREDIENTS COMPOSITION
EX.l EX.2 EX.3
HYTREL 5556 40~ 40% 40%
NORDEL 5892 (EPDM) 40% 46%
NDG 4167 (EPDM) 40%
ELVAX 265 (EVA~ 20% 14% 20%
TEST RESULTS
Melt flow (g/lOmin) 1.64 1.03 3.98
Hardness (Shore D) 40 38 49
Specific gravity 1.010 1.003 1.100
Tensile Properties
Type: Inj. Moulded
Tensile strength (MPs) 15.7 13.5 11.0
Elongation, break (%) 480 400 475
Flexural Modulus (MPa) 46.3 43.7 67.9
In general, for a polymer to be blow moldable, the
polymer must have a melt flow in the range of 0.8 - 6g/lOmin
at the lower end of the polymers processing temperature range
(without unmelted material being extruded). Although the above
table provides a small sampling of compositions, which prove
to be blow moldable, it is readily apparent that it should
be possible to blow mold virtually any elastomer modified polyester,
2~ i.e. to convert a injection molding grade polyester to a b].ow
molding grade polyester by elastomeric modification thereof.
All of the compounds listed in Table 1 have similar
basic physical properties. With the use of elastomers, hardness
decreases so that any element produced with the compositions
has increased flexibility. Because of the low tensile flexural
modulus elongation and hardness values, the compositions could
be used for articles such as strut covers, dust shields and
.
-- 6 --

~ 3 ~ 2
air ducts where flexibility is important. The use of EVA helps
maintain the excellent physical properties exhibited by the
base resin (polyester). The use of EPDM (Nordel 5892) results
in a low blow molding melt flow range, and the use of EPDM
(NDG 4167) results in a high blow molding melt flow range.
The low blow molding melt flow range usually provides a more
stable parison for use in the production of thick parts, while
the higher melt flow materials are often used for the production
of thin walled parts.
Table 2 lists a second set of compositions (Examples
4 to 7) of compositions produced in accordance with the present
invention.
TABLE 2
INGREDIENTS COMPOSITION
EX.4 EX.5EX.6 EX.7
15 HYTREL 4774 60% 60~ 60% 60~
NORDEL 58g2 (EPDM) 15~ 10% 14% 20%
ELVAX 265 (EVA) 25% 30% 20% 20
CaCO 6%
TEST RESULTS
Melt flow (g/lOmin) 6.77 8.54 6.10 5.27
Hardness (Shore D) 40 41 42-43 41
Specific gravity 1.070 1.0721.110 1.063
Tensile Properties
Type: Inj. Moulded
Tensile strength (MPa) 16.0 13.6 13.4 13.5
Elongation,break(%) 430 388 310 363
Flexural Modulus (MPa) 50.5 51.0 57.3 50.0
.
-- 7 --
. . -
.
:.
.

~3~7~
All of the compositions listed in Table 2 have similar
basic physical properties. The hardness of the basic polyester
is reduced providing increased flexibility. The high values
for melt flow means that the compositions can be used for the
production of thin-walled elements. The use of ethylene-vinyl
acetate helps to maintain the excellent physical properties
of the base resin (polyester).
A third set of three compositions having the same
constituents as each other is listed in Table 3.
TABLE 3
INGREDIENTS COMPOSITION
EX.8 EX.9 EX.10
HYTREL 5556 48% 46% 40~
NORDEL 5892 (EPDM)47% 44% 40%
SURLYN 1705 5% 10% 20%
TEST RESULTS
Melt flow (g/lOmin)1.04 1.13 1.18
Hardness (Shore D)42-43 45 44-46
Specific gravity1.018 1.020 0.996
Tensile Properties
Type: Inj. Moulded
Tensile strength (MPa) 13.6 15.1 17.5
Elongation, break (%) 405 430 445
Flexural Modulus (MPa) 56.3 60.7 79.8
Except for the one relating to the melt flow values,
the comments with respect to Examples 4 to 7 are also applicable
to Examples 8 to 10. The low melt flow values of the composition
of Examples 8 to 10 provide a more stable parison for use in
the production of thicker parts.
.

11 3~ ~7~f;~
Table 4 provides details of two examples oE modified
polyesters which have similar physical properties, including
low melt flows, reduced hardness, and good tensile, elongation
and flexural modulus values. The dramatically reduced melt
flow results in slow extrusion of material and minimum parison
stretching, enabling the production of thick walled components.
The combination of low melt flow and low hardness means that
the compositions can be used in the production of components
which are expected to have a long life span (increased flexibility
due to decreased hardness) and durability (thicker parts because
of low melt flow). The good tensile, elongation and flexural
modulus properties make the compositions useful for the production
of constant velocity, stearing gear, suspension struts and
shock absorber boots or covers.
TABLE 4
INGREDIENTS COMPOSITION
EX.ll EX.12
HYTREL 5556 40% 40~
KRATON 1650 40% 46%
SURLYN 1705 20% 14%
TEST RES LTS
U
Melt flow (g/lOmin) 0.94 0.98
Hardness (Shore D) 49-50 43
Specific gravity 1.030 1.012
Tensile Properties
Type: Inj. Moulded
Tensile strength (MPa)22.5 21.0
Elongation, break (%) 530 550
Flexural Modulus (MPa)92.3 73.0
, ~ , , .
, '- : ~ ' ' ' ' ~ .
~: ,
- ~ .

7 ~ ~
The compositions listed in Table 5 also have similar
physical properties.
TABLE 5
INGREDIENTS COMPOSITION
EX.13 EX.14 EX.15
HYTREL 5556 50~ 50%
HYTREL 4774 60~
ELVAX 265 (EVA) 22% 30% 30%
KRATON G7610X 28~ 20~ 10%
TEST RESULTS
Melt flow (g/lOmin)17.5 7.16 16.33
Hardness (Shore D) 35 40 40
Specific gravity 1.075 1.070 1.085
Tensile Properties
Type: Inj. Moulded
Tensile strength (MPa) 11.0 11.2 14.9
Elongation,break (%) 310 380 410
Flexural Modulus (MPa) 60.9 63.7 49.4
The high melt flow, which is out of blow molding range
means that the compositions can be used for injection blow
molding. Reduced hardness leads to increased flexibility.
Tables 6 and 7 list additional compositions which
have similar basic physical properties, including melt flows
at the high end of the blow molding melt flow range enabling
the production of thin-walled elements. Because of the low
tensile and elongation (especially tensile) properties, the
compositions are best suited for the production of flexible
elements, e.g. dust covers and air ducts. For such elements,
the tensile and elongation values need not be high, and the
material must be sufficiently soft to flex under extreme temperature
conditions.
-- 10 --
,
.- , . . .
., ,~- ' . ~- ,
:
'

~ ~31~772
TABLE 6
INGREDIENTS COMPOSITION
EX.16 EX.17
LOMOD B0100 40%
LOMOD B0200 40%
NORDEL 5892 (EPDM) 40% 40%
ELVAX 265 (EVA) 20~ 20%
TEST RESULTS
Melt flow (g/lOmin) 4.28 4.05
Hardness (Shore D) 29 35
Specific gravity 0.093 1.000
Tensile Properties
Type: Inj. Moulded
Tensile strength (MPa) 6.7 10.4
Elonyation, break (%) 370 400
Flexural Modulus (MPa) 26.3 41.8
TABLE 7
INGREDI_NTS COMPOSITION
EX.18
HYTREL 5556 40~
GEOLAST 703-40 40%
ELVAX 265 (EVA) 20%
TEST RESULTS
Melt flow (g/lOmin) 0.32
20 Hardness 31
Specific gravity 0.956
Tensile Properties
Type: Inj. Moulded
Tensile strength (MPa) 9.1
Elongation, break (~) 200
Flexural Modulus (MPa) 28.7
For comparison purposes, the characteristics of the
basic polyesters and elastomers used in the above described
compositions are listed in Table 8.
~ .
-- 11 --
.: . . . .
. :: - ~ . ~ . , .
~' ' ~, ' .' ~' . :

~L3~ ~72
,~
3 e
o~o ~ o~r~ o o
O ~ o o
oo O~ ~ E~
~ ~r
0~ 0 ~ I~ O I
O . ~ I In I
O O I~D ~ I
dP t_
Z o ~ CO ~
O ~ o ~ ~r .. o .
H ~1 ~ ~r ~1 11~ O O
E-~
H ~1
o
O o ~ n ~ ,~
C) C,~ O U~ O
~ Il~ ~D
cO ~ In
~ O U~ I ~1 0
m o .u~ . .
m ,~ o o .c
O ~D
o ~r ~ ~ o~
I U~ ..o ~ ~
~1 ~ o h
æ
.,,
h
a
Q~
~ ~ _ _
~ _u~ a) .Y ` '
o ~
~I h rl~ O 1:~ R ~ O
~c ~ o ~
o o ~nt~ Q~ O ~J
U~ ~ ~D ~ O ~ ~ E~ ~ o ~ ~ ~
E~ ~ U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --~ O
Z ~ ~ 1') o co 1` 3 3 Il~
r~ u~ ~ ~ m In c~ u~o u~ ~H ~U ~) 0
H ~:1~ u~ ~ 0 h
a ~ z ~i ~
O ~ X
~; ~ ~; ~; O ~ E~ E~~ ~I t)u~ Q~ ~: O
E~ K ~: ~q ,I S~
H ~1 ~1 Z P E-~~ 0 Q~~ ~ H
- 12 -
',, ~ ~ . : ,. .
,

~ 3 ~
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that
preferred polyester compositions of the present invention
include the following:
(i) a homogeneous mixture of from 40 to 60% by
weight of an injection molding grade copolyester dimethyl
terephthalate polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-
butanediol, from 10 to 50~ by weight of ethylene propylene
diene terpolymer; and from 10 to 30% by weight of ethylene-
vinyl acetate thermoplastic copolymer;
(ii) the composition of (i) above including 0 to 6%
by weight of calcium carbonate;
(iii) a homogeneous mixture of from 40 to ~0% by
weight of an injection molding grade copolyester of dimethyl
terephthalate polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-
butanediol, from 40 to 50% by weight of ethylenepropylene
diene terpolymer and from 5 to 20% by weight of an ionomer
based on zinc salts of ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid
copolymers;
(iv) the composition of (iii) above containing
approximately 40% by weight of the copolyester, from 40 to 50%
by weight of the terpolymer and from 10 to 20% by weight of
the ionomer;
(v) a homogeneous mixture of from 50 to 60~ by
weight of an in~ection molding grade copolyester of dimethyl
terephthalate polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-
butanediol, from 20 to 30% by weight ethylene-vinyl acetate ~.
copolymer, and from 10 to 30% by weight styrene-ethylene-
13
'
:, ' . '
: . . . ~ , ' ~ ' '

~ 3~7~
butylene-styrene block copolymer of the A-B-A type, where A
represents polystyrene end blocks and B represents a
polyolefin rubber midblock;
(vi) a homogeneous mixture of approximately 40% by
weight of an injection molding grade polyester, approximately
40% by weight of ethylene-propylene diene terpolymer and
approximately 20% by weight of ethylene-vinyl acetate
thermoplastic copolymer; and
(vii) a homogeneous mixture of approximately 40% by
weight of an injection molding grade copolyester of dimethyl
terephthalate polytetramethylene ether glycol and 1,4-
butanediol; approximately 40% by weight of a thermoplastic
elastomer and approximately 20% by weight of ethylene-vinyl
acetate thermoplastic copolymer.
Obviously, the ingredients of the various compositions must be
compatible.
14
f '~;^,
:
~ . -
- . ' .

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1319772 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2020-09-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2005-06-29
Letter Sent 2004-06-29
Grant by Issuance 1993-06-29

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (category 1, 4th anniv.) - standard 1997-06-30 1997-06-19
MF (category 1, 5th anniv.) - standard 1998-06-29 1998-06-01
MF (category 1, 6th anniv.) - standard 1999-06-29 1999-05-20
MF (category 1, 7th anniv.) - standard 2000-06-29 2000-06-22
MF (category 1, 8th anniv.) - standard 2001-06-29 2001-06-26
MF (category 1, 9th anniv.) - standard 2002-07-01 2002-05-17
MF (category 1, 10th anniv.) - standard 2003-06-30 2003-06-25
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ABC GROUP
Past Owners on Record
CHANGIZE SADR
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1993-11-16 3 82
Drawings 1993-11-16 1 12
Cover Page 1993-11-16 1 17
Abstract 1993-11-16 1 25
Descriptions 1993-11-16 14 414
Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-08-23 1 172
Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-08-23 1 172
Fees 2003-06-24 1 23
Fees 1997-06-18 1 33
Fees 1998-05-31 1 26
Fees 2001-06-25 1 28
Fees 2002-05-16 1 25
Fees 1999-05-19 1 25
Fees 2000-06-21 1 28
Fees 1996-06-26 1 33
Fees 1995-05-04 1 33
PCT Correspondence 1989-02-21 1 25
PCT Correspondence 1993-04-01 1 27
Prosecution correspondence 1992-07-26 3 105
Prosecution correspondence 1990-09-03 1 20
Courtesy - Office Letter 1989-02-09 1 54
Examiner Requisition 1992-03-26 1 71
Examiner Requisition 1990-04-30 1 45