Language selection

Search

Patent 1320642 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1320642
(21) Application Number: 1320642
(54) English Title: SLAG REMOVAL SYSTEM FOR A SOLID FUELS GASIFICATION REACTOR
(54) French Title: SYSTEME D'ELIMINATION DES SCORIES POUR GAZOGENE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10J 3/72 (2006.01)
  • C10J 3/48 (2006.01)
  • C10J 3/52 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MAYES, M. DALE (United States of America)
  • WHITE, WILLIAM P. (United States of America)
  • RUIZ, FRANK A. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • DESTEC ENERGY, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • DESTEC ENERGY, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1993-07-27
(22) Filed Date: 1986-08-06
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT
The present invention provides an apparatus
and a process for removing a slag/water slurry from
a pressurized solid fuels gasification reactor. The
apparatus includes at least one pressurized crusher
connected to the discharge end of the reactor, and
a series of flow restriction elements in a conduit
connected to the discharge end of the crusher.
Water is beneficially mixed at a controlled rate
of flow with the slurry discharged from the crusher,
thereby cooling the slurry and controlling the flow
rate of the slurry stream in the conduit.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-11-
The embodiments of the invention for which
an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are
defined as follows:
1. An apparatus for the continuous, uninter-
rupted removal of a slag/water slurry from a pressur-
ized solid fuels gasification reactor, the apparatus
comprising: at least one pressurized crusher for
reducing the particle size of the slag solids, said
crusher being connected to the slag discharge end of
the reactor, and a depressurizing system which includes
a conduit through which the slag/water slurry continu-
ously flows, said conduit being connected to the
discharge end of the crusher, and at least one
restriction element to restrict the continuous kinetic
fluid flow of the slag/water slurry through the con-
duit, said restriction element being disposed within
the conduit and having an opening, the diameter of
which is less than that of the conduit, said element
causing a reduction in the pressure of the slurry at
the discharge end of the depressurizing system to a
level substantially below the pressure of the reactor.
2. The apparatus of Claim 1 wherein two
pressurized crushers are present, comprising
a primary crusher for reducing the
particle size of the slag solids being connected to
the slag discharge end of the reactor,
29,309A-F -11-

-12-
a secondary crusher for further reducing the
particle size of the slag solids, said secondary
crusher being connected to the discharge and of the
primary crusher,
a depressurizing system which includes a
conduit through which the slag/water slurry con-
tinuously flows, said conduit being connected to the
discharge end of the secondary crusher, and
a restriction element as defined in Claim 1.
3. The apparatus of Claim 1, including means
for injecting and mixing water with the slurry after
the particle size of slag solids has been reduced by
the crusher.
4. The apparatus of Claim 2, including means
for injecting and mixing water with the slurry after
the particle size of slag solids has been reduced by
the crusher.
5. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein the
means for injecting water into the slurry stream
include a valve for controlling the flow rate of the
water, thereby cooling the slag/water slurry and
providing for variable flow and pressure control
thereof through the depressurizing system.
6. The apparatus of Claim 4, wherein the
means for injecting water into the slurry stream
include a valve for controlling the flow rate of the
water, thereby cooling the slag/water slurry and
providing for variable flow and pressure control
thereof through the depressurizing system.
29,309A-F -12-

-13-
7. The apparatus of Claim 1, wherein the
restriction element has a reduced diameter orifice
which restricts the flow of the slurry.
8. The apparatus of Claim 2, wherein the
restriction element has a reduced diameter orifice
which restricts the flow of the slurry.
9. The apparatus of Claim 1, wherein the
restriction element includes a restriction plug with a
orifice, said plug being held in place by a liner
insert in the conduit.
10. The apparatus of Claim 2, wherein the
restriction element includes a restriction plug with a
orifice, said plug being held in place by a liner
insert in the conduit.
11. The apparatus of Claim 7 3 8 or 9, wherein
the orifice has a diameter of from 10 to 30 percent of
the diameter of the conduit in which the restriction
element is disposed.
12. A process for the continuous, uninter-
rupted removal of a slag/water slurry from a
pressurized solid fuels gasification reactor, which
process comprises the steps of:
(a) comminuting the slag solids in the slurry
discharged from the reactor to reduce the
particle size thereof, said slurry being
discharged from the reactor at a pressure
substantially equal to the reactor
pressure; and
29,309A-F -13-

-14-
(b) passing the slurry through a
depressurizing system which includes a
conduit through which the slurry flows
continuously and at least one restriction
element to restrict the continuous kinetic
fluid flow of the slurry and thereby
reduce the pressure of the slurry at the
discharge end of the depressurizing system
to a level substantially below the
pressure of the reactor, said restriction
element being disposed within the conduit
and having an opening the diameter of
which is less than that of the conduit.
13. The process of Claim 12, further
comprising injecting and mixing water with the slurry
after the particle size of the slag solids has been
reduced by comminution in order to cool the slurry and
provide for variable flow and pressure control thereof
through the depressurizing system.
29,309A-F -14-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~32~2
SLAG REMOVAL SYSTEM FOR A
SOLID FUELS GASIFICATION REACTOR
This invention concerns the gasification
of solid carbonaceous materials such as coke, coal,
or lignite. More particularly, thls invention con-
cerns discharging slag and/or heav~ ash from a
S solid fuels gaslfication reactor.
As presently well-known in the art, solid
fuels such as coke, coal or lignite can be ground
to a fine particulate size and mixed with oll or
water to form the feed stream for a gasification
reactor which is designed to make a useful syn-
thetic gas product. When this type of process is
carried out, a large ~uantity of molten slag that
requires disposal is formed in the reactor. Typ-
ically, the waste slag or heavy ash generaged in a
solid fuels gasification process consists of sol-
idified inorganic matter and a small amount of
unreacted car~on. Generally, this slag is dis-
charged from the bottom of the reactor an an
elevated temperature and pressure in the form of
a water slurry. The slurry being discharged may
.
29,309A-F -1-
.:

-2~
be at a temperature as high as between 150 and
350F (65 ~nd 177C) and at a pressure as high as
between lO~ and 500 pounds per s~uare inch (690
to 3450 kPa). Prior art apparatus and methods
generally include crushing the slag to reduce the
size of the slag particles, using lockhoppers to
reduce the pressure, and flashing the water from
the slag in order to further lower the temperature
and pressure of the slurry being discharged.
In general, the present invention pro-
vides an improved apparatus and process for the
continuous, uninterrupted removal of a slag/water
slurry from a pressurized solid fuels gasification
reactor, the apparatus comprising: at least one
pressurized crusher for reducing the particle size
of the slag solids, said crusher being connected
to the slag discharge end of the reactor, and a
depressurizing system which includes a conduit
through which the slag/water slurry continuously
flows, said conduit being connected to the discharge
end of the crusher, and at least one restriction
element to restrict the continuous kinetic fluid flow
of the slag/water slurry through the conduit, said
restriction element being disposed within the conduit
and having an opening, the diameter of which is less
than that of the conduit, said element causing a
reduction in the pressure of the slurry at the dis-
charge end of the depressurizing system to a level
substantially below the pressure of the reactor.
The final discharge pressure of the slurry
may be essentially atmospheric or either higher or
29,309A-F -2-

~3~6~2
--3--
lower than atmospheric if the slurry is transferred
to other apparatus. The present apparatus may also
include additional crushers and flow restriction
elements in a series configuration to further
reduce the particle size of the slag and pressure
drop from the reactor. The flow restriction
elements provide a restric-tion to the fluid flow
of the slurry in the passageway transportiny the
slurry from the reactor, thereby causing a pres
sure drop accross the element under continuous
kinetic fluid flow conditions.
The present process for discharging a
slag/water slurry from a coal gasification reactor
includes: first comminuting or crushing the slag
solids in the slurry discharged from the reactor
to reduce the particle size thereof, said slurry
being discharged from the reactor at a pressure sub-
stantially equal to the reactor pressure; and passing
the slurry through a depressurizing system which
includes a conduit through which the slurry flows
continuously and at least one restriction element
to restrict the continuous kinetic fluid flow of the
slurry and therehy reduce the pressure of the slurry
at the discharge end of the depressuring system to
a level substantially below that of the pressure of
the reactor said restriction element being disposed
wi`thin the conduit and having an opening the diameter
of which is less than that of the conduit. The process
may also include additional steps of comminuting or
crushing the solids in the slurry, and restricting
the fluid flow of the slurry, to further reduce
the size of the slag and lower the exit pressure of
the slurry from the depressurizing system. The
29,309A-F -3-

--- 132~36~2
--4--
present method further provides for injecting and
mixing water with the slurry at a controlled rate
of flow after the slag solids have been comminuted,
thereby cooling the slurry and providing for variable
flow and pressure control of the slurry through the
depressurizing system of the reactor.
The present system provides for the
continuous flow removal of slag from a pressurized
gasification reactor with a reduced risk of plug-
ging as compared to intermittent removal providedby the known lockhopper systems. These and other
aspects of the present invention will be apparent
to those skilled in the art from the more detailed
description which follows.
lS The advantages of the present invention
are even more apparent when taken in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings in which like charac-
ters of reference designate corresponding material
and parts throughout the several views thereof, in
which: ~
Figure 1 is a schematic representation
illustrating a slag removal system in a solid
fuels gasification process constructed according
to the principles of the present inventon;
Figure 2 is a cross-sectional view of a
specific restriction element of the depressurizing
system made according to the present invention;
29,309A-F -4-

-- ~32S~S~
Figure 3 is a cross-sectional veiw of
ano-ther restriction element of the depressurizing
syst~m made according to the present invention;
and
Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view of still
another restriction element of the depressuri~ing
system made according to the present invention.
The following description illustrates
the manner in which the principles of the present
invention are applied, but such description is not
to be construed as limiting the scope of the inven-
tion.
More specifically, a slag removal apparatus
10 is illustrated by Figure 1 for communuting, cooling,
and depressurizing the slag/water slurry from the
bottom of a coal-gasification reactor 1. The waste
discharge from reactor 1 comprises a solid residue
which can be characterized as either a solidified
inorganic residue or heavy ash. The slag dis-
charge is combined with water in reactor 1 to forma slurry. The reactor 1 is operated under conditions
of temperature, pressure, and concentrations generally
well-known and practiced in the art for converting
coke, lignite, or coal into gaseous fuel. The tem-
perature at the discharge end of the reactor 1 isbetween 150 and 350F (65 and 177C) and the pres-
sure is between 100 and 500 pounds per square inch
(690 and 3450 kPa). Preferably, the reactor 1 is
operated continuously; and the comminution, cooling,
and depressurization of the reactor slag/water
slurry are carried out as a con-tinuous process.
29,309A-F 5-

--" 132~
-6-
The slag/water slurry is discharged
from the reactor 1 through a first conduit 2
to a primary crusher 3. The crusher 3 is pro-
vided with a housing capable of withstanding
the full pressure at the discharge end of the
reactor 1. The conduit 2 and crusher 3 are con-
nected together by flanges 4.
The partially comminuted slag from the
primary crusher 3 is discharged to a secondary
crusher 3a, where the slag is further comminuted.
The crusher 3a is also provided with a housing
which, like the housing for the primary crusher
3, is capable of withstanding the full operating
pressure at the discharge end of the reactor 1.
Crushers 3 and 3a are connected together
by flanges 4a.
The comminuted slag is then discharged
as a slurry from the secondary crusher 3a to a
second conduit 5. The conduit 5 is connected to
the crusher 3a by flanges 4b and 4c. Flow through
the conduit 5 may be controlled by a first valve
5a. Downstream of the valve 5a, water is intro-
duced into conduit 5 from conduit 6 through valve
6a. The slag/water slurry then passes through a
series of restriction elements 7 in the conduit
5. Valves 5a and 6a regulate and control the flow
rate of the water and of the slag/water slurry.
As the stream continuously flows through conduit
5, there is a drop in pressure caused by the
resistance to flow imposed by each restriction
element 7. The slurry stream may then be discharged
29,309A-F -6-

--7--
from the last restriction element 7 at substantially
atmospheric pressure.
The addition of water through conduit 6
and the providion of the restriction elements 7
in conduit 5 beneficially elminate the necessity
for flashing the water from the slurry to reduce
the temperature and pressure of the slurry stream
after it exits from the depressurizing system.
Moreover, the use of the valve 6a to control the
flow rate of the water added to the slag stream
overcomes the need for providing a downstream
valve in conduit 5 to control the slurry flow
rate. Since the rate of mechanical wear in
such a valve would be much higher due to the
abrasive characteristics of the slurry as compared
to thQ wear caused only by water, this method of
injecting water into the slurry to provide flow
control is highly beneficial, economical, and
advantageous. The introduction of water into
conduit 5 also provides both a positive safety and
most beneficial means of pxeventing plugging of
conduit 5 with the slag.
A preferered restriction element 20
of a modified design which has been successfully
useed in conduit 5 is shown in Figure 2. As shown
in Figure 2, element 20 is similar to the reduced
diameter pipe element 7 shown in Figure 1, in that
element 20 includes a wear-resistant plate 8 through
which a reduced diameter orifice 8a is provided for
29,309A-F -7-

-8- ~32~
restricting the flow of the slag/water slurry.
The plate is held in position b~ flanges 4d in con~
duit 5. The plate 8 may also be formed as a lami-
nated structure in which the up-stream layer is a
highly abrasion-resistant material such as silicon
caxbide, tungsten carbide, alumina, or wear-
resistant metal or ceramic material. Although
not shown, an abrasion-resistant liner for conduit
5 may also be provided if the conduit is not directly
formed of an abrasion resistan-t material.
Two additional restriction elements 30
and 40 which have been successfully used in conduit
5 are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Figure 3 illustrates
a restriction element 30 which includes a frustra-
-conical support 9 which is held in place by flanges
4e in conduit 5, and which in turn holds a wear-
resistant cone-shaped liner 9a with an orifice 9b
in place to receive the slag/water slurry. Con-
duit 5 on both sides of element 30 also has a
wear-resistant liner insert 11. Figure 4 illus-
trates still another useful restriction element
40 which includes a restriction plug 12 with an
orifice 12a held in place by a wear-resistant liner
insert 13 in conduit 5. The restriction elemen-t
40 is further held in place by an obstruction, not
shown, in a down-stream flange of conduit 5. Plug
12 is beneficially molded in one piece from a hard
abrasion-resistant ceramic material such as alumina.
The restricted opening or orifices of
all the above restriction elements may be formed with
any desired cross-sectional shape. For example,
29,309A-F -8-

-9- 13~6~2
an ori~ice having a round, oval, square, -triangular
or rectangular shape may be used successfully in
conduit 5. The most beneficial shape is a round
cross-section with the orifice having a relative
diameter of ten to thirty percent of the diameter
of the conduit in which it is disposed. The siæe
of orifices of different shapes should be selected
to provide about the same relative orifice to conduit
size ratio. The materials of construction for the
slag removal apparatus 10 may be selected from known
materials that will stand up under the temperatures
and pressures previously noted, with the preferred
material being carbon steel. Also in areas where
severe mechanical wear is expected from the slag/
water slurry, the high wear-resistant materials
noted above should be used.
The primary and secondary crushers 3 and
3a are beneficially rotary crushers which include
rotor plates and breaker pIates, not shown. Such
crushers are well-known in the art~ Preferably,
the slag is comminuted in the primary crusher 3 to
a maximum dimension of about two and one-half
inches (63~5 mm), and in the secondary crusher
3a to a dimension of between one-eight of an
inch and one inch (3.2 and 25 mm).
The present combination of slag crushers,
restriction elements and means for introducting
water at or down-stream from the crushers provides
a continuous, reliable, controllable apparatus for
removal of slag from a solid fuels gasification
reactor which has a far less tendency to be plugged
by slag than other known slag removal systems.
29,309A-F -9-

~32~
While certain representative embodiments
and de-tails have been shown for the purpose of
illustrating the present invention, it will be
apparent to those ~killed in the art that various
changes and modifications can be made therein
without departing fr~m spirit and scope of the
invention.
29,309A-F -10-

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (old Act Patent) latest possible expiry date 2010-07-27
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Grant by Issuance 1993-07-27

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DESTEC ENERGY, INC.
Past Owners on Record
FRANK A. RUIZ
M. DALE MAYES
WILLIAM P. WHITE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1993-11-17 1 13
Abstract 1993-11-17 1 17
Claims 1993-11-17 4 117
Drawings 1993-11-17 2 45
Descriptions 1993-11-17 10 328
Representative drawing 2001-08-20 1 8
Fees 1995-06-08 1 82
Fees 1996-05-31 1 82
Prosecution correspondence 1988-11-14 3 68
Examiner Requisition 1988-08-24 1 57
Examiner Requisition 1991-12-09 2 73
Prosecution correspondence 1992-03-27 5 183
Examiner Requisition 1992-06-03 1 53
Prosecution correspondence 1992-08-30 1 24
PCT Correspondence 1993-05-06 1 19