Language selection

Search

Patent 1321405 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1321405
(21) Application Number: 1321405
(54) English Title: MAKING A TAPHOLE
(54) French Title: REALISATION D'UN TROU DE COULEE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C4B 35/80 (2006.01)
  • F27D 3/15 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CASSENS, NICHOLAS, JR. (United States of America)
  • RODRIGUES, ROBERT (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1993-08-17
(22) Filed Date: 1988-11-08
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
07/232,005 (United States of America) 1988-08-15

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT
A preformed taphole for a steelmaking vessel such as a
BOF furnace or a ladle is made by forming refractory material
about a steel pipe, the refractory comprising refractory
aggregate, a water soluble binder, metal fibers such as
stainless steel fibers, and graphite, preferably flake
graphite.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive
property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. Method of making a preformed taphole comprising (1)
selecting a metal pipe of the desired length and diameter, (2)
admixing (a) from 1% to 8% of a water soluble binder, (b) from
0.1% to 2% metal fibers, (c) and 0.5% to 5% graphite with (d)
basic refractory grain making up the balance of the admixture,
all percentages being by weight and based on the total weight
of the admixture, (3) adding sufficient tempering liquid to
the admixture to make a formable refractory mass, (4) forming
the tempered admixture about the outer surface of the metal
pipe, and (5) drying the so-formed refractory mass to make a
preformed taphole.
2. Method according to claim 1 wherein the basic
refractory grain is periclase.
3. Method according to claim 1 wherein the metal fibers
are steel fibers.
4. Method according to claim 3 wherein the fibers are
stainless steel.
5. Method according to claim 1 wherein the graphite is
flake graphite.
6. Method according to claim 1 wherein the water
soluble binder comprises aluminum sulfate, boric acid, and
citric acid.
7. Method according to claim 6 wherein the bond
comprises about 0.8% aluminum sulfate, about 0.7% boric acid,
and about 0.6% citric acid.
8. Method according to claim 1 wherein the basic
refractory grain is periclase, the fibers are stainless steel,
and the graphite is flake graphite.
9. Method according to claim 8 wherein the binder
comprises aluminum sulfate, boric acid, and citric acid.

10. Method according to claim 9 wherein the binder
comprises about 0.8% aluminum sulfate, about 0.7% boric acid,
and about 0.6% citric acid.
11. Refractory composition consisting essentially of (1)
from 1% to 8% of a water soluble binder, (2) from 0.1% to 2%
metal fibers, and (3) from 0.5% to 5% graphite, the balance
being (4) sized refractory grain, all percentages being by
weight based on the total weight of the composition.
12. Refractory according to claim 11 wherein the
refractory grain is a basic refractory grain.
13. Refractory according to claim 12 wherein the grain
is periclase.
14. Refractory according to claim 11 wherein the metal
fibers are steel fibers.
15. Refractory according to claim 14 wherein the fibers
are stainless steel fibers.
16. Refractory according to claim 11 wherein the
graphite is flake graphite.
17. Refractory according to claim 11 wherein the water
soluble bond comprises aluminum sulfate, boric acid, and
citric acid.
18. Refractory according to claim 17 wherein the bond
comprises about 0.8% aluminum sulfate, about 0.7% boric acid,
and about 0.6% citric acid.
19. Refractory according to claim 11 wherein the
refractory grain is basic refractory grain, the fibers are
stainless steel fibers, and the graphite is flake graphite.
20. Refractory according to claim 19 wherein the bond
comprises aluminum sulfate, boric acid, and citric acid.
21. A preformed taphole comprising (1) a hollow metal
pipe and (2) a refractory mass formed about the exterior
circumference of said pipe over at least a portion of its

length, said refractory mass consisting essentially of (a)
from 1% to 8% of a water soluble binder, (b) from 0.1% to 2%
metal fibers, (c) and 0.5% to 5% graphite with (d) basic
refractory grain making up the balance of the admixture, all
percentages being by weight and based on the total weight of
the admixture.
22. Taphole according to claim 21 wherein the basic
refractory grain is periclase.
23. Taphole according to claim 21 wherein the metal
fibers are steel fibers.
24. Taphole according to claim 23 wherein the fibers are
stainless steel.
25. Taphole according to claim 21 wherein the graphite
is flake graphite.
26. Taphole according to claim 21 wherein the water
soluble binder comprises aluminum sulfate, boric acid, and
citric acid
27. Taphole according to claim 26 wherein the bond
comprises about 0.8% aluminum sulfate, about 0.7% boric acid,
and about 0.6% citric acid.
28. Taphole according to claim 21 wherein the basic
refractory grain is periclase, the fibers are stainless steel,
and the graphite is flake graphite.
29. Taphole according to claim 28 wherein the binder
comprises aluminum sulfate, boric acid, and citric acid.
30. Taphole according to claim 29 wherein the binder
comprises about 0.8% aluminum sulfate, about 0.7% boric acid,
and about 0.6% citric acid.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~32~
File
8803
TITLE~ Making a ~aphole
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention concerns a method of making a preformed
taphole and a refractory composition for use therein.
Tapholes are openings, usually round, in the wall of a
melting furnace such as a BOF furnace or other metal melting
furnace through which molten metal and/or slag can be poured
when the furnace i~ tilted or when a plug or other closing
device in the ~aphole is removed. Tapholes are generally made
o~ refractory material which is compatlble with the refractory
material used in lining the furnace or other molten metal
container.
As the steel or other molten metal pours through the
taphole, it causes wear on the re~ractory making up the
taphole. ~enerally, the refractory making up the taphole
wears much faster than the refractory making up the furnace
lining and therefore the taphole has to be replaced on a
20 regular basis during the life of the lining.
While it is possible ko repair the taphole in place, for
example by gunning refractory around a form placed in the old
taphole (which has become enlarged by wear), such repair is
les~ than totally satisfactory. Since such repairs have to be
made on a hot furnace (it not being economical to cool the
furnace down to make the repair), the refractory forming the
repaired taphole is of lesser strength and density, due to the
increased amount oP water required to gun refractory material,
and hence will last for an even shorter time, than a taphole
30 formed by meth~ds such as casting or pressing, methods which
result in greater density and strength but which cannot be
used to repair a hot furnace.
.~

~ 3 ~ U3
Accordingly, it has become the practice to preform
refractory tapholes and then place them in tha furnace to be
repaired, the preformed taphole being held in place by, for
example, refractory material gunned around it.
Generally, such preformed tapholes are made by forming
suitable refractory material, for example by casting, about a
hollow metal pipe used as a form. In the first few seconds
that molten metal flows through the taphole so formed, it
washes away the metal and thereafter the refractory channels
the metal flow.
This invention is concerned with a method of making an
improved preformed taphole and particularly with a refractory
composition useful in making such an improved taphole.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to this invention, an improved preformed
taphole can be made by the method comprising (1) selecting a
metal pipe of the desired length and diameter, (2) admixing
(a~ from 1% to 8% of a water soluble binder, (b) from O.l~ to
2% of metal fibers, (c) and 0 5~ to 5% of graphite with (d)
20 refractory grain making up the balance of the admixture, all
percentages being by weight and based on the total weight of
the admixture, ~3) adding sufficient tempering liquid to the
admixture to make a formable refractory mass, (4) forming the
tempered admixture about khe outer sur~ace of the metal pipe,
and (5) drying the so-formed refractory mass to mak~ a
preformed taphole.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The drawing is a perspective view of a preformecl taphole
which can be made by the method o~ this invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The pipe used as a ~orm about which to mold the
refractory can be of any metal, for exampl~ aluminum, but

u ~
generally will be of iron or steel. Commonly steel pipe is
used. The diameter o the pipe will be chosPn to conform to
the size of taphole desired by the customer ~e.g., a
steelmaker) and the length also will be chosen to fit the
particular furnace in which the taphole is to be used.
Generally, the steel pipe will be longer than the refractory
wall thickness of the furnace. The wall thickness of the
steel pipe is not critical, for example it can be from 1/8
inch to 1/4 inch; generally the steel pipe will be the
thinnest which can be used in the forming process and which
can be shipped and handled without deforming.
The aggregate used ln the refractory surrounding the pipe
should be compatible with the refractory making up the lining
into which the taphole is to be place. Generally, this will
be a basic lining such as periclase or periclase/chrome. A
particularly preferred aggregate is high purity periclase,
i.e., one containing 95% or more MgO. The aggregate will be
sized, as is well known in the industry~ to provide maximum
packed density.
The water soluble bond can be any such material or
combination of materials compatible with the aggregate and
able to provide a strong bond in the composition. Such bonds
are well known in the refractory art; a particularly preferred
one is shown in the example below.
The metal fibers may be any such; preferably they will
have a length of from 1 to 3 cm and a diameter of 0.2 to 0.6
mm. Usually the fibers will be steel and most preferably
stainless steel. A variety o~ such metal fibers are
commercially available.
The graphite used may be any of various commercially
available graphites but a preferred graphite is the type
known, from its morphology, as flake graphite~ It will

~ 3 ;~
pre~erably be of a size so that at least 90% of it is larger
than 0.05 mm.
In ~orming the taphole, the requisite amounts of
re~ractory aggregate, bond, fibers, and graphite will be
admixed in a suitable mixer, for example a Hobart epicyclic
mixer, as is well known in this art. A tempering liquid,
usually water but other liquids such as alcohol might be used
in particular cases, is then added to the admixture. The
amount of tempering liquid will depend on the ~orming method
to be used. A pxeferred forming method is casting and this
will generally require from about 3 ~ to about 8 ~ water,
based on the weight of dr~ ingredients. For pres~ing, on the
other hand, a much smaller amounk, perhaps about 2% water,
will be used.
The tempered refractory admixture is then placed about
the metal pipe. As mentioned, placement by casting the
re~ractory about the metal pipe as the inner form, and using a
removable sleeve, for example a split steel pipe, as the outer
form, is a preferred forming m~thod~ The thickness of the
20 refractory may be, ~or example, from 3/4 inch (2 cm) to 2
inches (5.1 cm)O
The refractory will be placed completely about the
circum~erence of the metal pipe, but will generally not extend
to both ends of the pipe. In some cases, it may be terminated
short of each end of the pipe, as shown in the drawing,
wherein the preformed taphole is indicated generally by the
numeral 11, the metal pipe by 12, and the re~ractory by 13.
The reason for the pipe to extend beyond the refractory is to
provide means to handle the pre~ormed taphole without damaging
30 the re~ractory and also to prevent damage due to inadvertent
hitting o~ the taphole against the furnace or other structure.

~ t3 h .~
The formed taphole will then be dried or otherwise cured
(depending on the type of bond used) before being shipped to
the customer, who will install it i~ his ~urnace or other
device.
EXAMPLE
A taphole was made according to this invention by
admixing 97.9 parts by weight sized periclase grain with 0.8
part aluminum sulfate, 0.7 part boric acidl 0.6 part citric
aoid, 0.5 part F-310 stainless steel fibers 3/4 inch (19 mm)
10 long, and 1.0 part natural flake graphite.
The periclase had the following typical chemical
analysis: 0.8 % CaO, 0.3 % sio2, 0.2 % Fe2O3, 0.05 % A12O3,
less than 0.02 % B2O3, and ~by difference) 98.6 % MgO, and was
sized so that all passed a 3 mesh screen (i.e., was finer than
6.7 mm) and 22 % passed a 100 mesh screen (i.e., was finer
than 0.15 mm).
The aluminum sulfate~ boric acid, and citric acid were
the commercially available materials described in detail in US
Patent 3,~79,208.
The dry ingredients were mixed in an epicyclic Hobart
mixer for 1 minute and then 5 % water (based on the weight of
dry ingredients) added and the mixing continued ~or a further
4 minutes.
The admixture was then cast about a 6 inch (15 cm)
diameter steel pipe 5 ~eet (1.5 m~ long and having a wall
thickness of 3/16 inch (5 mm). A steel form of 7.5 inches tl9
cm) inner diameter was placed concentrically about the metal
pipe and the refractory admixture cast between the two using
vibratisn to obtain maximum density.
The taphole thus formed was stripped of the outer form
after setting at ambient tempsrature over night and then was
heated on a preset schedule to a temperature of 600 F (315

1 ~2 ~ `3
C) over a period of 30 hours be~ore being shipped to the
customer.
Pre~vrmed tapholes made according to this invention were
installed in BOF furnaces in a steelmaking plant. In the
newest furnace, the tapholes made according to this invenkion
had an average life o~ 48.6 heats, and in the oldest furnace
an average life o~ 32.3 heats. This compares ko an average
life for prior art preformed tapholes not containing the
combination of graphite and metal fibers of 33 heats in the
newest ~urnace and 22.5 heats in the oldest ~urnace.
While the reasons ~or the superior per~ormance o~
tapholes made with the combination of metal ~ibers and
graphite is not fully understood, and it is not desired to be
bound to any particular theory, it is believed that the
graphite prevents slag penetration into the refractory,
allowing the metal fibers to perform their strengthening and
reinforcing function for a longer time.
In the specification and claims, percentages and parts
are by weight unless otherwise indicated. Mesh sizes referred
20 to herein are Tyler standard screen sized which are defined in
Chemical Engineers' Handbook, John S. Perry, Editor-in-Chief,
Third Editlon, 1950, published by McGraw Hill Book Company, at
page 963. Analyses of mineral components are reported in the
usual manner, expressed as simple oxides, e.g. MgO and SiO
although the components may actually be present in various
combinations, e.g. as a maynesium silicate.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1996-08-17
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1996-02-19
Letter Sent 1995-08-17
Grant by Issuance 1993-08-17

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
None
Past Owners on Record
NICHOLAS, JR. CASSENS
ROBERT RODRIGUES
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1994-03-03 3 118
Abstract 1994-03-03 1 11
Cover Page 1994-03-03 1 19
Drawings 1994-03-03 1 19
Descriptions 1994-03-03 6 262
Representative drawing 2001-03-11 1 12
Prosecution correspondence 1991-03-18 1 27
Examiner Requisition 1990-11-20 1 34
PCT Correspondence 1993-05-24 1 22