Language selection

Search

Patent 1334834 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1334834
(21) Application Number: 1334834
(54) English Title: CONTAINER CORNER
(54) French Title: CORNIERE POUR CONTENEUR
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B65D 19/00 (2006.01)
  • B60P 7/13 (2006.01)
  • B65D 90/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • VIZI, ANDRAS (Hungary)
  • SZELES, PAL (Hungary)
  • SZENTNER, FERENC (Hungary)
(73) Owners :
  • GYORGY VIZI
  • ANDRAS VIZI
(71) Applicants :
  • GYORGY VIZI (Hungary)
  • ANDRAS VIZI (Hungary)
(74) Agent: G. RONALD BELL & ASSOCIATES
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1995-03-21
(22) Filed Date: 1989-06-22
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
3169/88 (Hungary) 1988-06-22

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to a corner element for
containers, made of manganese steel, fitted with
joining holes on its three outer sides. It is made of a
steel-plate having a Mn : C ratio of 8 to 12, a (P+S)
content of max. 0.04 percent by mass and a C-content of
max. 0.2 percent by mass. The corner element is
assembled from shell elements shaped by cold-working of
the steel-plate and from distance inserts by welding.
The size and tolerance values of the corner
element meet even the strictest specifications. Its mass
is at least 10 percent smaller than that of its steel-
-cast counterpart. It needs hardly any remachining and
its replacement inside the container can be simply and
quickly performed.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Corner element for a container, made of
manganese steel, with joining holes on its three outer
sides, characterized by being made of a steel-plate having
a Mn:C ratio of 8 to 12, a total phosphorus plus sulphur
(P+S) content of a maximum of 0.04 percent by mass and a
carbon content of a maximum of 0.2 percent by mass.
2. Corner element as claimed in claim 1, wherein
the element is assembled by welding from shell elements
produced by cold-working of the steel-plate.
3. Corner element as claimed in claim 2, wherein
the shell elements are made by bending or pressing or by
bending and pressing.
11

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


1 334834
- The present invention relates to a manganese
steel corner element with joining holes on its three outer
sides.
Different types of containers which are
categorized by the ISO standards according to size (10 to
40 feet length) and load capacity (10, 20, 24 and 30 Mp)
are used for transporting piece goods, bulk goods, liquids,
etc.
The corner elements are placed at the 8 corners
of containers, facilitating their being elevated or joined
together or joined to the transporting vehicle either
horizontally or vertically. The corner elements are
connected by vertical and horizontal holders made of rolled
plates or profile forms. In addition to their movability,
elevating and fastening, it is important that containers
can be stacked on each other.
According to the traditional technical methods
applied so far, corner elements have been steel-cast by
container manufacturers, and the finished castings are
usually welded manually or on a low mechanization level to
the vertical and horizontal holders. Checking the welds is
awkward and not entirely safe. Among the possible failures
of containers, beside the breakage of corner elements, seam
rips or breaks have been quite common owing to defective
welding. When it comes to repairs (e.g. a broken corner
element needing to be replaced) the maintenance of the
original sizes and clearances is difficult and requires
much time and energy. Besides, users are forced to
withdraw the defective containers from operation for a long
time.
In the October, 1985 issue of the scientific
review Cargo Systems P. Hewitt reports on tests concerning
cast corners, carried out by Sea Containers in cooperation
with the research laboratory Iron and Steel Co. and the
Trade Association Sheffield company. The examinations
included different measurements and tests on cast corners
- 1- .~

1 3348~
- made in different countries all over the world. The
results as regards Charpy's impact energy at low
temperature are set out in the following table.
Impact energy Temperature
(average of 3
Manufacturer measurements) C
A 4.0 J -40
B 7.5 J -40
C 14.5 J -40
D 10.5 J -40
A suitable material for manufacturing corner
elements must meet the specification of IS0 1496/1 and/or
LR 1984, where the required values at -40C, at a "V" slot
and with Charpy's method are the following:
on a 10 x 10 mm test bar min. 34 J
10 x 7.5 mm test bar min. 28 J
10 x 5 mm test bar min. 23 J
The table shows that these requirements are met
by none of the manufacturers listed. This led to the
perception that one of the defects of cast corners
manufactured with the present state of technical knowledge
is the unsatisfactory value of impact energy at low
temperatures.
A British company called Blair has recently
developed a corner element that after a single normalizing
heat-treatment and at -50C provides an impact energy value
of KVmjn= 21 J. However, it is not at low temperatures that
most breakages of corner element occur. In fact, according
to data supplied by large railway companies (such as the
West German DB, the French SNCF or the British BR) damage
to corner elements or seam rips of their holders takes
place in the positive temperature range owing to rough

-
- 3 ~ 1 33~ 8~ ~
elements must meet the specification of IS0 1496/1
and/or LR 1984, where the required values at -40 C, at
a "V" slot and with Charpy's method are the following:
on a 10 x 10 mm test bar min. 34 J
10 x 7.5 mm test bar min. 28 J
10 x 5 mm test bar min. 23 J
The table shows that these requirements are met by
neither of the manufacturers listed. This led to the
perception that one of the defects of cast corners
manufactured at the present state of technical knowledge
is the unsatisfactory value of impact energy at low
temperatures.
A British company called Blair has recently
developed a corner element that after a single normaliz-
ing heat-treatment and at -50 C amounts to the impact
energy value of KVmin= 21 J. However, it is not at low
temperatures that most breakages of corner element occur.
In fact, according to data supplied by big railway
companies (such as the West German DB, the French SNCF
or the British BR) the damage of corner elements or the
seam rips of their holders take place in the positive
temperature range owing to rough handling and reloading
as well as in the course of shunting and marshalling of
railway wagons.
Owing to the material composition of steel
castings and the additional dynamic stress due to rough
handling, their mechanical qualities get poorer in the
negative temperature range. All these result in cracks

1 334834
due to the casting technology corner elements
weigh too much;
the 8 corner elements required for each container
can be manufactured only in four patterns, shaped and cast
separately.
It follows from the foregoing that to manufacture
the corner elements in accordance with the specifications
is not easy.
It is an object of the invention to eliminate the
disadvantages of the known method and to provide a new type
of corner element that
is suitable for serial production regarding
material, structure and technology,
is economical of energy and does not require
repeated heat treatment,
is suitable for being stacked, and
has an impact energy at low temperature in
accordance with the specifications.
Accordingly, the invention provides a corner
element for a container, made of manganese steel, with
joining holes on its three outer sides, characterized by
being made of a steel-plate having a Mn:C ratio of 8 to 12,
a total phosphorus plus sulphur (P+S) content of a maximum
of 0.04 percent by mass and a carbon content of a maximum
of 0.2 percent by mass.
The material of steel-plates of this composition
is homogeneous, it has pliable edges (Rmjn= a/2 mm, wherein
"a" stands for the plate thickness) and its impact energy
value (KVmin) at -40C amounts to 21 J. The wall thickness
of the corner elements made of such material will be
smaller than that of a casting, thus it is advisable to
arrange distance inserts on the inner sides of the joining
holes, thereby ensuring proper connection with fastening
elements.
The steel-plate that serves as the basic material
of the corner element according to the invention is of
-- 4

1 334834
- homogeneous granular structure even in a direction
perpendicular to the direction of rolling, and is suitable
for applying cold-working technology. Its elongation value
(~) is over 22 percent and its edges are quite pliable.
The sizes and degrees of tolerance of the corner
elements made of such a material meet even the strictest
specifications (e.g. ISO 1161). The mass of these corner
elements is at least 10 percent less than that of their
steel-cast counterparts and its dispersion is 2 percent
less than the rated value. They require hardly any
remachining and can be replaced within the container simply
and quickly. The individual stages of their manufacture
can be mechanized to a high degree, so robotization is also
applicable, enabling high precision and reproducibility of
production.
The production of the corner element can be based
on the cold-working technology which is simpler and of low
energy consumption. The plates cut (pressed) are bent and
assembled as cold. The welding of the elements can be
carried out by robots horizontally, by simple geometrical
tracing. The root of weld is fixed and welding is
reproducible with high precision. The finished product
does not require any further heat-treatment and the
technology of its replacement is much simpler.
Two embodiments of assembly of the corner element
according to the invention are shown in Figures 1 to 7. In
the second embodiment the six sides of the corner element
are formed from two trilateral shell elements the sides of
which are joined along three edges and together form one
common peak, while the sides of the shell elements of the
first embodiment are joined along two edges, and the shell
elements are generally U-shaped.
In the drawings:
Figure 1 shows the top and side views of
embodiment 2 of the corner element and its section along
line D-E;
-- 5

1 334834
Figure 2 represents a blank of the shell element
"A" of embodiment 2;
Figure 3 shows a blank of the shell element "B"
of embodiment 2;
5Figure 4 shows shell elements "A" and "B" of
embodiment 2 together with their distance inserts;
Figure 5 shows the distance inserts C1 and C2 of
embodiment 2 and a blank from which inserts C3 may be cut;
Figure 6 represents the corner element assembled
from shell elements "A" and "B" and the distance inserts of
version l; and
Figure 7 shows the exploded view of version 2 of
the corner element according to the invention, wherein "A"
and "B" are the two shell elements, C1, C2 and C4 are the
distance inserts and the lines h-h represent the bending
edges.
The corner elements arranged in the upper and
lower planes of the container differ only in respect of the
sizes of the holes on their shorter sides; therefore, the
shell elements "A" are manufactured with two different
holes. The shell elements "B" are identical in the upper
and lower rows and are shaped in such a way that they form
the corner element together with their counterparts "A".
The shell element "A" with a slight modification
can be considered a finished product as it can serve as the
corner element of tank containers.
The size and tolerance values of the corner
element represented in Figures 1 to 7 meet the 1984
specifications of IS0 1161, and are as follows:
30length 1 = 178 + 1 mm
width w = 162 + 1 mm
height h = 118 + 1 mm
mass 9.60 - 9.75 kg + 2 %
The corner elements are interchangeable, besides
they can be manufactured in a range of dimensions for
repair purposes.

1 33~3~
According to embodiment 1 the corner element
consists of a shell element "A" made of a 10 mm thick plate
bent to form a "U" profile with an inner bending radius of
Rmin= a/2 mm, and of a shell element "B" made of a 8 mm thick
plate to form an "L" profile with an inner, bending radius
of Rmin= a/2 mm. The suitable holes are on the shell element
"A", while on the shell element "B" there are no holes at
all. The distance inserts C1, C2 and C4 of the shell
elements "A" of corners in the lower row are seated at the
inner side of the holes, their position is defined by an
orienting gauge. On the shell elements "A" of corners in
the upper row there are distance inserts marked C2, C3 and
C4 .
By defining the hole size on the shell element
"A" it can be determined whether the corner element should
be placed on the upper or lower part of the container. The
mirror image of a shell element can be produced either by
bending the blank from which an element is made in the
opposite direction or by inverting the blank.
The spare parts listed above are assembled in the
orienting gauge and, having checked the size, are fixed by
tack welds. The next operation is the continuous welding
of single-fillet welds.
The last phase is the working of the inlet slopes
(6 x 45) at the outer side of the holes.
When the corner elements are finished, their
surface cleaning takes place.
Embodiment 2 is also based on the conception that
corner elements should be constructed by two shell elements
and three distance inserts. Shell element "A" has a hole
on each side. They are cut out of a flat sheet before
bending. Shell element "B" has no holes. The two shell
elements are assembled to construct the corner element in
the same way as described for embodiment 1 (see Figure 7).

- 8 -1334834
corner element according to the invention,
wherein A and B are the two shell elements,
Cl, C2 and C4 are the distance inserts and
the lines h-h represent the bending edges.
The corner elements arranged in the upper and
lower planes of the container differ only in respect of
the sizes of the holes on their shorter sides; therefore,
the shell elements "A" are manufactured with two
different holes. The shell elements "B" are identical in
the upper and lower rows and are shaped in such a way
that they form the corner element together with their
counterparts "A".
The shell element "A" with a slight modification
can be considered a finished product as it can serve as
the corner element of tank containers.
The size and tolerance values of the corner
element represented in Figs. 1 to 6 meet the 1984
specifications of IS0 1161. Thus its
- length is 1 = 178 + 1 mm
- width is w = 162 - 1 mm
- height is h = 118 + 1 mm
- mass is 9.60 - 9.75 kg + 2 %
(according to version.)
The corner elements are interchangeable, besides
they can be manufactured in gradual dimensions for
repair purposes.
According to version 1 the corner element
consists of a shell element "A" made of a 10 mm thick

- 9 1 334834
plate bent to form a "U" profile with an inner bending
radius of Rmin= a/2 mm, and of a shell element "B" made
of a 8 mm thick plate to form an "L" profile with an
inner, bending radius of Rmin= a/2 mm. The suitable holes
are on the shell element A, whlle on the shell element "B"
there are no holes at all.
The distance inserts Cl, C2 and C4 of the shell
elements A of corners in the lower row are seated at the
inner side of the holes, their position is defined by an
orienting gauge. On the shell elements A of corners in
the upper row there are distance inserts marked C2, C3
and C4.
By defining the hole size on the shell element A
it is determined that the corner element should be placed
on the upper or lower part of the container. The mirror
image of the shell element can be produced either by
changing the bending direction to the opposite or by the
inversion of the plate.
The spare parts listed above are assembled in the
orienting gauge and, having checked the size, are fixed
by tack welds. The next operation is the continuous
welding of single-fillet welds.
The last phase is the working of the inlet slopes
(6 x 45) at the outer side of the holes.
When the corner elements are finished, their
surface cleaning takes place.
Version 2 is also based on the conception that
corner elements should be constructed by two shell

- 1 334834
- 10 -
elements and three distance inserts. Shell element "A"
has a hole on each side. They are cut out of the out-
spread plate before bending. Shell element "B" has no
holes. The two shell elements a.e assembled to construct
the corner element in the same way as described for
version 1.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2001-10-18
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1999-03-22
Letter Sent 1998-03-23
Grant by Issuance 1995-03-21

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GYORGY VIZI
ANDRAS VIZI
Past Owners on Record
FERENC SZENTNER
PAL SZELES
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1995-03-30 1 19
Drawings 1995-03-30 7 126
Claims 1995-03-30 1 19
Abstract 1995-03-30 1 19
Representative Drawing 2003-03-20 1 10
Descriptions 1995-03-30 10 354
Maintenance Fee Notice 1998-04-19 1 177
Courtesy - Office Letter 1991-06-03 1 54
PCT Correspondence 1994-12-22 1 32
Prosecution correspondence 1994-04-27 6 204
Prosecution correspondence 1993-12-14 1 31
Examiner Requisition 1993-10-03 2 70
Prosecution correspondence 1992-09-07 1 38
Examiner Requisition 1992-05-14 1 54
Fees 1997-03-04 1 48