Language selection

Search

Patent 1337288 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1337288
(21) Application Number: 1337288
(54) English Title: HEAT SHRINKABLE WRAPS
(54) French Title: PELLICULE THERMORETRECISSABLE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B29C 61/06 (2006.01)
  • B29C 43/24 (2006.01)
  • B29C 43/52 (2006.01)
  • B29C 55/00 (2006.01)
  • B29C 55/06 (2006.01)
  • B29C 71/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DOHENY, ANTHONY J. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • KENDALL COMPANY (THE)
(71) Applicants :
  • KENDALL COMPANY (THE) (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1995-10-10
(22) Filed Date: 1989-03-17
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
170,177 (United States of America) 1988-03-18

Abstracts

English Abstract


Novel processes for preparing a heat shrinkable film
by first forming a polyolefinic film on a three-roll calender
in which the second and third rolls rotate at about the same
speed and the first roll rotates at a slower speed, the top
roll is heated to a temperature above the melting point of the
polyolefinic material, the middle roll is heated to an elevated
temperature below its melting point, and the bottom roll is
chilled relative thereto; thereafter subjecting one surface of
the resulting film to irradiation from a low energy electron
beam at a voltage such that the irradiation dose at the half-
depth of the film is approximately one half the dose at the
irradiated surface and at a current to film surface speed ratio
such that the surface dose would effect crosslinking sufficient
to impart to said film a 100% modulus at 150°C of from about 10
to about 100 pounds per square inch, if the dose at any depth
in the film were substantially equal to the surface dose; and
then subjecting the opposed surface of the film to irradiation
from a low energy beam at a voltage and at a current to speed
ratio substantially equal to that in the preceding step, such
that the 100% modulus at 150°C of the film as a whole is about
10 to about 100 pounds per square inch and the film is
characterized as being substantially uniformly crosslinked
throughout its thickness. In the preferred embodiment of this
invention a per se known adhesive layer may be applied to
provide a heat shrinkable adhesive tape.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for preparing a heat shrinkable film
comprising the steps of:
(1) depositing a mass of polyolefinic material at the nip
of the first and second rolls of a three-roll calender in which
the second and third rolls rotate at approximately the same
speed and the first roll rotates at a slower speed, said first
roll being heated to a temperature above the melting point of
said polyolefinic material, said second roll is heated to an
elevated temperature below the melting point of said
polyolefinic material, and said third roll is chilled relative
thereto;
(2) extruding said mass of polyolefinic material between
said first and second rolls to form a film adhering to the
surface of said second roll;
(3) transporting said film from said second roll around
said third roll;
(4) transporting said film from said third roll of said
calender under tension, whereby to effect partial orientation
of said film in the machine direction and to maintain
substantially all the molecular orientation imparted to said
film during said calendering steps;
(5) passing said film in the path of irradiation from a
low energy electron beam while subjecting one surface of said
film to said irradiation at voltage such that the radiation
dose at the half-depth of said film is approximately one-half
the dose at said irradiated surface and at a current to film
surface speed ratio such that the surface dose would effect
crosslinking sufficient to impart to said film a 100% modulus
at 150°C of from about 10 to about 100 pounds per square inch
if the dose at any depth in the film were substantially equal
28

to said surface dose;
(6) cooling the irradiated film to below about 100°F;
(7) passing said film in the path of irradiation from a
low energy electron beam while subjecting the opposed surface
of said film to said irradiation at a voltage and at a current
to speed ratio substantially equal to that in the irradiation
of said one surface, such that the 100% modulus at 150°C of
said film as a whole is from about 10 to about 100 pounds per
square inch and said film is characterized as being
substantially uniformly crosslinked throughout its thickness;
and
(8) molecularly orientating said film by stretching in
the machine direction at a temperature of about 90°C to about
160°C to provide a shrinkability of at least 30 percent upon
heating said film in an absence of constraints; and thereafter
(9) cooling said film under tension to maintain said
stretched condition.
2. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein the speed
ratio of rotation of said second roll to said first roll of
said three-roll calender is from about 10:1 to about 325:1.
3. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said first
roll is heated to a temperature of at least 270°F.
4. A process as defined in claim 3 wherein said third
roll is maintained at a temperature of from about 50 to about
70°F.
5. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said film
coming off said first roll is characterized in that the surface
adhering to said second roll is smooth, the opposed surface of
said film is rougher and has a matte appearance, and said film
29

is further characterized in that the internal molecular
orientation of said film formed by said calendering steps is
greater than the molecular orientation at said smooth surface
of said film.
6. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said
polyolefinic material comprises polyethylene.
7. A process as defined in claim 6 wherein said
polyethylene is a low density polyethylene.
8. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said
polyolefinic material comprises a copolymer of polyethylene and
ethyl vinyl acetate.
9. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said film
prepared by said calendering steps is from about 30 to about 50
mils thick.
10. A process as defined in claim 9 wherein the line
speed of said film passing in the path of irradiation for each
said surface irradiation step is from about 10 to about 500
feet per minute.
11. A process as defined in claim 10 wherein each said
surface dose is from about 4 to about 20 Mrads with a
penetrating potential of from about 150 to about 550 kilovolts
and a dose current of from about 0.4 to about 6.0 milliamps per
inch width of said film.
12. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said
molecular orientation step is performed while said film is at a
temperature where it is softened.

13. A process as defined in claim 12 wherein said
temperature is from about 90°C to about 160°C.
14. A process as defined in claim 1 including the step of
applying a layer of adhesive to said film, whereby to form a
heat shrinkable adhesive tape.
15. A process as defined in claim 14 wherein said
adhesive comprises a rubber-based adhesive and said tape is
adapted for use as a protective wrap for metal pipes.
16. A process for preparing a heat shrinkable film
comprising the steps of:
(1) depositing a mass of polyolefinic material at the nip
of the first and second rolls of a three-roll calender in which
the second and third rolls rotate at approximately the same
speed and the first roll rotates at a slower speed, the ratio
of rotation of said second roll to said first roll being from
about 10:1 to about 325:1, said first roll being heated to a
temperature of at least 270°F, said temperature being above the
melting point of said polyolefinic material, said second roll
is heated to an elevated temperature below the melting point of
said polyolefinic material, and said third roll is at a
temperature of from about 50 to about 70°F;
(2) extruding said mass of polyolefinic material between
said first and second rolls to form a film adhering to the
surface of said second roll;
(3) transporting said film from said second roll around
said third roll;
(4) transporting said film from said third roll of said
calender under tension, whereby to effect partial orientation
of said film in the machine direction and to maintain
substantially all the molecular orientation imparted to said
31

film during said calendering steps;
(5) passing said film in the path of irradiation from a
low energy electron beam while subjecting one surface of said
film to said irradiation at voltage such that the radiation
dose at the half-depth of said film is approximately one-half
the dose at said irradiated surface and at a current to film
surface speed ratio such that the surface dose would effect
crosslinking sufficient to impart to said film a 100% modulus
at 150°C of from about 10 to about 100 pounds per square inch
if the dose at any depth in the film were substantially equal
to said surface dose;
(6) cooling the irradiated film to below about 100°F;
(7) passing said film in the path of irradiation from a
low energy electron beam while subjecting the opposed surface
of said film to said irradiation at a voltage and at a current
to speed ratio substantially equal to that in the irradiation
of said one surface, such that the 100% modulus at 150°C of
said film as a whole is from about 10 to about 100 pounds per
square inch and said film is characterized as being
substantially uniformly crosslinked throughout its thickness;
and
(8) molecularly orientating said film by stretching in
the machine direction while said film is at an elevated
temperature of about 90°C to about 160°C in which it is in a
softened state to provide a shrinkability of at least 30
percent upon heating said film in an absence of constraints;
and thereafter
(9) cooling said film under tension to maintain said
stretched condition.
17. A process as defined in claim 16 wherein each said
surface dose is from about 4 to about 20 Mrads with a
penetrating potential of from about 150 to about 550 kilovolts
32

and a dose current of from about 0.4 to about 6.0 milliamps per
inch width of said film.
33

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


1 337288
, ~ .
TITLE: UEAT S~T~RLE ~RAPS
BACRGROU~D OF T~E INVENTION
The present invention relates to heat shrinkable films and to
adhesive tapes having a heat shrinkable backing. ~ore particularly,
it relates to heat shrinkable pipe~raps, e.g. for protecting from
- environmental forces and stresses the joints or welds of pipelines
such as those contemplated for inground implantation.
The concept of preparing heat shrinkable films is per se well
known and the patent literature is replete uith references thereto.
c In general, the prior procedures include the steps of crosslinking,
e.g. chemically or by irradiation, and stretching to orient. The use
of so-called shrinksleeves or heat shrinkable films and tapes for
pipejoints or other tubular articles is also uell known in the art.
~hile not intended to be construed to be a comprehensive survey
of the art, the following patents are nevertheless considered to be
illustrative.
U.S.P. 3,022,543 relates to a shrinkable film for packaging
foodstuffs produced by the steps of: (1) stretching a polymer such as
polyethylene above room temperature in at leas~ one direction; (2)
~c cooling to at least room temperature; (3) irradiating, preferably
with electrons at a specified dosage; (4) heating the irradiated fil~
to a temperature where it will soften sufficiently to stretch; (5)
bilaterally stretching to orient the polymer at this elevated
te~perature; and (6) cooling while under tension.
U.S.P. 3, 144,398 relates to the preparation of irradiated
polyethylene ~hich can be readily changed from a stretched to a
shrunken condition. The objectives are said to be acco~plished by
cold stretching the polyethylene at a temperature of 65'iC, and then
irradiating at a specified dosage, preferably with electrons.
~r

-2- 1 337288
U.S.P. 3,144,399 relates to an irradiated, bicxially oriented
polyethylene stretched at least 100~ in each direction and belo~ the
brea~. limit. The polyethylene is first irradiated at a specified at a
specified dosage, then heated to or beyond its transparent point, and
stretched to orient. The stretched condition is maintained while
cooling to room temperature.
U.S.P. 3,455,337 relates to a differentially irradiated
crosslinked polymeric heat recoverable article, tubing being
particularly disclosed, characterized by containing a sufficient
crosslink density near one surface to be substantially infusible and
containing a gradual decreasing density of crosslinking throughout
its thickness, the opposed surface being substantially non-
crosslinked. As is descrlbed therein, the articie is formed by first
subjecting it to a dosage of irradiation insufficient to render the
opposed surface infusible. Once the tubing h2s been differentially
crosslinked, it is heated and subjected to differential pressure
bet~een the inside and the outside, the pressure being sufficient to
cause the tube to expand in a co~trolled f2shion.
U.S.P. 3,886,0~6 has for its objective tc prepare from
polyethylene having a high crystallinity a polyethylene having highly
raised melting and softening temperatures, i~proYed transparency and
excellent dimensional stability at high teIperatures. This objective
is said to be accom?lished by irradiating ~ith a dosage of 0.2-16
~egarads to produce a crosslinked polyethylene having a gel content
of at least one weight percent; extending the crosslinked polymer in
at least one direction at a temperature of at least the anisotropic
melting point, and then cooling.
U.S.P. 3,949,110 discloses a method a method of ma~ing a heat
shrinkable tubing including the steps of irradiating the tube,
heating to at least the softening temperature, partially inflating,
and then thermosetting by cooling.

1 3~7288
U.S.P. 3,988,399 relates to heat recoverable ~raparound sleeves
for pipejoints, cables, wire splices and the like which possess the
ability to curl in involute fashion upon the application of beat. As
is disclosed, for example, in Col. 6, one or both of the primary
exterior faces can be coated ~ith a suitable adhesive.
U.S.P. 4,348,438 tiscloses a process for prepariDg shrink ~raps
from a homopolymer of ethylene or a copolymer of ethylene with up to
20 weight percent of one or more other monomers. As disclosed, the
film is uniaxially cold-oriented at a temperature of at least 5 C
below the film's melting point, irradiated ~ith ionizing radiation
and sealed along a seam running perpendicular to the direction of
orientation. The irradiation, ~hich is preferably carried out before
the orientation, is at a dosage of 1-20 Megarads, about 3 to 5
Megarads being stated to be preferred.
U.S.P. 4,469,742 relates to a multilayer cook-in shrin~ film
comprising: (1) a specified sealing layer; ~2) a shrink layer; (3) a
specified adhesive layer; (4) a barrier layer: (S) another adhesive
layer; and (6~ an abuse layer, the respective layers being being melt
bonded and irradiated to crosslink sufficient to resist delamination
during use.
U.S.P. 4,517,234 relates to a flat length of heat recoverable
material having integral latching means so that the material can be
wrapped around cable, pipe, etc., latched and then shrunX.
U.S.P. 4,521,470 relates to a system for enclosing an object by
installing consecutively or as a single article: (a) a heat-
softenable adhesive; (b) a specified thermoplastic polymeric
material; and (c~ a heat-recoverable cover, and thereafter heating to
cause recovery (shrink).
U.S.P. 4,590,020 teaches an oriented high density polyethylene
film having maximum crosslinking at the surfaces and minimum
crosslin~ing in~ardly. The ~ilm is prepared by crosslin~ing opposed
surfaces by irradiation ~ith electron rays in such a manner that tbe
degree of crosslin~ins decreases from the surfaces in~ardly so that
the outer layer portions have gel fractions bet~een 20-70~ and the
middle layer portion has a gel fraction bet~een 0-5~; and thereafter
heating and stretching to orient and ~roduce a film bet~een 10-50

~-
:~
~ :~
1 337288
64401-115
microns. As stated in Col. 3, both sides should be irradiated
with the same dosage, the penetrating power of the electron
rays being properly adjusted according to the thickness by
changing the applied voltage or by using a shield.
A heat shrinkable film may be prepared by (1)
orientating a film of polyolefinic material by stretching in
the machine direction; and, thereafter ~2) irradiating a major
surface of the oriented film with low energy radiatlon at a
- dosage sufficient to effect differential crosslinking, the
degree of crosslinking being a function of the depthwise dosage
of incident radiation, the radiation providing a differential
in dosage and, in turn, a differential in crosslinking per unit
throughout the thickness of the film, whereby the greatest
crosslinking occurs at or near the irradiated surface, the
extent of crosslinking decreasing as the distance from the
irradiated surface increases, the surface of the film opposed
from the irradiated surface being characterized as being
substantially non-crosslinked.
The polymeric material may be first formed into a
film ln accordance with the procedures disclosed in U.S.P.
2,631,954, which procedures will be described in full in the
detailed description of the present invention.
In general, the present invention is directed to
novel procedures for preparing heat shrinkable films and tapes
which provide the advantages which will be described
hereinafter. It is particularly directed to providing heat
shrinkable films and tapes which are useful as protective wraps
for tubular metal articles such as pipes, e.g. pipelines
intended for inground implantation, as well as for cables, wire
splices, and the like. The invention will accordingly be
discussed in detail hereinafter with reference to pipewraps, a
primary object of this invention.
A

1 337288
-
As alluded to above, it is ~ell kno~n in the art to provide an
over~rap for pipelines in orter to protect them fro~ degradative
stresses and forces after placement in the ground. An efficacious
protective ~rap of this description ~ill i- general comprise a rubber-
based adhesive on the pipe surface and an outer corrosion and
~eather resistant film overlying tt.e adhesive layer. Typically, this
is accomplished by a protective adhesive wrap comprising a rubber-
based adhesive carried on a polyolefinic film backing. optionally, a
primer coating may first be applied to the pipe surface in order to
ô increase adhesion.
It ~ould be most desirable to provide a so-called shrink~rap of
this description to insure complete adhesion of the tape to the pipe
and thus avoid problems such as spiral void, as will be discussed in
- -- more detail hereinafter. However, prior systems for providing a
polyeth~-lene or other polyolefinic shrinkwrap have proved inadequate
for various reasons.
As is well known, a polyolefinic film which has been oriented by
stretching in the machine direction ~ill shri~k when heated above its
crystalline melting point, due to the relaxation of the orientation.
Ho~ever, this concept is not iD itself practical for preparing
shrinkwraps for pipes. The film backing for the adhesive ~ill have no
equilibrium or "ru~bery" modulus above its melting point to generate
the stresses necessary for adhesive flo~. Accordingly, the tape ~ill
pull itself apart ~hen it shrinks against a ccnstraint, e.g. a pipe
-'~ joint.
~ Eor example, a blend of a high and a low density polyethylene
m~
such as the backing on a "980" adhesive tape ~trade decignation of
The ~endall Company, assignee of the instant invention) , comprising
a high density (~DP~) : lo~ density (LDPE) polyethylene blend, ~ill
3~ begin to shrin~ ~hen heated above tbe lo~ density peak, but it will
maintain some strength if the shrink temperature i8 belo~ the melting
point of the ~DPE. This could in theory ~e useful if tbe shrink
te=perature could be controlled to a narro~ range of about 10-15 C
bet~een the t~o melting endotherms. ~o~ever, this is not viable in
contemplated commercial applications of heat to shrink the film.

1 3 3 7 2 8 8
It is also kno~n that crosslin~ing will impart strength above
the melting point of the polyolefinic film. For instance, a method of
imparting strength to the polyethylene above its melting point(s) is
to crosslin~ so that the film's 100$ motulus at 150C is bet~een 10
and 100 pounds per square inch (p5i). This has not previously been
attractlve for commercial production, since the uniform crosslinking
of the thic~ polyethylene ~hich would be utilized requires very high
energy electron beams for the irradiation ~hich in turn would be both
expensive and require considerable manufacturing floor space for
~cJ radiation shielding.
A primary object of this invention, accordingly, is to provide a heat
shrinkable polyolefin film ~hich either carries an adhesive layer,
i.e. in the form of an adhesive tape, or which can be adhered
securely over an adhesive layer applied in a separate step around the
pipe or pipe joint.
- Another object is to provide novel procedures for preparing heat
shrinkable adhesive tapes, ~hich procedures are slmple, cost-
effective and produce tapes possessing the ad~esion and physical
characteristics for protecting articles from the degradative
-~c~ environmental forces and stresses to which they are subjected in use.
-- 6--

1 337288
- BRIE~ DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance ~ith the present invention, a heat shrinkable film
is provited by the steps of:
- (1) initially forming a film of polyolefinic material by
depositing a mass of said material at the nip of the first ant second
rolls of a three-roll calender in which the second and third rolls
rotate at about the same speet and the first roll rotates at a slower
speed, the top roll is heated to a temperature above the melting
point of the polyolefinic material, the middle roll is heated to an
elevated temperature belo~ its melting point, and the bottom roll is
chilled relative thereto;
~2) extruding the polyolefinic mass betReen the first and
second rolls to form a layer adhering to the surface of the second
roll;
(3) transporting said film from the second roll around the
third roll:
(4) transportlng said film from said caleDder under
tension, ~hereby to effect partial orientation in the machine
direction and to maintain substantially all the molecular orientation
~,~ imparted during calendering;
(5) subjecting one surface of said film to irradiation from
a lo~ energy electron beam at a voltage such that the radiation dose
at t~e balf-depth (half-thic~ness) of the film is approximately one
half ;he dose at the irradiated surface and at a current to film
surface speed ratio such that the surface dose ~ould effect
crosslin~ing sufficient to impart to said film a 100~ modulus at
150C of from about 10 to about 100 pounds per s~uare inch, if the
dose at any depth in the film ~ere substantially equal to said
surface dose;
3 ~6) cooling the irradiated film to belo~ about ioooF;

1 337288
~ 64407-115
(7) subjecting the opposed surface of said film to
said irradiation from a low energy beam at a voltage and at a
current to speed ratio substantially equal to that in the
preceding step, such that the 100% modulus at 150C of the film
as a whole is about 10 to about 100 pounds per square inch and
said film is characterized by being substantially uniformly
crosslinked throughout its thickness;
(8) molecularly orientating by stretching said film
in the machine direction (MD) at a temperature of about 90C to
about 160C to provide a shrinkability of at least about 30
percent upon reheating under no constraints (i.e. stretching);
and thereafter
(9) cooling said film under tension to maintain said
stretched condition.
In the preferred embodiment of this invention, a
rubber-based adhesive is thereafter applied to form a tape.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In order to prevent corrosion and/or other
degradative forces from attacking pipelines, it is common
practice to apply a protective cover to the surface of the
pipe. While in its simplest form, this protective cover could
be an anticorrosion coating, for optimum longevity, especially
for inground pipelines, the protective system will at least
consist of an outer film or adhesive tape which is typically
spirally wound around the pipe. For reasons which will be
apparent, such an outer wrap is generally referred to in the
pipeline protection art as a "pipewrap".
In a typical anticorrosion system currently in use, a
primer
~ Xi

1 337288
coating is first applied to the surface of the pipe and over this
primer coating a pressure-sensitive tape having a tough, abrasioD-
resistant bac~ing is then wound. In this typical pipeline laying
system, sections of pipe of predetermi~ed length, e.g. on tbe order
of 40 feet, and having a pipewrap of the foregoing teneral
description are assembled in the field for inground implantation.
If the end sections to be abutted and joined are so wrapped,
these end sections are stripped of the protective wrap and then
welded together. A protective wrap is then placed over this pipe
joint and adjacent portions of the respective pipewraps in order to
secure the ~eld or pipejoint, ~hich can be said to be the wea~est
link in the pipeline and hence requires the most protection from
environmental forces and stresses.
Uhether it be the pipewrap extending along the length of the
individual pipe sections or the wrap covering the joint between
between adjacent pipe sections, it can be stated in general that the
anticolrosion protective tapes that are applied to inground pipeline
structures are often subjected to rather severe long-term shearing
forces derived from the surrounding soil. The magnitude of these
shearing forces depends on several factors, including among others:
(a) the type of soil; (~) the tectonic forces sur ounding the
implanted pipeline; (c~ the size of the pipe; (d) axial site
emplacement; and (e) the range of thermal expansion as well as the
pipe contents.
The result of the long-term shear forces on a pipeline
protective coating is referred to as "soil stress". Soil stress on an
anticorrosion protective coating generally results from the
structural shear forces wh_ch cause tbe protective coating to creep
along the pipeline peripheral surface. Creep is in essence a long-
term visco-elastic, or "cold flow" phenomenon, common to all
polymeric substances. The amount of creep Will depend upon the
physical properties of a coating.. Since the physical properties,
(i.e. modulus) of a coating will be temperature dependent,
temperature becomes a decisive element in determining the amount of
creep. At low temperatures, the propensity to creep will be

- l 337288
,~
substantially reduced, ~hile at elevated temperature~, the likelihood
of creep will be significantly increased, other factors remaining the
same.
The prior art has addressed these problems with various chemical
approaches directed to improving the cobesive nature of the
adheiive,thereby increasing the resistance to shear and creep.
However, improvements in the chemistry of the adhesive system
cannot be a total solution to the problems created by soil stress and
creep. The physical characteristics andtor geometry of the pipewrap
~o inherently provide areas of the pipe which are not adequately adhered
to the tape. This is true even if the pipe surface is smooth and
uniform.
Uhen the tape is wound over the surface of the pipe, an overlap
area is created where the thic~ness of this overlap area is equal to
twice the thickness of the tape. The overlap runs a spiral path along
the length of the plpe, and the presence of this spiral overlap poses
three problems ~hich may co~promise the protective function of the
tape over the pipe surface:
(1) the thickness differential projected 2t the surface of the
~c overlap results in increased frictional resistance when the pipe
moves against the soil and/or against any support s~ids, which high
frictional resistance may result in a failure of the overlap bond
and/or wrinkling of the tape, thereby ultimately permitting liquid to
corrode and damage the pipe;
(2) the thic~ness differenlial at the underside ~bottom3 of the
overlap results in the formation of an interstice at the termination
of the lower adherent (tape ~ound around the pipe3, ~hich interstice
running along the length of the pipe as a spiral is called the
"spiral void", the presence of ~hich eventually results in corrosion
,c of the metal pipe; and

1 337288
(3) when the protective tape is subjected to the action of soil
stresses ant application tensions ~residual stresses), the overlap
bond is pulled apart; severe cleavage stresses are induced at the
terminal points of the overlap ~hen it is pulled apart in this
fashion, causing a stress concentration on the overlap edges ~hich
may refult in failure of the overlap bond.
The physical problems such as spiral void can in theory be
substantially eliminated if the adhesive wrap could be adhered
completely to the underlying substrate. 80~ever, this is not
' feasible ~ith the wrapping operations ~hich ~ould normally be applied
in the field.
The principles of shrin~ Rraps, such as are commonly employed
~ith thin films for packaging of foodstuffs, ~ould theoretically
provide a solution to this problem. ~o~ever, no satisfactory method
of applying the principles of heat shrinkable films to pipe~raps has
heretofore been kno~n in the art.
As mentioned, from a chemical standpoint, the most effective
anticorrosion coating system for resisting en~ironmental forces such
as soil stress utilizes a rubber-based adhesive and a polyolefinic
2c~ outer ~rap or adhesive backing.
A typical rubber-based adhesive for this purpose may, for
example, include a blend of virgin butyl rubber, reclaimed butyl
rubber andtor Datural butyl rubber along with tackifiers, fillers and
various other additives performing specific desired functions, e.g.
antioxidants , bactericides, crosslinking ageDts, etc.
It may, for example, be a rubber-based adhesive such as is
described in U.S.P. 4,268,334 issued to George ~. ~arris and Samuel
J. Thomas or U.S.P. 4,472,231 issued to Robert F. Jenkins, both of
~hich are assigned to the assignee of the instant invention.
Prefe-red backino materials are the polyolefins, particularly
homopolymers or copolymers of ethylene, including blends of
polyolefins with other polyolefins and/cr other polymeric materials.
- As previously staSed, the present invention is directed to heat
shrin~able films and tapes ~hich are particularly useful in obviating
the above-mentioned problems in protecting pipelines, particularly
-- -- 11

- 1 337288
those wbich are subjected to the abo~enotet inground environmental
stresses. It ~ill howe~er be appreciated by those s~illed in the art
that these films and tapes ~ill also find utility in other
applications such as, for example, protective ~raps for cables,,
~ires, ~ire splices, and the like.
The present invention is also directed to novel processes for
preparing heat shrinkable films and tapes, which processes lend
themselves.
As previously stated in the "~RIEF DESC~IPTION OF T~E
~ .
. . ~a INVENTION", in accordance ~ith these novel procedures, a heat
shrin~able film is provided by the steps of:
(1) initially forming a film of polyolefinic material by
depositing a mass of said material at the nip of the first and second
rolls of a three-roll calenter in which the second and third rolls
rotate at about the same speed and the first roll rotates at a slower
speed, the top roll is heated to a temperature above the melting
point of the polyolefinic material, the middle roll is heated to an
elevated temperature below its melting point, and the bottom roll is
chillea relative thereto;
--- .lO (2) extruding the polyolefinic mass between the first and
second rolls to form a layer adhering to the surface of the second
roll;
(3) transporting said film from the second roll around the
third roll;
(4) traDsporting said film from said calender under
tension, whereby to effect partial orientation in the machine
direction and to maintain substantially all the molecular orientation
imparted during calendering;
(5) subjecting one surface of said film to irradiation from
.~ a low energy electron beam at a voltage such that the radiation dose
at the half-depth of the film is approximately one-half the dose at
the irradiated surface and at a current to film surface speed ratio
such that the surface dose would effect crosslinking sufficient to
.
-~ impart to said film a 100~ modulus at 150C of from about 10 to 100
12 - -

1 337288
~ 64407-llS
pounds per square inch, if the dose at any depth in the film
were substantially equal to said surface dose;
(6) cooling the irradiated film to below about
100F
t7) subjecting the opposed surface of said film to
said irradiation from a low energy beam at a voltage and at a
current to speed ratio substantially equal to that in the
preceding step (5~, such that the 100% modulus at 150C of the
film as a whole is from about 10 to about 100 pounds per square
inch and said film is characterized as being substantially
uniformly crosslinked throughout its thickness;
(8) molecularly orientating by stretching said film
in the machine direction (MD) at a temperature of about 90C to
about 160 C to provide a shrinkability of at least about 25
percent upon reheating under no constraints; and thereafter;
(9) cooling said film under tension to maintain said
stretched condition.
Each of the calendering, irradiation and orientation
steps are critical in the practice of this invention.
With respect to the calendering step for first
forming a film from a mass of polyolefinic material, it has
been found to be essential that the film be formed initially on
the described 3-roll calender, which calender is disclosed, for
example, in the aforementioned U.S.P. 2,631,954. The reason
for this criticality is not clearly understood, but it is
believed to be due, at least in part, to the significant
orientation which occurs as a function of the described
calendering operation, and at least in part due to the physical
properties of the film formed in this operation.
As was mentioned, the top (first) roll of the
calender is heated above the melting point of the particular
rx~ . -

~ 2 8 64407-115
polyolefinic material employed to PrlP3are t~e film. By way of
illustration, with polyethylene a temperature of at least 270F
would be utilized for this roll. The middle or second roll is
heated to an elevated temperature below the melting point of
the polymer, e.g. on the order of 190F for polyethylene.
Preferably the heating of these two rolls is done internally.
The third or bottom roll of the calender will be
,,. ~

- 1 337288
chilled relative thereto, e.g. to a surface temperature on the order
of from about 50 to about 700F.
Also as ~as stated above and in the aforementionet patent, the
secont and tbird rolls are rotated at about the same speed ant the
first roll i8 rotated at a slo~er speed. ~hile the patent speaks of
a speed ratio of the second to first roll of from 5:1 to 30:1, in
accordance ~ith tbe present invention, the speed ~ill preferably be
ad~usted to a higher ratio, e.g. from about 10:1 to about 325:1.
Since the films of this invention should ideally have a
. ..
"' thickness after orientation and stretching of on the order of 30-50
mils, it ~ill be appreciated that the nip or gap bet~eeD the rollers
~ill be adjusted accordingly to provide a film ~hich prior to
orientation is appropriately thic~er. As ~ill be understood, the
particular thickness ~ill be dependent upon the amount of stretching
needed and therefore is not susceptible to precise quantification.
Ho~ever, the desired thickness to be obtained in this calendering
operation may be readily calculated by those skilled iD the art by
determining the delta (difference) in thickness before and after
orientation and thus ascertaining the initial thic~ness needed to
2~ provide a film of a given thickness after stresching.
In operation, the desired ga~ is ascertained and a bank of the
polyoleflnic material is deposited bet~een the nip of the first and
second rollers. This ~ass of material is extruded between the t~o
rollers to form a layer adherent to the surface of the second roller.
It is then carried to the third roller ~here it is stripped from the
second roller. It then passes around the third roller to a takeup
roll. The resulting fil~ is observed to have different surface
characteristics. Uhile the surface adhering to tbe second roll is
smooth, the opposed surface is rougher and has a matte appearance. As
is explained, for example, in Col. 4 of U.S.P. 2,631,954, the upper
roll surface, advancing at less speed, causes dra~ on the material so
that the upper surface of the sheet comes off the upper roll at a
speed greater than the speed of the upper roll, causing the roughness
as ~ell as a difference in the degree of molecular orientation
through the thic~Dess of the sheet ~ith an iDternal molecular

1 337288
orientation greater tban the molecular orientation at the smooth ~ -
surface. [~hile not wishing to be limited to any particular tbeory, '--
it is believed that this difference in degree of molecular
orientation may at least in part explain the superior results in --
terms of end protuct obtained with this specific calendering -
operation to form the film as distinguisbet from other means by which
the film may be formed, e.g. ex.rusion, a different type of calender,
etc.]
In any event, preparing the film in this manner has been fount
~v ~ to provide a molecular orientation in the machine direction which,
,~
~hile significant, i8 not completely relaxable after the appropriate
degree of crosslinking and will not provide a shrink film which, upon
application of heat in known manner will shrink the desired amount in
accordance uith this invention, namely at least 25 percent under no
constraint.
Another critical aspect of this invention is the crosslinking
step necessary to impart dimensional stability to the film. ~hile
significant orientation ~ill occur duriDg the aforementioned
calendering operation, the resulting film lacks the dimensional ,-
stability needed to provide a useful heat shrinkable film. For
instaDce , while tbe orientation in this manner may provide an
orientation substantially equivalent to stretching on the order of
100% to ~00~, i.e. an elongation from 100 units of measure to about
400 units of measure, the resulting film ~ill possess an elastic
memory to impart sbrinkability but will fall apart. Accordingly, it
will be useless for its contemplated purpose.For this reason,
crosslinking is required.
In accordance with this invention, the re~uisite crosslinking is
obtained in what may be termed a two-stage process utilizing lo~
energy radiation. Conceptually, it may be possible to use either
neutral particles, charged particles, or electromagnetic radiation to
effect the crosslinking. ~owever, the preferred source is low energy
electron beam (E3).
In the practice of this invention, the sum total of the -~ -
crossljn~ino should provide a substantial depthwise uniformity in
crosslin~ in order to prevent tensile rupture in areas ~b~ou~hout
- - 1

1 337288
the thic~ness of lesser crosslinking. The radiation to produce this
uniform crosslinking is accomplished by irradiating first one surface
of the film ~ith lo~ energy radiation and thereafter so irradiating
. . . ~. . . -
the opposed surface, the su~ total being sufficient to pro~ide the
uniform crosslinking and a hot modulus (at 150C) of from about 10 to
about 100 psi, preferably about 15 to about 50 psi.
The modulus may be determined utilizing per se ~no~n
instrumentation and techniques. One procedure, for instance, utilizes
: ` (f~od -,n~r.~ )
an Instron/in which a piece of film, say, for example, l"x4" is
stretched to 8", held at that length for about one minute and the
amount of force required to hold it at this distance is then
calculated.
The radiation required to provide a given modulus ~ithin the
recited range is not capable of precise quantification since it ~ill
be understood that it is dependent upon such variable factors as line
spee~ through the irradiation source, film ~eight (grams per square
meter),film COmpoSitioD, etc. Ho~ever, the needed radiation may be
readily calculated by the skllled practitioner, based upon dosage
determined by routine experimentation ~ithiD ~e expected judgment of
~O the skilled ~orker having before him the foresoing description.
Once the dosage required to effect the required crosslin~lng OD
the film surface is determined, the treatnent voltage for each side
in the t~o-stage irradiation uill be such that the midpoint of the
thickness for each treatment ~ill receive approximately 50~ of the
surface dose. In this manner, following the t~o-stage irradiation
wherein each surface is irradiated, the middle portion of the film
thic~ness ~ill have received approximately the same dosaqe as each
- --- surface.
By ~ay of illustration, to crosslink a polyolefinic film on the
sc order of 30-50 mils thick and traveling at a line speed on tbe order
of 30-40 feet per minute, a surface dose of on the order of 15-20
~rads with a penetrating potential of on the order of 150-300
kilovolts and a dose current of on the order of 1.6 to 2.0 milliamps
per inch ~idth has been found effective to provide the desired
modulus.
1~

1 337288 64407-115
Since such radiation treatment provides a surface
temperature of on the order of 180F, it is not feasible to
subject each film surface to irradiation simultaneously.
Accordingly, after the initial surface irradiation, i.e. after
irradiating the first film surface, the partially lrradiated
film must be allowed to cool, e.g. below 100F before
irradiating the opposed surface.
To recapitulate, crosslinking is effected with low
energy radiation in a two-stage system wherein in the first
step, one surface is irradiated at a dosage sufficient to
provide the desired crosslinking at the irradiated surface and
about one-half the dosage required to obtain the same degree of
crosslinking at the midpoint of the film thickness; and in the
second step, the opposed surface is subjected to the same
degree of radiation dosage so that the sum total of the two
radiation stages provides about the same degree of crosslinking
in the middle portlon of the film thickness as on either
surface.
The final step in the preparation of the heat
shrinkable films of this invention is the molecular orientation
or stretching in the machine direction necessary to impart the
desired degree of shrinking upon application of heat to relax
the film and thus allow the elastic memory to permit at least
partial recovery of the film length.
For practical applications in the protection of
pipelines, the film should have the capability of shrinking at
least 25% and, most preferably, on the order of 30 to 50%.
However, as previously mentioned the film has received an
initial orientation during the calendering operation. For
- - 30 example, it may, after calendering, have the capability of
shrinking, say, from 100 units to 85 units with a corresponding
increase in width (cross direction) of from, say, 100 units to
X 17

1 337288
64407-115
106 units. In this hypothetical, a further machine direction
stretching of 100 to 125 units at substantially constant wldth
would be required to provide a film capable of shrinking 32%
upon heating, i.e. from 100 units to 68 units.
Orientation to effect stretching may be accomplished
in per se known manner by heating to soften, e.g. to a
temperature on the order of 90C to 160C and then applylng the
required amount of tension in
X;~
~ 17a

t 337288
the machine direction to cause the desired elongation. Uhile
maintaining this tension, the film is then cooled do~n to prevent
recovery. The tension is then releaset.
To prepare a heat shrinkable tape, a suitable adhesive may then
be applied on one surface, e.g. by extrusion coatir.q or other ~nown
coating techniques. Preferably, a lo~ temperature adhesive will be
employed to minimize relaxation of the orientation during the coating
step for applying the adhesive to the shrinkable film bac~ing.
The particular materials vhich may be selected in the practice
,o of this invention may be any of those heretofore kno~n in the art for
preparing heat shrinkable films and pipewraps. Accordingly, this
selection per se comprises no part of the present invention and may,
to a degree, be a matter of individual whim.
By ~ay of illustration, ho~ever, the polyolefinic materials
~hich may be employed are in general characterized as being heat
shrinkable (or heat recoverable, as they are sometimes referred to
in the art) materials having the properties of elastic memory
imparted to them by the crosslinking and orientation. The preferred
materials are the polyethylenes, e.g. low density polyethylene
.c~ (LDPE), ~edium density polyethylene (MDPE), high density polyethylene
tHDPE), very low or ultra lov density polyethylene ~VLDPE), and
linear lo~ density polyetbylene (LLDPE), including blends thereof.
As examples of other useful polymers ~hich may be used alone or
in combination ~ith polyethylene, mention may be made of ethylene
vinyl acetate copolymers, eehylene propylene rubber, EPDM,
polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyisobutylene, conjugated diene
butyl, butyl rubber, etc.
The polyolefinic materials may, if desired, be blended to form a
mixture of polymers along ~ith other reagents performing specific
3 c- desired functions for the film, e.g. a colorant such as carbon blac~.
This blending may be done, for instance, in a 2-roll mill and the
resultin~ blend, in its heated condition, may then be transported to
the calendering op~ration.
-- -- 1~ -- --

1 337288
In like manner, the particular adhesives employed may be
selected from those heretofore employed in protective pipewraps, e.g.
rubber-based adhesives such as those heretofore mentioned, asphalt-
rubber adhesives, and the like. Since the adhesives ~hich may be
utilized in tbe practice of this invention may be any of those per se
known and used in the adhesive tape art, e.g. the protective pipe~rap
art, the selection of the particular adhesive may be considered to be
a matter of indiYidual choice and per se comprises no part of this
invention. In like manner, the particular adhesive thickness as well
as the manner of application to the heat shrinkable film ~ill be a
matter of choice ~ithi~ the expected judgment of the skilled ~or~er.
In general, thicknesses on the order of 30-40 mils are
considered to be typical, although greater or lesser thicknesses are
contemplated where found desirable or expedient to do so.
~ hile casting, extrusion coating and the like may be utilized,
calendering has been found to be a particularly efficacious method
for applying the adhesive from a manufacturing standpoint.
~ nile the preferred form of this invention is directed to heat
shrinkab~e adhesive tapes, it is to be expressly understood that heat
shrinkable films prepared by this invention are also highly useful.
As is known, for example, a layer of a suitable adhesive, e.g. a
rubber-asphalt adhesive layer on the order of 60 mils thick may first
be applied to a metal pipe and the heat shrinkable film then spirally
~ound thereover to provide a protective wrap.
The follo~ing exa~ples sho~ by way of illustration and not by
~ay of limitation the practice of this invention.
_ Iq _

; ' 1 3372~8
~ 1
Lo~ Density Polyethylene ~LDPEl ~ilm
99 parts by ~eight of lo~ density polyethylene (melt index,2.0
and specific gravity 0.920) and one part by ~eight of carbon blac~
pigment along ~ith 500 parts per million of an antioxidant of the
thiobisphenol type uere millet together and then calendered on a
three-roll mill as previously described in ~hich the second roll ~as
rotated at a surface speed of a~out 27 feet per minute (fpm) and had
a surface temperature of about 160F; the first roll rotated at a
.; /O speed of about 2 fpm and had a surface temperature of about 420F;
and the third roll rotated at about the same speed as the second roll
and had a surface temperature of about 65F, to provide a film
appro~imately 36 mils thick and having an areal density of 849 grams
per square meter (g/m2). ~hen heated to 3000~ for any length of time,
the resulting film will shrink 2bout 7Q~ in the axial (machine~
direction and e~pand 50~ in the transverse (cross) direction and 100$
in thic~ness. ~o~eYer, the film has no strength at 150C and
accordingly is not useful as a shrink ~rap.
E5~PLE 2
2c ~DPE/EVA Copolymer ~
62.5 parts by ~eight of the lo~ density polyethylene recited in
Example 1, 35 parts by -~eight of a copolymer of ethylene and vinyl
acetate containing 17~ vinyl acetate (melt index, 1.8, specific
gravity 0.937) and 2.5 parts by ~eight of carbon blac~ along with 520
ppm of the antioxidant described in Example 1 were milled together
and then calendered on a three-roll calender as in the preceting
example, except that the first roll had a surface temperature of
about 415F. The resulting film ~as approximately 34 mils thic~ and
- 26 - .

1 337288
possessed an areal density of 796g/m2. ~hen heated to 300~ for any
length of time, the film shrunk about 65% in the axial direction and
expanded about 45~ in the trans~erse direction and about 138% in
thickness. ~o~ever, as in Example 1, it had no strength at 150C and
accordingly was not useful as a shrink ~rap.
The follo~ing t~o examples show by way of illustration the
mental processes one may follo~, if needed, to ascertain the proper
irradiation conditions to be follo~ed in accordance ~ith the
foregoing description.
E5a~PL~ 3
From standard curves for beam penetration as a function of
electron beam voltage and areal density, it can easily be calculated
that at 250 kV a bilateral irradiation of an 849 g/m2 film (e.g. as
prepared in ~xample 1) Will produce a dose at the midline roughly ~0%
of the surface dose. A sheet of the film as prepared in Example 1 ~as
irradiated on one su.face at 250 kV on an Energy Sciences
Electrocur~ainlat 30 frm at five current densities ranging from 0.75
to 1.75 milliamps per inch. The no~inal doses ranged from 9 to 21
MRad. The film ~as t~.en ccoled belo~ 100F and the opposed surface of
2c~ the film ~as then irradiated under the same processing conditions.
The resulting sheets of film were testet fcr 100% modulus at 150C
and were found to exhibit an approximately linear variation of
modulus ~ith nominal dose given by:
.'4 (150C)= -10 + 1.5R
~here Ml (150C) is the 100~ modulus at 150C in psi;and
R is the nominal dose in MRad.
Thus, for an Ml (150C) of 20psi, a dose of 20 Mrad is
predicted. Fro~ data developed, such a sheet ~ould have a 150C
shrink force of 2 oz/in, an axial shrinkage of 14~, a transverse
o expansion of 8~ and a thickness expansion of 9~. Such a film ~ill
fiDd utility as a shrink film, but does not have sufficient shrink
force or axial shrin~ability to be useful as a shrink ~rap for pipes
and the like as contemplated by this invention.

1 337288
E~AKPL~ 4
From standard curves for beam penetration as a function of
electron beam voltage and areal density, it is calculated that at
250 kV a bilateral irradiation of a 796 g/m2 film ~e.s. as prepared
in Example 2) ~ill produce a dose at the midline roughly 85% of the
surface dose. A sheet of film as prepared in Example 2 was irradiated
on one surface at 250 kV on an Energy Sciences Electrocurtain at 30
fpm and at five current densities from 0.75 to 1.75 milliamps per
inch. The nominal doses ranged from 9 to 21 MRad. The resulting
J~ sheets of film were tested for 100% modulus at 1~0C and were found
to exhibit an approximately linear variation of modulus with nominal
dose given by:
Ml (150C) = -10.3 + 1.8 R. Thus, for an Ml ~150C) of 20
psi, a dose of 16.5 MRad is predicted. From data developed, such a
sheet of film would have a 150C shrink force of 2 oz/in, an axial
shrinkage of 17%, a transverse expansion of 6~ and a thickness
expansion of 12%. As in the preceding example, this film ~ill find
usefulness as a shrinkable film from the standpoint of modulus, but
again does not have sufficient shrink force or axial shrinkability to
2~ render it useful as a shrinkwrap for pipes as envisioned by the
primary objective of this invention..
In the previous two examples, it will be seen that the resulting
shrinkable films will not provide the requisite shrinkability upon
orientation, i.e. a shrinkability of at least 30% upon reheating
under no constraints. From tbe data generated and the observations -
learned, the following examples sho~ by uay of illustration the
preparation of heat shrinkable wraps in accordance with the primary
objectives of this invention.
_ ~ 2 -

1 337288
.
.: ~.......................................................... .
EXA~PL~ 5
A sheet of film as prepared in Example 1 i9 irradiated on one
surface ~hile traveling beneath the Electrocurtain lo~ energy ~~ '~5
electron beas at 35 fpm, the irradiation being at 270 ~V and 1.9
milliamps/in. The nominal dose was calculated at l9MRad. The film was
then cooled below 100F and the opposed surface ~as subjected to the
same dosage. The dose at the sheet midline uas no~ calculated to be
roughly equal to the surface dose. The irradiated surface of the
sheet reached a temperature over 180F during each pass and emerged
,o from the processor at about 140F. ~hen wrapped in the roll the sheet
temperature is between 90 and 100F and it was allowed to cool before
irradiating the opposed surface. The value of Ml ~15~C) was
measured at 25.7 psi, the shrinkage force at 3 oz/in, the axial
shrinkage at 21~, and the transverse expansion at 9~. The modulus,
Ml (150C), is higher because of the greater average dose, but the
. greater axial shrinkage is a result of the inevitable stretching
occurring in pulling the hot sheet through the electron beam
processor. It is to be noted, however, that absent the further
orientation step uhich follows, the shrink force and axial shrinkage
are still Dot high enough for the contemplated usage as a shrink wrap
for metal pipes or other tubular articles.
~AXPL~ 6
The irradiated sheet as prepared in Example 5 was subjected to a
post dra~ing operation which is less drastic and easier to control
from a manufacturing standpoint tban the postdrawing (stretching)
operations co~mon to prior com~ercial production of shrin~able films.
The sheet ~as run from a slo~ roll to a fast roll both running at a
surface temperature of about 2500r and a speed ratio of 1.33 and then
, ...... ~
23 _ _

~ 1 337288 64407-115
cooled under tension. The differentially driven rolls were
spaced less than 0.1 inch apart with the sheet S-wrapped over
the rolls. The sheet loses 30% ln thickness and 4% ln width.
The desired draw ratio was calculated from the following
equation:
1 - l/lo - S
D
where S is the desired axial shrinkage for a shrink wrap;
and l/lo is the axial ratio of crosslinked calendered sheet
before drawing, i.e. 1-So, where So is the axial shrinkage
before drawing. In the instant example, the desired value of
S~40%, l/lo is 0.79. Accordingly, D should be 1.32. In this
example, with D~1.33 and 1/10-0.79, the predicted value of
S-40.6%. The measured value was 40.8% with a transverse
expansion of 15%, a thickness increase of 54%, and a shrink
force of 9 oz/in.
EXAMPLE 7
To prepare a heat shrinkable adhesive tape, the
shrinkable film as prepared in Example 6 was laminated to a
rubber-based adhesive at a temperature below the melting point
of the LPDE film in a calender while maintaining a tension on
the film sufficient to overcome any axial shrinkage. The
adhesive was formulated with regard to the available shrink
force of the sheet at 150C so that the forces exerted against
constraints by the shrinkage of the film will force the
adhesive into voids, crevices and the like during shrinkage on
a pipe.
IX l
:~: , .,
., ,

1 337288
~- 64407-115
EXAMPLE 8
The film prepared in Example 2 was bilaterally
irradiated in the manner described in Example 5 at 50 fpm, 260
kV and 2.1 milliamps/in. The nominal dose was calculated at
14.5 MRad. The dose at the sheet midline was now calculated to
be roughly equal to the surface dose. The irradiated surface
of the sheet reached a temperature of 170F during each pass
and emerged from the processor at about 130F. When wrapped in
the roll, the sheet temperature was between about 100 and about
110F and it was allowed to cool before subjecting the opposed
surface to irradiation. The M100 (150C) was measured at 23.1
psi, the shrinkage force at 3 oz/in, the axial shrinkage at
18%, and the transverse expansion at 8%. The modulus as in
Example 5 was again higher than predicted because of the
greater average dose, but the greater axial shrinkage was due
to the inevitable stretching occurring in pulling the hot sheet
through the electron beam processor. The shrink force and
axial shrinkage (as in Example 5) were still not high enough
for the contemplated usage as a shrink wrap without the further
orientation step which follows.
EXAMPLE 9
The irradiated sheet as prepared in Example 8 was ---
subjected to a post drawing operation in the manner described
in Example 6, except that the speed ratio of the rolls was
1.30. The sheet lost about 22~ in thickness and 2% in width.
With respect to the equation as described in Example 6, in the
instant example the desired value of S was 38%, L/Lo was 0.82,
and D should accordingly be 1.32. In this example with 0=1.30
and L/Lo-0.82, the predicted value of S is 36.9. The measured
value was 36.6 with a transverse expansion of 9%, a thickness
increase of 41%, and a shrink force of 5 oz/in.
`i: V
~1
~ ,~
. ~ .

1 337288
~ 10
A beat shrinkable adhesive tape ~as prepared from the shrinkable
film of Example 9 according to the procedures described in E~ample 7.
From the foregoing description and illustrative examples it will
thus be seen that the present invention provides an elegant procedure
for the manufacture of heat shrinkable films and tapes which find
particular utility as protective ~raps for metal pipes and other
tubular articles.
More specifically, the present invention is characterized by
great efficiency, the use of very high surface dose rates and speed
of manufacture without melting of the film or relaxing the inherent
orientation. The calendering step of fil~ manu.acture, ~hich as
previously stated is a critical aspect of this invention, imparts
about one-half of the eventual orientation ~hich in turn permits the
production of thinner sheets ~hich can ~e irrad:ated faster ~ith
safer and less expensive irradiation. The stretching is simpler and
faster, less dra~ is required (e.g. 30% vs. the usual ~0-~00% co~mon
to prior procedures) ~hich in turn means less cross direction
expansion on shrinking. No post stretching annealing is required.
1 ~ The opposed surfaces can be differentially treated where found
desirable or expedient to do so. For example, one surface could be
treated for release while the opposed surface to ~hich the adhesive
layer is to be applied could be treated to increase adhesion. It is
also postulated that the surfaces could be treated at different
levels to cause the f ilm to curl as it is shrunk. Moreover,
conceptually the film interior could be less crosslinked to provide
more stress relaxation, if desired.

- 1 3 3 7 2 8 8
It ~ill be appreciated that various changes ~ay be made ~ithout
departing from the invention described in tbe foregoing
specirication. For example, for purposes of illustration reference
has been made to passin~ the film in the path of irratiation at a
line speed of from about 30-40 feet per minute. ~o~ever, it is
visualized that line speeds on the order of about 10 to about 500
feet per minute may be employed. In like manner, ~hile reference has
been made to a surface dose of from about 15-20Mrads with a
penetrating potential of from about 150-300 kilovolts and a dose
.,
`~ - /o current of from about 1.6 to about 2.0 milliamps per inch width,
generally speaking it is contemplated that one may employ a surface
dose of from about 4 to about 20 Mrads with a penetrating potential
of from about 150 to about 550 kilovolts and a dose current of from
about 0.4 to about 6.0 milliamps per inch wid;h of film to obtain the
desired crosslin~ing.
Since certain changes may be made without departing from the
scope of the invention herein involved, it is ntended that all
matter described in the foregoing specification, including the
examples, shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting
sense.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1337288 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2000-10-10
Letter Sent 1999-10-12
Grant by Issuance 1995-10-10

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (category 1, 2nd anniv.) - standard 1997-10-10 1997-09-17
MF (category 1, 3rd anniv.) - standard 1998-10-13 1998-09-23
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KENDALL COMPANY (THE)
Past Owners on Record
ANTHONY J. DOHENY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1995-10-09 29 1,064
Abstract 1995-10-09 1 36
Claims 1995-10-09 6 174
Maintenance Fee Notice 1999-11-08 1 178
Examiner Requisition 1993-01-24 2 89
Prosecution correspondence 1993-05-24 3 99
Examiner Requisition 1994-02-01 2 108
Prosecution correspondence 1994-02-01 2 41
PCT Correspondence 1995-07-27 1 29
Prosecution correspondence 1995-05-01 1 37