Language selection

Search

Patent 1340551 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1340551
(21) Application Number: 1340551
(54) English Title: APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING A DIGITIZED SIGNAL OF AN IMAGE TO INCORPORATE AN AIRBRUSH EFFECT
(54) French Title: APPAREIL ET METHODE POUR TRANSFORMER LE SIGNAL NUMERISE D'UNE IMAGE, DE FACON A INCORPORER UN EFFET DE PINCEAU A AIR
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H04N 1/387 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BRONSKILL, JOHN F. (Canada)
  • JAFFRAY, IAN (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • IMAGEWARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPEMENT INC.
  • AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • IMAGEWARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPEMENT INC. (Canada)
  • AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1999-05-18
(22) Filed Date: 1989-09-22
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
07/387,049 (Canada) 1989-07-31

Abstracts

English Abstract


The apparatus and method employ a variety of
units, including Laplacian filters, rank value filters,
edge detectors, gain units and summation units, to
transform an input digitized signal of an image, the
transformation being carried out for each pixel
independently. The various elements are combined to
produce a variety of desired visual effects, e.g. an
airbrush effect. Further, an apparatus is provided in
which a conditioning unit generates a conditioning
function, which enables different parts of an image to be
combined in accordance with different methods. Thus, a
foreground of an image could have the edge content
reinforced, whilst the background has brush stroke texture
added.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-28-
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN
EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE
DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. An apparatus for transforming a digitized
signal of an image, to include an airbrush effect the
apparatus comprising: means for generating, for each
pixel, first and second random numbers corresponding to
the first and second coordinates for that pixel, and
summation means for adding, for each pixel, the two
corresponding random numbers to the two corresponding
coordinates respectively, to produce output coordinates,
whereby the pixels of the original image are scattered
randomly in the output image in dependence upon the random
numbers generated; and a rank value filter connected to
the summation means to receive the output coordinates
therefrom and for performing a rank value operation, and
having an output for a transformed image.
2. An apparatus as claimed in claim 1, which
additionally includes means for generating a constant
gain, which can be varied by a user, and means for
multiplying the random numbers for each pixel by the gain
value from the constant gain means, whereby adjustment of
the gain value enables the degree of scattering of the
pixels to be varied.
3. A system for incorporating two or more effects
into an input digitized signal of an image, the system
comprising a conditioning unit for generating a
conditioning signal, and at least two selected apparatus,
each for providing a different effect, the input digitized
signal being connected to the input of the conditioning
unit and the inputs of the selected apparatus; and an
image composition unit having inputs connected to the
outputs of the selected apparatus and an output of the
conditioning unit, the image composition unit composing an
output image by selective combination of the outputs of
the selected apparatus as determined by the conditioning
signal;

-29-
wherein the selected apparatus are selected
from the group comprising:
(a) a first apparatus for adding an airbrush
effect to a digitized signal of an image, the apparatus
comprising means for generating, for each pixel, first and
second random numbers corresponding to the first and
second coordinates for that pixel, and summation means for
adding, for each pixel, the two corresponding random
numbers to the two corresponding coordinates respectively,
to produce output coordinates, whereby the pixels of the
original image are scattered randomly in the output image
in dependence upon the random numbers generated;
(b) a second apparatus for transforming a
digitized signal of an image to give a brush stroke
effect, the apparatus comprising a main input, a first
rank value filter having an input for an original
digitized signal, connected to the main input of the
apparatus, a Laplacian unit having an input connected to
an output of the rank value filter and an output, a gain
unit with variable gain and connected to the output of the
Laplacian unit, a summation unit having one input
connected to an output of the gain unit and an output
forming an output of the apparatus, and a bypass line
connected between the output of the first rank value
filter and another input of the summation unit; and
(c) a third apparatus, for transforming an
input digitized signal of an image comprising a plurality
of pixels to give the appearance of a reflective surface,
the apparatus comprising: an input for an original
digitized signal of an input image; an input for a
reflected digitized signal of an image to be reflected in
the input image; means for generating smoothness constants
for the two coordinates of the pixels representative of
the surface smoothness; means for generating image extent
constants representative of the image extent of the pixels
in the two coordinate directions; means for checking, for
each coordinate of each pixel, whether a first intensity,
being the intensity of the respective pixel of the input
image, is the same as the second intensity of another

-30-
pixel of the input image spaced along the respective
coordinate by the respective coordinate smoothness
constant; setting means for setting, for each coordinate
of each pixel, the respective coordinate equal to the
coordinate of the input image when said checking means
determines that the first and second intensities are the
same, and otherwise, for setting the coordinate equal to
the coordinate image extent constant divided by .pi. and
multiplied by the arc tangent of the respective coordinate
smoothness constant divided by the difference between the
first intensity minus the second intensity; and means for
determining, for each pixel, the intensity in a
transformed output image by taking the intensity of a
corresponding pixel in the reflected digitized signal
determined by the coordinates set by said setting means.
4. A system as claimed in claim 3 , wherein each
smoothness constant is one.
5. A method of producing a transformed image,
including an airbrush effect,of a digitized signal of an
image, the method comprising, in the following order, the
following steps:
(i) for each pixel generating first and second
random numbers corresponding to the first and second
coordinates for that pixel;
(ii) for each coordinate of each pixel, adding
the respective random number to that coordinate to produce
an output coordinate, whereby the pixels of the original
image are scattered randomly in an output image in
dependence upon the random numbers generated; and
(iii) passing the output coordinates through a
rank value filter, to effect a rank value operation on the
output coordinates, to produce the transformed image.
6. A method as claimed in claim 5, wherein step
(i) includes the additional step of multiplying each
random number by a preset gain, whereby varying the gain
varies the degree of scattering of the pixels in the

-31-
image.
7. A method for incorporating two or more effects
into a digitized signal, the method comprising at least
two methods, each for providing a different, selected
effect, and carrying out the following additional steps:
(i) generating a conditioning signal from the
input signal;
(ii) composing an output signal by selection
from the outputs of the selected methods, in dependence
upon the conditioning signal;
wherein the methods are selected from the group
comprising:
(a) a method of adding an airbrush effect to a
digitized signal of an image, which comprises, in the
following order, the following steps:
(i) for each pixel generating first and second
random numbers corresponding to the first and second
coordinates for that pixel;
(ii) for each coordinate of each pixel, adding
the respective random number to that coordinate to produce
an output coordinate, whereby the pixels of the original
image are scattered randomly in an output image in
dependence upon the random numbers generated;
(b) a method of transforming a digitized
signal of an image to give a brush stroke effect, which
method comprises, in the following order, the following
steps:
passing the signal through a rank value filter
to filter the intensities of the pixels, to produce a rank
value filtered signal;
passing the signal through a Laplacian unit and
subsequently applying a preset gain to the signal; and
adding the rank value filtered signal from step
one to the signal produced by step two to produce an
output signal; and
(c) a method for transforming an input
digitized signal of an input image to give the appearance
of a reflective surface, which method comprises, in the

-32-
following order, the following steps:
(i) generating smoothness constants for the two
coordinates of each pixel representative of the surface
smoothness;
(ii) generating image extent constants
representative of the image extent of the pixels in the
two coordinate directions;
(iii) providing a reflected digitized signal of
an image to be reflected in the surface of the input
image;
(iv) for each coordinate of each pixel,
checking whether a first intensity, which is the intensity
of the respective pixel in the input image, is the same as
the second intensity of another pixel of the input image
spaced along the respective coordinate by the respective
coordinate smoothness constant;
(v) for each coordinate of each pixel, setting
the coordinate equal to the coordinate of the input image
when step (iv) determines that the first and second
intensities are the same, and otherwise setting the
coordinate of each pixel equal to the respective
coordinate image extent constant divided by .pi. and
multiplied by the arc tangent of the respective coordinate
smoothness constant divided by the difference between the
first intensity minus the second intensity; and
(vi) determining, for each pixel, the intensity
in a transformed output image by taking the intensity of a
corresponding pixel in the reflected digitized signal
determined by the coordinates calculated in steps (iv) and
(v).
8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein each
smoothness constant is one.
9. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the
first selected method comprises a method comprises a
method of adding an airbrush effect to a digitized signal
of an image, which comprises, in the following order, the
following steps:

-33-
(i) for each pixel generating first and second
random numbers corresponding to the first and second
coordinates for that pixel;
(ii) for each coordinate of each pixel, adding
the respective random number to that coordinate to produce
an output coordinate, whereby the pixels of the original
image are scattered randomly in an output image in
dependence upon the random numbers generated.
10. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the
second selected method comprises a method of transforming
a digitized signal of an image to give a brush stroke
effect, which method comprises, in the following order,
the following steps:
passing the signal through a rank value filter
to filter the intensities of the pixels, to produce a rank
value filtered signal;
passing the signal through a Laplacian unit and
subsequently applying a preset gain to the signal; and
adding the rank value filtered signal from step
one to the signal produced by step two to produce an
output signal.
11. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the
second selected method comprises a method for transforming
an input digitized signal of an input image to give the
appearance of a reflective surface, which method
comprises, in the following order, the following steps:
(i) generating smoothness constants for the two
coordinates of each pixel representative of the surface
smoothness;
(ii) generating image extent constants
representative of the image extent of the pixels in the
two coordinate directions;
(iii) providing a reflected digitized signal of
an image to be reflected in the surface of the input
image;
(iv) for each coordinate of each pixel,
checking whether a first intensity, which is the intensity

-34-
of the respective pixel in the input image, is the same as
the second intensity of another pixel of the input image
spaced along the respective coordinate by the respective
coordinate smoothness constant;
(v) for each coordinate of each pixel, setting
the coordinate equal to the coordinate of the input image
when step (iv) determines that the first and second
intensities are the same, and otherwise setting the
coordinate of each pixel equal to the respective
coordinate image extent constant divided by .pi. and
multiplied by the arc tangent of the respective coordinate
smoothness constant divided by the difference between the
first intensity minus the second intensity.
(vi) determining, for each pixel, the intensity
in a transformed output image by taking the intensity of a
corresponding pixel in the reflected digitized signal
determined by the coordinates calculated in steps (iv) and
(V).

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


1~34~5~:(
- 1 -
Title: APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING A
DIGITIZED SIGNAL OF AN IMAGE TO INCORPORATE
AN AIRBRUSH EFFECT
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a Divisional of Canadian
Patent Application Serial Number 612,697, Filed 22
September, 1989
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to both a method and an
apparatus for transforming pictures or images. More
particularly, it relates to a method or apparatus for
effecting a transformation of a digitized signal of an
image to achieve a painted appearance, including an
airbrush effect.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Both colour and black and white photography are
in widespread use for both still and moving pictures. In
the television field at least, numerous techniques have
been used for manipulating a television picture in various
ways, e.g. by adding or inserting a second image into a
window in a first image. However, the basic picture itself
remains essentially unchanged.
There is also a known technique of
"posterisation", which essentially reduces the image to
individual areas of solid, uniform colour, rather than
progressive changes in colour.
If one wants to achieve a hand drawn or painted
appearance, then the principal current way of achieve this
is to simply have a skilled artist draw or paint his
perception of the subject in a chosen style, using
conventional instruments such as pen, pencil and
paintbrush.
The use of an artist is acceptable in some
circumstances, and indeed it is almost certain that a
human artist can always add some effect or detail that can

1340~'~l
- 2 -
never be achieved by a machine. Nonetheless, for many
subjects, the use of an artist is either prohibitively
expensive or unnecessarily time consuming. In particular,
if one wishes to add such an effect to a television
signal, then one has the problem of applying the effect to
every frame of the signal, where there are thirty frames
per second. Clearly, for even a very short sequence, the
amount of work involved would be prohibitive.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a
technique which enables a conventional colour or black and
white image to be processed to achieve a variety of
effects, principally giving an image a hand-drawn or
painted appearance. Other more specialized effects can be
provided, for example, an image can be rendered so that it
appears to be a three-dimensional chrome surface. Ideally,
one requires a method and apparatus that enables a variety
of different techniques to be selected, manipulated and
combined with one another to achieve an almost infinite
variety of effects. It is further desirable that such an
effect should be capable of being applied relatively
quickly and economically to a digitized television or
motion picture signal, or a digitized still picture or
photograph.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
The present invention provides an apparatus and
method, capable of applying an air brush appearance to a
digitized signal of an image.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention,
there is provided an apparatus, for adding to a digitized
signal of an image an airbrush effect, the apparatus
comprising:
means for generating, for each pixel, first and
second random numbers corresponding to the first and
second coordinates for that pixel; and
summation means for adding, for each pixel, two
corresponding, random numbers to the two corresponding

- 3 -
coordinates, to produce output coordinates, whereby the
pixels of the original image are scattered randomly in an
output image in dependence upon the random numbers
generated and a rank value filter connected to the
summation means to receive the output coordinates
therefrom and for performing a rank value operation, and
having an output for a transformed image.
The present invention also encompasses a system
or apparatus for incorporating two or more effects into a
digitized signal of an image. The apparatus further
includes a conditioning unit for generating a conditioning
signal, and also an image composition unit. The image
composition unit receives the outputs from the selected
apparatus and also the output from the conditioning unit.
The composition unit then composes an output image by
selective combination of the outputs of the various
apparatus, in dependence upon the conditioning signal from
the conditioning unit.
In a preferred aspect of the present invention,
there are two selected effects or apparatus, selected from
an airbrush effect, a brush stroke effect, and the effect
of a reflective chrome surface.
The present invention also provides methods
corresponding to the apparatus.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a better understanding of the present
invention and to show more clearly how it may be carried
into effect, reference will now be made, by way of
example, to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figures 1-7 show schematically different
apparatus in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 8 shows an apparatus for combining
different effects together;
Figure 9 shows an apparatus for carrying out
the conditioning process in Figure 8; and
Figure 10 shows a schematic diagram of an
apparatus capable of carrying out a number of different
methods.
s

134~~~~
- 4 -
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Before describing the individual techniques in
detail, a description of individual elements or processes
is provided. In the following discussion, the assumption
is made that the image is a digital image. In the case of
an image which is initially in analog form, this would
need to be processed to digitize it. Further, for the
digitized image, this is considered to comprise a number
of pixels or individual points, which can be processed
individually, as is known.
The notation used to identify the individual
pixels in an image is to use an x-y coordinate system, x
being the horizontal coordinate and y the vertical
coordinate. Then, each pixel is denoted by P(x,y), where
x and y are the coordinates for that particular pixel. P
denotes the intensity of the pixel. Clearly, for each
pixel, in a colour image, there will be hue and saturation
parameters as well.
There are a number of basic processes or
transformations that can be applied to the image. Thus,
two images can be subjected to the basic arithmetic
functions of addition, subtraction, multiplication or
division, this being done on a pixel by pixel basis; eg
each pixel of one image is added, subtracted etc. to the
corresponding pixel of the second image, to produce a
corresponding pixel in the final or output image. For
example, one can simply add two images together as, by the
equation P3(x,y) - P~(x,y) + P2(x,y) for a11 x,y.
A further technique is to simply multiply the
intensity of each pixel by a constant gain, denoted G.
Again, this is presented by an equation:
P2(x,y) - GP~(x,y) for a11 x, y.
One conventional use of applying a gain to the
pixels is to compensate for an image which has a
predominance of low intensity pixels, i.e. the image has
an overall dark appearance. If one draws a histogram of
the frequency of occurrence against intensity, one gains

i340~~~.
- 5 -
an impression of the overall impression of the picture. If
a11 the pixels are clustered towards the left hand end of
the scale, i.e. indicating uniformly low intensity, then
one can apply a certain gain to a11 the pixels to expand
5 the range of intensity or grade levels to cover the entire
range. Similarly, an excessively bright image will show a
histogram with a11 the pixels clustered towards the upper
end of the grade level or intensity scale. This can simply
be modified by applying a gain which is less than unity,
10 to reduce the value of the intensity.
Image filtering is another standard technique
which is employed by the present invention in combination
with other standard techniques.
A mean filter or blur replaces the intensity of
15 each pixel by an intensity derived by averaging or taking
arithmetic mean value of the intensity of that pixel and
its neighbours. This operation is repeated for each pixel
in the image. The larger the area or number of pixels
involved in the averaging process, the greater the
20 blurring effect. This is sometimes referred to as a moving
window average, since one is effectively looking at a11
the pixels within a certain window centred on a particular
pixel.
By way of example, a 3x3 window blur would take
25 the values of nine pixels in a square and then use this
average value as the intensity for the centre pixel of
that window.
For pixels at the edge of an image, as they are
not totally surrounded by other pixels, allowance has to
30 be made for this.
There is also known in the art a large variety
of standard filters. These filters and other techniques
mentioned above have conventionally been used to enhance
pictures suffering from noise or distortion.
35 Alternatively, in the field of robotics and industrial
applications, image processing has been used with a view
to aiding machine or automatic recognition of objects

- 6 -
against a background.
In the present invention, rather than trying to
eliminate distortion or noise, the inventors have realized
that a variety of interesting and visually pleasing
effects can be achieved by, in effect, deliberately
introducing controlled distortion or noise. This gives a
desired visual effect in the final image. The invention
makes use of four different digital classes, namely:
neighbourhood operations; point transformation operations;
geometrical transformation; and colour space conversion.
A neighbourhood operation is the modification of
pixel values in a digitized image based on the value of
the pixel itself and the value of nearby pixels in a pre-
defined neighbourhood or window. By performing a
neighbourhood transformation on every pixel on an image,
one can realize a number of different image filtering
operations. Above, is given the example of simply taking
the arithmetic mean to achieve a blurring effect. This is
a particular example of a two-dimensional convolution
(sometimes referred to as a finite impulse response
filter), which simply replaces a pixel value under
consideration with a weighted average of the pixel and its
neighbours. The particular example given above took the
same value for a11 the pixels in the window or
neighbourhood, to give a low-pass filter which blurs the
image. Different weights can be given to the pixels to
achieve a high-pass filter which sharpens an image or a
band-pass filter which enhances or suppresses certain
details in an image.
It should be appreciated that, for a typical
video resolution image, there are 500 rows and 500 columns
of pixels, giving 250,000 pixels. To take a nine-point
arithmetic means for each pixel and compute in 1/30
second, this being the time for each frame, is beyond the
ability of current general purpose computers. In other
words, it is not possible to carry this out in real time
without special purpose apparatus.

1~4~~~i
An example of a Laplacian filter is given by
equation:
PZ(x.Y) - 4P~(x.Y)-P~(x-1.Y)-P~(x+1~Y)-P~(x~Y-1)-P~(x.Y+1)
for a11 x,y.
It will be seen that if a11 the pixels in the
neighbourhood have an equal value, this results in a
transformation giving a zero value. However, if an edge or
high intensity image detail is located in the centre of
the neighbourhood, the Laplacian operation will apply a
high gain to this pixel value and emphasize this detail.
The Laplacian filter overall has an effective image-
sharpening or detail enhancement effect.
In the following description of preferred
techniques, the designation "L" in a rectangle is used to
denote a Laplacian filter.
Another neighbourhood operation that is commonly
used is a rank value filter. A11 the pixels in the
selected neighbourhood are ordered or ranked from smallest
to largest in intensity. The centre pixel in the
neighbourhood is then replaced with the pixel value that
has a specified rank. A median rank filter replaces the
centre pixel with the pixel value that represents the
middle or median rank. A maximum filter replaces the
centre pixel with the maximum value in the neighbourhood,
and a minimum filter operates accordingly. The maximum and
minimum rank filters fall into a special sub-class called
morphological, which have powerful geometric properties.
A maximum filter is often referred to as a dilation
filter, as everything expands or swells; a minimum filter
is often referred to as an erosion filter, as everything
shrinks. These effects are incorporated into the methods
of the present invention to achieve a variety of effects.
An interesting property of a median filter is
that it removes or smooths details from the image that are
smaller than the filter neighbourhood extend. It has been
realized that this characteristic can be used to impart a
brush-stroke impression onto an image by effectively

i340~~1
_8_
flattening detail inside a neighbourhood. By choosing
various neighbourhood sizes and shapes, various paintbrush
sizes and shapes can be simulated.
In the following discussion of preferred
techniques or methods, the designation "RVF" is used to
denote a two-dimensional rank value filter.
Neighbourhood operations can also be used to
implement edge detectors. An edge detector is one that
outputs a high value when there is a sharp change in image
intensity and outputs a low value in areas of constant
intensity. The output of an edge detector or edge map is
useful for emphasizing or de-emphasizing the edge content
in an image. Various techniques have been used which
depend upon edge maps derived from edge detection. In
other words, the filter neighbourhood size and shape
changes based on the edge magnitude and direction. This
enables a variety of effects to be achieved, that are
totally driven by the image content.
In the following description of preferred
techniques, the designation "E" is used to indicate an
edge magnitude detector.
It will be appreciated that for a11 these
various filters and detectors, one can use a neighbourhood
of a variety of sizes and shapes. The larger the
neighbourhood, the more dramatic the change in the output
image with respect to its input. However, the larger the
neighbourhood, the greater the amount of computation that
is required for each pixel. It is now possible to obtain
ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits) from
several companies which will implement a convolution in
real time with up to an 8x8 pixel neighbourhood.
The contrast stretch outlined above is an
example of a point transformation, which involves mapping
a single pixel value to another, independently of other
pixel values. Another example of point operation is
thresholding. Here, pixels that exceed a pre-defined
intensity threshold are mapped to a particular value, and

1~4~~~1
_ g _
those that for below the threshold are mapped to another
value . This operation can effectively be used to divide an
image into two components, often to separate a foreground
object from its background. The process can be generalized
5 to multiple thresholds.
Such thresholds can be used to effect a pseudo-
colouring of the picture, which is carried out by
assigning individual colours to pre-defined intensity
ranges.
10 This point transformation operation can enhance
perception of certain details in an image. Since point
transformations amount to a simple re-mapping of a pixel
value, they can be realized with a look-up table (LUT)
operation. LUT processors operating in real time are
15 available from several companies.
Another type of image transformation is one that
re-maps the locations of pixels in an image. An example of
this would be to rotate an image through a given angle .
The present invention uses several novel geometrical image
20 manipulations which are called perturbation effects, since
location of a pixel is perturbed in some manner. By adding
random noise to each pixel, one can achieve an airbrush or
splatter paint effect, depending on the amplitude of noise
added.
25 It has further been realized that, by using
shape from shading theory, one can turn an image into a
reflective or refractive surface. In effect this technique
is used to model the image intensities as a three-
dimensional surface.
30 A final category of image manipulation that is
used by the present invention is colour space conversion.
Most colour video images reside in the RGB ( red, green,
blue) colour space, due to the limitation of phosphor
colours. However, colour image processing is most
35 conveniently carried out in the HSI (hue, saturation,
intensity) colour space where the colour of a pixel may be
decoupled from its intensity. Thus, a contrast stretch

1~4~~~~.
- 10 -
operation may be performed on the intensity component only
of an image without effecting the colour balance.
Consequently, RGB to HSI and HSI to RGB conversions are
commonly used in operations by the present invention.
5 Further, one often requires a hard copy of an image that
has been processed in the video domain. The accomplish
this, one must convert the RGB video image to the CMYR
(cyan, magenta, yellow, key) colour space, that
corresponds to available inks in the printing industry.
10 This is a non-trivial conversion if high quality results
are required.
These effects can be achieved either in a
software form or in real-time hardware. It is believed
that at the present time there is hardware available that
15 would enable circuit cards to be constructed incorporating
image processing ASICS, to effect the methods of the
present invention. These circuit cards would be controlled
from various industry standard computer buses.
Reference will now be made to the Figures which
20 show an example of the techniques and methods in
accordance with the present invention.
In a11 these examples, where reference is made
to specific kernel sizes, etc., this is to an image having
a 512x512 pixel size.
25 Figure 1 shows an apparatus for effectively
imparting a brush stroke texture to an image, the
apparatus in Figure 1 being generally denoted by the
reference 1. The apparatus 1 includes an input 2 for the
image, which is the input to a rank value filter 4.
30 The rank value filter 4 is in turn connected to
a Laplacian filter 6 and then a variable gain unit 8. The
gain unit 8 has its output connected through an addition
unit 10 to an output 12. Another input of the addition
unit 10 is taken directly from the output of the rank
35 value filter 4 through a bypass line as indicated at 14.
In use, a kernel or window size and shape is
selected for the rank value filter 4 and this determines

1~~0~5a.
- 11 -
the brush stroke size and shape. Thus, one can use a
window that is elongate to achieve a brush stroke in a
particular direction. The gain, G, set by the gain unit 8,
sets the stroke boldness. If G is set to zero, the stroke
will be muted. However as the gain G increases, the stroke
prominence increases.
By way of example, the rank value filter 4 can
have a square kernel with each dimension of the kernel
varying from 1 - 15 pixels (with a median rank value). The
gain unit 8 can provide a gain in the range 0 - 3. Zero
gain gives a muted brush stroke, whereas a gain of 3 gives
a bold brush stroke affect. The size of the kernel affects
the brush stroke size and imparted. A more particularly
preferred set of parameters would be a kernel size of 7
pixels square and a gain of 1.5.
For the rank value filter 4, a variety of kernel
shapes could be used, for example square, rectangular,
diagonal, cross and circular, depending upon the type of
brush stroke required and the direction required for the
brush stroke.
The rank value filter 4 removes or smooths
details from the image that are smaller than the filter
kernel extent, hence it is the kernel size that determines
the effective brush stroke size. This local smoothing
action tends to leave an imprint of the size and shape of
the rank value filter kernel in the ares of the image
where detail has been removed. If the kernel shape and
size are chosen such that it is the shape and size of the
desired brush stroke, the rank value filter output image
will appear to have muted brush strokes imparted on it. A
Laplacian filter is often employed to emphasize the image
detail. Here, the Laplacian filter is employed to
emphasize the boundaries of the imparted brush strokes,
and depending upon the gain used, the brush stroke can
range from muted to bold as the gain is increased.
Referring now to Figure 2, there is shown an
apparatus generally indicated by the reference 20, which

- 12 -
again has an input 22 and an output 24 which are connected
through an addition or summation unit 26. The input 22 is
additionally connected through an edge magnitude detector
unit 28 and a variable gain unit 30, whose output is
connected to another input of the addition unit 26.
Here, the gain unit 30 can be adjusted to
provide either a positive or negative sign to the gain.
The effect of the units 28, 30 is to add the detected
edges to the output image. If a positive sign is set by
the gain unit 30, then the edges will be outlined in
white, whereas if the unit 30 provides a negative sign
then the edges will be outlined in black. The intensity of
the outlining depends upon the gain set by the unit 30.
By way of example, a preferred arrangement of
this second apparatus would have an edge magnitude
detecting unit 28 which is a morphological edge detector
(as disclosed in J. Serra, "Image Analysis Mathematical
Morphology", Academic Press, New York, 1983). This edge
detector has a square kernel with each side of the kernel
having from 1 - 5 pixels, more preferably 3 pixels. The
gain unit 30 can have a gain that varies in the range of
1 - 5 and preferably a gain of 3.5. The size of the kernel
and the edge detector is directly proportional to the edge
thickness in the pixels.
Other edge detectors that could equally be used
as the edge magnitude detector number 28 are the Sobel
Edge Detector, the Compass Gradient Edge Detector, the
Laplacian Edge Detector, the Roberts Edge Detector, the
Kirsch Operator, the Difference of Gaussians Edge
Detector. It should be noted that a variety of other image
edge enhancement filters could be used.
The edge magnitude detector unit 28 creates an
image in which each pixel in image is proportional to the
magnitude of any intensity changes near that pixel. Thus,
areas where intensity changes abruptly have a high output
in the edge detection image, and areas with little change
in intensity have a low output in the edge detection

:1~40~5~.
- 13 -
image. This method strengthens the edge content of an
image by adding or subtracting edges that have first been
multiplied by a variable gain factor to or from the
original input image. Adding the gain multiplied edges
5 tends to make regions of the input image with high edge
content to appear white, while subtracting the gain
multiplied edges makes those regions appear black. Thus,
the overall effect of this technique is to make areas in
the input image with a high edge content become outlined
10 in white or black.
Figure 3 shows an apparatus generally denoted by
the reference 32 which includes an input 34 and an output
36, for the input image denoted by P~(x,y) and Pa(x,y)
respectively. The processing is indicated within the box
15 38. This is given by the following equation:
Po(x,y)=P~ (x+Gn~(x,y) , y + Gn2(x,y) ) , for all x,y
Where:
n~(x,y) and n2(x,y) are random numbers generated for each
input image pixel; and G is a constant gain value.
20 Effectively, for each pixel given by the
coordinates x,y, one generates two random numbers n~(x,y)
and n2(x,y). Each of these random numbers is multiplied by
a gain factor G and then added to the respective
coordinate x or y. Thus, each of the output coordinates
25 for x and y is the same as the input coordinate, plus the
random number multiplied by the preset gain.
The effect of this is to scatter the pixels
across the image, the degree of displacement of the pixels
from their original positions being dependent upon the
30 gain set. This gives an air brush effect with variable
coarseness, the degree of coarseness being determined by
the gain set.
A preferred random numbered generator is one
which produces random numbers with a uniform probability
35 density function in the range from 0 to 1. This is then
preferably combined with a gain of 2 to give a mild
splattering dislocation of the pixels. A gain of, for

I340551
- 14 -
example, 20 gives a very dislocated and hazy splattering
of a pixel, while gains of greater than 20 tend to produce
images that are unrecognizable.
Other probability density functions from a
random numbered generator may be used with equal success.
The texture of the dislocated pixels would change as the
density function changes. For example, a normal
probability density function with zero mean and unity
variance could be used and the result would be a somewhat
less coarse pixel dislocation for the same gain factor.
Log-normal exponential, poisson and other probability
density functions could also be used to give a good
effect.
Turning to Figure 4, there is shown an apparatus
for providing a chrome surface effect. Here, the apparatus
is generally denoted by the reference 40. Again, the
apparatus is shown as a single unit having an input 42 for
an image, P;, to be processed and a second input 44 for an
image, PR, that is to be reflected into the output image.
An output is indicated at 46. The equations indicating the
processing occurring in the apparatus 40 are as follows:
Po(x~Y) - PR(Xr~Yr) for a11 x,y
Where:
XT = x: P; ( x. Y ) -P; ( x-a. Y ) - 0
xm arctan 1 ; otherwise
n CP;(x.Y)-P;(x-a.Y)
- Y:P;(x~Y)-P;(x.Y-b) - O
y@ arctan 1 otherwise
n ~P;(x.Y)-P;(x.Y-b)
Where: a, b are constants setting the surface smoothness,
and where x~ and ym represent the maximum extent of the
digitized input images in the x and y directions
respectively, i.e. the number of pixels in the two
directions.
In effect, the process here is reflecting the
image, PR, in the input image, P;, and thus is treating the
input image as a reflective or mirrored surface. Further,

13~~ }5i.
- 15 -
the intensity of each pixel in the input image, P~ is
treated as the height above an arbitrary flat surface, so
as to give a three dimensional effect, two dimensions
being the x and y coordinates and the third dimension
5 being the pixel intensity.
Thus the method starts by converting the input
image, P~, into a three dimensional surface. It then
assumes that this is reflective and effectively takes the
reflection of the image, PR, in this reflective surface. In
10 order to be able to "see" the shape of a complex
reflective surface, one has to have some image that is
reflected in it. It is for this reason that the image PR is
provided. The image PR can be any suitable image, and can
be selected to give a desired appearance.
15 It should be appreciated that if the input
image, P~ is simply a flat surface, i.e. a conventional
plain mirror, then one would obtain a pure reflection of
the image to be reflected, PR. Where the input image P~ is
a complex shape, e.g. a person's head, then the reflective
20 surface is extremely complex and, resulting in
considerable distortion of the image to be reflected, PR,
so that this is often unrecognizable. Even if the
reflected image PR becomes totally distorted and
unrecognizable the output image still retains the shape or
25 appearance of the input image P~, but with a simulated,
reflective or chrome finish.
The equations given above effectively intend to
simulate, in a simplistic way, this process. These are
discussed below for the x coordinate, it being appreciated
30 that the y coordinate is calculated in an exactly
corresponding manner.
For the x coordinate when the condition P~ (x, y)
minus Pi (x-a,y) = 0, one has a flat reflective surface, at
least locally. Hence, a point on the image to be
35 reflected, PR is reflected back fram the flat surface to
exactly the same point. For this reason, XT is simply set
equal to x. However, where this condition is not met, i.e.

13~4~~.~
- 16 -
the surface is not locally flat, consequently, the local
surface of the image P~ will point to an alternate location
on the image to be reflected PR. The arctan function is
simply a calculation as to the point in the image PR that
5 the locally inclined surface of the image P~ indicates.
It is appreciated that these calculations are
optically simplistic, and do not take into account the
complex effects one obtains from complex curved surfaces.
Nonetheless, it has been found that the overall effect is
10 to give a very effective simulation of a chrome surface,
which produces a realistic three-dimensional effect,
representive of the original input image P~. The input
image P~ then appears to have been coated with reflective
or chrome finish.
15 Whilst a variety of different constants can be
used, it has been found that a useful range for the
smoothing constants a,b is 1-15, with a value of 1
creating a reflective surface that is most sensitive to
the undulating surfaced of P~ and the value of 15 being
20 much less sensitive than the local variations in P~.
As an example of the image that can be used for
the image to be reflected, PR, one can choose a ramp image
represented by the formula PR(x,y) = y for a11 x,y. This is
a ramp which increases from zero at y - 0 to a maximum
25 value for the maximum value y. It will be appreciated that
the ramp can be arranged to incline in any direction. In
effect, the intensity of the image to be reflected, PR,
varies as the shape given by the ramp.
The result of using such an image for the image
30 to be reflected, PR, is to give a 3-D bas relief effect of
the input image, PR. This results because when PR is chosen
as a uniformly changing ramp image, it varies from dark to
light across its surface. This models a uniformly changing
light source that is reflected into the reflective surface
35 of the input image P~, which tends to light the three
dimensional surface model of the input image in a way that
gives it a three dimensional relief image. In other words,

1~40~5.I
- 17 -
the lighting gives depth as seen by a viewer.
Referring now to Figure 5, there is shown a
fifth apparatus generally denoted by the reference 50. The
apparatus 50 has an input 52 for an input image which is
divided into two branches, one branch 53 connected
directly to a combination unit 58 and another branch 54
connected to a contrast stretch unit 56. The output of the
contrast stretch unit 56 is also connected to an input of
the combination unit 58. The combination unit 58 has an
output 59.
The unit 56 performs a contrast stretch
operation which is given by the following equation:
P2 (x,y) 0; P~(x,y) < INTENSITY 2
MAX-VAL; P~(x,y) > INTENSITY
MAX-VAL (P~(x,y) - INTENSITYZ); otherwise
INTENSITY - INTENSITY2
for a11 x, y.
and MAX-VAL is the maximum allowable pixel value in the
input image; INTENSITY, INTENSITY2 are selected image grey
levels with INTENSITY> > INTENSITY2.
The function given by the above equation
essentially sets the output, PZ (x, y), by three separate
calculations, depending upon the value of the input
signal, P~(x,y) . If P~ is less than INTENSITYZ, then the
output PZ is set to zero. If P~ is between INTENSITY2 and
INTENSITY, then P2 is determined by the equation above
which essentially gives a straight line slope from zero to
the maximum value as P~ increases from INTENSITY2 to
INTENSITY . Where P~ is greater than INTENSITY, then the
output is set to the maximum value.
The effect of this is to stretch a middle range
of grey levels, and eliminate the upper and lower grey
levels from the input signal by setting them to zero or
the maximum value respectively. If one considered a
histogram of the distribution of the pixel intensities

~340~5~.
- 18 -
against the grey level or intensity, one would find that
the middle portion of the histogram had effectively been
taken and stretched to cover the whole scale, whilst the
outer portions of the original histogram had effectively
5 moved to the very edges.
The combining function performed by the
combination unit 58 can be given by either one of the
following equations:
P3(x.Y) - P~(x.Y) + P2(x.Y) : for a11 x,y
or
P3(x.Y) - P~(x.Y) + P2(x.Y) : for a11 x.Y
2
The first of these equations is a simple
summation, and will effectively give an increase in the
overall intensity. The second of these equations
represents an averaging effect.
The overall effect of this technique is to add
highlights to an image. The values selected for INTENSITY
20 and INTENSITY2 set the highlight brightness and extent.
An alternative way of considering Figure 5 would
be to provide two variable gain units in the two branches,
and then a simple summation unit at 58. If the gains of
the two units are set equal to one another and some
25 arbitrary constant, then the two branches are effectively
added, as well as being multiplied by the arbitrary
constant. If the two gains are set equal and equal to one-
half, then one effectively obtains an average of the two
branches. Thus, by providing two gain units one obtains a
30 more general combination of the original image and the
contrast stretched image.
With regard to preferred operating parameters
for this Figure 5 embodiment, for a well exposed video
resolution image, INTENSITYz and INTENSITY could be chosen
35 as the sixtieth percentile grey level in the input image

13~~~~~-
- 19 -
and the ninety-fifth percentile grey level in the input
image respectively. This percentile selection adds
robustness to a varying lighting condition. This
effectively adds or averages the pixel intensities between
5 the sixtieth and ninety-fifth intensity percentiles to the
input image. This range of intensities between these two
percentiles is deemed to be the highlights of the input
image.
If the highlights are averaged with the input
10 image, the highlights are incorporated into the image in
the locations that they are present in the original input
image; however, in areas of image where there are no
highlights present, the addition of highlights has no
effect. Where the averaging technique is used, the areas
15 with highlights are still highlighted, but to a slightly
lesser extent, whereas the areas with no highlights are
effectively decreased in intensity. This has the effect of
making the highlights more pronounced. Averaging the
highlights into the image makes the output image appear as
20 if the highlights were added using chalk.
Referring to Figure 6, there is shown an
apparatus, intended to transform an input image into a
line drawing. The apparatus, here denoted 60, has an input
62 connected to first and second mean filters 63, 64. The
25 output of the mean filters are connected to positive and
negative inputs of a summation unit 66, which has an
output 68 forming the output of the apparatus. Here, the
first mean filter 63 has a kernel m x n, whilst the second
mean filter has a kernel a x v. The kernel of the first
30 mean filter 63 is greater than that of the second mean
filter 64 ; in other words , m is greater than a and n is
greater than v.
The output at 68 is given by the following
equation:

1~4t~~5~.
- 20 -
m/2 n/2
Po(x.Y) - ~ ~ Pi(x-i,y-J)
i=-m/2 j=-n/2
5 mn
u/2 v/2
Pi(x-k,y-1)
10 - k=-u2 1=-v/2 ; for a11 x,y
uv
The effect of this arrangement is, for each
pixel, to first take a mean within a first kernel of a11
the pixels in that kernel, and then subtract a mean signal
15 derived from the second, smaller kernel, to arrive at an
output signal.
Each mean filter 63, 64, performs a low-pass
function. The cut-oft frequency of each mean filter is
determined by the size of the kernel, so that the filter
20 with a smaller kernel has a higher cut off frequency. By
subtracting the output of one filter from the other, one
obtains a band-pass filter. Normally, edge information
occupies the higher frequency regions of an image, i.e.
sharp transitions. However, image noise also tends to
25 reside at the higher frequencies. Thus, if one uses a
band-pass filter, one can pass some of the high
frequencies through to extract the image edges for forming
a line drawing, but simultaneously attenuate the highest
frequencies that contain noise and make for a dirtier or
30 noisier line drawing image.
Here, it will be appreciated that, because of
the relative sizes of the two kernels, one is in fact
subtracting the output from the mean filter with the
higher cut-off frequency, namely filter 64 from the output
35 of the other mean filter with the lower cut-off frequency,
namely, filter 63. In effect, this gives a negative band

-- 1340~~~
- 21 -
pass filter operation.
The result is that the small features in an
image, normally associated with higher frequencies, such
as a human tooth or iris of the pupil are outlined; a
conventional band-pass filter would cause them to appear
to be filled in. Here, it is to be noted that if the
negative band-pass filter gives an output indicating a
negative value for the intensity then this is treated as
zero.
It has been found that useful ranges for the
sizes of the two kernels are the range 1 - 13 for the
parameters u, v and the range 3 - 15 for the parameters m,
n. The more particularly preferred values are for a and v
to be both equal to 7 and m arid n to be both equal to 11.
Figure 7 shows an apparatus for modifying an
image so that it appears to be painted in a water colour
style. In particular, rounded blobby features reminiscent
of, or simulating, paint dabs are added to the image.
The apparatus 70 of Figure 7 has an input 72
connected to an input of a first rank value filter 74,
which in turn has an output connected to a second rank
value filter 76.
The output of the second rank value filter 76 is
connected, as in the first arrangement of Figure 1,
through a Laplacian unit 78 and a gain unit 80 to a
summation unit 82. There is also a bypass line 84
providing a direct connection from the output of the
filter 76 to the summation unit 82. The summation unit 82
sums its two inputs and forms an output 86.
The two rank value filters 74, 76 have identical
kernel size and shape, but the rank value for each filter
is chosen differently, in accordance with the following
method.
Let a rank value of 1 with respect to a kernel
correspond to the minimum pixel value in the kernel and a
rank value of N correspond to the maximum pixel values in
the kernel. Choose a value of p such that:

13~OW1
- 22 -
1 <_ p <_ N
Then the rank for the filters 74, 76 are
selected as:
RVF Filter 74: p
RVF Filter 76: (N + 1) - p
Thus in effect, p is chosen arbitrarily and the
sum of the two ranks for the two rank value filters is
equal to the sum of the maximum and minimum rank value in
the kernel. When p is halfway between one and N, then the
rank for each filter will be similar. The bright areas of
the image do not then move relative to the dark areas of
the image. However, as p is decreased toward one, then the
first rank value filter will have the low rank p, whilst
the second rank value filter 76 will have a relatively
high rank. This has the effect of the dark areas of the
image expanding more into the light regions.
Correspondingly, as p is increased towards N, the light
regions of the image expand more into the dark regions.
The combination of the two rank value filters
produces the rounded blobby areas. The units 78-84
accentuates the paint dabs. A low gain, e.g. close to
zero, produces a muted blob, whilst a higher gain produces
a stronger dab. It is to be noted that components 78-84
correspond to the arrangement shown in Figure 1.
It is to be noted that if p = 1, then the first
rank value filter 74 is a local minimum filter or
morphological erosion operator, i.e. it causes bright
areas of the image to contract and dark areas to expand,
and the second rank value filter 76 is then a local
maximum filter or dilation operator, i.e. bright areas of
the image expand while dark areas contract. The
combination of the two filters operating as erosion and
dilation operators performs an operation referred to as a
morphological opening. The net effect of an opening is
that local peaks in the image smaller than the kernel
extent are smoothed from the image and the dark areas of
the image seep into the bright areas, since the dilation

~340~r~~~
- 23 -
does not quite counter-act the initial erosion. The
combination of this local peak smoothing and dark regions
swelling produces round blobby areas in the image
reminiscent of water colour paint dabs.
Correspondingly, if p = N, the roles of the two
rank value filters are reversed. The first rank value
filter 74 becomes a maximum filter, whilst the second rank
value filter 76 becomes a local minimum filter. The
combination of the two filters working in series then
performs a morphological closing. The net effect of such
a closing is the local valleys in the image, i.e. dark
areas which are smaller than the kernel extent, are filled
in and the bright areas of the image seep into the dark
areas. Here, the erosion does not quite counteract the
initial dilation. Again, in the combination of valley
filling and light region swelling produces blobby areas
reminiscent of water colour dabs.
If p is adjusted to be in the mid-point between
1 and N, there is less movement of the dark regions into
the light and vice versa. As well, the overall effect of
the blob area creation diminishes as p approaches the mid-
point, since full erosions and dilations are no longer
being performed. The two rank value filters become median
filters that preserve intensity boundary locations, thus,
when p is located in the mid-point of the range, the water
colour effect becomes more subtle.
The role of the Laplacian filter 78 and gain
unit 80 is to strengthen the paint dab boundaries. The
higher the gain the more pronounced the boundary.
The preferred parameters for this method are:
p = 20
N = 25
G = 1.0
However, useful ranges for these parameters are:
1 <_ p <_ N/5
or (N-N/5) <_ p <_ N
N in the range 9 - 121

1'~40~51
- 24 -
G in the range 0 - 3
Turning to Figure 8, there is shown a method and
apparatus for combining different effects together. Here,
the apparatus 90 has an input 92 connected to first and
second processes indicated at 94, 96 and to a conditioning
unit 78. The outputs of these three units 94, 96 and 98
are connected to an image composition unit 100 which
produces an output 102.
The processes 94, 96 can be any one of the
processes in accordance with the present invention, e.g.
those described in relation to the preceding figures. This
apparatus enables them to be combined in a variety of
ways. The conditioning unit 98 provides a switching
function to combine the two modified images produced from
the processes 94, 96 as desired.
The conditioning unit 98 can produce the
following function at the output 102:
D(x,y) - C(x,y)A(x,y)) + (MAX VAL - C(x,y))B(x,y)
MAX VAL
Where:
MAX VAL is the maximum allowable pixel intensity
value.
In effect, this function provides that the
respective weights given to the two processes A, B,
depends upon the intensity of the conditioning signal, C,
for that particular pixel.
It is expected that useful conditioning
functions for the conditioning unit 98 are: no
conditioning performed; edge magnitude detection; and
contrast stretching. Other conditioning techniques are
possible. Thus, one can detect different areas of an image
in relation to colour and/or intensity or other factors.
Then, these different areas can be subjected to different
processes. Also, whilst just two processes 94, 96 are
shown, it will be realized that this basic arrangement can
..

M ~.3~4~~~.
- 25 -
be generalized to any number of processes.
Another possibility is to combine images
dependent upon the brightness, i.e. in the bright areas
one processing technique is used, whereas in the dark
areas another technique is used. In this case, the input
image itself may serve as the switching function. However,
one may wish to condition the input image in some way to
change the reaction of the switching function. For
instance, an edge magnitude detector could be employed to
create image C. This has the effect of having image A
dominate the output image and areas of high edge intensity
and image B in regions of low edge intensity.
Alternatively, the input image could have its intensity
profile modified in some way such as a contrast stretch in
order to modify the switching function.
Referring now to Figure 9, there is shown an
example of one conditioning process that could be used.
Here, the conditioning unit 98 has an input 104 which is
connected to the inputs of a rank value filter 106 and a
mean filter 108. The outputs of these two filters 106, 108
are connected to a combination unit 110 which has positive
and negative inputs for the two filters, 106, 108
respectively. The output of the unit 110 is connected to
the threshold unit 112, and in turn to an output 114.
The rank value filter 106 has a rank value of
25, i.e. a median value. The thresholding unit 112
provides thresholding process where every pixel intensity
greater than the threshold t is mapped to MAX VAL. Any
pixel having an intensity less than t is mapped to zero.
Here, t is set equal to 1.
With this conditioning process, the output of
114 will be set equal to MAX VAL, where the local median
value is greater than or equal to the local mean value. On
the other hand, where the median value is less than the
mean value, the output 114 will be zero.
Using the equation for the output D(x,y), for
Figure 8, then the output will be process 1, where the

- 26 -
local median value is greater than or equal to the local
mean value. On the other hand, where the median value is
less than the mean value, then process 2 will be passed
through to the output.
The effect of this switching function is to
produce a strong painted effect.
The two filters 106, 108 preferably have a
kernel size of 7 x 7.
Reference will now be made to Figure 10, which
shows a block diagram for a real-time digital video effect
process, indicated by the reference 120. The process of
120 has an analog to digital converter 122 with an input
for a video signal. This produces two outputs, 123, 124
for the RGB and HSI colour spaces.
A switch 126 enables either or both of these
outputs 123, 124 to be connected through to two separate
branches 128 and 130.
In the first branch 128, there is an rank value
filter 132, connected to a convolution filter 134, and
then in turn to a lookup table 136.
In the second branch 130, there is an edge
detection unit 138, another lookup table 140 and an
arithmetic logic unit 142.
As indicated at 144 the various components 132
142 would be mounted in a common housing and connected, as
indicated by terminals 146, to one or more digital
crosspoint switches. These digital crosspoint switches
would enable the components 132-142 to be connected in a
variety of patterns. The input switch 126 and output 148
are similarly provided with terminals 146 to enable them
to be connected by the digital crosspoint switches.
In Figure 10, arrows 150 indicate,
schematically, the digital crosspoint switch or switches
and their effective connections.
It will be appreciated that a variety of
different functional units could be provided, as shown
elsewhere in the drawings, and these could be combined in
various ways. Such functional units include: variable
gain units; Laplacian units; random number generators;

1340~~~.
- 27 -
constrast stretch units; and mean filters.
Thus, here the input signal passes through the
first branch 128 where the signal is given a brush stroke
effect by the rank value filter 132 and then sharpened in
the convolution filter 138 prior to a contrast stretch
operation by the lookup table 136. Simultaneously, in the
other branch, the convolution filter 138 detects edges,
and the magnitude of the edges and then normalized by the
lookup table 140.
The arithmetical logic unit 142 subtracts the
output of the two lookup tables 136, 140, so as to
subtract the normalized edges from the image from the
first branch 128. The edges in the resulting image will
now have dark outline highlights.
The output 148 is then connected by a switch
152 to the RGB or HSI input of a digital to analog
converter 154, and then to a final output 156.
;~h~

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1340551 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2010-05-18
Letter Sent 2009-11-25
Letter Sent 2009-11-25
Letter Sent 2009-05-19
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2000-03-29
Inactive: Divisional record deleted 2000-03-27
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1999-07-27
Inactive: CPC assigned 1999-07-27
Inactive: Cover page published 1999-06-02
Inactive: Inventor deleted 1999-05-21
Grant by Issuance 1999-05-18
Application Received - Divisional 1994-02-22

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (category 1, 2nd anniv.) - standard 2001-05-18 2001-05-03
MF (category 1, 3rd anniv.) - standard 2002-05-20 2002-05-02
MF (category 1, 4th anniv.) - standard 2003-05-20 2003-05-02
MF (category 1, 5th anniv.) - standard 2004-05-18 2004-05-04
MF (category 1, 6th anniv.) - standard 2005-05-18 2005-05-04
MF (category 1, 7th anniv.) - standard 2006-05-18 2006-05-01
MF (category 1, 8th anniv.) - standard 2007-05-18 2007-04-30
MF (category 1, 9th anniv.) - standard 2008-05-20 2008-04-30
Registration of a document 2008-10-16
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
IMAGEWARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPEMENT INC.
AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Past Owners on Record
IAN JAFFRAY
JOHN F. BRONSKILL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1999-06-02 7 323
Cover Page 1999-06-02 1 17
Drawings 1999-06-02 5 72
Abstract 1999-06-02 1 22
Descriptions 1999-06-02 27 1,264
Maintenance Fee Notice 2009-06-30 1 171
Maintenance Fee Notice 2009-06-30 1 171
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2009-11-20 1 101
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2009-11-20 1 101
Examiner Requisition 1994-07-07 1 55
Examiner Requisition 1997-08-15 2 37
Prosecution correspondence 1994-07-28 2 59
Prosecution correspondence 1998-02-16 2 93
Examiner Requisition 1998-08-04 2 39
Prosecution correspondence 1998-11-04 2 119
PCT Correspondence 1999-03-11 1 49