Language selection

Search

Patent 2009830 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2009830
(54) English Title: LUBRICATING BASE OILS
(54) French Title: HUILES BASIQUES DE LUBRIFICATION
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10G 69/08 (2006.01)
  • C10G 45/68 (2006.01)
  • C10G 65/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BEAL, FRANCOIS (France)
  • MISSIAEN, ROLAND (France)
  • MARSEU, ROBERTE (France)
  • CABIN, PHILIPPE (France)
(73) Owners :
  • SHELL CANADA LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • SHELL CANADA LIMITED (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1990-02-12
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1990-08-14
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
8901874 (France) 1989-02-14

Abstracts

English Abstract


T 5934
A B S T R A C T
IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO LUBRICATING BASE OILS
Lubricating base oils of enhanced aromaticity and high
viscosity index are manufactured by dehydrogenation of a high
viscosity index base oil over a suitable catalyst and, optionally,
subsequent hydrotreating of the dehydrogenated product.
D05/T5934FF


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 8 -
T 5934
C L A I M S
1. A process for the manufacture of a lubricating base oil of
enhanced aromaticity comprising contacting a lubricating base oil
feedstock having a high viscosity index with a dehydrogenating
catalyst and recovering a product having enhanced aromaticity
therefrom.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the aromaticity is
increased by an amount of at least 3 mmol/100 g.
3. A process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the viscosity
index of the feedstock is at least 135.
4. A process according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the
dehydrogenating catalyst comprises a Group VIII noble metal
component, a Group IVA metal component and a refractory oxide
support, preferably platinum, tin and an alumina support.
5. A process according to any one of the preceding claims,
wherein the reaction temperature is from 300 to 600 °C and the
hydrogen partial pressure is from 1 to 30 bar.
6. A process according to any one of the preceding claims,
wherein at least a portion of the product of enhanced aromaticity
is subjected to hydrotreating in the presence of hydrogen and a
suitable catalyst and a hydrotreated product is recovered
therefrom, preferably using a hydrotreating catalyst which
comprises nickel and/or cobalt and molybdenum and/or tungsten,
especially a hydrotreating catalyst which further comprises
phosphorus.
7. A process accordlng to claim 6, wherein the hydrotreating is
carried out at a temperature of 100 to 400°C and a hydrogen
partial pressure of 20 to lS0 bar.
8. A lubricating base oil having a viscosity index of at least
135 and an aromatic content of at least 3 mmol/100 g.
9. A lubricating base oil according to claim 8 having an aromatic
content of at least 10 mmol/100 g.

- 9 -
10, A lubricating base oil according to claim 8 or 9 containing
olefinic unsaturation.
11. A lubricating base oil according to claim 8 or 9 from which
the olefinic unsaturation has been substantially removed.
12. A lubricating base oil when prepared by the process of any one
of the preceding claims 1 to 7.
D05/T5934FF

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 1 Z009830
T 5934
IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO LUBRICATING BASE OILS
This invention relates to lubricat$ng base oils and is
particularly concerned with a process for the manufacture of such
base oils with a high viscosity index and to lubricating base oils
which can be obtained by that process.
Lubricating base oils are derived from various mineral crude
oils by a variety of refining processes, generally directed to
obtaining a lubricating base oil with a suitable viscosity index
for the intended end use.
The preparation of high viscosity index lubricating base oils
can be carried out as follows. A crude oil is separated by
distillation at atmospheric pressure into a number of distillate
fractions and a residue, known as long residue. The long residue is
than separated by distillation at reduced pressure into a number of
vacuum distillates and a vacuum residue known as short residue.
From the vacuum distillate fractions lubricating base oils are
prepared by refining processes which include wax removal from the
vacuum distillate fractions. From the short residue asphalt can be
removed by known deasphalting processes to give a deasphalted oil
from which wax can subsequently be removed to yield a residual
lubricating base oil, known as bright stock. The wax obtained
during refining of the various lubricating base oil fractions is
designated as slack wax.
Such slack waxes can be catalytically hydrotreated to yield
high viscosity index lubricating base oils uslng processes such as
those described in GB 1j429,494 and European patent applicaeion
No. 324 528.
The high viscosity index base oils obtained by such processes
have excellent characteristics in many respects, especially as they
~ obviate the need for the addition of polymeric viscosity index
!~ 30 improvers. However, as a result of the processing involved in their
, manufacture, they have a low aromaticity when compared with
.~
.
` ' `

200~
- 2 -
lubricating base olls of lower viscosity index. Thus they have a
reduced ability to solubilize other materials, for example
materials resulting from oxidation reactions which occur in the
commercial lubricants prepared therefrom.
The present invention is directed to the preparation of novel
lubricating base oils having a high viscosity index together with
comparatively high aromaticity. Surprisingly it has been found that
such aromatics-containing base oils can be obtained by
dehydrogenating and selectively rehydrogenating a high viscosity
index lubricating base oil while still maintaining the desired high
viscosity index.
Accordingly, one aspect of the present invention provides a
novel process for introducing aromaticity to a lubricating base oil
comprising contacting a lubricating base oil feedstock having a
high viscosity index with a dehydrogenating catalyst and recovering
a product having enhanced aromaticity therefrom. By high viscosity
index is understood a viscosity index of at least 125 as determined
by ASTM D-567. The feedstock preferably has an extra high viscosity
index of at least 135.
At least a portion of the product having enhanced aromaticity
may be subjected, in accordance with a further aspect of the
present invention, immediately downstream of the dehydrogenation or
after further processing and/or transportation, to hydrotreating in
the presence of hydrogen and a suitable catalyst and recavering a
hydrotreated product therefrom.
It has also surprisingly been found that the hydrotreating
does not substantially decrease the aromaticity, so that there is
obtained a product of increased aromaticity from which olefinic
unsaturation has substantially been removed by the hydrotreatment.
Furthermore, the product has been found to maintaln a high
viscosity index, together with an increased aromatic content.
Suitably, the aromatic content i9 increased by contact with the
dehydrogenating catalyst by an amount of at least 3 mmol/100 g.
Therefore, in accordance with a still further aspect of the
invention, there are provided, as novel products, lubricating base

200983~)
- 3 -
oils having an extra high viscosity index of at least 135 and an
aromatic content of at least 3 mmol/100 g. These base oils may be
the direct products of the dehydrogenation, containing some
olefinic unsaturation, or the products of the subsequent
hydrotreatment to give base oils from which the olefinic
unsaturation has substantially been re~oved.
The lubricating base oil feedstock having a high viscosity
index may be obtained for example by the processes described in
GB 1,429,494 and EP 324 528. The viscosity index as determined by
ASTM D-567 is at least 125 and is preferably at least 135, more
preferably above 140. The base oils suitably also have a low pour
point below -10 C (as determined by ASTM D-27).
The dehydrogenating catalyst employed to introduce aromaticity
to the lubricating base oil is preferably a cGmposite catalyst
comprising a Group VIII noble metal component, a Group IVA metal
component and a refractory oxide support. The Group VIII noble
metal component is preferably platinum and is preferably present in
an amount of 0.1 to 1 ~wt, preferably 0.3 to 0.5 ~wt. The Group IVA
metal component is preferably tin and is preferably present in an
amount of 0.1 to 1 ~wt, preferably 0.3 to 0.5 ~wt. The refractory
oxide support is preferably alumina but may also be materials such
as silica, silica-alumina, magnesia, zirconia, titania or mixtures
thereof.
It is possible, though not essential, to neutralize the
catalyst support, for example with an alkali metal or alkaline
earth metal component, preferably lithium, or, alternatively
potassium. Suitable catalysts are described, for example, in US
Patent No. 4,672,146.
The dehydrogenation reaction is normally carried out at a
relatively high temperature and moderate pressure. Suitable
temperatures are in the range of 300 C to 600 C, preferably from
400 to 500 C, with a hydrogen partial pressure of l to 30 bar,
preferably from 5 to 15 bar. Suitable sp~ce velocities range from
0.2 to 20, preferably from 2 to 10 kg/l catalyst.h. A suitable

2~983n
- 4 -
gas/feedstock ratio ranges from 200 to 2500 Nl/kg, preferably from
500 to 1200 Nl/kg.
The product having increased aromaticity may be subjected to
subsequent hydrotreating immediately downstream of the
dehydrogenation and with or without removal of, for example,
gaseous products. Alternatively the product may be sub~ected to
further processing, such as deep dewaxing, solvent extraction
and/or transportation to a separate station for subsequent
hydrotreatment.
The catalyst used in the hydrotreatment contains at least one
hydrogenating metal component. The metal component is suitably
selected from the Groups VIB and/or VIII of the Periodic Tab}e of
the Elements. These Groups include the noble metals platinum and
palladium. It is however preferred to use nickel and/or cobalt, and
molybdenum and/or tungsten compounds.
The amount of nickel and/or cobalt present in the catalyst can
sultably vary between 1 and 20a by weight, calculated as metal on
total catalyst, preference being given to amounts in the range of
1.5 to 12% by weight. The amounts of molybdenum and/or tungsten may
advantageously vary between 5 and 40~ by weight, calculated as
metal on total catalyst, preference being given to amounts in the
range of 8 to 30~ by weight.
The metal components may be incorporated on a support by any
conventional technique, such as impregnation, dry-impregnation,
precipitation or a combination thereof. Any suitable support
material may be used, such as the refractory oxides silica,
alumina, silica-alumina, magnesia, zirconia, titania or mixtures
thereof. Silica, silica-alumina and alumina are preferred support
materials, in particular alumina. Natural and synthetic crystalline
aluminosilicates can also be used, such as fau~asite-type zeolites,
in particular zeolite Y, mordenite-type zeolites and ZSN-5 type
zeolites, or mixtures containing such a zeolite.
The catalysts are normally sulphided and may be fluorided by
techniques known in the art. The catalyst preferably further
comprises phosphorus, advantageously in an amount of from 0.5 to

2~ 83~) ~
- 5 -
12% by weight calculated as elemental phosphorus, based on total
catalyst.
The hydrotreating reaction is suitably carried out under
comparatively mild conditions. Suitable temperatures are in the
range of 100-400 C, preferably from 200-300 C with a hydrogen
partial pressure in the range of 20 to~l50 bar, preferably from 40
to 60 bar. Suitable space velocities range from 0.1 to 5 kg/l
catalyst.h, preferably from 0.5 to 2 kg/l catalyst.h, while a
suitable gas/feedstock ratio ranges from 200 to 2000 Nl/kg,
preferably from 400 to 1000 Nl/kg.
The invention will now be illustrated by means of the
following examples.
EXANPLE 1
A high viscosity index lubricating base oil was used as
feedstock. This oil had the following characteristics:
kinematic viscosity at 100 C (Vk 100) 5.39 mm2/s
pour point -18 C
viscosity index 144.4
aromatics content (mmol/100 g) mono 0.388
di 0.010
poly 0.017
bromine index (mg/100 g) lO
The feedstock was used for a series of dehydrogenation
experiments in an automated one-reactor trickle-flow unit under gas
once-through mode of operation and using temperatures as given in
Table 1, a hydrogen pressure of 10 bar, a gas/feedstock ratio of
700 Nl/kg, and a space velocity of 4 kg/l.h. The catalyst employed
was a platinum/tin catalyst on a lithlum-neutralized alumina
support and contained 0.40 ~wt platinum and 0.41 ~wt tin, with an
initial pore volume of 0.93 cm3/g and an initial surface area of
131 m /g. Aromatics content was determined by W absorption.
The results of the experiments are given in Table l.
':
.

Z009~330
- 6 -
TABLE 1
Experiment No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Average Temp. 440 460 400 430 450 470
Yield, ~wt on feedstock
< 370 C 9.110.1 1.4 7.1 8.2 11.8
> 370 C 90.989.9 98.692.9 91.8 88.2
Oil Properties
Vk 100 mm2/s 4.724.71 5.334.93 4.82 4.68
VI 143.5 142.7145.5144.4 142.8 141.3
pour point C -15 -15 -18
Aromatics, mmol/100 g
mono 27.10 31.653.0310.75 18.69 25.70
di 1.031.29 0.0670.3980.737 1.11
poly 0.605 0.8740.0730.230 0.413 0.752
It will be seen from the above results that aromaticity has
been introduced to the lubricating base oil while maintaining a
high viscosity index over a range of operating temperatures. The
products were found to have a content of olefinic unsaturation (by
determination of the bromine number in accordance with ASTM
D-1159-82) of from 1 to 6.
EXAMPLE 2
A high viscosity index, high aromatics lubricating base oil
obtained as described in Example 1 and having the propertles given
in Table 2 below was hydrotreated in a one-reactor micro-flow unit
under gas once-through mode of operation. The conditions of
operation were a temperature of 260 C, a hydrogen pressure of
50 bar, a gas/feedstock ratio of 500 Nl/kg and a space velocity of
1 kg/l.h. The catalyst employed was a hydrotreating catalyst
comprising 2.5~ by weight of nickel, 13.5~ by weigh~ of molybdenum
.' , '

- 7 - ~ ~ a 3
and 2.9~ by weight of phosphorus on alumina, the percentages being
based on total catalyst. Aromatics content was determined by W
absorption.
The results are given in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Feed Product
Oil Properties
Vk 100 mm /s 4.718 4.746
VI 143.5 143
pour point C -15 -12
Aromatics, mmol/100 g
mono 28.4 23.3
di 1.2
poly 0.62 0.14
Bromine number (mg/100 g) 4
The yield of > 370 C, ~wt on feedstock, was 99~.
It will be seen from the above results that hydrotreatment of
the aromat~zed lubricating base oil has given a product in which
the aromaticity and the viscosity index have not been adversely
affected. The product was found to have a low content of olefinic
unsaturation by determination of the bromine index (ASTN D-1491-78
which was found to be 20 mg/100 g.
;
.' ~ ' ` ' ~,
.
'

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2009830 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1997-02-12
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 1997-02-12
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1995-08-12
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1995-08-12
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1995-02-13
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1995-02-13
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1990-08-14

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1995-02-13
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SHELL CANADA LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
FRANCOIS BEAL
PHILIPPE CABIN
ROBERTE MARSEU
ROLAND MISSIAEN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1990-08-13 1 11
Claims 1990-08-13 2 42
Drawings 1990-08-13 1 5
Descriptions 1990-08-13 7 228
Fees 1993-01-17 1 47
Fees 1994-01-05 1 49
Fees 1992-01-12 1 34