Language selection

Search

Patent 2010763 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2010763
(54) English Title: DIGITAL SIGNAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE TRANSMISSION DE SIGNAUX NUMERIQUES
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H04K 1/00 (2006.01)
  • H04L 25/03 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WELLHAUSEN, HANS-WERNER (Germany)
  • GRAF, KLAUS-PETER (Germany)
  • HUBER, JOHANNES (Germany)
  • TRONDLE, KARLHEINZ (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • KE KOMMUNIKATIONS-ELEKTRONIK G.M.B.H. & CO.
(71) Applicants :
  • KE KOMMUNIKATIONS-ELEKTRONIK G.M.B.H. & CO. (Germany)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1990-02-23
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1990-08-24
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 39 05 695.3 (Germany) 1989-02-24

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
The invention relates to a digital transmission
system for the simultaneous transmission of several
binary digital signals via separate wire pairs in a
single cable. In addition to a threshold-value
detector, an interference-value predictor is used. The
scanning values of the latter are derived from a
difference signal between a Nyquist-equalized signal
and a detected signal. The interference protection
against crosstalk is considerably increased in this
way.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A system for the simultaneous transmission of
several binary digital signals via separate wire pairs,
located in a multi-pair cable, in which the binary,
scrambled digital signals are re-coded into quaternary
signals and the bi-directional signal transmissions,
independently of each other, are carried in the same
low-frequency cable, the received signals are Nyquist-
distorted, the low-frequency signal portions lost on
the transmission path are recovered by means of a
quantized feedback (QR) and the resulting signal is
threshold-detected and the predominant part of the
receiver is realized by means of methods known from
digital signal processing in order to obtain the
maximum possible interference protection according to
theory against crosstalk interferences, characterized
by the fact that, in addition to the conventional
threshold-value detector (SD), known in itself, an
interference-value predictor (1) with the coefficients
P1 through PN is used, whose scanning values (ri) are
derived from the difference signal (ri) between the
Nyquist-distorted signal (ki-1) and the detected signal
(vi), so that uncorrelated interference values, which
-16-

are effectively reduced for the detection process,,are
formed from the original colored interference value.
2. A digital transmission system according to
claim 1, having a receiver structure comprising:
a high-pass filter (HP);
a linear equalizer (2) with the coefficients
co through cL;
decision-feedback equalizer (3) with the
coefficients bo through bM: and
only one interference-value predictor (1) for
digital signals with more than three amplitude stages.
3. A digital transmission system according to
claim 2, wherein the linear and decision-feedback
equalizers and the interference-value predictor utilize
different coefficient setting algorithms with different
setting speeds.
4. A digital transmission system according to
claim 3, wherein the zero-forcing algorithm is used for
the equalizers and the minimum-mean-square algorithm is
used for the interference-value predictor, so that low-
frequency unsteady impulsive interferences are
suppressed, without cancelling the effect of the high-
-17-

pass filtering upon the unsteady impulsive
interference.
5. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 2, wherein only the signs of the
values that are used for adaptive filter coefficient
settings are used by application of the sign algorithm.
6. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 2, wherein the linear equalizer
comprises:
an analog compromise equalizer (KE), with a
fixed setting; and
an adjustable, digital equalizer (DE)
connected to an output of the compromise equalizer,
whereby the number of coefficients required (co - cL
and bo - bM) for the linear equalizer (2) and the
decision-feedback equalizer (2) are reduced and an
information-loss-free transition from a continuous-time
digital siignal (e(t)) to a discrete-time signal (ei) is
realized.
-18-

7. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 2, wherein the detection time is
established on the basis of the coefficients (cO
through cL) of the linear equalizer.
8. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 1, wherein only the signs of the
values that are used for adaptive filter coefficient
settings are used by application of the sign algorithm.
9. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 1, wherein the system is used for
the transmission of 2.048 Mbit/s to local subscriber
lines, to increase the field length, with simultaneous
occupancy of the cables with systems of the same kind.
10. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 9, wherein all wire pairs in a
bundle cable with spiral quads can be used when each
spiral quad is used for the transmission of signals in
one direction only.
11. A system for the simultaneous bi-directional
transmission of several binary digital signals via
separate wire pairs, located in a multi-pair cable, in
-19-

which the signals are re-coded into quaternary signals,
said system including a receiver, comprising:
means for providing quantized feedback of a
received signal;
a threshold-value detector for detecting, the
received signal that is subject to quantized feedback;
and
an interference-value predictor with the
coefficients P1 through PN, whose scanning values are
derived from a difference signal between a Nyquist-
distorted signal and the detected signal, so that
uncorrelated interference values, which are effectively
reduced for the detection process, are formed from an
original colored interference value.
12. A digital transmission system according to
claim 11, having a receiver structure comprising:
a high-pass filter (HP):
a linear equalizer (2) with the coefficients
cO through cL;
decision-feedback equalizer (3) with the
coefficients bo through bM; and
only one interference-value predictor (1) for
digital signals with more than three amplitude stages.
-20-

13. A digital transmission system according to
claim 12, wherein the linear and decision-feedback
equalizers and the interference-value predictor utilize
different coefficient setting algorithms with different
setting speeds.
14. A digital transmission system according to
claim 13, wherein the zero-forcing algorithm is used
for the equalizers and the minimum-mean-square
algorithm is used for the interference-value predictor,
so that low-frequency unsteady impulsive interferences
are suppressed, without cancelling the effect of the
high-pass filtering upon the unsteady impulsive
interference.
15. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 12, wherein only the signs of the
value that are used for adaptive filter coefficient
settings are used by application of the sign algorithm.
16. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 12, wherein the linear equalizer
comprises:
an analog compromise equalizer (KE), with a
fixed setting; and
-21-

an adjustable, digital equalizer (DE)
connected to an output of the compromise equalizer,
whereby the number of coefficients required (cO - cL
and bo - bM) for the linear equalizer (2) and the
decision-feedback equalizer (2) are reduced and an
information-loss-free transition from a continuous-time
digital signal (e(t)) to a discrete-time signal (ei) is
realized.
17. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 12, wherein the detection time is
established on the basis of the coefficients (cO
through cL) of the linear equalizer.
18. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 11, wherein only the signs of the
values that are used for adaptive filter coefficient
settings are used by application of the sign algorithm.
19. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 11, wherein the system is used for
the transmission of 2.048 Mbit/s to local subscriber
lines, to increase the field length, with simultaneous
occupancy of the cables with systems of the same kind.
-22-

20. A digital signal transmission system
according to claim 19, wherein all wire pairs in a
bundle cable with spiral quads can be used when each
spiral quad is used for the transmission of signals in
one direction only.
-23-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


20~(~763
DIGITAL SIGNA~ TRANSNISSION SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a digital signal
transmission system for the simultaneous transmission
of several signals via separate wire pairs in a multi-
pair cable.
Description of the Prior Art
Digital transmission systems with maximal bit
rates of 2.048 Mbit/s for the multiple use of multi-
pair symmetrical low-frequency cables are known. AMI-
coded or HDB3-coded line ~ignal~ are predominantly
transmltted via the Nyquist-equalized channel of the
wire pair and are threshold detected. These
conventionàl procedures are ~ery ~ensitive to cro~stalk
interferences from similar transmission systems which
operate on adjacent pairs in the same cabIe. This
I,
¦ problem is partlcularly acute when bidirectional
signals, independent of each other, are transmitted in
the same cable. The proceduxes are also sensitive to
impulsive interferences caused by the character
transmission of electro-mechanical switched systems.
`~

20~0763
These interferences limit the maximum field length or
regeneration space that may be bridged and also, in the
case of a fixed field length, limit the number of
transmission systems of the same kind that can be
located in the same cable.
The main source of interference is crosstalk,
which is caused by signals of systems of the same kind
which operate on ad;oining pairs within the same
cable. Therefore, a greater field length cannot be
achieved by increasing the transmitter power, but only
by an improved system design. Further interference is
i caused by the crosstalk of rare pulses with high' energy, which originate from asymmetrical signaling
r~ procedures on pairs that are still used for traditional
analog voice transmis6ion. The spectral energy density
of such pulses is concentrated at frequencies which are
low compared to the data rate. The transmitted pulses
are stretched over many symbol lntervals T by the
di~perslve medium, resulting in a strong attenuation at
hlgh frequencies.
An optimum solution to the detection of a digital
signal with severe inter-symbol interference and
,~, ,
colored noise is achieved by using a Maximum-Likelihood-
Sequence-Estimation using the Viterbi-algorithm, as
explained by G. S. Forney, Jr., "Maximum-Likelihood-
-2-
. ~
'., - : ' t
' , . :,

2010763
Sequence-Estimation (MLSE) of Di~ital Sequences in the
Presence of Inter-Symbol Interference", IEEE Trans.
Information Theory, Vol. IT-18, pp. 363-378, May 1972.
The complete MLSE procedure would require tracing
numerous paths through a trellis and therefore cannot
be realized at the desired data rate. A modified
version using a threshold detector with decision
feedback which corresponds to a state reduction of the
MLSE procedure down to one state was implemented, as
described by M. V. Eyuboglu, S. U. Quershi, "Reduced
State Sequence Estimation With Set Partitioning and
Decision Feedback", IEEE Trans. communications, Vol.
COM-35, pp. 13-20, January 1988. For this receiver
type, as well as for the optimum detector, the highest
reliability i5 achieved by using a four-level
~quaternary) ba~e band ~ignal without redundance
(provided that no additional equipment for decoding of
hannel codes i~ tolerated).
, ~ ~
~ -3-

- 2o.~0763
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention contemplates a digital
transmission system for the simultaneous transmission
of several digital signals via separate wire pairs
located in a multi-pair cable.
The dominating near-end crosstalk experienced when
there are a large number of systems transmitting on
pairs within the same cable, is avoided by using a
cable which is divided into quads, with the wire pairs
; 10 within the same quad all handling signaling in the same
direction. When this configuration is used, the
resulting noise may be approximated by colored Gaussian
noise. Thus, a bundle cable with spiral quads can be
f fully wired when each spiral guad is used for the
tran3mission of signals in one direction only.
i A binary signal would be affected by the channel
;~ attenuation which grows for an lncr~asing freguency in
a much more rigorou~ manner. Therefore, a quaternary
~ignaling (1.024 M baud) is used in the present
invention. The binary, scrambled digital source
signals axe re-coded into redundance-free quaternary
transmitted signals.
,~
~,:
~ -4-
.~

2U~0763
The received signals, which are Nyquist-distorted
and suffer from low frequency attenuation, are
adaptively equalized in a symbol-interference-free
manner, and the low-frequency signal portions that have
been lost along the transmission path are recovered by
means of a quantized feedback (decision-feedback
equalization).
The signals which are equalized in an interference-
free manner are detected by means of a simple threshold
detector. From the difference between a received
signal value present at the optimum detection time and
the useful value of the received signal estimated on
~ the basis of the decision, an estimate of the
!~J interference is obtained by subtraction. On the basis
i~
of previous estimated interference values and the
¢urrent estimated interference value, a prediction of
the interference at the next detection time is made by
f~ means of a linear filter. This predicted value is
subtra¢ted from tho slgnal value at the next detection
time, in order to achieve a reduction in the effective
;~
Z~3~ interference power.
The prediction of the interference value is
possible because, on the basis of the crosstalk
frequency response and by means of the equalization,
linear statistical links within the interference
i,jlZZ ~
' ~Z
,~,Z ~ ~:
~: :

201~763
process, which is produced in its predominant part by
cross-talk of signals of the same kind in the multi-
pair cable, are formed. The interference predictor
filter can also be used adaptively for minimization of
the remaining residual interference power.
The predominant part of the receiver is realized
digitally, in accordance with the methods known from
digital signal processing. The receiver, in this way,
achieves the maximum possible interference protection
against crosstalk interferences in the case of the use
of a threshold value detector. However, only small
losses in the signal-to-noise ratio, as compared with
optimal detection (correlation receiver for all
possible symbol sequences), must be accepted.
The novel tran6mission proces6 is characterized by
the fact that, instead of the QR structure (decision-
feedback equalization) of the interference value
prediction with a double realization o~ the predictor
filter in the signal path and in the ~e~dback path,
ZO which is designated as optimal in Adaptive ~ilters, by
I
M. L. Honig and D. G. Mes6erschmitt, Kluwer Academic
Publi6hers, Bo6ton, (1984), a simple structure of the
s~ interference-value predictor with a single realization
of the predictor ~ilter is used in the present case.
This is because, in the case of the present use, the
6-
,.,

~o76~
quaternary signal is the optimal of all redundance-free
transmitted signals. The ætructure according to the
drawing is found to be superior to the QR structure for
this quaternary signal.
~ An additional characterizing feature is the
separate possibility of adjustment of the filters for
the (linear and decision-feedback) equalization and for
the interference-value prediction made possible in this
way. By this means, different setting algorithms for
these filters and different adaptation speeds for
equalization and interference-value prediction can be
selected. A setting of the interference-value
prediction that is slower as compared with the
equalization produces a distinct broadening of the
range for transmis~ion properties (cable length, wire
diameter, type of interference) within which a
7'
successful adaptation is possible for an identical
I ` coefficient number of the digital filters. In
,1
addltion, by means of the ~tructure with separate
~i 20 setting algorithms for the equalizer (zero-forcing
algorithm) and interference-value prediction (minimum-
mean-square algorithm?, a more effective interference
~::
suppression 1s aahieved in the case of stationary
operation than when a common setting procedure is
selected for all filter~.
-7-
,~ ~
,~
...... , ,,- , . ,.. ;.. ~,, ,:.; ,.,.. , .. , .. , ,. , , , ,. , . , ~ , ~ . .
- , ,, ,- - ,;, , " , , - ;,:; -

;~0~0763
- Another identifying characteristic of the novel
transmission process is that analog compromise-type
preliminary equalization is carried out to reduce the
coefficient number of the linear and of the decision-
feedback part of the adaptive, digitally realized
equalizer. This is designed in such a way that a
; whitened match filter, as in "Detectors and Optimum
Receiver Filters for Digital Signals with Intersymbol
, Interference", Part I and Part II, by J. Huber,
s 10 Frequency 41 (1987), pp. 161-167 and pp. 189-196, is
contained as a factor and that, in this way, a
transition from a continuous-~ime signal to discrete-
time scanning values without loss of information is
ensured. In this way, this compromise equalizer
corresponds to the optimal Nyquist filter for the cable
attenuation and cross-talk transmission function
q, .
expected on average, This usually results in roll-off-
~actor~ the pul~e ~haper part o~ the compromise
equalizer that are between 0.3 and 0.6 and which lead
to optimum increases in the signal-to-noise ratio.
As another characterizing feature of the
transmission system is achievement of an optimization
of the detection time on the basis of the coefficients
set in the linear adaptive equalizer, which is also
carried out in an adaptive manner. In this way, long-
-8-
,,' ', ;, ',' ,.' '' ''' '. :' ' ' : `,, ' `.', ," ' ' ;, :' ' ',
.. ;. ., ~ . : . :, . : . ,, , :, " .

X0~0763
term variations of cable properties or of the
oscillator for the timing recovery in the receiver are
equalized.
The invention can be used advantageously in local
subscriber line networks for increasing the field
length for 2.048 Mbit/s transmission. The predominant
number of subscribers is reached in this way without a
regenerative repeater. As a result of the improved
interference protection against crosstalk and impulsive
interferences, a very high degree of assignment of the
local connecting cables with 2.048 Mbit/s systems of
the same kind with a relatively large field length can
be achieved. By means of a skillful selection of the
different setting algorithms for the equalization and
the interference-value prediction, the high-pass
~iltering system becomes completely effective against
the unsteady impulsive interferences.
DESCRIPIION OF TNE DRA,WING
,
An exemplifying embodiment of the invention is
represented in the drawing which is a schematic
diagram.
:.
'3:
g _
i: :
,?:
,~ .. : . , . ,`, , ., , , .,. . : . , . , . :

2010~6~
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
A redundance-free four-stage (quaternary) line
signal is transmitted on a wire pair of a multi-pair
cable. The multi-pair cable is a bundle cable with
spiral quads with the pairs in each quad used for
transmission in one direction only. The signal is
etrongly dietorted and attenuated on the way to a
receiver, in accordance with the transmission function
of the wire pair, and is present at a receiver input as
an intelligence signal e(t). The intelligence signal
e(t) is superposed by crosstalk interferences from
., ,
~; transnission systems of the same kind operated on
adjacent wires in the same quad, and from unsteady
impulsive interferences of electro-mechanical switched
systQme.
Both the intelligence eignaI and all interferences
at the receiver input are ~ilterèd w1th a high-pass
~ilter. This high-pae~ filter HP reduces the low-
frequency impulsive interferences. A linear equalizer
2 and decision-feedback equalizer 3 eliminate the
impulsive interferences of the intelligence signal e(t)
according to the first Nyquist criterion. By dividing
the linear equalizer 2 into an analog compromise
equalizer KE having a fixed setting and an adjustable
~ 10-,
~ ,
: ~
:
. :v , . . -
. . ~ . ~:

20~0763
digital equalizer DE, the number of required
coefficients, cO through cL~ of the equalizer DE is
reduced.
The output signal of the analog compromise
equalizer KE is scanned by the symbol clock pulse T to
produce a sequence of discrete scanning values (ei~.
The discrete values (ei) are analyzed with the
transverse filter TF2 of the adjustable digital
equalizer ~E in accordance with the setting of the
coe~ficients aO through CL, to produce a sequence of
the discrete-time openings (di). The detection time is
established on the basis of the coefficients CO through
CL to achieve optimization of the detection time to
compensate for long-term variations of cable properties
or of the oscillator for the timing recovery. The
optimization of the detection time is related to the
moment o~ scanning. The concept iB to use the
Q~iciQnts to ad~u~t the tact. Such a moment for
: scanning may, for example, be any one of the following:
L
; 20 ¦Cj¦ = Max
o
:,
~ or
.
i ~ ~
--1 1--
,~
.... .

2o~0~63
L-l
¦ = Max
= o
or
CL = Max
A compensation signal dQRi is derived from a
detected signal vi via a transverse filter TF3 of the
decision-feedback equalizer 3 in accordance with the
coefficients bo through bM. m is compensation signal
dQRi is intended to cancel distortion caused by the
high-pass filter HP. The distorted signal, with its
scanning values ki, is formed by means of a difference
function where ki = di ~ dQRi. The distorted signal ki
contains an intelligence signal component and an
interf~rence-~lgnal component.
:The adaptive setting of the coefficients cO
:
~ through cL and bo through bM is performed as described
,
by K. P. Graf and J. Huber, two of the inventors, in
"Design and Performance of an All-Digital Adaptive
z.048 Mbit/s Data Transmission System Us1ng Noise
Prediction", Proceedings of International Symposium on
-12-
; ~
f~
: " .,, . , ", ,, , , , : -, : , , . , :- . . .

2010763
Circuits and Systems (ISCAS~, May 1989, which is
incorporated herein by reference. The method uses the
known zero-forcing algorithm as described in Principles
of Data Communication, R. W. Lucky, J~ Salæ and E. J.
Weldon, Jr., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.
An adaptation of an interference-value predictor 1
with coefficients Pl through PN is carried out
completely independently of the setting of the
distortion. The known minimum-mean-square algorithm,
also described in Principles of Data Communication, is
used in this case. The scanning values ri f the
predictor input signal are formed by subtraction of the
detected signals vi from the compensated and equalized
signal ki, which is delayed by the duration of one
symbol interval T, such that ri = ki_l - vi. The
signal ki i~ superposed by colored interference which
~' 7
is caused primarily by crosstalk, and there is an
absence o~ ~ignl~icant whito interference in ki. These
scanning values of the difference signals ri are
analyzed with the transverse filter TFl of the
lnterference-value predictor 1 in such a way that the
predict~ble part of the interference mi is subtracted
from the scanning values ki to form values xi which are
provided to the detector SD. Thus, only the
intelligence signal component and the interfering
-13-
.
~1:: :~
~". ,,, . ,.. , ;., .... ,., . ", . , ~.. ,.... " ., -; . ..... ....

2Q~()763
component are present at the input of the threshold-
value detector SD as a signal xi, without a correlation
within the intelligence signal component and the
interfering component. The decision process therefore
provides greater interference protection, because of
the de-correlation.
The complexity of an implementation of the present
invention may be greatly reduced by application of the
sign algorithm wherein only the signs of the signals
that are used for the adaptive filter coefficient
settings are used. It has been found that by merely
using the signs of the signals for the coefficient
correction settings rather than the values of the
signals themselve~, the hardware may be greatly
simplified while the correction produced is still
sati~factory.
With the system of the invention it is possible to
achieve a total attenuation of 44 dB. The roll-off-
~actor o~ the receiving ~ilter may be 0.5. The system
provides a possible transmission range of nearly 3 km
on copper conductors of 0.4 mm diameter and nearly 5 km
on copper conductors of 0.6 mm diameter.
An implementation of the present invention,
including experimental results, is further described in
the article, "Deslgn and Performance of an A11 Digital
:, ,

2010763
Adaptive 2.048 Mbit/s Data Transmission System Using
Noise Prediction", written by two of the inventors.
, ~
,~
~, :
L:~
~, ,
.;
.., ~
,~.~,. ,
,
.
.',5. . ' . ~ . ,

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 1997-02-24
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1997-02-24
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1993-08-23
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1993-08-23
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1993-02-23
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1993-02-23
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1990-08-24

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1993-02-23
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KE KOMMUNIKATIONS-ELEKTRONIK G.M.B.H. & CO.
Past Owners on Record
HANS-WERNER WELLHAUSEN
JOHANNES HUBER
KARLHEINZ TRONDLE
KLAUS-PETER GRAF
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1990-08-24 8 344
Cover Page 1990-08-24 1 40
Abstract 1990-08-24 1 30
Drawings 1990-08-24 1 37
Descriptions 1990-08-24 15 667
Representative drawing 1999-07-27 1 15
Fees 1992-01-28 1 37