Language selection

Search

Patent 2015021 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2015021
(54) English Title: DIFFERENTIAL FRICTION MEDIA DRIVE
(54) French Title: ENTRAINEMENT A FROTTEMENT DIFFERENTIEL POUR SUPPORT D'INFORMATION
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B41J 13/03 (2006.01)
  • B41J 13/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • UNDERWOOD, JOHN A. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1990-04-20
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-03-29
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
414,829 (United States of America) 1989-09-29

Abstracts

English Abstract


DIFFERENTIAL FRICTION MEDIA DRIVE
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
An apparatus for providing motive force to a medium
(14), including a high friction drive surface (16) and a
drive plate (20) which is surfaced with an extremely low
friction material (30) is provided. The friction differ-
ential produced by the surface variations is sufficient to
furnish superior transfer of motive force and to avoid
problems of jamming and mishandling. Placement of a print-
head (12) near the drive surface (16) allows for high qual-
ity printing, and very small top and bottom margin dis-
tances.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


12
CLAIMS
1. An assembly for moving a print medium through a
printer, comprising:
a high friction moving surface for transmitting
motive force to the medium;
means for imparting motive force to said high
friction moving surface;
an extremely low friction stationary surface for
causing the medium to be pressed against said high friction
moving surface; and
means for tensioning said extremely low friction
stationary surface toward said high friction moving sur-
face.
2. The assembly for moving a print medium of claim 1,
wherein:
said high friction moving surface is affixed to
a round drive roller; and
said means for imparting motive force to said
high friction moving surface is a means for causing said
round drive roller to turn upon the cylindrical axis of
said round drive roller.
3. The assembly for moving a print medium of claim 1,
wherein:
said extremely low friction stationary surface
includes an ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene tape.
4. The assembly for moving a print medium of claim 1,
wherein:
said means for tensioning said extremely low
friction stationary surface toward said high friction mov-

13
ing surface includes a spring steel backing plate on said
extremely low friction stationary surface.
5. A printer drive mechanism, comprising:
a print medium;
a drive roller;
a means for causing said drive roller to rotate;
a drive plate opposed to said drive roller; and
a low friction surface attached to said drive
plate at least at an area tangent to said drive roller.
6. The printer drive mechanism of claim 5, wherein:
said low friction surface attached to said drive
plate is an ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene materi-
al.
7. The printer drive mechanism of claim 6, wherein:
said ultrahigh molecular weight material is ad-
hered to said drive plate by means of a solvent resistant
acrylic adhesive.
8. The printer drive mechanism of claim 5, wherein:
said drive plate is made of spring steel.
9. A print medium feeder, comprising:
a means for propelling a medium; and
an ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene sur-
face for holding the medium against said means for propel-
ling the medium.
10. The print medium feeder of claim 9, wherein:
said means for propelling the medium includes:
a flat plate;
a high friction surface on said flat plate;
and

14
a means for moving said flat plate parallel
to said ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene surface.
11. The print medium feeder of claim 9, wherein:
said means for propelling the medium includes:
a round drive roller;
a high friction surface on said round drive
roller; and
a means for causing said round drive roller
to rotate.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2015~21
PATENT
P~-188429
~IFFERENTIAL FRICTION MEDIA DRIVE
TECHNICAL FIE$D
The present invention relates to medium drive mecha-
10nisms for computer hard copy printers. The predominant
current usage of the improved medium drive ~echanism is as
a means for causing a medium such as paper to move through
the printer and past the printing area in a thermal ink-jet
printer.
BACKGROUND ART
A num~er of various means have ~een employed to move
a medium such as paper through computer hard copy printers.
20The first of these was the traditional typewriter roller
arrangement. This arrangement proved unsatisfactory for
automated computer printers, however, because it was not
well suited for automatically accepting single sheets of
medium as they were fed into the printer.
25Other methods that have been tried have included trac-
tor feed mechanis~s wherein drive sproc~ets engage holes in
the medium. This method works ~ell for form-feed type doc-
uments and other ~edia; however, it is not adaptable for
use with single sheets of media.
30Current drive mechanis~s for ther~al ink-jet printers
frequently include roller mechanis~s wherein the medium is
passed between two opposing rollers as in the rollers of an
old ~ashioned washing machine. This arrangement works well
because it provides a positive feed ~or the mediuc and al-
3Slows the medium to exit the drive area in a straight line.
'
Case 188429
~,~ ' ,'::: . . ,

.
2~15021
However, the problem with this arrangement is that there is
frequently insufficie~t room to ea~ily include a pair o~
opposed rollers. This problem is particularly acute as re-
gards the top roller, as it may interfere with the movement
of the printhead if it is placed too near.
It is desirable to place the drive mechanism as close
to the printhead as possible, because the less distance the
medium has to travel from the drive mechanism to ~he print-
head, the less chance there is of it buckling in that in-
terval. Further, if the printhead could be placed nearerto the drive area, necessary top and bottom margins could
be greatly reduced. This is considered to be a highly de-
sirable feature. Therefore, printer designers have been
faced with the dilemma of having to place the drive mecha-
lS nism as close as possible to the printhead to avoid buc~-
ling and to reduce necessary top and bottom margin sizes,
and also having to remove the drive mechanism from the
printhead sufficiently far to provide room for a top rol-
ler. This dilemma has been compounded by the fact that the
height of the printhead above the medium must also be mini-
mized, as this is an important factor in print quality.
Obviously, it would be desirable to provide a means
for driving media through printers which did not include a
top roller and therefore could be placed as close as is de-
sired to the printhead. However, previous attempt~ to de-
sign such a mechanism have been less than successful. For
instance, if the top roller is replaced with a flat sur-
face, the medium has tended to feed improperly and to jam
in the drive mechanism unless an additional pair of drive
rollers is provided, thereby allowing for a clearance be-
tween the drive roller and the flat surface.
To the inventor's knowledge, no prior art mechanism
for driving medium through a printer has successfully met
desirable size restrictions so as to reduce the overall
size of the printer and also to allow the drive mechanism
Case 188429
., - , .

201~021
to be placed very close to the printhead. All successful
medium drive mechanisms to date have used either a combina-
tion of rollers or other complex mechanisms in order to
avoid the problems of mediu~ buckling, and also to avoid
the problems of mediu~ misfeed and jamming, and further to
cause the medium to exit the drive mechanism in a straight
line parallel to the printhead. Further, no prior art
mechanism for driving medium through a printer has allowed
for producing top and bottom margins as small as 2 to 3
millimeters.
DISC~OSURE OF INVENTION
This invention relates to a medium drive mechanism for
a computer hard copy printer having an extremely low fric-
tion surface opposed to a high friction drive surface.
This combination provides a positive medium drive formerly
available only with dual roller drive systems.
Briefly, the preferred embodiment of the present in-
vention is a medium drive mechanism constructed such that
a high friction rubber drive roller imparts a motive force
to a sheet print medium. The medium is held in place
against the rubber drive roller by means of a guide plate
including a structural backing mechanism and an extremely
low friction surface. In the preferred embodiment of the
present invention, the low friction surface is constructed
of ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene. Al-
though other very low friction materials such as Teflon
could be used in the manufacture of the inventive drive
mechanism, ~HNW polyethylene has been found by the inventor
to provide the best combination of low ~riction properties
and wear resistance. It has been found by the inventor
that drive mechanism$ so constructed are no more prone to
~amming or medium misalignment than are dual roller drive
mechanisms.
Case 188429

201~02~
The superior drive qualities of the inventive drive
mechanism are largely due to the fact that the sum of forc-
es on the medium produced by the inventive drive actually
produces a greater total force in the intended drive direc-
tion than have simil~r prior art drive mechanisms.
The inventive medium drive mechanism subassembly may
be placed closer to the printhead in a printer assembly
than is possible with a dual roller medium drive mechanism,
because the guide surface does not interfere with the move-
ment of the printhead as does a top roller. Of course, the
greater distance the medium has to travel after leaving the
drive mechanism and before getting to the printing area of
a printer, the greater the liXelihood that buckling or oth-
er medium misalignment may occur. But the primary advan-
lS tages of the inventive drive mechanism are that the amount
of necessary top and bottom margins are greatly reduced,
and that high image_quality may be maintained by allowing
placement of the printhead close to the medium and to the
drive assembly.
Therefore, the inventive method is conducive to the
highest print quality possible, since medium orientation to
the printhead is optimized. That placement of the drive
mechanism close to the printhead is desirable has long been
known. However, prior attempts to design mechanisms which
could be placed closer to the printhead have failed because
all such attempts have resulted in mechanisms that were
more prone to jamming or other problems than were the con-
ventional dual roller drive mechanisms. Therefore, prior
to the present invention, dual roller mechanis~s have been
incorporated into ink-~et printer assemblies.
Another desirable factor of the present invention is
that a drive mechanism constructed according to the inven-
tion may be made smaller than conventional mediu~ drive
mechanisms, there~y facilitating a reduction in overall
printer size.
Case 188429
~,~.. .. . .
-~;3 ~

2~15~21
An advantage of the present invention is that the size
of top and bottom margins on the print medium may be de-
creased.
Another advantage of the present invention is that a
printer medium drive mechanism may be placed horizontally
closer to an ink-jet printer printhead.
Yet another advantage of the present invention is that
image quality is improved by allowing placement of the
printhead vertically closer to the medium.
A further advantage of the present invention is that
a tendency of medium to jam in the drive mechanism is re-
duced.
A still further advantage of the present invention is
that the unsupported area between a drive mechanism and a
printhead wherein a medium might buckle is reduced.
Yet another advantage of the present invention is that
overall printer size may be reduced.
These and other objects and advantages of the present
invention will become clear to those sXilled in the art in
view of the description of the best presently known mode of
carrying out the invention and the industrial applicability
of the preferred embodiment as described herein and as il-
lustrated in the several figures of the drawing.
3RIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a side view
of a portion of a printer including the drive mechanism o~
the present invention:
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation similar to
FIG. 1, showing the low friction surface o~ the present in-
vention replaced with a prior art pinch roller; and
FIG. 3 is a representation of the various forces ex-
erted on a print ~edium by a drive mechanism.
Case 188429
~-'''''' ' ~
:',.' . : '
.' ~

2~5~1
,
BE~T MODES FOR CARRYI~G QUT INVENTION
The best presently known mode for carrying out the in-
vention is a thermal ink-jet printer incorporating a con-
ventional printer per. and pen traversing mechanism, but al-
so using a medium drive mechanism in accordance with the
present invention, wherein motive force is transferred to
the medium via a high friction surface and the medium is
held against the high friction surface by an opposing low
friction surface. The medium drive mechanism of the pres-
ent invention is more compact then comparable prior art
drive mechanisms, and also provides for more accurate me-
dium placements than has been considered to be feasible us-
ing compact drive mechanisms. In the best presently known
embodiment of the present invention, the friction differen-
tial necessary to the succe~s of the invention is achieved
by use of an ultrahigh molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene
tape on the low friction suxface. The sum of the resultant
forces produced on the medium by the inventive drive mecha-
nism is greater in a desired drive direction than thatwhich is produced by comparable prior art drive mechanisms.
The predominant expected usage of the inventive medium
drive mechanism is in thermal ink-jet printers, wherein
clearance of the drive mechanism to the printhead pen is
critical, and especially in applications, wherein the
height O~r the combined assembly is a concern, such as in a
portable or small desk top units, and in applications
wherein minimal top and bottom margins are required.
A portion of the thermal ink-jet printer assembly o~
the presently preferred embodiment o~ the present invention
is illustrated in diagrammatic form in a side view in FIG.
1 and is designated therein by the general reference char-
acter lO. In most of its substantial components, the
printer lO does not differ signi~icantly from conventional
thermal ink-jet printers.
Case 188429
.:,rr, .-
~;~r~r " ~ ' :
5~ '-.
:~. ~ ~ . ' . '
'~r~
;~ ' :

2~15021
.
The conventional elements of the printer 10 include a
printhead 12 and a printhead traversing mechanism (not
shown) for moving the printhead 12 across a piece of medium
14, thus positioning the printhead 12 for printing upon the
medium 14.
The medium 14 is moved through the printer by means of
a high friction drive surface 16. In the presently pre-
ferred embodiment of the present invention, the drive sur-
face 16 is made of high friction rubber and constitutes the
surface 16 of a drive roller 18. A drive plate 20 is pro-
vided to hold the medium 14 firmly against the drive sur-
face 16. A means for pressing the drive plate 20 toward
the drive surface 16 in a force direction 22 is provided in
the presently preferred embodiment of the invention by con-
structing the drive plate 20 of spring steel and tensioning
it against the drive roller 18 in force direction 22.
The tangent point 24 of the drive roller 18 to the
drive plate 20, according to the present invention, trans-
fers motive force to the medium 14 in a medium advance di-
rection 26 as the drive roller 18 rotates in a rotationaldirection 28. Therefore, normal force in force direction
22 must be sufficiently great to prevent slipping and mis-
handling of the medium 14. The actual amount of necessary
normal force in force direction 22 may vary depending upon
the type of medium 14 used and other variables, but this
can be guickly and easily adjusted according to the exact
application to which the present invention is applied.
Contrary to previous beliefs about printer drive mech-
anisms, the inventor has found that sufficient normal force
in force direction 22 may be applied to prevent slippage
and resultant ~amming of the medium 14 when tangent point
24 is the point of transfer of motive force from the high
friction drive surface 16 to the medium 14. In t~s best
presently known embodiment of the present invention, an ul-
Case 188429
~ ~., -. -

2015~21
trahigh molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene tape 30 is ap-
plied to the drive plate 20.
Using the UHMW polyethylene tape 30, friction differ-
ential as between th~ first junction 32 of the high fric-
5tion drive surface 16 to the medium 14, and the second
junction 34 of drive plate 20 to the medium 14, sufficient
to prevent problems previously believed to be unavoidable
in such an application, may be created. UHMW polyethylene
tape may be obtained from 3M Company, Industrial Tape Divi-
10sion, St. Paul, Minnesota, under their part number 5425.
The tape is provided with a solvent-resistant acrylic adhe-
sive backing (not shown) for adhering the UHMW polyethylene
tape 30 to the drive plate 20.
As opposed to prior art mechanisms, as depicted in
15FIG. 2, wherein a pinch roller 44 is used to reduce drag,
the UHMM polyethylene tape of the presently preferred embo-
diment of the present invention allows the printhead 12
(FIG. l and FIG. 2) to be placed closer to the tangent
point 24 while not necessitating raising the printhead 12
20higher above the medium. ~his is an important advantage in
thermal ink-jet printers, since maintaining the printhead
12 at a minimal height above the medium 14 is necessary to
print quality, and since placement of the printhead 12
close to the drive tangent point 24 allows printing on a
25greater portion of the medium 14, thereby reducing the size
of top and bottom margins (not shown).
Referring now to F~G. 3, wherein is depicted a drive
force 46, a drag force 48, and two normal forces 50 acting
on a print medium 14, it can be seen that the sum of forces
30~6, 48, and 50 will influence movement of the medium 14 in
the medium advance direction 26. The normal forces 50 are
produced, in the best presently known emkodiment of the
present invention, by tensioning of the drive plate 20 to-
ward the drive roller 18. Since the drive plate 20 and the
35drive roller 18 are immobile in the plane of the normal
Case 188429
:? ~
:"j., -:: :-

201~21
, .
forces 50, the two normal forces 50 are necessarily equal
in magnitude and opposite in direction. The drive force 44
in medium advance direction 26 acting on the medium 14 is
a function of the product of the normal force 50 and a
friction factor between the high friction drive surface 16
and the medium. The drag force 46 acting in a direction
opposite to medium advance direction 26 is a function of
the product of the normal force 50 and a friction factor
between the low friction surface 30 and the medium 14. As
can be appreciated by one skilled in the art, greatly re-
ducing the friction factor between the medium 14 and the
drive plate 20 by addition of the low friction surface 30,
causes the ratio of the drive force 44 to the drag force 46
to be greatly increased. The sum of forces acting on the
medium 14 in a plane parallel to the medium drive direction
26 is the drive force 44 minus the drag force 46. The nor- -
mal force 50 can be increased, in accordance with the pres-
ent invention, to a value necessary to provide sure and
positive handling of various types of medium 14 without
slippage or other mishandling of the medium 14.
various modifications may be made to the invention
without altering its value or scope. For example, the high
friction drive surface 16 may be part of a flat sliding
plate, rather than a roller. Another conceivable altera-
tion would be to use another very low friction surfacingmaterial as a substitu~e for the UHMW polyethylene tape 30.
All of the above are only some of the examples of
available embodiments of the present invention. Those
skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous other
modifications, alterations, and adaptations may be made
without departing from the spirit and scope of the inven-
tion. Accordingly the above disclosure is not intended as
limiting and the appended claims are to be intarpreted as
encompassing the entire scope o~ the invention.
Case 188429
'
'

- 201~2~
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
Thermal ink-jet printers have found wide acceptance in
the marketplace. Among the many desirable qualities of
thermal ink-jet printers are the high print quality and the
ease of use of these printers. The present invention has
been found to enhance both of these qualities. The print
quality of thermal ink-jet printers is enhanced through use
of the drive mechanism of the present invention by virtue
of the fact that the printhead may be placed at a height
which is relatively close to the medium as compared with
prior art arrangements, and because the height relationship
of the medium to the printhead is held relatively constant
by virtue of the fact that the medium is supported close to
the printhead by the inventive drive assembly.
Since printing is accomplished in a thermal ink-jet
printer by ejecting droplets of ink onto the medium, any
vari~tions in the plane of the medium relative to the sur-
face of the printhead from which the ink is ejected will
result in a reduction of print quality. Since the market-
place for thermal ink-jet printers is quite competitive and
since one of the major differentiating factors of such
printers is the print quality, any innovation such as the
present invention which will enhance quality will greatly
enhance the utility of the printer in the marketplace.
Furthermore, since the printhead may be placed very
close to the drive assembly, according to the present in-
vention, the top and bottom margins (unprinted areas) may
be greatly reduced. These margins are a function of the
distance from the drive assembly to the printhead, since
the medium must necessarily be supported in the drive as-
sembly when printing is being accomplished, ~nd since the
absolute minimum margin would be the distance from the
printhead to point at which the medium is supported by the
drive assembly. It is thought that this factor alone will
Case 188429
.,,, . ,. :
.. i :
~, ;-

20~502~
provide a major benefit to the users of printers employing
the inventive drive mechanism.
Ease of use of thermal ink-jet printers is greatly
reduced by any jamming or mishandling of medium within the
printer. Minor variations in medium handling will result
in print being improperly placed upon the medium. Major
mishandling problems require operator intervention and are
considered to be extremely detrimental to user satisfac-
tion. For this reason, dual roller type medium drive mech-
anisms have been used in spite of the fact that they are
less than ideal for other reasons discussed herein.
However, the inventive mechanism has been found to be
as conducive to error-free medium handling as have prior
art dual roller mechanisms. Therefore, it is anticipated
that medium drive ~echanisms according to the present in-
vention will greatly enhance the usability of thermal
ink-jet printers.
Another factor which may increase the acceptance and
usefulness of the inventive drive mechanism is that the
need for smaller printers is increasing. In fact, portable
printers to accompany portable computers may be a future
application.
Since the medium drive mechanisms of the present in-
vention may bs readily constructed and are easily incorpo-
rated into printer designs, it is expected that they will
be accepted in the industry as substitutes for conventional
medium drive mechanisms.
For these and other reasons, it is expected that the
utility and industrial applicability of the invention will
both sign$ficant in scope and long lasting in duration. `
Case 188429
.~;,, ~ .: -
~?~1 . ` .. .

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Office letter 2010-06-15
Inactive: Office letter 2010-06-15
Inactive: Single transfer 2010-02-24
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1992-10-20
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1992-10-20
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1992-04-20
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1992-04-20
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1991-03-29

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1992-04-20
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
JOHN A. UNDERWOOD
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1991-03-28 3 82
Drawings 1991-03-28 1 15
Abstract 1991-03-28 1 20
Descriptions 1991-03-28 11 499
Representative drawing 1998-07-05 1 4
Correspondence 2010-06-14 1 18