Language selection

Search

Patent 2015945 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2015945
(54) English Title: RADIO FREQUENCY NETWORK
(54) French Title: RESEAU RADIOFREQUENCE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H04N 05/38 (2006.01)
  • H01P 05/16 (2006.01)
  • H03H 07/48 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BURRAGE, CLEMENT P. (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • CLEMENT P. BURRAGE
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: KIRBY EADES GALE BAKER
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1990-05-02
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1990-11-05
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
8910410.3 (United Kingdom) 1989-05-05

Abstracts

English Abstract


- 14 -
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A radio frequency network, comprises a first common
node connected to a common input or output port, a
second common node, and at least three identical
branches therebetween, each branch comprising a first
branch node, to which is connected a balance load, and a
second branch node spaced therefrom and connected to a
branch output or input port, the network being
dimensioned and arranged such that an r.f. signal of a
specific frequency input at the common input port is
divided equally between all the branch output ports, and
a plurality of identical r.f. signals of the specific
frequency applied in phase to all the branch input ports
appear combined at the common output port.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 9 -
CLAIMS
1. A radio frequency splitter network, comprising a
first common node connected to a common input port, a
second common node, and at least three identical
branches therebetween, each said branch comprising a
first branch node, to which is connected a balance load,
and a second branch node spaced therefrom and connected
to a branch output port, said network being dimensioned
and arranged such that an r.f. signal input at said
first common node is divided equally between all said
branch output porks.
2. A radio frequency splitter network according to
Claim 1, wherein the impedances of the portions of the
branches between said second common node and each said
first branch node are such that substantially all of an
r.f. signal having any one of a range of frequencies
input at said common input port is divided equally
between all said branch output ports.
3. A radio frequency splitter network according to
Claim 2, wherein the impedance of the portion of each
said branch between said second common node and said
first branch node is substantially lower than the

- 10 -
impedance of the portion of said branch between said
first and said second branch nodes, and lower than that
of the portion of said branch between said second branch
node and said first common node.
4. A radio frequency network according to Claim 2,
comprising a short circuited stub connected to said
first common node.
5. A radio frequency splitter network according to
Claim 4, wherein said stub is equal in length to the
portion of any of the branches between said first common
node and said second branch node.
6. A radio frequency splitter network according to
Claim 2, comprising a quarter-wavelength transformer
connected between said first common node and said common
input port, the length of said transformer being a
quarter of the centre wavelength of the said range.
7. A radio frequency splitter network according to
Claim 2, wherein each said portion of each said branch
has a length equivalent to one quarter of said centre
wavelength of said range.

- 11 -
8. A radio frequency combiner network, comprising a
first common node connected to a common output port, a
second common node, and at least three identical
branches therebetween, each said branch comprising a
first branch node, to which is connected a balance load,
and a second branch node spaced therefrom and connected
to a branch input port, said network being dimensioned
and arranged such that a plurality of identical r.f.
signals applied in phase to all said branch input ports
appear combined at said first common node.
9. A radio frequency combiner network according to
Claim 8, wherein the impedances of the portions of the
branches between said second common node and each said
first branch node are such that a plurality of identical
r.f. signals, all of any one of a range of frequencies,
applied in phase to all said branch input ports appear
substantially combined at the common output port.
10. A radio frequency combiner network according to
Claim 9, wherein the impedance of the portion of each
said branch between said second common node and said
first branch node is substantially lower than the
impedance of the portion of said branch between said
first and said second branch nodes, and lower than that

- 12 -
of the portion of said branch between said second branch
node and said first common node.
11. A radio frequency combiner network according to
Claim 9, comprising a short circuited stub connected to
said first common node.
12. A radio frequency combiner network according to
Claim 11, wherein said stub is equal in length to the
portion of any of the branches between said first common
node and said second branch node.
13. A radio frequency combiner network according to
Claim 9, comprising a quarter-wavelength transformer
connected between said first common node and said common
input port, the length of said transformer being a
quarter of the centre wavelength of the said range.
14. A radio frequency combiner network according to
Claim 9, wherein each said portion of each said branch
has a length equivalent to one quarter of said centre
wavelength of said range.
15. A television transmitter, comprising a vision
modulated r.f. signal input, signal splitter means for

- 13 -
splitting said signal into a plurality of equal signals,
an amplification stage having a plurality of solid state
amplifiers operating in parallel, each of said equal
signals being input to a respective one of said solid
state amplifiers and the output of each said amplifier
being connected to a combiner network having a plurality
of input ports and a common output port connected to a
signal mixing stage for mixing a sound-modulated signal
with the combined vision-modulated signal, said combiner
network comprising a first common node connected to said
common output port, a second common node, and a
plurality of identical branches between said first and
second common nodes, each said branch comprising a first
branch node, to which is connected a balance load, and a
second branch node spaced therefrom and connected to a
respective one of said input ports, said combiner
network being dimensioned and arranged such that said
outputs from said solid state amplifiers appear combined
at said output port.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-I/7635/MCSL/CAN
,
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a radio frequency network
usable for splitting an r.f. signal or ~or combining a
plurality of r.f. signals.
- . ,
A particular application for a combiner is in
transmitters, for example television transmitters.
Conventionally, a television transmitter uses a klystron
in the r.f output stage to amplify the signal to be
passed to the antenna. While klystrons generally
perform this function satisfactorily and reliably, they
require complex cooling arrangements, usually employing
circulating water, and these require regular
maintenance. In addition, failure of the klystron -
renders the transmitter inoperative.
:'
For these reasons, there has been a move towards
the use of arrays of solid state r.f. amplifiers
operating in parallel in place of the klystron. With an
array of parallel solid state amplifiers, it is
necessary to combine the output signals in phase in such
a way that failure of individual amplifiers does not
jeopardize the total output.
- , , .
- .:

I/ 7 6 3 5/MCS L/ CAN .-
'
2 -- ~
.,~ ' .
summary of the Invention
The present invention provides a radio frequency
network, comprising a first common node connected to a
common input or output port, a second common node, and
at least three identical branches therebetween, each
branch comprising a first branch node, to which is
connected a balance load, and a second branch node
spaced therefrom and connected to a branch output or
input port, the network being dimensioned and arranged
such that an r.f. signal of a specific frequency input
at the common input port is divided equally between all
the branch output ports, and a plurality of identical
r.f. signals of the specific frequency applied in phase
to all the branch input ports appear combined at the
common output port.
. ;
All the inter-nodal distances are preferably equal
to one quarter of the operating wavelength of the input
signal or signals. However, for many applications, a
narrow network bandwidth is unsatisfactory. It has been
found that~the values of the impedances of the portions ;~
. .
of the branches between the second common nodes and each
first branch node have some influence on the bandwidth
..
' ' :' ' ` , ,, '., '::, ::, ::, :;: : ' ' ' ' . ' :. , , .. , . ' . : ' : ,: " .. ": ' , ' ' ' ,~ ' ,1, ', ' ' .' ' . ' ' ' .'" , , ' ' .

I/ 7 6 3 5/MCS L/ CAN
-- 3 --
of the network. By selection of suitable impedances for
these portions, the bandwidth may b~e increased. The
impedance is preferably low relative to the other
portions of the network.
A greater increase in bandwidth may be achieved by
providing a quarter wavelength transEormer between the
first common node and the common input/output port, the
length of the line added being a quarter of the
wavelength at the centre of the bandwidth. Still
further improvement of the bandwidth may be obtained by
connecting to the first common node a short circuited
stub, preferably having a length equal to a quarter
wavelength. By way of example, using this construction,
a twenty way combiner with a bandwidth of 88 to 108 NHz
for an input VSWR of less than 1.02:1 can be achieved.
When the network is used as a splitter, as each
output load fails, the input match deteriorates, but all
the other inputs stay at the same amplitude and phase.
This input deterioration could be cleaned up by, for
example, using a circulator.
', '
When the network is used as a combiner, as each
input; fails~, the output power drops by somewhat more
,
.:
.., ,~, . '

I/7635/MCSL/CAN
_ 4
than this input amount, depending on the number of
already failed inputs. Most of the surplus power
appears in the load adjacent to the failed input, with :
the remainder spread evenly around the other loads.
The network of the invention may be formed of
coaxial cable, multi-wire cable, waveguide, or even LC
circuits to give a 90 phase shift. The ~larter
wavelength lines may conveniently be any odd multiple of
quarter wavelengths where this makes the network
physically easier to realise. The use of greater
lengths carries the disadvantage, however, that the ;
opera~ing bandwidth becomes narrower.
Brief Description of the Drawings
In the drawings:
:'`
Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a
sixteen-way combiner in accordance with one embodiment
of the invention;
Figure 2 is a diagram of a modified form of the
combiner illostrated in Figore l; and ~j
: :"

I/ 7 6 3 5/MCSL/ CAN
: '
_ 5 _ :
Figures 3, 4 and 5 are graphs of insertion loss and .
VSWR against frequency respectively for the network as
shown in Figure 1, the network shown in Figure 2, but
without the stub, and the network shown in Figure 2 with
the stub. .:
Description o~ the Preferred Embodiments
Referring to Figure 1 the network comprises sixteen
identical branches la to lp extending between a first ~
common node 2 and a second common node 3. Each branch 1 :
comprises three equal lengths of coaxial cable joined at
a first branch node 4 and at a second branch node 5. A
balance load 6 is connected to the first branch node 4, :
while a branch input port 7 is connected to the second : :
..
branch node 5. The inter-nodal length is in each case
one quarter of the wavelength at the centre of the
operating bandwidth for the network, thus giving a 90
phase shift in each portion of the network for that
wavelength. The first common node 2 is connected to an
output port ~.
~, . .
In use, sixteen identical r.~. signals are applled
in phase to the branch input ports 7a to 7p. The signal
appearing~ at~the output port 8 is substantially the sum
,~,.
. ~ : :
::

-- I/7635/MCSL/CAN
- 6
of the input signals.
:
Referring now to Figure 2, the bandwidth of the
network may be increased by connecting a quarter
wavelength transformer 9 between the first common node 2
of the network illustrated in Figure l, and the output
port 8. A further improvement may be achieved by
connecting a short circuited quarter wavelength stub lO
to the first common node 2. Adjustment of the
impedances of the lines extending between the second
common node 3 and each of the first branch nodes 4a to
4p can also improve the bandwidth. The effects of these
modifications are illustrated by Figures 3, 4 and 5.
Figure 3 illustrates insertion loss and input VSWR
against ~requency for the network illustrated in Figure
1, where, in each branch, the impedance of the line from
the second common node 3 to the first branch node 4 is
280 ohms, the impedance of the line between the two
branch nodes 4 and 5 is 50 ohms, and the impedance of
the third line is 12.5 ohms. It will ~e seen that,
moving away ~rom the central frequency of approximately
670 MHz, one encounters rapidly increasing loss and
VSWR.
.
~ ~ ,
.:
:

--:I/7635/MCSL~CAN
Figure 4 shows the effect of a circuit in
accordance with Figure 2, but without the short
circuited stub. The impedances are set in each branch,
from the second common node 3 to the iirst common node 2
as 5 ohms, 50 ohms and 100 ohms respectivelyO The
quarter wavelength transformer has an impedance of 25
ohms. It will be seen that the bandwidth over which -
very low loss is experienced is very much greater,
extending from about 470 MHz to about 860 MHz the VSWR
over this range is also substantially reduced.
Figure 5 shows the effect of adding a short-circuit
stub, having an impedance of 49 ohms. The impedance of
the line in each branch extending ~rom the second common
node to the first branch node is increased to 50 ohms,
with all other impedances remaining the same. It will
be seen that, while the loss is very slightly increased
over the bandwidth of 470 to 860 MHz, the VSWR is
significantly reducad further. `
',
While the networks described with reference to the ;
drawings are symmetrically arranged with respect to
impedance, it has been found that by varying the ratio
o~ the impedances in one branch to those in any of the
remaining ~branches,~the power in that branch will vary ~-
'- '
... . .
~ -
....

I/7635/MCSL/CAN
-- 8
relative to that in each of the other branches. This is
of particular application in a splitter, if an uneven
distribution of output power is desirled.
It should be noted that the network of the
application, although particularly described with
reference to television transmitters, will find
application in many other types of transmitter, and
generally where a plurality of r.f. signals are to be
combined together or produced from a single such signal.
:
?
:::
: ' . '', '
. : ' . ~
',.' ,.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2015945 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Inventor deleted 1999-08-03
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1993-11-02
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1993-11-02
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1993-05-03
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1993-05-03
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1990-11-05

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1993-05-03
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CLEMENT P. BURRAGE
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1990-11-04 1 44
Claims 1990-11-04 5 223
Drawings 1990-11-04 4 119
Descriptions 1990-11-04 8 361
Fees 1992-04-13 1 46