Language selection

Search

Patent 2020709 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2020709
(54) English Title: CAM ACTUATED TRACTION CONTROL SYSTEM APPARATUS AND METHOD
(54) French Title: APPAREIL ET METHODE DE REGULATION DE LA TRACTION A COMMANDE PAR CAME
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B60T 8/32 (2006.01)
  • B60T 8/48 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • UMASANKAR, GURUSWAMY (United States of America)
  • KADE, ALEXANDER (United States of America)
  • FABRIS, ALROY G. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
(71) Applicants :
  • GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1990-07-09
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-03-30
Examination requested: 1990-07-09
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
07/416,245 (United States of America) 1989-09-29

Abstracts

English Abstract


C-4174
CAM ACTUATED TRACTION CONTROL SYSTEM
APPARATUS AND METHOD
Abstract of the Disclosure:
A traction control system (TC) pressure
actuator is provided. The actuator includes a frame
with a central bore fluidly exposed to a solenoid valve
and to a vehicle wheel cylinder. A piston is slidably
mounted within the bore having a contact surface and a
first predetermined position within the bore. A power
means is actuated by a controller. A cam is moved by
the power means has a ramp surface in contact with the
piston contact surface. The position of the piston
within the wheel cylinder is determined by the position
of the cam.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


15
The embodiments of the invention in which an
exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined
as follows:
1. A traction control (TC) pressure actuator
with fluid connections for a wheel cylinder and a
master cylinder via a solenoid valve, said actuator
being responsive to a fluid pressure controller, said
actuator in combination comprising:
a frame having a central bore fluidly exposed
to said solenoid valve and said wheel cylinder
connections;
a piston slidably mounted within said central
bore having a contact surface and said piston having a
first predetermined position within said central bore;
power means actuated by said controller;
a cam moved by said power means having a ramp
surface in contact with said piston contact surface and
whereby the position of said piston within said wheel
cylinder is determined by the position of said cam.
2. An actuator as described in claim 1
wherein said cam is a rotary cam.
3. A pressure actuator as described in claim
1 further including said piston having rotatably
connected thereto a roller providing the contact
surface for said cam.
4. An actuator as described in claim 2
wherein said cam when positioning said piston at said

16
first predetermined position, said piston is at bottom
dead center and said piston contact surface has
colinear contact with a flat portion of said cam.
5. An actuator as described in claim 1
wherein said braking system has a predetermined
pressure versus volume relationship and wherein said
cam is profiled to monotonically increase the required
torque of said power means with rotation along
substantially all of said rotation of said cam from
said first to second predetermined positions.
6. An actuator as described in claim 1
wherein said cam is profiled near said first
predetermined position to provide rapid motion of said
piston to displace an initial volume of said actuator
quickly.
7. An actuator as described in claim 1
wherein said braking system has a predetermined
pressure versus volume relationship and wherein said
cam is profiled to minimize the peak torque required by
said power means to rotate said cam for said actuator
to reach a desired peak braking system pressure.
8. An actuator as described in claim 3
wherein the center of rotation of said roller is
aligned with the center of rotation of said cam.
16

17
9. A traction control system (TC) pressure
actuator with connections for a wheel cylinder and a
master cylinder via a solenoid valve controlled by a
fluid pressure controller, said actuator being
responsive to said fluid controller, said actuator in
combination comprising:
a frame having a central bore fluidly exposed
to said solenoid valve and wheel cylinder connections;
a piston slidably mounted within said central
bore having a contact surface and said piston having a
first predetermined extreme bottom dead center position
within said bore and a second predetermined extreme
position within said bore opposite said first
predetermined position;
power means actuated by said controllers and
a cam mounted along a rotary axis moved by
said controller, said cam having a ramp surface in
contact with said piston contact surface, and said
cam having a stop surface whereby the position of said
piston within said frame is determined by the position
of said cam and whereby said first position said cam
stop surface determines the position of said piston
and causes said power means to signal said controller
that said piston is at said first predetermined
position.
10. An actuator as described in claim 9
wherein a spring biases said piston to said first
predetermined position.
17

18
11. A method of modulating the pressure in a
traction control system (TC) with a actuator with fluid
connections to a wheel cylinder and to a master
cylinder via a solenoid valve, said actuator being
responsive to a signal given by a fluid pressure
controller, said method in combination comprising:
fluidly exposing a frame with a central bore
to the solenoid valve and said wheel cylinder;
contacting said piston with a cam having a
ramp surface and a stop surface; and
powering said cam in response to a signal of
said controller, whereby said cam stop surface makes
contact with a stop and said controller is signaled
that said piston is in a first predetermined position.
18

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2 ~ ,t ?~
G~3680
C-4174
CAM ACTUATED TRACTION CONTROL SYSTEM
APPARATUS AND METHOD
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a method and
apparatus to prevent wheel spin and provide optimal
traction at each of the driven wheels of a vehicle when
driving on slippery surfaces.
Di~closure Statement
To maximize the traction of a vehicle drive
when it is sometimes necessary to retard the speed of
the vehicle wheel to keep the wheel from spinning.
Wheel spinning can often occur when a vehicle
accelerates on a icy surface or when the vehicle
undergoes high acceleration.
One method to prevent vehicle wheel spin is to
retard torque output of the engine. One method to
1~ achieve the above is to reduce the number of active
cylinders in the engine. Another methods are cutting
off fuel to the engine or retarding engine spark
timing. ~eliance on engine output control in of
themselves is disadvantageous in that the inertia of
the drive train is still quite high after the initial
action of the engine control. Therefore, torque levels
of the drive wheels remain higher longer than desired
even though the engine may have slowed down.
Still another disadvantage is that modulating
engine timing or fuel supply can sometimes cause the
engine to operate in a rough manner.

r~ 3
Still another disadvantage relying exclusively
upon engine control to retard vehicle wheel pin, i6
that occasionally, especially on icy surfaces, two
wheel on a common differential can have radically
different rotational speeds. Therefore, reliance on
engine torque retardation alone does not necessarily
mean that the wheel whose rotational speeds needs to be
lowered will be so in comparison with the other wheel
on a common differential. Furthermore, reliance upon
engine retardation alone lowers the maximum torque
available to the other drive wheel (typically on dry
pavement) which is not spinning.
To provide a better traction control system in
addition to engine retardation, or if desired in
exclusion of engine retardation, the brakes may be
selectively utilized to restrain the wheel which is in
the spinning condition.
one major method is to utilize a system where
in a normal braking condition, the master cylinder
delivers pressurized brake fluid to the brake cylinder.
There is a solenoid valve between the master cylinder
and the wheel cylinder. When a wheel spin condition is
recognized by a wheel sensor, a traction control system
controller will signal the solenoid valve to a closed
position to isolate the master cylinder from the wheel
cylinder. An independent source of pressurized fluid,
typically a pump which feeds into a accumulator, is
selectively connected with the wheel cylinder via a
solenoid valve to apply the brakes to restrain rotation
of the wheel. Another solenoid valve which is

~ t~
controlled by the controller will be selectively opened
to relieve the brake fluid to a reservoir to provide
modulation of the brake pressure to the wheel to
prevent lock up of the same.
The above system requires at least three
single action solenoid valves for each separate wheel
traction control is desired upon. One to provide
isolation between the master cylinder and wheel
cylinder, another to allow pressure from the
accumulator to pressurize the brakes, and yet another
solenoid valve to allow release of the pressure to a
reservoir. Typically a dual acting solenoid can be
utilized for one of the valves, however, solenoid
valves tend to be the major cost item for a traction
control system of this type. On a four wheel drive
vehicle up to twelve solenoid valves may be required.
Secondly, to ensure very fast response, the capacity of
the accumulator and pump needed for such a traction
control system, especially when utilized in a four
wheel drive vehicle, can be very large indeed.
In an alternative method, a solenoid still
isolates the master cylinder from the wheel cylinder.
To selectively pressurize the brakes there is an
electric motor which is gearably connected with a drive
screw mechanism which is threadably engaged with a
piston slidably mounted in a cylindrical fluid
actuator. A disadvantage of the above-noted system is
that its performance characteristics are not ideally
suited for the typical vehicle braking system whose
pressure/volume relationship is nonlinear. That is, at

Y ~Y
the lower pressure stages due to the volumetric
compliance of the brake system, a large initial
displacement must occur before the brake system will be
pressurized. In the electric motor/drive screw
mechanism displacement will be a direct function of
motor rotation. Therefore response for initial
displacement can be retarded or motor size may have to
be larger than desired. Also, at the higher pressure
stages, a higher motor current will be required since
displacement (which is constant function with
relationship to motor rotation) will be too fast in
relationship to the pressure buildup into brake system
since compliance not aS great a factor at the brake
system maximum preSSure. In other words, there is a
need for a variable mechanical ratio in the drive train
to better match the torque characteristics of the
electric motor with pressure volume relationship of the
vehicle braking system.
Summary of the Invention
To provide an alternative actuator for
pressurizing the brakes of a traction control system,
to the systems aforedescribed and to overcome certain
disadvantages associated therewith the present
invention is brought forth.
The present invention provides a traction
control brake fluid actuator appara'tus and method of
utilization thereof which utilizes a cam which acts
against a piston slidably mounted within a cylinder to
modulate the pressure within the wheel brake when the
braking system is in a traction control mode. The use

of the cam offers the opportunity to vary the
mechanical ratio over different ranges of the piston
stroke. The cam profile is designed and optimized to
fit the pressure versus volume relationship of a given
brake cylinder (brake cylinder as used in this
application can relate to drum or caliper and disc type
brakes). The cam of the present invention has a low
mechanical ratio at the lower range of the piston
stroke where the brake pressures are lower, and a high
mechanical ratio at the upper range of the piston
stroke when the brake pressures are higher. The cam
profile offers the advantages of aggressive
performances at lower brake pressure due to the lower
mechanical ratio (higher piston speeds), thereby giving
high initial volume displacement. Additionally, the
motor torque required to actuate the piston at the
maximum brake pressure is lowered due to the high
mechanical ratio at the high pressures. The above
results in lower peak current drawn on the vehicle's
electrical system and potentially lower cost of power
electronics. Additionally, the relationship between
brake pressure and motor torque current is nonlinear by
virtue of the cam profile design. The nonlinear
relationship better matches the control algorithm
described in U.S. Patent 4,673,225, commonly assigned,
and provides optimal system performance.
It is an object of the present invention to
provide a cam actuated actuator apparatus and method of
utilization thereof for a vehicle traction control
system.

Further objects, desires and advantages of the
present invention can become more apparent to those
skilled in the art as the nature of the ;nvention is
better understood from the accompanying drawings and a
detailed description.
Brief De~cription of the Drawing~
Figure 1 is a sectional view of a preferred
embodiment actuator according to the present invention;
Figure 2 is a v~ew taken along line 2-2 of
Fiqure 1
Figures 3 and 4 are views illustrating the
relationships of cam lift versus rotation and brake
system pressure versus volume displacement
respectively;
Figures 5 through 9 are schematic views
illustrating design considerations;
Figure 10 is a view illustrating the rate of
lift with respect to cam rotation.
Detailed DescriDtion of the Drawings
The present invention is shown in detail on
Figures 1 and 2, and functions in the following manner.
(Note: the following description applies to an
automobile with two driven wheels. But the method and
apparatus are applicable to automobiles with more than
two driven wheels (e.g. 4-wheel drive). A traction
control actuator 7 (TC actuator) device such as the one
~hown in Figures 1 and 2 is required for each driven
wheel assuming that wheel is on an axle with a
differential).
~.,

J
During normal operation of the vehicle, normal
braking takes place through a normally open solenoid
valve 13. Brake fluid from the master cylinder 15
causes a wheel cylinder 12 to actuate and apply a
5 braking force to the wheel(s) (or wheel rGtor 16)
through the normally open solenoid valve 13.
An actuator is provided having a housing or
frame 20 with a central bore 22 and a port 24 for fluid
connection with the wheel cylinder and a port 26 for
fluid connection with the master cylinder via the
solenoid valve.
A piston 40 is slidably mounted in the central
bore 22 of the frame of the TC cam actuator. The
piston is at its fully retracted bottom dead center
15 (BDC) position during normal operation. The brake
fluid pressure and the spring 28 force act on the
piston and tends to push the piston 40 down. The
piston has a contact surface provided by a roller 50.
Contacting the roller is a rotary cam 60 which is
connected with a gear box 62 torsionally connected with
a motor 64 (power means). In normal operation, the
roller is at the first predetermined sDC position in
contact with a stop surface 66 of the cam 50. The
piston 40 is held in position by the cam 50 at the BDC
position. No power is supplied to the motor 64. In an
embodiment not shown, the cam 60 will have studs
projecting parallel to its axis of rotation that will
contact stop surfaces fixed with respect to the frame
20 to define the limits of angular rotation of the cam.

In the TC mode of operation when the engine
torque is such that the drive torque limit of either of
the two driven wheels is exceeded, then that particular
wheel starts to spin. This wheel spin condition is
detected by the TC controller 70 using the wheel ~peed
sensor 80. The solenoid valve is closed and the motor
is actuated.
The motor 64 rotates the cam 60 through the
reduction gear reduction box 62. The cam 60 rotates
pushing the piston 40 up quickly into the bore 22. The
displaced brake fluid flows into the wheel brake
cylinder 12 and moves the brake pads (not shown)
towards the rotor/drum 16. The pads move to take up
the clearance gap ("initial volume") and touch the
rotor/drum. Braking torque is applied and the wheel
begins to decelerate and the wheel spin decreases. The
cam profile (shown in Figure 3) is designed with a high
initial lift characteristic causing the piston to move
guickly. Since the piston moves quickly to displace
the "Initial Volume" (volume of brake fluid required to
cause the brake pads to touch the rotor/drum), braking
starts before the wheel spin RPM becomes large and
therefore the wheel spin is quickly controlled. The
drive torque supplied to the other driven wheel ~tarts
to increase.
The motor current is then modulated by the TC
controller 70 and this regulates the braking torque on
the wheel is that started to spin and controls the
wheel spin. The drive torque on the other driven wheel
increases by the amount of the braking torque applied

on the wheel that started to spin and up to the level
that is set by the engine torque. If the engine
torque is high enough that the other driven wheel
starts to spin, then the TC controller uses another TC
actuator device to control the wheel spin in a similar
manner. TC controller 70 may also use a throttle
control device (not shown) to reduce the engine torque.
At the end of the TC mode of operation (no
wheel spin with no braking) the motor 64 is reversed,
the cam 60 is rotated returning the piston down 40 the
sDc piston. The spring 28 is a light spring that
overcomes the seal friction and returns the piston back
to its BDC.
The cam profile is shown in Figure 3. The TC
controller 70 uses the wheel speed sensor and motor
current as inputs to modulate the brake pressure and
control wheel slip. The relationship between the motor
current and the brake pressure is therefore a critical
characteristic of the mechanical system. The cam
profile, shown in Figure 3, is designed to better match
the control algorithm (U.S. Patent 4,673,225 awarded to
GM in June 1987) that is used in the TCS controller and
the pressure versus volume profile ~see Figure 4) of
the car brake caliper for optimal system performance.
In an alternate embodiment (not shown),
actuator frame bore 22 is also fluidly connected with
the master cylinder 15 via another line. Inserted
within the line is a check valve allowing flow only
towards the actuator 7. Therefore, when the actuator
is in a TC mode, the vehicle operator can override the

system by applying the brakes. The above-described
overridinq function can also be accomplished by using a
vehicle brake light circuit to also activate the
solenoid valve 13 to an open position restoring fluid
communication between the ~aster cylinder 15 and the
actuator bore 22.
Referring to Figure 4, for a typical braking
system the relationship between brake pressure ~P in
psi) and the volume ~V in inch ) is P ~ 20669
tV-0,035~1.7
Referring to Figures 5 and 6, it has been
found preferable that the rotational centers of the cam
and the roller be aligned with a line parallel with the
line of travel of the piston.
a = cam rotation from BDC
Yo - center distance from cam center to roller
at BDC along a line parallel to the
travel of the piston
Y - center distance from cam center to roller
center at a given cam rotation B along a
line parallel to the travel of the piston
C - pressure angle
dY - rate of lift with respect to cam rotation
dY - Y Tan C
To derive the force balance on the piston
during pressure apply, reference should be made
additionally to Figures 7 and 8 wherein
A ~ Area ~f the piston
- ~ where D - piston diameter
11
.~i,

URB = Coefficient of friction of the roller
bearing
= Piston friction force
FN - Normal force on the piston
FN = (P) (A) ~ FP
Cos C - URB (Sin C)
Analyzing the force balance on the roller:
FC = Contact force (normal) between the cam
and the roller
FF ~ Friction force between the roller surface
and the cam
RF ~ Roller radius (Figure 9)
RFB = Roller bearing inner radius (Figure 9)
FC ~ (P)(A) + FP
Cos C - URB (Sin C)
FF ~ tURBJ(FC) RF3
RF
Referring to Figures 7, 8 and 9, the relation
for cam torque (TC) is as follows:
RB = Cam bearing radius (Figure 6)
UB = Cam bearing friction coefficient
UC2 = Contact friction coefficient
TC = FC [Y Sin C + ~(URB)(RFB/RF) + UC2]
[Y Cos C - RF] + (UB)(RB) 11 +
~(URB)(RFB~RF) + UC2]2]1/2]
The relationship for motor torque (TM) versus
speed is as follows:
TM = TC
(E) (R)
12

where
R = Gear ratio
E = Gear box efficiency
Motor speed (NM) is derived as follows:
NM = NM max [l-TM/TM max]
also
TM = 1 (P)(A) + FP
(E)(R) Cos C - (UCl - UC2)
[Y sin C ~ (UCl + UC2)(Y Cos C - RF) +
(UB)(RB) [1 + (UCl + UC2) ]1/2]
where
UCl = URB (RFB/RF)
Finally, the pressure apply rate (PAR in
psi/sec):
PAR = (~r/30) (K)(A)(Y)(Tan C)(NM)
also
PAR = ~r/30) (K)(A~(Y)(Tan C)[(Nmax (-TM/TM max)]
where
K = caliper stiffness in PSI/inch
To optimize the cam design, the P-V
characteristic of the caliper (or wheel cylinder in a
drum brake) must be determined. Secondly, the piston
area (A), roller diameter (RF), gear rotor (R), gear
efficiency (E), motor maximum speed (NM max) and torque
(TM), maximum cam rotation (typi~ally 315), maximum
pressure angle (C) (typically 35) and minimum increase
in motor torque.
13
,,

y, nd (db) (d~) at Cl ... to CN
such that [P~R]l, .., [PAR]N are maximUm at Bl .. BN
(Figure 10).
The above is su~ject to the following
constraints: _
1. ~i = Tan- 1 ~b i~ [yi~ ~ C max, i = 1 ..., N
2. YN ~ v max/A
3- BN ~ B max
4. [TM]i - [TM]i - 1 ~ ~ TM i = 2, ... N
[TM] i
or, in other words, a monotonically increasing motor
torque.
Fourthly, find the optimum cam profile, then
change parameters in step 2 and get alternate cam
profiles by repeating steps 3 and 4.
While an embodiment of ~he present invention
has been explained, it will be readily apparent to
those skilled in the art of the various modifications
which can be made to the present invention without
departing from the spirit and scope of this application
as it is encompassed by the foll~wing claims.
.t ~ ~

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1994-01-11
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1994-01-11
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1993-07-09
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1993-07-09
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1991-03-30
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1990-07-09
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1990-07-09

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1993-07-09
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
ALEXANDER KADE
ALROY G. FABRIS
GURUSWAMY UMASANKAR
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1991-03-30 4 92
Abstract 1991-03-30 1 14
Cover Page 1991-03-30 1 13
Drawings 1991-03-30 4 63
Descriptions 1991-03-30 13 343
Representative drawing 1998-07-14 1 19
Fees 1992-06-25 1 29