Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
ACO 550~i US2
Ilcid Etch Resistant Coatings
Oackoround of the Invention
Tlre present invention relates generally to high solids coating
compositions suitable for use, far example, as high performance
automative coatings.
Many of the high performance, high solids automotive coatincis
presently in use are based upon polymeric systems comprised of either
polyester-based or polyacrylic-based polyols and crosslinkinq agents
therefor. These coatings are generally supplied as "one-pack" or
"two-pack" systems.
In a typical one-pack system, all of the coating ingredients are
combined into one storage stable mixture. Upon application the polyol
component is crosslinked, generally with an aminoplast resin (such as
a melamine resin) or a blocked isocyanate, under heat cure conditions
of 120°C or above. In a typical two-pack system, the polyol component
is combined with a crosslinking agent, generally an isocyanate,
shortly before application, with curing being c~ncicted at ambient or
elevated temperatures.
For environmental reasons, it is becoming increasingly important to
develop polyrrreric systems with low solution viscosities, which permit
the' formulation of high solids coatings with low application
viscosities suitable for spraying. High solids coatings (generally
about 50 wt% or greater solids) significantly decrease the amount of
volatile organic compounds (VOC) entering the atmosphere upon
drying/curing of the coating.
To achieve acceptable solution viscosities (20-30 seconds, III Ford Cup
at 20°C) for typical high solids coating systems, the polyols should
possess a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of about 5000 or lrnvc:r.
In general, the lower the Mw the lower the solution viscosity.
~~~~a'~~?~
~L»v'UC.'C~
a ACO 5504 US2
2
To achieve good film properties it is important that, upon film
formation, the. polyol molecules become sufficiently chemically bonded
to each other. This can be accomplished by providing each polyol
molecule with at least two reactive hydroxyl groups. A too low
hydroxyl equivalent weight (HEW) (e. g., below about 200), however, ma,y
lead to brittle films. It has bE~en found that, in general, the best
spectrum of film properties may be obtained for HEWS between about 300
to 500. It follows, therefore, that for good film formation the
poiyols should possess a number average molecular weight (Mn) of at
least about 800.
As is evident from the above discussion, the requirements for
acceptable solution viscosities and good film properties lead to
contradictory molecular weight requirements - for low solution
viscosities the Mw should be low, but for good film properties the Mn
should be high.
In acrylic free radical polymeri2ation and in polycondensation leading
to polyesters, it is difficult to achieve desirable molecular weights
with sufficiently narrow molecular weight distributions. In other
words, it is difficult to formulate high solids, high performance
coating systems from acrylic and/or polyester based polyols which
possess both acceptable application viscosities and resulting film
properties.
A considerable amount of work in this area has recently been done
relating to high solids, high performance coatings which are based, in
part, upon relatively low molecular weight polyesterurethane,
urethane-modified polyester and polyurethane polyols.
For example, US4485228, US4540766, US4540771 and US4605724 describe
high solids coating systems based, in part, upon relatively low
molecular weight polyesterurethane polyols and crosslinking agents
therefor. More particularly, US4485228 describes a two-pack system
ACO 5504 US2
3
with a polyisocyanate crosslinker, while US4540766 describes a
one-pack system with an aminoplast or blocked isocyanate crosslinker.
The polyesterurethane polyols of these references are produced via the
reaction of a polyisocyanate with a stoichiometric excess of a
polyester polyol.
In related US4543405 are disclosed high solids coatings based upon low
molecular weight polyurethane polyols and/or higher molecular weight
prepolymers (e. g., urethane-modified polyesters), which polyurethane
polyols are produced by reacting a polyisocyanate with a large excess
of a polyol. After completion of the reaction, the excess polyol is
removed, e.g., by diSLillation. Also relevant in this aspect is
US4288577.
US4548998, like those references just mentioned, describes a high
solids coating system based upon a polyesterurethane polyol, except
that the polyesterurethane polyol is produced by isocyanate-free
reaction of a polyester polyol, urea and a polyamine.
US4524192, US4530976, US4533703, US4533704 and EP-A-0139513 describe
similar high solids coating systems which are based, in part, upon
urethane-modified polyester polyols and crosslinking agents therefor.
The urethane-modified polyester polyols are produced by reacting a
urethane-modified diol component (from a diol and diisocyanate) with a
diacid component and a second polyol including at least 5wt% triol.
As mentioned above, due to environmental concerns it is becoming
increasingly important to reduce the VOC of coatings in general.
Additionally, due to the current deterioration of the environment and,
particularly, the proliferation of acid rain, it is also becoming
increasingly important that such coatings, upon curing/drying, display
improved acid etch resistance.
~ ~~, ~, sv
hu e..7 i.i 3.l
ACO 5504 US2
4
To obtain high solids while maintaining acceptable viscosity for spray
application, the industry has tended to decrease the Mn of the acrylic
and polyester based polyols and increase the amount of crosslinker.
Many of the state-of-the-art high solids systems, especially the one-
s pack systems, utilize aminoplast resins (such as hexamethoxymelamine
resins) as the crosslinker. Generally, however, as the amount of
aminoplast resin is increased, the acid etch resistance of these
coatings is compromised. It is believed that the ester bonds in
acrylic/melamine or polyester/melamine coatings are weak points in the
crosslinked network, and susceptible to acid catalyzed hydrolysis.
Others of the aforeme~~~ioned systems, formulated as two-pack systems
with isocyanate crosslinkers, provide better acid etch resistance;
however, the use of isocyanates has a number of disadvatages. For
example, these two-pack systems require special handling and storage
operations to avoid human exposure to the toxic isocyanates. Further,
the components can only be mixed shortly prior to use, often resulting
in mixing errors which can adversely affect the quality of the
resulting coating.
It would, therefore, also be advantageous to provide a one-pack, high
solids system, especially one that is isocyanate free, which displays
a good balance of physical and chemical properties and, especially,
good acid etch resistance.
Summary of the Invention
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a
particularly advantageous coating composition which, in its overall
concept, comprises:
(1) a polyurethane polyol possessing a number average molecular
weight in the range of from about 600 to about 3000 and a
degree of dispersion in the range of from about 1.1 to about
3.5, comprising the reaction product of (A) a diol component
6. ~~ 6'k' ~ ~ ~ :,.) f,.o
~ y' rJ t~ Y % ~ ~ t~
ACO 5504 US2
selected from substantially monomeric, assymmetric diols
wherein the hydroxyl groups are separated by 3 carbon atoms or
less, and (B) an isocyanate component selected from n
functional polyisocyanates, wherein n is a number in the range
5 of from 2 to 5; and
(2) an hydroxyl groups-reactive crosslinking agent.
It should be noted that, as used herein, the term "polyurethane
polyol" refers to a reaction product wherein the reactants (diol
10- component and polyisocyanate component) are linked substantially only
via urethane linkage. This is in contrast, for example, to the
aforementioned polye5i.erurethane and urethane-modified polyester
polyols, in which the reactants are linked via urethane as well as
ester linkages.
These coating compositions in accordance with the present invention
are particularly suitable as high solids clear and pigmented coatings
laving non-volatiles contents generally ranging from about 40 wt% to
about 80 wt=o. Even at these high non-volatiles contents, the coatings
possess relatively low viscosities generally ranging from about 25 cps
to about 300 cps (at 20°C).
Further, upon application and curing of the coating compositions, the
resulting films possess a number of desirable properties such as good
UV durability, chemical and weathering resistance and other properties
making them particularly suitable for use, for example, in automotive,
general industrial, plastics and decorative coatings applications.
These coating compositions find particular use in high solids, high
performance one-pack automotive coatings formulated with aminoplast
and blocked isocyanate crosslinking agents. It has been found that
such one-pack coatings, especially those formulated with the
aminoplast crosslinking agents, possess a surprisingly high acid etch
resistance as well as good non-yellowing behavior.
6~9 ~3 sp ."~ 4~ ~-3 ~:~
~A!J'~':u::'CjrJ
' ACO 5504 US2
6
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will
be more readily understood by one skilled in the art from a reading of
the following detailed description.
Detail-ed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
As just mentioned, the coating compostions in accordance with the
present invention comprise, in general, (1) a particular polyurethane
polyol and (2) a crosslinking agent for the hydroxyl groups of the
polyurethane polyol.
Suitable polyurethane pulyols are those possessing an Mn ranging from
about 600 to about 3000, preferably of about 2500 or less and greater
than about 1000, and a degree of dispersion (Mw/Mn) ranging from about
1.1 to about 3.5, preferably less than about 2.5, and especially less
than about 2.0, which comprise the reaction product of:
(A) a diol component selected from substantially monomeric,
assynnnetric diols wherein the hydroxyl groups are separated by
3 carbon atoms or less, and
(B) an isocyanate component selected from n-functional
polyisocyanates,
wherein n is a number in the range of from 2 to 5.
The isocyanate component is selected from n-functional isocyanates
wherein n is a number ranging from 2 to 5, preferably from 2 to 4, and
especially from 3 to 4. The isocyanate component may comprise a
single such n-functional isocyanate or combinations thereof.
As specific examples of suitable n-functional isocyanates may be
mentioned, for example, diisocyanates such as 1,6-hexane diisocyanate
(con,merically available, for example, under the trade designation FIMDI
from Mobay Chemical), isophorone diisocyanate (commercially available,
for example, under the trade designation IPDI from Huels America
Inc.), tetramethylxylene diisocyanate (conunercially available, for
CA 02020988 2001-O1-25
7
example, under the trade designation m-TMXDI from American Cyanamid Co.),
2-methyl-1,5-pentane diisocyanate, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexane diisocyanate,
1,12-dodecane diisocyanate and methylene bis(4-cyclohexyl isocyanate)
(commercially available, i:or example, under the trade-mark Desmodur W from
Mobay Chemical); and higher functional isocyanates such as a biuret of 1,6-
hexane diisocyanate (comme,rcially available, for example, under the trade-
mark
Desmodur N from Mobay Chemical), an isocyanurate of 1,6-hexane
diisocyanate (commercially available, for example, under the trade-mark
Desmodur N-3390 from Mobay Chemical), an isocyanurate of isophorone
diisocyanate (commercially available, for example under the trade-mark
Desmodur Z-4370 from Mobay Chemical), a reaction product of
tetramethylxylene diisocyanate and trimethylol propane (commercially
available, for example, under the trade-mark Cythane 3160 from A.mer~ican
Cyanamid), and a reaction product of one mole of trimethylol propane and
3 moles of toluene diisocyanate (commercially available, for example, under
the
trade-mark Mondur CB from Bayer).
Particularly preferred for use with the present invention are the biurets
and/or
isocyanurates of monomeric; diisocyanates, especially 1,6-hexane diisocyanate.
Isocyanurates are typically obtained by the cyclotrimerization of three moles
of
the diisocyanate, while biurets are typically obtained by the reaction of
three
moles of the diisocyanate with one mole of water. Also particularly preferred
are
the reaction products of monomeric diisocyanates with mufti-functional
alcohols
having from 2 to 4 hydroxyl groups, and wherein the ratio of hydroxyl groups
to
isocyanate groups is from about 0.45 to about 0.55.
As also indicated above, t:he diol component is selected from substantially
monomeric, asymmetric diols wherein the hydroxyl groups are seperated by
three carbon atoms or less. By "asymmetric diol" is meant a diol possessing
hydroxyl groups of a different order, for example, a primary hydroxyl group
and
a secondary hydroxyl group. In
~~~ ~~C:'t~7
ACO 5504 US2
8
other words, the diol component should comprise diols having one
hydroxyl group which is more reactive with an isocyanate group than
the other hydroxyl group on the molecule. The diol component may
comprise a single such monomeric, assymetric diol or combinations
thereof.
Preferred 'asymmetric diols are those possessing from 3-18, more
preferably from 4-18 and especially from 4-10 carbon atoms: and a
primary hydroxyl group, and especially a primary and a secondary
hydroxyl group. As specific preferred examples of such may be
mentioned 2-ethyl-1,3-hexane diol, 1,2-propane diol, 1,3-butane diol,
1,2-hexane diol, 1,2-octane diol, 1,2-decane diol and 2,2,4-trimethyl-
1,3-pentana diol. Especially preferred are 2-ethyl-1,3-hexane diol,
1,2-hexane diol, 1,2-octane diol, 1,2-decane diol and 2,2,4-trimethyl-
1,3-pentane diol.
The polyurethane polyols are produced by reacting the diol component
(A) and the isocyanate component (B) in a manner so as to result in
the aforementioned desired molecular weight properties.
Preferably, this may be accomplished by reacting the components, in
relatively stoichiometric ratios, at a temperature of about 125°C or
less, optionally in the presence of a polyurethane catalyst. More
specifically, the components should be reacted in an amount such that
the ratio of the number of isocyanate equivalents of the isocyanate
component to the number of moles of the diol component is in the range
of from 0.8 to 1.2, preferably from 0.9 to 1.1, more preferably from
0.95 to 1.05, still more preferably from 0.98 to 1.02, and especially
1 (stoichiometric).
Of course, the relative amounts of polyol and isocyanate components
will depend upon the functionality of the isocyanate component.
Stated another way, for every 1 mole of the n-functional isocyanate,
there should be reacted from 0.8n to 1.2n, preferably from 0.9n to
l.ln, more preferably from 0.95n to 1.05n, still more preferably from
0.98n to 1.02n, and especially n moles of the diol component.
r
CA 02020988 2001-O1-25
9
The components are preferably reacted at a temperature of about 125°C
or less,
more preferably ranging from about 15°C to about 125°C. The
components may
also optionally be reacted in the presence of a polyurethane catalyst.
Suitable
polyurethane catalysts are conventional and may be utilized in conventional
amounts. Of course, the particular choice of catalyst type and amount will be
dictated based upon a number of factors such as the particular components and
reaction conditions. These and other factors are well-known to those skilled
in
the art, who can make the proper choices accordingly.
In an alternative but less convenient process, similar polyurethane polyols
may
also be produced in a manner such as described in US4543405 (see, for example,
column 6, line 52 through column 7, line 55). More specifically, the
polyurethane polyols are produced by reacting, under generally standard
polyurethane reaction conditions, the isocyanate component with a significant
stoichiometric excess of the diol component. Upon completion of the reaction,
the excess diol component is removed, for example, by distillation. Further
details may be had by reference to US4543405.
Coating compositions may lbe formulated from these polyurethane polyols and
suitable crosslinking agents. As suitable crosslinking agents may generally be
mentioned any one of a number of well-known hydroxyl group-reactive
crosslinking agents, such as polyisocyanates, blocked polyisocyanates and/or
aminoplast resins.
The use of the above-described polyurethane polyols allows formulation of high
solid coatings, possessing a non-volatile content ranging from about 40 wt% to
about 80 wt°/~, at low solutions ranging from about 25 cps to about 300
cps,
preferably ranging from about 50 cps to about 200 cps, at 20°C.
CA 02020988 2001-O1-25
As mentioned above, an especially advantageous use of the polyurethane polyols
in accordance with the present invention is as a one-pack coating system
formulated with an aminoplast and/or blocked polyisocyanate crosslinking
agent, preferably an aminoplast crosslinking agent.
5
Generally speaking, the aminoplast crosslinking agents are aldehyde
condensation products of melamine, urea, benzoguanamine or similar known
compounds. The most commonly used aldehyde is formaldehyde. These
condensation products contain methylol or similar alkylol groups, which are
10 commonly etherified with an alcohol having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms, such
as
methanol or butanol. The aminoplast resin can be substantially monomeric or
polymeric depending upon the desired end properties of the coating. For
example, monomeric melamine resins are preferred because they allow coatings
with higher solid contents, while polymeric melamines are useful in coatings
where the use of a strong acid catalyst should be avoided.
As suitable specific examples of aminoplast crosslinkers of the type described
above may be mentioned hexamethoxymethyl melamine (commercially
available, for example, under the trade-mark Cymel 303 from American
Cyanamid); mixed ether methoxy/butoxy methylmelamines (commercially
available, for example, under the trade-mark Cymel 1135 from American
Cyanamid), polymeric butoxy methylmelamine (commercially available, for
example, under the trade designation M-281-M from Cook Paint and Varnish)
and high imino polymeric rnethoxymethyl melamines (commercially available,
for example, under the tradf;-mark Cymel 325 from American Cyanamid). This
list could include various other well-known crosslinkers which differ, for
example, by degree of polymerization, imino content, free methylol content and
ratios of alcohol used for etheritication.
CA 02020988 2001-O1-25
11
These aminoplast crosslinking agents may be utilized in widely varying weight
ratios of polyurethane polyol to aminoplast, generally ranging from about
90:10
to 40:60, preferably from about 90:10 to 50:50.
As suitable isocyanate crosslinking agents may be mentioned any of a number of
those known for use in similar systems. As specific examples may be mentioned
the previously described n-functional isocyanates, especially the biuret and
isocyanate versions. Blocking of such isocyanates is well-known to those
skilled
in the art and need not be detailed here.
As with the aminoplast crosslinking agents, the isocyanate crosslinking agents
may also be utilized in widely varying amounts, but generally in an equivalent
ratio of hydroxyl to isocyanate groups ranging from about 0.7 to about 2.2.
The coating compositions may also contain a catalyst for the curing reaction,
such as well-known acid catalysts and blocked derivatives thereof. Generally,
these catalysts are utilized in amounts ranging from about 0.1% to about S% by
weight based upon the weight of the non-volatiles in the coating.
As specific examples of suitable acid catalysts may be mentioned phosphoric
acid; alkyl acid phosphates such as phenyl acid phosphate; sulfonic acid and
substituted sulfonic acids, such as p-toluene sulfonic acid (commercially
available, for example, under the trade-mark Cycat 4040 from American
Cyanamid), amine blocked p-toluene sulfonic acid (commercially available, for
example, under the trade: designation VP-451 from Byk-Mallinckrodt),
dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid (commercially available, for example, under the
trade-mark Bio-Soft S-1()0 from Stephan), amine blocked dodecylbenzene
sulfonic acid (commerciall:y available, for example, under the trade-marks
Nacure 5226 and Nacure XP-158 from King Industries) and dinonylnaphthalene
disulfonic acid; and malefic acid and alkyl acid maleates.
CA 02020988 2001-O1-25
12
Depending upon the field of application, the coating compositions may also
contain a variety of other additives common to the paint industry such as
solvents, pigments, coloring agents, pigment dispersing agents, light
stabilizers,
and thixotropic and other rheological agents.
Especially for pigmented systems, the coating compositions will normally be
formulated to contain additives for flow, surface tension adjustment, pigment
wetting and/ar solvent popping. As examples of typical additives may be
mentioned flow aids (commercially available, for example, under the trade
designation A-620-A2 palybutylacrylate from Cook Paint and Varnish, and
BYK-320 silicone from BYK-Mallinckrodt); pigment wetting aids
(commercially available, for example, under the trade-mark Disperbyk from
BYK-Mallinckrodt); UV absorbers (commercially available, for example, under
the trade-mark Tinuvin 900 from Ciba-Geigy); and amine light stabilizers
(commercially available, for example, under the trade-mark Tinuvin 292 from
Ciba-Geigy).
These coating compositions may be applied onto any number of well-known
substrates by any one of a number of conventional application methods. Curing
of the coatings may be conducted under a variety of conditions, although
curing
of the above-described one-pack systems is preferably earned out under baking
conditions typically from about 80°C to about 200°C.
The foregoing more general discussion of the present invention will be further
illustrated by the following specific examples.
F'p '-~ :'~ F')
tJ ~ 7
ACJ 5504 US2
13
EXAMPLES
(I) Synthesis of the Polyurethane Polyols
Polyurethane Polyol A
Into a 2 liter, 3 neck round bottom flask equipped with a stirrer,
condenser, heating mantle, thermometer, dropping funnel and nitrogen
inlet were charged the following:
438 g of 2-ethyl-1,3-hexane diol,
188 g of butyl acetate and
0.1 g of dibutyltiii dilaurate,
and the mixture heated to 60°C under a nitrogen blanket.
When the temperature had reached 60°C, the heating mantle was
removed
and the following mixture added over a 30 minute period:
648 g of the isocyanurate of hexamethylene diisocyanate
(equivalent weight at 90% NV = 216) (conunerically available
under the trade designation Desmodur ~;-3390 from Mobay
Chemi cal ) and
185 g of butyl acetate.
During addition of this mixture, the reaction temperature was kept
below 70°C. After completion of the addition, the reaction
temperature was held at 70°C for 6 hours, at which point it was
determined (by Fourier Transform Infared Spectroscopy - FTIR) that no
residual isocyanate remained.
The resulting solution of polyurethane polyol A was a water white
resin solution having a non-volatile content of 63.9% and a Brookfield
viscosity of 1100 cps.
The molecular weights of the polymer were measured using a Waters
Associates (Milford, Mass.) Model 840 Gel Permeation Chromatograph
(GPC). The GPC was equipped with three 7.8nun ID X 30cm ultrastyragel
~ ~.~ L' ._i
ACO 5504 US2
14
colunms with linear, 100 and 500 angstrom pore sizes. A differential
refractometer was used as a detector, and all samples were run using
tetrahydrofuran (THF) as eluent with a flow rate of l.Oml/min.
Tp determine the molecular weights, a calibration curve was
constructed using a combination of polystyrene (PS) standards
(covering a high molecular weight range) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)
standards (covering a low molecular weight range) obtained
conunercially from American Polymer Standards Corp. (Mentor, Ohio).
The peak molecular weights (Mp) of the PS standards were 2070, 4000,
5450, 8500, 9300, 14000, 20600, 30800, 49000, 110000, 240000 and
390000. The peak molecular weights of the PEG standards were 62, 106,
238, 330, 425, 610, 1050 and 1500.
To obtain the calibration curve, standard solutions were prepared from
O.lg of a standard diluted to a total volume of 25m1 with THF. A
claibration standard could contain up to four individual standards so
long as each standard differed in Mp from all other standard in the
solution by a 10-fold factor. The calibration standards were filtered
through a 45 micron filter (commerically obtained from Phenomenex
Inc., Torrence, Calif.), the 100 microliters of the solution was
injected onto the columns and a chromatogram obtained. A calibration
curve of elution time vs. log molecular weight using a narrow standard
calibration and third order fit was obtained with the Waters Model 840
software, version 6.2.
The samples to be analyzed were prepared by placing O.lg of the sample
in a 25m1 volumetric flask and diluting with TNF. After filtration
through the 45 micron filter, 100 microliters was injected onto the
colums and a chromatogram obtained. The Mw, Mn and Mw/Mn were
obtained relative to the above-described calibration curve using the
Waters Model 840 software.
The polyurethane polyol A had an Mn of 1760, Mw of 2994 and degree of
dispersion'of 1.70.
CA 02020988 2001-O1-25
Polyurethane Polyols B-E
Polyurethane polyols B-E were produced in a similar manner to polyurethane
polyol A, from the components as set forth in Table I.
5
TABLEI
Polyurethane
Polyol
B C D E
Reactants _ (~rams~ rams rams rams
2-ethyl-1,3-hexane 876.0 876.0 499.4 930.0
diol
Methyl propyl ketone415.0 150.0 187.4 110.0
Dibutyltin dilaurate0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2
Methylene-bis(cyclohexyl 786.0 ----- ----- -----
isocyanate) 1
Isocyanurate of 1,6-hexane ----- 1164.0 ----- -----
diisocyanate~
Isocyanurate of 1,6-hexane ----- ----- 624.9 ~-----
diisocyanate~
Biuret of 1,6-hexane ----- ----- ----- 1624.0
diisocyanate4
Methyl propyl ketone ----- 360.0 187.4 200.0
1 = commercially available under the trade designation Desmodur W from
Mobay Chemical.
10 2 = eq. weight 181, commercially available under the trade-mark
Tolonate HDT from Phone-Poulenc.
3 = eq. weight 216 at 90°ro non-volatiles, commercially available under
the
trade-mark Desmodur N-3300LV from Mobay Chemical.
4 = commercially available under the trade-mark Desmodur N-75 from
15 Mobay Chemical.
a~ ~~ i,)
!~J i i' r n ~~,.:' r..~' ii ~ ~i~
ACO 5504 US2
16
The diol, methyl propyl ketone and dibutyltin dilaurate were charged
to a 5 liter flask and the mixture heated to 60°C. The isocyanate and
additional methyl propyl ketone were then added to the flask over a
period of 1-2 hours. After the addition, the reaction mixture was
held at approximately 70°C until no isocyanate was detected by FTIR,
generally from 0.5 to 2 hours.
The properties of the resulting polyurethane polyols B-E and solutions
are reported in Table II.
TABLE II
Polyurethane Polyol
Property B C D E
Solutions
Non-volatile % 78.0 78.1 71.1 75.7
Brookfield viscosity (cps) 4000 3500 1680 4000
Polyols
OH number (mg KOH/g) 202 168 170 165
Mn 687 1844 1613 2050
Mw 876 3594 2580 5020
Degree of dispersion (Mw/Mn) 1.28 1.95 1.60 2.45
(II) Formulation of Clear Coatings
Examples 1-2 and Comparative Examples 1-3
The polyurethane polyol A solution was utilized to formulate melamine
crosslinked clear coatings at 30% (Example 1) and 45% (Example 2) by
~~"~,~~'~jq~~~l'~~>
d .~ F.~ K e:
ACO 5504 US2
17
weight of a hexamethoxymethyl melamine ("HM~1M") (commercially
available under the trade designation Cymel 303 from American
Cyanamid), based upon total resin solids.
For the sake of comparison, high solids, one pack coatings based upon
a typical hydroxy functional polyacrylate were also formulated with
30% (Comparative Example 1) and 45% (Comparative Example 2) by weight
levels of the HMMM crosslinker.
These examples were catalyzed with an amine blocked dodecylbenzene
sulfonic acid catalyst (commercially available under the trade
designation Na~ure 5226 from King Industries) at 0.380 active catalyst
based upon resin solids.
Generally speaking, the aforementioned hydroxy functional polyacrylate
can be characterized as a standard commercial system produced from
combinations of methyl methacrylate, butyl or ethyl acrylate, styrene,
hydroxyethyl or hydroxypropyl acrylate or methacrylate, lactone-
modified hydroxyethyl acrylate and traces of acrylic or methacrylic
2U acid. The Mw of such standard polyacrylate polyol can range from 4000
to 10000, the Mn from 2000 to 5000, the degree of dispersion from 2 to
4.5, the hydroxy equivalent weight from 330 to 560 (corresponding to
OH numbers ranging from 100 to 170), the acid number from 0 to 25, and
the glass transition temperature (Tg) from -5°C to 20°C.
Additionally tested was a high solids, two-pack coating based upon
this same hydroxy functional acrylate and, as crosslinker, the iso-
cyanurate of 1,6-hexane diisocyanate (commerically available under the
trade designation Desmodur N-3390 from Mobay Chemical) (Comparative
Example 3).
All samples were reduced to 60% non-volatiles by addition of butyl
acetate, and then drawn down at 1.5-1.8 mils dry film thickness on
za ~, lr: f:l
.r a ~ ~.! ~' t:f ~!3
ACO 5504 US2
a
18
aluminum test panels. The coatings were cured for 30 minutes at about
120°C (250°F).
The so-produced coatings were tested for acid etch resistance by
application of a simulated acid rain solution formulated by mixing 1
normal aqueous solutions of sulfuric, nitric and hydrochloric acids at
a volume ratio of 65/30/5, the resulting solution having a pH of 0.2.
Each panel was spotted with 0.5 ml of the above simulated acid rain
solution and left~standing uncovered at room temperature. Evaporated
acid rain solution was replaced with additional solution at regular
intervals (2 hours) sn that the spot size remained the same throughout
testing. At the end of the exposure time, the panel was rinsed with
distilled water and allowed to dry overnight. The panels were
inspected for damage the following day. The exposure times required
to damage the various coatings are reported below in Table III.
TABLE III
2U
Melamine Hours to Hours to
Exa- mple Level First Spot Film Degradation
C1 30% 4 Not degraded
after
7 hours
C2 45% 2 4
1 30% No spot after-----
' ~ 7 hours
2 . 45% No spot after-----
7 hours
3 --- No spot after-----
7 hours
d ~ bi ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~)
':.. ~~ io ~~~ ~ s!
ACO 5504 US2
19
These results suggest that a significant improvement in acid etch
resistance was obtained by replacement of a standard acrylic polyol
with a polyurethane polyol in accordance with the present invention.
Further, the melamine crosslinked coatings based upon the polyurethane
polyols in accordance with the present invention displayed acid etch
resistance approaching that of a two-component acrylic urethane system
known for its acid resistance.
Examples 3-7 and Comparative Examples 4-5
Polyurethane polyols A and D were formulated into melamine crosslinked
clearcoats suitable for wet-on-wet application by spray over high
solids, pigmented, melamine crosslinked basecoats. The basecoats and
clearcoats were applied in two passes, with a 5-10 minute flash-off
between applications.
Two melamine crosslinkers were evaluated at two different levels for
each polyurethane palyol - an HMMM (commerically available under the
trade designation Cymel 303 from American Cyanamiri) at 30% (Example 3)
and 40% (Examples 4 and 5) based upon resin solids, and a methylated-
butylated mixed ether melamine ("MEMM") (commercially available under
the trade designation Cymel 1135 from American Cyanamid) at 40%
(Examples 6 and 7) based upon resin solids.
The acid catalyst utilized was the same as for Examp1es 1-2, at simi-
lar levels. Additionally, a flow additive was added to adjust the
wetting properties of the clearcoats.
These clearcoats were applied wet-on-wet over the above-mentioned
pigmented basecoat~in two passes, with a 5-10 minute flash off between
passes, on 20 gauge phosphated steel and cured for 30 minutes at 120°C
(250°F). The dry film thickness of the cured clearcoats was approxi-
mately 1.6 mils.
ii vvi' ~s
ACO 5504 US2
These coatings were tested for acid etch resistance as described earli
for Examples 1-2. Two panels coated with automobile industry (OEM)
standard melamine crosslinked basecoat/clearcoat systems were utilized
for comparison (Comparative Examples 4 and 5). The results are pre-
y sented below in Table IV.
TABLE IV
10 PolyurethaneMelamine Melamine Hours to
Example Polyol Type Level First Spot
3 A HMMM 30% 12
4 A HMMM 40% 11
15 5 D HMMM 40% 10
6 A MEMM 40% 11
7 D MEMM 40% 12
C4 4
C5 5
Example 8
A one-pack clearcoat was formulated from the following components,
which were blended utilizing equipment and techniques conmonly uti-
lized in the coatings industry:
164 parts by weight of the polyurethane polyol D solution,
74 parts by weight of an HMMM (commerically available under the
trade designation Cymel 303 from American Cyanamid),
1.4 parts by weight of a blocked acid catalyst (commerically
available under the trade designation Nacure 5226 from
King Industries) and
72 parts by weight of methyl amyl ketone.
~dl.~~rvn~ri ~j~~
ACO 5504 US2
21
The clearcoat was applied wet-on-wet over a waterborne basecoat, in a
manner described above, using air atomized hand spray guns. After
application, the system was cured by baking in an oven for a period of
about 30 minutes at about 120°C (250°F). The resulting clearcoat
thickness was about 1.6 mils.
The cured film properties of the clearcoat were measured as follows:
hardness was about 15 knoops (as measured by a Tukon Tester); gloss
was about 88 at 20° (as measured by a BYK-Mallincroft Meter); and
distinctness of image was about 92 units (as measured by a Model 1792
DOI Meter supplied by A.T.I. Systems).
Acid etch resistance was tested as in Examples 1-2 at ambient tem
perature (about 20°C). No visible effect of the acid exposure was
observed until after 10 hours.
Such excellent acid resistance must be considered unexpected in view
of the fact that the typical commercial, one-pack, high solids, auto-
motive, acrylic clearcoat, applied and tested under the same con-
ditions, was visibly affected after just 3-4 hours.
Similar excellent acid resistance results were observed when the above
polyurethane polyol based clearcoat was similarly applied over typi-
cal, commercial, high solids, automotive, one-pack and two-pack acry-
lic basecoats.
(III) Formulation of Pigmented Coatings
Exam le 9
A single layer pigmented top coat was prepared as follows.
Into a mixing vessel were placed 150 parts by weight of the
polyurethane polyol D solution, to which'was added 183 parts by weight
CA 02020988 2001-O1-25
22
of a titanium dioxide pigment (commercially available under the trade-mark
Titanox 2160 from NL Chemicals). These components were blended using high
speed dispersion equipment.
S After dispersion of the pigment, the following were added:
106 parts by weight of the HMMM crosslinker of Example 8,
53 parts by weight butyl acetate,
12 parts by weight of the blocked acid catalyst of Example 8,
96 parts by weight of methyl amyl ketone and
150 additional parts by weight of the polyurethane polyol D solution.
The non-volatile content of the so-produced coating was 65.0% by weight.
The topcoat was applied to 20 gauge phosphated steel test panels and cured as
in
Example 8, resulting in a cured coating layer thickness of 2.0 mils.
The cured film properties were measured as in Example 8: hardness was about
14 knoops; gloss was about 87; and distinctness of image was about 80 units.
Acid etch resistance was tested as in Examples 1-2 at ambient temperature
(about 20°C). No visible effect of the acid exposure was observed until
after
7 hours.
Again such excellent acid resistance must be considered unexpected in view of
the fact that typical acrylic, high solids, one-pack automotive topcoats with
about the same pigment cantent (i.e., the same hiding power), applied and
tested
under the same conditions, were visibly affected after just 2 hours.
Only a limited number of preferred embodiments of the present
invention have been described above. One skilled in the art, however, will
,~~~~~r~<>~~>y
iet~,.~~J :>~4~~
ACO 5501 US2
23
recognize numerous substitutions, modifications and alterations which
can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the inven-
tion as limited~by the following claims.
10
20
30
