Language selection

Search

Patent 2029752 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2029752
(54) English Title: DISTRIBUTED LAUNCHER NETWORK FOR ACTIVE RADAR MISSILES
(54) French Title: RESEAU DISTRIBUE DE COMMANDE DE TIR POUR MISSILES ACTIFS TELEGUIDES PAR RADAR
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F41G 7/30 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PEOPLES, JOHN R. (United States of America)
  • MCCAMEN, BROCK G. (United States of America)
  • YATES, WILLIAM A. (United States of America)
  • STUBBS, DAVID W. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1990-11-13
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-06-08
Examination requested: 1990-11-13
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
447,293 (United States of America) 1989-12-07

Abstracts

English Abstract


DISTRIBUTED LAUNCHER NETWORK
FOR ACTIVE RADAR MISSILES
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A distributed launcher network (10) is modular
in design, employing components which are easily added or
subtracted as required by the size and number of the
geographical areas to be covered. It employs one or more
target sensors (12a-c) which collect target position
information and feed it into a target data net (14). The
target data net (14) integrates the target position
information from the target sensors (12a-c) to form a
summary of multiple target activity. One or more fire
control centers (16a-b) are plugged into the target data
net (14) receiving target position information. The fire
control centers (16a-b) issue launch control orders to one
or more airborne vehicles (20-a-e) through launchers
(18a-e) assigned to their control. After launch, the fire
control centers (16a-b) transmit updated target position
information to the airborne vehicles (20a-e) under the
control.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
What is Claimed is:
1. An apparatus for controlling at least one
airborne vehicle, said apparatus comprising:
(a) at least one control means for
controlling the launch and flight of
at least one of said airborne
vehicles; and
(b) at least one launcher communicating
with the control means but spaced
therefrom a sufficient distance such
that distruction of the control means
would not destroy the launcher.
2. The apparatus of Claim 1, further
comprising:
(c) at least one target position sensor
communicating with said control means
but spaced therefrom a sufficient
distance such that destruction of the
target position sensor would not
destroy the launcher.
3. The apparatus of Claim 2, further
comprising:
(d) at least one integrating means for
combining the target position
information from each target position
sensor for use by said control means,
said integrating means being spaced
therefrom a sufficient distance such
that destruction of the target
position sensor would not destroy the
integrating means.

4. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said
control means comprises at least one fire control center.
5. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said
integrating means comprises at least one tactical data
net.
6. The apparatus of Claim 3, which is modular
in construction and includes a plurality of target
position sensors, integrating means, control means, and
launchers.
7. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said
airborne vehicle is a missile.
8. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said
launchers are geographically distributed, being spread out
to maximize area coverage.
9. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said
launchers have a 360° azimuth capability.
10. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said
launchers include a guidance means for transmitting
updated target position information to said airborne
vehicles.
11. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said
control means includes means for communicating with each
of said launchers, said communications means being capable
of receiving launcher and airborne vehicle status
information and issuing control orders to said launcher
and airborne vehicle.

12. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said
target position sensors are geographically distributed,
being spread out to maximize surveillance area.
13. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said
target position sensors are capable of generating
three-dimensional target position information.

14. An apparatus for controlling at least one
airborne vehicle said apparatus comprising:
(a) at least one control means for
controlling the launch of at least one
of said airborne vehicles;
(b) at least one launcher, said launchers
being geographically distributed to
maximize area coverage, said launchers
having a 360° azimuth capability, and
said launchers including a guidance
means for transmitting updated target
position information to said airborne
vehicle after launch;
(c) at least one target position sensor;
said target position sensors being
geographically distributed, being
spread out to maximize surveillance
area, said target position sensors
being capable of generating
three-dimensional target position
information; and
(d) integrating means for combining the
target position information from the
target position sensors for use by
said control means.
15. The apparatus of Claim 14 which is modular
in construction and includes a plurality of target
position sensors, integrating means, control means, and
launchers.

16. A method for controlling at least one
airborne vehicle, said airborne vehicle being a part of a
distributed launcher network comprising at least one
target sensor, at least one launcher, and at least one
controlling means for controlling the launch and flight of
said airborne vehicle, said controlling means having a
communications means for communicating with said launcher
and said airborne vehicle, said method comprising:
(a) receiving target position information
from at least one target sensor;
(b) combining target position information
into a summary of multi-target
activity for use by at least one of
said controlling means;
(c) sending updated position information
and launch and control orders using
said communications means to at least
one of said launchers and airborne
vehicles; and
(d) sending updated position information
using said communications means to
said airborne vehicle after launch.
17. The method of Claim 16 wherein said
airborne vehicle is a missile.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~297~2
DISTRIBUTED LAUNCHER_NETWORK FOR ACTIVE RADAR MISSILES
1 ~ACKGROUNE~OF~ NVENTION
1. Technical Field
The present invention rel~tes to missile systems
and ~ore speci~ically to ~ di~tributed launcher network.
5
2. D~iscussion
Traditional weapon sy~tems include a sensor, a
co~munications 6yste~, a weapon, a central processing
unit, ~nd a fire control computer. For example, a simple
weapon system might include the eyes of an observer as a
sensor, the pointing finger of the observer as a
co~munications ~ystem, a rifle as a weapon, an~ the
operator96 brain s a central procassing uni~ and fire
control co~putar. A compl~x weapon system ~ight include a
radar syste~ :as a sensor, a set of radio frequency
transceivers as a co~munication system, a missile as the
weapon, and a central processing unit and fire control
comput~r as them~elves. No matter how complex,
traditional weapon &yst~ms ar~ located and operated
independently o~ oach other, ~side ~rom a mutual sharing
of sensor information.
In today's mult~-threat env~ronment, traditional
weapon ~ystems ~re archaic. Tech~ical development-~ in
weapon~y have reduced the time wlthin ~hich to receive and
. 25 analyze information . When traditional weapon sy~tems are
employed, ~a central command authori~y has ~ifficulty
controlling each weapon ~y~t~3. Because the co~ponents of
the traditional ystem~ are located together, these
.
.

systems are easily destroyed. Furthermore, a fixed number
of traditional weapon systems can only cover a limited
geographical area.
In accordance with the teachings o~ the present
invention, a distributed launch~r ~etwork ls provided.
The network ls ~odular in design, employing co~ponents
which are easily added or 6ubtracted as reguired by the
size and number of geographical areas to b~ covered. It
employs one or more target ~ensors which collect target
position infor~ation ~nd feed it into a target data net.
The target data net integrates t~e target position
im~ormation from each targ~t 6ensor to ~orm a summary of
~ultiple target activity. One or more fire control
centers ~re plugged into th~ target data net for receiving
target position information. E~ch fire control center
issues launch and control orders to one or more airborne
vehicles through launchers assigned to its control. In
the pr~ferred embodiment, the irborne ~ehicle is the
Advanced Medi~m Range Air-to~Air Missile ~AMRAAM), an
air-to-air missile used in a ~urface~to-air mode. A~ter
launch, th~ fire control centers trans~it updated target
po~ition informat~on to th~ airborne vehicles under their
control.
Other aspect~ o~ this invention are as follows:
~ n ~pparatus for controlling at least one
airborne vehicle, ~aid apparatus compri~ing:
(a) at least one csntrol ~eans for
controlling the launch and flight of
at least one of said airborne
vehicles: and
~b) at least one launcher communicating
with the control means but spaced
therefrom a cuf~icient distance such
that distruction of the control means
would not destroy the launch~r. :~:
- , ~ - ~ , : . ,

2a
An apparatus for controlling ~t laa~t one
airborne vehicle said apparatus compri6ing:
(a) at least one control ~eans ~or
controliing the launch uf at least one
o~ ~aid air~orne vehicles:
(b~ at lea~t one launcher, ~aid launchers
being geogr~phically di~tributed to
~axi~izQ ~rea coverage~ aid launchers
having a 360~ azi~uth eapabillty, and
R~ ld launcher~ including a guidance
~eans ~or transmitting updated target
po~ition in~or~ation to said airborne
vehicle after launch;
(c) at l~ast one target position sensor, :
said target positiDn sensors being
geographically distxibuted, being
spread out to maximiz~ surveillance
area, said target position sensors
being capable of generating
thxee-dimensional target position
infor~ation; and
(d) integrating ~eans for combining the
targ~t po~ition informa~ion from the
target position ~ensors for use by
said control means.
A method for controlling at least one
airborne vehicle, ~aid airborne vehicl~ bQing a part o~ a
distribute~ launcher network compri~in~ at least one
target 6en~0r, at ïeast one launcher, and at least one
controlling Dleans for controlling ~he launch and flight o~
6~id ~irborne vehicî~, ~aid controlling ~eans having a
co~munications.m2ans ~or co~municating with ~aid launcher
and said ~irborne ~rehicle, ~aid 3~ thod compri~ing:
~a) receiving target po~ition information
~ro~ ~t least one targ~t ~ensor: :
. . ... .
- - - .
,. , '' ': ' : : , ~ : .
.

2b
th) combinin~ target po~ition information
into a summary of multi-target
activity ~or u~e by ~t leas~ one of
~aid controlling means;
(c) 6ending updated position information
and launch and control orders using
~aid co~munications ~eans to at least
one of ~aid launchers and ~irborne
vehicles; and
~d) sending updated position information
using said communications means ~o
~aid airborne vehicle after launch.
~R~Y ~5CRIPTION OF ~HE ~Ba~I~2
Other object~ and advantages o~ ~he invention
will become apparent upon reading the ~ollowing detailed
~escription and upon reference to the ~ollowing drawing in
which:
FIG. 1 is a ~che~atic diagram ~howing the basic ~.
co~ponents of the di~tributed launcher networX~ ~
:- : .: . . .: .

3 2fD297~
1 ~ETAILED DESC~ ION OF T~E ~ RRED EMBODIMENT~
Turning now to FIG. 1 the distributed launcher
network 10 ie con~tructed in a ~odular ~a~hion. To the
left ~ide of the diagram, one or ~ore taryet 6ensors 12a-c
obtain target po6ition in~ormation. Although thr~e target
~ensors are ~hown for clarity, target ~ensor~ can be added
or subtracted depending upon the ~iz~ of ths geographical
area to be ~urveyed. One for~ of target ~ensor envisioned
by this invention i~ a three-dimen~ional radar ~ystem.
The target ~ensor~ 12a c are ~dvantageously placed in
optimal surveillance location~, ~way from other networX
omponent6, ~nd are operated independently of each other.
Target po~ition information ~rom the target
sensors 12a-c is ~ed into ~ target data net 14. The
15 target data net 14 combines the tarqet position
information from each target 6ensor 12 to form an
integrated picture of target activity. Although only one
target data net is s~own ~or clarity, more target data
nets can be added depending on the number of geographical
areas to be surveyed.
The integrated target position information is
available for use by the fire control c~nters 16a b. Only
two fire control centers 16a-~ are ~hown; hvwever, in
keeping with the modular nature of the system, fire
control cen~ers may be added or subtracted as required by
the tactical ~ituation. The ~ire conkrol centers 16a-b
are ~ssigned a ~pecific geograph~cal area of
responsibility. Fire control cent~r operators monitor
~heir areas of respon6ibility ~nd ~end launch and control
order~ to their assigned launchers 18a-e.
The location of ~he launcher~ 18a-e is recorded
on a grid system. A common reference, ~rom which angular
course direction i~ measured, is al80 noted on the grid
system. The launchers 18a-e are programmed to receive
control orders referenced to the~r own posi~ion on the
grid ~ystem. ~h~refore, t~rget posi~ion information is
~- .' . ' ' ` ;

4 2~297~2
1 converted into launcher co~rdinates be~ore being used to
generate a launch message. The launchers 18a-e and
airborne vPhicles 20a-e receive launch ~nd control orders
via a ~ecure communications link. After launch, the
airborne vehicles 20a-e continue to receive updated
targeting information via the ~ecure communications link.
In th~ preferred iQ~bodi~ent, the airborne
vehicles 20a-e are the Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air
Missile ~MR~M). This missile i~ ~daptable for use in
other environ~ents besides air-to-air. In ~he preferred
embodiment of the distributed launcher network lo, it is
being deployed as a 6ur~ace-to-air missile. Other
embodiments envision use of the missile in a co~bination
o~ environment~. Any l~unching platform capable of
communicating with the ~ire control centers 16a-b can
become part of th~ distributed launcher network lo.
The present invention has several advantages
over the prior ar~- which are readily apparent to one
skilled in the art. The invention gives battlefield
2~ commanders the flexibility of placing the target se~sors
12a c in opti~al Eurveillance locationis and the launchers
18a-e in optimaI locations for defending tactical
positionis. The number of launchers 18a-e and target
sensors 12a-c is variable and launcher assignments can be
changed fro~ one fire control center 16 to ano~her. The
dashed and 601id lines between the fire control centers
16a-b and the launchers 20a-e re~lect this
interchangeability. ~hus, th~ relative ~ize and ~ire
power o~ the network 10 is discretionary and permits
~ontinual ~djust~ent ~s ~:actical condition~ vary.
The distributed launcher network 10 i~ less
vulnerable to destruction than traditional weapon systems.
Locating the launchers 18a-e remotely from the target
sensors 12a e makes them far less vulnerable to
destruction by a weapon which is attracted by tile presence
of an emitting target 6ensor. Due to the distri~uted :~
~ .
- , . . . . . . . . ... . .
.: . . . . .
. . .
. . ' ,, . ~ ~ : i ,,
-.,

5 20297~t~ :
1 nature of the network 10 the launcher~ 12a-e are ~uch less
likely to b~ ~potted by aerial reconnaissance; there is
much less heavy ~quipment assembled in the ~ame location.
Because it is less vulnerable to destruction, it provides
a grea~er defense o~ a given area than a traditional
weapon ~ystem.
Finally, t~e distrlbuted launcher network 10 has
other advantages. It ha~ bettar freedom o~ movement than
a traditional weapon 6ystem. Instead of shutting down the
entire launcher battexy and loosing all apability d~ring
tactical movement different modules ~ay be unplugged and
moved independently lea~ing the rest of the system
operational. The invention also provides better
coordination of fire power. ~ultiple simultaneous
15 launches airborne vehicles to defend against enemy wave
raids is possible. Each launcher has a full 360 azimuth
capability.
Although the invention has been described with
particular reference to certain preferred embodiments
thereof, variations and ~odifications can be effected
within the spirit and ~cope of the following claims.
,
,
,

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2024-01-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1997-11-13
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1997-11-13
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1996-11-13
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1991-06-08
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1990-11-13
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1990-11-13

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1996-11-13
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
BROCK G. MCCAMEN
DAVID W. STUBBS
JOHN R. PEOPLES
WILLIAM A. YATES
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1991-06-07 1 35
Claims 1991-06-07 5 147
Drawings 1991-06-07 1 27
Cover Page 1991-06-07 1 26
Descriptions 1991-06-07 7 310
Representative drawing 1999-07-04 1 18
Fees 1995-10-16 1 56
Fees 1994-10-30 2 122
Fees 1992-10-27 1 17
Fees 1993-10-20 1 42