Language selection

Search

Patent 2035489 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2035489
(54) English Title: SIGNALLING INTERFERENCE PROTECTION
(54) French Title: PROTECTION CONTRE LES PARASITES DE SIGNALISATION
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H04W 16/02 (2009.01)
  • H04B 7/26 (2006.01)
  • H04W 16/24 (2009.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • LONGSHORE, THEODORE F. (United States of America)
  • DECLERCK, WILLIAM PAUL (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • MOTOROLA, INC.
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1999-09-07
(22) Filed Date: 1991-02-01
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1992-08-02
Examination requested: 1991-02-01
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


There is provided a mechanism for signalling interference protection
comprising: transmitting, along with adjacent channel frequencies, an
odd/even bit associated with odd/even channels that differentiates
adjacent channel frequencies from one another, receiving transmitted an
odd/even bit associated with odd/even channels that differentiates
adjacent channel frequencies from one another, and responding to
~(s) of interest while remaining unresponsive to other than that of
~ St.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-7-
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. In a channel reuse radio network, a method of signalling interference
protection, the method comprising the steps of:
transmitting signalling information in a desired voice channel and an
interfering voice channel which is adjacent to the desired voice channel, each
voice channel being utilized within a reuse pattern, the signalling
information
differentiating the desired voice channel and the interfering voice channel
from
one another,
receiving that transmitted differentiating information,
and responding only to the desired voice channel based on the
differentiating information.
2. In a channel reuse radio network, a method of signalling interference
protection, the method comprising the steps of:
receiving information transmitted in a desired voice channel and in an
interfering voice channel which is adjacent to the desired voice channel, the
transmitted information differentiating the desired voice channel from the
interfering voice channel, each voice channel utilized within a reuse pattern,
and responding only to transmissions of the desired voice channel based
on the differentiating information.
3. In a channel reuse radio network, a method of signalling interference
protection, the method comprising the steps of:
providing information in a desired voice channel and an interfering voice
channel which is adjacent to the desired voice channel, the information
differentiating the interfering voice channel from the desired voice channel,
and transmitting, within a reuse pattern and in at least the interfering
voice channel, the information differentiating the interfering voice channel
from
the desired voice channel.

-8-
4. In a channel reuse radio network, a method of signalling interference
protection, the method comprising the steps of:
differentiating, within a reuse pattern, between a desired voice channel
and an interfering voice channel which is adjacent to the desired voice
channel,
and responding to the desired voice channel while remaining
unresponsive to the interfering voice channel based on the differentiation.
5. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1-4, wherein the interfering
voice channel comprises a voice channel having a frequency adjacent to the
frequency of the desired voice channel.
6. In a channel reuse radio network, a method of adjacent voice channel
interference protection, the method comprising the steps of:
transmitting, in adjacent voice channels, an odd/even bit associated with
odd/even voice channels that differentiates adjacent voice channels from one
another,
receiving the transmitted odd/even bit associated with odd/even voice
channels differentiating adjacent voice channels from one another,
and responding only to a desired one of the adjacent voice channels
based on the odd/even bit associated with the desired adjacent voice channel.
7. In a channel reuse radio network, a method of adjacent voice channel
interference protection, the method comprising the steps of:
transmitting, in voice channels having adjacent frequencies, an odd/even
bit associated with odd/even frequencies that differentiates adjacent voice
channel frequencies from one another,
receiving the transmitted odd/even bit associated with odd/even
frequencies differentiating adjacent voice channel frequencies from one
another,
and responding only to a voice channel as a desired frequency based on
the odd/even bit associated with the voice channel at the desired frequency.

-9-
8. An apparatus for providing adjacent voice channel interference
protection in a channel reuse radio network, comprising, operatively coupled
in
series:
means for transmitting, in adjacent voice channels, an odd/even bit
associated with odd/even voice channel that differentiates adjacent voice
channels from one another,
means for receiving the transmitted odd/even bit associated with
odd/even voice channels differentiating adjacent voice channels from one
another,
and means for responding only to a desired one of the adjacent voice
channels based on the odd/even bit associated with the desired adjacent voice
channel.
9. An apparatus for providing adjacent voice channel interference
protection in a channel reuse radio network, comprising, operatively coupled
in
series:
means for transmitting, in voice channels having adjacent frequencies,
an odd/even bit associated with odd/even frequencies that differentiates
adjacent
voice channel frequencies from one another,
means for receiving the transmitted odd/even bit associated with
odd/even frequencies differentiating adjacent voice channel frequencies from
one another,
and means for responding only to a voice channel as a desired frequency
based on the add/even bit associated with the voice channel at the desired
frequency.

-10-
10. In a channel reuse radio network, a method of signalling interference
protection, the method comprising the steps of:
transmitting, in odd/even voice channels which are adjacent to each
other, an odd/even bit associated with the odd/even voice channels that
differentiates the odd voice channel and the adjacent even voice channel from
one another,
receiving the transmitted odd/even bit associated with the odd/even voice
channels differentiating the odd and even voice channels from one another,
and responding to a desired one of the odd or even voice channels based
on reception of the odd/even bit associated therewith.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the step of responding further
comprises the steps of responding to an odd voice channel upon reception of an
odd bit and rejecting adjacent even voice channels based on their associated
even bits, and vice versa.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2~~~~~~
-1-
SIGNALLING INTERFERENCE PROTECTION
This invention is concerned with signalling interterence protection.
More particularly, this invention is concerned with signalling interference
protection in a (cellular radiotelephone) channel reuse network.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In systems employing channel reuse schemes, it is a common problem to
determine whether one is using the channel intended or an unintended
reuse of that channel. In cellular radiotelephone systems exhibiting
geographical frequency reuse, the problem is worse because cellular
radiotelephones are not fully capable of rejecting not only the same
frequency reused at the geographic separation distance, but also
insufficiently capable of rejecting adjacent frequencies within the reuse
perimeter.
US Patent No. 4,128,740 to Graziano, assigned in the instant assignee,
is useful to demonstrate the point. Figure 4 of Graziano (substantially
reproduced here as Figure 1 ) illustrates a conventional cellular
frequency reuse plan common known as the seven-cell repeat pattern. It
consists of a central cell (1 ) ringed in a clockwise direction beginning at
3-o'clock by six ring cells (2-7), completing a seven-cell pattern. That
seven-cell pattern is then itself surrounded by six other identical seven-
cell patterns. Thus, the frequencies operating in each cell are
geographically reused at a geographical reuse separation distance. It is
CE02025R - 1 - 11 /29/89

W. ~~~~~~g~
-2-
this geographical frequency reuse that provides the (frequency) channel
capacity to allow a large number of radiotelephone users to share a
limited amount of (frequency) spectnrm. However, the neat geographical
reuse separation illustrated is not quite so neat when local propagation
conditions such as antenna height, buildings and obstructions) etc.) are
taken into account. Accordingly) additional protection is provided against
co-channel (same frequency) interference in the signalling by allocating
seven differentiating codes to each of the surrounding patterns. This
signalling provides some protection in that a radiotelephone is able to
differentiate the frequency on which he is speaking from an interferer of
the same frequency at the reuse separation distance but having a
different code. In conventional analog cellular systems, these codes are
Supervisory Audio Tones (SAT) and in proposed narrower band, split-
channel systems, known as Digital SAT or DSAT.
The problem solved by the instant invention is that there is insufficient
rejection in radiotelephones to fully reject adjacent channels just one
frequency above or below the one of interest.
In his patent (US 4,128,740), Graziano teaches that greater frequency
reuse (and therefore spectrum utilization) can be obtained with narrow
beam, sectored antennas. The resulting four-cell pattern is still
surrounded by six reuses of that same four cell pattern, advantageously
employing seven DSATs for improved signalling protection against co-
channel interterence. Figure 9 of Graziano (substantially reproduced
here as Figure 2) illustrates a frequency plan for his "four-cell" pattern. It
illustrates how 208 frequency channels are divided among 4 cells) each
having 6 sectors, for a total of 24 sectors (CS1-CS24). Thus, each sector
has one supervisory frequency (S1-S24) and either 7 or 8 voice
frequency channels, allowing that many simultaneous conversations in
each sector. The problem is that, although any given frequency being
used in Sector 3 of a first pattern can be differentiated from that same co-
channel frequency in Sector 3 of the pattern behind it by its DSAT, there
is no protection for a radiotelephone user in Sector 3 using frequency
196 from the next higher adjacent frequency 197 directly behind it in
CE02025R - 2 - 11 /29/89

.. IUN - 6 1994
2035489
-3-
Sector 4, or from the next lower adjacent frequency 195 in Sector 2
behind and to the side of it.
This invention takes as its object to overcome these shortcomings and
to realize certain advantages presented below.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
There is provided a method of signalling interference protection
comprising: transmitting, in a desired channel and an interfering channel
each within a reuse pattern, signalling information that differentiates the
desired channel and the interfering channel from one another, receiving
that transmitted differentiating information, and responding to the
desired channel while remaining unresponsive to the interfering channel
based on the differentiating information.
In addition, there is provided an apparatus for signalling interference
protection in a channel reuse radio network, comprising, operatively
coupled in series: means, in a desired channel or an interfering channel
within a reuse pattern, for transmitting signalling information that
differentiates the desired channel from interfering channels within the
reuse pattern, means for receiving that transmitted differentiating
information, and means for responding to the desired channel while
remaining unresponsive to the interfering channel based on the
differentiating information.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Additional objects, features and advantages of the invention will be
more clearly understood and the best mode contemplated for practicing
it in its preferred embodiment will be appreciated (by way of unrestricted
example) from the following detailed description, taken together with the
accompanying drawings in which:

_ UUN-6199 2~35~t89
- 3(a) -
Figure 1 is a cellular geographical reuse diagram which is a substantial
reproduction of Figure 4 of US Patent No. 4,128,740 to Graziano,
assigned in the instant assignee.
Figure 2 is a cellular frequency reuse plan which is a substantial
reproduction of Figure 9 of US Patent No. 4,128,740 to Graziano,
assigned in the instant assignee.

~0 35 ~ ss
Figure 3 is a cellular geographical reuse diagram and cellular frequency
reuse plan of the network in which the invention operates in accordance
with the preferred embodiment.
Figure 3 is a cellular geographical reuse diagram and cellular frequency
reuse plan of the network in which the invention operates in accordance
with the preferred embodiment.
Once again) the problem illustrated in Figure 3 is that, although any
given frequency being used in Sector 3 of a first pattern of a mobile
radiotelephone subscriber can be differentiated from that same co-
channel frequency in Sector 3 of the pattern behind it by its DSAT, there
is no protection for a radiotelephone user in Sector 3 using frequency
196 from the next higher adjacent frequency 197 directly behind it in
Sector 4, or from the next lower adjacent frequency 195 in Sector 2
behind and to the side of it: Present systems simply do not provide
protection against the most likely source of interference) an adjacent
channel within its own pattern.
The instant invention provides a solution to the problem by utilizing the
signalling to provide additional interference protection, not from co-
channel (same frequency) interferences at the geographic reuse separation
distance but from adjacent channels within the same pattern. It provides
that radiotelephone receivers (and base cell site equipment) reject
adjacent interferers on the basis of evenness and oddness of the
frequency. For example) if a mobile radiotelephone subscriber in
Sector 3 is assigned nominal channel frequency 196 (actual frequency
abc.xyz MHz) - an "even" channel, his receiver would reject adjacent
channel frequency 197 (actually some 12.5, 15) 25 or 30 KHz higher) in
Sector 4 directly behind and channel frequency 195 (actually some
12.5, 15, 25 or 30 KHz below) in Sector 2 behind and to the side, based
upon their "oddness". This substantially reduces the possibility of a
CE02025R - 4 - 11 /29/89

-5-
receiver improperly acting upon a transmission intended for another on
an adjacent channel.
If "evenness" and "oddness" were not otherwise determinable (and
inherently associated with each carrier), a bit could be transmitted along
with each carrier frequency to indicate "evenness" and "oddness" as by
either setting or clearing that bit field. Similarly) if additional protection
from interferers were desired) a one-of-n state binary word could be
included in the signalling protocol for each of n partitions of the frequency
spectrum. However, the usual distance 5 BCH code provides sufficient
assurance that the single bit will be recoverable.
The attendant advantage of this invention clearly includes signalling
protection against adjacent channel interferers within the pattern in
addition to the usual SAT co-channel interference protection from outside
the pattern.
Thus, there has been provided a mechanism for signalling interterence
protection comprising: transmitting) along with adjacent channel
frequencies, an odd/even bit associated with odd/even channels that
differentiates adjacent channel frequencies from one another, receiving
transmitted an odd/even bit associated with odd/even channels that
differentiates adjacent channel frequencies from one another, and
responding to ones) of interest while remaining unresponsive to other
than that of interest.
It will be appreciated by those ordinarily skilled in the art that the means
for carrying out the invention are readily available and their operation
well understood. While the preferred embodiment of the invention has
been described and shown, it will be appreciated by those skilled in this
field that other variations and modifications of this invention may be
implemented. For example) "evenness" and "oddness" could be
determined from frequencies discrimination (channel spacing) or made
inherent to the channels through slight variations in the bit rates used on
"odd" versus "even" channels. Although the foregoing discussion has
included a discussion in terms of channel frequencies, the technique is
CE02025R - 5 - 11 /29/89

2~~~ ~$~9
-6-
equally applicable to other channel structures such as, time slot channels
or code division channels and the like.
These and all other variations and adaptations are expected to fall within
the ambit of the appended claims.
CE02025R - 6 - 11 /29/89

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2015-08-29
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2015-04-28
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-04-28
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-04-28
Inactive: IPC expired 2009-01-01
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2003-02-03
Letter Sent 2002-02-01
Inactive: Late MF processed 2000-04-04
Letter Sent 2000-02-01
Grant by Issuance 1999-09-07
Inactive: Cover page published 1999-09-06
Inactive: Final fee received 1999-06-01
Pre-grant 1999-06-01
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1999-03-16
Inactive: Office letter 1999-03-15
Inactive: Delete abandonment 1999-03-08
Notice of Allowance is Issued 1999-03-08
Inactive: Office letter 1999-03-08
Letter Sent 1999-03-08
Notice of Allowance is Issued 1999-03-08
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1999-02-22
Inactive: Reversal of dead status 1999-02-22
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1999-02-22
Inactive: Delete abandonment 1999-02-19
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1999-02-01
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1998-04-16
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 1998-04-09
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1992-08-02
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1991-02-01
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1991-02-01

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1999-02-01

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 1998-02-02 1997-12-31
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 1999-02-01 1998-12-22
Final fee - standard 1999-06-01
Reversal of deemed expiry 2000-02-01 2000-04-04
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - standard 2000-02-01 2000-04-04
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - standard 2001-02-01 2001-01-18
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1993-02-01
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MOTOROLA, INC.
Past Owners on Record
THEODORE F. LONGSHORE
WILLIAM PAUL DECLERCK
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1994-02-28 1 12
Claims 1994-02-28 5 118
Abstract 1994-02-28 1 14
Drawings 1994-02-28 3 118
Description 1994-02-28 6 201
Description 1994-06-06 7 217
Claims 1994-06-06 6 186
Description 1999-03-16 7 261
Claims 1999-03-16 4 148
Cover Page 1999-08-31 1 39
Representative drawing 1999-08-31 1 17
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 1999-03-08 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2000-02-29 1 178
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2000-04-13 1 171
Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-03-04 1 179
Fees 1994-04-05 2 148
Correspondence 1999-03-08 1 8
Correspondence 1999-02-12 3 122
Fees 1999-03-15 2 42
Correspondence 1999-06-01 1 27
Fees 1996-12-23 1 98
Fees 1996-01-09 1 94
Fees 1994-12-28 1 96
Fees 1993-12-24 1 102
Fees 1992-12-22 1 59
Prosecution correspondence 1991-02-01 2 173
Examiner Requisition 1995-03-02 2 72