Language selection

Search

Patent 2040484 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2040484
(54) English Title: FIBER OPTIC MEASURING DEVICE, RATE GYRO, NAVIGATION AND STABILIZATION SYSTEM, AND CURRENT SENSOR
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF DE MESURE A FIBRES OPTIQUES, GYROSCOPE, SYSTEME DE NAVIGATION ET DE STABILISATION ET DETECTEUR DE COURANT
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01C 19/72 (2006.01)
  • G01R 15/24 (2006.01)
  • G01R 19/15 (2006.01)
  • G01R 33/24 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • LEFEVRE, HERVE (France)
  • MARTIN, PHILIPPE (France)
(73) Owners :
  • IXSEA
(71) Applicants :
  • IXSEA (France)
(74) Agent: LAVERY, DE BILLY, LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2001-11-20
(22) Filed Date: 1991-04-15
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-10-18
Examination requested: 1997-10-08
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
90 04908 (France) 1990-04-17

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to a fiber optic
measuring device which can be used for example as a
rate gyro.
In this device the variation in a measured
parameter engenders a phase difference between two
waves. It comprises
- a light source,
- a SAGNAC ring interferometer (2),
- a detector (3),
- a phase modulator (4), and
- electronic means (7) comprising a processing
system (9) furnishing a signal which is a function of
the measured parameter and electronic means (12)
controlling the phase modulator (4). The control signal
far the modulator is the superposition of a first,
periodic gating, bias signal .PHI. b(t) with period 2~ and
amplitude .PHI. bm, and of a second, staircase, negative-
feedback signal .PHI. m(t) synchronized with .PHI. b(t), each
step of which has a duration equal to ~ or to one of
its sub-multiples, and an amplitude .PHI. s, which is a
function of the value of the measured parameter and
which falls back to zero when its amplitude exceeds a
predetermined value .PHI. mm, .PHI. bm and .PHI. mm being slaved to
2.PHI. bm + .PHI. mm = 2 n.pi. where n is an integer, the response
to the singular phase shift introduced during the fall-
back of the negative-feedback signal being for this
slaving and hence used to keep the gain of the
modulation chain constant.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
1. A fiber optic measuring device in which a variation in
a measured parameter engenders a phase difference
between two waves, comprising:
- a quasi-monochromatic light source producing a wave,
the wave propagating with a propagation time,
- a SAGNAC ring interferometer
in which two counter-propagating waves created by a splitting
device for splitting and recombining waves propagate, the
propagation time of the waves between their splitting and
their recombining being ~,
- a detector producing a signal,
- a phase modulator modulated by a control signal, and
- electronic means comprising a processing system
furnishing by demodulation a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter and a modulation chain having
electronic means controlling by negative feed-back the phase
modulator, wherein the control signal for the phase modulator
is the superposition of a first, periodic gating, bias signal
.PHI. b(t) with period 2~ and amplitude .PHI. bm, and of a second
staircase, negative-feedback signal .PHI. m(t) synchronized with
.PHI. b(t), each step of which has a duration equal to ~ or to one
of its submultiples, and an amplitude .PHI. s, which is a function
of the value of the measured parameter and which falls back
to zero when its amplitude exceeds a predetermined value
the fall back introducing a singular phase shift in the
device, the singular phase shift introduced during the fall-
back of the negative-feedback signal producing in the device
a response for slaving .PHI. bm and .PHI. mm to 2 .PHI. bm + .PHI. mm = 2n.pi.
where n is an integer and hence to keep gain of the
modulation chain constant.
2. The fiber optic measuring device as claimed in claim
1, wherein the electronic means negative-feedback control
the phase modulator as a function of the signal received from
the detector so that, on the one hand the variation in the
16

demodulated signal as a function of the phase difference in
the neighborhood of zero is approximately linear, and on the
other hand this phase difference is kept null, the
demodulated signal being an error signal, and furnishing by
exploiting the modulating signal, a signal which is a function
of the variation in the measured parameter, the electronic
means further comprising:
- a clock synchronizing all the components,
- an analog-digital converter intended to digitize the
signal produced by the detector, the analog-digital converter
being specified so that the analog value of its least
significant bit has a value less than or equal to the standard
deviation of the noise in the signal coming from the detector,
- a first digital processing system receiving a signal
from the analog-digital converter,
- a first servo-loop digital filter, fed by a signal leaving
the digital processing system, furnishing a signal
representing the measured parameter,
- a register receiving the signal leaving the servo-loop
digital filter and furnishing a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter for any desired external use,
- an accumulator fed by the signal leaving the register,
generating a negative-feedback signal from the measured
parameter, .PHI. m(t),
- a generator producing a bias signal .PHI. b (t),
- an adder comprising two inputs and one output, its
first input being fed by the signal which is a function of the
measured parameter produced by the register and the
accumulator, its second input being fed by the bias signal
.PHI. b(t),
- a first digital-analog converter fed by the output signal
from the adder and controlling the phase modulator via a gain
amplifier,
17

- a second digital processing system which produces
the difference between the signal sampled by the converter
before the fall-back and that sampled after,
- a second servo-loop integrating filter receiving the
signal issued from the second processing system, and
- a second analog-digital converter which controls the
gain of the amplifier.
3. The fiber optic measuring device as claimed in claim
1, wherein .PHI. b(t) and .PHI. m(t) are in phase.
4. The fiber optic measuring device as claimed in claim
1, wherein .PHI. b(t) is delayed by .pi./2 relative to .PHI. m(t).
5. The fiber optic measuring device as claimed in claim
1, wherein .PHI. bm = .pi./2 and .PHI. mm = .pi..
6. A fiber optic measuring device in which a variation
in a measured parameter engenders a phase difference
between two waves, comprising:
- a quasi-monochromatic light source producing a wave,
the wave propagating with a propagation time,
- a SAGNAC ring interferometer
in which two counter-propagating waves created by a splitting
device for splitting and recombining waves propagate, the
propagation time of the waves between their splitting and
their recombining being ~,
- a detector producing a signal,
- a phase modulator modulated by a control signal, and
- electronic means comprising a processing system
furnishing by demodulation a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter and a modulation chain having
electronic means controlling by negative feed-back the phase
modulator, wherein the control signal for the phase modulator
is the superposition of a first, periodic gating, bias signal
.PHI. b(t) with period 2~ and amplitude .PHI. bm, and of a second
staircase, negative-feedback signal .PHI. m(t) synchronized with
.PHI. b(t), each step of which has a duration equal to ~ or to one
of its submultiples, and an amplitude .PHI. s, which is a function
18

of the value of the measured parameter and which falls back
to zero when its amplitude exceeds a predetermined value
.PHI. mm, the fall back introducing a singular phase shift in the
device, the singular phase shift introduced during the fall-
back of the negative-feedback signal producing in the device
a response for slaving .PHI. bm and .PHI. mm to 2 .PHI. bm + .PHI. mm =
2n.pi.
where n is an integer and hence to keep gain of the
modulation chain constant,
the electronic means negative-feedback control the phase
modulator as a function of the signal received from the
detector so that, on the one hand the variation in the
demodulated signal as a function of the phase difference in
the neighborhood of zero is approximately linear, and on the
other hand this phase difference is kept null, the
demodulated signal being an error signal, and furnishing by
exploiting the modulating signal, a signal which is a function
of the variation in the measured parameter, the electronic
means further comprising:
- a clock synchronizing all the components,
- an analog-digital converter intended to digitize the
signal produced by the detector, the analog-digital converter
being specified so that the analog value of its least
significant bit has a value less than or equal to the standard
deviation of the noise in the signal coming from the detector,
- a first digital processing system receiving a signal
from the analog-digital converter,
- a first servo-loop digital filter, fed by a signal leaving
the digital processing system, furnishing a signal
representing the measured parameter,
- a register receiving the signal leaving the servo-loop
digital filter and furnishing a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter for any desired external use,
- an accumulator fed by the signal leaving the register,
generating a negative-feedback signal from the measured
parameter, .PHI. m(t),
19

- a generator producing a bias signal .PHI. b (t),
- an adder comprising two inputs and one output, its
first input being fed by the signal which is a function of the
measured parameter produced by the register and the
accumulator, its second input being fed by the bias signal
.PHI. b(t),
- a first digital-analog converter fed by the output signal
from the adder and controlling the phase modulator via a gain
amplifier,
- a second digital processing system which produces
the difference between the signal sampled by the converter
before the fall-back and that sampled after,
- a second servo-loop integrating filter receiving the
signal issued from the second processing system, and
- a second analog-digital converter which controls the
gain of the amplifier, .PHI. b(t) and .PHI. m(t) are in phase, .PHI. bm =
.pi./2
and .PHI. mm = .pi..
7. A fiber optic rate gyro in which a variation in a
speed of rotation engenders a phase difference between two
waves, comprising:
- a quasi-monochromatic light source producing a wave,
the wave propagating with a propagation time,
- a SAGNAC ring interferometer
in which two counter-propagating waves created by a splitting
device for splitting and recombining waves propagate, the
propagation time of the waves between their splitting and
their recombining being ~,
- a detector producing a signal,
- a phase modulator modulated by a control signal, and
- electronic means comprising a processing system
furnishing by demodulation a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter and a modulation chain having
electronic means controlling by negative feed-back the phase
modulator, wherein the control signal for the phase modulator
is the superposition of a first, periodic gating, bias signal
20

.PHI.b(t) with period 2~ and amplitude .PHI.bm, and of a second
staircase, negative-feedback signal .PHI.m(t) synchronized with
.PHI.b(t), each step of which has a duration equal to ~ or to one
of its submultiples, and an amplitude .PHI.S, which is a function
of the value of the measured parameter and which falls back
to zero when its amplitude exceeds a predetermined value
.PHI.mm, the fall back introducing a singular phase shift in the
device, the singular phase shift introduced during the fall-
back of the negative-feedback signal producing in the device
a response for slaving .PHI.bm and .PHI.mm to 2.PHI.bm + .PHI.mm = 2n.pi.
where n is an integer and hence to keep gain of the
modulation chain constant.
8. The fiber optic rate gyro as claimed in claim 7,
wherein the electronic means negative-feedback control the
phase modulator as a function of the signal received from the
detector so that, on the one hand the variation in the
demodulated signal as a function of the phase difference in
the neighborhood of zero is approximately linear, and on the
other hand this phase difference is kept null, the
demodulated signal being an error signal, and furnishing by
exploiting the modulating signal, a signal which is a function
of the variation in the measured parameter, the electronic
means further comprising:
- a clock synchronizing all the components,
- an analog-digital converter intended to digitize the
signal produced by the detector, the analog-digital converter
being specified so that the analog value of its least
significant bit has a value less than or equal to the standard
deviation of the noise in the signal coming from the detector,
- a first digital processing system receiving a signal
from the analog-digital converter,
- a first servo-loop digital filter, fed by a signal leaving
the digital processing system, furnishing a signal
representing the measured parameter,
21

- a register receiving the signal leaving the servo-loop
digital filter and furnishing a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter for any desired external use,
- an accumulator fed by the signal leaving the register,
generating a negative-feedback signal from the measured
parameter, .PHI.m(t),
- a generator producing a bias signal .PHI.b (t),
- an adder comprising two inputs and one output, its
first input being fed by the signal which is a function of the
measured parameter produced by the register and the
accumulator, its second input being fed by the bias signal
.PHI.b(t),
- a first digital-analog converter fed by the output signal
from the adder and controlling the phase modulator via a gain
amplifier,
- a second digital processing system which produces
the difference between the signal sampled by the converter
before the fall-back and that sampled after,
- a second servo-loop integrating filter receiving the
signal issued from the second processing system, and
- a second analog-digital converter which controls the
gain of the amplifier.
9. The fiber optic rate gyro as clamed in claim 7,
wherein .PHI.b(t) and .PHI.m(t) are in phase.
10. The fiber optic rate gyro as clamed in claim 7,
wherein .PHI.b(t) is delayed by ~/2 relative to .PHI.m(t).
11. The fiber optic rate gyro as clamed in claim 7,
wherein .PHI.bm = .pi./2 and .PHI.mm = .pi..
12. A fiber optic rate gyro in which a variation in a
rotation measured engenders a phase difference between two
waves, comprising:
- a quasi-monochromatic light source producing a wave,
the wave propagating with a propagation time,
- a SAGNAC ring interferometer
in which two counter-propagating waves created by a splitting
22

device for splitting and recombining waves propagate, the
propagation time of the waves between their splitting and
their recombining being ~,
- a detector producing a signal,
- a phase modulator modulated by a control signal, and
- electronic means comprising a processing system
furnishing by demodulation a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter and a modulation chain having
electronic means controlling by negative feed-back the phase
modulator, wherein the control signal for the phase modulator
is the superposition of a first, periodic gating, bias signal
.PHI.b(t) with period 2~ and amplitude .PHI.bm, and of a second
staircase, negative-feedback signal .PHI.m(t) synchronized with
.PHI.b(t), each step of which has a duration equal to ~ or to one
of its submultiples, and an amplitude .PHI.S, which is a function
of the value of the measured parameter and which falls back
to zero when its amplitude exceeds a predetermined value
.PHI.mm, the fall back introducing a singular phase shift in the
device, the singular phase shift introduced during the fall-
back of the negative-feedback signal producing in the device
a response for slaving .PHI.bm and .PHI.mm to 2.PHI.bm + .PHI.mm = 2n.pi.
where n is an integer and hence to keep gain of the
modulation chain constant, the electronic means negative-
feedback control the phase modulator as a function of the
signal received from the detector so that, on the one hand the
variation in the demodulated signal as a function of the phase
difference in the neighborhood of zero is approximately
linear, and on the other hand this phase difference is kept
null, the demodulated signal being an error signal, and
furnishing by exploiting the modulating signal, a signal which
is a function of the variation in the measured parameter, the
electronic means further comprising:
- a clock synchronizing all the components,
- an analog-digital converter intended to digitize the
signal produced by the detector, the analog-digital converter
23

being specified so that the analog value of its least
significant bit has a value less than or equal to the standard
deviation of the noise in the signal coming from the detector,
- a first digital processing system receiving a signal
from the analog-digital converter,
- a first servo-loop digital filter, fed by a signal leaving
the digital processing system, furnishing a signal
representing the measured parameter,
- a register receiving the signal leaving the servo-loop
digital filter and furnishing a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter for any desired external use,
- an accumulator fed by the signal leaving the register,
generating a negative-feedback signal from the measured
parameter, .PHI.m(t),
- a generator producing a bias signal .PHI.b (t),
- an adder comprising two inputs and one output, its
first input being fed by the signal which is a function of the
measured parameter produced by the register and the
accumulator, its second input being fed by the bias signal
.PHI.b(t),
- a first digital-analog converter fed by the output signal
from the adder and controlling the phase modulator via a gain
amplifier,
- a second digital processing system which produces
the difference between the signal sampled by the converter
before the fall-back and that sampled after,
- a second servo-loop integrating filter receiving the
signal issued from the second processing system, and
- a second analog-digital converter which controls the
gain of the amplifier, .PHI.b(t) and .PHI.m(t) are in phase, .PHI.bm = .pi./2
and .PHI.mm = .pi..
13. An inertial stabilization or nagivation system
comprising at least one rate optic fiber gyro in which a
variation in a rotation engenders a phase difference between
two waves, comprising:
24

- a quasi-monochromatic light source producing a wave,
the wave propagating with a propagation time,
- a SAGNAC ring interferometer
in which two counter-propagating waves created by a splitting
device for splitting and recombining waves propagate, the
propagation time of the waves between their splitting and
their recombining being ~,
- a detector producing a signal,
- a phase modulator modulated by a control signal, and
- electronic means comprising a processing system
furnishing by demodulation a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter and a modulation chain having
electronic means controlling by negative feed-back the phase
modulator, wherein the control signal for the phase modulator
is the superposition of a first, periodic gating, bias signal
.PHI.b(t) with period 2~ and amplitude .PHI.bm, and of a second
staircase, negative-feedback signal .PHI.m(t) synchronized with
~b(t), each step of which has a duration equal to ~ or to one
of its submultiples, and an amplitude .PHI.S, which is a function
of the value of the measured parameter and which falls back
to zero when its amplitude exceeds a predetermined value
.PHI.mm, the fall back introducing a singular phase shift in the
device, the singular phase shift introduced during the fall-
back of the negative-feedback signal producing in the device
a response for slaving .PHI.bm and .PHI.mm to 2.PHI.bm + .PHI.mm = 2n.pi.
where n is an integer and hence to keep gain of the
modulation chain constant.
14. A fiber optic magnetic field and current sensor in
which a variation a magnetic field and current engenders a
phase difference between two waves, comprising:
- a quasi-monochromatic light source producing a wave,
the wave propagating with a propagation time,
- a SAGNAC ring interferometer
in which two counter-propagating waves created by a splitting
device for splitting and recombining waves propagate, the
25

propagation time of the waves between their splitting and
their recombining being ~,
- a detector producing a signal,
- a phase modulator modulated by a control signal, and
- electronic means comprising a processing system
furnishing by demodulation a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter and a modulation chain having
electronic means controlling by negative feed-back the phase
modulator, wherein the control signal for the phase modulator
is the superposition of a first, periodic gating, bias signal
.PHI.b(t) with period 2~ and amplitude .PHI.bm, and of a second
staircase, negative-feedback signal .PHI.m(t) synchronized with
.PHI.b(t), each step of which has a duration equal to ~ or to one
of its submultiples, and an amplitude ~S, which is a function
of the value of the measured parameter and which falls back
to zero when its amplitude exceeds a predetermined value
.PHI.mm, the fall back introducing a singular phase shift in the
device, the singular phase shift introduced during the fall-
back of the negative-feedback signal producing in the device
a response for slaving .PHI.bm and .PHI.mm to 2.PHI.bm + .PHI.mm = 2n~
where n is an integer and hence to keep gain of the
modulation chain constant.
15. A fiber optic measuring device as defined in any one of
claims 1 to 6 wherein said ring interferometer is monomode.
16. A fiber optic rate gyro as defined in any one of claims 7
to 12 wherein said ring interferometer is monomode.
17. A system as defined in claim 13 wherein said ring
interferometer is monomode.
18. A sensor as defined in claim 14 wherein said ring
interferometer is monomode.
26

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


20~0~~~
FIBER OPTIC MEASURING DEVICE, RATE GYRO, NAVIGATION AND
STABILIZATION SYSTEM, AND CURRENT SENSOR
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a fiber optic
measuring device enabling measurement of the variation
in a parameter which produces non-reciprocal
perturbations in a SAGNAC ring interferometer.
The SAGNAC interferometer and the physical
phenomena which it involves are well known. In such an
interferometer a splitting plate or other splitting
device divides an incident wave. The two counter
propagating Waves thus created propagate in opposite
directions along a closed optical path, recombine and
produce interference which depends on the phase shift
in the waves when they recombine.
Originally, the closed optical Bath of SAGNAC
interferometers was defined by mirrors. It is now known
that it may be constituted by a multi-turn, monomode
fiber optic coil.
It is also known that certain physical
phenomena are able to produce perturbations,
particularly non-reciprocal phase shifts, on counter-
propagating waves, engendering a relative phase shift
in these waves, which modify their state of
interference when they recombine.
The measurement of this relative phase shift
enables the phenomenon which engenders it to be
quantified.
PRIOR ART '
The principal physical phenomenon able to
create these non-reciprocal perturbations is the SAGNAC
effect produced by the rotation of the interferometer
relative to an axis perpendicular to the plane of its
closed optical path. The Faraday effect or colinear
magneto-optic effect is likewise known to produce non-
reciprocal effects of this type; this has for example
been described in an article in the journal OPTIC
LETTERS (Vol. 7, no. 4, April 1982, pages 1B0-182) by
- 2 -

20~~~~4
K. BOHM, tinder certain conditions, other effects can
likewise produce a non-reciprocal phase shift.
Hy contrast, variations in numerous parameters
representative of the environment which are often the
origin of perturbations in the measurements have only
reciprocal effects on the SAGNAC interferometer, do not
perturb the relative phase shift between the counter-
propagating waves, and hence have no influence on the
measurement of the parameter studied. Such is the case
for the slow variations of temperature, indices, etc.
which modify the optical path traversed by the waves,
but modify it in a reciprocal manner.
Much work has been conducted in order to
improve the _sensitivity and accuracy of the
measurements able to be performed with such a measuring
apparatus. As regards this topic, it will for example
be possible to consult chapter 9 entitled "Fiber Optic
Gyroscope" by Nerve C. Lefevre, in the work "Optical
Fiber Sensors" Vol. 2, ARTECH HOUSE, 1989.
In particular, it has firstly been observed
that the response furnished by the SAGNAC
interferometer is of the form P ~ Po(1 + cos 6~) and
hence that the sensitivity of this signal in the
neighborhood of the phase difference 6~ = 0, is low. It
has been proposed to introduce a squared phase
difference modulation, with amplitude more or less a/2
for example which displaces the operating point and
produces a periodic signal the amplitude of which is a
sinusoidal function of the measured parameter, and
which can hence be exploited with greater sensitivity
and stability.
It was later shown that the accuracy of the
measurement is improved by the use of a zero method,
also called closed-loop operation. According to this
method, an additional so-called negative-feedback phase
difference 6~Cr is applied, and serves to compensate
for the phase difference dip produced by the measured
parameter. The sum of these two phase differences d~cr
and b~p is kept null, this enabling the interferometer
- 3 -

204~4~~
to be operated with maximum accuracy. The measurement
is performed by exploiting the signal necessary for
producing the negative-feedback phase difference d~cr'
Thus, the measurement is stable and linear.
The slaving necessary for this closed-loop
operation can be performed through a frequency offset.
This offset can be generated directly on the basis of
acousto-optic modulators, or else simulated by applying
a serrodyne modulation to a phase modulator. Such a
serrodyne modulation is produced by applying a saw
tooth phase modulating ramp. Regarding this topic, US
Patent 4,299,490 can for example be consulted. It is
known however that this requires a well-regulated fall-
back of 2aa~ (where a is an integer] in order to prevent
parasitic sidebands' However, exploitation of the
signal after fall-backs makes it possible to produce
the regulation of the value of the fall-back in order
to ensure high accuracy in the measurement. It is also
known that a continuous ramp can be replaced by steps
synchronized on a clock and that such a signal can be
generated on the basis of a logic circuit and a
digital-analog converter.
In order to improve the sensitivity and
accuracy of the measurement, it has moreover been
proposed to digitize the signal on output from the
detector. The electronic processing means then comprise
an analog-digital converter, a digital processing
system exploiting the signal furnished by the analog-
digital converter bringing back the component thereof
at the modulation frequency about the continuous. A
servo-loop digital filter fed by the signal leaving the
digital processing system furnishes a signal
representing the measured parameter. A register
receiving the signal leaving the servo-loop digital
filter furnishes a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter for any desired external use. An
accumulator fed by the signal leaving the register
generates a digital ramp the slope of which is a
function of the measured parameter, and a digital-
- 4 -

analog converter fed by the ramp signal issuing from
the accumulator, controls the phase modulator.
The aim of the present invention is to improve
the sensitivity and stability of a fiber optic
measuring device whilst yet limiting the dynamic of the
modulation, thus permitting, for the same performance,
a decrease in the power supplied to the modulator and
hence a reduction in the parasitic thermal dissipation
which accompanies it. It is likewise an objective of
the invention to propose such a device in which the
gain in the negative-feedback modulation control chain
is kept constant. To this effect, the signals produced
during the fall-back of the phase ramp are used.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
1~ The invention relates to a fiber optic
measuring device in which the variation in the measured
parameter engenders a phase difference between two
waves, comprising a quasi-monochromatic light source,
a, preferably monumode, SAGNAC ring interferometer in
which two counter-propagating waves propagate, the
propagation time of the waves between their splitting
and their recombining being r, a detector, a phase
modulator, and electronic means comprising a processing
system furnishing a signal which is a function of the
measured parameter and electronic means controlling the
phase modulator.
According to the invention, the control signal
for the modulator is the superposition of a first,
periodic gating, bias signal generating a phase shift
~b(t) of period 2r and amplitude Vim, and a second,
staircase, negative-feedback signal generating a phase
shift ~m(t) each step of which has a duration equal to
r or to one of its sub-multiples, and an amplitude ~S,
which is a function of the value of the measured
parameter and which falls back from ~~ when its
amplitude exceeds a predetermined threshold, ~,m and
being related by the relationship 2~bm + ~~ = 2nx
where n is an integer, the response to the singular
phase shift introduced during the fall-back of the
- 5 -

negative-feedback signal being used to keep the gain of
the modulation chain constant. These phase shifts ~(t)
and ~m(t) are generated by a phase modulator placed at
the end of the coil and hence creating phase
differences between the 2 counter-propagating waves,
respectively equal to b~b(t)=~b(t)-~b(t-T) and b~m(t)=~m
(t)-~m(t-r) which add together.
The electronic means for processing the signal
are digital and comprise an analog-digital converter
intended to digitize the signal generated by the
detector, a digital processing system exploiting the
signal furnished by the analog-digital converter, a
servo-loop digital filter fed by the signal leaving the
digital processing system and furnishing a signal
representing the measured parameter, a register
receiving the signal leaving the servo-loop digital
filter and furnishing a signal which is a function of
the measured parameter for any desired external use, an
accumulator generating the steps on the basis of the
signal from the register, a modulation generator
producing a modulating signal, an adder comprising two
inputs and one output, its first input being fed by the
signal which is a function of the measured parameter
produced by the register and the accumulator, its
second input being fed by the bias modulating signal, a
digital-analog converter fed by the output signal from
the adder and controlling the phase modulator.
BRIEF DESCRIPTI(7N OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention will be described in detail with
reference to the drawings in which:
. Figure 1 is a general representation of the
measuring device of the invention.
. Figure 2 is a block diagram representing the
signal processing.
. Figure 3 represents the first, periodic
gating signal ~(t) (3A), and the second, staircase
signal ~m(t) (3B), which are used to control the
modulator.
- 6 -

20~0~8~
Figure 4 represents the phase difference
d~(t) (4C) produced in the interferometer by the
superposition of s~b(t) (4B) and b~m(t) (4A) in a first
embodiment.
. Figure 5 represents the phase difference
6~(t) (5C) produced in the interferometer by the
superposition of d~b(t) (5B) and s~m(t) (5A) in a
second embodiment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODII~iENT
The fiber optic measuring device of the
invention comprises a quasi-monochromatic light source
1 which is most often a laser or a super-luminescent
diode, and a monomode fiber optic SAGNAC ring
interferometer,_designated overall by the reference Z.
This ring interferometer 2 comprises a
splitting plate 21 splitting the waves at the input of
the interferometer, then their recombining at the
output, and a closed optical path 22 constituted by a
monomode optical fiber wound around itself. The
propagation time of the waves between their splitting
and their recombining is r.
This measuring device likewise comprises a
detector 3 furnishing a signal which is a function of
the state of interference of the waves at the output of
the interferometer itself.
The optical signal is furnished to the detector
3 via a splitter 6 for example constituted by a semi-
transparent plate.
At one of the ends of the optical path of the
interferometer there is interposed a modulator 4 which,
controlled on the basis of an electrical signal,
generates a phase shift ~(t) which is able to introduce
a phase dif f erence 6~ ( t ) ~ ( t ) - ~ ( t-r ) between the two
waves. The operation of the interferometer is improved
by , interposing a polarizer 23 and a spatial filter 24
between the light source 1 and the entrance of the ring
22, that is to say the splitting plate 21. In a known
manner, this spatial filter is constituted by a
monomode optical fiber.
- 7 _

204~4°~
Digital electronic means 7 negative-feedback
control the phase mpdulator 4 as a function of the
signal received from~the detector 3.
These digital electronic means 7 are configured
so that the variation in the demodulated error signal
as a function of ,the difference in step produced
between the two waves in the neighborhood of zero is
approximately linear. This arrangement makes it
possible to obtain a very high sensitivity of the
variation in the demodulated error signal in the
neighborhood of the zero in the step difference, whilst
it is readily appreciated that when the dependency of
the signal on the step difference is of cosine form,
the sensitivity in the zero neighborhood of the step
difference is very low. This is obtained by applying a
bias modulating signal ~b(t) to the control signal for
the phase modulator. The signal is a periodic gating
signal with period equal to 2r and maximum amplitude
~bm'
The function of the digital electronic means 7
is likewise to keep the step difference null. That is
to say that when the variation in the measured
parameter introduces a phase difference between the two
waves in the interferometer this difference produces a
variation in the signal emitted by the detector 3
provoking, via the digital electronic means 7 and the
phase modulator 4, an action which is equal and
ogpositely directed to the phase shift produced
initially, so that the overall phase difference is
brought back to the null value.
For this purpose, the electronic means 7
generate a staircase negative-feedback signal ~m(t).
Each step has a duration equal to r or to one of its
sub--multiples and an amplitude ~s which is a function
of the value of the measured parameter. It falls back
from the value ~~ when its amplitude exceeds a
predetermined threshold.
The bias modulating signal ~(t) and the
negative-feedback modulating signal ~m(t) are next
g

~o4o~s~
superimposed in order to control the phase modulator 4.
The fall-back of the negative-feedback modulating
signal ~m(t) is hence produced before its superposition
with the bias modulating signal ~b(t).
It has been observed that it is particularly
advantageous to connect the parameters ~bm and ~~ by
the relationship 2~bm + ~mm = 2n~r. The measurement thus
obtained is particularly stable and the fall-back of
the negative-feedback signal is advantageously used to
keep the gain of the modulating chain constant without
it being necessary for the dynamic of the measurement
to be large.
Finally, these digital electronic means 7
furnish, by exploiting the control signal fim(t) + ~b(t)
for the phase modulator 4, a signal which is a function
of the variation in the measuxed parameter.
The propagation time of the waves between their
splitting and their recombining is r.
The digital electronic means 7 comprise an
analog-digital converter 8 intended to digitize the
signal emitted by the detector 3.
The dynamic of the analog-digital converter 8
can be relatively low in relation to the measurement
dynamic as a whole. This dynamic is determined on the
basis of the definition of the low limit and the high
limit.
The low limit is determined so that the analog
value corresponding to the least significant bit has a
value less than or equal to the standard deviation of
the noise in the signal coming from the detector. This
condition prevents a blind zone corresponding to the
least significant bit, and renders the sampling noise
negligible relative to the initial noise in the analog
signal. Moreover, an additional digital filtering leads
in this case to the same improvement in the signal to
noise ratio as in analog mode. According to a practical
example, the sampling period is of the order of the
time of transit in the coil, namely for example
r = 0.5 ~s for 100 meters of fiber. The Shannon
- 9 -

~fl40~8~
criterion therefore imposes a large pass band on the
signal to be sampled: it has to be equal to 1/2r,
namely 1 MHz in this example. In such a pass band the
noise is relatively large: typically a standard
deviation of 10'3 of the bias feedback power which
corresponds to a phase shift of about 10-3 radians in
the interferometer. Hence it is sufficient, in order
not to lose sensitivity and in order to be able later
to improve the signal to noise ratio by filtering, that
the least significant bit correspond to this phase
shift.
For its part, the high limit must be at least
greater than the peak to peak value of the noise,
namely about 8 times its standard deviation and hence 3
bits would suffice for sampling the noise alone.
However, account must also be taken of the inherent
dynamic in the signals in closed-loop mode the latter
is slaved to zero and would not therefore a priori lay
claim to any dynamic but in practice the slaving
deviates from zero during sudden variations in the
parameter to be measured, and the dynamic of the
converter must be able to cope with these deviations.
These variations therefore define the number of
necessary bits. In practice 8 to 12 bits are sufficient
at converter level, whilst after digital filtering the
dynamic of the measured parameter can be greater than
20 bits.
The clock 21 drives all of these components.
A digital processing system 9 exploits the
signal furnished by the analog-digital converter 8 by
forming the difference between the samples
corresponding to a bias modulation of the phase
difference S~y(t~and those corresponding to 6~(t)
-~,m. It is follas~ed by a servo-loop integrating
digital filter 10 fed by the signal leaving the digital
processing system 9 and furnishing, after elimination
of the bias modulation, a signal representing the
measured parameter.
- 10 -

2~~~48~~
A register 11 receives the signal leaving the
servo-loop digital filter and furnishes a signal which
is a function of the measured parameter, which can be
used for any desired external use.
The unit 20 produces the negative-feedback
modulating signal ~m(t) on the basis of the value of
the measured parameter.
A modulation generator 12 produces the bias
modulating signal ~b(t).
The adder 13 comprises two inputs and one
output. Its first input is fed by a negative-feedback
signal which is a function of the measured parameter
produced by the register 11 and the unit 20, and its
second input is fed by the modulating signal produced
by the generator 12. Its output signal is therefore
~m(tD + s~b(t) .
A digital-analog converter 14 fed by the output
signal from the adder 13 controls the phase modulator 4
via the gain amplifier 15. The signal produced by the
generator 12 ensures the operating of the bias setting
system, that is to say an approximately linear
dependence between the phase shift introduced between
the two counter-propagating waves circulating in the
interferometer, and the signal produced in the detector
3.
In a first embodiment {Figure 4), in normal
operation, the processing system 7 generates the bias
modulating signal ~(t), and the negative-feedback
modulating signal ~m(t) composed of steps of duration r
of amplitude ~ks . ~b ( t ) and ~m ( t ) are in phase, that is
to say they are simultaneously constant for the same
interval of time of duration r.
The bias signal creates in the interferometer a
bias modulation b~ ( t ) _ ~ ( t ) - ~ ( t-r ) for the phase
difference. This modulation 6~{t) varies in gating
mode between + ~m and - ~, with a period of 2r.
The negative-feedback signal ~m(t) creates a
constant phase difference 6~m(t) equal to ads for steps
of duration r/a (where a is an integer greater than or
- 11 -

CA 02040484 2001-02-06
- equal to 1). 8owever, through overflow of the digital
register with dynamic ~~, the ramp ~m(t) falls back.
For a time r after this fall-back, the negative-
feedback modulation of the phase difference
6~m(t) - ~m(t) - ~m(t-r) becomes equal to ads
instead of ads. It is known that, in order to prevent
parasitic signals, it is sufficient for ~~ to
correspond to 2 x, the periodicity of the interference.
It has been observed that this known condition is not
strictly necessary and that it is advantageous to
reduce the value of this fall-back and hence limit the
power consumed in the modulator and the associated
thermal dissipation. In fact, this fall-back ~~ is
associated with the bias modulating signal ~(t).
Adopting the case where a = 1 for example, that is to
say where the steps have a duration ~, it has been
observed that the phase difference 3~(t) + b~m(t)
takes, on either side of a fall-back, the values:
bbl = ~s + ~bm and b~2 = ~s - ~bm - ~mm
or else
d ~' 1 = ~s - ~m and 6~' 2 = ~s + ~m -
The difference between these values is
therefore respectively:
6~1 - 6~2 = ~~ + 2~m
or else:
b~' 1 - s ~' 2 = ~~ - 2~bm
It has been observed that, by choosing ~~ -
2~m in the design of the logic processing circuit, it
is ensured that d~'1 - b~'2 - 0 which prevents any
parasitic signal in this case. It is also possible to
slave 6~1 - b~2 and hence ~~+ 2~m about 2x, in order
to prevent parasitic signals in the second case and in
order also to slave the gain of the modulating chain.
This can be performed with a processing system 16 which
produces the difference between the signal sampled by
the converter 8 before the fall-back and that sampled
after. This difference furnishes an error signal which
cancels out when bbl - 6~2 = o~ + 2~m = 2nx.
- 12 -

This error signal formulated by the system 16
is sent to a second servo-loop integrating filter 17.
The digital signal issuing from this digital filter is
then restored to analog mode in a second digital-analog
converter 18 which controls the gain of the amplifier
( as represented in Figure 2 ) or else the reference
voltage of the converter 14 (not represented). This
second loop slaves the gain of the modulating chain and
therefore leads to ensuring an accurate measurement of
10 the value of the step ~s generated in the first
negative-feedback loop. With this step ~s being opposed
to the phase difference 8~p/a depending on the
parameter to be measured, this leads to an accurate
measurement of the latter.
15 Tn a second embodiment (Figure 5) the
processing system 7 generates the bias modulating
signal ~b(t) and the negative-feedback modulating
signal ~m(t) composed of steps of duration r, of
amplitude ~s, and the synchronizing of ~m(t) with ~(t)
is delayed by r/2.
The bias signal creates in the interferometer a
bias modulation b~ ( t ) - ~ ( t ) -~ ( t-r ) of the phase
difference. This modulation d~(t) varies in the gating
mode between +~m and -Vim, with a period of 2r.
The negative-feedback signal ~m(t) creates a
constant phase difference 6~m(t) equal to ~s for steps
of duration r. However, through overflow of the digital
register with dynamic ~~, the ramp ~m(t) falls back.
For a time r after this fall-back the negative-feedback
modulation of the phase difference &~m(t)=s~m(t)-~m(t-r)
- ads-~~ instead of to ~s before this fall-back.
As a result of the r/2 synchronization delay
between ~(t) and ~m(t), the fall-back of ~m(t) takes
place in the middle of the +~m level or else in the
middle of the -~m level of S~ ( t ) ( labeled 50 and 51
in Figure 5H). For a duration r before the fall-back,
6~(t) still takes 2 values each of duration r/2:
bbl = ~s + ~bm
s~ ~ 1 a ~8 - ~ID
- 13 -

2~4fl4~t~
For a duration r after the fall-back, 6~(t)
still takes 2 values each of duration r/2:
6~2 = ~s - ~bm - ~mm
d~'2 = ~s + ~bm
If the fall-back takes place in the middle of
the + ~bm level, the 4 successive states of S~(t) of
duration r/2 surrounding this fall-back will be:
a~'1, ail, s~'2 and s~2
If the fall-back takes place in the middle of
the - ~bm level, the 4 successive states of d~(t) of
duration r/2 surrounding this fall-back will then be:
ail, s~'l, s~2 and a~'2
It has been observed that by choosing ~
2 ~bm the processing system 16 had to carry out the
operation:
sample 1 + sample 2 - sample 3 - sample 4.
In both cases, this operation generates an
error signal which cancels out when:
dal - a~2 = ~~ + 2~m = 2n~
since a~'1 - b~'2 = 0 when ~~ = 2~bm
This operation therefore furnishes an error
signal analogous to that obtained in the first
embodiment described with reference to Figure 4.
This error signal formulated by the system 16
is processed in the same manner as in the embodiment
described previously, in such a way as to slave the
gain of the modulating chain.
We note that in this second embodiment, the
sampling of the signal coming from the detector must
take place with a period r/2, and not r.
The measuring device of the invention is
particularly well suited to constructing a rate gyro.
In this case, the measured parameter is the speed of
rotation of the intezferometer about its axis.
This rate gyro advantageously comes into the
construction of inertial stabilization or navigation
systems.
- It

204044
Such an arrangement is likewise well suited to
constructing the electric current and magnetic field
measuri~ag device, by profiting from the Faraday effect.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2011-04-15
Letter Sent 2008-06-26
Inactive: Office letter 2008-04-16
Inactive: Reversal of will be deemed expired status 2007-08-23
Inactive: Office letter 2007-08-23
Inactive: Office letter 2007-08-23
Letter Sent 2007-05-30
Letter Sent 2007-04-16
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: Late MF processed 2004-04-21
Grant by Issuance 2001-11-20
Inactive: Cover page published 2001-11-19
Pre-grant 2001-08-08
Inactive: Final fee received 2001-08-08
Letter Sent 2001-04-04
Letter Sent 2001-03-06
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2001-03-06
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2001-03-06
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2001-02-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-02-06
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2000-10-12
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-09-06
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2000-03-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 1998-02-02
Letter Sent 1997-11-03
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1997-10-24
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1997-10-24
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1997-10-08
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1997-10-08
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1991-10-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2001-04-17

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
IXSEA
Past Owners on Record
HERVE LEFEVRE
PHILIPPE MARTIN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1993-12-09 14 570
Claims 1993-12-09 11 411
Abstract 1993-12-09 1 32
Drawings 1993-12-09 4 68
Claims 2001-02-05 11 467
Description 2001-02-05 14 574
Claims 2000-09-05 11 495
Representative drawing 2001-10-17 1 5
Representative drawing 1999-07-25 1 5
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1997-11-02 1 179
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2001-03-05 1 164
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2004-05-05 1 166
Fees 2003-04-03 1 42
Correspondence 2001-08-07 1 33
Fees 1999-03-11 1 48
Fees 2002-04-04 1 41
Fees 2001-04-16 1 41
Fees 1998-03-08 1 42
Fees 2000-02-10 1 44
Fees 2004-04-20 1 38
Fees 2005-03-13 1 34
Fees 2006-03-02 1 34
Correspondence 2007-08-22 1 13
Correspondence 2007-08-22 1 22
Correspondence 2007-07-15 3 109
Correspondence 2008-04-15 1 16
Fees 2008-03-02 1 62
Correspondence 2008-06-25 1 13
Correspondence 2008-05-04 3 93
Fees 2008-06-29 1 85
Fees 2008-03-06 1 91
Fees 1997-03-23 1 48
Fees 1996-03-12 1 31
Fees 1994-04-10 1 40
Fees 1995-03-28 1 34
Fees 1993-03-31 1 28