Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
2~3~1~
32827CA
.",.._
CATALYST AND PROCESS FOR MAKING BIMODAL POLYOLEFINS
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to olefin polymerization. In another
aspect, the present invention relates to catalysts for use in the
polymerization of olefins. In still another aspect, the present invention
relates to the polymerization of olefins using at least two independent
particulate catalysts.
~- ~ Background of the Invention
Various techniques have been employed in the past for the
polymerization of polymers and copolymers of olefins. One of the approaches
has involved employing catalysts based upon transltion metal compounds such as
titanium. Another approach has involved the employment of catalysts
containing chromium. As a general rule these two types of catalysts produce
polyolefins having somewhat different physical characteristics. For some
applications, it is desirable to have polyolefins which have a blend of the
properties that are produced by the titanium and the chromium catalyst. An
example of such polyolefin compositions include those which have been referred
to as ~having bimodal molecular weight distributions. Some techniques for
preparing such bimodal polymers have involved the use of multiple reactor
arrangements, sometimes loops, sometimes stirred tanks in which different
polymerization conditions such as temperature, hydrogen, or comonomer are
employed in the different reaction zones. Such multiple reactor schemes,
while offering versatility in resin characteristics, can be less efficient
than would be desired. The control of the multiple reactor schemes is
~ ~ ~ 3 8 ~ 4 32827CA
difficult and reactor size for one resin may by necessity be miss-sized for
another. Another technique which has been used to make bimoda] polyolefin
compositions involves merely blending polyolef;n resins having different
characteristics; for example, in an extruder to obtain a reasonable
homogeneous mixture.
In addition, some attempts have been made to combine titanium and
chromium on a single catalyst. Examples of such catalyst systems are
disclosed in U.S. 3,622,521 and U.S. 4,041,224.
In addition, U.S. 4,285,834 discloses carrying out the
polymerization of olefins using a mixture of two independent supported
catalysts, one of which contains titanium or vanadium and the other of which
contains chromium. While the use of these catalyst mixtures produces some
interesting polymers, there is still room for improvement. The improved
properties of most bimodal polymers such as those produced by blending result
not just from the broad characteristics of the bimodal molecule weight
distribution. Instead it is believed that to obtain polymers having the most
desirable combination of propert;es for many applications, it is desirable to
obtain a polymer in which the branching is concentrated mainly in the high
molecular we;ght portion of the molecular weight distribution.
An object of the present invention is to provide novel catalyst
mixtures.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for
the polymerization ~f olefins to produce polymers having a broad molecular
weight distribution with the branching concentrated in the high molecular
weight portion of the molecular weight distribution.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a mixed
catalyst system which can be employed effectively in particle form
polymerization of olefins.
Other aspects, objects and advantages of the present invention will
become apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of this
disclosure.
~43~
32827CA
Summary of the Invention
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a method
for preparing an ethylene copolymer comprising contacting ethylene and at
least one comonomer selected from alpha-olefins containing 3 to 18 carbon
atoms in a liquid diluent under particle form polymerization conditions in the
presence of a catalyst mixture comprising (1) a particulate
chromium-containing catalyst and (1) a particulate titanium-containing
catalyst, wherein under the polymerization conditions the chromium-containing
catalyst is more effective in incorporating comonomer than the
titanium-containing catalyst and produces higher molecular weight polymer than
the titanium-containing catalyst.
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a
catalyst mixture suitable for the polymerization of ethylene. The catalyst
mixture comprises (1) a particulate chromium-containing catalyst prepared by
impregnating a low porosity silica with chromium, activating by contacting
with oxygen at a temperature in the range of about 800~F to about 1200~F, and
then contacting the activated catalyst with carbon monoxide at a temperature
in the range of about 500~F to about 900~F and (2) a particulate
titanium-containing catalyst prepared by reacting a titanium alkoxide with a
magnesium dihalide in a suitable liquid to obtain a solution, contacting said
solution with a hydrocarbyl aluminum halide to produce a precipitate,
contacting said precipitate first with titanium tetrachloride and then with a
hydrocarbyl aluminum compound.
In an especially preferred embodiment the chromium-containing
catalyst and the titanium-containing catalyst are each independently fed to
the polymerization zone and the ratio of one catalyst to the other is used to
control the melt index, density, and/or mo]ecular weight distribution of the
polymer.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The Chromium Containing Catalyst
A large number of patents exists describing various
chromium-containing catalysts. Some examples include those U.S. 3,887,494;
3,900,457; 4,053,436; 4,101,722; 4,150,208; 4,151,122; 4,294,724; 4,392,990;
32827~
4 ~ ~ 4 3~ ~ 4
4,40S,501; 4,041,224; 3,622,521; 3,798,202, and 2,846,425.
The particular cllromium catalyst employed can he readily selected by
one skilled in the art after having the benefit of this disclosure.
Preferably, a chr~mium catalyst is selected that is not particularly affected
by hydrogen or by the small flmounts of the cocatalyst that is used with the
titanium-containing catfllyst. Also, the chromium cat~lyst should be one which
is more effective in incorporating comonomer thfln the titanium-containing
catalyst under the selected polymerization conditions.
The amount of chromium in the catalysts can vary over a wide range.
Any suitab]e catalytic amount could be employed. Typically, the
chromium-containing catalyst will contain about 0.1 to about 10 weight percent
chromium, more preferably about 0.1 to about 5 weight percent chromium. As a
general rule, catalysts containing ahout 1 weight percent chromium are
preferre~. The term weight percent as used i,n this paragraph refers to weight
percent chromium based on the weight of the chromium-cont~ining catalyst.
The currently preferred chromium catalysts are low pore volume
silica supported catalysts prepared by incorporating chromium on silica and
activating in air at a temperature in the range of about 800~F to about
1100~F. Preferably the Cr containing silica i9 then reduced with carbon
monoxide at a temperature in the range of about 500~F to about 900~F. Low
pore volume catalysts suitable for such an activation ~nd reduction process
include catalysts which can be bought from W.R, Grace und~r the trade
designations 969Tn, 969MS~ 968MS, ~nd 967. G~nerally it is desirable to
employ a catalyst having a porosity of no more than about 1.5 cc, more
preferab]v no mor~ than about 1.3 cc.
The Titanium Catalyst
The particular titanium-cont,aining cataly~l to be employ~d can
refldily be determined by those skilled in the art after having had the benefit
of this disclosure.
A particularly preferred titanium c~talyst that can be employed in
the present invention is one of the type disclosed in a commonly owned
copending Canadian patent application 2,043,904, of which the present
applicants are co-inventors. This tit~niu~ catalyst has been found to be
2~43~
32827CA
,..,,_
particularly useful for the particle form polymerization when it is desirable
to carry out the polymerization with low levels of organometallic cocatalysts.
Such a titanium catalyst is prepared by contacting a titanium
alkoxide and a magnesium dihalide in a suitable liquid to produce a solution.
The solution is then contacted with a suitable hydrocarbyl aluminum halide to
obtain a solid. The solid, after possibly being contacted with olefin to form
prepolymer, is contacted with titanium tetrachloride and then the resulting
solid is contacted with a hydrocarbyl aluminum compound prior to the
introduction of the solid into a polymerization vessel.
Examples of the titanium alkoxides include the titanium
tetraalkoxides in which the alkyl groups contain 1 to about 10 carbon atoms
each. Some specific examples include titanium tetramethoxide, titanium
dimethoxide diethoxide, titanium tetraethoxide, titanium tetra-n-butoxide,
titanium tetrahexyloxide, titanium tetradecyloxide, and titanium
cyclohexyloxide.
The magnesium dihalide is preferably magnesium chloride.
The titanium alkoxide and the magnesium dihalide can be combined in
any suitable liquid. Examples include substantially anhydrous organic liquids
such as n-pentane, n-hexane, n-heptane, methylcyclohexane, toluene, xylenes,
and the like.
The molar ratio of the transition metal compound to the metal halide
can be selected over a relatively broad range. Generally, the molar ratio is
within the range of about 10 to 1 to about 1 to 10, preferably between about 3
to 1 to about 0.5 to 2; however, more often the molar ratios are within the
range of about 2 to 1 to about 1 to 2.
Generally, it is desirable to heat the liquid mixture to obtain a
solution. Generally, the components are mixed at a temperature in the range
of about 15~C to about 150~C. The mixing could be carried out at atmospheric
pressure or at higher pressures.
The time required for mixing the two components is any suitable~time
which will result in a solution. Generally, this would be a time within the
range of ahout 5 minutes to about 10 hours. Following the mixing operation,
the resulting solution can be filtered to remove any undissolved material or
extraneous solid, if desired.
~Q~3~1~
32827CA
The precipitating agent is selected from the group consisting of
hydrocarbyl aluminum halides. Preferably the hydrocarbyl aluminum halide is
selected from compounds of the formula RmAlX3 wherein R is a hydrocarbyl
group having 1 to 8 carbons, X is a halogen, and m is a number in the range of
1 to 3. Some specific examples of such compounds include ethylaluminum
sesquichloride, diethylaluminum chloride, and ethylaluminum dichloride.
The amount of precipitating agent employed can be selected over a
relatively broad range depending upon the particular activities desired.
Generally, the molar ratio of the transition metal of the titanium-containing
component to the precipitating agent is within the range of from about 10 to 1
to about 1 to 10 and more generally within the range of about 2 to 1 to about
1 to 3.
In especially preferred embodiments the catalyst contains an amount
of prepolymer sufficient to improve the particle size of the catalyst and
ultimately the size of the polymer particles produced in a polymerization
reaction.
One way of forming prepolymer involves conducting the precipitation
in the presence of an aliphatic mono-l-olefin. Another technique involves
contacting the precipitated solid with an aliphatic mono-l-olefin under
suitable conditions to form prepolymer, either before or after the treatment
with titanium tetrachloride. Examples of olefins which can be used for
forming prepolymer include ethylene, propylene, l-butene, l-pentene, l-hexene,
l-heptene, 3-methyl-1-pentene, l-heptene, l-octene, and the like and mixtures
of one or more thereof. The weight of prepolymer based on the total weight of
the final prepolymerized catalyst is generally in the range of from about 1 to
about 50 weight percent, more preferably about 1 to about 20 weight percent,
snd still more preferably about 5 to about 10 weight percent.
The precipitated solid, either with or without prepolymer, is
contacted with titanium tetrachloride. The relative ratios of the titanium
tetrachloride to the solid can vary over a wide range; however, as a general
rule, the weight ratio of the titanium tetrachloride to the prepolymerized or
unprepolymerized solid would generally be within the range of about 10 to 1 to
about 1 to 10, more general]y about 7 ~o ] to about 1 to 4.
~0~3~
32827CA
_,,
Preferably after the precipitated solid is contacted with TiCl~, it
is washed several times with a hydrocarbon that acts as a solvent for the
TiCl4.
The pretreatment of the catalyst with the hydrocarbyl aluminum
compound prior to the introduction of the catalyst into the polymerization
zone is preferably carried out in a substantially inert liquid, generally a
hydrocarbon.
The hydrocarbyl aluminum compound that is contacted with the
titanium-containing solid catalyst can be selected from generally any of those
type of hydrocarbyl aluminum reducing agents that have in the past been used
as cocatalysts with such titanium-containing catalysts. The currently
preferred organometallic reducing agents are selected from compounds of the
formula R AlZ3 wherein R is a hydrocarbyl group having 1 to 8 carbons, Z is
a halogen, hydrogen, or hydrocarbyl group having 1 to 8 carbons, and m is a
number in the range of 1 to 3. Examples include organoaluminum compounds such
as triethylaluminum, trimethylaluminum, diethylaluminum chloride,
ethylaluminum dichloride, ethylaluminum sesquichloride, methylaluminum
sesquichloride, triisopropylaluminum, dimethylaluminum chloride,
tridecylaluminum, trieicosylaluminum, tricyclohexylaluminum,
triphenylaluminum, 2-methylpentyldiethylaluminum, triisoprenylaluminum,
methylaluminum dibromide, ethylaluminum diiodide, isobutylaluminum dichloride,
dodecylaluminum dibromide, dimethylaluminum bromide, diisopropylaluminum
chloride, methyl-n-propylaluminum bromide, di-n-octylaluminum bromide,
diphenylaluminum chloride, dicyclohexylaluminum bromide, methylaluminum
sesquibromide, ethylaluminum sesquiiodide, and the like and mixtures thereof.
The currently most preferred organometallic reducing agents are selected from
trialkylaluminum compounds, especially triethylaluminum. Preferably each R is
an alkyl group containing 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
The amount of reducing agent employed in pretreating the
titanium-containing catalyst can vary over a wide range. The optimum amount
needed for the best overall improvement in the particle form polymerization
can be determined by routine experimentation. Generally, excess
organometallic reducing agent can be used; however, in such cases it is
desirable to subject the resulting product to a number of washes with a
suitable solvent, for example a hydrocarbon, to assure that soluble
~ 3 8 ~ 4 32827CA
~ ,~
organometallic reducing agent i9 removed from the c8talyst prior to the
introduction of the cfltalyst into the polymerization process. More
preferablv, the organometallic reducing agent is employed in an amount such
that the molar ratio of the reducing agent to titanium in the catalyst would
be in the range of about 0.01:1 to about 10:1, still more preferably about
0.02:1 to about 3:1. Here again it is general1y desirable to subj~ct the
resu]tin~ catalyst to a wash trefltment if the catalyst contains a significant
flmount of soluble reducing agent.
Preferably conditions are employed in all the cfltalyst preparation
steps to minim ~e the presence of oxygen and water. The contacting can be
carried out over a hroad range of temperature conditions. Typically, the
contacting of the titanium sol;d and the hydrocarbyl aluminum compound would
be conducted at a temperature in the range of about 15~C to about 150~C, more
typically, about 20~C to about 100~C. After the contacting, the mother liquor
is generally decanted and the resulting solids Wfl~ d several times with a
suitable liquid solvent such as a hydrocarbon.
The resulting pretreated catalyst may if desired be mixed with a
particulate diluent such as, for example, silica, silica-alumina,
silica-titania. magnesium dichloride, magnesium oxide, polyethylene,
polypropylene, and poly(phenylene sulfide), prior to the use of the catalyst
in a polymerization process. The weight ratio of the particulate diluent to
the catalyst c~n be varied ov~r a wide range. Typically, the weight ratio of
the pflrticulate dilnent to the catalyst is general]y within the rsMge of about
100 to 1 to about 1 to 100, or more often in the range of about 20 to 1 to
about 2 to 1. The use of a particulate diluent has been found to be
particularly effective in facilitating the controlled charging of the catalyst
to the reactor.
Examples of titanium-containing catalysts which could be pretreated
with a hydrocarbyl aluminum compound to yield a titanium-containing catalyst
that cfln be used in combination with the chromium-containing catalyst in
accordance with the present invention include prepolymerized titanium
catalysts of the type disclosed in V.S. Patent No. 4,325,837.
~43~
32827CA
.,,_ 9
Catalyst Ratios
The ratios of the particulate titanium catalyst to the particulate
chromium catalyst can vary over a wide range depending upon the particular
properties desired. As a general rule, the weight ratio of the titanium
catalyst to the chromium catalyst would be in the range of about 99:1 to about
1:99, more preferably about 80:20 to about 20:80. Preferably the catalysts
are used in amounts such that each is responsible for 25 to 75 weight percent
of the polymer produced.
Monomers
The invention is considered suitable for the copolymerization of
ethylene with a wide range of olefins, particularly those aliphatic alpha
monoolefins and alpha diolefins having 3 to about 18 carbon atoms. Some
examples of such alpha olefins include propylene, butene-l, butadiene,
pentene, 3-methylbutene-1, 4-methylpentene-1, hexene-l, octene-l, dodecene-l,
octadecene-l, 1,7-octadiene, and mixtures thereof and the like.
The amount of alpha olefin comonomer can vary over a wide range.
Typically the molar ratio of the comonomer to ethylene would be in the range
of about 99:1 to about 1:99, more generally about 25:75 to about 1:99.
The invention is particularly useful for the polymerization of
ethylene in combination with small amounts of higher alpha olefins such as
butene-l or hexene-l, generally in amounts of less than 20 weight 7O based on
the weight of the ethylene.
Polymerization Conditions
The inventive polymerization process involves carrying out the
olefin polymerization under particle form polymerization conditions.
Typically, this requires the employment of polymerization temperatures in the
range of from about 60~C to about 110~C, more preferably about 70~C to about
90~C. The reaction can be conducted in a batch reactor or in a suitable
continuous reactor. It is generally preferable to carry out the
polymerization in an elongated reaction tmbe which is contacted externally
with suitab]e cooling media to maintain the desired polymerization
temperature. A preferred technique uses loop reactor in which the reaction
mixture and polymer is circulated within a pipe loop. The time involved for
32827CA
the polymerization will vary depending upon the particular catalyst mixture
employed, the temperature, and the desired type of polymer. Typically, when
the polymerization is conducted on a commercial scale the residence time is in
the range of about 1/2 hour to about 2 hours.
It is generally desirable to carry out the polymerization in the
absence of moisture and oxygen. As a general rule the polymerization is
conducted in the presence of a suitable liquid diluent. Examples of such
diluents include isobutane, n-butane, n-hexane, isooctane, cyclohexane,
methylcyclopentane, dimethylcyclohexane, and the like.
The polymerization pressures are generally in the range of from
about 110 to about 700 psia, or higher. Typically total Cr and Ti catalyst
concentrations would be in the range of about 0.001 to about 1 weight percent
based on the total weight of the polymerization reaction mixture.
In order to obtain polymers with particularly desirable physical
properties it is desirable to employ hydrogen during the polymerization
period. The amount of hydrogen employed can vary over a wide range depending
upon the particular results desired. Typically, the hydrogen would be
employed in an amount in the range of about 0.5 to about 5, more preferably
about 1.5 to about 2.5 mole percent based on the weight of the polymerization
diluent.
As a general rule it is advantageous to use the mixed catalyst
system in combination with a small but effective activating amount of an
organometallic cocatalyst. Such organometallic cocatalyst are those of the
general type which have in the past been used ln activating transition metal
containing catalyst systems such as those based upon titanium. Examples of
such cocatalyst thus include organic aluminum compounds such as trihydrocarbyl
aluminum compounds. Triethylaluminum is a currently favored cocatalyst. The
amount of cocatalyst employed can vary over a wide range but generally it is
desirable to limit its use so that the liquid polymerization diluent does not
contain more than about 20 ppm of the cocatalyst, more preferably less than
10 ppm. The applicants have observed that, particularly in particle form
polymerization the higher levels of cocatalyst tend to deactivate the chromium
portion of the catalyst mixture.
~3~
32827CA
11
One of the advantages of the particulate titanium catalyst employed
in the present invention is that it can be effective even though the level of
cocatalyst such as trialkylaluminum is very low.
The polymer is readily recovered from the polymerization mixture by
driving off unreacted monomor and liquid diluent. As a general rule, no
further removal of impurities is required. In some instances, however, it may
be desirable to add a small amount of a catalyst deactivating reagent of the
types conventionally employed for deactivating titanium type catalysts.
A further understanding of the present invention and its objects and
advantages will be provided by the following examples.
In the following examples the particulate titanium catalyst was
prepared by reacting titanium tetraethoxide with magnesium dichloride to
produce a solution. The solution was then contacted with on alkylaluminum
halide to obtain a precipitate. Ethylene prepolymer was deposited upon the
solid and then the solid was treated with titanium tetrachloride and then
washed with a hydrocarbon. A hydrocarbon slurry of the resulting solid was
then contacted with triethylaluminum and washed several times with a
hydrocarbon to remove soluble triethylaluminum. In order to have a catalyst
which would feed well in the equipment being used, the titanium catalyst was
admixed with calcined silica.
The chromium catalysts used in the following examples were 951
silica supported chromium catalysts which activated in air at 1000~F and then
reduced with carbon monoxide at 700~F prior to use. The chromium catalysts
contained about 1 weight percent chromium, based on the total weight of the
catalyst.
The experiments set forth in the following examples were carried out
using an 87 liter, 15.2 cm diameter pipe loop reactor. Two catalyst mud pipes
were employed each with its own catalyst feeder for independent control of the
particulate titanium catalyst and the particulate chromium catalyst.
Example I
A series of polymerization reactions were carried out using
different levels of the titanium and the chromium catalysts to determine the
effects of the inventive catalyst mixtures. The polymerizations were
conducted at 180~F, about 1.5 to about 2 mole percent hydrogen, about 5 to 10
32827CA
,~......
12
parts per million triethylaluminum cocatalyst, and l-hexene was used as a
comonomer along with the ethylene. The amount of hexene feed was about 15
weight % based on the weight of the ethylene feed. The variations in the
polymerization runs and the effects on the resulting polymers are summarized
in Table I.
Table I
Resins Produced with Varied XPF/Cr Ratios
Catalyst, %
Resin Ti Cr HL(MI) Density HI
1 100 0 (42) 0.959 6
2 65 35 81 0.950 23
3 50 50 33 0.948 28
4 40 60 22 0.047 26
0.942 31
6 20 8~ 1 0.940 37
7 0 100 2 0.939 41
Table I shows that when the titanium catalyst was used alone, a polymer was
obtained which had a melt index of 42 and a density of 0.959. In contrast
when all of the catalyst was the particulate chromium-containing catalyst, a
polymer was obtained having a high load melt index of 2 and a density of
0.939. The data thus shows that the use of the titanium catalyst alone yields
a polymer having an average molecular weight somewhat lower than that of the
polymer produced when the catalyst was totally the chromium catalyst. In
addition the heterogeneity index (HI) of the polymer formed using only the
titanium catalyst was much lower than that of the polymer produced using only
the chromium catalyst. This demonstrates that as is known in the art titanium
catalysts produces a generally lower molecular weight, narrower molecular
weight distribution polymer than do the chromium catalysts. The data reveals
~43~
32827CA
13
further that by using mixtures of the titanium catalyst and the chromium
catalyst, in accordance with the present inventon, it is possible to both vary
the density of the resulting polymer, the molecular weight of the polymer, and
the molecular weight distribution. As the chromium component was increased
the molecular weight distribution of the polymer was broadened. These
polymers were subjected to size exclusion chromatography for a further study
of the molecular weight distribution. While the molecular weight distribution
of the polymers produced using mixtures of the catalysts remained relatively
broad, it was apparent that the peaks of the molecular weight distribution
were shifted to ]ower molecular weight products. This illustrates that both
the titanium and the chromium catalysts are contributing, to result in
polymers which can be viewed as bimodal, i.e. having molecular weight
distribution contributions of both the titanium and the chromium catalysts.
An additional polymerization run was conducted using the same
catalyst as was used for Resin 3 in Table I. The reactor conditions, except
for temperature, were the same as for the other runs in Table I. This
polymerization run differed from that used in making Resin 3 only in that the
polymerization was conducted at 190~F rather than 180~F. The higher
temperature resulted in a slightly narrower molecular weight distribution as
evidenced by a heterogeneity index of 24 versus that of 28 for Resin 3. In
addition, the higher reactor temperature resulted in a polymer having a
somewhat higher high load melt index, specifically a high load melt index of
56 as compared to the high load melt index 33 of Resin 3. This illustrates
that by varying the temperature one can make changes in the melt index
molecular weight distribution or density of the polymer. In this case the
resin produced at 190~F had a density of 0.946 as compared to the 0.948
density of Resin 3.
Example II
Certain of the polymers from Example I were compounded using a
typical bottle resin recipe including antioxidants and the like. Two
additional polymerization runs were conducted using a commercial
chromium-containing catalyst sold by W. R. Grace as 969 NS. These polymers
were also compounded using a typical bottle resin recipe.
~46~8~ ~'
32827CA
14
The polymerization vari~bles and the properties of the polymer
compositions are summarized in Table II. Table II further contains the
physical properties of a typical bottle composition prepared from a typical
commercial scale polymer produced using a chromium catalyst.
Table II
Bottle Resins From Two Catalyst Feeders
Commercial
Scale
Run 9 10 11 12 Resin
Catalyst, Ti/Cr 65/35 50/50969 MS969 MS Cr
Reactor Temp., ~F 180 180 212 216 --
H2, mol% 1.60 1.71 0.22 0.26 --
C6 1, wt. % of C2 (1) 15.3 14.8 1.8 1.5 __
TEA, ppm 4.5 4.7 0 0 0
MI, pellet 0.44 0.17 0.43 0.26 0.32
HLMI/MI 122 165 86 126 100
Density 0.952 0.950 0.951 0.9530.952
Productivity (ash) ( )2860 2380 1530 2150 --
Bell ESCR, hrs. >1000 >1000 112 52 --
PTC Results (105 g. bottle)
ESCR ~Orvusk), hrs. 650 >700 130 80 130
Impact, ft. 9 >12 >12 7 >12
Die Swell (bottom layflat) 5.58 5.65 5.40 5.20 5.45
~1) C2 = 7-8 mol. %
(2) Residence Time = 75 min.
2a43~
32827CA
_
The data in Table II shows that higher titanium to chromium ratios
in the inventive mixture produces a higher melt index, higher density polymer.
Also the molecular weight distribution as ref]ected by HLMI/MI narrows as the
titanium component was increased. Certain properties of the bottle
compositions produced using the polymer obtained with the inventive catalyst
mixture were comparable to those of the compositions produced using the
typical bottle resin which was made in a commercial scale plant. Runs 11 and
12 used the 969 MS catalyst in the pilot plant reactor. It is notable that
the bell and bottle ESCR values of the resins produced using the inventive
mixed catalyst systems are dramatically higher than those of the resins
produced using the MS catalyst.
Example III
Another pilot plant polymerization run was carried out using the
above-described inventive titanium/chromium mixed particulate catalysts in an
attempt to make a polyethylene copolymer comparable to the commercial scale
polymers often employed in making plastic pipe. The polymerization conditions
are summarized in Table III. For comparison purposes the physical properties
of a typical commercial scale pipe resin are included as a control. Both the
inventive polymer and the commercial scale polymer were used to make typical
natural color pipe compositions.
2~4~S~ ~
32827CA
16
",._
Table III
Pipe Resin (Natural, Not Black~, Two Catalyst Feeders
Run 13 Control
Catalyst, Ti/Cr 45/55 Cr
Reactor Temp., ~F 180 --
H2, mol % 1.54 --
C6 , wt. % of C2 ( 15.2 --
TEA, ppm 4 __
HLMI, pellet 9 11
Density 0.946 0.945
Productivity (ash)( ) 2560 --
PTC Results (1" pipe)
Flex. Mod., Kpsi (D3350) 104 87
Tensile Yield, psi 3200 3150
Tensile Break, psi 3550 5650
Elongation, % 530 880
ESCR, C (milled), hrs. >2400 >1000
(1) C2 = 7-8 mol. %
(2) Residence Time = 75 min.
The data in Table III shows that the catalyst produced with the
inventive catalyst system has physical properties that are generally
comparable to those of the commercial scale pipe resin. It is important to
note that the polymer produced with the inventive catalyst composition did
exhibit significantly improved environmental stress crack resistance.
C3 ~ ~ ~
32827CA
17
,~.,._
Example IV
Another series of runs were conducted using the above-described
Ti/Cr catalysts in an attempt to produce polymers which would be suitable for
the production of films. The resulting polymers were compounded with the
following stabilizers and antioxidants: BHT 0.06, DLTDP 0.03 weight percent,
Ultranox 626 0.05 weight percent, and zinc stearate 0.05 weight percent based
on the total weight of the polymer. Run 17 differs in that in that case the
polymer was also compounded with 0.05 weight percent of FX 9613, a
fluoroelastomer. The polymerization variables, the polymer properties, and
the composition properties are summ~rized in Table IV.
3 ~ ~ ~
32827CA
w~ 18
,_
Table IV
Film Resins From Two-Catalyst Feeder Studies
Run 14 15 16 17( ) Control
Catalyst, Ti/Cr 50/50 50/50 50/5036/64
Reactor Temp., F 190 190 180 180
H2, mol. % 1.52 1.49 1.71 1.57
C6 1, wt. % of C2 (2) 14.9 15.1 14.8 14.2
TEA, ppm(3) 6 5 4
HL(MI), pellet 17 32 28 3 (0.28)
HLMI/MI 170 ]54 165 --
Density 0.946 0.946 0.9500.945 0.939
Fluff Bulk Density,
lbs/ft3 25.9 25.2 24.4 22.9
Productivity (ash)(4) 2380 2270 2380 2040
R&D Film Evaluation
(l-mil @ 75 rpm)
Dart Impact, g 121 118 79 260 130
Tear, g
MD 21 32 23 41 57
TD 483 509 448 157 426
(1) Ex_ruded w/fluoroelastomer
(2) C2 = 7-8 mol. %
(3) Based on isobutane feedrate
(4) Polymer residence time = 75 min.
The data in Table IV shows that higher polymerization temperatures appear to
help the incorporation of the l-hexene comonomer into the polymer chain as
2 ~
32827CA
""_,
i".,_ 19
evidenced by the lower density for the resin in Runs 14 and 15 when compared
with that of Run 16. The data also reveals that the chromium catalyst appears
to incorporate l-hexene more easily than the titanium catalyst. Accordingly
the higher the level of particulate chromium catalyst in the dual catalyst
system, the lower the density of the polymers produced. The film properties
for the experimentally produced resins were compared with a commercial scale
produced film resin composition. The properties of the film compositions were
generally comparable.
